1
|
Porter N. Dis-Illusioning Psychology: Epistemology and the Contextual Psychology of Ellyn Kaschak. WOMEN & THERAPY 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/02703149.2017.1241576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Porter
- Clinical PhD Program, California School of Professional Psychology/Alliant International University, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS. Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research. PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/0361684316629797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Intersectionality has become something of a buzzword in psychology and is well-known in feminist writings throughout the social sciences. Across diverse definitions of intersectionality, we find three common assumptions: (1) There is a recognition that all people are characterized simultaneously by multiple social categories and that these categories are interconnected or intertwined. (2) Embedded within each of these categories is a dimension of inequality or power. (3) These categories are properties of the individual as well as characteristics of the social context inhabited by those individuals; as such, categories and their significance may be fluid and dynamic. Understanding intersectionality as an approach and critical theory, rather than as a falsifiable theory, we consider its potential within research using quantitative methods. We discuss positivism, social constructionism, and standpoint epistemology in order to examine the implications of these epistemologies for research methods and to explore how compatible an intersectional approach may be with each. With an eye toward expanding the incorporation of intersectional approaches in the psychology of women, we discuss both the challenges and the potential of combining quantitative methods and intersectionality. We contend that quantitative methods can be used within an intersectional approach and that doing so will expand and develop the study of intersectionality, insofar as more research tools will be available to intersectionality researchers. We also contend that quantitative researchers should incorporate an intersectional approach into their work and that doing so will enrich and deepen our understanding of psychological constructs and processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M. Else-Quest
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Janet Shibley Hyde
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hallett K. Intersectionality and Serious Mental Illness—A Case Study and Recommendations for Practice. WOMEN & THERAPY 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/02703149.2014.978232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
4
|
Mizock L, Kaschak E. Women with Serious Mental Illness in Therapy: Intersectional Perspectives. WOMEN & THERAPY 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/02703149.2014.978209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|