Arthroscopically pertinent landmarks for tunnel positioning in single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

Fully and Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Meniscal Injury Classification, and Location Based on MRI

Meniscal injury is a common cause of knee joint pain and a precursor to knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The purpose of this study is to develop an automatic pipeline for meniscal injury classification and localization using fully and weakly supervised networks based on MRI images. In this retrospective study, data were from the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI). The MR images were reconstructed using a sagittal intermediate-weighted fat-suppressed turbo spin-echo sequence. (1) We used 130 knees from the OAI to develop the LGSA-UNet model which fuses the features of adjacent slices and adjusts the blocks in Siam to enable the central slice to obtain rich contextual information. (2) One thousand seven hundred and fifty-six knees from the OAI were included to establish segmentation and classification models. The segmentation model achieved a DICE coefficient ranging from 0.84 to 0.93. The AUC values ranged from 0.85 to 0.95 in the binary models. The accuracy for the three types of menisci (normal, tear, and maceration) ranged from 0.60 to 0.88. Furthermore, 206 knees from the orthopedic hospital were used as an external validation data set to evaluate the performance of the model. The segmentation and classification models still performed well on the external validation set. To compare the diagnostic performances between the deep learning (DL) models and radiologists, the external validation sets were sent to two radiologists. The binary classification model outperformed the diagnostic performance of the junior radiologist (0.82-0.87 versus 0.74-0.88). This study highlights the potential of DL in knee meniscus segmentation and injury classification which can help improve diagnostic efficiency.

Male sex, revision surgery, low volume of anterior cruciate ligament remnant, and significant instability are risk factors for Posterior Root Tear of the Lateral Meniscus in patients undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

This multicenter study aimed to determine the incidence of lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and identify associated risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society's registry. The study included all the patients in the registry who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery between June 2020 and June 2023, we excluded incomplete data. We compared delay from injury to surgery between LMPRTs group and No LMPRTs group. Variables investigated as potential risk factors for LMPRTs included age, sex, nature of surgery (primary or revision), pivot shift test result, side-to-side laxity under anesthesia, presence of ACL remnant, occurrence of medial meniscal tear, and presence of collateral ligament injury. Risk factors were analyzed using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Among the 5359 patients analyzed, LMPRTs occurred in 7.0% (n=375) of cases during ACL reconstruction. Mean age at surgery was 29.3 +/- 10.3 years old [11-77]. Concerning delay to surgery, the mean time was 8.4 +/- 23.1 weeks [0.0-347.2] in the No LMPRTs group and 6.5 +/- 10.2 weeks [0.2-61.6] in the LMPRTs group (p = 0.109). Univariate analysis revealed that male sex (p < 0.001), revision surgery (p < 0.001), medial meniscal injury (p = 0.007), ACL remnant (0% vs > 70%, <10% vs > 70%, 10 to 30% vs > 70%, 30 to 50% vs > 70%, 50 to 70% vs > 70%; p < 0.001) and higher pivot shift grade (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with a presence of LMPRTs. Age, side-to-side laxity, and collateral ligament injury were not found to be significant risk factor In multivariate analysis : male sex, revision surgery, pivot shift test result and a low volume of ACL remnant remained significant. Side to side laxity was also a significant factor in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study identified male sex, revision surgery, low volume of ACL remnant, side to side laxity and higher grade of pivot shift as significant risk factors for LMPRTs during ACL reconstruction.

Graft Suturing Method Affects on Graft Diameter in Hamstring-Based Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

 Various benefits of needleless suture loop techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft preparation have been discussed, yet their impact on graft diameter remains unexplored. We hypothesized that the suture loop technique would reduce the graft diameter compared to the conventional locking suture technique.

METHODS

 Fifty-seven patients whose grafts were made with the Krackow stitch (group K) and 54 patients with the suture loop (group SL) were analyzed retrospectively. (1) The distal (sutured side) diameter of each anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundle was compared to the proximal (non-sutured side) diameter, and (2) the average of the proximal and distal graft diameters in each group was calculated.

RESULTS

 In group K, 78.9% of anteromedial bundles and 40.3% of posterolateral bundles exhibited a larger distal diameter than the proximal, while in group SL, 42.6% of anteromedial bundles and 3.7% of posterolateral bundles showed a larger distal diameter. In both bundles, there were significantly fewer grafts with larger distal diameters in group SL (p < 0.001). The mean distal diameter of anteromedial bundles was smaller in group SL (6.33 ± 0.43 mm vs. 6.07 ± 0.43 mm, p < 0.005). Consequently, the distal cross-sectional area of anteromedial bundles in group SL was 8% smaller than that in group K.

CONCLUSION

 The use of the suture loop technique resulted in a significantly smaller distal diameter of the anteromedial bundle. This reduces the size of the tibial tunnel and may contribute to a reduction in potential damage to adjacent structures.

Effects of higher femoral tunnels on clinical outcomes, MRI, and second-look findings in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a minimal 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

To perform anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), tunnels should be placed relatively higher in the femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint based on the findings of direct and indirect femoral insertion. But the clinical results of higher femoral tunnels (HFT) in double-bundle ACLR (DB-ACLR) remain unclear. The purpose was to investigate the clinical results of HFT and lower femoral tunnels (LFT) in DB-ACLR.

METHODS

From September 2014 to February 2016, 83 patients who underwent DB-ACLR and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into HFT-ACLR (group 1, n = 37) and LFT-ACLR (group 2, n = 46) according to the position of femoral tunnels. Preoperatively and at the final follow-up, clinical scores were evaluated with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner activity, and Lysholm score. The stability of the knee was evaluated with KT-2000, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test. Cartilage degeneration grades of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) were evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Graft tension, continuity, and synovialization were evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Return-to-sports was assessed at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Significantly better improvement were found for KT-2000, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test postoperatively in group 1 ( P >0.05). Posterolateral bundles (PL) showed significantly better results in second-look arthroscopy regarding graft tension, continuity, and synovialization ( P <0.05), but not in anteromedial bundles in group 1. At the final follow-up, cartilage worsening was observed in groups 1 and 2, but it did not reach a stastistically significant difference ( P >0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in IKDC subjective score, Tegner activity, and Lysholm score between the two groups. Higher return-to-sports rate was found in group 1 with 86.8% (32/37) vs. 65.2% (30/46) in group 2 ( P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

The HFT-ACLR group showed better stability results, better PL, and higher return-to-sports rate compared to the LFT-ACLR group.

Reliability of the Tibial Spine Versus ACL Stump in Assisting Tibial Tunnel Positioning During ACL Reconstruction: Analysis Based on 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Modeling

Background

Several techniques have been used by surgeons for anatomic tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, including the ACL stump positioning (ASP) technique and the tibial spine positioning (TSP) technique.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bony landmarks (medial and lateral tibial spine [MLTS]) can be a reliable reference for improving the accuracy of tibial tunnel placement in anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction compared with the ACL stump. It was hypothesized that the MLTS would not be a reliable bony landmark for tibial tunnel placement.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The 3-dimensional computed tomography images of 111 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2020 and 2021 were included in this study. For tibial tunnel placement, the ASP technique was used in 49 patients, and the TSP technique was used in 62 patients. The 3-dimensional computed tomography images were reconstructed to enable measurements of the locations of the MLTS and tunnel center based on a grid method. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the MLTS location and tibial tunnel position as well as the accuracy (mean distance of each actual location from the anatomic center) and precision (standard deviation of the accuracy, indicating the reproducibility of the tunnel position) of the tunnel position between the ASP and TSP groups.

Results

Significant differences were observed between the ASP and TSP groups in terms of the tibial tunnel position on the mediolateral axis (46.7% ± 2.0% vs 45.9% ± 2.2%, respectively; P = .034), while no significant differences were found in terms of the accuracy (4.1% vs 4.6%, respectively; P = .259) or precision (2.1% vs 2.1%, respectively; P = .259) of tibial tunnel positioning between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

In anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction, the use of the MLTS for tibial tunnel placement achieved comparable accuracy and precision compared with the use of ACL remnants, supporting its role as a reliable bony landmark in tibial tunnel positioning.

Evaluation of the bone tunnel position and state of healing on second-look arthroscopy after pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy, including the bone tunnel position and the state of healing on second-look arthroscopy.

METHODS

The cohort comprised 22 patients (six men, 16 women) who underwent arthroscopic root fixation by the transtibial pullout technique for medial meniscus posterior root tear during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. The mean patient age was 63.7 years. The location of the tibial tunnel was assessed using a percentage-dependent method, and the location of a critical point was determined by two coordinates on CT. We defined the distance between the tibial tunnel center and the medial meniscal posterior root anatomic center as the TC-AC distance. The healing state was classified as complete, partial, or failed on second-look arthroscopy. Patients were categorized into those with complete or partial healing (group H) and those with failed healing (group F). The differences in the outcomes and characteristics of groups H and F were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve and 10 knees were classified into groups H and F, respectively. The bone tunnel position was significantly more posterior in group H than in group F. The TC-AC distance was significantly shorter in group H than in group F.

CONCLUSIONS

In pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy, it was considered important to create a bone tunnel position more posterior to increase the healing rate on second-look arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅳ.

A balance between native footprint coverage and overlap of the anterolateral meniscal root in tibial tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 3D MRI study

BACKGROUND

Tibial footprint of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is situated close to the anterior lateral meniscal root (ALMR) attachment.

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of the size and location of the tibial tunnel for ACL reconstruction on the ACL footprint coverage and overlap to the ALMR.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty knee MRI scans from twenty healthy subjects were recruited, and three-dimensional (3D) tibia models were created to show the tibial attachment sites of ACL and ALMR. Surgical simulation of the tibial tunnel drilling was performed on each 3D model, entering the joint at an angle set at 60 degrees from the tibial plateau plane and 55 degrees from the posterior tibial condylar axis, with analysis for six different drill sizes; 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5 and 10 mm; and nine locations; the center of the ACL attachment and eight locations 2% of the tibial width apart surrounding it. The width of the tibial plateau, the distance between ACL and ALMR attachment centers, and the size and location of the potential tibial tunnel were evaluated to determine association with the area of the ACL footprint coverage and ALMR overlap using a linear mixed effects model.

RESULTS

A large tunnel (p <.001), a central and anterior location (p <.029), and small tibial width (p =.015) were all associated with larger coverage of the ACL footprint. A large tunnel (p <.001), posteriorly and laterally located (p ≤ 0.001), and a small distance between the ACL and ALMR centers (p =.001) were significantly associated with a larger ALMR overlap. The association of the tunnel size to ALMR overlap reduced with a medial tunnel location.

CONCLUSIONS

The short distance between the centers of the ALMR attachment and native ACL footprint suggests that the ALMR will always be susceptible to overlap when the tibial tunnel is drilled in ACL reconstruction. Small alterations in tunnel location can lead to a statistically significant alteration with the amount of ALMR overlap. To minimize this overlap, whilst maintaining acceptable coverage of the ACL footprint, a tibial tunnel positioned in a medial or anteromedial location from the center of the ACL footprint is recommended.

ACL stump and ACL femoral landmarks are equally reliable in ACL reconstruction for assisting ACL femoral tunnel positioning

PURPOSE

This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the accuracy of femoral tunnel positioning after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed with the remnant preservation (RP) technique versus the non-remnant preservation (NRP) technique.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 145 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction from May 2020 to May 2022 were performed in this single-surgeon study. A total of 120 patients met the inclusion criteria and were allocated into two groups according to the surgical technique (i.e. RP group and NRP group). The relative location of the femoral tunnel in the lateral condyle was evaluated as a percentage using a standardized grid system on the three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) image. The accuracy and precision of the RP group were assessed based on published anatomical data in direct comparison with the NRP group.

RESULTS

According to the surgical procedure, 57 of the 120 patients included were allocated into the RP group, and 63 into the NRP group. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of tunnel position (posterior-to-distal (PD): 28.4 ± 5.4% (RP) vs. 31.8 ± 5.3% (NRP); P = 0.01), (anterior-to-posterior (AP): 32.6 ± 7.7% (RP) vs. 38.8 ± 7.7% (NRP); P = 0.00), while no significant differences were found in terms of the accuracy (8.6% (RP) vs. 8.9% (NRP); n.s) and precision (4.4% (RP) vs. 5.6% (NRP); n.s) of femoral tunnel positioning between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

From this single-surgeon study, it was concluded that there were no differences in the creation of ACL femoral tunnel between the RP technique and the non-remnant preserving technique. Meanwhile, the RP technique would not sacrifice the ideal position of the femoral tunnel and is able to retain the possible benefits of the ACL stump.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using Ruler-Assisted Positioning of the Femoral Tunnel Relative to the Posterior Apex of the Deep Cartilage: A Single-Center Case Series

The techniques available to locate the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have notable limitations. To evaluate whether the femoral tunnel center could be located intraoperatively with a ruler, using the posterior apex of the deep cartilage (ADC) as a landmark. This retrospective case series included consecutive patients with ACL rupture who underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction at the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Tongren Hospital between January 2014 and May 2018. During surgery, the ADC of the femoral lateral condyle was used as a landmark to locate the femoral tunnel center with a ruler. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was performed within 3 days after surgery to measure the femoral tunnel position by the quadrant method. Arthroscopy was performed 1 year after surgery to evaluate the intra-articular conditions. Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were determined before and 1 year after surgery. The final analysis included 82 knees of 82 patients (age = 31.7 ± 6.1 years; 70 males). The femoral tunnel center was 26 ± 1.5% in the deep-shallow (x-axis) direction and 31 ± 3.1% in the high-low (y-axis) direction, close to the "ideal" values of 27 and 34%. Lysholm score increased significantly from 38.5 (33.5-47) before surgery to 89 (86-92) at 1 year after surgery (p < 0.001). IKDC score increased significantly from 42.5 (37-47) before surgery to 87 (83.75-90) after surgery (p < 0.001). Using the ADC as a landmark, the femoral tunnel position can be accurately selected using a ruler.

The Spectrum of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Options for the Pediatric and Adolescent Patient: A Narrative Review

As youth sports participation has increased in recent years, injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) have become increasingly common in pediatric patients. Historically, ACL reconstruction was delayed in pediatric patients to avoid physeal damage with the potential for leg-length discrepancy or angular deformity. Current research shows that delaying reconstruction or choosing nonoperative management is associated with increased rates of meniscal and chondral injuries, persistent knee instability, and low rates of return to previous activity. Early ACL reconstruction using techniques to avoid physeal growth disturbance is now widely accepted among physicians. The purpose of this review was to describe the pediatric ACL in terms of the relevant anatomy and biomechanics, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging. In addition, the importance of skeletal age and possible physeal injury is discussed in the context of ACL reconstruction options by skeletal age and remaining growth potential.

Effect of Anterior Horn Tears of the Lateral Meniscus on Knee Stability

Background

Investigations on the biomechanical characteristics of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM) related to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial tunnel reaming have revealed increased contact pressure between the femur and tibia, decreased attachment area, and decreased ultimate failure strength.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of a complete radial tear of the AHLM on force distribution in response to applied anterior and posterior drawer forces and internal and external rotation torques. We hypothesized that the AHLM plays an important role in knee stability, primarily at lower knee flexion angles.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 9 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens and a robotic testing system were used. Anterior and posterior drawer forces up to 89 N and internal and external rotation torques up to 4 N·m were applied at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. A complete AHLM tear was then made 10 mm from the lateral border of the tibial attachment of the ACL, and the same tests performed in the intact state were repeated. Next, the recorded intact knee motion was reproduced in the AHLM-torn knee, and the change in the resultant force after an AHLM tear was determined by calculating the difference between the 2 states.

Results

In the torn AHLM, the reduction in the resultant force at 0° for external rotation torque (34.8 N) was larger than that at 60° (5.2 N; P < .01) and 90° (6.7 N; P < .01).

Conclusion

The AHLM played a role in facilitating knee stability against an applied posterior drawer force of 89 N and external rotation torque of 4 N·m, especially at lower knee flexion angles.

Clinical Relevance

This study provides information about the effects of AHLM injuries that may occur during single-bundle ACL reconstruction using a round tunnel.

Accuracy of the Arthroscopic Location of the Center of the Anterior Horn During Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

Background

Anatomic placement of the meniscal allograft is imperative to achieve satisfactory outcomes after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). Few studies have reported on the accuracy of the provisional location of the center of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM).

Hypothesis

The authors hypothesized that the provisional center would not coincide with the anatomic center of the AHLM.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

Tibial plateaus were retrieved from 93 consecutive patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. A complete radial cut was made 2 cm lateral to the insertion of the AHLM on the retrieved tibial plateau. While moving the stump of the anterior horn with forceps, the center of the insertion was determined, and a Kirschner wire (provisional wire) was drilled into the location. The insertion area of the AHLM was dissected carefully, and the periphery of the insertion area of the anterior horn was marked. Another Kirschner wire (anatomic wire) was drilled into the center of the dissected anterior horn. The resected tibial plateau was positioned so that the longitudinal line of the tibial plateau was aligned on a plastic ruler. The distance between the provisional and anatomic wires was measured by a digital caliper along the longitudinal and vertical axes.

Results

The mean distance between the provisional and anatomic wires was 2.5 ± 1.2 mm. The provisional wire in 14 patients (15%) was placed at the anatomic center. In 36 patients (39%), the provisional wire was drilled anterolateral to the anatomic center, and in 18 patients (19%), the wire was drilled anteromedial to the anatomic center. In 21 patients (23%), the provisional wire was located within 2 mm of the anatomic center, and in 62 patients (67%), the wire was located within 3 mm of the anatomic center.

Conclusion

The provisional wire was located a mean of 2.5 mm from the anatomic center, and only 23% of patients had wires that were located within 2 mm of the anatomic center. In 39% of patients, the provisional wire was drilled anterolateral to the anatomic center. This finding needs to be considered during lateral MAT.

Clinical Relevance

Without dissection of the AHLM, the determination of the anatomic center of the anterior horn is not accurate during lateral MAT.

A Modified Anatomic Transtibial Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provides Reliable Bone Tunnel Positioning

Purpose

To evaluate the femoral and tibial tunnel positions via a modified anatomic transtibial double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods

Patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the transtibial tunnel creation technique were identified. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed for 94 knees using the transtibial tunnel creation technique. Tunnel aperture configurations and center positions of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnels via postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography were evaluated.

Results

There were 94 knees included. Regarding the intra-articular tunnel aperture configurations, the AM and PL tunnels overlapped at the femoral and tibial aperture in 66.0% and 94.7% cases, respectively. The mean femoral bone tunnel center was located at 23.0 ± 3.9% in the posterior-to-anterior ratio and 28.7 ± 6.0% in the proximal-to-distal ratio for the AM tunnels and at 32.8 ± 4.7% and 51.2 ± 5.2% for the PL tunnels, respectively. In the tibial tunnels, the mean AM tunnel center was located at 31.4 ± 3.6% in the anterior-to-posterior ratio and 44.3 ± 1.8% in the medial-to-lateral ratio and at 47.5 ± 3.8% and 44.3 ± 1.9% in the PL tunnel center, respectively. The femoral tunnels of outliers, both those created in nonanatomic positions as well as the posterior wall blowouts, were revealed in 7.4% cases. The nonanatomical bone tunnel group had significant heavier weight patients, lower tibial posterior slope, and were anterior in the AM and PL tunnel position. Posterior wall blowouts were related to posterior and proximal PL bone tunnel positions.

Conclusions

Modified transtibial double-bundle ACL reconstruction is a reliable tunnel creation technique with anatomic placement in 92.6% of the cases. The modification required that partially superimposing configuration of the 2 tibial tunnel apertures. The nonanatomic tunnels were related to patients of heavier weight and lower tibial posterior sloped knees, whereas the posterior wall blowouts were related to the posterior and proximal PL bone tunnel positions.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Optimal Tibial Tunnel Placement for Medial and Lateral Meniscus Root Repair on the Anteromedial Tibia in the Setting of Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee

BACKGROUND

Although the risk of tibial tunnel convergence in the setting of multiligamentous reconstruction has been reported in the literature, the risk of tunnel convergence in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and medial and lateral meniscus root repair has not been defined.

PURPOSE

To examine the risk of tunnel convergence and to determine optimal tunnel placement for ACL and PCL reconstruction performed in conjunction with posterior medial and lateral meniscus root repairs on the anteromedial proximal tibia.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Three-dimensional (3D) tibial models were created using computed tomography scans of 20 cadaveric specimens. After determining optimal tunnel entry and exit points for ACL and PCL reconstructions, and medial and lateral meniscus root reattachment to the anatomic footprints, we used image processing software to create root tunnels over the anteromedial tibia on the tibial models. ACL and PCL tunnels were kept constant. The meniscus root repair tunnels were then reoriented to match the angle of the ACL tunnel, making both tunnels parallel in the sagittal plane. Tunnel convergence risk was analyzed by identifying the shortest 3D distance between tunnel axes and subtracting the radius of each tunnel from this distance for single- and double-tunnel repair techniques in both case scenarios.

RESULTS

All specimens demonstrated convergence between the ACL and lateral meniscus root tunnels when the root tunnel's entry was created proximal to the ACL tunnel's entry for single- and double-tunnel techniques, but no convergence was seen between these tunnels using the parallel orientation in the sagittal plane. There were no cases of convergence between the ACL and medial meniscus root tunnels in any of the configurations. The greatest distance between the ACL and medial meniscus root tunnels was achieved using the single-tunnel technique in parallel orientation (12.1 ± 2.8 mm). There were no cases of convergence between the PCL and medial meniscus root tunnels in the original orientation; however, 2 of 20 specimens demonstrated convergence using the parallel orientation with the double-tunnel technique, and there were no cases of convergence using the single-tunnel technique. The PCL and lateral meniscus root tunnels did not demonstrate convergence in any configuration.

CONCLUSION

There was a high risk of convergence between ACL and posterior meniscus root tunnels when all the tunnels were created on the anteromedial tibia. Reorienting meniscus root tunnels parallel to ACL tunnels may help reduce this risk. There is increased risk of tunnel convergence with root repairs in cases of bicruciate reconstructions, and therefore a double-tunnel root repair technique should be used with caution.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

To avoid tibial tunnel convergence when performing ACL and PCL reconstruction with medial and lateral meniscus root repair, surgeons should reorient the meniscus root repair tunnels to be parallel on the sagittal plane to the ACL tunnel to decrease the risk of convergence. In cases of bicruciate ligament reconstruction, use of the double-tunnel technique requires caution to avoid convergence risk with the PCL tunnel.

Freehand Anatomic Transtibial Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Creation of the femoral tunnel for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has a high rate of nonanatomic placement with the transtibial (TT) technique but yields better restoration with the anteromedial portal technique and close restoration of the anatomic femoral footprint with the outside-in technique. Modifications of the traditional (TT) technique have been described to restore the native femoral ACL footprint and to simulate double-bundle reconstruction. Modified TT techniques try to capture the anatomic femoral footprint through an anatomic tibial tunnel. In the technique described in this article, the anatomic femoral footprint is drilled first by the use of a 2.5-mm Kirschner wire through the parapatellar anteromedial portal, making an angle 30° to the sagittal plane and 20° to the horizontal plane. The wire is drilled while the knee is hyperflexed and then withdrawn from outside until its distal end reaches the intercondylar notch. The wire is then advanced in an antegrade manner while the knee is flexed 90° until it reaches the center of the marked tibial footprint. The angle of knee flexion may be slightly increased or decreased around 90° with or without slight internal rotation to capture the anatomic tibial footprint. The procedure is completed as a TT single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

The novel epiligament theory: differences in healing failure between the medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments

According to current literature, 90% of knee ligament injuries involve the medial collateral ligament or the anterior cruciate ligament. In contrast to the medial collateral ligament, which regenerates relatively well, the anterior cruciate ligament demonstrates compromised healing. In the past, there were numerous studies in animal models that examined the healing process of these ligaments, and different explanations were established. Although the healing of these ligaments has been largely investigated and different theories exist, unanswered questions persist.

Therefore, the aim of this article is 1) to review the different historical aspects of healing of the medial collateral ligament and present the theories for healing failure of the anterior cruciate ligament; 2) to examine the novel epiligament theory explaining the medial collateral ligament healing process and failure of anterior cruciate ligament healing; and 3) to discuss why the enveloping tissue microstructure of the aforementioned ligaments needs to be examined in future studies.

We believe that knowledge of the novel epiligament theory will lead to a better understanding of the normal healing process for implementing optimal treatments, as well as a more holistic explanation for anterior cruciate ligament healing failure.

Higher Incidence of Radiographic Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis With Transtibial Femoral Tunnel Positioning Compared With Anteromedial Femoral Tunnel Positioning During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anteromedial (AM) femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been reported by some authors to yield superior clinical and functional outcomes compared with the transtibial (TT) approach; however, differences in the subsequent rates of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) are not clear.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the influence of femoral tunnel positioning during primary ACLR on the development of radiographic PTOA.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

METHODS

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2019), and MEDLINE (1980-2019) were queried for all studies describing the development of PTOA after TT or AM ACLR. Data pertaining to patient demographics, ACLR technique, and radiographic PTOA were extracted. A meta-analysis utilizing the DerSimonian-Laird method for random effects was used to compare the weighted proportion of PTOA after ACLR between the TT and AM approaches.

RESULTS

There were 16 studies identified for inclusion with a total of 1546 patients. The mean follow-up across all studies was 10.9 years (range, 5.4-17.8 years). The mean follow-up in the AM and TT groups was 10.8 years (range, 5.4-17 years) and 11.4 years (range, 6-17.8 years), respectively. A total of 783 (50.6%) patients underwent TT ACLR. Of these patients, 401 (weighted mean, 49.3%) developed radiographic PTOA. A total of 763 (49.4%) patients underwent AM ACLR. Of these patients, 166 (mean, 21.8%) went on to develop radiographic PTOA. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly greater rate of PTOA after ACLR using a TT technique compared with an AM technique overall (49.3% vs 25.4%, respectively; P < .001) and when studies were stratified by 5- to 10-year (53.7% vs 14.2%, respectively; P < .001) and greater than 10-year (45.6% vs 31.2%, respectively; P < .0001) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

TT ACLR was associated with higher overall rates of radiographic PTOA compared with the AM ACLR approach. The rates of radiographic PTOA after ACLR with a TT approach were also significantly higher than using an AM approach when stratified by length of follow-up (5- to 10-year and >10-year follow-up).

The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft

Purpose: The aims of this study were to 1) investigate the effects of femoral drilling angle in coronal and sagittal planes on the stress and strain distribution around the femoral and tibial tunnel entrance and the stress distribution on the graft, following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), 2) identify the optimal femoral drilling angle to reduce the risk of the tunnel enlargement and graft failure.

Methods: A validated three-dimensional (3D) finite element model of a healthy right cadaveric knee was used to simulate an anatomic ACLR with the anteromedial (AM) portal technique. Combined loading of 103.0 N anterior tibial load, 7.5 Nm internal rotation moment, and 6.9 Nm valgus moment during normal human walking at joint flexion of 20° was applied to the ACLR knee models using different tunnel angles (30°/45°/60° and 45°/60° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively). The distribution of von Mises stress and strain around the tunnel entrances and the graft was calculated and compared among the different finite element ACLR models with varying femoral drilling angles.

Results: With an increasing coronal obliquity drilling angle (30° to 60°), the peak stress and maximum strain on the femoral and tibial tunnel decreased from 30° to 45° and increased from 45° to 60°, respectively. With an increasing sagittal obliquity drilling angle (45° to 60°), the peak stress and the maximum strain on the bone tunnels increased. The lowest peak stress and maximum strain at the ACL tunnels were observed at 45° coronal/45° sagittal drilling angle (7.5 MPa and 7,568.3 μ-strain at the femoral tunnel entrance, and 4.0 MPa and 4,128.7 μ-strain at the tibial tunnel entrance). The lowest peak stress on the ACL graft occurred at 45° coronal/45° sagittal (27.8 MPa) drilling angle.

Conclusions: The femoral tunnel drilling angle could affect both the stress and strain distribution on the femoral tunnel, tibial tunnel, and graft. A femoral tunnel drilling angle of 45° coronal/ 45° sagittal demonstrated the lowest peak stress, maximum strain on the femoral and tibial tunnel entrance, and the lowest peak stress on the ACL graft.

Stay Ipsilateral: An Analysis of Tibial Tunnel Distance Between Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterior Meniscal Root Repair

Purpose

To establish mean distance or identify intersection between tibial tunnels for posterior meniscal root repair in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.

Methods

Twelve cadaver knees and 12 solid foam synthetic tibiae were used. ACL and PCL tunnels were drilled for single-bundle reconstruction, and both medial and lateral posterior root repair tunnels were drilled. Specimens underwent computed tomography scanning and shortest distances between tunnels in all planes were measured by 2 readers. Distances were compared between groups using a t-test.

Results

In ACL reconstruction, the medial meniscal root tunnel was not significantly closer to the cruciate tunnel when drilled from either medial or lateral side (P = .333). The lateral meniscal root tunnel was significantly closer when drilled from medial compared to lateral side (P < .001). In PCL reconstruction, both medial (P = .037) and lateral (P = .028) meniscal root tunnels were significantly closer to the PCL tunnel when drilled from the contralateral side of the tibia.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that posterior meniscal root repair tunnels are often placed within a few millimeters and can even intersect cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnels in the proximal tibia.

Clinical Relevance

The information in this study may assist surgeons in planning for cruciate ligament reconstruction with concomitant posterior meniscal root repair.

Meniscal Ramp Lesions and Root Tears: A Review of the Current Literature

The importance of the menisci in providing joint stability and their role in load transmission within the knee are well understood. A growing body of literature has emerged on 2 distinct injury patterns to these crucial anatomic structures, ramp lesions and root tears. Ramp lesions may be characterized as tears at the posterior meniscocapsular junction, while root tears involve bony or soft tissue avulsion of the meniscal insertions at the anterior or posterior intercondylar regions. In this 2-part review, we present an overview of the current available literature on ramp lesions and meniscal root tears, summarizing the unique anatomic considerations, etiology, biomechanics, management decisions, clinical outcomes pertinent to these very distinct injuries.

The intercondylar fossa-A narrative review

The intercondylar fossa (“intercondylar notch,” IN) is a groove at the distal end of the femur, housing important stabilizing structures: cruciate ligaments and meniscofemoral ligaments. As the risk for injury to these structures correlates with changes to the IN, exact knowledge of its morphology, possible physiological and pathological changes and different approaches for evaluating it are important. The divergent ways of assessing the IN and the corresponding measurement methods have led to various descriptions of its possible shapes. Ridges at the medial and lateral wall are considered clinically important because they can help with orientation during arthroscopy, whereas ridges at the osteochondral border could affect the risk of ligament injury. Changes related to aging and sex differences have been documented, further emphasizing the importance of individual assessment of the knee joint. Overall, it is of the utmost importance to remember the interactions between the osseous housing and the structures within.

Effect of Tibial Tunnel Placement Using the Lateral Meniscus as a Landmark on Clinical Outcomes of Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear if use of the lateral meniscus anterior horn (LMAH) as a landmark will produce consistent tunnel positions in the anteroposterior (AP) distance across the tibial plateau.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the AP location of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction tibial tunnels utilizing the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark and to examine how tunnel placement affects knee stability and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 98 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts between March 2013 and June 2017. Patients with unilateral ACL injuries and a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in the study. All guide pins for the tibial tunnel were placed using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark. Guide pins were evaluated with the Bernard-Hertel grid in the femur and the Stäubli-Rauschning method in the tibia. Patients were divided by the radiographic location of the articular entry point of the guide pin with relation to the anterior 40% of the tibial plateau. Outcomes were evaluated by the Marx Activity Scale and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Anterior knee laxity was evaluated using a KT-1000 arthrometer and graded with the objective portion of the IKDC form. Rotational stability was evaluated using the pivot-shift test.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were available for follow-up at a mean 28.6 months. The overall percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel was 39.3% ± 3.8% (mean ± SD; range, 31%-47%). Side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity was significantly lower in the anterior group than the posterior group (1.2 ± 1.1 mm vs 2.5 ± 1.3 mm; P < .001; r = 0.51). The percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel demonstrated a positive medium correlation with side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity as measured by a KT-1000 arthrometer (r = 0.430; P < .001). The anterior group reported significantly better distribution of IKDC grading as compared with the posterior group (26 grade A and 6 grade B vs 15 grade A and 13 grade B; P = .043; V = 0.297). The pivot-shift test results and outcome scores showed no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intraoperative landmark yields a wide range of tibial tunnel locations along the tibial plateau, with anterior placement of the tibial tunnel leading toward improved anterior knee stability.

Effect of Percentage of Femoral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insertion Site Reconstructed With Hamstring Tendon on Knee Kinematics and Graft Force

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have stated that closely matching the size of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insertion site footprint is important for biomechanical function and clinical stability after ACL reconstruction. However, the ACL varies widely regarding the area of femoral insertion, tibial insertion, and midsubstance of ACL, and reconstructing the insertion site area with a uniform diameter graft can result in a cross-sectional area that is greater than that of the midsubstance of the native ACL. Therefore, understanding the effect of relative graft size in ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics is important for surgical planning.

PURPOSE

To assess how the percentage of femoral insertion site affects knee biomechanics in single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 14 human cadaveric knees were scanned with magnetic resonance imaging and tested using a robotic system under an anterior tibial load and a combined rotational load. In total, 7 knee states were evaluated: intact ACL; deficient ACL; single-bundle ACL reconstruction with approximate graft sizes 25% (small), 50% (medium), and 75% (large) of the femoral insertion site; and double-bundle reconstruction of approximately 50% (medium) and 75% (large) of the femoral insertion site, based on the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the graft to the area of the femoral ACL insertion site determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Anterior tibial translation was not significantly larger than the intact state in single-bundle and double-bundle medium graft reconstructions (P > .05) and was significantly greater in the single-bundle small graft reconstruction (P < .05). Anterior knee translation in single-bundle medium graft and large graft reconstructions was not statistically different (P > .05). In contrast, the anterior tibial translation for double-bundle large graft reconstruction was significantly smaller than for double-bundle medium graft reconstruction at low flexion angles (P < .05). The single-bundle small graft force was significantly different from the intact ACL in situ force (P < .05). The graft force with double-bundle large reconstruction was significantly greater than that with the double-bundle medium reconstruction (P < .05) but was not significantly different from that of the intact ACL (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Knee biomechanics with a single-bundle small graft tended to be significantly different from those of the intact knee. In the kinematic and kinetic data for the single- and double-bundle medium graft reconstruction, only the anterior translation at full extension for the single-bundle reconstruction was significantly different (lower) from that of intact knee. This was a time zero study.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study can provide surgeons with guidance in selecting the graft size for ACL reconstruction.

Placement of an anatomic tibial tunnel significantly improves the medial meniscus posterior extrusion at 90° of knee flexion following medial meniscus posterior root pullout repair

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of tibial tunnel position in pullout repair for a medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tear (MMPRT) on postoperative MM extrusion.

METHODS

Thirty patients (median age 63 years, range 35-72 years) who underwent transtibial pullout repairs for MMPRTs were included. Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using a rectangular measurement grid for assessment of tibial tunnel position and MM posterior root attachment. Preoperative and postoperative MM medial extrusion (MMME) and posterior extrusion (MMPE) at 10° and 90° knee flexion were measured using open magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Tibial tunnel centers were located more anteriorly and more medially than the anatomic center (median distance 5.8 mm, range 0-9.3 mm). The postoperative MMPE at 90° knee flexion was significantly reduced after pullout repair, although there was no significant reduction in MMME or MMPE at 10° knee flexion after surgery. In the correlation analysis of the displacement between the anatomic center to the tibial tunnel center and improvements in MMME, and MMPE at 10° and 90° knee flexion, there was a significant positive correlation between percentage distance and improvement of MMPE at 90° knee flexion.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the nearer the tibial tunnel position to the anatomic attachment of the MM posterior root, the more effective the reduction in MMPE at 90° knee flexion. Our results emphasize that an anatomic tibial tunnel should be created in the MM posterior root to improve the postoperative MMPE and protect the articular cartilage in a knee flexion position. Placement of an anatomic tibial tunnel significantly improves the MMPE at 90° of knee flexion after MM posterior root pullout repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Beighton Score, Tibial Slope, Tibial Subluxation, Quadriceps Circumference Difference, and Family History Are Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure: A Retrospective Comparison of Primary and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

PURPOSE

To assess patient history, physical examination findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3-dimensional computed tomographic (3D CT) measurements of those with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure compared with primary ACL tear patients to better discern risk factors for ACL graft failure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review comparing patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with a primary ACLR group with minimum 1-year follow-up. Preoperative history, examination, and imaging data were collected and compared. Measurements were made on MRI, plain radiographs, and 3D CT. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent primary ACLR by a single surgeon at a single center with minimum 1-year follow-up or ACL graft failure with revision ACLR performed by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

A total of 109 primary ACLR patients, mean age 33.7 years (range 15 to 71), enrolled between July 2016 and July 2018 and 90 revision ACLR patients, mean age 32.9 years (range 16 to 65), were included. The revision ACLR group had increased Beighton score (4 versus 0; P < .001) and greater side-to-side differences in quadricep circumference (2 versus 0 cm; P < .001) compared with the primary ACLR group. A family history of ACL tear was significantly more likely in the revision group (47.8% versus 16.5%; P < .001). The revision group exhibited significantly increased lateral posterior tibial slope (7.9° versus 6.2°), anterolateral tibial subluxation (7.1 versus 4.9 mm), and anteromedial tibia subluxation (2.7 versus 0.5 mm; all P < .005). In the revision group, femoral tunnel malposition occurred in 66.7% in the deep-shallow position and 33.3% in the high-low position. The rate of tibial tunnel malposition was 9.7% from medial to lateral and 54.2% from anterior to posterior. Fifty-six patients (77.8%) had tunnel malposition in ≥2 positions. Allograft tissue was used for the index ACLR in 28% in the revision group compared with 14.7% in the primary group.

CONCLUSION

Beighton score, quadriceps circumference side-to-side difference, family history of ACL tear, lateral posterior tibial slope, anterolateral tibial subluxation, and anteromedial tibia subluxation were all significantly different between primary and revision ACLR groups. In addition, there was a high rate of tunnel malposition in the revision ACLR group.

Positioning of the Tibial Tunnel After Single-Bundle ACL Primary Reconstruction on 3D CT scans: A New Method

Purpose

To assess intra-articular tunnel aperture positioning after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either the reference standard method or the intercondylar area method in a single center using 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the intra-articular position of the tibial tunnel relative to the ACL footprint.

Methods

3D CT scans were performed after 120 single-bundle primary ACL reconstruction cases. The center of the tibial tunnel aperture and the center of the ACL footprint were referenced on axial views of the tibial plateau in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) planes according to a centimetric grid system including the whole plateau (reference standard). This was compared with a grid system based on intercondylar area bony anatomy. The posterior aspect of intertubercular fossa, anterior aspect of the tibial plateau, medial intercondylar ridge, and crossing point between lateral intercondylar ridge and posterior margin were used as landmarks to define the grid.

Results

According to the reference standard method, the center of the tibial tunnel aperture was positioned 0.57 ± 2.62 mm more posterior and 0.67 ± 1.55 mm more medial than the center of the footprint. According to the intercondylar area method, the center of the tibial tunnel aperture was positioned 1.32 ± 2.74 mm more posterior and 0.66 ± 1.56 mm more medial than the center of the footprint. The position difference between the center of the tunnel aperture and the center of the footprint were statistically correlated for both grids, with r = –0.887, P < .001 for AP positioning and r = 0.615, P < .001 for ML positioning.

Conclusion

This intercondylar area method using arthroscopic landmarks can be used to assess tunnel placement on 3D CT scans after ACL reconstruction.

Level of Evidence

III, retrospective comparative study.

Partial lateral meniscus anterior root injuries during anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are likely to occur in women with small skeletons

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the occurrence and characteristics of lateral meniscus anterior root injuries during anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2018, 70 women who had ACL injuries without lateral meniscal tears underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Using computed tomography, the anatomical relationship between the predicted lateral meniscus anterior root insertion and the tibial tunnel was retrospectively assessed, and the patients were divided into partial lateral meniscus anterior root injury and intact groups. The demographic characteristics, the distances between bony landmarks, the tibial tunnel sizes, and lateral meniscal extrusion assessed by magnetic resonance imaging were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 70 patients had suspected partial lateral meniscus anterior root injuries. Patient height was significantly shorter in the injury group than in the intact group (157.7 ± 6.4 vs. 161.4 ± 5.4 cm: p = 0.03); the distance from the apex to the bottom of the slope of the medial intercondylar ridge was significantly shorter in the injury group than in the intact group (15.1 ± 1.9 vs. 16.7 ± 1.4 mm: p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial lateral meniscus anterior root injury during anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction was suspected in 18% of cases. Patient height and the distance between bony landmarks were significantly shorter in the injury group than in the intact group. Surgeons should understand that even a slight deviation of the tibial tunnel position can lead to partial lateral meniscus anterior root injury in patients with small skeletons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Flexible reamers create comparable anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction femoral tunnels without the hyperflexion required with rigid reamers: 3D-CT analysis of tunnel morphology in a randomised clinical trial

PURPOSE

The hyperflexion required for femoral tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be challenging in patients with increased body habitus or musculature. Whilst allowing femoral tunnel creation without hyperflexion, additional benefits of flexible reamers have been proposed in terms of tunnel dimensions. The purpose of this study was to examine whether these theoretical benefits are seen in a clinical study.

METHODS

Fifty adult patients (with isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture) were randomised to reconstruction with either flexible or rigid femoral reamers. Femoral tunnel drilling was performed at 100° flexion (flexible system) or maximal hyperflexion (rigid system). Otherwise, the procedure was standardised. Femoral tunnel measurements were performed by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist who was blinded to the method of femoral drilling. Tunnel position, length and angles (axial and coronal) were measured alongside aperture shape and exit point using three-dimensional computed tomography 3-6 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

With no difference in tunnel position, tunnel length was found to increase with the use of the flexible system (37.8 ± 3.7 vs 35.0 ± 4.4 mm; p = 0.024). In addition, the exit point and fixation device were more anterior on the lateral femur using the flexible reamers (p = 0.016). No difference was seen in either tunnel angles or aperture shape. One case of incomplete posterior blow-out was seen in each of the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This comparative study shows that flexible reamers can reproduce a desired femoral tunnel position with only small improvements of no clinical relevance. As this can be achieved without hyperflexing the knee, these systems can be used for all patients (even when hyperflexion is a challenge).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes After Primary ACL Reconstruction and Meniscus Ramp Repair

Background:

Satisfactory outcomes have been reported after all-inside meniscus ramp repair with combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, clinical outcomes after ACLR with inside-out meniscus ramp repair are limited.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes for patients who underwent ACLR and medial meniscus ramp repair compared with those who underwent isolated ACLR; patients in the 2 groups were matched for age, sex, and sport/activity. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence 3.

Methods:

Patients who underwent primary ACLR with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autograft by a single surgeon were retrospectively identified. A subgroup of patients with combined ACLR and meniscus ramp repair with a minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up were matched to a cohort who underwent isolated ACLR. Subjective patient-reported questionnaires, knee stability, and return to level of activity/sport were collected.

Results:

There were 851 patients who underwent primary ACLR; of these, 158 (18.6%) had medial meniscus ramp lesions confirmed at arthroscopy. The most common clinical characteristics in patients with ramp lesions were chronic injuries (68.4%), contact mechanism (88%), concomitant lateral meniscus tears (63.2%), and concomitant lateral meniscus posterior root tears (22.2%). Further, 50 patients who underwent combined ACLR and meniscus ramp repair with minimum 2-year follow-up were matched to patients who underwent isolated ACLR. Both groups reported significant improvements in subjective outcomes from preoperative to postoperative assessments (P < .001). No significant differences were found in postoperative outcomes for combined ACLR with ramp repair versus isolated ACLR (P > .05). Patients with meniscus ramp repair had increased preoperative knee laxity demonstrated by grade 3 Lachman (44% vs 6%) and pivot-shift (38% vs 12%) test results compared with patients who underwent isolated ACLR (P ≤ .005 for both).

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates similar clinical outcomes, knee stability on postoperative physical examination, and return-to-sport rates for patients who underwent combined ACLR with BPTB autograft and inside-out meniscus ramp repair versus a matched cohort who underwent isolated ACLR. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for the presence of ramp lesions in patients with ACL tears who have a contact mechanism of injury, grade 3 Lachman test result, and concomitant lateral meniscal abnormality.

Femoral Interference Screw Fixation in ACL Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts

» Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure with numerous reconstructive graft and fixation options. Interference screws have become one of the most commonly utilized methods of securing ACL grafts such as bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. » The composition of interference screws has undergone substantial evolution over the past several decades, and numerous advantages and disadvantages are associated with each design. » The composition, geometry, and insertional torque of interference screws have important implications for screw biomechanics and may ultimately influence the strength, stability of graft fixation, and biologic healing in ACL reconstruction. » This article reviews the development and biomechanical properties of interference screws while examining outcomes, complications, and gaps in knowledge that are associated with the use of femoral interference screws during BPTB ACL reconstruction.

Injury of the Meniscus Root

Meniscus root tears biomechanically disrupt normal joint loading and lead to joint overload with the possible development of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee and early-onset osteoarthritis. Proper identification and treatment of meniscal root tears has been proven to restore joint loading and improve patient outcomes.

Medial meniscus posterior root repair decreases posteromedial extrusion of the medial meniscus during knee flexion

BACKGROUND

Medial meniscus (MM) medial extrusion in the coronal plane does not always improve, even after repair. This study aimed to determine the extent of posteromedial extrusion of the MM during knee flexion before and after MM pullout repair using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Data from 14 patients (mean age, 63.4 years; 86% female) who had undergone MM pullout repair at the current institution between August 2017 and October 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The MRIs were performed pre-operatively and ≥3 months postoperatively. Three-dimensional MRIs of the tibial surface and MM were evaluated using Tsukada's measurement method before and after pullout repair. The expected center of MM posterior root attachment (point A), the point on the extruded edge of the MM farthest away from point A (point E), and the point of intersection of a line through the posteromedial corner of the medial tibial plateau and a line connecting points A and E (point I) were identified. Subsequently, the pre-operative and postoperative AE and IE distances were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Point E was laterally shifted by the pullout repair, whereas point I showed no significant change. The postoperative IE distance (6.7 mm) was significantly shorter than the pre-operative one (9.1 mm, P < 0.01). The postoperative AE distance (29.3 mm) was significantly shorter than the pre-operative one (31.5 mm, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The AE and IE distances significantly decreased after MM posterior root repair, suggesting that transtibial pullout repair may be useful in reducing posteromedial extrusion of the MM.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a double bundle hamstring autograft configuration in patients under 30 years

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has a high incidence of re-tear in younger patients. Despite comparable functional outcomes, the incidence of re-tear using single and double bundle ACLR methods has not been well reported.

AIM

To hypothesize that double bundle hamstring ACLR has a lower graft rupture rate compared with single bundle hamstring ACLR grafts in young patients.

METHODS

One hundred and twelve patients < 30 years of age at the time of primary double bundle ACLR were eligible for study participation. 91 (81.3%) could be contacted, with a mean age of 20.4 years (range 13-29) and mean post-operative follow-up time of 59 mo (range 25-107). Telephone questionnaires evaluated the incidence (and timing) of subsequent re-tear and contralateral ACL tear, further surgeries, incidence and time to return to sport, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 91 patients, there were 6 (6.6%, 95%CI: 1.4-11.7) ACL graft re-ruptures, with a mean time to re-rupture of 28 mo (range 12-84). Fourteen patients (15.4%) experienced a contralateral ACL rupture and 14 patients (15.4%) required further surgery to their ipsilateral knee. fifty patients (54.9%) returned to pre-injury level of sport. Of those < 20 years (n = 45), 4 patients (8.9%, 95%CI: 0.4-17.3) experienced a re-rupture, with mean time to re-injury 15 mo (range 12-24). Comparative analysis with existing literature and revealed a non-significant Chi-squared statistic of 2.348 (P = 0.125).

CONCLUSION

A trend existed toward lower graft rupture rates in young patients undergoing double bundle ACLR utilizing a hamstring autograft, compared with rates reported after single bundle ACLR.

Evaluating the Accuracy of Tibial Tunnel Placement After Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction improves knee kinematics and joint stability in symptomatic patients who have ACL deficiency. Despite a concerted effort to place the graft within the ACL's native attachment sites, the accuracy of tunnel placement using contemporary techniques is not well established.

PURPOSE

To use 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D MRI) to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of tibial tunnel placement after anatomic ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Forty patients with symptomatic, ACL-deficient knees were prospectively enrolled in the study and underwent 3D MRI of both their injured and uninjured knees before and after surgery through use of a validated imaging protocol. The root ligament of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus was used as a radiographic reference, and the center of the reconstructed graft was compared with that of the contralateral normal knee. The tunnel angles and intra-articular graft angles were also measured, as was the percentage overlap between the native tibial footprint and tibial tunnel.

RESULTS

The reconstructed tibial footprint was placed at a mean ± SD of 2.14 ± 2.45 mm (P < .001) medial and 5.11 ± 3.57 mm (P < .001) posterior to the native ACL footprint. The mean distance between the center of the native and reconstructed ACL at the tibial attachment site was 6.24 mm. Of the 40 patients, 18 patients had a tibial tunnel that overlapped more than 50% of the native footprint, and 10 patients had maximal (100%) overlap. Further, 22 of the 40 patients had less than 50% overlap with the native footprint, and in 12 patients the footprint was missing completely.

CONCLUSION

Despite the use of contemporary surgical techniques to perform anatomic ACL reconstruction, a significant positioning error in tibial tunnel placement remains.

The interrelationship between anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint and anterolateral meniscal root insertions: Quantitative, morphological and positional analyses using three-dimensional computed tomography images

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate quantitative, morphological and positional differences between the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial footprint and anterolateral meniscal root (ALMR) insertion and investigate an intraoperative landmark to estimate their boundaries.

METHODS

Thirty-three fixed human cadaveric knees were evaluated. After resecting the components, the anterior fiber (AF) and posterior fiber (PF) of ALMR, the tibial center of ACL bundles (anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles) and ACL were marked. Insertion morphology was classified into three categories, and the distance and relative positional relationship between AF/PF insertions and the center of each attachment were measured on three-dimensional computed tomography images.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the AF of AM and ACL (P = 0.16), but both were significantly shorter than the AF of PL (both P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the PF of ACL and PL (P = 0.99), which were significantly shorter than PF of AM (both P < 0.001). Morphology of the ACL tibial insertion was classified as follows: triangular, 15 knees (45.5%); oval, 18 knees (54.5%); none, C-shape. Quantitative and positional analyses showed that the AF insertion was significantly closer to AM and ACL centers in the oval type than in the triangular type. Excluding two cases, the AF/PF insertion was located laterally to the ML center of the medial and lateral intercondylar tubercles.

CONCLUSION

Proximity of ACL tibial footprint and ALMR varies by their footprint morphology. The medial and lateral intercondylar tubercles were useful landmarks for ALMR injury prevention.

Single-Stage Multiple-Ligament Knee Reconstructions for Sports-Related Injuries: Outcomes in 194 Patients

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after sports-related multiple-ligament knee reconstructions are limited.

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes after single-stage surgical treatment of sports-related multiple-ligament knee injuries and to compare outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-based and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-based multiple-ligament knee reconstructions.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Skeletally mature patients with at least 2 major knee ligaments torn during a sporting activity that required surgery with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were included. The Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Clinical data, including range of motion and knee stability, were also recorded at final follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 276 patients with multiple-ligament knee injuries incurred during sport participation from 2010 to 2016 were identified. Of the 276 patients, 194 (70.5%) had complete follow-up at a mean 3.5 years (range, 2-8 years). There was a significant improvement in all outcome scores as compared with the preoperative scores (P < .001 for all scores). The median (first and third quartiles) Tegner activity score improved from 1 (0, 2) preoperatively to 6 (4, 7) postoperatively. Significant improvements were from 41 (22, 57) to 90 (78, 95) and 44 (24, 60) to 3 (1, 8) for median Lysholm and WOMAC scores, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative outcome scores between patients treated in the acute and chronic phases. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between PCL- and ACL-based multiple-ligament knee injuries. Eighteen (9.3%) patients developed arthrofibrosis requiring reintervention surgery.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrated that single-stage anatomic-based knee ligament reconstructions with immediate postoperative rehabilitation in the setting of sports-related multiligament injuries yielded significantly improved outcomes irrespective of the ligament injury pattern. In addition, there was no difference in outcomes between ACL- and PCL-based injuries in the setting of sports-related multiligament injuries.

Relationship between anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral meniscal root bony attachment: High-resolution 3-T MRI analysis

BACKGROUND

The tibial bony attachments of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the anterolateral meniscal root (ALMR) are very close, and drilling the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction may damage the ALMR attachment. This study investigated the relationship between the tibial attachment of the ACL and ALMR using high-resolution 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects (35.8 ± 13.0 years) had 20 knees scanned using high resolution 3-T MRI. The tibial bony attachments of ACL, ALMR, and the tibia were segmented and three-dimensional models were created. The shape, area, and location of each attachment were evaluated using this model.

RESULTS

The ACL tibial attachment was elliptical in nine knees (45%), C-shaped in nine knees (45%) and triangle in two knees (10%). The mean values of the ACL vs ALMR tibial attachments were as follows: area, 106.2 ± 21.3 vs 56.2 ± 21.3 mm²; length, 16.8 ± 2.0 vs 11.0 ± 1.8 mm; and width, 6.9 ± 1.3 vs 6.6 ± 1.0 mm. The location of the ACL vs ALMR attachment centres was 46.5 ± 1.7% vs 56.5 ± 1.9% in the medial-lateral direction and 36.3 ± 3.6% vs 36.7 ± 3.5% in the anterior-posterior direction. The distance between the ACL and ALMR centres was 8.1 ± 1.3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL and ALMR tibial attachments were individually distinguished using high resolution 3-T MRI. The short distance between both centres of the attachments may suggest that ALMR can be damaged when the tibial tunnel is drilled in ACL reconstruction.

Femoral tunnel placement in single-bundle, remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a posterior trans-septal portal

BACKGROUND

Anatomic tunnel formation and remnant preservation are valuable aspects of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, anatomic landmarks are difficult to observe during remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The aims of this study were to evaluate the: 1) femoral tunnel location created with guidance from the apex of the deep cartilage margin (ADC) and footprint compared to anatomical reference; and 2) relationship between femoral tunnel location and outcomes of ACLR.

METHODS

A total of 109 ACLR patients without revision ACLR, multi-ligament reconstruction, peri-knee fracture, and osteotomy were included. The femoral tunnel was formed at the most proximal corner of the femoral footprint using a posterior trans-septal portal as the viewing portal. The distance from the tunnel center to ADC was measured by computed tomography and arthroscopy. The two measurements were then compared. Finally, femoral tunnel location was compared to the anatomic reference and correlated with the outcomes.

RESULTS

The average distance from ADC to the femoral tunnel center was 7.0 ± 1.4 mm as measured by arthroscopy, and 7.2 ± 2.0 mm using three-dimensional computed tomography. There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods (P = 0.420). Clinical and stability outcomes were significantly improved postoperatively. Clinical outcome was not related to femoral tunnel location; however, stability outcome was related to femoral tunnel location: the more proximally located femoral tunnels showed better stability.

CONCLUSION

The ADC can be a possible landmark in remnant-preserving ACLR using a trans-septal portal. A more proximal femoral tunnel, which is located at the proximal corner of the ACL remnant, can provide stability advantage during remnant-preserving ACLR.

Coronal tibial anteromedial tunnel location has minimal effect on knee biomechanics

PURPOSE

Studies have found anatomic variation in the coronal position of the insertion site of anteromedial (AM) bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) on the tibia, which can lead to questions about tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine how mediolateral placement of the tibial AM graft tunnel in double-bundle ACL reconstructions affects knee biomechanics.

METHODS

Two different types of double-bundle ACL reconstructions were performed. The AM tibial tunnel was placed at either the medial or lateral portion of tibial AM footprint. Nine cadaveric knees were tested with the robotic/universal force-moment sensor system with the use of (1) an 89.0-N anterior tibial load at full extension (FE), 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion and (2) a combined 7.0-Nm valgus torque and 5.0-Nm internal tibial rotation torque at FE, 15°, 30°and 45° of knee flexion.

RESULTS

Both medial (2.6 ± 1.2 mm) and lateral (1.6 ± 0.9 mm) double-bundle reconstructions reduced the anterior tibial translation (ATT) to less than the intact value (3.9 ± 0.7 mm) at FE. At all other flexion angles, there was no significant different in ATT between the intact knee and the reconstructions. At FE, the ATT for the medial AM reconstruction was different from that of the lateral AM construction and closer to the intact ACL value.

CONCLUSION

The coronal tibial placement of the AM tunnel had only a slight effect on knee biomechanics. In patients with differing AM bundle coronal positions, the AM tibial tunnel can be placed anatomically at the native insertion site.

Stereophotogrammetric surface anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament's tibial footprint: Precise osseous structure and distances to arthroscopically-relevant landmarks

BACKGROUND

While femoral tunnel malposition is widely recognized as the main technical error of failed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, tibial tunnel malposition is likely underrecognized and underappreciated.

PURPOSE

To describe more precisely the qualitative and quantitative anatomy of the ACL's tibial attachment in vitro using widely available technology for stereophotogrammetric surface reconstruction, and to test its applicability in vivo.

METHODS

Stereophotogrammetric surface reconstruction was obtained from fourteen proximal tibias of cadaver donors. Measurements of areas and distances from the center of the ACL footprint and the footprint of the obtained bundles to selected arthroscopically-relevant anatomic landmarks were carried out using a three-dimensional design software program, and means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for these measurements. Reference landmarks were tested in three-dimensional models obtained with arthroscopic videos.

MAIN FINDINGS

The osseous footprint of the ACL was described in detail, including its precise elevated limits, size, and shape, with its elevation pattern described as a quarter-turn-staircase-like ridge. Its internal indentations were related to inter-spaces identified as bundle divisions. Distances from the footprint center to arthroscopically relevant landmarks were obtained and compared to its internal structure, yielding a useful X-like landmark pointing to the most accurate placeholder for the ACL footprint's "anatomic" center. Certain structures and reference landmarks described were readily recognized in three-dimensional models from arthroscopic videos.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereophotogrammetric surface reconstruction is an accessible technique for the investigation of anatomic structures in vitro, offering a detailed three-dimensional depiction of the ACL's osseous footprint.

Editorial Commentary: Small Incisions Can Make Big Mistakes: Knee Lateral Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Is All About the Anatomy!

It is becoming increasingly recognized that isolated lateral collateral ligament (LCL) tears are more common than have been previously recognized and that anatomic-based LCL reconstructions have the best outcomes. Although it was believed that posterolateral corner injuries were often missed or mistreated and were given the pneumonic of "the dark side of the knee," we are getting to the point where most of these more severe injuries are being recognized, and it is the isolated LCL injuries that are still less well recognized. Failure to treat LCL tears at the same time as a cruciate ligament reconstruction is a well-known cause of both anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft failure. Therefore, either having the required clinical experience or knowledge, or using a radiographic backup method when one is not sure about the anatomic placement, is essential to correctly perform an LCL reconstruction.

No Difference in the KOOS Quality of Life Subscore Between Anatomic Double-Bundle and Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial With 2 Years' Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The double-bundle reconstruction technique was developed to resemble the properties of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) more closely than the conventional single-bundle technique. The clinical benefit of the operative procedure is controversial, and there is a need for studies with a focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

HYPOTHESIS

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction would be superior to anatomic single-bundle reconstruction regarding the change in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life (QoL) subscore from baseline to 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

According to sample size calculations, 120 patients aged 18 to 40 years with a primary ACL injury of their knee were randomized to the anatomic double-bundle or anatomic single-bundle reconstruction groups. Patients with posterior cruciate ligament, posterolateral corner, or lateral collateral ligament injuries or with established osteoarthritis were excluded. Patients with residual laxity from a coexistent medial collateral ligament injury were excluded. Data were registered at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years. In 24 patients, postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography was performed to verify the positioning of the bundles. The outcome measures were the change in KOOS subscores and the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 subjective score, pivot-shift test result, Lachman test finding, KT-1000 arthrometer measurement, activity level, return-to-sports rate, and osteoarthritic changes on radiographs. A linear mixed model was used for the analysis of all the PROs, including the primary outcome.

RESULTS

The change in the KOOS QoL subscore from baseline to 2-year follow-up was not different between the double- and single-bundle groups (mean change, 29.2 points vs 28.7 points, respectively; -0.5-point difference; 95% CI, -8.4 to 7.4 points; P = .91). Neither were there any differences between the 2 groups in the remaining PROs, knee laxity measurements, or activity levels of the patients. Radiological signs of osteoarthritis were found in 2 patients. Eleven patients had a graft rupture: 8 in the single-bundle group and 3 in the double-bundle group ( P = .16). Three-dimensional computed tomography of the knees verified the positioning of the anteromedial bundle, posterolateral bundle, and single-bundle grafts to be within acceptable limits.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the KOOS QoL subscore, the remaining PROs, knee laxity measurements, or activity levels comparing the double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques. The number of bundles does not seem to influence clinical and subjective outcomes, as long as the tunnels are adequately positioned. Registration: NCT01033188 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores neither the medial pivoting behavior nor the ligament forces of the intact knee in passive flexion

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an accepted treatment for isolated medial osteoarthritis. However, using an improper thickness for the tibial component may contribute to early failure of the prosthesis or disease progression in the unreplaced lateral compartment. Little is known of the effect of insert thickness on both knee kinematics and ligament forces. Therefore, a computational model of the tibiofemoral joint was used to determine how non-conforming, fixed bearing medial UKA affects tibiofemoral kinematics, and tension in the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) during passive knee flexion. Fixed bearing medial UKA could not maintain the medial pivoting that occurred in the intact knee from 0° to 30° of passive flexion. Abnormal anterior-posterior (AP) translations of the femoral condyles relative to the tibia delayed coupled internal tibial rotation, which occurred in the intact knee from 0° to 30° of flexion, but occurred from 30° to 90° of flexion following UKA. Increasing or decreasing tibial insert thickness following medial UKA also failed to restore the medial pivoting behavior of the intact knee despite modulating MCL and ACL forces. Reduced AP constraint in non-conforming medial UKA relative to the intact knee leads to abnormal condylar translations regardless of insert thickness even with intact cruciate and collateral ligaments. This finding suggests that the conformity of the medial compartment as driven by the medial meniscus and articular morphology plays an important role in controlling AP condylar translations in the intact tibiofemoral joint during passive flexion. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1868-1875, 2018.

Anterior laxity, lateral tibial slope, and in situ ACL force differentiate knees exhibiting distinct patterns of motion during a pivoting event: A human cadaveric study

Knee instability following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture compromises function and increases risk of injury to the cartilage and menisci. To understand the biomechanical function of the ACL, previous studies have primarily reported the net change in tibial position in response to multiplanar torques, which generate knee instability. In contrast, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 13 consecutively tested cadaveric knees and found distinct motion patterns, defined as the motion of the tibia as it translates and rotates from its unloaded, initial position to its loaded, final position. Specifically, ACL-sectioned knees either subluxated anteriorly under valgus torque (VL-subluxating) (5 knees) or under a combination of valgus and internal rotational torques (VL/IR-subluxating) (8 knees), which were applied at 15 and 30° flexion using a robotic manipulator. The purpose of this study was to identify differences between these knees that could be driving the two distinct motion patterns. Therefore, we asked whether parameters of bony geometry and tibiofemoral laxity (known risk factors of non-contact ACL injury) as well as in situ ACL force, when it was intact, differentiate knees in these two groups. VL-subluxating knees exhibited greater sagittal slope of the lateral tibia by 3.6 ± 2.4° (p = 0.003); less change in anterior laxity after ACL-sectioning during a simulated Lachman test by 3.2 ± 3.2 mm (p = 0.006); and, at the peak applied valgus torque (no internal rotation torque), higher posteriorly directed, in situ ACL force by 13.4 ± 11.3 N and 12.0 ± 11.6 N at 15° and 30° of flexion, respectively (both p ≤ 0.03). These results may suggest that subgroups of knees depend more on their ACL to control lateral tibial subluxation in response to uniplanar valgus and multiplanar valgus and internal rotation torques as mediated by anterior laxity and bony morphology.

Quantitative Anatomic Analysis of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Complex of the Elbow

Background

A more detailed assessment of the anatomy of the entire medial ulnar collateral ligament complex (MUCLC) is desired as the rate of medial elbow reconstruction surgery continues to rise.

Purpose

To quantify the anatomy of the MUCLC, including the anterior bundle (AB), posterior bundle (PB), and transverse ligament (TL).

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

Ten unpaired, fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows underwent 3-dimensional (3D) digitization and computed tomography with 3D reconstruction. Ligament footprint areas and geometries, distances to key bony landmarks, and isometry were determined. A surgeon digitized the visual center of each footprint, and this location was compared with the geometric centroid calculated from the outline of the digitized footprint.

Results

The mean surface area of the AB was 324.2 mm², with an origin footprint of 32.3 mm² and an elongated insertional footprint of 187.6 mm² (length, 29.7 mm). The mean area of the PB was 116.6 mm² (origin, 25.9 mm²; insertion, 15.8 mm²), and the mean surface area of the TL was 134.5 mm² (origin, 21.2 mm²; insertion, 16.7 mm²). The geometric centroids of all footprints could be predicted within 0.8 to 1.3 mm, with the exception of the AB insertion centroid, which was 7.6 mm distal to the perceived center at the apex of the sublime tubercle. While the PB remained relatively isometric from 0° to 90° of flexion (P = .606), the AB lengthened by 2.2 mm (P < .001).

Conclusion

Contrary to several historical reports, the insertional footprint of the AB was larger, elongated, and tapered. The TL demonstrated a previously unrecognized expansive soft tissue insertion directly onto the AB, and additional analysis of the biomechanical contribution of this structure is needed.

Clinical Relevance

These findings may serve as a foundation for future study of the MUCLC and help refine current surgical reconstruction techniques.

In situ force in the anterior cruciate ligament, the lateral collateral ligament, and the anterolateral capsule complex during a simulated pivot shift test

The role of the anterolateral capsule complex in knee rotatory stability remains controversial. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), the anterolateral capsule, the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), and the forces transmitted between each region of the anterolateral capsule in response to a simulated pivot shift test. A robotic testing system applied a simulated pivot shift test continuously from full extension to 90° of flexion to intact cadaveric knees (n = 7). To determine the magnitude of the in situ forces, kinematics of the intact knee were replayed in position control mode after the following procedures were performed: (i) ACL transection; (ii) capsule separation; (iii) anterolateral capsule transection; and (iii) LCL transection. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed to compare in situ forces between each knee state (*p < 0.05). The in situ force in the ACL was significantly greater than the forces transmitted between each region of the anterolateral capsule at 5° and 15° of flexion but significantly lower at 60°, 75°, and 90° of flexion. This study demonstrated that the ACL is the primary rotatory stabilizer at low flexion angles during a simulated pivot shift test in the intact knee, but the anterolateral capsule plays an important secondary role at flexion angles greater than 60°. Furthermore, the contribution of the "anterolateral ligament" to rotatory knee stability in this study was negligible during a simulated pivot shift test. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:847-853, 2018.