Relationship Between Humeral Retroversion and Length of Baseball Career Before the Age of 16 Years

The Role of Humeral Torsion on Glenohumeral Rotation in Injured Baseball Players

Background

Differences in rotational range of motion (ROM) compared to humeral retrotorsion (HRT)-corrected rotational ROM exist in healthy baseball athletes, but it is unclear whether these differences exist in a pathological population.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to determine if there are disparities between objectively measured differences in ROM and HRT-corrected deficits in injured baseball players. It was hypothesized that disparities would exist between (1) the side-to-side difference in glenohumeral external rotation (GER) and the HRT-corrected glenohumeral external rotation deficit (GERD) and (2) the side-to-side difference in glenohumeral internal rotation (GIR) and the HRT-corrected glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD).

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Data from 172 baseball players with shoulder or elbow injuries (45 shoulder, 127 elbow) were reviewed in July 2023. GER and GIR were measured on the injured and noninjured sides of all players, and diagnostic ultrasound was used to measure HRT. Dependent t tests were run to compare the side-to side differences in GER and GIR with the HRT-corrected GERD and GIRD, respectively.

Results

In the players with a shoulder injury, there was a significant disparity between the side-to-side difference in GER and the HRT-corrected GERD (2°± 14° vs -13°± 15°, respectively) and between the side-to-side difference in GIR and the HRT-corrected GIRD (-14°± 8° vs 2°± 9°, respectively) (P < .001 for both). Similarly, players with an elbow injury had significant disparities between the side-to-side difference in GER and the HRT-corrected GERD (6°± 9° vs -10°± 9°, respectively) and between the side-to-side difference in GIR and the HRT-corrected GIRD (-12°± 8° vs 4°± 10°, respectively) (P < .001 for both).

Conclusion

The results supported our hypothesis that there were disparities between objectively measured differences in GER and GIR compared with the HRT-corrected GERD and GIRD in injured baseball players. Consideration must be given to osseous adaptations that occur at the glenohumeral joint when evaluating and treating this population.

Side-to-side variability in the femoral neck anteversion angle: A study of the Japanese population with osteonecrosis of the femoral head

BACKGROUND

Side-to-side variability in the femoral neck anteversion angle (FA) reportedly varies from 0.0° to 17.3°. To investigate the side-to-side variability in the FA and the relationship between the FA and the morphology of the acetabulum in the Japanese population, we performed a three-dimensional computed tomography (CT)-based study involving patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

CT data were obtained from 170 nondysplastic hips of 85 patients with ONFH. The FA and acetabular coverage parameters, including the acetabular anteversion angle, acetabular inclination angle, and acetabular sector angle in the anterior, superior, and posterior directions, were measured using three-dimensional CT. The distribution of the side-to-side variability in the FA was evaluated separately for each of the five degrees.

RESULTS

The mean side-to-side variability in the FA was 6.7° ± 5.3° (range, 0.2°-26.2°). The distribution of the side-to-side variability in the FA was 0.0°-5.0° in 41 patients (48.2%), 5.1°-10.0° in 25 patients (29.4%), 10.1°-15.0° in 13 patients (15.3%), 15.1°-20.0° in 4 patients (4.7%), and >20.1° in 2 patients (2.4%). There was a weak negative correlation between the FA and anterior acetabular sector angle (r = -0.282, P < 0.001) and a very weak positive correlation between the FA and acetabular anteversion angle (r = 0.181, P < 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

The mean side-to-side variability in the FA was 6.7° ± 5.3° (range, 0.2°-26.2°) in Japanese nondysplastic hips, and about 20% of the patients had a side-to-side variability of >10°.

Adaptive pathology: new insights into the physical examination and imaging of the thrower's shoulder and elbow

Throwing with high velocity requires extremes of glenohumeral external rotation of the abducted arm where particularly high forces in the shoulder and elbow are endured. Repeated throwing leads to dominant-arm bony remodeling of the humerus, glenoid, and elbow, and multiple soft tissue changes that would be considered abnormal. Many of these features are thought to be adaptive and protective. The purpose of this work is to (1) define the concept of adaptive pathology; (2) review the mechanics of the throwing motion; (3) review pertinent physical examination and imaging findings seen in asymptomatic throwers' shoulders and elbows and describe how these changes develop and may be adaptive-allowing the thrower to perform at high levels; and then (4) review the principles of surgical treatment in the throwing athletes, which should focus on reducing symptoms, but not necessarily restoring the thrower's anatomy to normal.

Bilateral Humeral Retrotorsion Angle Measured Using an Ultrasound-Assisted Technique in Asian Baseball Players

Background

Repetitive pitching is thought to restrict the physiological derotation process of the humeral head. Some studies have reported that side-to-side differences in the humeral retrotorsion angle (ΔHRA) occur between the ages of 9 and 11 years in baseball players. However, it remains unclear whether the ΔHRA in Asian baseball players depends on pitching skill or competitive level.

Purpose

To evaluate the ΔHRA in Asian collegiate and professional baseball players and to determine the effects of pitching activity on the physiological derotation process of the humeral head.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We evaluated 128 shoulders in 64 Asian baseball players who were stratified into 4 groups as follows: 13 professional pitchers; 9 professional fielders; 8 collegiate pitchers; and 34 collegiate fielders. The throwing and nonthrowing side HRA was assessed using an ultrasound-assisted technique, and the ΔHRA was compared among the 4 groups. In addition, Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between ΔHRA and glenohumeral range of motion, baseball starting age, and fastball velocity in pitchers.

Results

The HRA was significantly greater in the throwing arm than in the nonthrowing arm in each group, with no significant differences among the groups. There was no correlation between ΔHRA and range of motion or fastball velocity. There was a significant negative correlation between baseball starting age and ΔHRA in professional fielders (r = -0.633; P = .036).

Conclusion

The findings of the present study provide evidence that in Asian baseball players, the HRA was significantly greater in the throwing arm than in the nonthrowing arm. There were no clear associations between HRA and pitching ability or competitive level.

Increased external rotation related to the soft tissues is associated with pathologic internal impingement in high-school baseball players

BACKGROUND

Changes in soft-tissue structures such as anterior laxity and posterior tightness are thought to contribute to the development of pathologic internal impingement in baseball players. Although side-to-side differences in shoulder rotational range of motion (ROM) is commonly used in clinical practice to quantify the soft-tissue changes, the ROM does not accurately reflect the soft-tissue changes because the ROM is affected not only by the soft tissues, but also by the bone. Increased retroversion of the humeral head is often observed in the dominant shoulder of throwing athletes. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the soft-tissue-related (STR) ROM and pathologic internal impingement in baseball players.

METHODS

Bilateral humeral retroversion and ranges of glenohumeral external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) were investigated in 81 high-school baseball players. The players were divided into two groups: the internal impingement group (19 players) and the control group (62 players). Humeral retroversion was measured using the ultrasound-assisted technique to assess the bone-related ER and IR. The STR ER and IR were defined as subtracting the amount of humeral retroversion from the measured ER and IR.

RESULTS

The side-to-side difference (throwing shoulder - nonthrowing shoulder) in humeral retroversion showed no significant difference between the internal impingement group (6° ± 10°) and control group (11° ± 11°) (P = .064). The side-to-side difference in STR ER was significantly greater in the internal impingement group (12° ± 12°) than that in the control group (1° ± 14°) (P = .002). No significant difference was observed in the side-to-side difference in STR IR between the internal impingement group (-7° ± 16°) and control group (-5° ± 15°) (P = .696). Pathologic internal impingement was significantly associated with the side-to-side difference of STR ER (odds ratio, 1.06 for increase of 1°; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.11; P = .008).

CONCLUSION

In high-school baseball players, the increased STR ER in the throwing shoulder may be associated with pathologic internal impingement. An increase of 10° in side-to-side difference in STR ER would increase the risk of pathologic internal impingement by 1.8 times.

Evaluation of glenohumeral range of motion and humeral retroversion at ages after major change and differences in wrestlers

PURPOSE

This study aimed to present the change in humeral retroversion (HR) angle (HRA) that occurs in childhood and young adulthood and the potential developmental difference that is observed in wrestlers.

METHODS

HRA of dominant and non-dominant shoulders (DSHRA and NDSHRA, respectively) were measured using ultrasonography in a group of 30 wrestlers who started wrestling before the age of 13 years (Group 1), a group of 30 young adults, aged between 16-20 years, who were not actively engaged in any branch of overhead sports (Group 2) and a group of children aged between 11-13 years and not actively engaged in any branch of overhead sports (Group 3). Range of motion (ROM) degrees of dominant and non-dominant shoulders in all groups were compared within each group and between the groups.

RESULTS

DSHRA (mean: 88.73°, 88.93° and 89.40°) values were significantly higher than NDSHRA (mean: 81.13°, 81.83° and 84.37°) values (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0,05) in Groups I, II and III, respectively. Internal rotation and total ROM degrees of the dominant shoulder in Group 1 and 3 were higher than those in Group 2.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant change in terms of HRA in people aged between 11-13 and 16-20 years because of natural development or wrestling. DSHRA values are higher than NDSHRA ones. In contrast to the shoulders of throwers, the shoulders of wrestlers are characterized by an increase in internal rotation, described as "Wrestler's shoulder."

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Relationship of clinical measures with humeral torsion in young adults: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Humeral retroversion alters range of motion and has been linked to injury risk. Clinically,palpation of the bicipital groove is used to quantify humeral torsion, but the accuracy of this procedure has not been fully examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between clinical and diagnostic ultrasound (US) assessment of humeral torsion while considering shoulder position of the participant and clinical expertise of the examiner.

METHODS

Seventeen participants (34 shoulders, 16/17 right handed, 10/17 history of throwing) were recruited. US was assessed by an experienced assessor. Two clinical assessments of humeral torsion were performed by two assessors of different experience (expert and novice). Humeral torsion was assessed at 90 degrees shoulder abduction (Palp90) and 45 degrees shoulder abduction (Palp45). Within assessor intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC (3, 1) were calculated. Correlation coefficients (Pearson's) were generated to determine relationship between clinical and US examination findings.

RESULTS

Intra-rater reliability for clinical tests were good (ICCs .73 - .92) for both raters. Of the palpation tests, only the expert assessor was significantly correlated to the US measurement (p<.001) at Palp45 (r = .64) and Palp90 (r = .62). For the expert, there was a significantly lower angle calculated for Palp45 compared to Palp90 (p<.001).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of both palpation methods for assessing humeral retrotorsion may depend on the training background of the assessor. Further, the glenohumeral position of the patient during palpation should be consistent for the purposes of repeated testing.

Effect of Younger Starting Pitching Age on Humeral Retrotorsion in Baseball Pitchers With an Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury

BACKGROUND

Increased humeral retrotorsion (HRT) has been found to be a risk factor for ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears in baseball players. Recent work has demonstrated the age of 11 years as a potential watershed age for HRT development.

HYPOTHESIS

In a group of baseball pitchers with UCL injuries, athletes who started pitching before the age of 10 years will demonstrate significantly more dominant limb humeral retrotorsion (DHRT) when compared with a group of baseball pitchers who reported starting pitching at 10 years or older.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 84 baseball pitchers with a diagnosed UCL injury were divided into 2 groups based upon the age at which participants began pitching: 33 players reporting a starting pitching age of 10 years or older (group 1) were compared with 51 baseball pitchers reporting a starting pitching age under 10 years (group 2). Participants' DHRT and nondominant limb humeral retrotorsion (NDHRT) were measured using diagnostic ultrasound. Independent t tests were run to compare mean group differences of all patient data, starting pitching age, age at time of injury, DHRT, NDHRT, and humeral retrotorsion difference (HRTdiff).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups with regard to age at time of injury, height, weight, or playing years' experience. There was a statistically significant difference in the participant-reported starting pitching age. Significant differences between groups were noted for DHRT (group 1: 20.0°± 9.4°, group 2: 14.5°± 10.3°, P = .015) and for NDHRT (group 1: 38.6°± 8.8°, group 2: 32.9°± 9.5°, P = .007). No significant differences between groups were found for HRTdiff (P = .940).

CONCLUSION

Baseball pitchers with a UCL injury who reported a starting pitching age younger than 10 years demonstrated significantly greater DHRT and NDHRT when compared with UCL-injured baseball pitchers who reported a starting pitching age at 10 years or later. The results of this study demonstrate that a younger starting pitching age results in increased HRT in players with UCL injuries.

Relationship between humeral retroversion and baseball positions during elementary and junior-high school

BACKGROUND

Humeral retroversion is greater in the dominant shoulder than in the nondominant shoulder in baseball players. However, the effect of different baseball positions during childhood on humeral retroversion remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the following: (1) the relationship between humeral retroversion and baseball positions played during elementary and junior-high schools; (2) the association between humeral retroversion and the prevalence of pain during the medical checkup and self-reported history of injuries in the dominant shoulder or elbow.

METHODS

We enrolled 149 male high-school baseball players who started playing baseball in elementary school. The subjects were classified into 3 groups according to their baseball positions in elementary and junior-high schools. All participants completed questionnaires regarding their current and past positions, current incidence and history of injuries in their shoulder or elbow joints, and the age they started playing baseball. Shoulder range of motion, humeral retroversion on ultrasonographic-assisted measurement, and the association between humeral retroversion and shoulder and elbow pain were evaluated.

RESULTS

Humeral retroversion was significantly greater in the dominant shoulder than in the nondominant shoulder in all groups (P < .001). In addition, humeral retroversion in the dominant shoulder was significantly greater in players who were pitchers in both elementary and junior-high schools than in those who were fielders during both periods (96.2° and 89.4°, respectively; P = .02). Humeral retroversion in the dominant shoulder was positively correlated (P = .005, r = 0.23) with the length of career as a pitcher during elementary and junior-high schools. Humeral retroversion was not correlated with the prevalence of pain during the medical checkup or self-reported history of injuries in the dominant shoulder or elbow (P values ranging from 0.09-0.99).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that playing baseball as a pitcher during elementary school and junior-high school affects the increase in humeral retroversion in the dominant shoulder. Increased humeral retroversion in the dominant shoulder by repetitive throwing motion is an adaptive change, rather than a pathologic change.

The Relationship Between Humeral Torsion and Arm Injury in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Humeral torsion (HT) has been linked to various injuries and benefits. However, the exact interplay between HT, shoulder range of motion (ROM), competition level differences, and injury risk is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between HT, ROM, and injury risk in baseball players. Secondarily, to determine HT based on competition level.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until November 4, 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria consisted of (1) HT measurements and (2) arm injury or shoulder ROM.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers recorded patient demographics, competition level, HT, shoulder ROM, and injury data.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies were included. There was no difference between baseball players with shoulder and elbow injuries and noninjured players (side-to-side HT difference: mean difference [MD], 1.75 [95% CI, -1.83 to 2.18]; dominant arm: MD, 0.17 [95% CI, -1.83 to 2.18]). Meta-regression determined that for every 1° increase in shoulder internal rotation (IR), there was a subsequent increase of 0.65° in HT (95% CI, 0.28 to 1.02). HT did not explain external rotation (ER ROM: 0.19 [95% CI, -0.24 to 0.61]) or horizontal adduction (HA ROM: 0.18 [95% CI, -0.46 to 0.82]). There were no differences between HT at the high school, college, or professional levels.

CONCLUSION

No relationship was found between HT and injury risk. However, HT explained 65% of IR ROM but did not explain ER ROM or HA ROM. There were no differences in HT pertaining to competition level. The majority of IR may be nonmodifiable. Treatment to restore and maintain clinical IR may be important, especially in players with naturally greater torsion. HT adaptation may occur prior to high school, which can assist in decisions regarding adolescent baseball participation.

Humeral Retroversion and Injury Risk After Proximal Humeral Epiphysiolysis (Little Leaguer's Shoulder)

BACKGROUND

The increased humeral retroversion on the dominant side of throwing athletes is thought to result from repetitive throwing motion. Little Leaguer's shoulder-a rotational stress fracture of the proximal humeral epiphyseal plate-may influence the risk of humeral retroversion and injury of the shoulder or elbow joint.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of Little Leaguer's shoulder on humeral retroversion and the rates of shoulder and elbow injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

10 high school baseball players (average age, 16.6 years; range, 16-18 years) who had experienced Little Leaguer's shoulder during elementary or junior high school (average age, 12.6 years; range, 11-15 years) were enrolled in the study. As a control group, 22 high school baseball players (average age, 16.9 years; range, 16-18 years) who had never had any shoulder or elbow injury during elementary and junior high school were included. Humeral retroversion on ultrasonographic measurement, shoulder range of motion, and rates of shoulder and elbow injuries were evaluated.

RESULTS

Humeral retroversion was significantly greater on the dominant side than on the nondominant side in both players with Little Leaguer's shoulder (dominant, 104°± 8°; nondominant, 84°± 12°; P < .001) and controls (dominant, 91°± 13°; nondominant, 81°± 10°; P < .001). In the dominant shoulder, humeral retroversion was greater in the Little Leaguer's shoulder group than in the control group (P = .008). When the effects of humeral retroversion were excluded, maximal external rotation was significantly less in the dominant shoulder than in the nondominant shoulder in the Little Leaguer's shoulder group (by 11°± 12°, P = .02), whereas no significant difference was found between dominant (110°± 11°) and nondominant (111°± 13°) shoulders in the control group (P = .64). The rates of shoulder and elbow pain were significantly higher in the Little Leaguer's shoulder group (shoulder pain 80%, elbow pain 70%) than in the control group (shoulder pain 9%, P < .001; elbow pain 32%, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Humeral retroversion was increased in baseball players without any history of shoulder or elbow injury during elementary and junior high school and was further increased in players who had had Little Leaguer's shoulder. Increased humeral retroversion after Little Leaguer's shoulder may be a risk factor for future shoulder or elbow injury.

Relationship between bilateral humeral retroversion angle and starting baseball age in skeletally mature baseball players-existence of watershed age

BACKGROUND

Repetitive pitching in childhood was thought to restrict the physiological derotation process of the humeral head. Some studies reported that the side-to-side differences of humeral retroversion in baseball players occurred between the age of 9 and 11 years. The present study investigated the relationship between bilateral humeral retroversion angle and starting baseball age in skeletally mature baseball players.

METHODS

One hundred and seventeen male baseball players, who belonged to a college or amateur team, were investigated. Bilateral humeral retroversion was assessed using an ultrasound-assisted technique as described by previous studies. All players were divided into four groups: players who had started playing baseball before the age of 6 years, between 7 and 8 years, between 9 and 10 years and after 11 years. Bilateral humeral retroversion angle was compared among the four starting age groups.

RESULTS

All players started playing baseball between 5 and 12 years. Comparing the throwing arm, humeral retroversion in starting age group 11-12 (72°) was significantly smaller than the other 3 groups (81°, 82°, and 80° for groups 5-6, 7-8, and 9-10, respectively). Comparing the non-throwing arm revealed no significant differences among the 4 starting age groups (71°, 72°, 70°, and 66° for groups 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, and 11-12, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletally mature baseball players who started playing baseball after 11 years had significantly smaller humeral retroversion in the throwing arm than those who started baseball before 11 years.