Is There a Role for Internal Bracing and Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament? A Systematic Literature Review

Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair-morphological and quantitative assessment by 7-T MRI and clinical outcome after 1.5 years

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess morphological and quantitative changes of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and cartilage after ACL repair.

METHODS

7T MRI of the knee was acquired in 31 patients 1.5 years after ACL repair and in 13 controls. Proton density-weighted images with fat saturation (PD-fs) were acquired to assess ACL width, signal intensity, elongation, and fraying. T2/T2* mapping was performed for assessment of ACL and cartilage. Segmentation of the ACL, femoral, and tibial cartilage was carried out at 12 ROIs. The outcome evaluation consisted of the Lysholm Knee Score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and clinical examination.

RESULTS

ACL showed a normal signal intensity in 96.8% and an increased width in 76.5% after repair. Fraying occurred in 22.6% without having an impact on the clinical outcome (Lysholm score: 90.39 ± 9.75, p = 0.76 compared to controls). T2 analysis of the ACL revealed no difference between patients and controls (p = 0.74). Compared to controls, assessment of the femoral and tibial cartilage showed a significant increase of T2* times in all ROIs, except at the posterolateral femur. Patients presented a good outcome in clinical examination with a Lysholm score of 87.19 ± 14.89 and IKDC of 80.23 ± 16.84.

CONCLUSION

T2 mapping results suggest that the tissue composition of the ACL after repair is similar to that of a native ACL after surgery, whereas the ACL exhibits an increased width. Fraying of the ACL can occur without having any impact on functional outcomes. T2* analysis revealed early degradation at the cartilage.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

MRI represents a noninvasive diagnostic tool for the morphological and compositional assessment of the anterior cruciate ligament after repair, whereas knowledge about post-surgical alterations is crucial for adequate imaging interpretation.

KEY POINTS

• There has been renewed interest in repairing the anterior cruciate ligament with a proximally torn ligament. • T2 times of the anterior cruciate ligament do not differ between anterior cruciate ligament repair patients and controls. • T2 mapping may serve as a surrogate for the evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament after repair.

Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair revision rates are increased in skeletally mature patients under the age of 21 compared to reconstruction, while adults (>21 years) show no significant difference: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of age as a risk factor on the revision rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primary repair (ACLPR), dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) and bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) compared to ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for comparative studies comparing outcomes for ACLPR, DIS or BEAR to ACLR. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to assess nondifferentiated and age-differentiated (skeletally mature patients ≤21 and >21 years) ACL revision and reoperation risk, as well as results for subjective outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool 2.0c and Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies tools.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies (n = 1277) were included. ACLR demonstrated a lower nonage-stratified revision risk at 2 years versus ACLPR, DIS and BEAR, but a similar revision risk at 5 years when compared to DIS. However, an age-stratified analysis demonstrated a significantly increased ACLPR revision risk as compared to ACLR in skeletally mature patients ≤21 years of age (risk ratios [RR], 6.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-33.87, p = 0.03), while adults (>21 years) showed no significant difference between groups (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.25-8.91, n.s.). Furthermore, DIS reoperation rates were significantly higher than respective ACLR rates (RR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.35-3.65, p = 0.002), whereas BEAR (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.41-2.75, n.s.) and ACLPR (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.21-3.09, n.s.) showed no differences. IKDC scores were equivalent for all techniques. However, ACLPR exhibited significantly better FJS (mean difference, 11.93; 95% CI, 6.36-17.51, p < 0.0001) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Symptoms (mean difference, 3.01; 95% CI, 0.42-5.60, p = 0.02), along with a lower Tegner activity reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

ACLPR in skeletally mature patients ≤21 years of age is associated with up to a six-fold risk increase for ACL revision surgery compared to ACLR; however, adults (>21 years) present no significant difference. Based on the current data, age emerges as a crucial risk factor and should be considered when deciding on the appropriate treatment option in proximal ACL tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Suture Tape Augmentation Improves Posterior Stability After Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft With Single-Bundle Transtibial Technique

PURPOSE

To assess whether posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with suture tape augmentation can yield more stability after isolated PCLR.

METHODS

A prospective database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary isolated PCLR (control group) or isolated PCLR with suture tape augmentation (study group) from January 2016 to September 2020. We analyzed subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner knee scores; posterior drawer test findings; posterior stress radiographs; and return-to-sports activity rates. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used to evaluate clinical relevance (subjective IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores).

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients were included in this analysis (28 in control group and 31 in study group). The average length of follow-up was similar between the study and control groups (48.6 months vs 47.9 months, P = .800). Knee function was significantly improved in the study group in terms of subjective IKDC scores (85.1 ± 6.4 in study group vs 79.8 ± 6.4 in control group, P = .002), Lysholm scores (86.3 ± 7.4 vs 80.8 ± 7.4, P = .005), and Tegner scores (7.0 ± 1.4 vs 5.6 ± 1.7, P = .006). However, the differences between the control and study groups were less than the MCID for the subjective IKDC score and Lysholm score. In the control and study groups, 21.4% of patients (6 of 28) and 48.4% of patients (15 of 31), respectively, returned to their preinjury sports activity levels (P = .031). At last follow-up, the mean side-to-side difference in posterior laxity was significantly improved in the study group compared with the control group (1.52 ± 0.70 mm in study group vs 3.17 ± 2.01 mm in control group, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary isolated PCLR with suture tape augmentation provides better posterior stability than PCLR without suture tape augmentation at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. No differences between the groups were observed in the percentage of patients who met or exceeded the MCID for the subjective IKDC and Lysholm scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair-Here to Stay or History Repeating Itself?

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to be a prevalent concern among athletes and individuals with an active lifestyle. Traditionally, the standard of care for ACL tears has involved surgical reconstruction using autograft or allograft. This article aims to provide an overview of the evolving landscape of primary ACL repair, examining the current evidence, surgical techniques, patient selection criteria, outcomes, and potential future directions in this field.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Augmented With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Is Equivalent to Hamstring Autograft Reconstruction at Short- and Mid-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes, knee stability and complications, failure, and revision rates after anterior cruciate ligament repair (ACLr) with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with hamstring autograft for primary ACL ruptures at short and mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus was performed. Studies that evaluated patients undergoing ACLr with DIS or ACLR with hamstring autograft were considered for inclusion. Studies were excluded if patients were affected by concomitant meniscal, ligamentous, or chondral injuries needing surgical treatment, because of their potential confounding effect on postoperative outcomes. The Risk of Bias-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The quality of available evidence was rated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation recommendations. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (ID: CRD42023394558).

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of ACLr with DIS versus ACLR with hamstring autograft met the inclusion criteria. No major differences in terms of patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, visual analog scale satisfaction) or rates of complications, revisions, and failures were found in included studies at all time points. Repair showed greater International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form scores at 5 years in one study, whereas ACLR displayed significantly increased knee stability at 6 months and 5 years in 2 different studies, although the clinical relevance of these differences is doubtful.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that ACLr with DIS is not inferior to ACLR with hamstring autograft in terms of rates of clinical outcomes, knee stability, risk of failure, complications, and revision surgery. Therefore, ACLr with DIS may be a viable alternative to ACLR with hamstring autograft in selected patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, systematic review of Level I studies.

Rehabilitation Following ACL Repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation in Female Gymnast: A Resident's Case Report

Introduction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries continue to be a major source of morbidity in gymnastics. The gold standard is to perform an ACL Reconstruction (ACLR). However, injuries to the proximal femoral attachment of the ACL have demonstrated an ability to regenerate. An alternative surgical intervention to the ACLR in this ACL tear subgroup is an ACL repair. The purpose of this case report is to provide a rehabilitation progression for a female gymnast after an ACL repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA).

Case Description

The subject was a 16-year-old female who presented with a Sherman Type 1 proximal avulsion of her ACL. She underwent an ACL repair with IBLA. Physical therapy interventions followed a sequential and multi-phased approach based on time for tissue physiologic healing and individual progression. Patient reported outcomes including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) were assessed in conjunction with isokinetic strength and hop performance testing to determine return to sport readiness.

Outcomes

The subject completed 42 sessions over the course of 26 weeks in addition to a home exercise program. At return to sport, clinically meaningful improvement was observed in patient reported outcomes including the IKDC, ACL-RSI, and OSPRO-YF. Additionally, strength and hop performance surpassed established thresholds of clinical significance. The subject returned to sport at six months post-operatively.

Conclusion

The subject in this case report returned to full participation in gymnastics six months after an ACL repair with internal bracing following a sequential and multi-phased rehabilitation. The primary ACL repair with IBLA appeared beneficial to this patient and could benefit from additional study in other athletes and athletic populations.

Level of Evidence

Level 5.

Rate of Revision Surgery and Associated Risk Factors After Primary Arthroscopic ACL Repair With Additional Suture Augmentation

Background

Recent studies have suggested promising patient-reported outcomes after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with additional suture augmentation (SA).

Purpose

To evaluate the risk for revision surgery and identify patient- and injury-related risk factors after ACL repair with SA in a large patient cohort subject to strict patient selection.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 86 patients (61 female; 93% follow-up rate) who underwent arthroscopic ACL repair with SA between January 2017 and March 2019 by a single surgeon and had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients were selected for surgery with regard to time to surgery (preferably on the day of injury), tear pattern (limited to Sherman types 1 and 2), and tissue quality (intact synovial coverage). Postoperatively, the patients who needed revision surgery were identified and compared with patients who did not undergo revision surgery, using the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric analysis and the Student t test for parametric analysis. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to investigate the survival rate of the ACL repair.

Results

A total of 9 patients (10%; median age, 48 years; interquartile range [IQR], 27-50 years) underwent revision surgery at 12 months postoperatively (IQR, 8-25 months). The median follow-up of patients without revision surgery was 35 months (IQR, 33-44 months). The revision-free survival rate was 97% (95% CI, 93%-100%) after 1 year, 93% (95% CI, 88%-98%) after 2 years, and 90% (95% CI, 83%-97%) after 4 years. Patient-related factors-such as sex (P = .98), age at surgery (P = .459), body mass index (P = .352), and preinjury level of sports (P = .53)-had no significant impact on the survival rate of the ACL repair. Injury-related factors-such as concomitant injuries of the medial (P = .860) and lateral menisci (P = .414) and the medial (P = .801) and lateral collateral ligaments (P = .534) or same-day surgery compared with a delay of surgery of up to 18 days (P = .277)-had no significant impact on the survival rate of the ACL repair.

Conclusion

The revision rate of primary ACL repair with SA at a 2-year follow-up was 10%. Patient- and injury-related factors were not associated with the survival rate of the ACL repair.

Proprioception After Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

BACKGROUND

Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has some potential advantages over the reconstruction technique, which include but are not limited to better knee sensation due to preservation of the natural ACL tissue in patients compared with tendon graft. Proprioception is impaired after ACL injuries and the sense of the joint position is lost.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to compare arthroscopic ACL primary repair and ACL reconstruction techniques clinically and functionally and analyze the differences in proprioception. It was hypothesized that primary repair would restore knee joint proprioception more successfully because the original tissue of the ACL is preserved.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients (34 underwent reconstruction and 29 underwent primary repair between 2017 and 2020) and 33 healthy controls, as well as the healthy knees of the operated groups, were evaluated between 24 and 48 months (mean, 29 months) postoperatively. Patients with proximal femoral avulsion tears and stump quality suitable for repair underwent primary repair, and those with tears outside these criteria underwent reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft. Proprioception was evaluated using the active joint position sensation method during weightbearing, with a digital inclinometer used to measure differences between the target and achieved flexion angles of 15°, 30°, and 60°.

RESULTS

At 15° of knee flexion, the deviation angles for the healthy knee of the reconstruction and primary repair groups were significantly smaller than those of the control group (P < .001), but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of deviation angle at 30° and 60° of flexion. The deviation angle of the operated knees was statistically significantly larger in the reconstruction group than in the primary repair group at all angles. The deviation angles at 15°, 30°, and 60° were 2.83°, 2.66°, and 2.66° in the reconstruction group and 1.00°, 1.00°, and 1.33° in the primary repair group, respectively (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference between the reconstruction and primary repair groups in terms of clinical scores.

CONCLUSION

Primary ACL repair can preserve proprioception in a well-selected patient group. In short-term follow-up, primary repair of the ACL in patients with proximal femoral avulsion tears and stump quality suitable for repair appears to be proprioceptively protective. Future studies are needed to clarify the long-term consequences of primary repair on proprioception in a larger population.

Outcomes of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Repair for Proximal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this study is to compare failure rates among different techniques of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair for the treatment of proximal ACL ruptures. Meta-analysis and systematic review were completed, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Studies from Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed published between June 2011 and June 2022 reporting outcomes of primary ACL repair on proximal tears with a minimum two-year follow-up were included. Primary ACL repair was divided into dynamic, static, and non-augmented repair. The primary outcome was failure rates, and the secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and anterior tibial stability (ATT). Eighteen studies on primary ACL repair were included, with a total of 614 patients (ages ranging from 6 to 65, 60% male). Only two studies were level 1 randomized controlled clinical trials. The static repair had a failure rate of 33 out of 261 (12.6%), non-augmented was 17 out of 179 (9.4%), and dynamic repair was 31 out of 174 (17.8%); no statistically significant difference was found comparing the failure rates (p = 0.090). PROs using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores had weighted averages of 91.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 89.6-93.8) and 94.7 (95% CI: 92.7-96.7), respectively. ATT had a weighted average of 1.668 mm (95% CI: 1.002-2.334). The primary findings of this paper include a 12.6% combined failure rate for primary proximal ACL repair with no significant difference in failure rate or PROs when accounting for the methodology of repair at a minimum two-year follow-up. It is important to note the lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials, the heterogeneity of included studies, and the lack of long-term data. Despite these limitations, the findings of the current analysis suggest that primary repair may be a useful treatment option for indicated candidates with proximal ACL ruptures. Further long-term and higher-quality comparative studies on ACL reconstruction are warranted.

Internal brace augmentation improves the biomechanical properties of trapeziometacarpal joint dorsoradial ligament repair

This study investigated whether dorsoradial ligament repair with internal brace augmentation provided more immediate stability in the trapeziometacarpal joint than dorsoradial ligament repair alone. Seven matched pairs of cadaveric hands were used. One specimen from each pair was assigned to the repair-only group and the other to the repair + internal brace augmentation group. Trapeziometacarpal joint range of motion and translation were quantified under different conditions for both groups: (1) intact, (2) transected dorsoradial ligament, and (3) repaired dorsoradial ligament or repaired dorsoradial ligament plus internal brace augmentation. Load-to-failure tests were performed after repair. Range of motion and translation were increased by dorsoradial ligament transection and were decreased by dorsoradial ligament repair; however, compared to the intact condition, the repair-only group demonstrated greater flexion/extension range, while the repair + internal brace group showed no significant difference in range of motion. Mean loads at 2- and 3-mm displacements were greater in the repair + internal brace group than in the repair-only group (18.0 ± 1.8 N vs. 10.8 ± 1.3 N for 2 mm displacement and 35.3 ± 3.7 N vs. 23.1 ± 2.9 N for 3 mm displacement, respectively). Internal brace augmentation improved the load-to-failure characteristics of dorsoradial ligament repair without compromising range of motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Reporting Bias in the Form of Positive Spin Is Highly Prevalent in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews on Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

PURPOSE

To analyze reporting bias in the form of spin present in systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the topic of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed throughout this study. Peer-reviewed systematic reviews were collected from 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus), and their abstracts were assessed for the 15 most common types of spin. Articles were excluded if they were not published in English, had no evidence, were retracted, were published without an abstract, did not have full text available, or included cadaveric or nonhuman subjects. Full text quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version 2). Fisher exact tests were used to examine associations between the different types of spin and other study characteristics such as AMSTAR 2 confidence rating, study design, and level of evidence.

RESULTS

Spin was present in the abstracts of 13 of 15 articles (86.7%). There were significant associations between PRISMA adherence and lower incidences of spin types 3, 6, and 8 (P = .029 for each). A critically low AMSTAR 2 confidence rating was significantly associated with an increased incidence of spin type 9 (P = .01), and a higher AMSTAR 2 score was significantly associated with decreased spin type 4 and type 5 (P = .039 and P = .048, respectively). A more recent year of publication was correlated with a lower incidence of spin type 14 (P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Spin is present in most systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding primary repair of the ACL, with two-thirds of abstracts spinning evidence in favor of ACL repair. Standardized guidelines including the PRISMA guidelines and the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool were negatively correlated with spin. More recently published articles were found to contain significantly less spin, as were articles published in journals with higher Clarivate Impact Factors and Scopus CiteScores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, systematic review of Level III through V studies.

Outcomes of multiligament knee injury treated with versus without internal brace suture augmentation

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative outcomes between Internal Brace (IB) and non-IB patients who underwent surgical management of multiple-ligament knee injuries (MLKI).

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical management of MLKI at two institutions between 2010 and 2020 were identified and offered participation in the study via the collection of postoperative functional outcomes for MLKI; Lysholm Knee score, Multiligament Quality of Life (ML-QOL), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing (CAT), Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Mobility instruments (MI). The postoperative outcomes and reoperation rates were compared between the IB group and non-IB group.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-six patients were analyzed; 89 were included in the IB group (31.5% female; age 35.6 ± 1.4 years), and 37 were included in the non-IB group (25.7% female; age 38.8 ± 2.4 years). Mean follow-up time of the entire cohort was 37.9 ± 4.7 months [IB: 21.8 + 1.63; non-IB: 76.4 ± 6.2, p < 0.001). The IB group achieved similar PROMIS CAT [PROMIS Pain (51.8 + 1.1 vs. 52.1 + 1.6, p = 0.8736), Physical Function (46.6 + 1.2 vs. 46.4 + 1.8, p = 0.9168), Mobility (46.0 + 1.0 vs. 43.7 + 1.6, p = 0.2185)], ML-QOL [ML-QOL Physical Impairment (36.6 + 2.5 vs. 43.5 ± 4.2, p = 0.1485), Emotional Impairment (42.5 + 2.9 vs. 48.6 ± 4.6, p = 0.2695), Activity Limitation (34.5 + 2.8 vs. 36.2 ± 4.3, p = 0.7384), Societal Involvement (39.1 + 3.0 vs. 41.7 + 4.2, p = 0.6434)] and Lysholm knee score (64.9 + 2.5 vs. 60.4 + 4.0, p = 0.3397) postoperatively compared the non-IB group, but the differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients with MLKI treated with versus without IB, outcomes and reoperation rates trended toward favoring IB, but the study was not sufficiently powered to reach statistical significance. Internal bracing could be useful in the management of MLKI. In the future, matched patient cohorts with more patients are warranted to further evaluate the clinical impact of the internal brace in MLKI.

Internal brace augmentation reconstruction versus standard anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled clinical trial study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common knee injuries in sports, and the gold standard for treating ACL rupture is tendon graft reconstruction. Internal brace technology is being used nowadays for ligament repair; however, more relevant in vivo clinical evidence is required for using internal brace technology in ACL reconstruction (ACLR). We conducted a randomised controlled trial to investigate the clinical efficacy of internal brace technology in ACLR.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised, parallel-controlled trial included patients with ACL rupture who underwent inpatient surgery at the Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Random number table method was used to assign the participants to either the test or the control group. The test group underwent ACLR using the internal brace technique, whereas the control group underwent standard ACLR. Uniform postoperative rehabilitation protocol was used for both the groups. Patient-reported outcomes included preoperative baseline and postoperative recovery at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome was International Knee Documentation Committee function from baseline (ACL rupture) to 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included (1) other patient outcome reporting metrics, Lysholm knee score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Visual Analog Scale; (2) the use of Kneelax3 knee stabiliser to assess knee stability; (3) occurrence of adverse events, such as graft refraction or symptomatic instability, postoperative infection and contralateral injury and (4) magnetic resonance images at 12 and 24 months after ACLR.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University on 26 October 2021. Data will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200057526.

Functional Rehabilitation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear in the Pediatric Population: A Comprehensive Review

Pediatric sports injuries are a growing concern due to increased youth participation in sports. Effective rehabilitation strategies are essential for ensuring optimal recovery, restoring knee function, and preventing long-term consequences. This research aims to explore and evaluate various functional rehabilitation approaches tailored to pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear injuries. Functional rehabilitation of ACL tears in pediatric sports injuries is an important area of research due to the unique considerations and challenges that arise when treating ACL injuries in young athletes. Over the last 20 years, there has been a well-documented uptick in ACL injuries among pediatric populations. This rise can be attributed to the growing involvement of the younger population in competitive sports, as well as heightened awareness regarding sports-linked injuries. This study highlights the importance of early surgical reconstruction in children to enable a quick return to sports and prevent long-term cartilage and meniscal damage resulting from instability. The use of physeal-sparing ACL reconstruction techniques, particularly hamstring autografts, is recommended for favorable clinical outcomes while minimizing growth disturbances. This study offers valuable insights for healthcare professionals and researchers, serving as a reference to guide optimal approaches in managing pediatric ACL injuries and achieving successful results in this field.

Favorable Patient-Reported, Clinical, and Functional Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Repair and InternalBrace Augmentation Compared With ACL Reconstruction and Healthy Controls

BACKGROUND

Recently, interest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) preservation and repair after proximal ACL tears has been resurrected. Although good clinical outcomes have been reported in the literature with adequate patient selection, to date detailed scientific evidence for the functional benefit of primary ACL repair with ligament augmentation is scarce.

PURPOSE

To compare patient-reported, clinical, and functional outcomes in patients 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation (ACL-IB) with age- and sex-matched patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) and with matched healthy controls.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

In total, 29 patients 2 years after ACL-IB, 27 sex- and age- matched patients 2 years after ACL-R (hamstring autografts), and 29 matched healthy controls were included. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D-5L, Tegner Activity Scale, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sports after Injury scale. Surgery time was recorded. For clinical outcomes, range of motion and thigh and shank circumference were measured, and passive anterior translation was determined using the Rolimeter. Isokinetic muscle strength was measured using a Biodex dynamometer. The limb symmetry index (operated/contralateral or nondominant/dominant × 100), side-to-side differences (operated - contralateral, nondominant - dominant), and hamstring-quadriceps ratios were calculated for functional parameters. Failure and reoperation rates were not compared.

RESULTS

Two years after surgery, patients treated with ACL-IB showed good to excellent patient-reported outcomes comparable with those of patients after ACL-R. Surgery time, including concomitant surgeries, was significantly shorter in the ACL-IB group (mean, 81 minutes) compared with the ACL-R group (mean, 97 minutes) (P = .024). Isokinetic muscle strength was comparable between patient groups without significant differences in extensor and flexor strength or in hamstring-quadriceps ratios.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that ACL-IB achieves comparable patient-reported, clinical, and functional outcomes with ACL-R at 2 years postoperatively and, after careful patient selection, should be considered as a valuable early treatment alternative for proximal ACL tears.

REGISTRATION

NCT04429165 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Clinical and Patient-Reported Functional Outcome of Semitendinosus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With FiberTape® InternalBrace™ All-Inside Technique: A Prospective Study

AIM

The purpose of this study is to report the early one-year clinical and patient-reported functional outcomes of semitendinosus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the FiberTape® InternalBrace™ all-inside technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patient-reported functional outcomes and clinical outcomes were analyzed prospectively following the treatment of 324 unilateral ACL rupture cases with the FiberTape® InternalBrace™ Technique. Patient-reported outcome measures (KOOS scores, WOMAC scores, VAS score, and IKDC score) and clinical examinations like pre-operative and post-operative pivot shift, Lachman test, and range of motion (ROM) were conducted. These tests and examinations were recorded for each patient before surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes like re-rupture, infection, synovitis, or limited range of motion were noted. The mean follow-up period was 18±4.5 months (range: 12-24 months).

RESULTS

Out of a total of 324 cases, 37 cases (11.4%) could not be followed up. 158 patients (55.1%) were male and 129 were female (44.9%). Preoperative mean KOOS pain value, KOOS symptoms, KOOS ADLs, KOOS sport and recreation, and KOOS quality of life were 77.05, 78.69, 84, 21, 89.7, and 57, respectively. All KOOS subsections increased significantly at one-year to 98.37, 99.09, 98.95, 99.02, and 99.30 (p<0.0001), respectively. Mean preoperative WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, and WOMAC function were 76.4, 65.2, and 74.1 and increased significantly at one-year to 94.5, 89.6, and 98.2 (p<0.0001), respectively. There was a significant decrease in VAS for pain from 2.93 before surgery to 0.12 (p<0.0001) at one year. The IKDC score significantly changed from a pre-treatment value of 50.9 to 96.2 (94.5-97.8) at a follow-up of one year. The Lysholm score at 12-months was significant at 95 (93.1-96.9), p<0.05. Post-operative Lachman test values decreased significantly, which meant decreased laxity, from 1.98 (1.89-2.07) pre-operative to 1.60 (1.57-1.62) p<0.05 at one-year post-operative. At one-year follow-up, 276 patients (96%) had fully recovered.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that the FiberTape® InternalBrace™ technique for ACL reconstruction provides orthopedic surgeons with an effective alternative technique to conventional methods of surgery and also reduces the overall time to recovery for patients, thereby allowing them to return to sports faster.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Ligament augmentation repair is broadly applied across different orthopaedic subspecialities: an ISAKOS international survey of orthopaedic surgeons

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate how ligament augmentation repair (LAR) techniques are currently used in different anatomic regions in orthopaedic sports medicine, and to identify the most common indications and limitations of LAR.

METHODS

We sent survey invitations to 4,000 members of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine society. The survey consisted of 37 questions total, with members only receiving some branching questions specific to their area of specialisation. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and the significance between groups was evaluated using chi-square tests of independence.

RESULTS

Of 515 surveys received, 502 were complete and included for the analysis (97% completion rate). 27% of respondents report from Europe, 26% South America, 23% Asia, 15% North America, 5.2% Oceania, and 3.4% Africa. 75% of all survey respondents report using LAR, most frequently using it for the anterior talofibular ligament ( 69%), acromioclavicular joint ( 58%), and the anterior cruciate ligament (51%). Surgeons in Asia report using LAR the most (80%), and surgeons in Africa the least (59%). LAR is most commonly indicated for additional stability (72%), poor tissue quality (54%), and more rapid return-to-play (47%). LAR users state their greatest limitation is cost (62%), while non-LAR users state their greatest reason not to use LAR is that patients do well without it (46%). We also find that the frequency of LAR use among surgeons may differ based on practice characteristics and training. For example, surgeons who treat athletes at the professional or Olympic level are significantly more likely to have a high annual use of LAR (20+ cases) compared to surgeons that treat only recreational athletes (45% and 25%, respectively, p ​= ​0.005).

CONCLUSION

LAR is broadly applied in orthopaedics but its rate of use is not homogeneous. Outcomes and perceived benefits vary depending on factors such as surgeon specialty and treatment population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Augmenting ACL Repair With Suture Tape Improves Knee Laxity: A Biomechanical Study

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair is an alternative to reconstruction; however, suture tape support may be necessary to achieve adequate outcomes.

Purposes

To investigate the influence of suture tape augmentation (STA) of proximal ACL repair on knee kinematics and to evaluate the effect of the 2 flexion angles of suture tape fixation.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Fourteen cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic testing system under anterior tibial (AT) load, simulated pivot-shift (PS) load, and internal rotation (IR) and external rotation loads. Kinematics and in situ tissue forces were evaluated. Knee states tested were (1) ACL intact, (2) ACL cut, (3) ACL repair with suture only, (4) ACL repair with STA fixed at 0° of knee flexion, and (5) ACL repair with STA fixed at 20° of knee flexion.

Results

ACL repair alone did not restore the intact ACL AT translation at 0°, 15°, 30°, or 60° of flexion. Adding suture tape to the repair significantly decreased AT translation at 0°, 15°, and 30° of knee flexion but not to the level of the intact ACL. With PS and IR loadings, only ACL repair with STA fixed at 20° of flexion was not significantly different from the intact state at all knee flexion angles. ACL suture repair had significantly lower in situ forces than the intact ACL with AT, PS, and IR loadings. With AT, PS, and IR loadings, adding suture tape significantly increased the in situ force in the repaired ACL at all knee flexion angles to become closer to that of the intact ACL state.

Conclusion

For complete proximal ACL tears, suture repair alone did not restore normal knee laxity or normal ACL in situ force. However, adding suture tape to augment the repair resulted in knee laxity closer to that of the intact ACL. STA with fixation at 20° of knee flexion was superior to fixation with the knee in full extension.

Clinical Relevance

The study findings suggest that ACL repair with STA fixed at 20° could be considered in the treatment of femoral sided ACL tears in the appropriate patient population.

Suture-tape augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomised controlled trial (STACLR)

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction aims to restore anteroposterior and rotatory stability to the knee following ACL injury. This requires the graft to withstand the forces applied during the process of ligamentisation and the rehabilitative period. We hypothesise that the use of suture tape augmentation of single bundle ACL reconstruction (ACLR) will reduce residual knee laxity and improve patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up. We will conduct a 1:1 parallel arm single-centre randomised controlled trial comparing suture tape augmented ACLR to standard ACLR technique.

METHODS

The study design will be a parallel arm 1:1 allocation ratio randomised controlled trial. Sixty-six patients aged 18 and over waitlisted for primary ACLR will be randomised. Patients requiring osteotomy and extra-articular tenodesis and who have had previous contralateral ACL rupture or repair of meniscal or cartilage pathology that modifies the post-operative rehabilitation will be excluded. The primary outcome measure will be the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation (measured on the GNRB arthrometer) at 24 months post-surgery. GNRB arthrometer measures will also be taken preoperatively, at 3 months and 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected online, including quality of life, activity and readiness to return to sport, complication rates (return to theatre, graft failure and rates of sterile effusion), examination findings and return to sport outcomes. Participants will be seen preoperatively, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-surgery. Participants and those taking arthrometer measures will be blinded to allocation.

DISCUSSION

This will be the first randomised trial to investigate the effect of suture-tape augmentation of ACLR on either objective or subjective outcome measures. The use of suture-tape augmentation in ACLR has been associated with promising biomechanical and animal-level studies, exhibiting equivalent complication profiles to the standard technique, with initial non-comparative clinical studies establishing possible areas of advantage for the technique. The successful completion of this trial will allow for an improved understanding of the in situ validity of tape augmentation whilst potentially providing a further platform for surgical stabilisation of the ACL graft.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12621001162808. Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1268-1487. Registered prospectively on 27 August 2021.

Clinical outcomes in dynamic intraligamentary stabilization technique for anterior cruciate ligament tear: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical outcome between dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in ACL tears.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched to identify published articles on clinical studies comparing DIS versus ACL reconstruction. The results of the eligible studies were analyzed in terms of anteroposterior knee laxity translation (ΔATT) between the injured and contralateral knees, and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm score, Tegner score, and ipsilateral ACL failure, implant removal, and ACL revision.

RESULTS

Five clinical studies including 429 patients with ACL tears met the inclusion criteria. DIS showed statistically comparable outcomes of ΔATT (P = .12), IKDC (P = .38), Tegner (P = .82), ACL failure (P = .50), ACL revision (P = .29) with ACL reconstruction. A significantly higher rate of implant removal (odds ratio for DIS vs ACL reconstruction, 7.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.72-22.00; P = .0001) but statistically higher Lysholm score (mean difference between DIS and ACL reconstruction, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.24-2.93; P = .02) were found in DIS group.

CONCLUSION

Five clinical studies including 429 patients with ACL tears met the inclusion criteria. DIS showed statistically comparable outcomes of ΔATT (P = .12), IKDC (P = .38), Tegner (P = .82), ACL failure (P = .50), ACL revision (P = .29) with ACL reconstruction. A significantly higher rate of implant removal (odds ratio for DIS vs ACL reconstruction, 7.73; 95% CI, 2.72-22.00; P = .0001) but statistically higher Lysholm score (mean difference between DIS and ACL reconstruction, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.24-2.93; P = .02) were found in DIS group.

Clinical Research Progress of Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation Technique in Knee Ligament Injury Repair and Reconstruction: A Narrative Review

Knee ligament injuries are most common in sports injuries. In general, ligament repair or reconstruction is necessary to restore the stability of the knee joint and prevent secondary injuries. Despite advances in ligament repair and reconstruction techniques, a number of patients still experience re-rupture of the graft and suboptimal recovery of motor function. Since Dr. Mackay's introduction of the internal brace technique, there has been continuous research in recent years using the internal brace ligament augmentation technique for knee ligament repair or reconstruction, particularly in the repair or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. This technique focuses on increasing the strength of autologous or allograft tendon grafts through the use of braided ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene suture tapes to facilitate postoperative rehabilitation and avoid re-rupture or failure. The purpose of this review is to present detailed research progress in the internal brace ligament enhancement technique of knee ligament injury repair as well as the reconstruction from biomechanical and histological research and clinical studies and to comprehensively assess the value of the application of this technique.

Failure Rates After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation in an Active-Duty Military Population

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair had previously been considered the standard of care for a ruptured ACL; however, ACL reconstruction has became the standard of care because of poor midterm outcomes after ACL repair. Recently, studies have suggested that the treatment paradigm should shift back to ACL repair.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of ACL repair augmented with suture tape in a high-demand military population. We hypothesized that for proximal ACL avulsions, ACL repair with suture tape augmentation would lead to acceptable failure rates, satisfactory knee stability, excellent functional outcomes, and high rates of return to preinjury activity levels.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

Patients who were treated with ACL repair by a single surgeon between March 2017 and June 2019 and who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included. Intraoperatively, all patients first underwent an arthroscopic examination. If an ACL avulsion of the proximal insertion with adequate remaining tissue was visualized, then ACL repair was performed. The primary outcome assessed was ACL repair failure, defined as reruptures or clinical instability requiring revision to ACL reconstruction. Analysis of the risk factors for ACL repair failure was conducted, with age at surgery, sex, body mass index, level of competition, and tobacco use evaluated.

Results

Included were 46 patients (32 male and 14 female; mean age, 28.3 ± 8.4 years) who underwent ACL repair with suture tape augmentation. There were 12 cases of failure (26.1%; 8 male and 4 female). The mean time from injury to surgery in the failure group was 164.1 ± 59.4 days compared to 107.3 ± 98.0 days in the nonfailure group (P = .02). According to multivariate regression analysis, patients aged ≤17 and ≥35 years, elite/competitive/operational patients, and current smokers had a higher chance of ACL repair failure. The mean time to pass a military physical fitness test was 5.0 months. There were no complications other than ACL repair failure.

Conclusion

Primary arthroscopic ACL repair with suture tape augmentation resulted in unacceptably high failure rates at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up in a highly active military population. Age ≤17 and ≥35 years, elite level of competition, time from injury to surgery, and active tobacco use were independent risk factors for ACL repair failure.

Suture Augmentation in Orthopaedic Surgery Offers Improved Time-Zero Biomechanics and Promising Short-Term Clinical Outcomes

Ligament and tendon ruptures have historically been addressed with varying techniques involving either repair or reconstruction. More recently, the potential biomechanical benefits of suture augmentation (SA), also known as internal brace, have attracted substantial attention and helped renew interest in ligament repair surgery. We evaluated the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of SA-based techniques in the following sports medicine procedures: medial ulnar collateral ligament repair of the elbow, thumb collateral ligament repair, anterior cruciate ligament repair, Achilles' tendon repair, and deltoid ligament repair. Published data on the use of SA to augment repairs of the ulnar collateral ligament, thumb collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, Achilles' tendon, and deltoid ligament repair demonstrates improved time-zero biomechanical and promising short to mid-term clinical outcomes. However, surgeons must be wary of potential complications, including joint over-constraint, nerve paresthesia, and infection.

Biomechanical Effect of Differential Tensioning on Suture-Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow

BACKGROUND

Medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) reconstructions are becoming increasingly prevalent among the overhand throwing population. Suture tape augmentation has the potential to provide biomechanical advantages over standard docking reconstruction. However, the optimal tensioning of the suture augmentation technique has not yet been evaluated.

PURPOSE

To compare the subfailure biomechanical performance and graft strain of a standard docking mUCL reconstruction to an mUCL reconstruction using suture tape augmentation tensioned with 1 mm or 3 mm of laxity.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 18 cadaveric elbows were dissected to the mUCL anterior band and biomechanically assessed via a valgus torque protocol to failure. Elbows were randomly assigned to be reconstructed via (1) a standard docking technique, (2) a suture-augmented reconstruction with 1-mm laxity, or (3) a suture-augmented reconstruction with 3-mm laxity. Reconstructed elbows were then subjected to the same loading protocol. Subfailure mechanical properties, failure mode, and mUCL/palmaris strain were assessed.

RESULTS

All reconstruction groups had decreased rotational stiffness, torque at 5° of angular rotation, and resilience compared with matched native controls. There were no differences in transition torque between groups. The failure mode of suture-augmented specimens was most often due to bone tunnel failure or reaching the maximum allowable angular displacement. In native controls or docking reconstructions, the primary failure mechanism was in the ligament or graft midsubstance. There were no significant differences in strain on the reconstructed or suture-augmented groups at any laxity compared with native controls.

CONCLUSION

Suture augmentation results in similar subfailure joint biomechanical properties as the standard docking reconstruction procedure at both laxity levels in a cadaveric model. There are improvements in the failure mode of suture-augmented specimens compared with standard docking. Graft strain may be modestly reduced in the 1-mm laxity group compared with other reconstruction groups.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Suture augmentation at both 1-mm and 3-mm laxity appears to offer similar advantages in subfailure biomechanics to standard docking reconstruction of the mUCL, with some improvements associated with failure mode. Strain data suggest a potential avoidance of graft stress shielding when tensioning the suture augmentation to 3-mm laxity, which is not as apparent with 1-mm laxity.

Management after acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), part 2: management of the ACL-injured patient

PURPOSE

The aim of this consensus project was to create a treatment algorithm for the management of the ACL-injured patient which can serve as an aid in a shared decision-making process.

METHODS

For this consensus process, a steering and a rating group were formed. In an initial face-to-face meeting, the steering group, together with the expert group, formed various key topic complexes for which various questions were formulated. For each key topic, a structured literature search was performed by the steering group. The results of the literature review were sent to the rating group with the option to give anonymous comments until a final consensus voting was performed. Sufficient consensus was defined as 80% agreement.

RESULTS

During this consensus process, 15 key questions were identified. The literature search for each key question resulted in 24 final statements. Of these 24 final statements, all achieved consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus process has shown that ACL rupture is a complex injury, and the outcome depends to a large extent on the frequently concomitant injuries (meniscus and/or cartilage damage). These additional injuries as well as various patient-specific factors should play a role in the treatment decision. The present treatment algorithm represents a decision aid within the framework of a shared decision-making process for the ACL-injured patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Treatment of Knee Dislocation With Primary Repair and Suture Augmentation: A Viable Solution

Background:

Different surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of knee dislocation (KD). Nonoperative approaches are frequently combined with surgical reconstruction using auto- or allograft.

Purpose:

To evaluate the midterm results of primary surgical repair and suture augmentation to treat KD.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A total of 22 patients (5 women, 17 men; mean age, 45 ± 15 years) with KD were evaluated at a mean of 49 ± 16 months after surgical treatment that included primary repair and suture augmentation. Magnetic resonance imaging, stress radiographs, and outcome scores were obtained at the follow-up. Clinical examination including hop tests and force measurements for flexion and extension was performed.

Results:

The mean difference in pre- to postinjury Tegner scores was –2 ± 1. The outcome scores showed mean values of 84 ± 15 (Lysholm), 73 ± 15 (International Knee Documentation Committee) and 65 ± 25 (Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury scale). Compared with the uninjured knee, the range of motion of the injured knee was reduced by 21° ± 12°. Twelve patients felt fit enough to perform hop tests and showed a mean deficit of 7% ± 17%° compared with the uninjured leg. The mean force deficit was 19% ± 18% for extension and 8% ± 16% for flexion. Stress radiographs revealed an 11 ± 7–mm higher anteroposterior translation on the injured side. Four patients had secondary ligament reconstructions due to persistent instability and 7 underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis due to stiffness. A significant increase of osteoarthritis was found for the medial, lateral, and patellofemoral compartments (P = .007, .004, and .006, respectively).

Conclusion:

Primary repair and suture augmentation of KD led to satisfactory clinical midterm results despite persistent radiological instability and a significant increase in osteoarthritis. This technique allows the return to activities of daily living without subjective instability in most nonathletic patients. Secondary ligament reconstructions should be performed if relevant instability persists to decrease the risk of secondary meniscal and cartilage damage.

The Chinese knotting technique assist anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for aggressive rehabilitation

Aggressive rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may result in better clinical outcomes and fewer complications such as knee stiffness and weakness. We explored the effect of the Chinese knotting technique (CKT) for aggressive rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Ninety-one anatomical ACL reconstruction cases from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were operated by the same senior physician and his team. According to the reconstruction with or without CKT, the patients were divided into 2 groups. Both groups received aggressive rehabilitation. The follow-up time of 91 patients was more than 2 years. In total, 43 out of the 91 patients were in the CKT group, and 48 were in the routine group. The knee joint kinematics recorded by Opti_Knee revealed no significant difference among the CKT group, the routine group, and healthy adults at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the operation, respectively. The internal and external rotation angle and the anteroposterior displacement at 3 and 6 months after the operation in the CKT group were smaller than in the routine group and were similar to that of the healthy adults. There was no significant difference in flexion and extension angle, varus or valgus angle, proximal-distal displacement, or the internal or external displacement between the 2 groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in 6 degrees of freedom of the knee between the 2 groups at 12 and 24 months after the operation, respectively, which was similar to healthy adults. Compared to the routine group, the International Knee Documentation Committee scores were significantly higher in the CKT group at the 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, but no difference was observed at 24 months (P = .749). The Lysholm score was significantly higher in the CKT group at the 3 and 6 months postoperatively, while there was no difference at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In short-term observation, the ACL reconstruction with CKT, which can sustain aggressive rehabilitation and prevent the loosening of ACL graft, can lead to better clinical outcomes and kinematics recovery of the knee compared to routine technique.

Rehabilitation and functional outcomes in internally braced and standard ACL reconstructions

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, with and without internal bracing, at 1-3, 4-7, and 8-12 months of postoperative physical therapy. Previous studies show that ACL reconstruction with internal bracing allows earlier and more aggressive rehabilitation. Therefore, it was hypothesized that patients with internal bracing would display superior surgical recovery compared to ACL reconstruction alone after adjusting for length of physical therapy.1, 2, 3.

Methods

Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and had a minimum two-year follow-up were included. Demographics including age, gender, use of internal bracing, and pre-operative level of activity were collected. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using KOOS scores.

Results

46 patients underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2013 and December 2015. The mean age was 31.53 ± 8.37 years. Patients who received ACL reconstruction with internal bracing reported similar improvement in KOOS scores (mean = 42.82 ± 15.44; median = 46.39 [34.52-51.80]) compared to ACL reconstruction alone (mean = 38.18 ± 19.91; median = 40.17 [29.49-53.90]) (p = 0.475). Patients who received ACL reconstruction with internal bracing reported comparable improvement to ACL reconstruction alone at 0-3 months (Internal bracing: mean = 35.39 ± 15.26, median = 40.45 [26.49-47.73]; No internal bracing: mean = 42.51 ± 12.33, median = 39.32 [35.69-52.94], p = 0.4113), 4-7 months (Internal bracing: 41.96 ± 14.49, 45.55 [33.94-52.68]; No internal bracing: 30.64 ± 32.29, 41.65 [26.17-46.12], p = 0.7491) and 8+ months groups (Internal bracing: 63.36 ± 13.06, 63.36 [58.74-67.98]; No internal bracing: 47.05 ± 10.14, 47.05 [43.46-50.63]) (p = 0.6985).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates no statistical difference in functional outcome scores when comparing patients with internally braced ACL reconstruction compared to standard reconstruction. Therefore, the increased structural support provided by use of internal bracing in ACL reconstruction does not afford to quicker improvement in patient-reported recovery.

Failure of primary ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization may result in a high risk of two-stage ACL reconstruction: a case series of ten patients

PURPOSE

Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization (DIS) is a technique for the repair of acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential challenges of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) following failure of DIS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with failure of primary ACL repair performed with DIS was undertaken. Failure was defined as abnormal knee laxity (positive Lachman and/or pivot shift) and/or severely restricted range of motion. Medical and surgical records were reviewed and preoperative standard anteroposterior and lateral X-rays were assessed.

RESULTS

Between July 2015 and May 2022, 10 patients (3 males, 7 females, median age 28 years, range 18-52 years) with failure of DIS were referred to and surgically treated at a single centre. In four patients, single-stage ACLR was performed following the removal of the tibial monoblock. In six patients, arthrofibrosis and excessive tibial tunnel enlargement following the removal of the monoblock prevented single-stage ACLR. These patients underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis and tibial tunnel bone grafting as a first-stage revision procedure.

CONCLUSION

In the present case series, single-stage ACLR was performed in only four (40%) of ten patients following failure of ACL repair with DIS. Arthrofibrosis and excessive tibial tunnel enlargement following the removal of the monoblock prevented single-stage ACLR in six (60%) patients. It is important for clinicians to inform patients that, in the event of failure of ACL repair with DIS, they may run a high risk of undergoing two-stage ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case Series.

Suture Tape Augmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Increases Biomechanical Stability: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical, Animal, and Clinical Studies

PURPOSE

To (1) assess the available literature reporting on suture tape augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and (2) determine what evidence exists to support and oppose the technique in clinical practice.

METHODS

Five databases were systematically searched on November 24, 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Technical, animal, biomechanical, and clinical studies were included. Quality appraisal was conducted according to study type. Data were extracted and reported in tabular and narrative form according to the study design.

RESULTS

In total, 1276 studies were appraised, with 22 studies including 6 biomechanical, 3 animal, 10 technical, and 3 clinical studies. Biomechanical studies reported tape-augmented grafts to withstand 12.2% to 73.0% greater load to failure and 17.0% to 60.2% reduced elongation compared with standard ACL reconstruction. Evidence of load sharing started at 200 N (7-mm graft) and 300 N (9-mm graft), with suture tape augments taking 31% and 20% of the final load (400 N), respectively, in one study. Among animal studies, no significant differences in complications, rates of ligamentization, histologic findings, or evidence of stress shielding were reported. Technical studies differed primarily in the method of fixation of the proximal end of the tape. Clinically, patient-reported outcome measures were mixed among significant and nonsignificant improvements in International Knee Documentation Committee scores and return to sport among tape-augmented groups, with no difference in complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanically, suture tape augmentation of ACL reconstruction increased the strength of the graft complex and reduced elongation, with early evidence of the "safety belt" effect with load-sharing properties at greater loads established. In animal studies, graft maturation and 4-zone bone healing, and equivalent rates of intra-articular complications were detected in ACL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation. In clinical studies, patient-reported outcomes were mixed between improved and equivalent outcomes with and without suture tape augmentation, whereas graft failure was not adequately powered to be assessed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Suture tape augmentation of ACL reconstruction offers a low-cost method of improving initial biomechanical stability of the ACL graft. Animal and clinical data suggest the complication profile associated with synthetic grafts may not be apparent in tape augmentation. Independent suture tape augmentation may be considered with aims to increase the initial stability of the native ACL graft.

Cellular Augmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery Is Not Currently Evidence Based: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of clinical outcome studies exploring cellular augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, including stem cell techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the Cochrane, PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases from 2000 to 2019. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that reported on ACL surgery augmented with stem cells or cellular therapy and patient-reported outcome measures or graft healing. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials, and nonrandomized trials were assessed using the Methodological Items for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Methodologic assessment was performed according to the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.

RESULTS

Four studies were found: 2 randomized clinical trials, 1 cohort study with a matched historical control group, and 1 case series. The mean Modified Coleman Methodology Score in these studies was 59, and there was a low risk of bias in 1 study. One study reported outcomes of augmented ACL repair, and 3 studies reported the results of augmented ACL reconstruction. Cellular therapies varied and included concentrated bone marrow aspirate, collagenase/centrifuge processed adipose, and marrow stimulation combined with platelet-rich plasma, as well as cells cultured from allograft bone marrow aspirate. The concentrated bone marrow aspirate and adipose tissue study results did not support their use. The marrow stimulation technique combined with repair led to promising clinical results. The use of allograft cultured cells improved patient-reported outcomes and postoperative radiographic findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation of ACL surgery with cellular therapy is not supported by clinical evidence at this time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Tape Internal Brace Reinforcement of Soft Tissue Allografts for ACL Reconstruction Using a Porcine Model

Background:

Internal bracing of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery is a newer concept gaining popularity.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

To assess the biomechanical performance of soft tissue ACL reconstruction allografts reinforced with suture tape. It was hypothesized that load to failure would increase and cyclic displacement would decrease at time zero in the constructs reinforced with internal brace suture tape compared with those without suture tape augmentation.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

We performed ACL reconstruction on porcine knees using bovine extensor tendon soft tissue allografts: 10 knees without (control) and 10 knees with (reinforced) suture tape reinforcement. An all-inside reconstruction technique was utilized with retrograde tunnel creation. An adjustable-loop device was used for femoral and tibial fixation of all grafts. The suture tape was placed through the tension loop in the femoral fixation construct and independently fixed in the tibia with an interference screw anchor. For each specimen, the authors recorded ultimate load, yield load, stiffness, cyclic displacement, and mode of failure. Outcomes between groups were compared using the Student t test.

Results:

There was a 33% decrease in mean cyclic displacement in the specimens with reinforced grafts (reinforced vs control: 3.9 ± 0.7 vs 5.8 ± 1.5 mm; P = .001). The reinforced grafts also had a 22% higher mean ultimate load (921 ± 180 vs 717 ± 122 N; P = .008) and a 25% higher mean yield load (808 ± 201 vs 602 ± 155 N; P = .020). There was no significant difference in stiffness between the reinforced versus nonreinforced grafts (136 ± 16 vs 132 ± 18 N/mm; P = .617). Three of the 10 control specimens failed at the graft, compared with 1 of 10 reinforced grafts. All other constructs in both groups failed at the tibial fixation site.

Conclusion:

Suture tape reinforcement of soft tissue grafts significantly decreased cyclic displacement while significantly increasing ultimate and yield loads without increasing graft construct stiffness during biomechanical testing at time zero in a porcine animal model.

Clinical Relevance:

The improved biomechanical performance of suture tape–reinforced graft constructs could allow patients to participate in earlier advancement of aggressive rehabilitation and potentially reduce failure rates as graft remodeling progresses.

Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair and autograft ACL reconstruction for ACL ruptures.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies from 1 January 1990 to 21 March 2022. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the enrolled studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

Ten studies with mean follow-up periods from 12 to 36 months were included. For 638 patients with ACL ruptures, arthroscopic ACL repair showed statistically comparable outcomes of failure (p = 0.18), complications (p = 0.29), reoperation other than revision (p = 0.78), Lysholm score (p = 0.78), Tegner score (p = 0.70), and satisfaction (p = 0.45) when compared with autograft ACL reconstruction. A significantly higher rate of hardware removal (p = 0.0008) but greater International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (p = 0.009) were found in the ACL repair group. The heterogeneity of the side-to-side difference of anterior tibial translation (ΔATT) was high (I 2 = 80%). After the sensitivity analysis, the I 2 decreased dramatically (I 2 = 32%), and the knees with ACL repair showed significantly greater ΔATT (P = 0.04).

Conclusion

For proximal ACL ruptures, arthroscopic ACL repair showed similar clinical outcomes, and even better functional performance when compared to autograft ACL reconstruction. ACL repair has a higher rate of hardware removal, and might be related to greater asymptomatic knee laxity. More high-quality prospective trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Paediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injuries: Current Concepts Review

BACKGROUND

Over the past two decades, there has been a documented increase in paediatric ACL injuries because of a rise in younger age sports participation at the competitive level, awareness about sports-related injuries, and advanced imaging modalities.

METHODS

A PubMed electronic database search was done, which revealed 1366 hits over the last five years (2016 - 2020). Finally, 37 articles that contributed to new findings were included. This review was conducted based on predefined research questions.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Early surgical reconstruction is recommended in children due to the increasing demand for early return to sports and to prevent the instability that can lead to progressive cartilage and meniscal damage. With the evolution of several "physeal sparing" ACL reconstruction (ACLR) techniques, a favorable clinical outcome with less growth disturbance is achievable. Although different autograft options are available, hamstring autografts are most commonly preferred. A specific pattern of a bone bruise not extending into the metaphysis, and lateral meniscus tears are the most common associated injuries. Following paediatric ACLR, complications like graft rupture and contralateral ACL injuries are two to three folds higher than with adult ACLR. Unprepared early return to sports is one of the reasons for increased complication rates in children; thus, clearance criteria for return to sports need to be standardized, and early return to sports (< 9 months post ACLR) should be avoided. Neuromuscular training protocols are recommended to minimize complications like graft ruptures.

Minimizing the risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes. A narrative review of the current evidence

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most common sport-related injuries and the request for ACL reconstructions is increasing nowadays. Unfortunately, ACL graft failures are reported in up to 34.2% in athletes, representing a traumatic and career-threatening event. It can be convenient to understand the various risk factors for ACL failure, in order to properly inform the patients about the expected outcomes and to minimize the chance of poor results. In literature, a multitude of studies have been performed on the failure risks after ACL reconstruction, but the huge amount of data may generate much confusion.The aim of this review is to resume the data collected from literature on the risk of graft failure after ACL reconstruction in athletes, focusing on the following three key points: individuate the predisposing factors to ACL reconstruction failure, analyze surgical aspects which may have significant impact on outcomes, highlight the current criteria regarding safe return to sport after ACL reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures has re-emerged as a treatment option for proximal tears, with internal brace augmentation often utilised. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current evidence presenting outcomes of ACL repair with internal bracing to assess the safety and efficacy of this technique.

METHODS

All studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears, augmented with internal bracing from 2014-2021 were included. Primary outcome was failure rate and secondary outcomes were subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective assessment of anteroposterior knee laxity.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included, consisting of 347 patients, mean age 32.5 years, mean minimum follow up 2 years. There were 36 failures (10.4%, CI 7.4% - 14.1%). PROMs reporting was variable across studies. KOOS, Lysholm and IKDC scores were most frequently used with mean scores > 87%. The mean Tegner and Marx scores at follow-up were 6.1 and 7.8 respectively. The mean side to side difference measured for anteroposterior knee laxity was 1.2mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review with meta-analysis shows that ACL repair with internal bracing is a safe technique for treatment of proximal ruptures, with a failure rate of 10.4%. Subjective scores and clinical laxity testing also revealed satisfactory results. This suggests that ACL repair with internal bracing should be considered as an alternative to ACL reconstruction for acute proximal tears, with the potential benefits of retained native tissue and proprioception, as well as negating the need for graft harvest.

RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional-biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls-experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Despite good clinical outcomes reported in the literature, to date, scientific evidence for the functional and biomechanical benefit of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with augmentation is scarce. We present an experimental protocol for a detailed multimodal (clinical, socioeconomic, functional and biomechanical) comparative study in patients after primary ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation, patients after ACL reconstruction and healthy controls.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this non-randomised single-centre comparative study with prospective data collection with three arms (patients 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation; patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts; and healthy controls), 30 participants per study arm will be included. The study is designed as non-inferiority study with three arms. Required sample size was estimated based on data reported in the literature on muscle strength, proprioception and balance parameters, resulting in at least 28 participants per group. Outcome parameters include patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D-5L, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee and ACL-Return to Sports Injury Scale), socio-economic parameters, anterior tibial translation, range of motion and functional-biomechanical data of the lower extremities. Functional-biomechanical parameters include proprioception, isokinetic muscle strength, single-leg balance, walking, running and single-leg hops with additional lower extremity 3D joint kinematics and kinetics and muscle activity. These parameters will be compared between limbs in patients, between groups and to the current literature.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Ethical approval was obtained by the regional ethics board (Ethics Committee Northwest Switzerland EKNZ 2020-00551), and the study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov.Trial registration numberNCT04429165.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using cortical or anchor fixation with suture tape augmentation vs ACL reconstruction: A comparative biomechanical analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to compare knee kinematics in a cadaveric model of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using an adjustable-loop femoral cortical suspensory (AL-CSF) or independent bundle suture anchor fixation (IB-SAF) with suture tape augmentation to a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty-seven cadaveric knees were randomly assigned to one of three surgical techniques: (1) ACL repair using the AL-CSF technique with suture tape augmentation, (2) ACL repair using the IB-SAF technique with suture tape augmentation, (3) ACL reconstruction using a BPTB autograft. Each specimen underwent three conditions according to the state of the ACL (native, proximal transection, repair/reconstruction) with each condition tested at four different angles of knee flexion (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation (ITR) were evaluated using 3-dimensional motion tracking software.

RESULTS

ACL transection resulted in a significant increase in ATT and ITR when compared to the native state (P < 0.001, respectively). ACL repair with the AL-CSF or IB-SAF technique as well as BPTB reconstruction restored native ATT and ITR at all tested angles of knee flexion, while showing significantly less ATT at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° as well as significantly less ITR at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion when compared to the ACL-deficient state. There were no significant differences in ATT and ITR between the three techniques utilized.

CONCLUSION

ACL repair using the AL-CSF or IB-SAF technique with suture tape augmentation as well as BPTB ACL reconstruction each restored native anteroposterior and rotational laxity, without significant differences in knee kinematics between the three techniques utilized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Controlled Laboratory Study.

Treatment of Combined Injuries to the ACL and the MCL Complex: A Consensus Statement of the Ligament Injury Committee of the German Knee Society (DKG)

Background:

Different indications and treatment options for combined injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament complex (MCL) are not clearly defined.

Purpose:

To perform a modified Delphi process with the Committee for Ligament Injuries of the German Knee Society (DKG) in order to structure and optimize the process of treating a combined injury to the ACL and MCL.

Study Design:

Consensus statement.

Methods:

Scientific questions and answers were created based on a comprehensive literature review using the central registers for controlled studies of Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane including the terms medial collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, MCL, ACL, and outcome used in various combinations. The obtained statements passed 3 cycles of a modified Delphi process during which each was readjusted and rated according to the available evidence (grades A-E) by the members of the DKG Ligament Injuries Committee and its registered guests.

Results:

The majority of answers, including several questions with >1 graded answer, were evaluated as grade E (n = 16) or C (n = 10), indicating that a low level of scientific evidence was available for most of the answers. Only 5 answers were graded better than C: 3 answers with a grade of A and 2 answers with a grade of B. Only 1 answer was evaluated as grade D. An agreement of >80% (range, 83%-100%) among committee members was achieved for all statements.

Conclusion:

The results of this modified Delphi process offer a guideline for standardized patient care in cases of combined injuries to the ACL and MCL.

Suture Tape Augmentation Improves the Biomechanical Performance of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the time-zero biomechanical properties (stiffness, displacement, and load at failure) of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with and without suture tape augmentation as a means to determine the potential clinical benefit of this technique.

METHODS

Eight juvenile porcine knees underwent ACL reconstruction with a human cadaveric BTB graft (control). These were compared to 8 juvenile porcine knees that underwent ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft augmented with suture tape. All knees underwent biomechanical testing utilizing a dynamic tensile testing machine. Cyclic loading between 50-250N was performed for 500 cycles at 1 Hz to simulate in vivo ACL loads during the early rehabilitation phase. The grafts were displaced during load-at-failure tensile testing at 20 mm/min. Differences in graft displacement, stiffness, and load at failure for the control and suture tape augmented groups were compared with the Student t-test with a significance level of P < .05.

RESULTS

There was no difference in graft displacement between the 2 groups. A 104% higher postcyclic stiffness was noted in the augmented group compared to the controls (augmentation: 261 ± 76 N/mm versus control 128 ± 28 N/mm, P = .002). The mean ultimate load at failure was 57% higher in the augmented group compared to controls (744 ± 219 N vs postcyclic 473 ± 169 N, respectively [P = .015]). There was no difference in mode of failure between the control knees and those augmented with suture tape, with approximately half failing from pull off of the tendon from the bone plug and half with pull out of the bone plug from the tunnel.

CONCLUSION

Independent suture tape augmentation of a BTB ACL reconstruction grafts was associated with a 104% increase in graft stiffness and a 57% increase in load at failure compared to nonaugmented BTB grafts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In vivo suture tape augmentation of a BTB ACL reconstruction increases graft construct strength and stiffness, which may reduce graft failure in the clinical setting.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstrings Augmented With the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System Versus Hamstrings Alone: A Comparative Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have reported the return-to-sports (RTS) rate in patients after augmentation of autologous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS).

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent ACLR with single-bundle 4-strand hamstring autograft either without augmentation (HA-ACLR group) or with LARS augmentation (AUG-ACLR group). It was hypothesized that clinical outcomes and RTS rates would be better in the AUG-ACLR group at the 1-year follow-up, with similar outcomes in both cohorts by 2 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACLR between April 2014 and December 2017 were included in the current comparative study if they were skeletally mature and had 1- and 2-year follow-up outcomes; patients with concomitant meniscal surgery were also included. Included were 66 patients with AUG-ACLR (mean age, 26.8 years; 67% male) and 130 patients with HA-ACLR (mean age, 27.5 years; 61% male). Subjective outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm scale, Tegner activity scale, and the Noyes sports activity rating scale. Objective measures included knee laxity, maximal isokinetic knee flexion and extension strength, and the results of 4 functional hop tests.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the study groups in age, sex distribution, body mass index, time to surgery, or number of concurrent meniscal surgeries. At the 1-year follow-up, the AUG-ACLR group had a significantly higher Tegner score (P = .001) and rates of RTS (P = .029) and return to preinjury level of sport (P = .003) compared with the HA-ACLR group. At the 2-year follow-up, there were no differences in these measures between groups. There were no between-group differences in other subjective outcomes, knee laxity, or strength and hop test results at either postoperative time point. There were also no differences in rerupture rates or other complications between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with AUG-ACLR had higher 1-year postoperative Tegner scores and rates of RTS and preoperative sport level compared with the HA-ACLR group. The 2-year rerupture rate for the AUG-ACLR group was low, and no intra-articular inflammatory complications were noted.

A Prospective Observational Study on Short-Term Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair of Proximal Tears Using Knotless Single Suture Anchor Technique

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical outcomes in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) proximal tears undergoing arthroscopic primary repair with knotless single suture anchor technique.

METHODS

The first twenty-two consecutive patients with proximal ACL tears (Sherman types I and II and high-grade partial tears) treated with arthroscopic primary repair with single suture anchor technique were evaluated until 6 months post-operatively. Patients were evaluated with validated functional outcome measures (IKDC and Lysholm scores) and clinical tests for ACL stability.

RESULTS

At 6-month follow-up, 91% of patients (n = 20) achieved excellent outcome measures for IKDC and Lysholm scores and had complete stability of the ACL to clinical testing. Two patients with poor outcomes at six weeks; one with subjective instability and the other underwent revision surgery represented a failure rate of 9%. The median Lysholm score was 96 (IQ range, 96-100) and median IKDC subjective score was 87.40 (IQ range, 78.20-88.50) at 6-month follow-up. The improvement in Lysholm and IKDC scores over a period of six months post-operatively was statistically significant when compared to preoperative scores (p ≪ 0.0001). Maximum improvement in clinical outcomes is achieved in the first 6 weeks post-surgery with a slower increase thereafter, a time interval which may be considered as a figurative yield point for future work in this field.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic ACL primary repair with knotless single suture anchor technique provides excellent short-term clinical outcomes in a carefully selected subset of patients with proximal ACL tears. More powered and longer duration studies are needed to understand longer term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Prognostic Factors for Patient-Reported Outcomes at 32 to 37 Years After Surgical or Nonsurgical Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Background:

Knowledge to inform the identification of individuals with a poor long-term prognosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is limited. Identifying prognostic factors for long-term outcomes after ACL injury may inform targeted interventions to improve outcomes for those with a poor long-term prognosis.

Purpose:

To determine whether ACL treatment (early augmented or nonaugmented ACL repair plus rehabilitation, rehabilitation alone, or rehabilitation plus delayed ACL reconstruction [ACLR]) and 4-year measures (quadriceps and hamstrings strength, single-leg hop, knee laxity, flexion and extension deficit, self-reported knee function, activity level) are prognostic factors for patient-reported outcomes at 32 to 37 years after acute ACL injury.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

A total of 251 patients aged 15 to 40 years with acute ACL rupture between 1980 and 1985 were allocated to early ACL repair (augmented or nonaugmented) plus rehabilitation or to rehabilitation alone, based on birth year. One hundred ninety of 234 completed 32- to 37-year follow-up questionnaires (response rate, 81%); 18 people were excluded, resulting in 172 patients available for analysis (mean age, 59 ± 6 years; 28% female). Potential prognostic factors assessed 4 years after ACL injury were ACL treatment (early ACL repair, rehabilitation alone, or delayed ACLR), isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength, single-leg hop performance, knee flexion and extension deficit, knee laxity, Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm score. Outcomes included Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) measure. Linear regression adjusted for age, sex, baseline meniscal injury, and contralateral ACL injury was used to assess potential prognostic factors for 32- to 37-year outcomes. Multiple imputation accounted for missing data.

Results:

A fair/poor Lysholm score (vs excellent/good) at 4 years was a prognostic factor for worse KOOS Pain (adjusted regression coefficient, −12 [95% confidence interval (CI), −19 to −4]), KOOS Symptoms (−15 [95% CI, −23 to −7]), KOOS Sport and Recreation (−19 [95% CI, −31 to −8]), and ACL QOL (−9 [95% CI, −18 to −1]) scores. A 4-year single-leg hop limb symmetry index <90% was a prognostic factor for worse KOOS Pain (adjusted regression coefficient, −9 [95% CI, −17 to −1]) and ACL QOL (−13 [95% CI, −22 to −3]) scores at long-term follow-up. A lower activity level, delayed ACLR, and increased knee laxity were prognostic factors in the crude analysis. Rehabilitation alone versus early repair, quadriceps and hamstring strength, and flexion and extension deficit were not related to 32- to 37-year outcomes.

Conclusion:

Reduced self-reported knee function and single-leg hop performance 4 years after ACL injury were prognostic factors for worse 32- to 37-year outcomes. Estimates exceeded clinically important thresholds, highlighting the importance of assessing these constructs when managing individuals with ACL injuries.

Registration:

NCT03182647 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Rehabilitation Principles to Consider for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

CONTEXT

Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is among the most common orthopaedic injuries, and reconstruction of a ruptured ACL is a common orthopaedic procedure. In general, surgical intervention is necessary to restore stability to the injured knee, and to prevent meniscal damage. Along with surgery, intense postoperative physical therapy is needed to restore function to the injured extremity. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has been the standard of care in recent decades, and advances in surgical technology have reintroduced the prospect of augmented primary repair of the native ACL via a variety of methods.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A search of PubMed database of articles and reviews available in English was performed through 2020. The search terms ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament repair, bridge enhanced acl repair, suture anchor repair, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal bracing, suture ligament augmentation, and internal brace ligament augmentation were used.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

RESULTS

No exact consensus exists on effective rehabilitation protocols after ACL repair techniques, as the variation in published protocols seem even greater than the variation in those for ACLR. For some techniques such as internal bracing and dynamic interligamentary stabilization, it is likely permissible for the patients to progress to full weightbearing and discontinue bracing sooner. However, caution should be applied with regard to earlier return to sport than after ACLR as to minimize risk for retear.

CONCLUSION

More research is needed to address how physical therapies must adapt to these innovative repair techniques. Until that is accomplished, we recommend that physical therapists understand the differences among the various ACL surgery techniques discussed here and work with the surgeons to develop a rehabilitation protocol for their mutual patients.

STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY (SORT)

C.

Suture tape augmentation improves laxity of MCL repair in the ACL reconstructed knee

PURPOSE

Medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury is very common and surgical repair is sometimes necessary. Especially in the setting of simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) as the ACL is the secondary restraint against valgus stress. The goal of this study was to evaluate knee biomechanics after suture repair of the MCL augmented with suture tape, as compared to MCL repair alone, in the setting of concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Fifteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a six-degrees-of-freedom robotic system under four loadings: (a) an 89.0 N anterior tibial load, (b) a 5.0 Nm internal and external rotation torque, (c) a 10.0 Nm valgus load, (d) a 7.0 Nm valgus load combined with 5.0 Nm internal rotation torque as a static simulated pivot-shift. The tested conditions were ACLR with the following states: (1) MCL intact, (2) MCL deficient, (3) MCL Repair, and (4) MCL repair augmented with suture tape (MCL Repair + ST). Under the different knee loadings, the tibial displacement, and the force in either the intact MCL, suture repaired MCL or repaired MCL-suture tape complex was measured.

RESULTS

While neither the MCL Repair nor the MCL Repair + ST restored valgus rotation to the MCL intact state, displacement was significantly smaller after MCL Repair + ST (p < 0.05). The knee rotation under external rotation torque in MCL Repair + ST did not differ MCL intact (n.s.), while with MCL Repair the rotation was significantly greater (p < 0.05). MCL Repair + ST did not cause an over-constraint of the knee in any of the tested loading conditions.

CONCLUSION

In a combined ACL-reconstruction-MCL-repair model, MCL Repair augmented with suture tape improved valgus and external rotation laxity when compared to MCL suture repair alone. Suture tape augmentation may provide this additional means of stabilization and can be added at the time of surgical repair of the MCL. Clinically this may result in lower failure rates and less residual laxity after MCL repair, as well as shorter immobilization times and faster return to play.

Diffusion tensor imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament following primary repair with internal bracing: A longitudinal study

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides information about tissue microstructure and its degree of organization by quantifying water diffusion. We aimed to monitor longitudinal changes in DTI parameters (fractional isotropy, FA; mean diffusivity, MD; axial diffusivity, AD; radial diffusivity, RD) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) following primary repair with internal bracing (IBLA). Fourteen patients undergoing IBLA were enrolled prospectively and scheduled for clinical follow-up, including instrumented laxity testing, and DTI at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. DTI was also performed in seven healthy subjects. Fiber tractography was used for 3D segmentation of the whole ACL volume, from which median DTI parameters were calculated. The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) served as a control. Longitudinal DTI changes were assessed using a linear mixed model, and repeated measures correlations were calculated between DTI parameters and clinical laxity tests. At follow-up, thirteen patients had a stable knee and one patient sustained an ACL rerupture after 12 months postoperatively. The ACL repair showed a significant decrease of FA within the first 12 months after surgery, followed by stable FA values thereafter, while ACL diffusivities decreased over time returning towards normal values at 24 months postoperatively. For PCL there were no significant DTI changes over time. There was a significant correlation between ACL FA and laxity tests (r = -0.42, P = .017). This study has shown the potential of DTI to longitudinally monitor diffusion changes in the ACL following IBLA. The DTI findings suggest that healing of the ACL repair is incomplete at 24 months postoperatively.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Preference Most Dependent on Patient Age: A Survey of United States Surgeons

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to define the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) graft preference of surgeons and to explore factors associated with their predilection.

METHODS

A 15-question survey regarding ACLR graft preference in various situations was completed by 514 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Association of North America surgeons. Surgeon and practice demographics, along with various patient factors, were evaluated with bivariate and multivariable models for association with surgeon preference. Surgeons were also queried about their preference for their own ACLR. For surgeons who personally sustained an ACL, an additional 6 questions inquired about their experience.

RESULTS

Surgeons reported the 5 most important factors in patient graft choice, in order: patient age, graft failure in literature and practice, pivot sport, and patient preference. Autograft patellar and quadriceps tendon were strongly preferred for younger, pivoting athletes (P < .001), among those with fellowship training (47% vs 33%, P = .006), in academic practices (52% vs 44%, P = .003), and in more sports medicine-specific practices, with a higher number of ACLRs performed per year (P < .001). Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, and Southwest surgeons had lower hamstring autograft preference (P < .001). Non-fellowship-trained surgeons preferred hamstring autograft (P = .010). Allograft was preferred for older patients (P < .001). Nonsignificant predictors included highest level of athlete for whom an ACLR had been performed, level of athlete serving as team physician, and years in practice. No factors were associated with surgeon preference for their own ACLR despite deeming these factors important for patients. ACL tears were reported by 13% of respondents, with 86% stating it influenced their decision to enter orthopaedics.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age was the most important factor in graft choice, with patellar and quadriceps tendon autograft the preferred graft for ACLR for younger, pivoting athletes. Fellowship training and practice demographics were also correlated with graft choice for patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Graft preference for ACLR varies among surgeons and is associated with surgeon experience and patient characteristics, including patient age, type of sport, and patient preference.

Repair versus reconstruction for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: a study protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background

For active patients with a tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) who would like to return to active level of sports, the current surgical gold standard is reconstruction of the ACL. Recently, there has been renewed interest in repairing the ACL in selected patients with a proximally torn ligament. Repair of the ligament has (potential) advantages over reconstruction of the ligament such as decreased surgical morbidity, faster return of range of motion, and potentially decreased awareness of the knee. Studies comparing both treatments in a prospective randomized method are currently lacking.

Methods

This study is a multicenter prospective block randomized controlled trial. A total of 74 patients with acute proximal isolated ACL tears will be assigned in a 1:1 allocation ratio to either (I) ACL repair using cortical button fixation and additional suture augmentation or (II) ACL reconstruction using an all-inside autologous hamstring graft technique. The primary objective is to assess if ACL repair is non-inferior to ACL reconstruction regarding the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at two-years postoperatively. The secondary objectives are to assess if ACL repair is non-inferior with regards to (I) other patient-reported outcomes measures (i.e. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm score, Forgotten Joint Score, patient satisfaction and pain), (II) objective outcome measures (i.e. failure of repair or graft defined as rerupture or symptomatic instability, reoperation, contralateral injury, and stability using the objective IKDC score and Rollimeter/KT-2000), (III) return to sports assessed by Tegner activity score and the ACL-Return to Sports Index at two-year follow-up, and (IV) long-term osteoarthritis at 10-year follow-up.

Discussion

Over the last decade there has been a resurgence of interest in repair of proximally torn ACLs. Several cohort studies have shown encouraging short-term and mid-term results using these techniques, but prospective randomized studies are lacking. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial has been designed to assess whether ACL repair is at least equivalent to the current gold standard of ACL reconstruction in both subjective and objective outcome scores.

Trial registration

Registered at Netherlands Trial Register (NL9072) on 25th of November 2020.