Outcomes of Inside-out Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Multiligament Reconstruction in the Knee

Meniscal Lesions in Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries

Introduction

Multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are rare and complex knee lesions and are potentially associated with intra-articular injuries, especially meniscal tears. Understanding the meniscal tear patterns involved in MLKI can help the orthopedic surgeon treat these complex injuries.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, classification, and treatment of meniscal injuries in a cohort of patients with MLKIs and carry out an updated review of the evidence available.

Materials and methods

Descriptive retrospective study. Patients with a history of reconstructive surgery for MLKI performed between 2013 and 2023 were included. Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study. Patient demographics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study, and operative reports were reviewed. Groups were then formed based on ligament injury patterns. Meniscal tears were identified by MRI and through diagnostic arthroscopy for each patient. The association between meniscal lesions and injury patterns was calculated through Fisher's exact test. Agreement between the presence of meniscal tear on MRI and in diagnostic arthroscopy was measured using the kappa test. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were calculated. We inferred the presence of a meniscal tear by injury pattern using the Agresti-Coull confidence interval. For the statistical analysis, a significance of 5% and a confidence interval of 95% were considered.

Results

Seventy patients with MLKIs were included, with a mean age of 30.69 years (SD 10.65). Forty-seven patients had meniscal lesions (67.1%). Of them, 6 had only medial meniscus tears, 31 had only lateral meniscus tears, and 10 had lesions of both menisci, comprising 57 meniscal lesions in total. An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) + medial collateral ligament/posteromedial corner (MCL/PMC) was the most common injury pattern (52.86% of all patients). Of these 37 patients, 78.38% had meniscal injuries, and most of them (68.97%) were only lateral meniscus injuries. The odds ratio (OR) of having a meniscal tear when having an ACL + medial-side injury was 4.83 (95% CI; 0.89-26.17). Patients with ACL + lateral-side injury pattern had meniscal tears in 42.86%. The lateral meniscus was involved in 100% of these patients. 62.5% of medial meniscus injuries were treated by meniscal repair, and 37.5% by partial meniscectomy. 58.54% of lateral meniscus injuries were treated by meniscal repair, and 39.02% by partial meniscectomy. Agreement calculated using the kappa test between MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy for medial meniscal lesions was 78.57%, and for lateral meniscal lesions was 84.29%.

Conclusion

The ligament injury pattern and the side of the injured collateral ligament influenced the incidence and laterality of meniscal damage. ACL + medial-side injuries were shown to have significantly greater meniscal damage compared to other injury patterns. It is crucial to have a high index of suspicion, obtain a high-quality MRI, and arthroscopically evaluate any possible meniscal lesions in MLKIs.

Early surgery and number of injured ligaments are associated with postoperative stiffness following multi-ligament knee injury surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the rate of stiffness after multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) surgery and identify potential risk factors associated with postoperative stiffness.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. Registration was done on the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022321849). A literature search of PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted in October 2022 for clinical studies reporting postoperative stiffness after MLKI surgery. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index of Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) grading system. The following variables were extracted from studies for correlation to postoperative stiffness: study characteristics, cohort demographics, Schenk classification, neurovascular injury, mechanism of injury, external fixator placement, timing of surgery, and concomitant knee injuries.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies comprising 4,159 patients who underwent MLKI surgery met the inclusion criteria, including two Level-II, fourteen Level-III, and twenty Level-IV studies. The average MINOR score of the studies was 14. The stiffness rate after MLKI was found to be 9.8% (95% CI 0.07-0.13; p < 0.01; I2 = 87%), and the risk of postoperative stiffness was significantly lower for patients with two ligaments injured compared to patients with ≥ 3 ligaments injured (OR = 0.45, 95% CI (0.26-0.79), p = 0.005; I2 = 0%). The results of the pooled analysis showed early surgery (< 3 weeks) resulted in significantly increased odds of postoperative stiffness compared with delayed surgery (≥ 3 weeks) (OR = 2.18; 95% CI 1.11-4.25; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). However, age, gender, body mass index, energy of injury, and neurovascular injury were not associated with an increased risk of postoperative stiffness (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Performing surgery within the first 3 weeks following MLKI, or concomitant injury of ≥ 3 ligaments, are significantly associated with increased risk of postoperative stiffness. These findings can be utilized by surgeons to decide the timing of surgery for MLKI surgeries especially in which ≥ 3 ligaments are injured.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Multiligamentous Knee Injuries: Current Concepts Review

Multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKI) are rare but devastating injuries that have a potential to cause long-term sequelae and significant morbidity. Frequently occurring concomitantly with knee dislocations (KD), MLKI have many risk factors that influence their incidence and treatment outcomes. Proper understanding of these risk factors can assist the surgeon with evaluation, surgical planning, and managing patient expectations both pre- and postoperatively. The purpose of this review is fourfold: (1) identify the risk factors and injuries associated with MLKI, (2) describe factors implicated in the treatment of MLKI, (3) report the effect of these risk factors on outcomes of MLKI, and (4) provide a brief insight into MLKI at our tertiary referral academic care center. This was a retrospective review of literature relevant to MLKI. Studies that described injuries, risk factors, treatment techniques, or outcomes associated with MLKI were included in our review. A total of 35 studies (consisting of level 3 and 4 evidence) published between 2009 and 2020 were found and included in our analysis. In addition, 25 patients who underwent treatment for MLKI at the University of Chicago Medical Center between December 2015 and December 2019 were included in our analysis. MLKI tend to occur in the younger male population. Increasing age, body mass index, and severity of the injury have been correlated with worse functional and patient-reported outcomes. Operative treatment is indicated for MLKI; however, timing and repair versus reconstruction is still debated, and is often decided on a patient by patient basis. Retrospective cohort studies have indicated that reconstruction may be favored; however, further more rigorous studies are needed to better characterize this finding. MLKIs are devastating injuries with significant variability in presentation, treatment, and outcome. Variations in these are largely attributable to the mechanism and severity of injury, timing, and surgeon preference. A holistic approach, and understanding of the present literature, is required to best optimize patient outcome.

Incidence and type of meniscal tears in multilligament injured knees

PURPOSE

Meniscal injuries occurring during multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKI) are underreported. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence and type of meniscal tears seen at the time of multi-ligament reconstruction surgery compared to those occurring during isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical treatment for MLKI and ACL-only injuries between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Two-hundred and thirty-five patients were included in the MLKI group. There were 131 chronic injuries and 104 acute injuries. Two-hundred and twenty-two ACL-only chronic injuries were used as a control group for comparison with the chronic MLKI group. Demographic data, type of meniscal tears, ligament injury patterns (Schenck classification) and time from injury to surgery were recorded. A delayed procedure was defined by a 4-week interval after the knee injury.

RESULTS

A meniscus was torn in 69 knees (29.4%): 36 knees (15.3%) with an isolated medial meniscus tear, 33 knees (17.9%) with an isolated lateral meniscus tear,.Nine knees (3.8%) had both menisci torn. MLKI with medial or lateral-sided bicruciate ligament injuries (KDIIIM-KDIIIL) were significantly associated with a lower rate of meniscal tears than knee injuries involving the ACL-only and medial/lateral-sided ligament injuries (KDI) (medial-sided injuries p = 0.025; lateral-sided injuries p = 0.049). Lateral-sided injuries had significantly less meniscal damage than medial-sided injuries: 22/124 (17.7%) vs. 41/100 (41%); (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found for frequency, type and distribution of meniscal tears between acute and chronic MLKI surgery. ACL-only chronic injuries were associated with a higher rate of meniscal tears: 123/222 knees (55.4%) vs. 35/131 (26.9%) chronic MLKI; (p < 0.001), mainly involving the medial meniscus: 102/222 (46%) vs. 18/131 (13.7%); (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Meniscal tears were less common in the MLKI group than in the isolated ACL injury group. The degree of ligament injury patterns and the side of the injured collateral ligament influenced the type and incidence of meniscal damage. Contrary to isolated ACL injuries, a delayed procedure was not associated with a higher rate of meniscal lesions but did influence the type of treatment. Understanding of meniscal tears patterns in MLKI helps to improve the treatment management of these complex injuries.

Spontaneous Healing of a Posteriorly Displaced Lateral Meniscus Bucket-Handle Tear in a Multiligament Knee Injury: A Case Report

CASE

Bucket-handle meniscus tears (BHMTs) typically involve the medial meniscus and often occur with concomitant rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. We report an unusual case of a polytrauma patient who sustained a bicruciate multiligament knee injury (MLKI) with a posteriorly displaced lateral BHMT that spontaneously healed after reduction of the fragment. At the 2-year follow-up, the lateral meniscus was clinically stable without pain.

CONCLUSION

A lateral BHMT with a posteriorly displaced fragment produced an atypical magnetic resonance imaging presentation in a bicruciate MLKI. Meniscal repair was aborted because of extravasation and concerns of compartment syndrome, but spontaneous healing occurred after fragment reduction.

Complex Repair and Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in KDs III and IV Multiligamentous Knee Injuries-Results of Mid-Term Follow-up

The purpose of the present study was to describe the longitudinal outcomes of acute repair of extra-articular structure and anatomical reconstruction of cruciate ligament for knee dislocations (KDs) III and IV multiligamentous knee injuries. Forty-seven patients with an acute KD III or IV were treated with one-stage management within 9.2 days. Forty-five KDs III and IV with a follow-up at a mean of 53.2 months were evaluated. The mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score were 81.5 ± 0.7, 89.6 ± 1.2, and 6.8 ± 0.5, respectively. Comparing preoperative data with those at the latest follow-up, significant improvements in IKDC score (p < 0.01), Lysholm score (p < 0.01), and Tegner score (p < 0.01) were noted in all groups. Comparing contralateral knee stability, no statistical differences were found including the varus/valgus (0 degree/30 degrees) and Telos stress radiography. So, acute repair of extra-articular structure and anatomical reconstruction of cruciate ligament resulted in satisfactory outcomes for KDs III and IV multiligamentous knee injuries.

Advances in Regenerative Sports Medicine Research

Regenerative sports medicine aims to address sports and aging-related conditions in the locomotor system using techniques that induce tissue regeneration. It also involves the treatment of meniscus and ligament injuries in the knee, Achilles’ tendon ruptures, rotator cuff tears, and cartilage and bone defects in various joints, as well as the regeneration of tendon–bone and cartilage–bone interfaces. There has been considerable progress in this field in recent years, resulting in promising steps toward the development of improved treatments as well as the identification of conundrums that require further targeted research. In this review the regeneration techniques currently considered optimal for each area of regenerative sports medicine have been reviewed and the time required for feasible clinical translation has been assessed. This review also provides insights into the direction of future efforts to minimize the gap between basic research and clinical applications.

Cartilage and Meniscus Injuries Are More Common in Patients Undergoing Delayed Multiligament Reconstruction

The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of meniscus and cartilage pathology in multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) and determine the relationship between surgical timing and injury mechanism with degree of intra-articular injury. Patients with surgically treated MLKIs over a 15-year period were retrospectively reviewed and grouped based on surgical intervention, time to intervention, and injury mechanism. The presence or absence of meniscus and chondral injury were recorded at the time of surgery. Surgical intervention within 6 weeks of injury was deemed acute, while surgery occurring more than 6 weeks from injury was classified as delayed. Over the 15-year study period, 207 patients with MLKIs were identified. Compared with acutely managed patients, the delayed intervention group had significantly more meniscus (p = 0.03) and cartilage (p < 0.01) pathology. Meniscus injury rates in MLKIs sustained during sporting activity did not differ from nonsporting injuries (p = 0.63). However, the nonsporting group had significantly more chondral injuries (p < 0.01). High-energy injury mechanism was associated with increased cartilage (p = 0.02), but not meniscus (p = 0.61) injury rates. In conclusion, surgical reconstruction of MLKIs delayed for more than 6 weeks was associated with increased meniscus and cartilage pathology.

Incidence of Associated Lesions of Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

The incidence of concomitant injuries, including meniscal and cartilage injuries, has not been adequately reported in previous studies on multiligament knee injury (MLKI) because their primary focal points have been the degree of ligament injury, treatment strategy, involvement of other soft tissues, and neurovascular injury.

Purpose:

To analyze the incidence of associated lesions in MLKIs, including medial and lateral meniscal injuries, cartilage lesions, and complications.

Study Design:

Systemic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched between inception and April 30, 2020. Studies were included if they reported the incidence rates of medial and/or lateral meniscal tears and cartilage injuries in cases of MLKIs. For the meta-analysis, data were extracted on clinical outcomes measured according to the number of medial and/or lateral meniscal tears, cartilage injuries, and complications.

Results:

A total of 45 studies were included in the MLKI analysis (3391 patients). The pooled rate of medial meniscal tears was 30.4% (95% CI, 24.1%-37.1%; P < .0001; I² = 85.8%). The pooled rate of lateral meniscal tears was 27.5% (95% CI, 20.3%-35.3%; P < .0001; I² = 89.6%). The pooled rate of cartilage injuries was 27.5% (95% CI, 22.1%-33.3%; P < .0001; I² = 86.8%). The pooled rates of peroneal nerve injuries, vascular injuries, and arthrofibrosis were 19.2% (95% CI, 14.2%-24.7%; P < .001; I² = 81.3%), 18.4% (95% CI, 13.2%-24.3%; P < .0001; I² = 81.0%), and 11.2% (95% CI, 8.1%-14.7%; P = .0018; I² = 54.0%), respectively.

Conclusion:

The pooled rates of meniscal tears and cartilage injuries concomitant with MLKIs were high, ranging from 27% to 30%, and the pooled rates of peroneal nerve injury, vascular injury, and arthrofibrosis were considerable, ranging from 11% to 19%. The influence of these associated lesions on clinical results should be evaluated in future clinical studies.

Excellent medium-term survival of an all-inside tensionable knotted suture device justifies repair of most meniscal tears encountered during reconstructive knee ligament surgery

PURPOSE

All-inside meniscal repair devices have evolved to allow surgeons to undertake complex repairs in a timely and efficient manner. This is advantageous in active patients, where meniscus preservation is critical in preserving joint function and stability. The aim of the study was to evaluate the failure rate of all-inside meniscal repair performed in patients undergoing reconstructive ligament surgery using a particular meniscal repair device.

METHODS

Patients were identified using a single-site prospectively maintained patient registry. Primary outcome was failure, defined as return to surgery with documented failure of repair. Complication rates and functional scores were also recorded. Patients in whom meniscal repair failure was identified were further assessed, to identify any common features.

RESULTS

Over an 8-year period, 323 patients underwent meniscal repair at the time of ligament reconstruction, compared to 244 meniscectomies. Of these, 286 patients underwent repair using an all-inside suture device. One-hundred and twenty-seven repairs were to the medial meniscus only, 124 were lateral, and in 35 patients both menisci were repaired. Follow-up was to a median of 51.5 months. There were 31 (9.7%) failures reported at a median of 22 months post-operatively (IQR 13.5-41.5). Medial repair failures were seen more frequently than lateral (13.6% versus 5.6% OR 2.62 95% CI 1.17-5.88 p = 0.022). Failure of ACL reconstruction was associated with meniscal repair failure (OR 5.83 95% CI 1.55-21.95 p = 0.0039). Multi-ligament reconstruction was undertaken in 70/286 patients receiving meniscal repair and was not associated with failure (OR 1.3 95% CI 0.57-2.98 p = 0.51). Mode number of all-inside sutures used was 3 in both medial and lateral repairs (Range 1-9 lateral; 1-7 medial).

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside repair is a safe and versatile technique which can be used in the majority of meniscal tears encountered during ligament reconstruction with excellent mid-term success. Failure is seen more commonly in medial sided repairs and with failure of ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Which factors are associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair?

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the potential factors associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair

Methods Patients who received partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair in our institution from Jan 2015 to Dec 2019 were included in current study. The inclusion criteria were (1) meniscus tear treated using meniscectomy or repair, (2) with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, (3) not multiligamentous injury. Demographic data, including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), injury-to-surgery interval and intra-articular factors such as the location of injury, medial or lateral, ACL rupture or not and the option of procedure (partial meniscectomy or repair) were documented from medical records. Univariate analysis consisted of chi-square. Multivariate logistic regression was then performed to adjust for confounding factors.

Results 592 patients including 399 males and 193 females with a mean age of 28.7 years (range from 10 to 75 years) were included in current study. In the univariate analysis, male (p = 0.002), patients aged 40 years or younger (p < 0.001), increased weight (p = 0.010), Posterior meniscus torn (0.011), concurrent ACL ruputure (p < 0.001), lateral meniscus (p = 0.039) and early surgery (p < 0.001) were all associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair. However, After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that age (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 - 0.68, p = 0.002), ACL injury (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.97 – 7.21, p < 0.001), side of menisci (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.43 – 7.55, p = 0.005), site of tear (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.07 – 0.32, p < 0.001), and duration of injury (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28 – 0.82, p = 0.008) were associated with the prevalence of meniscus repair.

Conclusions Meniscal tear in aged patients especially those with concomitant ACL injury is likely to be repaired. Additionally, in order to increase the prevalence of repair and slow down progression of OA, the surgical procedure should be performed within two weeks after meniscus tear especially when the tear is located at lateral meniscal posterior.

Study design

Case-control study; level of evidence, 3.

Clinical Outcomes of Inside-Out Meniscal Repair According to Anatomic Zone of the Meniscal Tear

Background

There is significant discrepancy in the reported vascularity within the meniscus, and a progressively diminishing blood supply may indicate a differential healing capacity of tears that is dependent on the affected meniscal zone.

Purpose

To examine the outcomes after inside-out meniscal repair in all 3 meniscal vascularity zones.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Patients were included if they underwent inside-out meniscal repair by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2014 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the meniscal tear location (red-red, red-white, and white-white zones) as determined during an intraoperative assessment. Patient-reported outcome scores were obtained at final follow-up.

Results

A total of 173 patients (mean age, 33.6 ± 14.3 years) were included, with a mean follow-up of 2.9 ± 0.9 years. All patients demonstrated significant improvements with inside-out meniscal repair from preoperatively to postoperatively, regardless of the meniscal tear location. Patients who underwent meniscal repair in the red-red and red-white zones had significantly increased postoperative Tegner, Lysholm, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores compared with patients who underwent meniscal repair in the white-white zone (P < .05). Patients who underwent acute repair (≤6 weeks) demonstrated significantly higher improvements on the Tegner activity scale (acute: 5.8 ± 2.2; chronic: 4.6 ± 2.2; P = .001) and Lysholm score (acute: 85.6 ± 13.3; chronic: 80.8 ± 13.5; P = .025) compared with patients treated beyond 6 weeks from injury, regardless of the meniscal tear zone. Patients with grade IV femoral condyle chondral lesions at the time of surgery had significantly inferior outcomes compared with patients with grade I through III chondral lesions, regardless of the meniscal tear zone. Three patients (1.7%) subsequently underwent revision inside-out repair, and 3 (1.7%) underwent partial meniscectomy.

Conclusion

Patients who underwent inside-out meniscal repair demonstrated significant improvements on subjective outcome measures at a minimum 2-year follow-up, regardless of the meniscal tear zone. Inside-out meniscal repair is recommended for potentially reparable meniscal tears in all 3 vascular zones; however, improved outcomes can be achieved when performed acutely, in the absence of full-thickness femoral condyle chondral injuries, and in the red-red and red-white zones.

Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Tears or Meniscal Aging-That Is the Question

Meniscal tears constitute one of the most common pathologies in sports medicine. Although frequently grouped by shape, location, and size for didactic purposes, considering them according to their cause is probably the single most important factor to predict their behavior and prognosis. For instance, an acute traumatic tear and a degenerative tear of the meniscus are located on opposite ends of the spectrum of the meniscal pathology (which is comparable to focal chondral defects and osteoarthritis). For this reason, surgically addressing a non-obstructive degenerative meniscus does not always address the cause of the problem (inherent catabolic state) or the character of the symptoms (due to concomitant osteoarthritis or overload), and therefore, outcomes have been reported to be unpredictable. Of note, several recent randomized clinical trials allowed for a single-way crossover, which could act as a major confounder related to patient recruitment and expectation bias. Considering these thoughts along with the associated media coverage, there is a global trend to treat degenerative tears with a more conservative approach. Despite this, the most appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic degenerative tears for which a trial of conservative measures failed is yet to be determined.