Time to retire 'New daily persistent headache': Mode of onset of chronic migraine and tension-type headache

Current Update on Categorization of Migraine Subtypes on the Basis of Genetic Variation: a Systematic Review

Migraine is a complex neurovascular disorder that is characterized by severe behavioral, sensory, visual, and/or auditory symptoms. It has been labeled as one of the ten most disabling medical illnesses in the world by the World Health Organization (Aagaard et al Sci Transl Med 6(237):237ra65, 2014). According to a recent report by the American Migraine Foundation (Shoulson et al Ann Neurol 25(3):252-9, 1989), around 148 million people in the world currently suffer from migraine. On the basis of presence of aura, migraine is classified into two major subtypes: migraine with aura (Aagaard et al Sci Transl Med 6(237):237ra65, 2014) and migraine without aura. (Aagaard K et al Sci Transl Med 6(237):237ra65, 2014) Many complex genetic mechanisms have been proposed in the pathophysiology of migraine but specific pathways associated with the different subtypes of migraine have not yet been explored. Various approaches including candidate gene association studies (CGAS) and genome-wide association studies (Fan et al Headache: J Head Face Pain 54(4):709-715, 2014). have identified the genetic markers associated with migraine and its subtypes. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (Kaur et al Egyp J Neurol, Psychiatry Neurosurg 55(1):1-7, 2019) within genes involved in ion homeostasis, solute transport, synaptic transmission, cortical excitability, and vascular function have been associated with the disorder. Currently, the diagnosis of migraine is majorly behavioral with no focus on the genetic markers and thereby the therapeutic intervention specific to subtypes. Therefore, there is a need to explore genetic variants significantly associated with MA and MO as susceptibility markers in the diagnosis and targets for therapeutic interventions in the specific subtypes of migraine. Although the proper characterization of pathways based on different subtypes is yet to be studied, this review aims to make a first attempt to compile the information available on various genetic variants and the molecular mechanisms involved with the development of MA and MO. An attempt has also been made to suggest novel candidate genes based on their function to be explored by future research.

New Daily Persistent Headache in the Pediatric and Adolescent Population: An Updated Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a primary headache disorder characterized by the sudden onset of continuous pain and its intractability to treatment. It is more prevalent in the pediatric population than the adult population, but remains understudied and underdiagnosed. The purpose of the current article is to provide a current overview of new daily persistent headache in the pediatric and adolescent population, including history, pathophysiology, clinical findings, current and emerging treatment options, and the results of recent studies and meta-analyses.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite recent studies and meta-analyses showing significant phenotypic overlap between chronic migraine and NDPH in the pediatric population, multiple recent studies have come to conflicting conclusions about the overlap of medication overuse in headache and pediatric NDPH. Recent studies reveal alterations in neuroimaging, particularly in functional connectivity, in patients with NDPH. Patients frequently remain treatment-refractory even to medications that have historically proven helpful in this population; however, new treatment options, including calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies, may be more effective.

SUMMARY

NPDH remains a perplexing and difficult-to-manage condition for both children and adults. Despite a higher prevalence in the pediatric population, there are relatively few studies to guide the evaluation and treatment of NDPH in pediatric and adolescent patients. Early treatment, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, should be employed to reduce disability. Overall, further studies are needed to better understand pathogenesis and to identify more effective therapeutic strategies, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological.

Epidemiology and clinical features of hypnic headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypnic headache is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent headache attacks that occur exclusively during sleep, leading to awakening. Synthesizing the available epidemiological data might inform clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase for observational studies on hypnic headache published between 1 May 2004, and 22 December 2022. Two investigators independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis with meta-regression to estimate the prevalence of hypnic headache and its clinical features based on epidemiologic data from population-based and clinic-based studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies, one population-based and 13 clinic-based, met our eligibility criteria. The population-based study did not identify any people with hypnic headache. From 11 clinic-based studies, the pooled relative frequency of hypnic headache was 0.21% (95%CI, 0.13 to 0.35%; I2 = 87%) in adult patients evaluated for headache. The pooled mean age of onset was 60.5 years, with a slight female predisposition. Hypnic headache was typically bilateral (71%), pressing (73%), of moderate (38%) or severe (44%) pain intensity, and lasted about 115 minutes per attack.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data should be cautiously interpreted due to between-study heterogeneity. The identified clinical presentation of hypnic headache can guide clinical diagnosis, in addition to the International Classification of Headache Disorders.

New Daily Persistent Headache (NDPH): Unraveling the Complexities of Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current article aims to provide an overview of new daily persistent headache (NDPH), with a particular emphasis on its pathophysiology, evaluation, and current treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

NDPH is an uncommon and heterogeneous condition associated with various comorbidities and is of great significance due to its prolonged duration and high severity. Variable causes and clinical aspects of NDPH may reflect differences in its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, including genetics, environmental triggers, neuroinflammation, and brain changes. When assessing a patient with NDPH, potential triggers, past medical history, and differential diagnosis should be carefully considered. Non-pharmacological interventions aimed to improve diet, sleep patterns, and reduce consumption of caffeine and alcohol are recommended for all patients. Nerve blockade and nerve stimulation seem to be more efficacious in children than adults. Antiviral medications and neuroinflammation-targeting treatments may be helpful, particularly, when an infectious disease or severe inflammation is suspected. NDPH patients with concurrent affective disorders may benefit from treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, or benzodiazepines. Cerebrospinal-fluid-lowering medications may be useful for headaches started with a thunderclap or a Valsalva maneuver. Possible treatments for refractory NDPH include intravenous ketamine or lidocaine, onabotulinumtoxinA, and calcitonin gene-related peptide antibodies. Considering the variety of NDPH, it is critical to properly screen patients for correct diagnosis. Proper identification of potential mimics may enable precise therapy opportunities, yet there is no gold standard treatment for NDPH. Further well-designed studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and develop effective treatment strategies for NDPH.

Which headache disorders can be diagnosed concurrently? An analysis of ICHD3 criteria using prime encoding system

Introduction

Real-life headache presentations may fit more than one ICHD3 diagnosis. This project seeks to exhaustively list all logically consistent "co-diagnoses" according to the ICHD3 criteria. We limited our project to cases of two concurrent diagnoses.

Methods

We included the criteria for "Migraine" (1.1, 1.2, 1.3), "Tension-type headache" (2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4), "Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias" (3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5), and "Other primary headache disorders." We also excluded "probable" diagnosis criteria. Each characteristic in the above criteria is assigned a unique prime number. We then encoded each ICHD3 criteria into integers through multiplication in a list format; we called these criteria representations. "Codiagnoses representations" were generated by multiplying all possible pairings of criteria representations. We then manually encoded a list of logically inconsistent characteristics through multiplication. All co-diagnoses representations divisible by any inconsistency representations were filtered out, generating a list of co-diagnoses representations that were logically consistent. This list was then translated back into ICHD3 diagnoses.

Results

We used a total of 103 prime numbers to encode 578 ICHD3 criteria. Once illogical characteristics were excluded, we obtained 145 dual diagnoses. Of the dual diagnoses, two contained intersecting characteristics due to subset relationships, 14 contained intersecting characteristics without subset relationships, and 129 contained dual diagnoses as a result of non-intersecting characteristics.

Conclusion

Analysis of dual diagnosis in headaches offers insight into "loopholes" in the ICHD3 as well as a potential explanation for the source of a number of controversies regarding headache disorders. The existence of dual diagnoses and their identification may carry implications for future developments and testing of machine-learning diagnostic algorithms for headaches.

Phenotype of new daily persistent headache: subtypes and comparison to transformed chronic daily headache

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether new daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a single disorder or heterogenous group of disorders, and whether it is a unique disorder from chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache. We describe a large group of patients with primary NDPH, compare its phenotype to transformed chronic daily headache (T-CDH), and use cluster analysis to reveal potential sub-phenotypes in the NDPH group.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study using prospectively collected clinical data in patients with primary NDPH and T-CDH (encompassing chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache). We used logistic regression with propensity score matching to compare demographics, phenotype, comorbidities, and treatment responses between NDPH and T-CDH. We used K-means cluster analysis with Gower distance to identify sub-clusters in the NDPH group based on a combination of demographics, phenotype, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

We identified 366 patients with NDPH and 696 with T-CDH who met inclusion criteria. Patients with NDPH were less likely to be female (62.6% vs. 73.3%, p < 0.001). Nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia, motion sensitivity, vertigo, and cranial autonomic symptoms were all significantly less frequent in NDPH than T-CDH (p value for all < 0.001). Acute treatments appeared less effective in NDPH than T-CDH, and medication overuse was less common (16% vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Response to most classes of oral preventive treatments was poor in both groups. The most effective treatment in NDPH was doselupin in 45.7% patients (95% CI 34.8-56.5%). Cluster analysis identified three subgroups of NDPH. Cluster 1 was older, had a high proportion of male patients, and less severe headaches. Cluster 2 was predominantly female, had severe headaches, and few associated symptoms. Cluster 3 was predominantly female with a high prevalence of migrainous symptoms and headache triggers.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst there is overlap in the phenotype of NDPH and T-CDH, the differences in migrainous, cranial autonomic symptoms, and vulnerability to medication overuse suggest that they are not the same disorder. NDPH may be fractionated into three sub-phenotypes, which require further investigation.

Comparison of continuous headache features in youth with migraine, new daily persistent headache, and persistent post-traumatic headache

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical features in youth with continuous headache from migraine, persistent post-traumatic headache, and new daily persistent headache to determine if they are similar, contrary to their distinction in the International Classification of Headache Disorders.

METHODS

We pursued a single center age- and sex-matched observational study comparing the clinical characteristics of 150 youth (11 - 17 years old) with continuous headache from migraine, persistent post-traumatic headache, and new daily persistent headache. A diagnostic algorithm based on international classification of headache disorders criteria was used to identify those with migraine (headache features of migraine with gradual onset), and persistent post-traumatic headache and new daily persistent headache (based on the circumstances of headache onset regardless of headache features). Fifty participants each with migraine, persistent post-traumatic headache, and new daily persistent headache were matched by age and sex. Participant survey responses on headache characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

Median usual headache severity was 6.0 [95%CI 6.0, 6.0] and was not different across diagnostic groups (H statistic = 1.2, p = 0.55). Headache exacerbation frequency, disability, associated symptoms, and most triggers were not significantly different across groups. The majority of persistent post-traumatic headache and new daily persistent headache had headache features consistent with a diagnose of migraine (72% and 62%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that most persistent post-traumatic headache and new daily persistent headache may represent abrupt onset of migraine.

Comparison and predictors of chronic migraine vs. new daily persistent headache presenting with a chronic migraine phenotype

Objective

To compare the clinical phenotype of patients with chronic migraine (CM) to patients with new daily persistent headache of the chronic migraine subtype (NDPH‐CM).

Methods

A study was conducted of CM (n = 257) and NDPH‐CM (n = 76) from a tertiary headache center in the UK, and in the US of patients with daily CM (n = 60) and NDPH‐CM (n = 22).

Results

From the UK cohort, the age of first headache onset was lower in CM (mean ± SD: 16 ± 12 years) than in NDPH‐CM (mean ± SD: 23 ± 14 years; p < 0.001). There was a greater number of associated migrainous symptoms in CM compared to NDPH‐CM (median and interquartile range: 6, 5–8 vs. 5, 4–7; p < 0.001). A family history of headache was more common in CM compared to NDPH‐CM (82%, 202/248, vs. 53%, 31/59; p < 0.001). In the US cohort there were no differences. Osmophobia (B = −1.08; p = 0.002) and older age at presentation to the clinic (B = −0.06; p = 0.001) were negative predictors of NDPH‐CM.

Conclusion

NDPH‐CM is relatively less migrainous than CM in the UK cohort. Family history of headache is less common in NDPH‐CM, with negative predictors for NDPH‐CM including osmophobia and older age of presentation to the clinic. More work is required to understand the chronic migraine phenotype of new daily persistent headache.