Rehabilitation Protocols After Isolated Meniscal Repair: A Systematic Review

Functional testing following isolated meniscus repair may help to identify patients who need additional physical therapy prior to a return to activity

OBJECTIVES

Functional testing (FT), commonly used to evaluate dynamic knee function and provide objective information about how well a patient, has progressed in rehabilitation following an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of the study was to determine whether a functional test could be used as an assessment tool for return to activity following isolated meniscus repair.

METHODS

The results of FT completed between 80 and 150 days post-operation (representing 4-months post-operative) in isolated meniscal repair patients were analysed for the involved limb, uninvolved limb, and limb symmetry index (LSI). Involved limb performance and LSI on FT were also recorded for a matched cohort of patients who underwent an isolated ACL reconstruction between 151 and 220 days post-operation (representing 6-months post-operative). The meniscus cohort was compared to the ACL cohort.

RESULTS

The meniscus cohort (n ​= ​26) performed well (LSI of 88% or better) on all functional test exercises, including all hop tests. There were patients in the meniscus cohort who did not achieve 90% LSI on the FT at 4 months. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the tests between the meniscus and ACL (n ​= ​39) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

A majority of isolated meniscal repair patients perform well on FT by 4 months post-operatively and similar to patients undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction at 6 months post-operatively. Not all patients performed well on FT at 4 months post-operatively; however so, there may be a role for FT in isolated meniscal repair patients, and those patients may need further physical therapy prior to a return to sports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Retrospective cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Management of Meniscus Pathology with Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize current clinical knowledge on the prevalence and types of meniscus pathology seen with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, as well as surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and rehabilitation following operative management of these pathologies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Meniscus pathology with concomitant ACL injury is relatively common, with reports of meniscus pathology identified in 21-64% of operative ACL injuries. These concomitant injuries have been associated with increased age and body mass index. Lateral meniscus pathology is more common in acute ACL injury, while medial meniscus pathology is more typical in chronic ACL deficiency. Meniscus tear patterns associated with concomitant ACL injury include meniscus root tears, lateral meniscus oblique radial tears of the posterior horn (14%), and ramp lesions of the medial meniscus (8-24%). These meniscal pathologies with concomitant ACL injury are associated with increased rotational laxity and meniscal extrusion. There is a paucity of comparative studies to determine the optimal meniscus repair technique, as well as rehabilitation protocol, depending on specific tear pattern, location, and ACL reconstruction technique. There has been a substantial increase in recent publications demonstrating the importance of meniscus repair at the time of ACL repair or reconstruction to restore knee biomechanics and reduce the risk of progressive osteoarthritic degeneration. Through these studies, there has been a growing understanding of the meniscus tear patterns commonly identified or nearly missed during ACL reconstruction. Surgical management of meniscal pathology with concomitant ACL injury implements the same principles as utilized in the setting of isolated meniscus repair alone: anatomic reduction, biologic preparation and augmentation, and circumferential compression. Advances in repair techniques have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes, and the ability to restore and preserve the meniscus in pathologies previously deemed irreparable. Further research to determine the optimal surgical technique for specific tear patterns, as well as rehabilitation protocols for meniscus pathology with concomitant ACL injury, is warranted.

Editorial Commentary: Complications After Meniscal Surgery Are Rare and Generally Associated With Medical Comorbidity

Meniscal tears are prevalent and frequently require surgical intervention. This injury affects younger, active patients after acute trauma. Meniscal repair is often indicated. Degenerative tears are more common in elderly patients and are generally treated with partial meniscectomy. Other factors such as chronicity, stability, tear type, and associated injuries may also play a role in the treatment algorithm. In terms of complications, both procedures are generally safe, with a complication rate approximating 1%, but adverse effects such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, surgical-site infection, readmission, and reoperation can occur. Complications are more common in elderly patients. Moreover, recent research shows that complications are associated with medical comorbidities, with smoking, and with longer operating times.

Donor Limb Functional Restoration via a Novel Clinical Care Pathway following Fibula Free Flap Harvest for Head and Neck Reconstruction

Patients undergoing head and neck skeletal reconstruction (HNR) often require free tissue transfer from the extremities to ensure proper restoration of form and function. This requires a team-based, highly reliable medical system centered around the patient needs. Surgical intervention across multiple sites and harvesting of donor tissue results in short- and long-term physical impairments. There is a paucity of research objectively measuring impairments resulting from the graft donor site. There is a lack of research that objectively measures impairments and protocols for the management of these patients postoperatively. Patients undergo little, if any, formal approach to dealing with the vast impairments, which are sequelae to this surgery. This leads to large discrepancies in proposed functional progressions, return to duty timelines, and utilization of rehabilitative resources. At a major military medical center, an innovative clinical care pathway for patients undergoing HNR using free tissue transfer was implemented using a multidisciplinary model that focuses on early engagement with rehabilitation. This model, paired with a single surgery, will attempt to return service members to duty months earlier than the traditional approach. This report describes the conceptual framework and implementation of a new criteria-based, multidisciplinary clinical care pathway for HNR patients. The collaboration amongst the multidisciplinary care team has optimized the holistic health of the patient and communication with their support network, yielding faster return to normalization of daily life activities. The long-term goal is to further develop and formalize this pathway to best serve this patient population.

[Current approach in the follow-up treatment of joint-preserving operations on the knee joint in German-speaking countries]

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative follow-up after joint-preserving knee surgery involves conventional physiotherapy as well as other approaches and devices such as CPM and CAM splints, TENS devices, BFR exercise, prehabilitation, and digital health applications. The aim of this survey was to investigate current standards, trends and control methods in postoperative care to identify fields of concern and to compare them with the current literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a structured anonymous online survey of specialists in orthopaedics and trauma surgery listed by the German-speaking Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery (AGA). The questionnaire included 36 closed-ended questions on the follow-up of joint-preserving surgery of the knee joint.

RESULTS

Questionnaires from 528 participants with long-term professional experience (86.6% with more than 10 years) were analysed. Standardised post-treatment schemes are used by 97.2% and their evidence is estimated to be high (59.1%) / very high (14.8%). Problems of rehabilitation are seen in 10-20% of cases by 87.3% (persistent muscular atrophy 30.9%). After reconstructive surgery, CPM splints (70.1%), CAM splints (42.1%), orthoses (85.0%) and TENS devices (40.0%) are prescribed. More potent approaches for the treatment of postoperative muscle deficits are desired by 89.4%. BFR exercise is known by 41.7% and is used regularly by 8%. Communication with treating physiotherapists is infrequent (written: 27.5%). Digital rehabilitation management would be supported by 83.3%; 22.7% are not aware of digital health applications. 87.9% of participants believe that prehabilitation can affect postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Follow-up of knee joint-preserving surgeries is usually standardised and regularly reviewed for up-to-date evidence. The evidence for recommendations made is considered high. Orthoses are usually used after reconstructive surgery, persistent muscle atrophy is a major problem, BFR training is only known to a limited extent, and there is currently a lack of standardised training protocols. Communication with physiotherapists needs to be improved. Digital rehabilitation management is rarely used but would be supported by the majority of surgeons.

Knee extension deficit during gait and knee extensor weakness persisting after saucerization and repair of discoid lateral meniscus tears

BACKGROUND

Physical function and knee kinematics recovery after discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) tear surgery are essential for a better prognosis. However, these alterations remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate changes in physical function and knee kinematics following saucerization and DLM tear repair.

METHODS

We enrolled 16 patients who underwent saucerization and DLM tear repair. Postoperative changes in knee kinematics during gait, and physical function, were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The peak flexion angle of the operated limb during weight acceptance was significantly higher than that of the contralateral limb at 3 (operated limb: 34.6 ± 8.9°, contralateral limb: 23.7 ± 8.3°; P < 0.01) and 6 months (operated limb: 32.1 ± 9.7°, contralateral limb: 24.6 ± 8.2°; P = 0.03) postoperatively, but not at 12 months (operated limb: 27.1 ± 7.1°, contralateral limb: 23.1 ± 9.5°; P = 0.22) postoperatively. The knee extensor strength of the operated limb was significantly lower than that of the contralateral limb at 3 (operated limb: 1.00 ± 0.59 Nm/kg, contralateral limb: 1.37 ± 0.59 Nm/kg; P = 0.01), 6 (operated limb: 1.22 ± 0.55 Nm/kg, contralateral limb: 1.48 ± 0.60 Nm/kg; P < 0.01), and 12 months (operated limb: 1.39 ± 0.57 Nm/kg, contralateral limb: 1.55 ± 0.64 Nm/kg; P = 0.04) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Knee extension deficits and extensor weakness persisted at 6 months after saucerization and repair of DLM tears. Postoperative rehabilitation should be focused on knee extension function.

Influence of Graft Type and Meniscal Involvement on Short-Term Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT

The purpose of this study was to compare short-term clinical outcomes between meniscus procedures performed with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), ACLR (ACLR-only), ACLR with meniscectomy/resection (ACLR-resect), and ACLR with meniscal repair (ACLR-repair) for bone patellar tendon bone grafts (BPTB) and hamstring tendon grafts, separately.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a controlled laboratory setting as part of a large point-of-care collaborative research program.

METHODS

This study included 314 participants (168 females; mean [SD]: age, 19.7 [4.8]) with primary unilateral ACLR with a BPTB or hamstring tendon. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on meniscal procedure (ACLR-only, ACLR-resect, and ACLR-repair). Postsurgical testing included: isokinetic assessment of knee extension and flexion, single-leg hop tests, and patient-reported outcomes. Multivariate analysis of covariance compared differences between meniscal procedures on the battery of tests, and for each statistically significant variable an analysis of covariance assessed the effect of meniscal procedure within each graft type. Chi-square analysis assessed the influence of meniscal procedure on tests' pass rates defined as 90% of limb symmetry index.

RESULTS

BPTB: ACLR-only had greater hamstring strength than ACLR-resect (P = .05) and ACLR-repair (P = .005). ACLR-only had the highest proportion of participants to pass the hamstring strength test (P = .02). Hamstring tendon: ACLR-only (P = .03) and ACLR-resect (P = .003) had higher International Knee Documentation Committee scale scores than ACLR-repair. There was a significant difference in the proportion of participants who scored >90% limb symmetry index on the timed hop test (P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of meniscal repair on clinical outcomes is dependent on the graft choice. Following an ACLR with BPTB and a meniscal procedure, hamstring function should be more closely monitored for optimal short-term recovery.

What Do Patients Encounter When Searching Online About Meniscal Surgery? An Analysis of Internet Trends

Background

Many patients use the internet to learn about their orthopaedic conditions and find answers to their common questions. However, the sources and quality of information available to patients regarding meniscal surgery have not been fully evaluated.

Purpose

To determine the most frequently searched questions associated with meniscal surgery based on question type and topic, as well as to assess the website source type and quality.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

The following search terms were entered into a web search (www.google.com) using a clean-install browser: "meniscal tear,""meniscus repair,""meniscectomy,""knee scope,""meniscus surgery," and "knee arthroscopy." The Rothwell classification system was used to categorize questions and sort them into 1 of 13 topics relevant to meniscal surgery. Websites were also categorized by source into groups. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (medians and interquartile ranges [IQRs]) were used to measure website quality.

Results

A total of 337 unique questions associated with 234 websites were extracted and categorized. The most popular questions were "What is the fastest way to recover from meniscus surgery?" and "What happens if a meniscus tear is left untreated?" Academic websites were associated more commonly with diagnosis questions (41.9%, P < .01). Commercial websites were associated more commonly with cost (71.4%, P = .03) and management (47.6%, P = .02). Government websites addressed a higher proportion of questions regarding timeline of recovery (22.2%, P < .01). Websites associated with medical practices were associated more commonly with risks/complications (43.8%, P = .01) while websites associated with single surgeons were associated more commonly with pain (19.4%, P = .03). Commercial and academic websites had the highest median JAMA benchmark scores (4 [IQR, 3-4] and 3 [IQR, 2-4], respectively) while websites associated with a single surgeon or categorized as "other" had the lowest scores (1 [IQR 1-2] and 1 [IQR 1-1.5], respectively).

Conclusion

Our study found that the most common questions regarding meniscal surgery were associated with diagnosis of meniscal injury, followed by activities and restrictions after meniscal surgery. Academic websites were associated significantly with diagnosis questions. The highest quality websites were commercial and academic websites.

Short-term fear of movement improves less after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with concomitant meniscus repair

BACKGROUND

Psychological response is important in return-to-sport decisions for athletes recovering from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to compare psychological response after ACLR with a concomitant meniscus repair compared to isolated ACLR.

METHODS

Thirty-five individuals completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return-to-Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale before ACLR and 2, 4, and 6 months after ACLR. Participants were dichotomized based on presence of concomitant meniscus repair (Yes/No). Separate group X time repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted for both scales.

RESULTS

Participants were 65.7% female, 19.1 ± 4.7 years old with BMI of 24.9 ± 4.4 kg/m2. Sixteen individuals had an isolated ACLR with 19 individuals having an ACLR with concomitant meniscus repair. For the TSK, there was a group × time interaction effect(p = 0.028), with improvement in TSK scores for the isolated ACLR group (ACLR:2 months = 24.8 ± 3.7; 4 months = 22.0 ± 5.7; 6 months: 19.9 ± 5.9; Meniscus Repair:2 months = 25.5 ± 4.7; 4 months = 24.1 ± 5.0; 6 months: 23.8 ± 4.7). Six months after ACLR, TSK scores were worse in the meniscus repair group(p = 0.036). For the ACL-RSI, there was no interaction(p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant meniscus repair with ACLR results in less post-operative improvement in kinesiophobia through 6 months after ACLR compared to isolated ACLR.

Tough gel adhesive is an effective method for meniscal repair in a bovine cadaveric study

PURPOSE

To test tough gel adhesives to repair meniscus tears under relevant loading conditions and determine if they have adequate biomechanical properties to repair meniscus tears in a bovine cadaveric study.

METHODS

Cyclic compression tests on 24 dissected bovine knees were performed. The tough gel adhesive was used either as an adhesive patch or as a coating bonded onto commercially available surgical sutures. Forty-eight menisci were tested in this study; 24 complete radial tears and 24 bucket-handle tears. After preconditioning, the specimens underwent 100 cycles of compression, (800 N/0.5 Hz) on an Instron© machine and the size of the gaps measured. One third of the menisci were repaired with pristine sutures, one third with adhesive patches, and one third with sutures coated in adhesive gel. The size of the gaps was compared after 100 and 500 cycles of compression.

RESULTS

The mean gap measured at the tear site without treatment was 6.46 mm (± 1.41 mm) for radial tears and 1.92 mm (± 0.65 mm) for bucket-handle tears. After treatment and 500 cycles of compression, the mean gap was 1.63 mm (± 1.41 mm) for pristine sutures, 1.50 mm (± 1.16 mm) for adhesive sutures and 2.06 mm (± 1.53 mm) for adhesive gel patches. There was no significant difference between treatments regardless of the type of tear. Also, the gaps for radial tears increased significantly with the number of compression cycles applied (p > 0.001).

CONCLUSION

From a biomechanical standpoint, the tough adhesive gel patch is as effective as suturing. In addition, it would allow the repair of non-suturable tears and thus broaden the indications for meniscus repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Controlled laboratory study.

Effectiveness of a digital rehabilitation program based on computer vision and augmented reality for isolated meniscus injury: protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The lack of access to physical therapists in developing countries and rural areas poses a significant challenge in supervising postsurgical rehabilitation, potentially impeding desirable outcomes following surgical interventions. For this reason, this study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of utilizing a digital rehabilitation program based on computer vision and augmented reality in comparison with traditional care for patients who will undergo isolated meniscus repair, since to date, there is no literature on this topic.

METHODS

This study intends to enroll two groups of participants, each to be provided with informed consent before undergoing randomization into either the experimental or control group. The experimental group will undergo a digital rehabilitation program utilizing computer vision and augmented reality (AR) technology following their surgical procedure, while the control group will receive conventional care, involving in-clinic physical therapy sessions weekly. Both groups will adhere to a standardized rehabilitation protocol over a six-month duration. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at various intervals, including preoperatively, and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Imaging assessments and return-to-play evaluations will be conducted during the final follow-up. Clinical functionality will be assessed based on improvements in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2300070582.

Rehabilitation protocol after suturing the medial meniscus of a stable knee, a retrospective series of the Francophone Arthroscopy Society

INTRODUCTION

Surgical meniscal lesions are common and 80% of cases involve the medial meniscus of a stable knee. There is a lack of consensus regarding postoperative rehabilitation protocols and a wide variation between restrictive and accelerated rehabilitation protocols exists. The main objective of this study was to report the functional results and the failure rate of the various rehabilitation protocols of the retrospective series of the French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA) after suturing the medial meniscus of a stable knee, considering whether the tear is stable or unstable.

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that accelerated rehabilitation was not associated with an increased risk of failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study was conducted across 10 centers (6 private hospitals and 4 public hospitals) including all patients tested for a medial meniscus suture in a stable knee between January 1, 2005 and November 31, 2017 for a minimum follow-up of 5years. Demographic, imaging, suturing, rehabilitation protocol, and functional TEGNER and KOOS scores were collected. Failure was defined as performing a secondary meniscectomy.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-seven patients were analyzed with an average follow-up of 82months. Immediate weight bearing was allowed in 85% of cases, the wearing of a brace was present in almost 74% of cases and flexion was limited in 97% of cases. Inter-group comparisons found a higher suture failure rate in the group with immediate weight bearing (35.6% vs. 20%, p=0.011) and in the group with a brace (36.9% vs. 22.4%, p<0.001). There was no difference in the 90° flexion group. The TEGNER score was higher in the non-weight bearing group (6.5 vs. 5.4, p=0.028) and the KOOS QOL score was higher in the group without a brace (82.2 vs. 66.8, p=0.025). According to a multivariate analysis, immediate weight bearing (OR=3.6, [1.62; 7.98], p=0.0016) and wearing a brace (OR=2.83, [1.54; 5.02], p<0.001) were associated with a higher failure rate. In the group of stable lesions, the use of a brace (OR=3.73, [1.62; 8.56], p=0.0019) was associated with a higher failure rate.

CONCLUSION

No consensus regarding rehabilitation protocols has been established to date and the results of this retrospective series of the SFA affirm the great variability of practices at a national level. Although accelerated rehabilitation protocols are presently favored, the resumption of immediate full weight bearing should be considered with caution, being associated with a higher risk of failure in this series. Deferring weight bearing for 1 month can be considered in the event of a large tear or in the event of damage to the circumferential fibers. Wearing a brace does not seem to have any influence, while limited flexion achieved a consensus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Return-to-sport criteria after isolated meniscus suture: Scoping review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Follow-up care including rehabilitation therapy after isolated meniscal repair remains to be standardized. Thus, no standard criteria are available for the return-to-running (RTR) or return-to-sport (RTS). The objective of this study was to identify criteria for RTR and RTS after isolated meniscal repair, based on a review of the literature.

HYPOTHESIS

Return-to-sport criteria after isolated meniscal repair have been published.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review of the literature using the methodology developed by Arksey and O'Malley. The terms "menisc*" and "repair" and "return-to-sport" or "return to play" or "return to run" or "rehabilitation" were used to search the PubMed database on 1st March 2021. All relevant studies were included. All RTR and RTS criteria were identified, analyzed, and classified.

RESULTS

We included 20 studies. Mean RTR and RTS times were 12.9 and 20 weeks, respectively. Clinical, strength, and performance criteria were identified. The clinical criteria included full range-of-motion recovery with no pain, quadriceps wasting, or joint effusion. Strength criteria were a quadriceps and hamstring deficit, no greater than 30% and 15% for RTR and RTS, respectively, compared to the normal side. Performance criteria were successful completion of proprioception, balance, and neuromuscular tests. RTS rates ranged from 80.4% to 100%.

CONCLUSION

Patients must meet clinical, strength, and performance criteria before resuming running and sports. The level of evidence is low, due to the heterogeneity and generally arbitrary choice of criteria. Further large-scale studies are therefore needed to validate and standardize RTR and RTS criteria.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Impact of Meniscal Tear Type and Surgical Treatment on Quadriceps Strength: A Study of Adolescent Patients Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Treatment of meniscal injuries at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can result in restrictions on weightbearing and range of motion in the early rehabilitative phases. What is unknown is the effect of (1) meniscal tear type and location at the time of anterior cruciate ligament injury and (2) meniscal treatment at the time of ACLR on quadriceps strength in adolescents during the late rehabilitative phase.

HYPOTHESIS

Meniscal tears involving the root and requiring repair would adversely affect quadriceps strength at 6 to 9 months postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACLR at 1 of 2 research sites between 2013 and 2021 were identified. Adolescent participants were included if they were between the ages of 12 and 20 years at the time of assessment and had undergone primary unilateral ACLR in the previous 6 to 9 months. Participants were subgrouped by meniscal tear type (no tear, nonroot tear, root tear) and meniscal treatment at the time of ACLR (no treatment, meniscectomy, meniscal repair), which were confirmed via chart review. Isokinetic strength testing occurred at 60 deg/s, and quadriceps strength and quadriceps strength limb symmetry index were compared between the meniscal tear type and meniscal procedure subgroups using analysis of covariance while controlling for the effects of age, sex, and ACLR graft source.

RESULTS

An overall 236 patients were included in this analysis (109 male, 127 female; mean ± SD age, 16.0 ± 1.9 years). There were no significant differences in ACLR limb quadriceps strength based on meniscal tear type (P = .61) or meniscal procedure at the time of ACLR (P = .61), after controlling for age, biological sex, and ACLR graft source. Similarly, quadriceps strength limb symmetry index did not differ by meniscal tear type (P = .38) or meniscal procedure at the time of ACLR (P = .40).

CONCLUSION

Meniscal tear type and treatment at the time of ACLR did not affect quadriceps strength or quadriceps strength symmetry in adolescents 6 to 9 months after ACLR.

Does Accelerated Rehabilitation Provide Better Outcomes Than Restricted Rehabilitation in Postarthroscopic Repair of Meniscal Injury?

CONTEXT

Meniscal injury is a common pathology, and the postoperative rehabilitation program is essential to patients after surgery. However, the optimal rehabilitation plan after meniscus suture is still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes between accelerated rehabilitation and restricted programs in patients with meniscus suture (with or without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, ACLR).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Four databases, including PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were searched up to November 2021. This study only included studies comparing the clinical outcomes between accelerated (immediate range of motion and weight-bearing) and restricted rehabilitation (immobilization and progressive weight-bearing) for meniscus suture. All selected studies were divided into 2 subgroups: isolated meniscus suture or combined with ACLR. The Lysholm score, Tegner score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were evaluated in simple meniscus sutures no less than 1 year. Failure rate was evaluated in both groups, and the tunnel enlargement was additionally evaluated in patients who underwent ACLR.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eleven studies with 612 patients were eligible for analysis. The accelerated group included 4 studies with 330 participants, while the restricted group included 7 studies with 282 participants. For the patients after isolated meniscus suture, the accelerated group achieved higher Lysholm scores (mean difference = -4.66; 95% confidence interval, -8.6 to -0.73; P = .02; I2 = 88%) than the restricted group. For the patients after meniscus suture with ACLR, patients undergoing accelerated rehabilitation were associated with a significantly larger tibial tunnel enlargement in the anterior-posterior view (mean difference = -7.08; 95% confidence interval, -10.92 to -3.24; P = .0003; I2 = 0%) and lateral view (mean difference = -10.33; 95% confidence interval, -16.9 to -3.75; P = .002; I2 = 17%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of postoperative rehabilitation in either accelerated or restricted programs in patients with meniscus lesions after repair. A significant higher mean self-reported function was discovered at final follow-ups in the accelerated group. However, a significant increase in tibial tunnel enlargement was also found in accelerated group.

Clinical outcomes of a standardized rehabilitation protocol for meniscal repair: A retrospective case series

Background/Purpose: To examine clinical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent meniscal repair with a modified accelerated rehabilitation program. Methods: This study represents a case series of patients who underwent meniscal repair from 2017 to 2019. The mean patient age was 26.6 (range: 15–47) years. Of the 28 total patients, 22 had concomitant anterior cruciate ligament tears that were treated with single-bundle hamstring reconstruction at the time of meniscal repair. All patients were enrolled in a standardized rehabilitation program, allowing early-phase protected weight-bearing and knee mobilization. Patient-reported symptoms, the McMurray test, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) were used to evaluate outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 13 ± 3.1 (range: 9–20) months. Results: Of the participating patients, 75% (22 of 28) returned to their original sports activities. Most patients displayed satisfactory clinical outcomes with significant improvements in IKDC scores. No re-tears were detected. Conclusion: Early protected weight-bearing with progressive early knee mobilization is a safe rehabilitation option after meniscal repair.

Perioperative Thromboprophylaxis Is Associated With Lower Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Knee Arthroscopy

PURPOSE

To determine the rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients undergoing arthroscopic knee procedures, risk factors associated with postoperative VTE, and current perioperative thromboprophylaxis prescription patterns associated with this population in the United States.

METHODS

Medical records for patients ≥18 years of age were queried from the Mariner database using Current Procedural Terminology codes for knee arthroscopy performed in the United States from 2010 to 2020 in this cross-sectional study. Patients who received thromboprophylaxis and those diagnosed with VTE, including deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, within 90 days of surgery were identified using International Classification of Diseases and National Drug Codes. Two multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify VTE risk factors and likelihood of perioperative thromboprophylaxis. Covariates included procedure type, age, oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use, and medical comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 718,289 patients met inclusion criteria and 7,618 patients (1.06%) experienced VTE, including deep-vein thrombosis (n = 6,394, 0.9%) and/or pulmonary embolism (n = 2,211, 0.3%). A total of 10,769 patients (1.5%) filled perioperative thromboprophylaxis, including aspirin (n = 5,353, 0.7%), low-molecular-weight heparin (n = 4,563, 0.6%), and oral factor Xa inhibitors (n = 947, 0.1%). Perioperative thromboprophylaxis was associated with decreased odds of experiencing VTE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.80). Procedure types categorized as moderate-to-greater risk were associated with increased odds of VTE (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.34-1.50). OCP use (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.38-1.91), obesity (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.24), renal disease (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.50) and congestive heart failure (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.50) were associated with increased odds of VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

While the overall rate of symptomatic VTE following knee arthroscopy remains low, procedure types that are more complex and generally require restrictive rehabilitation protocols, OCP use, obesity, renal disease, and congestive heart failure are associated with increased odds of postoperative VTE. Conversely, the use of perioperative thromboprophylaxis is associated with significantly lower VTE risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Rehabilitation and return to sports after isolated meniscal repairs: a new evidence-based protocol

PURPOSE

Despite many protocols that have been proposed, there's no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal rehabilitation program and return to sports (RTS) protocol following isolated meniscal repair. The aim of this current concept review is to look at the evidence of rehabilitation and RTS program after isolated meniscal repair, focusing on general and specific protocols per type of injury trying to give some guidelines based on the current state of knowledge.

METHODS

A narrative literature review was performed searching PubMed database to identify relevant articles from January 1985 to October 2021 on rehabilitation and RTS after isolated meniscal repair. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cadaveric studies and basic science studies were included.

RESULTS

When the hoop tensile stress effect is preserved, an accelerated rehabilitation program may be suggested. Hence, partial weight bearing (20 kg) in association with ROM limited to 90° is allowed for the first four weeks, followed by weight bearing as tolerated. In contrast, when circumferential hoop fibers are disrupted, a restricted rehabilitation protocol may be recommended. In this scenario no weight bearing is allowed for the first six weeks after the surgery and range of motion (ROM) is limited to 90°.

CONCLUSION

Biomechanical evidence suggests that tailoring an individualized protocol based upon the type of lesion and meniscus stability is reasonable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Standardized Rehabilitation or Individual Approach?—A Retrospective Analysis of Early Rehabilitation Protocols after Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

(1) Background: Isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears represent a severe type of injury. In hospitals, PCL reconstruction (PCL-R) is less frequently performed than other types of knee surgery. It is unclear whether there is consensus among surgeons on how to perform rehabilitation after PCL-R or if there are different, more individual approaches in daily routines. (2) Methods: Rehabilitation protocols and their main criteria (the progression of weight bearing and range of motion, the use of knee braces, rehabilitation training, and sports-specific training) were retrospectively analyzed after PCL-R. (3) Results: Only 33 of 120 (27.5%) analyzed institutes use rehabilitation protocols after PCL-R. The applied protocols showed vast differences between the individual rehabilitation criteria, especially with regard to the progression of weight bearing and the range of motion. The only standardized recommendations were the obligatory use of knee braces and the general restriction of weight bearing and range of motion immediately post-surgery. Therefore, because of the lack of a consensus about a standardized rehabilitation protocol after PCL-R, no recommendation can be made on one particular protocol. (4) Conclusion: There is no acknowledged standardized rehabilitation protocol after PCL-R. In clinical practice, recommendations are influenced by, i.a., surgeons’ opinions and experience. The lack of scientific evidence on a particular standardized rehabilitation protocol after PCL-R suggests that rehabilitation protocols need to be tailored to the individual patient.

Meniscal Repair Outcomes at Greater Than 5 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The utilization of meniscal repair techniques continues to evolve in an effort to maximize the rate of healing. Meniscal repair outcomes at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively appear to better represent the true failure rates. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature was conducted to assess the rate of failure at a minimum of 5 years after meniscal repair.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of studies reporting the outcomes of meniscal repair at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. A standardized search and review strategy was utilized. Failure was defined as recurrent clinical symptoms or a meniscal reintervention to repair or resect the meniscus in any capacity, as defined by the study. When reported, outcomes were assessed relative to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) status, sex, age, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Meta-analyses were performed with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies of 1,612 patients and 1,630 meniscal repairs were included in this review and meta-analysis. The pooled overall failure rate was 22.6%, while the failure rate of modern repairs (excluding early-generation all-inside devices) was 19.5%. Medial repairs were significantly more likely to fail compared with lateral repairs (23.9% versus 12.6%, p = 0.04). Failure rates were similar for inside-out (14.2%) and modern all-inside repairs (15.8%). Early-generation all-inside devices had a significantly higher failure rate (30.2%) compared with modern all-inside devices (15.8%, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in meniscal failure rate between repairs with concomitant ACL reconstruction (21.2%) and repairs in ACL-intact knees (23.3%, p = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Modern meniscal repair had an overall failure rate of 19.5% at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Modern all-inside techniques appear to have improved the success rate of meniscal repair compared with use of early-generation all-inside devices. Lateral repairs were significantly more likely to be successful compared with medial repairs, while no difference was seen between patients undergoing meniscal repair with and without concomitant ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Meniscus Repair Part 2: Technical Aspects, Biologic Augmentation, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes

Multiple meniscal repair techniques exist, and successful healing and excellent patient outcomes have been reported with a variety of all-inside and open techniques. Increased awareness and recognition of root tears and meniscocapsular separations are topics of recent interest. The ideal treatment of these injuries remains uncertain, and definitive recommendations regarding their treatment are lacking. Postoperative protocols regarding weight bearing and range of motion are controversial and require future study. The role of biologics in the augmentation of meniscal repair remains unclear but promising. An evidence-based individualized approach for meniscal repair focusing on clinical outcomes and value is essential.

Does meniscal repair impact muscle strength following ACL reconstruction?

Purpose: Meniscal lesions are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Meniscal repair, when possible, is widely accepted as the standard of care. Despite advancements in surgical and rehabilitation techniques, meniscal repair may impact muscle recovery when performed in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. The objective of this study was to explore if meniscal repairs in the context of ACL reconstruction affected muscle recovery compared to isolated ACL reconstruction. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with isolated ACL reconstruction were compared to 35 patients with ACL reconstruction with an associated meniscal repair. All ACL reconstructions were performed using hamstring grafts with screw-interference graft fixation. Isokinetic muscle testing was performed between six and eight months of follow-up. Muscle recovery between both groups was compared. A further subgroup analysis was performed to compare muscle recovery function of gender and meniscal tear location. Tegner scores were assessed at six months’ follow-up. Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding muscle recovery. No difference in muscle recovery was found concerning gender. Lesion of both menisci significantly increased the deficit of hamstrings muscular strength at 60°/s compared to a lesion of one meniscus (26.7% ± 15.2 vs. 18.1% ± 13.5, p = 0.018) and in eccentric test (32.4% ± 26.2 vs. 18.1% ± 13.5, p = 0.040). No significant differences were found concerning the Tegner score. Conclusion: Meniscal repairs performed during an ACL reconstruction do not impact muscle recovery at 6–8 months post-operatively compared to an isolated ACL reconstruction. However, reparations of both menisci appear to impact hamstring muscle recovery negatively.

Level of evidence: III, Retrospective cohort study

Treatment, Return to Play, and Performance Following Meniscus Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The standard of care in meniscal tear management is constantly evolving, especially for athletes and high-demand patients. Meniscus repairs, meniscus transplants, and partial meniscectomies are commonly performed, and rehabilitation methods following these operations are becoming more sophisticated. The ultimate goal of these procedures is returning patients to full activity with minimal risks. Return to play should be systematic, pathology dependent, and individualized to an athlete's needs, expectations, and level of play. This article provides a review of the current treatment modalities of meniscus tears, the rehabilitation protocols following each modality, and the return to play criteria that must be met before releasing the player to competition. In addition, it overviews articles that describe performance outcomes of patients that have undergone meniscus surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research shows high return to play rates for athletes that undergo meniscus surgery and describes effective rehabilitation protocols to facilitate recovery. There is an increased emphasis on meniscus preservation in recent literature. In addition, meniscus allograft transplantation has demonstrated its efficacy as a salvage procedure and has become a stronger consideration in the athlete with meniscus pathology. No standardized return to play protocol can be applied uniformly to all kinds of meniscal surgeries, and two athletes with the same pathology cannot be expected to follow identical paths towards full recovery. A multidisciplinary approach to care should be provided to the patients, and in the case of patients with high levels of athleticism, the road to recovery starts even before the injury itself.

Current Standards of Early Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in German Speaking Countries-Differentiation Based on Tendon Graft and Concomitant Injuries

Background: Although anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a well-established procedure and is standardly performed by orthopedic surgeons all over the world, there does not seem to be a standard protocol for early rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to give answers to the following questions: (i) Does (a) the use of a specific tendon graft, and (b) potentially additional therapy of concomitant pathologies influence surgeons’ choice of a distinct postoperative rehabilitation protocol after ACLR? (ii) To what extent do these rehabilitation recommendations differ? Methods: Retrospective analysis of currently used early rehabilitation protocols after ACLR in German-speaking countries (GER, AUT and SUI) was conducted. Rehabilitation criteria included weight bearing, range of motion (ROM), the utilization of braces, continuous passive/active motion therapy (CPM/CAM), rehabilitation training and sport-specific training. Tendon grafts were differentiated as hamstring (HAM) and bone−patellar tendon−bone grafts (BTB). Concomitant pathologies included meniscus injuries (+M) and unhappy triad injuries (+UTI). Results: Most of the surveyed protocols were differentiated according to the used tendon graft or additional therapy of concomitant injuries (ACLR-differentiated, n = 147 vs. ACLR without graft differentiation, n = 58). When comparing ACLR-HAM and ACLR-BTB, significant differences were found regarding weight bearing (p = 0.01), ROM (p = 0.05) and the utilization of braces (p = 0.03). Regarding ACLR+M, an overall significant decelerated rehabilitation could be detected. After ACLR+UTI-therapy, a significant delayed start to full weight bearing (p = 0.002) and ROM (p < 0.001) was found. Conclusions: Most orthopedic surgeons from German-speaking countries differentiate early rehabilitation after ACLR according to the tendon graft used and therapy of concomitant pathologies. No consensus about early rehabilitation after ACLR is available. However, tendencies for an accelerated rehabilitation after ACLR-BTB and a more restrained rehabilitation of multiple injured knees were detected.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation does not result in more favourable outcomes in arthroscopic meniscal repair: a meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation for arthroscopic meniscal repair is controversial. This meta-analysis compared arthroscopic meniscal repair performed in isolation or augmented with PRP.

Methods

The present study was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Embase were accessed in August 2021. All the clinical trials which compared arthroscopic meniscal repair performed in isolation or augmented with PRP were included.

Results

Eight hundred thirty-seven patients were included: 38% (318 of 837 patients) were women; the mean age of the patients was 35.6 (range, 20.8–64.3) years; the mean follow-up was 26.2 (range, 6–54) months. Similarity was found in analogue scale (VAS) (P = 0.5) and Lysholm (P = 0.9), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (P = 0.9). Similarity was found in the rate of failure (P = 0.4) and rate of revision (P = 0.07).

Conclusion

The current published scientific evidence does not support PRP augmentation for arthroscopic meniscal repair.

The modifying factors that help improve anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

The goal of a rehabilitation programme after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to manage a patient's goals and expectations (i.e., returning to physical activities and sports) while minimizing the risk of new injury, particularly a new ACL injury. Although general rehabilitation programmes have been proposed, some factors can lead to adapting each programme to each patient.

OBJECTIVE

To describe how different variables, including surgical techniques, sports participation, psycho-social and contextual factors can modify the rehabilitation programme.

METHODS

We performed a narrative review with input from experts in the field (level of evidence 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Modifying factors of the ACL rehabilitation programme are related to the initial lesion or surgery, to sports, or to psychological or social aspects. Regarding the type of graft, the rehabilitation is mainly different in the early postoperative phase; the other phases are not graft-based but rather goal-based rehabilitation. Depending on the meniscal or cartilage repair, the rehabilitation protocol will initially take priority over the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protocol. The ACL reconstruction rehabilitation programme should meet the requirements of the anticipated sports, to optimize the athlete's ability to return to the expected level and minimize the risk of reinjury. Psycho-social and contextual factors must also be considered in rehabilitation care to individualize and optimize each patient's programme.

Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation of Healing Rates After Arthroscopic Repair of Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

Evaluation of meniscal healing status after repair is important, as it allows the surgeon to inform patients whether they can increase their activities or return to sports.

Purpose:

To identify the healing rates after arthroscopic repair of meniscal tears via second-look arthroscopic evaluation.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases were conducted to identify relevant studies published before June 1, 2020. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they provided data regarding healing status of the meniscus at second-look arthroscopy. Random-effects meta-analyses were generated to provide pooled meniscal healing estimates. We further performed subgroup analysis to investigate the healing rates of the meniscus under different situations.

Results:

A total of 41 studies with 1908 individuals were included in the study. The pooled analysis showed the complete healing rate was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-80%), the partial healing rate was 10% (95% CI, 6%-16%), and the failure rate was 12% (95% CI, 10%-15%) for arthroscopic repair of meniscal tears via second-look arthroscopic evaluation. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that no individual study affected the overall healing rate by >1%. Subgroup analysis found higher meniscal healing rates in patients with the following characteristics: age <40 years, male, body mass index <26, red-red tear location, tear in posterior horn, vertical tear, outside-in technique, repair concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, weight-restricted rehabilitation, and time interval from meniscal repair to second-look arthroscopy >12 months.

Conclusion:

In this systematic review, the complete healing rate was 74%, the partial healing rate was 10%, and the failure rate was 12% for arthroscopic repair of meniscal tears via second-look arthroscopic evaluation.

Effect of Meniscal Treatment on Functional Outcomes 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

Meniscal injuries are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Treatment of meniscal injuries can impart delayed weightbearing and range of motion restrictions, which can affect the rehabilitation protocol. The effect of meniscal treatment and subsequent restrictions on strength recovery after ACL reconstruction is unclear.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare strength, jumping performance, and patient-reported outcomes between patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and those who underwent surgical intervention for meniscal pathology at the time of ACLR. Our hypothesis was that patients who underwent concurrent meniscal repair (MR) would have lower strength recovery owing to postoperative restrictions.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Patients with ACLR were stratified into isolated ACLR, ACLR and meniscectomy (ACLR-MS), or ACLR-MR groups and were compared with healthy controls. The ACLR-MR group was restricted to partial weightbearing and to 90° of knee flexion for the first 6 weeks postoperatively. All participants completed patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) and underwent bilateral isokinetic and isometric strength tests of the knee extensor and flexor groups as part of a return-to-sports test battery at 5 to 7 months postoperatively.

Results

A total of 165 patients with ACLR (50 with isolated ACLR, 44 with ACLR-MS, and 71 with ACLR-MR) and 140 healthy controls were included in the study. Follow-up occurred at a mean of 5.96 ± 0.47 months postoperatively. The control group demonstrated higher subjective knee function, unilateral peak extensor torque, and limb symmetry than did the ACLR-MS and ACLR-MR groups combined (P < .001 for all). There were no differences in IKDC, KOOS subscales, or unilateral or limb symmetry measures of peak knee extensor or flexor torque among the isolated ACLR, ACLR-MS, and ACLR-MR groups.

Conclusion

Persistent weakness, asymmetry, and reduced subjective outcome scores at 6-month follow-up after ACLR were not influenced by meniscal treatment. These findings suggested that the weightbearing and range of motion restrictions associated with meniscal repair recovery do not result in loss of early strength or worse patient-reported outcomes.

The effect of meniscal pathology and management with ACL reconstruction on patient-reported outcomes, strength, and jump performance ten months post-surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in patient-reported outcome measures, isokinetic strength, plyometric ability and ability to meet return to play criteria ten months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery between those who underwent meniscectomy, those who underwent meniscal repair and those with no meniscal intervention alongside ACL reconstruction surgery.

METHODS

Three hundred and thirteen athletes with clinically and radiologically confirmed ACL ruptures were included in this study. Participants were grouped according to their intra-operative procedures (isolated ACL reconstruction surgery n = 155, ACL reconstruction surgery with meniscectomy n = 128, ACL reconstruction surgery with meniscal repair n = 30). Participants completed patient-reported outcome measures questionnaires (Marx Activity Rating Scale, the ACL Return to Sport after Injury and the International Knee Documentation Committee Score) and completed a battery of objective functional testing including isokinetic dynamometry and jump performance testing (countermovement jump and drop jump) between 9 and 11 months after surgery.

RESULTS

No significant between-group differences were identified in any metric relating to patient-reported outcome measures (p = .611), strength and jump measures (p = .411) or the ability to achieve symmetry-based return to play criteria (p = .575).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically, these results suggest that concomitant meniscal surgery has no significant effects on patient-reported outcome measures, strength and jump metrics at the return to play stage post-operatively and can inform the pre-operative counselling of those awaiting ACL reconstruction surgery with likely meniscal intervention.

Clinical presentation, MRI and clinical outcome scores do not accurately predict an important meniscal tear in a symptomatic discoid meniscus

PURPOSE

Discoid menisci can be symptomatic from instability or a tear. A torn discoid meniscus is likely to require repair to preserve meniscal function and should not be missed. This is the first study to evaluate a range of pre-operative methods to predict the likelihood of a torn discoid meniscus.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Clinical, radiographic and operative data were reviewed. Patients were grouped based on the presence of a tear or not during surgery. All patients underwent MRI scans pre-operatively which were validated with arthroscopy findings to calculate sensitivity. All patients completed Pedi-KOOS and Pedi-IKDC pre-operative scores.

RESULTS

There were 32 discoid menisci in 27 patients. Mean age at surgery was 10.4 years (6-16). Nineteen patients were female. Seventeen menisci were identified as torn at time of arthroscopy (53%), 15 were unstable but not torn. Clinical findings did not differentiate between the torn or unstable menisci. MRI was only 75% sensitive and 50% specific at identifying a torn discoid meniscus. There was no statistical difference between KOOS-child (n.s.) and Pedi-IKDC (n.s.) scores between the groups.

CONCLUSION

MRI is neither sensitive nor specific at identifying tears in discoid menisci. There is no difference in pre-operative outcome scores for patients with a torn or unstable discoid meniscus; pre-operative PROMs are a poor predictor of a meniscal tear. This study emphasises that pre-operative tests and clinical findings are not conclusive for identifying a meniscal tear and the operating surgeon should be vigilant in identifying and repairing tears at the time of surgery. Pre-operative findings poorly correlate to arthroscopic findings and potential surgical interventions required. Patients and parents/carers should, therefore, be appropriately counselled prior to surgery that post-operative measures are dependent on intra-operative findings and not pre-operative findings in patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Rehabilitation and Return to Play Following Meniscus Repair

Injuries to the meniscus, particularly tears, can have significant negative impacts on pain, function, and quality of life. Preservation of the meniscus is favorable, especially in the athletic and active populations. While first line treatment is often nonoperative in nature, recalcitrant, and more complex tears, typically require surgery. Meniscus repair rates have increased significantly during the last 2 decades as surgical techniques and postoperative outcomes have improved. Longer postoperative timeframes are to be expected when compared with menisectomy, however, accelerated programs have demonstrated favorable outcomes. Rehabilitation and return to play guidelines should reflect the intricacies of the tear type and repair procedure. Close communication with the surgeon is a vital component to optimize patient outcomes. Further, the patient's goals and expected level of return to function, or sport, must be taken into account for a rehabilitation program to be fully successful.

Risk of arthrofibrosis in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the role of timing and meniscus suture

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. Several studies have shown that early surgery leads to an increased rate of arthrofibrosis and poorer postoperative function. Other studies found no correlation between time of surgery and arthrofibrosis. The influence of simultaneous meniscus treatment is also discussed. Aim of this study was to ascertain whether the timing of surgery and treatment of meniscus influences the occurrence rate of arthrofibrosis.

METHODS

Two hundred and six patients could be included. These were split into two groups. Group 1: surgery within 6 weeks after ACL rupture (n = 68), group 2: surgery after more than 6 weeks (n = 68). In addition, 2 matched groups were created (n = 138 ). Follow-up was 12 months after surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of subsequent arthrofibrosis procedures (arthroscopic arthrolysis). Secondary endpoints were knee function (knee osteoarthritis outcome score: KOOS), knee pain (numeric rating scale: NRS) and patient satisfaction measured on a 5 point Likert scale.

RESULTS

In 6 of the 68 patients in group 1 (8.8%) and 3 of the 138 patients in group 2 (2.2%) a subsequent arthroscopic arthrolysis was performed (OR 4.4). A simultaneous meniscal suture was performed in 58 patients (30 of them in group 1). Five of the six patients with subsequent arthrolysis in group 1 received meniscal repair (OR for arthrolysis 3.4). There was no difference between the groups in terms of knee function (KOOS), pain (NRS) and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The rate of subsequent arthroscopic arthrolysis was higher in the acute surgery group. However, most of these subsequent procedures were associated with meniscal repair at index surgery with a more restrictive rehabilitation protocol than after ACL reconstruction without meniscus repair. This allows the assessment that the meniscal suturing poses an increased risk. Therefore, this allows the conclusion that if using an anatomical surgical technique and considering the signs of inflammation with effusion, pain and movement deficit less than 90° there is no increased risk of arthrofibrosis.

Publicly Available Rehabilitation Protocols Designated for Meniscal Repairs Are Highly Variable

Purpose

To compare publicly available rehabilitation protocols designated for meniscal repairs published online to determine the variability in meniscus repair protocols including different types of tears (radial vs nonradial repairs).

Methods

From the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access System (FREIDA), a list of publicly available academic residency programs and orthopaedic sports medicine fellowships was obtained. With this list, an electronic search using Google was performed looking for meniscal repair rehabilitation protocols. In addition to academic institutions, private practice organizations with published meniscus repair rehabilitation protocols found during the search also were examined.

Results

Of 189 academic institutions, a total of 30 academic institutions had protocols that were included. Another 29 private practice programs were subsequently found and included. In total, 59 rehabilitation protocols fit the inclusion criteria. Six of the 59 specified radial repair and 53 did not. For return to full range of motion, nonradial protocols averaged 6.7 weeks and radial protocols averaged 7.3 weeks. For return to full weight-bearing, nonradial protocols averaged 6.2 weeks and radial protocols averaged 7.5 weeks. For return to sport, nonradial protocols averaged 17.8 weeks and radial protocols averaged 23.3 weeks. For time spent in a brace, nonradial protocols averaged 5.7 weeks and radial protocols averaged 6.7 weeks.

Conclusions

Of publicly available meniscal repair rehabilitation protocols, a small percentage (10.2%) changed their protocol in relation to tear type and there was a wide range of timeframes for each rehabilitation component. Protocols for radial tears tended to brace patients longer, limit their range of motion longer, delay full weight-bearing, and delay return to sport. However, it is recognized that some surgeons could be modifying their protocols in relation to tear type without publishing that information online.

Clinical Relevance

As stated in the purpose, the point of this study was to access only the protocols that would be available to the public. If anything, awareness should be raised for surgeons to look at their existing protocols and update them if they are truly incomplete and outdated. More research needs to be done to structure a rehabilitation protocol that is specific to the meniscal tear type, as the current protocols have a wide range of variance.

An Up-to-Date Review of the Meniscus Literature: A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Background:

A large number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding the meniscus have been published.

Purpose:

To provide a qualitative summary of the published systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding the meniscus.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A systematic search of all meta-analyses and systematic reviews regarding the meniscus and published between July 2009 and July 2019 was performed with PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database. Published abstracts, narrative reviews, articles not written in English, commentaries, study protocols, and topics that were not focused on the meniscus were excluded. The most pertinent results were extracted and summarized from each study.

Results:

A total of 332 articles were found, of which 142 were included. Included articles were summarized and divided into 16 topics: epidemiology, diagnosis, histology, biomechanics, comorbid pathology, animal models, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), meniscal repair, meniscal root repairs, meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), meniscal implants and scaffolds, mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors, postoperative rehabilitation, postoperative imaging assessment, patient-reported outcome measures, and cost-effectiveness. The majority of articles focused on APM (20%), MAT (18%), and meniscal repair (17%).

Conclusion:

This summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses delivers surgeons a single source of the current evidence regarding the meniscus.

Investigation of extrusion of the medial meniscus under full weight-loading conditions using upright weight-loading magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

Meniscal morphology under full weight-loading conditions is currently unknown. This study aimed to evaluate extrusion in the medial meniscus between unloaded and upright-loaded conditions in healthy adults using upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography and to investigate the relationship between MRI and ultrasonography in upright-loaded conditions.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy adult volunteers (13 men and 5 women) participated in the study. MRI and ultrasonography were performed with patients in the supine, double-leg upright (DLU), and single-leg upright (SLU) positions. Medial, anterior, and posterior extrusions of the medial meniscus against the tibial edge were evaluated and compared across the three positions. Medial extrusion correlations between MRI and ultrasonography were examined. Demographic data and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles were measured and correlated with changes in the medial extrusion. The medial meniscal extrusions detected via MRI and ultrasonography were compared across the three positions. Correlations were examined using Pearson's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Negative correlations were found between the change in medial extrusion of the medial meniscus and HKA angle (MRI: r = -0.52, ultrasonography: r = -0.51). Although no significant differences among the three conditions were observed for the anterior and posterior extrusions of the medial meniscus, the medial extrusion of the medial meniscus was significantly greater in DLU and SLU positions than that in the supine position for MRI and ultrasonography (P < 0.05). Positive correlations for the medial extrusion of the medial meniscus were found between MRI and ultrasonography in all three positions (supine: r = 0.74, DLU; r = 0.71, SLU; r = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Although no significant differences in anterior and posterior extrusions of the medial meniscus were seen across the studied positions, the medial meniscus was found to undergo significant medial extrusion during upright weight-loading conditions. The strong correlation between MRI and ultrasonography highlighted the usefulness of ultrasonography.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Early Functional Rehabilitation after Meniscus Surgery: Are Currently Used Orthopedic Rehabilitation Standards Up to Date?

Meniscus therapy is a challenging process. Besides the respective surgical procedure such as partial meniscectomy, meniscus repair, or meniscus replacement, early postoperative rehabilitation is important for meniscus regeneration and return to sport and work as well as long-term outcome. Various recommendations are available. However, the current literature lacks information concerning the actual early rehabilitation in daily routine recommended by orthopedic surgeons. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate currently used standard early rehabilitation protocols in the daily routine of orthopedic surgeons. This study investigated the recommendations and concepts for early rehabilitation after meniscus therapy given by German, Austrian, and Swiss orthopedic institutions. Standardized criteria such as weight bearing, range of motion, use of an orthosis, and rehabilitation training were analyzed according to the conducted surgical procedure: partial meniscectomy, meniscus repair, or meniscus replacement. The analysis of standard rehabilitation concepts for partial meniscectomy (n = 15), meniscus repair (n = 54), and meniscus replacement (n = 7) showed significantly earlier functional rehabilitation in all criteria after partial meniscectomy in contrast to meniscus repair techniques (p < 0.001). In addition, significant restrictions were found in full weight bearing, full range of motion, and the use of braces. In summary, a wide range of recommendations for weight bearing, ROM, brace therapy, and mobilization is available, particularly after meniscus repair and meniscus replacement. Most concepts are in accordance with those described in the current literature. Further research is necessary to enhance the scientific evidence on currently used early rehabilitation concepts after meniscus therapy.

The effect of meniscal repair on strength deficits 6 months after ACL reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be accompanied by meniscal lesions. Generally, the rehabilitation protocols are altered by meniscal repair. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of meniscal repair on the early recovery of thigh muscle strength in ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a matched cohort analysis of n = 122 isolated ACLR (CON) compared to n = 61 ACLR with meniscal repair (ACLR + MR). The subgroups of meniscal repair consisted of 30 patients who had undergone medial meniscus repairs (MM), 19 lateral meniscus repairs (LM) and 12 repairs of medial and lateral meniscus (BM). Isokinetic strength measurement was performed pre-operatively and 6 months post-surgery to perform a cross-sectional and a longitudinal analysis. All injuries were unilateral, and the outcome measures were compared to the non-affected contralateral leg.

RESULTS

Six months postoperatively overall there is no significant difference between the groups (extension strength MR 82% vs. CON 85% and flexion strength 86% vs. 88%, resp.). Subgroup analysis showed that medial repairs exhibit a comparable leg symmetry while lateral repairs performed worse with leg symmetry being 76% in extension and 81% in flexion strength. Patients undergoing BM repair performed in between lateral and medial repairs (82% extension, 86% flexion).

CONCLUSION

Generally, meniscal repair in conjunction with ACLR does not significantly alter the recovery of limb symmetry in strength at 6 months postoperatively. Interestingly, medial repairs seem to perform superior to lateral meniscal repair and repair of both menisci. Since the recovery of symmetric strength is a major factor in rehabilitation testing, these results will help to advise surgeons on appropriate rehabilitation protocols and setting realistic goals for the injured athlete.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Influence of severe knee pain, meniscus surgery and knee arthroplasty on physical ability: an observational study of 114 949 adults in the CONSTANCES cohort

BACKGROUND

The knee is one of the major sites of musculoskeletal pain, yet few large-scale studies have evaluated the impact of knee disorders on physical limitations. Our objective was to describe this impact in a large-scale population study.

METHODS

We included subjects of working age from the CONSTANCES cohort, from its inception. Four groups were distinguished according to their medical history: whether they had knee arthroplasty (KA), meniscus surgery, severe knee pain, or none of these. Outcomes assessed for physical limitations were self-reported limitations in the last 6 months due to health problems, limitation on carrying 5 kg on 10 m and a 3-metre length rapid gait speed test (for participants aged >45). Associations between knee groups and patients' characteristics and physical limitations were analysed using logistic regression. Robust associations were deemed relevant if their ORs were higher than 2 and their p value lower than 0.0001.

RESULTS

Of the 114 949 individuals, 99 052 (86.2%) were in the 'no pain and no surgery' group, 14 740 (12.8%) were in the severe knee pain group, 1019 (0.89%) had meniscus surgery and 138 (0.12%) had KA. Severe knee pain and KA groups showed a similar profile (they were less at work, reported more deterioration in their health and had more limitations).

CONCLUSION

Almost 14% of the sample had knee disorders. Subjects reporting severe knee pain or who had KA reported more important physical limitations then subjects who reported neither severe knee pain nor knee surgery.

Trends in Concomitant Meniscal Surgery Among Pediatric Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction: An Analysis of ABOS Part II Candidates From 2000 to 2016

Background

Rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction among pediatric and adolescent patients are increasing. Limited knowledge exists about population-level rates of concomitant meniscal surgery in this age group.

Purpose/Hypothesis

This study sought to examine trends in concomitant meniscal procedures and describe short-term complications in pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized that overall meniscal surgery rates are increasing and that the likelihood of performing meniscal repair or meniscectomy is associated with patient- and surgeon-specific factors.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

We queried ACL procedures in patients younger than 19 years reported by American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) part II examination candidates from 2000 to 2016. Regression models examined associations between patient and surgeon characteristics, year of surgery, follow-up time, meniscal procedure type, and number and type of complications.

Results

A total of 9766 cases were identified. Females represented 46% (n = 4468) of included cases. Mean patient age was 16.1 years (SD, 1.62 years; range, 0-18 years). The rate of concomitant ACL-meniscal procedures increased from the years 2000 to 2016 (49%-60%; P = .005). Surgeons with sports medicine (+7.0%) or pediatric orthopaedic fellowship (+6.6%) training had a higher likelihood of reporting a concomitant ACL-meniscal procedure (P = .003 and .006, respectively). Sports medicine-trained surgeons were more likely to perform meniscal repair compared with meniscectomy (+3.0%; P = .016). Younger patient age was associated with increased likelihood of undergoing meniscal repair compared with meniscectomy. Overall reported complication rate was 12.8%. Notable reported complications included infection (1.61%), arthrofibrosis (1.14%), and deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (0.11%). Sports medicine and pediatric orthopaedic fellowship training was associated with higher rates of reporting postoperative stiffness and/or arthrofibrosis.

Conclusion

Among ABOS part II candidates, concomitant ACL-meniscal surgery has become more common than isolated ACL procedures. Procedures involving sports medicine fellowship-trained surgeons and younger patients were associated with increased rates of meniscal repair compared with meniscectomy. Pediatric orthopaedic and sports medicine training was associated with a greater likelihood of being involved in a concomitant ACL-meniscal procedure of any kind, and surgeons with such training also reported a higher incidence of postoperative stiffness and/or arthrofibrosis in patients.

High short-term return to sports rate despite an ongoing healing process after acute meniscus repair in young athletes

PURPOSE

Acute meniscus repair in young athletes is always a challenge due to the long rehabilitation process and time to return to sport (RTS). The purpose was to investigate signal alterations in short-term follow-up after acute meniscus repair on specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan sequences. It was hypothesized that (1) MRI signal changes over the first postoperative healing phase and represent a continuous healing process and (2) meniscus healing properties correlates with clinical outcomes and RTS.

METHODS

Young athletes with traumatic meniscus lesion and arthroscopic meniscus repair within 6 weeks and available preoperative MRI were enrolled. Clinical examination, outcome scores (IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm Score, Tegner activity score) and RTS were surveyed preoperatively and 6 and 12 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Radiological follow-up examinations were performed 2, 4, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months after operation using a 3T-MRI. Evaluation was based on ISAKOS meniscus classification system, meniscus healing were classified according to Henning's criteria.

RESULTS

At final follow-up (FU) 30 patients (28 month, 2 week) with a total of 35 meniscus tears (19 medial, 16 lateral) were included. Clinical scores improved significantly after surgery: IKDC Score (preOP: 39.4 ± 18.5, final FU: 78.8 ± 15.3) KOOS (preOP: 45.7 ± 22.1, final FU: 82.7 ± 12.5) and Lysholm Score (preOP: 42.8 ± 23.7, final FU: 84.4 ± 13.8) (p < 0.01). Tegner activity score showed a steadily increase to 4 (range 3-9) at 6 months but did not reached the pre-injury level of 6 (range 3-9). RTS rate was 100% whereof 44.8% reached their pre-injury level. MRI examination revealed a continuous healing process and menisci were classified as 55.9% healed, 35.3% partially healed and 8.8% non-healed at final FU.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that MRI signal alterations of the meniscus steadily occur within the first 6 months postoperatively. MRI reveals an ongoing healing process at final FU that have to be carefully considered when RTS is discussed with high demanding patients. However, young athletes provide good clinical results and RTS rate even though MRI alterations are still present.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, prospective case series, Level IV.

Variability of online available physical therapy protocols from academic orthopedic surgery programs for arthroscopic meniscus repair

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the variability of arthroscopic meniscus repair rehabilitation protocols.

METHODS

Arthroscopic meniscus repair rehabilitation protocols from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited orthopedic surgery programs available online were included for review. Data collection was performed to evaluate recommended weight bearing status and immobilization as well as the presence or absence of recommended therapies, goals for progression of range of motion, functional milestones, and activity initiation time points within each protocol.

RESULTS

Out of 162 institutions available for review, 24 (14.8%) institutions made their protocol available on their website, with 28 total protocols available. Initially following repair, 14 (50%) of the protocols allow for weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT). Of the 14 protocols, which do not allow immediate weightbearing, average time to WBAT was 4.7 ± 1.8 weeks. On average, immobilization was recommended for 6.5 ± 2.1 weeks (range 4-12 weeks). A large majority of protocols gave recommendations for flexion to 90 degrees (24 protocols, range 1-8 weeks), as well as full range of motion (22 protocols, range 6-16 weeks). Active range of motion was recommended to begin at 0-6 weeks (average 3.8 ± 1.9 weeks). Lastly, only 14 protocols (50%) gave an actual return to sport, with an average return recommended at 21.9 ± 3.4 weeks (range 12-24).

CONCLUSION

A minority of ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery programs make their meniscus repair rehabilitation protocols available online. Furthermore, protocols were found to be highly variable. This discrepancy may lead to confusion among therapists and patients.

Delayed Rehabilitation After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Can Reduce Graft Extrusion Compared With Standard Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Meniscal extrusion prevention would be important for restoring normal knee kinematics, even though the effect of graft extrusion after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has not been clearly identified.

HYPOTHESIS

When compared with standard rehabilitation protocols, delayed rehabilitation after lateral MAT could reduce graft extrusion.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients who underwent lateral MAT with the keyhole technique from June 2011 to March 2015 were included. Graft extrusion and lateral compartment articular cartilage loss on magnetic resonance imaging, joint space width (JSW) on weightbearing radiographs, and clinical outcomes (including subjective scores and functional tests) of 25 patients who underwent standard rehabilitation (group S) after lateral MAT were compared with those of 28 patients who underwent delayed rehabilitation (group D), which included immobilization during the first 3 weeks and use of unloading braces for 9 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD follow-up times for groups S and D were 25.7 ± 6.4 and 24.5 ± 7.1 months, respectively. Although the postoperative clinical outcomes did not differ between the groups, graft extrusion (3.2 ± 1.5 mm vs 1.8 ± 1.6 mm) and relative percentage of extrusion (32.2% ± 14.6% vs 17.3% ± 16.6%) were greater in group S than in group D ( P < .001 for both). The percentage of patients with graft extrusion (≥3 mm) was 52% in group S and 21.4% in group D. JSWs on Rosenberg view decreased by 0.1 mm in group S but increased by 0.3 mm in group D ( P = .035). Kellgren-Lawrence grade and modified Outerbridge grade progressed by 44% and 44% among patients in group S and by 17.9% and 21.4% among patients in group D, respectively. There were significant correlations between the coronal graft extrusion and postoperative JSWs on full extension (-0.452) and Rosenberg (-0.410) views, Kellgren-Lawrence grade (0.727), and modified Outerbridge grade (0.732) on magnetic resonance imaging ( P < .001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Compared with standard rehabilitation, delayed rehabilitation showed less coronal graft extrusion and joint space narrowing on weightbearing and reduced the progression of arthrosis, although the rehabilitation protocols showed no differences in clinical outcomes.