3D Computed Tomography Evaluation of Morphological Changes in the Femoral Tunnel After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Graft for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation

Anatomic femoral tunnel position in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: anterior versus posterior

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) between anatomic femoral tunnel positions at anterior and posterior footprints.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients who underwent MPFLR for patellofemoral instability with anterior or posterior femoral tunnels between 2014 and 2021 with at least 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Based on postoperative images, the femoral tunnel positions anterior to the line connecting the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle were assigned to the anterior group, group A, and those posterior to the line to the posterior group, group P. Thirty-two patients were included in group A (mean age, 22.4 ± 8.8 years), and another 25 patients were included in group P (mean age, 21.1 ± 6.1 years). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, Kujala score, and complications were evaluated. Radiologically, the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), patellar tilt angle, and patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scale were evaluated. The patellofemoral cartilage status according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade, bone contusion, femoral tunnel enlargement, and MPFL graft signal intensity were also evaluated.

RESULTS

All clinical scores significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.01). No differences were noted between the two groups in terms of their preoperative demographic data, postoperative clinical scores (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner, and Kujala), complications, or radiological findings (CDI, patellar tilt angle, PFOA, bone contusion, femoral tunnel enlargement, and graft signal intensity). The ICRS grade for the medial facet of the patella progressed in group A (30%, p = 0.02) but not in group P (18%, p = n.s.). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the other compartments of the patellofemoral joint.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes were significantly improved in both groups; however, MPFLR with anterior femoral tunnel position had worse cartilage status on the medial facet of the patella than the posterior femoral tunnel position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Does medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction result in femoral tunnel enlargement? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a common surgical procedure for treating patellar instability. The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine whether MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) leads to femoral tunnel enlargement (FTE). The secondary aims were to explore the clinical effects and risk factors of FTE. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Global Health, Embase), currently registered studies, conference proceedings and the reference lists of included studies were searched independently by three reviewers. There were no constraints based on language or publication status. Study quality assessment was conducted. 3824 records were screened in the initial search. Seven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, evaluating 380 knees in 365 patients. Rates of FTE following MPFLR ranged from 38.7 to 77.1%. Five low quality studies reported FTE did not lead to detrimental clinical outcomes as assessed with the Tegner, Kujala, IKDC, and Lysholm scores. There is conflicting evidence regarding change in femoral tunnel width over time. Three studies (of which two had a high risk of bias) reported age, BMI, presence of trochlear dysplasia and tibial tubercle-tibial groove distance did not differ between patients with and without FTE, suggesting these are not risk factors for FTE.

CONCLUSION

FTE is a common postoperative event following MPFLR. It does not predispose poor clinical outcomes. Current evidence lacks the ability to identify its risk factors. The reliability of any conclusions drawn is hindered by the low level of evidence of the studies included in this review. Larger prospective studies with long-term follow up are required to reliably ascertain the clinical effects of FTE.

After MPFL reconstruction, femoral tunnel widening and migration increase with poor tunnel positioning and are related to poor clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Isolated MPFL reconstruction (iMPFLR) is increasingly used for the surgical treatment of treatment for recurrent patella dislocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of tunnel widening and migration on clinical outcomes after iMPFL using a CT-scannographic analysis at 6 months postoperatively.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty patients (91 females for 69 males) with an average age of 23 years [14-54] who underwent iMPFLR and had an evaluation scan at 6 months postoperatively were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 97 ± 89 months [12 to 166]. Functional International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Kujala score, and joint mobility were assessed preoperatively, at 6 months and at the latest follow-up. The IKDC and Kujala scores were expressed as the difference between pre- and postoperative scores (dIKDC and dKujala). The position of the femoral tunnel was assessed according to the Schöttle criteria on post-operative radiographic profiles. Tunnel widening (at three levels of measurement) and the migration of the center of the tunnel were studied on a CT-scan analysis at 6 months. Any correlation and regression between the evolution of the clinical scores and the measured scannographic parameters were investigated. The relationships between tunnel position and tunnel changes were also studied.

RESULTS

Between pre- and post-op, the IKDC (45 ± 13 to 80 ± 15, p < 0.001) and Kujala (55 ± 11 to 87 ± 12, p < 0.001) scores were significantly improved. Patients with tunnel changes had decreased clinical and functional results at 6 months post-op of an iMPFLR (p < 0.001). These changes in the femoral tunnel, evidenced by a tunnel entrance widening and migration of the tunnel center, were related to an initial malposition of the tunnel (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In iMPFLR, changes in the femoral tunnel, corresponding to dilatation and migration of the tunnel center, may occur. These changes are increased by the initial malpositioning of the femoral tunnel and are correlated with less good clinical and functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Predictors of Graft Failure After Primary Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The tibiofemoral rotation angle has been found to be higher in patients with recurrent patellar dislocations (RPDs) than in healthy people; however, little is known about the clinical significance of this finding.

PURPOSE

To determine whether an increased tibiofemoral rotation angle is associated with graft failure after primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) and to investigate the role of the tibiofemoral rotation angle in predicting MPFL-R failure in patients with RPDs.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 632 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed RPDs from 2011 to 2018. Postoperative stress radiography of the patellofemoral joint was performed to identify whether the graft failed. After a review, 33 patients who showed MPFL-R failure were allocated to the failure group. They were matched 1:2 to 66 participants who underwent successful MPFL-R (control group). The cutoff value and area under the curve (AUC) of the tibiofemoral rotation angle for predicting graft failure after primary MPFL-R were determined, and the risk factors for MPFL-R failure were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The tibiofemoral rotation angle was significantly higher in the failure group than in the control group (16.4° ± 5.6° vs 6.4° ± 4.5°, respectively; P < .001). The cutoff value of the tibiofemoral rotation angle for predicting graft failure was 12.3° (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 89.4%; AUC, 0.920). Overall, 3 risk factors for MPFL-R failure were determined: excessive tibiofemoral rotation (≥12.3°) (odds ratio [OR], 13.159 [95% CI, 2.469-70.139]; P = .003), a preoperative high-grade J-sign (OR, 7.674 [95% CI, 1.232-47.809]; P = .029), and a femoral tunnel malposition (OR, 6.976 [95% CI, 1.077-45.187]; P = .042).

CONCLUSION

In this study, excessive tibiofemoral rotation, a preoperative high-grade J-sign, and a femoral tunnel malposition were identified as risk factors for graft failure after primary MPFL-R in patients with RPDs. More importantly, excessive tibiofemoral rotation ( ≥ 12.3°) may predict the failure of primary MPFL-R, which can help surgeons easily identify high-risk patients of MPFL-R failure before surgery.

Combined MPFL reconstruction and tibial tuberosity transfer avoid focal patella overload in the setting of elevated TT-TG distances

PURPOSE

Objectives are (1) to evaluate the biomechanical effect of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in the setting of increased tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TTTG), in terms of patella contact pressures, contact area and lateral displacement; (2) to describe the threshold of TTTG up to which MPFL reconstruction should be performed alone or in combination with tibial tuberosity transfer.

METHODS

A finite element model of the knee was developed and validated. The model was modified to simulate isolated MPFL reconstruction, tibial tuberosity transfer and MPFL reconstruction combined with tibial tuberosity transfer for patella malalignment. Two TT-TG distances (17 mm and 22 mm) were simulated. Patella contact pressure, contact area and lateral displacement were analysed.

RESULTS

Isolated MPFL reconstruction, at early degrees of flexion, restored normal patella contact pressure when TTTG was 17 mm, but not when TTTG was 22 mm. After 60° of flexion, the TTTG distance was the main factor influencing contact pressure. Isolated MPFL reconstruction for both TTTG 17 mm and 22 mm showed higher contact area and lower lateral displacement than normal throughout knee flexion. Tibial tuberosity transfer, at early degrees of flexion, reduced the contact pressure, but did not restore the normal contact pressure. After 60° of flexion, the TTTG distance was the main factor influencing contact pressure. Tibial tuberosity transfer maintained lower contact area than normal throughout knee flexion. The lateral displacement was higher than normal between 0° and 30° of flexion (< 0.5 mm). MPFL reconstruction combined with tibial tuberosity transfer produced the same contact mechanics and kinematics of the normal condition.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of considering to correct alignment in lateral tracking patella to avoid focal patella overload. Our results showed that isolated MPFL reconstruction corrects patella kinematics regardless of TTTG distance. However, isolated MPFL reconstruction would not restore normal patella contact pressure when TTTG is 22 mm. For TTTG 22 mm, the combined procedure of MPFL reconstruction and tibial tuberosity transfer provided an adequate patellofemoral contact mechanics and kinematics, restoring normal biomechanics. This data supports the use of MPFL reconstruction when the patient has normal alignment and the use of combined MPFL reconstruction and tibial tuberosity transfer in patients with elevated TT-TG distances to avoid focal overload.

Protocols of rehabilitation and return to sport, and clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without tibial tuberosity osteotomy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

No consensus exists on rehabilitation programmes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with or without tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO). This systematic review examined the content and timeline of rehabilitation (weightbearing, range of motion [ROM] and exercise therapy) and return to sport (RTS), as well as patient-reported outcomes after MPFLR with or without TTO.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception to December 2021. Studies that reported postoperative rehabilitation programmes and patient-reported outcomes for patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent MPFLR with or without concomitant TTO were included.

RESULTS

Eighty-five studies were included, 57 of which were case series and only one randomised controlled trial on rehabilitation programmes. Non-weightbearing was set within one week post-operatively in approximately 80% of weightbearing programmes for MPFLR without and with TTO. Joint immobilisation was set within one week post-operatively in 65.3% and 93.8% of programmes for MPFLR without and with TTO, respectively. Weightbearing and ROM (≤ 90°) restriction were within three weeks post-operatively for > 50% of the programmes. Quadriceps strengthening was the most cited exercise therapy (33 programmes), most often initiated within two weeks post-operatively. However, few other exercise programmes were cited (only nine programmes). RTS was mostly noted at six months post-operatively (35 programmes). The weighted mean Kujala score was 87.4 points.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of TTO addition to MPFLR, most studies restricted weightbearing and ROM only in the early post-operative period, with seemingly favourable clinical results. Limited information was available on post-operative exercise therapy.

Application of a true lateral virtual radiograph from 3D-CT to identify the femoral reference point of the medial patellofemoral ligament

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) to describe the femoral reference point of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) on a virtual true lateral radiograph reconstructed from a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) image and (2) to compare this point with that of patients without patellofemoral instability and with Schöttle's point.

METHODS

A total of 26 consecutive patients (29 affected knees) with recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD), who underwent MPFL reconstruction were included in this study (4 males; 22 females; mean age, 24.0 years old). Using a true lateral 3DCT image, the MPFL femoral insertion was identified and marked with a 2-mm circle, and this image was reconstructed as a virtual true lateral radiograph. Following Schöttle's method, the point of intersection was described by their anterior-posterior and proximal-distal positions. As a control population, 29 age- and gender-matched patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries were also analysed.

RESULTS

The points in RPD patients were located significantly posterior (-2.5 ± 2.3 mm, p < 0.01) to the line representing an extension of the posterior cortex of the femur and distal (- 6.9 ± 2.4 mm, p < 0.01) to the posterior origin of the medial femoral condyle compared with those in the control population. The mean reference point of RPD patients was located in a 3.8-mm posterior and 4.4-mm distal position compared with Schöttle's point.

CONCLUSIONS

An anatomical and radiographic femoral reference point of the MPFL on a true lateral virtual radiograph was described with our method. In patients with RPD, this reference point was identified to be more posterior and distal to Schöttle's point. More anatomical and individualized MPFL reconstruction will be secured using our method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation with genu valgum

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is a well-established procedure for addressing recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) in young patients. However, despite being a promising procedure for RPD with genu valgum, there is a scarcity of reports on simultaneous MPFLR and closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (CWDFO). The purpose of the present study was to observe and analyse the clinical and imaging findings of CWDFO combined with MPFLR for RPD with genu valgum.

METHODS

From May 2015 to April 2018, 25 patients with RPD and genu valgum were surgically treated in our department. Anteroposterior long-leg, weight-bearing, lower-extremity radiographs, lateral radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of the patellofemoral joint were obtained, and the anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), weight-bearing line rate (WBLR), patellar height, patellar lateral shift (PLS) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were analysed. Validated knee scores, such as the Kujala, Lysholm, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Tegner socres, were evaluated preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

25 patients, with an average age of 19.8 years (14-27), were evaluated. During the 2-year follow-up period, all patients were able to achieve a better sports level without any problems, with no recurrence of patellar instability. Compared with preoperation, the aFTA, mLDFA, WBLR and PLS showed statistically significant improvement following the procedure (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, no significant differences in the Insall index and TT-TG distance were found. The mean Kujala score, average Lysholm score, VAS score and Tegner socres showed significant postoperative improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

CWDFO combined with MPFLR is a suitable treatment for RPD with genu valgum, and can lead to significant improvement in the clinical and imaging findings of the knee in the short term.

MRI following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: assessment of imaging features found with post-operative pain, arthritis, and graft failure

OBJECTIVE

To assess MR features following MPFL reconstruction and determine their influence on post-operative pain, progressive arthritis, or graft failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study on 38 patients with MPFL reconstruction and a post-operative MRI between January 2010 and June 2019. Two radiologists assessed MPFL graft signal, graft thickness, femoral screw, femoral tunnel widening, and patellofemoral cartilage damage. The third performed patellofemoral instability measurements. All three assessed femoral tunnel position with final result determined by majority consensus. Imaging findings were evaluated in the setting of post-operative pain, patellofemoral arthritis, and MPFL graft failure including need for MPFL revision. Statistics included chi-square, Fisher's exact test, t test, and kappa.

RESULTS

Mean graft thickness was 6.0 ± 1.8 mm; 24% of the grafts were diffusely hypointense. Mean femoral tunnel widening was 2.5 ± 1.8 mm; 34% of the femoral screws were broken or extruded. Fifty-two percent of the patients had no interval cartilage change. Non-anatomic femoral tunnels were found in 66% of patients, including in all 9 patients requiring revision MPFL reconstruction (p = 0.013). Revised MPFL grafts had more abnormal femoral screws compared to those that did not (67% vs. 24%) (p = 0.019). Other MR features did not significantly influence the evaluated outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The need for revision MPFL reconstruction occurs more frequently when there is a non-anatomic femoral tunnel and broken or extruded femoral screws. The appearance of the MPFL graft itself is not an influencing factor for post-operative pain, progression of patellofemoral arthritis, or graft failure.

The presence of a preoperative high-grade J-sign and femoral tunnel malposition are associated with residual graft laxity after MPFL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyse the risk factors associated with residual graft laxity after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD).

METHODS

A total of 312 consecutive patients (354 knees) with clinically diagnosed RPD who underwent MPFL-R from 2011 to 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Postoperative MPFL graft stability was assessed with patellofemoral stress radiography, and if the patellar central ridge surpassed the apex of the lateral femoral trochlea, the reconstructed MPFL was defined as having residual graft laxity. Finally, 15 patients who exhibited MPFL residual graft laxity (study group) were matched in a 1:2 fashion to 30 control participants (control group), who showed a normal postoperative patellar stability on stress radiography. Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) was used to identify patients with a high-grade J-sign. Femoral tunnel position was assessed using 3D-CT to identify cases with femoral tunnel malposition. Potential predictors of MPFL residual graft laxity, including age, sex, a preoperative high-grade J-sign, femoral tunnel malposition, and several radiological parameters, were assessed by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A preoperative high-grade J-sign was identified in 66.7% of the study group, which was significantly higher than that the 13.3% in the control group (P = 0.001). In addition, the presence of a preoperative high-grade J-sign (odds ratio, 11.9 [95% CI, 1.7-82.8]; P = 0.012) and femoral tunnel malposition (odds ratio, 8.2 [95% CI, 1.2-58.0]; P = 0.036) were determined to be independent risk factors associated with residual graft laxity after MPFL-R.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a preoperative high-grade J-sign and femoral tunnel malposition are associated with residual graft laxity after MPFL-R in patients with RPD. These results may provide additional information for counselling patients on residual graft laxity after MPFL-R.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

[Research progress in femoral tunnel positioning points of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction]

Objective

To review the research progress of location methods and the best femoral insertion position of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction of femoral tunnel, and provide reference for surgical treatment.

Methods

The literature about femoral insertion position of the MPFL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of MPFL, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of femoral tunnel positioning methods were summarized.

Results

The accurate establishment of the femoral anatomical tunnel is crucial to the success of MPFL reconstruction. At present, there are mainly two kinds of methods for femoral insertion: radiographic landmark positioning method and anatomical landmark positioning method. Radiographic landmark positioning method has such advantages as small incision and simple operation, but it can not be accurately positioned for patients with severe femoral trochlear dysplasia. It is suggested to combine with the anatomical landmark positioning method. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified positioning standard. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional design software can accurately assist in the MPFL reconstruction, which has become a new trend.

Conclusion

Femoral tunnel positioning of the MPFL reconstruction is very important. The current positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Personalized positioning is a new trend and has not been widely used in clinic, its effectiveness needs further research and clinical practice and verification.

Femoral Origin Anatomy of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex: Implications for Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To report the shape and orientation of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) footprint on the medial femur and describe the difference between the proximal (medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament, MQTFL) and distal (medial patellofemoral ligament, MPFL) fibers.

METHODS

In 20 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint on the medial femur was exposed. Images of the medial femur were analyzed using ImageJ software. The length and width of the MPFC footprint were described to the nearest 0.1 mm; the angle of its long axis was described relative to the axis of the femoral shaft (0.1°). The footprint's most proximal and distal margins were described in relation to the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle. The differences between each were compared using paired t tests.

RESULTS

17 knees from 10 cadavers were included in this study. The MPFC footprint had a length of 11.7 ± 1.8 mm and a width of 1.7 ± 0.4 mm. The long axis of the footprint was at an angle 14.6° ± 16.6° anterior to the axis of the femoral shaft. The most proximal (MQTFL) fibers originated 7.4 ± 3.8 mm anterior and 1.8 ± 4.7 mm distal to the adductor tubercle and 4.1 ± 2.9 mm posterior and 8.4 ± 5.6 mm proximal to the medial epicondyle. The most distal (MPFL) fibers originated 4.9 ± 4.2 mm anterior and 12.7 ± 4.3 mm distal to the adductor tubercle, as well as 7.1 ± 2.4 mm posterior and 0.5 ± 5.6 mm distal to the medial epicondyle. The distal margin of the femoral MPFC footprint was 10.9 ± 1.7 mm distal (p < .001) and 2.6 ± 3.2 mm more posterior (p = .005) than the proximal margin.

CONCLUSIONS

The femoral footprint of the MPFC has a length almost 7 times greater than its width, with the distal margin being 10.9 mm distal and 2.6 mm posterior to the proximal margin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This differential anatomy within the femoral origin suggests that MPFL and MQTFL reconstruction may require separate positions of femoral fixation to recreate the anatomy of these fibers.

The Ribbon-shaped Femoral Footprint of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: Implications for Reconstruction

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary static stabilizer to lateral translation of the patella and serves as part of the medial patellar soft tissue restraints. Because of the sensitivity of MPFL graft function after reconstruction to the position of the femoral tunnel, many studies have aimed to identify the exact point of the femoral origin, as well as defining techniques to confirm this position intraoperatively. We describe the ribbon-shaped footprint of the MPFL on the medial femur and the associated difficulty in identifying the origin as a single "point." Varying isometry and biomechanical functions have been shown to exist within the most proximal and most distal fibers, suggesting the function of the MPFL may not be fully recreated with a tubular graft in a round tunnel. We review the anatomical descriptions of the elongated femoral footprint of the MPFL and describe our surgical technique to recreate this.

Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Functional Outcome After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction at Midterm Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (iMPFLR) is increasingly used for the surgical treatment of recurrent patellofemoral instability.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical and radiological predictors that can significantly influence the functional outcomes after an iMPFLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients (112 ligament reconstructions) who underwent iMPFLR were evaluated with a mean ± SD follow-up of 59 ± 33 months (range, 12-123 months). Functional International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Kujala scores were assessed preoperatively and every 12 months. Radiological assessment of patellar height and tilt (Laurin angle, Merchant angle, Maldague classification) and computed tomography (CT) scan measurement of patellar tilt (contracted and relaxed quadriceps) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance were performed preoperatively and at 6 months. Femoral tunnel position was assessed following the criteria formulated by Schöttle. The amount of femoral tunnel widening was measured by means of 3-dimensional CT scan at 6 months. Predictors were determined from univariate and multivariate regression analyses integrating clinical and radiological criteria pre- and postoperatively. The dependent variable was defined as the difference between pre- and postoperative scores.

RESULTS

Between pre- and postoperative measurement at last follow-up, a significant improvement for IKDC and Kujala functional scores was observed (Kujala: 57 ± 11.3 to 87 ± 12.9, P < .001; IKDC: 47.8 ± 13.1 to 79 ± 15.8, P < .001). Demographics (age, body mass index, sex), dislocation characteristics (number of dislocations, time between first dislocation and surgery, age at first dislocation, mechanism of first dislocation, knee side), clinical data (frontal limb alignment, hyperlaxity, recurvatum, pre- and postoperative range of motion), and complications (quadriceps atrophy, complex regional pain syndrome) did not influence functional scores. The predictors of lower improvement in functional scores included small correction of the patellar tilt reported on the CT scan measurement, malpositioning of the femoral tunnel, and a widening of this tunnel near the medial cortex. Malpositioning of the femoral tunnel was correlated with tunnel widening, and patients with anterior and proximal malpositioning experienced stiffness in flexion.

CONCLUSION

Overall, iMPFLR demonstrated good outcomes. Predictors influencing the functional results were identified. Less improvement in clinical outcome was reported for patients with a high preoperative patellar tilt and only a small correction in tilt and for those who had femoral tunnel malpositioning, which was correlated with tunnel widening.

Anteromedial Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Improves Results of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability in Patients With Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance of 17 to 20 mm

PURPOSE

To compare the midterm clinical outcomes of anteromedialization tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (TTO+MPFLR) with MPFLR alone (MPFLRa) for the treatment of recurrent patellar instability (RPI) in patients with a tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) of 17 to 20 mm.

METHODS

From January 2008 to August 2013, patients with RPI and a TT-TG of 17 to 20 mm were divided into 2 groups: TTO+MPFLR or MPFLRa. Subjects were evaluated for J sign classification (1-4+); patellar glide (1-4+); the apprehension test; increased femoral anteversion; the Caton index; trochlear dysplasia; TT-TG; and Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner scores. Kujala improvement was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-two subjects were evaluated, 18 in the TTO+MPFLR group and 24 in the MPFLRa group. Mean follow-up time was 40.86 months (range, 24-60 months). Demographics between the groups were not different. Preoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding J sign classification; patellar glide; the apprehension test; increased femoral anteversion; the Caton index; trochlear dysplasia; TT-TG; and Kujala, Lysholm, IKDC, and Tegner scores. Postoperative J sign classification mean results comparing TTO+MPFLR and MPFLRa, respectively, were 1 and 1.33 (P = .006). Improvement was significantly higher in the TTO+MPFLR group in all scores except for Tegner. Kujala improvement, 30.27 and 23.95, respectively (P = .003), was also clinically significant, favoring TTO+MPFLR. Lysholm improvement was 40.5 and 36.2, respectively (P = .02), and IKDC improvement was 38.59 and 31.6, respectively (P = .002). There were no reported recurrent subluxations or dislocations in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

TTO+MPFLR resulted in better functional outcome scores and patellar kinematics compared with MPFLRa in the surgical treatment of RPI in patients with a TT-TG distance of 17 to 20 mm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Does patella alta lead to worse clinical outcome in patients who undergo isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this systematic review is to determine the effect of patella height on clinical outcomes after isolated MPFL reconstruction for patella instability. Our primary hypothesis is that patients with patella alta report similar outcomes after isolated MPFL reconstruction compared to patients with normal patella height.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 10th 2018. Studies were identified using synonyms for "medial patellofemoral ligament", "reconstruction" and "patella alta".

RESULTS

The search resulted in 467 reports on PubMed, 175 on EMBASE and 3 on the Cochrane Library. We included and analyzed in detail six studies describing outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with regard to patellar height. We found that both patients with patella alta and normal patella height reported satisfactory outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. However, because of applied exclusion criteria in the included studies the total number of patients with severe patella alta was small (13/74 patients with patella alta, 18%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current literature we suggest that additional tibial tubercle distalisation is not mandatory in patients with mild patella alta (Caton-Deschamps Index 1.2-1.4). To assess the best indications for different surgical procedures for patients with patella instability future research is needed to develop a clear and uniform definition of relevant patella alta.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Allowing one quadrant of patellar lateral translation during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction successfully limits maltracking without overconstraining the patella

PURPOSE

Graft tensioning during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction typically allows for lateral patellar translation within the trochlear groove. Computational simulation was performed to relate the allowed patellar translation to patellofemoral kinematics and contact pressures.

METHODS

Multibody dynamic simulation models were developed to represent nine knees with patellar instability. Dual limb squatting was simulated representing the pre-operative condition and simulated MPFL reconstruction. The graft was tensioned to allow 10, 5, and 0 mm of patellar lateral translation at 30° of knee flexion. The patellofemoral contact pressure distribution was quantified using discrete element analysis.

RESULTS

For the 5 and 10 mm conditions, patellar lateral shift decreased significantly at 0° and 20°. The 0 mm condition significantly decreased lateral shift for nearly all flexion angles. All graft conditions significantly decreased lateral tilt at 0°, with additional significant decreases for the 5 and 0 mm conditions. The 0 mm condition significantly increased the maximum medial pressure at multiple flexion angles, increasing by 57% at 30°, but did not alter the maximum lateral pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Allowing 5 to 10 mm of patellar lateral translation limits lateral maltracking, thereby decreasing the risk of post-operative recurrent instability. Allowing no patellar translation during graft tensioning reduces maltracking further, but can overconstrain the patella, increasing the pressure applied to medial patellar cartilage already fibrillated or eroded from an instability episode.

Dynamic tracking influenced by anatomy following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: Computational simulation

BACKGROUND

Continued patellar instability can occur following medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Computational simulation of function was used to investigate the influence of the lateral position of the tibial tuberosity, trochlear dysplasia and patella alta on lateral patellar tracking following MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

Multibody dynamic simulation models were developed to represent nine knees being treated for recurrent patellar instability. Knee extension against gravity and dual limb squatting were simulated with and without simulated MPFL reconstruction. Graft resting lengths were set to allow 10mm and five millimeters of patellar lateral translation at 30° of knee flexion. The bisect offset index, lateral tibial tuberosity to posterior cruciate ligament tibial attachment (TT-PCL) distance, lateral trochlear inclination, and Caton-Deschamps index were quantified at every five degrees of knee flexion to characterize lateral tracking, lateral position of the tibial tuberosity, trochlear dysplasia, and patella alta, respectively. For the pre-operative and post-operative conditions and each type of motion, bisect offset index was correlated with the anatomical parameters using stepwise multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

For both motions, the pre-operative and post-operative bisect offset indices were significantly correlated with lateral trochlear inclination and lateral TT-PCL distance. For both motions, the adjusted r² decreased with MPFL reconstruction, but was still approximately 0.5 for MPFL reconstruction allowing five millimeters of lateral translation.

CONCLUSION

MPFL reconstruction decreases but does not eliminate lateral maltracking related to trochlear dysplasia and a lateralized tibial tuberosity. Patients with these pathologies are likely at the highest risk for instability related to maltracking following MPFL reconstruction.