Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Prospective Assessment of the Clavicular Hook Plate Versus the Double Double-Button Suture Procedure

Outcomes of arthroscopic coracoclavicular management for acromioclavicular joint injuries: A systematic review

Introduction

Various surgical procedures for coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair have been described for symptomatic acromioclavicular joint dislocations, with none emerging as a clear gold standard. There has been increased interest in arthroscopic approaches. This systematic review evaluates clinical outcomes after arthroscopic surgeries used to treat chronic and acute AC joint dislocations.

Methods

We searched three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and OVID [MEDLINE]) from database inception to December 20, 2022. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: studies evaluating humans, English language studies, level of evidence I to IV, and studies investigating clinical outcomes in patients following arthroscopic surgery for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Studies on open reconstruction techniques only were excluded. Primary outcomes included function/pain scores, coracoclavicular distances, complications, and revision rates.

Results

Fifty-two studies were included. In 33 studies, postoperative Constant-Murley scores ranged from 82.8 to 99 points. Postoperative VAS scores ranged from 0.3 to 4.1 in 16 studies. In 46 studies, revision rates ranged from 0 % to 44.4 %. We did not observe a difference in revision rates between chronic and acute cases (P = 0.268). Complications were more common in chronic than acute cases (25.5 % vs. 16.4 %; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic surgery for chronic and acute CC ligament injuries exceeds the MCID and PASS for several outcomes, with low failure rates. Arthroscopic CC reconstruction is a safe and effective alternative for chronic AC joint dislocations.

Level of evidence

IV (Systematic Review of Level I-IV Studies).

[Current treatment concepts of the lateral clavicle and the acromioclavicular joint]

Injurie to the lateral clavicle and acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) are frequent events which are relevant to everyday life and particularly affect active adults at the age of 20-40 years. The Rockwood classification has been established for the classification of ACJ injuries. Lateral clavicle fractures are classified according to the Neer classification or the Jäger and Breitner classification. A newly established classification is the Cho classification. Depending on the injury pattern and in particular the presence of instability, various conservative and surgical care strategies are used. This article provides an overview of the various treatment concepts.

Comparison of clinical efficacy between reconstruction of the superior acromioclavicular ligament with acellular dermal allografts and clavicular hook plate in acromioclavicular dislocations

PURPOSES

We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of superior acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction (SALR) using acellular dermal allograft with that of clavicular hook plate fixation (HP) in patients with acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations. We hypothesized that the SALR could provide more stability than hook plate.

METHODS

Twenty-two cases of acute AC joint dislocation between November 2021 to December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the treatment with SALR (12 cases) or HP (10 cases). Patients were evaluated radiologically and clinically using coracoclavicular distance and ratio, pain visual analogue scale (PVAS), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) at postoperative 3 months and 1 year. We evaluated whether patient achieve MCID of PVAS at the last visit, based on the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of PVAS.

RESULTS

The SALR group showed a lower rate of reduction loss (8.3 % vs. 40.0 %) and similar clinical outcomes compared to the hook plate group. Initial SANE score was statistically significantly lower in SALR group (SANE: SALR, 45.8 ± 20.7; HP, 68.0 ± 15.5, p = 0.009), but there were no significant differences in final clinical outcomes, including PVAS, ASES, and SANE scores.

CONCLUSION

SALR with acellular dermal allograft demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes to hook plate fixation and may offer a viable alternative, especially in complicated cases.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

No Significant Difference between Suture Button and Hook Plate in Treating Acute Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

This study aims to systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of the suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixations for treating acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search based on the preferred reporting items from systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing SB and HP in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Constant score, visual analogue scale (VAS), coracoclavicular distance, operation time, and occurrence of complications were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools and the ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were included, consisting of two RCTs and 14 non-RCTs, with 471 patients in the SB group and 445 patients in the HP group. Among the included studies that reported patient-reported outcomes, four study indicated significantly higher Constant score in the SB group compared to the HP group, while the remaining five studies found no difference between the groups. Among the five included studies that reported VAS scores, two showed statistically significant differences favoring SB. Among 10 included studies reported operation time, three demonstrated shorter operation time for SB compared to HP, while two indicated longer operation time for SB surgery compared to HP. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rates of coracoclavicular distance and complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests no clear clinical superiority of SB over HP in treating acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocations. While some studies show SB may offer benefits like higher constant score and lower VAS scores, most outcomes reveal no significant differences.

Comparison of Double Endobutton and Clavicular Hook Plate in Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) disruptions are corrected by surgery either with an endobutton or a hook plate. The results in the long term were found to be similar in many randomized controlled trials. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the functional outcome and complications of double endo button versus clavicular hook plate (CHP) for ACJ disruption (Rockwood types III-VI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two authors independently searched related articles from electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science) till January 26, 2022. The data were extracted from the related articles and analyzed by Stata software. For bias calculation of each study, the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the RevMan 5.4 software were used.

RESULTS

14 cohort studies, 2 randomized control trial studies, and 1 case-control study including patients were selected in this meta-analysis. The results of our study showed a significantly higher Constant-Murley Score (WMD 5.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.23-9.36), Visual Analog Scale (WMD- 0.63, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.46]) and University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score (UCLA) scale (WMD 3.32, 95% CI [2.87, 3.77]) for double endobutton group. At the same time, some complications like implant failure were more common in the double endobutton group.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows better functional and clinical outcomes of shoulder joint for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) disruption cases (Rockwood types III-VI) with no need for secondary operation, unlike the CHP. Complications like subacromial erosion, ACJ arthrodesis, and infection rate are higher in the CHP group, whereas the chance of implant failure is higher in the double endobutton group.

Coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: clinical and imaging outcomes

BACKGROUND

There are few clinical and radiographic studies of coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. Additionally, reported AC joint reduction rates vary.

HYPOTHESIS

Arthroscopically assisted double-bundle semitendinosus tendon autografts with CC and AC ligament reconstruction for AC joint reconstruction provide AC joint stability and improved function at the final visit.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of prospectively collected data, 21 patients surgically treated for chronic AC joint dislocation (Rockwood III-V) were assessed clinically and radiographically preoperatively, and at day 1, 3 months, 12 months, and at a final visit (>24 months) postoperatively. Clinical assessments included Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. The CC vertical distance (CCD) on the affected and unaffected sides [CCD ratio (%)] on the anterosuperior view were measured. AC joint vertical reduction loss was defined as an increase in the CCD ratio of >25%. Horizontal AC joint instability was evaluated on axillary views. Pearsons' correlation coefficients were generated to examine the relationships among postoperative clinical scores, CCD ratio, interval from injury to surgery, and age at the time of surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-one shoulders in 21 patients (mean age, 40.0 years at the time of surgery; 16 men, 5 women) were evaluated with a mean 31.7-month follow-up period. The mean Constant scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and CCD ratios significantly improved from preoperatively to the final visit (57.4 ± 10.1, 49.1 ± 12.1, 101.6 ± 64.1 preoperatively; 89.6 ± 5.3, 96.5 ± 4.2, 9.9 ± 34.5 at the final visit, respectively [P < .001 for all]). Vertical AC and horizontal AC joint instability were observed in 4 shoulders (19.0%) and in 1 shoulder (4.8%), respectively. However, there was no significant correlation between the increase in CCD and clinical scores at the final visit (Constant score; r = 0.179, P = .438: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; r = -0.260, P = .256) or the interval from injury to surgery (r = 0.099, P = .669) or age at the time of surgery (r = 0.019, P = .935). No clinical complications were associated with clinical symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent the index procedure achieved significant improvement in shoulder function without complications related clinical symptom after a mean follow-up interval of 31.7 months. In contrast, the rates of total ACJ instability in the vertical and horizontal planes were unsatisfactory but compatible with those in previous studies.

3D C-arm navigated suture button implantation for AC joint dislocations - the pilot study

PURPOSE

The surgical treatment of acute traumatic AC joint dislocations is still a subject of scientific debate in the literature. The arthroscopically assisted stabilization procedure with a suture button system has been successfully established and is widely used in daily practice. It is minimally invasive and allows the anatomical reconstruction of the torn coracoclavicular ligaments in one step with a permanent implant that does not have to be removed in a second operation. This clinical pilot study is the first to describe the new method of navigated suture button implantation with the future aim of further reducing surgical invasiveness and further increasing surgical precision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

10 patients with a Rockwood 3b/5 injury could be included in the prospective study (DRKS00031855) within 5 months according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Surgical stabilization was performed with a suture button system via a navigated coracoclavicular drill tunnel. Demographic and radiological data as well as information on health and shoulder function were collected from patient records, X-rays, DVT scan and 3 questionnaires (DASH, NHS and Eq. 5D) at the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative (discharge, 6 weeks and 3 months) time points.

RESULTS

All operations could be performed within 8.8 days (± 6.81) after trauma. The average operation time was 50.3 min (± 8.81). The mean distance of the drill hole in the clavicle to the AC joint was 26.6 mm (± 2.63). The radiologically measured vertical coracoclavicular distance was 38.8 mm (± 6.16) at discharge and 41.11 mm (± 7.51) at 3 months. This loss of reduction was not statistically significant. In contrast, the DASH, NHS and Eq. 5D results showed significant improvement from discharge to 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided 3D C-arm navigated AC joint suture button stabilization is feasible in everyday surgical practice. It may be possible to achieve a further reduction in invasiveness while at the same time increasing the accuracy of implant positioning. Further clinical studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period are necessary to enable a comparison with conventional methods.

Proximal humerus fracture and acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Proximal humerus fractures and injuries to the acromioclavicular joint are among the most common traumatic diseases of the upper extremity. Fractures of the proximal humerus occur most frequently in older people and are an indicator fracture of osteoporosis. While a large proportion of only slightly displaced fractures can be treated non-operatively, more complex fractures require surgical treatment. The choice of optimal treatment and the decision between joint-preserving surgery by means of osteosynthesis or endoprosthetic treatment is often a difficult decision in which both fracture morphology factors and individual factors should be taken into account. If endoprosthetic treatment is indicated, satisfactory long-term functional and clinical results have been achieved with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint occur primarily in young, athletic individuals. The common classification according to Rockwood divides the injury into 6 degrees of severity depending on the dislocation. This classification forms the basis for the decision on non-operative or surgical treatment. The indication for surgical treatment for higher-grade injuries is the subject of controversial debate in the latest literature. In chronic injuries, an autologous tendon transplant is also performed. Whereas in the past, treatment was often carried out using a hook plate, which was associated with complications, the gold standard today is minimally invasive treatment using Endobutton systems. This review provides an overview of the two injury patterns and discusses the various treatment options.

Suture Button Could Result in More Functional Outcomes Improvement and Pain Relief Than Hook Plate Technique for Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

PURPOSE

To systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of the suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixations for treating acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACD).

METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search of the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases was performed and Level I-IV evidence studies comparing the SB and HP procedures for acute ACD were included. Studies that met the following exclusion criteria were excluded: (1) letters, comments, case reports, reviews, animal studies, cadaveric studies, biomechanical studies, and study protocols; (2) incomplete data; and (3) repeated studies and data. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of nonrandomized studies. Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, operation time, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), and complications were recorded and the mean differences of VAS and Constant were compared with preset minimal clinically important difference.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 363 patients treated with SB procedures and 432 patients with the HP procedure were included. In terms of patient-reported outcomes, 5 of the 13 included studies reported significantly greater Constant score in SB group and most (4/5) used arthroscopic SB technique. Statistically significant differences in favor of SB were found in 3 of the 7 included studies in terms of VAS score whereas none of them reached the minimal clinically important difference. In terms of recurrent instability, no statistically significant difference was noted. All studies showed that the SB technique resulted in lower estimated blood loss. No difference was detected in CCD and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current body of evidence, it is suggested that employment of the SB technique may confer advantageous outcomes when compared to the HP technique in acute ACD patients. These potential benefits may include higher Constant scores, lower pain levels, and no discernible increases in operation time, CCD, or complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

3D C-arm navigated acromioclavicular joint stabilization

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular joint separations are varied. Frequently, suspension devices (SD) are inserted for stabilization under arthroscopic view. This study investigates the feasibility and accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) digital-volume-tomography (DVT) C-arm navigated implantation with regard to the general trend toward increasingly minimally invasive procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The implantation of a TightRope® suture button system (SD) via a navigated vertical drill channel through the clavicle and coracoid was investigated in 10 synthetic shoulder models with a mobile isocentric C-arm image intensifier setup in the usual parasagittal position. Thereby, in addition the placement of an additive horizontal suture cerclage via a navigated drill channel through the acromion was assessed.

RESULTS

All vertical drill channels in the Coracoclavicular (CC) direction could be placed in a line centrally through the clavicle and the coracoid base. The horizontal drill channels in the Acromioclavicular (AC) direction ran strictly in the acromion, without affecting the AC joint or lateral clavicle. All SD could be well inserted and anchored. After tensioning and knotting of the system, the application of the horizontal AC cerclage was easily possible. The image quality was good and all relevant structures could be assessed well.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative 3D DVT imaging of the shoulder joint using a mobile isocentric C-arm in the usual parasagittal position to the patient is possible. Likewise, DVT navigated SD implantation at the AC joint in CC and AC direction on a synthetic shoulder model. By combining both methods, the application in vivo could be possible. Further clinical studies on feasibility and comparison with established methods should be performed.

Suture button placed beneath plate fixation for complex distal clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular joint injuries: a technical note

Patients with complex distal clavicle and acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are at risk of loss of reduction, especially when plates are removed postoperatively. The purpose is to review the authors' preferred technique for treatment of distal clavicle and AC joint injuries utilizing combined suture button and plate fixation, aiming to optimize biomechanical strength of fixation and limit loss of reduction after implant removal. Pre-contoured locking plates or hook plates were utilized atop suture buttons to maintain reduction and optimize biomechanical strength. At final follow-up over one year after plate removal and suture button retention in thirteen patients, reduction was maintained to coracoclavicular interval 1.5 ± 1.4 mm less than contralaterally. DASH scores at final follow-up averaged 5.7 ± 2.5 (range: 3.3 - 11.7). Placing suture button fixation prior to and beneath plate fixation in complex AC joint injuries and distal clavicle fractures allows for maintained fixation and prevents loss of reduction after plate removal.

Clinical outcomes for grades III-V acromioclavicular dislocations favor double-button fixation compared to clavicle hook plate fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of both randomized controlled and observational studies comparing double-button suture fixation to hook plate fixation for types III-IV acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

METHODS

Systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, including all levels 1-3 studies from 2000 to 2022. Clinical outcome scores, range of motion, and complications were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's ROB2 tool and ROBINs-I tool. MINORS and modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) were used to assess within study quality. The GRADE system was used to assess the overall quality of the body of evidence. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ2 and I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included. Three of the four included LOE II and eleven of the LOE III studies had a high risk of bias. Study quality was considered poor and fair for 67% by MINORS criteria and 93% for CMS criteria. The pooled estimate (SMD 0.662) for all clinical outcomes was statistically significant and in favor of button repair (p = 0.0001). The pooled estimate (SMD 0.662) for all VAS pain scores was statistically significant, again in favor of button repair (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated significantly better outcomes of button repair for acute ACJ dislocations when compared to clavicle hook plate. Button repair is also associated with a 2.2 times lower risk for complications. However, risk of bias is high, and study quality within and between studies was low. These results, therefore, must be viewed with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mini-open vs. arthroscopic double tight-rope reconstruction after acute AC-joint dislocation: a comparison in functional outcome and sports activity

INTRODUCTION

In athletes, acromioclavicular joint disruptions account for up to 50% of all shoulder injuries. In high-grade injuries, surgery is favored to ensure a correct restoration of the joint, especially in young athletes. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological and sport related outcomes of the arthroscopic stabilization with the fixation of the AC joint in a mini-open approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

19 patients treated arthroscopically (ASK) and 26 patients with an acute AC-joint dislocation Rockwood V who had undergone the mini-open (MO) surgery were included. Constant Murley Score (CMS), Taft Score (TS) and the Simple Shoulder Tests (SST) were evaluated. The sports activity level was determined according to Valderrabano and the athlete's recovery of their athletic activity level after surgery according to Rhee. Furthermore, all available X-ray images were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients in the ASK group achieved an average score of 11.7 ± 0.6 points in the SST, 10.3 ± 1.8 points in the TS and 91.2 ± 11.8 points in the CMS. On average, patients in the MO group achieved results of 10.5 ± 1.4 points in the SST, 11.7 ± 0.7 points in the TS and 91.6 ± 9.8 points in the CMS. The ASK group showed significant difference regarding the CC distance in side comparison (Δ = 3.6 mm), whereas no significant difference was found in the MO group (Δ = 0.8 mm). In comparison of both groups, the posterior as well as the combined translation were significantly greater in the ASK group than in the MO group (posterior: ASK: 24.8 mm, MO: 19.3 mm, combined: ASK: 29.1 mm, MO: 20.9 mm). Residual horizontal instability was greater in the ASK group (43%) than in the MO group (32%). Similar results were achieved in sports activity and the recovery of athletic activity (Valderrabano: ASK: 2.8, MO: 2.6; Rhee: ASK: 1.6, MO: 1.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques prove to be effective for the stabilization of high-grade AC-joint disruptions in athletes and showed excellent clinical results. From a radiographic standpoint, the mini-open procedure appears superior to the arthroscopic technique. After mini-open surgery postoperative loss of correction is less common and greater horizontal stability is achieved. The results also suggest the mini-open technique is superior to the arthroscopic procedure when aiming to restore the athlete's original level of sports activity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety in Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation with Five Different Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

This network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of suture anchors (SA), tendon grafts (TG), hook plates (HP), Tight-Rope (TR), and EndoButton (EB) in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation. The Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception date to June 3, 2022. Studies included all eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies with the comparison of five different fixation systems among SA, TG, HP, TR, and EB were identified. All studies were reviewed, performed data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias independently by two reviewers. The primary outcomes are Constant-Murley score (CMS) improvement for assessing clinical efficacy, and complications. The second outcomes are visual analog scale (VAS) for assessing pain relief and the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) for assessing postoperative joint reduction. Version 2 of the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) were used to assess the RCTs and non-randomized trials, respectively. The continuous outcomes were presented as mean differences (MD), and risk ratios (OR) were used for dichotomous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) results were calculated to offer a ranking of each intervention. We identified 31 eligible trials, including 1687 patients in total. HP showed less CMS improvement than TR and EB in both the Network Meta-analysis (NMA) and pairwise meta-analysis. HP also showed less CMS improvement than SA in NMA. For pain relief, HP performed worse than TR both in pairwise meta-analysis and NMA. No significant differences were found for the measured value of CCD. Both TR and EB showed a lower incidence of complications than HP in pairwise meta-analysis. The rank of SUCRA for CMS improvement was as follows: SA, TR, EB, TG, and HP; for pain relief: TR, EB, TG, SA, and HP; for CCD: HP, TR, SA, EB, and TG. For complications, HP showed the highest rank, followed by TG, EB, TR, and SA. SA shows better clinical effectiveness and reliable safety in the treatment of acute ACJ dislocation. Although HP is the most widely used surgical option currently, it should be carefully taken into consideration for its high incidence of complications.

[Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instabilities]

Acromioclavicular joint instabilities are one of the most common injuries of the shoulder girdle. Diagnostic measures include the vertical and horizontal components of instability. The main goals of treatment include pain reduction, joint stabilization, and return to physical activity. For operative treatment, there are numerous techniques available. Recently, minimally-invasive techniques were developed and showed equal results as with open approach. These procedures facilitate simultaneous treatment of concomitant shoulder lesions and reduce soft tissue trauma as well as the risk of infection. This article presents an overview of such minimally-invasive techniques for both acute and chronic instabilities. Both techniques address the aspect of horizontal instability, which was found to compromise clinical results. For an acute injury, we describe the use of a low-profile button system combined with an additional acromioclavicular cerclage. In the chronic setting with a bidirectional (vertical and horizontal) instability, a free tendon graft combined with a single TightRope augmentation is recommended.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes After TightRope Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Background

There is limited information regarding the long-term efficacy of techniques for surgical fixation after acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of hook plate (HP) and TightRope (TR) fixation for acute AC joint dislocations by comparing the long-term clinical and radiological patient outcomes.

Study Design

Cohort study, Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed data from 61 patients with acute AC joint dislocation between July 2011 and November 2015. The patients were grouped according to surgical procedure: HP (n = 36) and TR (n = 25). Clinical outcomes at final follow-up were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score; the Korean Shoulder Score; and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. Side-to-side coracoclavicular (CC) distance on radiographs, postoperative complications, and the rate of subacromial erosion in the HP group were also assessed between procedures.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 7.0 ± 1.0 years, and there were no significant differences in pain or outcome scores between the HP and TR groups (all P > .05). Forward flexion was better in the TR group (172.6° ± 5.6°) versus the HP group (166.0° ± 10.8°; P = .002). The percentages of patients with a difference in the side-to-side CC distance of <5 mm were 83.3% and 72.0% in the HP and TR groups, respectively (P = .288). Complications were found in 2 patients in the HP group and 1 in the TR group (P ≥ .999). Subacromial erosion was observed in 41.7% of patients after HP fixation, with no difference in VAS pain scores at the final follow-up in patients with versus without subacromial erosion (P = .719).

Conclusion

When comparing HP with TR fixation for the treatment of acute AC joint dislocations, there were no significant differences in functional outcome scores, final CC distance, or complications. Slightly better forward flexion was seen after TR fixation. Subacromial erosion occurred in 40% of patients after HP fixation, but this did not affect long-term VAS pain scores. Both surgical techniques are effective treatment options for AC joint dislocation.

Clavicular hook plate versus dog-bone technique for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a retrospective cohort study comparing clinical outcome scores, complications, and costs

INTRODUCTION

Arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) ligament fixation techniques have been promoted as providing superior outcomes for the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. Nevertheless, there is a lack of high-level evidence for clinically relevant benefits. At our institute, orthopaedic surgeons use an arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament fixation technique (DB), while general trauma surgeons use a clavicular hook plate (cHP) technique. The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes, complication rates, and costs between the two groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The hospital database was searched for patients treated for acute traumatic high-grade (Rockwood Typ ≥ III) ACJ dislocation using either a cHP or arthroscopically assisted DB technique between 2010 and 2019. Seventy-nine patients could be included (56 patients in the cHP group and 23 in the DB group). QuickDASH scores, subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, pain scores (numerical pain rating scale 10), and complication rates were retrospectively collected through phone interviews and by screening patient charts as well as surgical reports. Costs per patient were obtained from the hospital's accounting system.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 54 ± 33.7 and 45 ± 21.7 months in the cHP and DB group, respectively. QuickDASH and SSV scores did not differ, but patients in the cHP group reported significantly lower pain scores (p = 0.033). More patients reported hypertrophic or disturbing scars (p = 0.49) and sensibility disturbances (p = 0.007) in the cHP group. Three patients suffered from a frozen shoulder in the DB group (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported outcomes are excellent after long-term follow-up for both techniques. There are no clinically relevant differences in clinical outcome scores based on our results and a review of the literature. Both techniques certainly have their benefits regarding secondary outcome measures.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

Level 3, retrospective cohort study.

Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review

Background

While a number of treatment options exist for repair of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation, none have emerged as the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on surgical treatment of acute, high-grade (Rockwood grades III-V) ACJ separations in order to compare outcomes between direct fixation and tendon graft ligament reconstruction.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature evaluating outcomes for acute ACJ separation treatment with direct fixation or free biologic tendon graft reconstruction was performed. The following databases were examined: the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2021), and Embase (1980-2021). Studies were included if they reported a mean time to surgery as <6 weeks, contained >10 patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up, and reported clinical or radiographic outcomes.

Results

A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies reported outcomes following tendon graft ligament reconstruction (n = 128 patients). There were multiple methods of direct fixation. Thirty-three studies utilized suture button constructs (n = 1138), 16 studies used hook plates (n = 567), 2 studies used coracoclavicular screws (n = 94), 2 studies used suture fixation (n = 93), 2 studies used suture anchor (n = 55), 2 studies used suture cerclage fixation (n = 87), 1 used single multistrand titanium cable (n = 24), and 1 used K wire (n = 11). The mean follow-up Constant scores ranged from 77.5 to 97.1 in the fixation group compared to 90.3-96.6 in the tendon graft group. The mean visual analog scale scores ranged from 0 to 4.5 in the fixation group and 0.1-1 in the tendon graft group. Net CC distance ranged from 17.5 to 3.6 mm in the fixation group and 7.4-4 mm in the tendon graft group. The revision rates ranged from 0.0% to 18.18% in the direct fixation group and 5.88%-17% in the tendon graft group.

Conclusion

Direct fixation and tendon graft reconstruction for management of acute, high-grade ACJ separations have similar patient subjective and radiographic outcomes, as well as complication and revision rates at a minimum 1-year follow-up.

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON

Objectives

We aimed to compare the functional and radiographical outcomes of reconstruction of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using Hook Plate (HP) versus Suture Endobutton (SE) fixation techniques.

Methods

Forty-six consecutive patients with grade III to V ACJ dislocation according to Rockwood classification who underwent either HP or SE fixation in the period between January 2017 and June 2020 were evaluated. The treatment modalities were divided into either HP or SE fixation. The radiological assessment included standard anterior-posterior (AP) views to evaluate coracoclavicular (CC) distances for vertical reduction.

Results

CC distances were grouped as preoperative (CC¹), early postoperative (CC²), and late postoperative (CC³). The distance variance between CC² and CC³ was referred as ΔCC (CC³ - CC²). A statistically significant difference was found in ΔCC between the two groups (p=0.008). ΔCC was significantly higher in the SE group compared to the HP group (p<0.05). The Constant and UCLA Scores of patients in the SE group were found to be significantly higher than in the HP group patients.

Conclusion

Clinical outcomes were more satisfactory in patients with acute unstable ACJ dislocation who underwent SE compared to HP procedures, at the end of the first year. Evidence Level IV; Case Series.

Superior clinical results for early arthroscopic treatment of grade IIIb and V acromioclavicular joint instability compared to delayed operative treatment

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopy-assisted cortical fixation devices have been increasingly used in the operative management of both acute and chronic cases of acromioclavicular joint instability (ACJI). It has been hypothesized that delayed surgical management leads to inferior clinical and radiologic outcomes compared to acute treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes, scapula dyskinesia, and failure or revision rates of arthroscopically treated acute and chronic ACJI.

METHODS

This retrospective study of prospectively collected data included all surgically treated patients with grade IIIb and V chronic ACJI between 2013 and 2017, matched 1:1 to a group of acute grade IIIb and V ACJI patients treated during the same time period. Chronic ACJI was defined as delayed surgical treatment >21 days after injury. Chronic cases received an additional hamstring autograft next to the suture pulley systems. Follow-up was obtained at an average of 3.2 years (range: 1.4-6.2). Clinical outcome scores included the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Taft Score (TF), Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS), ACJI Score, Sick Scapula Score (SSS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Subjective Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, and the visual analog scale pain score. Radiologic follow-up was obtained pre- and postoperatively and at final follow-up. The 2-year results were compared to the results of a 1:1 matched-pair group comprising patients who were treated with an acute ACJI during the same period.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (80.5%) of 41 chronic ACJI cases were available for follow-up and were compared with 33 matched-pair cases of acute ACJI (of 41). The clinical scores were significantly better in the acute cohort for the CMS (92 ± 8 vs. 88 ± 8, P = .030), ASES (91 ± 13 vs. 85 ± 13, P = .002), SSS (1.4 ± 1.6 vs. 3.4 ± 2.5, P = .0004), NCS (86 ± 13 vs. 81 ± 13, P = .049), TF (9.9 ± 1.9 vs. 9.0 ± 2.1, P = .030), and ACJI (83 ± 13 vs. 75 ± 1, P = .003). In contrast to the chronic cohort, the acute cohort illustrated a significant loss of reduction at follow-up (P = .020).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, early arthroscopy-assisted operative treatment of grade IIIb and V ACJIs seems superior to delayed surgical intervention of grade IIIb and V ACJIs. Furthermore, an additional autograft loop leads to less loss of reduction compared with suture pulley/suspensory loop fixation standalones.

Surgical treatments for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment is usually recommended for acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries. A wide variety of surgical techniques exist, and the literature does not strongly support one over the other. In this literature review, we describe and compare the results of different surgical treatments for the management of acute unstable ACJ dislocation and aim to guide surgeons on optimal treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was performed by searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Only studies with comparative data were included. The clinical and radiological outcomes of these studies were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in this literature review. We found no difference in outcomes between open and arthroscopic procedures. Coracoclavicular ligament (CCL) reconstruction techniques provide better results than the more rigid hook plate fixation. There is no evidence that biologic repair with tendon graft is superior to synthetic grafts. Furthermore, an autograft is not shown to be better than an allograft. Rigid fixation between the clavicle and coracoid and the non-anatomic Weaver-Dunn technique appears less popular in recent literature. The hook plate is associated with subacromial osteolysis, acromial erosion, and the morbidity of a secondary procedure.

DISCUSSION

There is a recent increase in publications on the reconstruction of the ACJ after injury, with new techniques focusing on the anatomic reconstruction of the CCLs aiming to restore both vertical and horizontal plane stability of the ACJ using synthetic/biological grafts. Despite the plethora of new techniques introduced, meaningful comparisons are difficult to draw due to the heterogeneity of the treatments used and the outcome measure used to assess the results.

High Early-onset acromioclavicular secondary pathologies after acute arthroscopic joint reduction: a cohort study

PURPOSE

The research aim was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of early secondary acromioclavicular (AC) joint disease in patients undergoing acute arthroscopic AC joint reduction and fixation and early complications of acute surgical treatment in patients with high-grade AC joint dislocation.

METHODS

Overall, 102 patients diagnosed with Rockwood type V AC joint dislocation and undergoing arthroscopic coracoclavicular fixation were included. Early clinical and radiological complications were evaluated, as well as risk factors of secondary AC joint pathology.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (28%) presented with a secondary AC joint pathology, with 24 and 5 cases of osteolysis and osteoarthritis, respectively. The main complication was a loss of reduction of ≥ 1 mm (78%). Patients aged > 55 years were more likely to develop a secondary AC joint disease (odds ratios (OR) = 10.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42 - 72.55, p = 0.021). Patients with osteolysis (OR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.16 - 9.27, p = 0.025) or loss of reduction of > 5 mm (OR = 7.4, 95% CI 2.31 - 24.08, p = 0.001) were more likely to develop AC joint pain. Patients with an initial over-reduction were less likely to develop a subluxated AC joint (OR = 0.033, 95% CI 0.0021-0.134, p = 0.001) CONCLUSION: Age > 55 years and female sex were identified as risk factors of early-onset secondary AC joint disease. Osteolysis and a loss of reduction of > 5 mm were risk factors of AC joint pain but not of revision surgery. The main early complication was a loss of reduction of ≥ 1 mm. An initial over-reduction of the distal clavicle was a protective factor to avoid AC joint subluxation.

No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The need for operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is unclear. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the outcomes after operative treatment with a hook plate with the outcomes after nonoperative treatment of acute Rockwood type III and type V AC joint dislocations separately.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-65 years with an acute type III or type V AC joint dislocation with the availability to start treatment within 3 weeks after trauma. All patients received the same standardized outpatient rehabilitation protocol and were followed up for 24 months. Assessments were based on radiographs, clinical examination findings, and questionnaires. The primary outcome was the Constant score (CS). The secondary outcomes were as follows: Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), QuickDASH score (abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), shoulder pain at rest and during movement rated using a visual analog scale, EQ-5D (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions) score, patient satisfaction, cosmesis, complications, and adverse events. The 4 groups were compared using 1-way analysis of variance and intention to treat.

RESULTS

The included patients (N = 124) (mean age, 40 years [range, 18-64 years]; 91% male patients) were randomized, stratified by type, to nonoperative treatment (type III, n = 33; type V, n = 30) or operative treatment with a hook plate (type III, n = 30; type V, n = 31) at a single center. Three patients randomized to physiotherapy dropped out before any follow-up measures, leaving 121 patients in the study. Complete clinical follow-up data were obtained from 118 patients at 24 months. At 3 months, patients in both nonoperatively treated groups had a significantly better mean CS, SSV, and QuickDASH score and had less pain at rest and during movement compared with patients treated operatively. At 6, 12, and 24 months, there were no significant differences in the CS, SSV, QuickDASH score, pain, or EQ-5D score between the groups regardless of intervention. At 24 months, the mean CS was 88 for nonoperatively treated type III patients vs. 91 for operatively treated type III patients and was 90 vs. 91 for type V patients (P = .477). At final follow-up, patients had regained 97% of the mean CS comparing the uninjured and injured shoulders and 86% of the patients rated the result as excellent or good. Eleven patients assigned to nonoperative treatment (18%, 6 type III and 5 type V) underwent surgery within 19 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the nonoperative and operative treatment groups had very good restoration of shoulder function and patient satisfaction at 24 months, and operative treatment did not lead to better outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment. In conclusion, our study does not support surgery with a hook plate in patients with acute Rockwood type III or type V AC joint dislocations.

Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage

PURPOSE

Purpose of this study was to demonstrate that a single tunnel reconstruction of high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint instabilities with implants of the second generation is sufficient for stabilisation, especially in combination with an AC cerclage.

METHODS

Patients with an acute AC-joint dislocation type Rockwood III-B and V were included. Besides clinical follow-up examination, radiographs were analysed. The functional outcome measures were Constant Score (CS), Taft score (TS), ACJI score and patient's satisfaction. Horizontal instability was evaluated by clinical examination and radiological with an Alexander view.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with a mean follow-up of 29 months were included. Ninety-seven per cent were satisfied with their result, with an average Subjective Shoulder Value of 90%. The CS averaged at 90 ± 10 points, TS at 11 ± 1 points and ACJI at 78 ± 18 points. Radiologically, 3 of 29 patients (10%) showed a persisting horizontal instability. The coracoclavicular (CC) distance improved from 22 preoperative to 10 mm postoperative, which was comparable to the contralateral side (10 mm, p = 0.103). At follow-up the CC distance increased to 13 mm (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

AC-joint stabilisation with a single tunnel reconstruction using a second-generation implant results in good to excellent clinical results with high patient satisfaction. The additional AC augmentation improves stability in horizontal instable AC-joints and is recommended in all high-grade AC joint stabilisations. Nonetheless, reduction was slightly lost over time due to an elongation or suture failure of the coraco-clavicular fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparison of open reduction and fixation with hook plate and modified closed reduction and fixation with tightrope loop plate for treatment of rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Objective

To compare the outcomes of open reduction and hook plate fixation (ORHPF) and modified TightRope loop plate fixation (MTRLPF) in the treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Methods

This was a retrospective study. Data on 71 patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation who underwent either ORHPF (n = 39) or MTRLPF (n = 32) between January 2016 and October 2019 were extracted and analyzed. Baseline data at injury were compared to evaluate the balance. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, Constant-Murley score and visual analog scores (VAS) score at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation were compared; further, at 12 months coracoclavicular distance and related complications were evaluated and compared.

Results

Both groups did not differ for any baseline data. At 1 and 3 months after operation, MTRLPF group exhibited a significantly better performance than the ORHPF group in VAS (1 month: 2.4 ± 1.8 vs 3.0 ± 1.7; 3 months: 1.2 ± 1.4 vs 1.8 ± 1.6), Constant-Murley (1 month: 75.2 ± 11.2 vs 63.8 ± 13.7; 3 months: 81.4 ± 9.8 vs 75.8 ± 10.6), DASH (1 month: 33.6 ± 6.8 vs 40.6 ± 6.1; 3 months: 21.2 ± 7.4 vs 25.6 ± 6.6). At 6 months, only Constant-Murley remained marginally significant (p = 0.048). At 12 months, no statistical difference was observed for any outcome variable (all P > 0.05 for VAS, Constant-Murley and DASH), coracoclavicular distance (12.7 ± 1.6 mm vs 12.2 ± 1.6 mm; P = 0.374), or overall complication rate (P = 0.763).

Conclusions

For Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation, both methods can achieve satisfactory 1-year results, but modified minimally invasive TightRope treatment is more advantageous in early functional recovery at 1 and 3-month follow-ups.

Does coracoclavicular augmentation additional to hook plate fixation provide benefits in acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation? A meta-analysis

Background

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is a common shoulder injury. In treating acute unstable ACJ dislocation, a hook plate (HP) is a straightforward and popular option for ensuring proper reduction and rigid fixation while promoting AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament healing. Surgeons typically remove the HP to prevent subacromial impingement and acromial osteolysis; however, concerns about redislocation after implant removal remain. Therefore, additional CC augmentation may be helpful in combination with HP fixation. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the outcomes and complications of HP fixation with or without additional CC augmentation for acute unstable ACJ dislocation.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for relevant case–control studies. The primary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures; the secondary outcomes were pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), CC distance (CCD), and complications. Continuous data were assessed using weighted standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and dichotomous data were evaluated with Mantel–Haenszel odds ratio (ORs) with 95% CIs.

Results

We analyzed one randomized control trial and four case–control studies comparing HP fixation with or without CC augmentation. A total of 474 patients with Rockwood type III or V ACJ dislocation were included. We found no differences in Constant–Murley score (SMD, − 0.58, 95% CI − 1.41 to 0.26; P = 0.18), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (SMD, 0.21, 95% CI − 0.10 to 0.52; P = 0.19), University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale score (SMD, − 0.02, 95% CI − 1.27 to 1.23; P = 0.97), or VAS pain score (SMD, 0.36, 95% CI − 0.16 to 0.88; P = 0.17) between groups. The CC augmentation group had lower odds of osteolysis (OR, 0.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.74; P = 0.01) and a shorter CCD (SMD, − 0.29, 95% CI − 0.57 to − 0.01; P = 0.04).

Conclusion

HP fixation with CC augmentation is preferable for acute unstable ACJ dislocations. Although CC augmentation did not provide additional benefits related to functional outcomes or pain, it resulted in greater reduction maintenance after implant removal and a 73% lower risk of acromial osteolysis.

Trial registration

PROSPERO (CRD42021271118).

Monopolar and Bipolar Combination Injuries of the Clavicle: Retrospective Incidence Analysis and Proposal of a New Classification System

Clavicle injuries are common, but only few case reports describe combined clavicular injuries (CCI). CCI include combinations between clavicular fractures and acromioclavicular/sternoclavicular joint dislocations (SCJD). We present the first general therapeutic recommendations for CCI based on a new classification and their distribution. A retrospective, epidemiological, big data analysis was based on ICD-10 diagnoses from 2012 to 2014 provided by the German Federal Statistical Office. CCI represent 0.7% of all clavicle-related injuries (n = 814 out of 114,003). SCJD show by far the highest proportion of combination injuries (13.2% of all SCJD were part of CCI) while the proportion of CCI in relation to the other injury entities was significantly less (p < 0.023). CCIs were classified depending on (1) the polarity (monopolar type I, 92.2% versus bipolar type II, 7.8%). Monopolar type I was further differentiated depending on (2) the positional relationship between the combined injuries: Ia two injuries directly at the respective pole versus Ib with an injury at one end plus an additional midshaft clavicle fracture. Type II was further differentiated depending on (3) the injured structures: IIa ligamento-osseous, type IIb purely ligamentous (rarest with 0.6%). According to our classification, the CCI severity increases from type Ia to IIb. CCI are more important than previously believed and seen as an indication for surgery. The exclusion of further, contra-polar injuries in the event of a clavicle injury is clinically relevant and should be focused.

Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

PURPOSE

To systematically review the outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

METHODS

Studies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, PubMed). All studies reporting functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Following data were extracted: authors and year, study design, level of evidence, number of patients, age, classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, time to surgery, surgical technique, follow-up, clinical and imaging outcomes, complications, and failures. Descriptive statistics was used, when a data pooling was not possible. Comparable outcomes were pooled to generate summary outcomes reported as frequency-weighted values. Quality appraisal was assessed through the MINORS checklist.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-three studies were included for a total of 4473 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 36.9 years. Mean follow-up was 42.06 months. Arthroscopy showed better ASES (p < 0.0001) and lower VAS pain score (p = 0.0249) compared to an open approach. Biologic and synthetic reconstructions demonstrated better results over osteosynthesis techniques. Biologic techniques showed overall better Constant (p = 0.0001) and DASH (p = 0.0215) scores, while synthetic reconstruction showed better UCLA score (p = 0.0001). Among suture buttons, triple button showed overall better results in Constant (p = 0.0001) and VAS (p = 0.0001) scores, while better results in DASH score (p = 0.0003) were achieved by 2 double button techniques. Overall, the level of evidence was low.

CONCLUSION

Biological and synthetic reconstructions achieved better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis. Among suture buttons, the triple button showed better functional performance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic and navigation-assisted two tunnel technique for coracoclavicular ligament augmentation of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations

Background

The purpose of this study was to present a navigated image-free augmentation technique for the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments and to report the clinical and radiological outcomes.

Methods

From 2013 to 2018, 35 eligible patients were treated with our navigated image-free ACJ- and CC-augmentation technique. The average follow-up was 3 years. Follow-up evaluations included the Constant-Murley Score, subjective shoulder value, Taft score, and the acromioclavicular joint instability (ACJI) score. The patients’ quality of life was assessed using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire. In addition, in accordance with the instability criteria, radiographs were evaluated before surgery, after surgery, and during follow-up.

Results

Overall, 25 patients (71%) suffered an acute type V disruption, 5 (14%) had a type IV disruption, and 5 (14%) had an acute Rockwood type IIIb injury. The mean Constant-Murley Score was 90 (range: 56–100; p = 0.53) on the injured side, and the mean subjective shoulder value was 92% (range: 80–100%). The mean Taft and ACJI scores were 10 (range: 4–12) and 86 (range: 34–100), respectively and the mean EQ-5D was 86 (range: 2–100). The mean CC difference of the injured side was 4 mm (range: 1.9–9.1 mm) at follow-up, which was not significantly different than that of the healthy side (p = 0.06). No fractures in the area of the clavicle or the coracoid were reported.

Conclusions

The arthroscopic- and navigation-assisted treatment of high-grade ACJ injuries in an anatomical double-tunnel configuration yields similar clinical and radiological outcomes as the conventional technique using an aiming device. Precise positioning of the navigation system prevents multiple drillings, which avoids fractures.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04406-2.

Comparison of the TightRope system versus hook plate in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a retrospective analysis

This study compared the results of the minimally invasive coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with a single TightRope (MITR) procedure and the hook plate (HP) procedure for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treatment. Sixteen patients with a mean age of 44.9 ± 11 years were treated with the MITR procedure. Nineteen patients with a mean age of 40.2 ± 8.7 years were treated using the HP procedure. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Constant–Murley Score (CMS), and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder score. Vertical displacement of the clavicle with reference to the height of the acromion was measured in standard anteroposterior radiographs. The mean follow-up was 27 months in the MITR group and 30 months in the HP group. No statistically significant differences were found between the MITR group and the HR group in terms of VAS score (0.4 ± 0.6 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.138), UCLA Shoulder score (33.9 ± 2.5 vs 33.7 ± 1.5, P = 0.843), or CMS (95.7 ± 7.3 vs 93.7 ± 6.6, P = 0.400). No redislocation was identified in the HP group, while redislocation occurred in 1 of 16 (6.3%) patients in the MITR group. One patient in the HP group (5.3%) had acromial osteolysis, while no acromial osteolysis was found in the MITR group. No other adverse events, such as infections, tunnel widening, fractures, or implant-related complications, were observed. Both procedures provided satisfactory results. The HP procedure provided better reduction, while the MITR procedure provided a slightly lower tendency of pain. Long-term follow-up is needed to investigate the clinical outcomes and radiological outcomes of both groups.

Clinical Outcome of a Modified Coracoid Tunnel-Free Coracoclavicular Sling Technique With Remnant Preservation for the Treatment of High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Report of 48 Cases With 2 to 5 Years of Follow-up

BACKGROUND

High-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation injuries (Rockwood type IV or V) are surgically indicated because of complete disruption of the AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments, leading to instability and pain. In surgical techniques that require a suspensory system, coracoid tunnel-related complications are not uncommon.

PURPOSE

To report subjective and objective clinical outcomes and complication rates of a modified coracoid tunnel-free CC sling technique combined with CC ligament remnant preservation for a minimum 2-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and January 2017, we prospectively enrolled patients who underwent a modified CC sling technique performed by 1 senior surgeon using the AC TightRope System in a coracoid tunnel-free fashion. The CC distance (CCD) and Rockwood AC joint classification were evaluated on radiographs preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. The visual analog pain score, range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley score, and University of California Los Angeles score were recorded preoperatively and at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 48 of 54 patients (88.9%) were included for the evaluation with a mean ± SD follow-up of 39.3 ± 8.9 months (range, 24.7-64.3 months). The CCD was significantly decreased from 22.7 ± 4.2 to 9.8 ± 2.3 mm (P < .01) immediately after surgery and to 11.2 ± 1.8 mm (P < .01) at final follow-up. At the final follow-up, the side-to-side difference of CCD was 3.5 ± 0.6 mm. Compared with the preoperative level, all subjective evaluations were significantly improved at the final follow-up. We observed that 4 of the 48 patients (8.3%) had a loss of reduction at the final follow-up, but no pain or instability was documented. Further, no coracoid-related complication or other complications were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The coracoid tunnel-free CC sling technique using the AC TightRope System combined with CC ligament remnant preservation demonstrated significant improvement regarding both clinical and radiological outcomes, with a reduction loss rate of 8.3%. It is a safe method that could achieve satisfactory result without any coracoid drilling-related complications.

Acromioclavicular joint separation treated with clavicular hook plate: a study of radiological and functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION

ACJ separation is a common shoulder injury. A variety of surgical techniques for high-grade ACJ separations have been described. A commonly used technique represents open reduction and fixation by a hook plate. Goal of the present study was to evaluate radiographic and functional outcome in patients with high-grade ACJ separations following surgical treatment with a hook plate before and after surgery as well as after hook plate removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery with a hook plate due to traumatic ACJ separation between 2012 and 2014 were included and examined during a follow-up control. Demographic and clinical data as well as radiographs pre- and postoperatively were evaluated. Additionally, range of motion, DASH Score and Constant-Murley Score (CMS) were analysed in a follow-up examination. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman's rank correlation were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

99 patients (88 m/11 w, 44 y) were included in the present study. 69 (64 m/5 w, 49 y) could be examined during long-term follow-up (38 month). After hook plate removal, the CCD increased significantly (13.7 ± 0.9 mm) compared to the hook plate in situ (9.9 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.000001). 68% of all patients achieved a full range of motion post-operatively. Main limitations of range of motion affected external rotation as well as ante-/retroversion. Mean DASH Score was 5.6 ± 1 points and CMS 90.0 ± 1.4 points.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to a significant higher CCD after hook plate removal, nearly all patients achieved good to excellent functional results for DASH and CMS. This indicates that loss of reduction does not necessarily lead to poor functional outcome after ACJ separation surgery.

Functional and Radiographic Outcomes of Intraoperatively Decreasing the Coracoclavicular Distance to 50% of the Unaffected Side in Stabilization of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Retrospective Evaluation

Background:

The postoperative failure rate of acromioclavicular (AC) joint fixation using the coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization technique is high. Studies have reported that compared with normal intraoperative anatomic reduction, intraoperative overreduction of the AC joint is more successful in achieving a satisfactory anatomic radiographic outcome at 1- to 2-year follow-up.

Purpose:

To evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes and complications in patients with acute AC joint injury who underwent combined CC stabilization and AC capsular repair in which the CC distance was intraoperatively decreased to 50% of the unaffected side.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

In this retrospective study, we collected and analyzed the data of patients with an acute AC joint injury (Rockwood type 5) who underwent combined CC stabilization and AC capsular repair during which the CC distance was decreased 50% compared with the unaffected side. At 2-year follow-up, we evaluated functional outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score), radiographic outcomes (alignment of the AC joint in the vertical and horizontal planes, tunnel widening), and complications (infection, clavicular fracture).

Results:

The study included 20 patients with a mean ± SD age of 42.20 ± 10.10 years. The mean follow-up period was 33.75 ± 11.50 months. At the 2-year follow-up, the mean ASES score was 95.13 ± 5.61. The overreduction alignment, anatomic alignment, and loss reduction alignment rates were 0% (0/20 patients), 95% (19/20 patients), and 5% (1/ 20 patients), respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in the mean CC distance between the affected and unaffected sides on radiographic evaluation. The mean medial clavicular tunnel width and lateral clavicular tunnel width were 5.03 ± 0.68 mm and 4.47 ± 0.67 mm, respectively. None of the patients experienced fractures or infections.

Conclusion:

Excellent functional and radiographic outcomes and no complications were seen at 2-year follow-up in patients with acute AC joint injury who underwent combined CC stabilization and AC capsular repair with the CC distance intraoperatively decreased to 50% of the unaffected side.

Is coracoclavicular reconstruction necessary in hook plate fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation?

Background

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is a relatively common shoulder injury. For the treatment of cases of severe ACJ dislocation (Rockwood type III–V), hook plate fixation is an easy-to-master and minimally-invasive approach to surgical intervention. Over stress on the acromion following hook plate fixation often leads to acromial complications such as osteolysis and loss of reduction. We hypothesized that suspensory reconstruction alongside hook plate fixation might provide a superior stability and reduce complications as compared with hook plate fixation alone. The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of these two surgical modalities.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 49 patients with acute ACJ dislocation from May 2010 to December 2018. Among them, 19 patients received hook plate fixation only (HP group), and 19 underwent concomitant hook plate fixation and loop suspension fixation with two mersilene sutures (HM group). The demographic data of the patients were recorded and analyzed. All patients underwent a shoulder X-ray initially, immediately postoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months to measure the relative coracoclavicular distance (rCCD). Clinical assessment of shoulder function outcome was conducted using the Constant Murley Score (CMS); the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score was also measured at the latest follow-up.

Results

There were no significant differences in the demographic data between the two groups. With regards to the CMS and the UCLA score, the HM group and HP group both had excellent outcomes, and no significant differences in scores were observed between groups (CMS: 93.90 ± 6.16 versus 94.47 ± 7.26, p = 0.47; UCLA score: 32.84 ± 2.91 versus 34.32 ± 1.16, p = 0.07). However, the HM group demonstrated substantial superiority in terms of maintenance of the rCCD over the HP group (91.47 ± 27.47 versus 100.75 ± 48.70, p = 0.015). In addition, there was less subacromial osteolysis in the HM group than the HP group (52.6% versus 15.8%, p = 0.038).

Conclusion

Both fixations yielded excellent functional outcomes. However, concomitant hook plate fixation with loop suspensory reconstruction demonstrated the fewer acromion complications and statistical differences in reduction maintenance with less clinical significance.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To provide a comprehensive summary of available literature on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for various shoulder conditions and outcomes and to identify factors that influence these metrics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past 2 years, there has been an increasing interest in utilizing MCID, SCB, and PASS as a gauge to evaluate the success of an intervention for shoulder conditions. Efforts at calculating these thresholds have yielded multiple and inconsistent values and are further compounded by the proliferation of different PROMs in the shoulder literature. The MCID, SCB, and PASS values of shoulder PROMs vary widely with study-specific characteristics, including patient demographics, shoulder pathology, treatment, shoulder instrument, study methodology, and calculation method. The differences in these factors are not inconsequential and could lead to large discrepancies in threshold values. It is crucial that clinicians are mindful of these variables when designing future studies to calculate these metrics or when utilizing previously published values to determine the success of an intervention.

Dislocations of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint in children and adolescents: A retrospective clinical study and big data analysis of routine data

Background

Dislocations of the sternoclavicular joint (anterior/posterior) and acromioclavicular joint (SCJ and ACJ, respectively) are rare injuries in childhood/adolescence, each having its own special characteristics. In posterior SCJ dislocation, the concomitant injuries in the upper mediastinum are most important complication, while in anterior SCJ dislocation there is a risk of permanent or recurrent instability.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis from seven pediatric trauma centers under the leadership of the Section of Pediatric Traumatology of the German Trauma Society, children (<18 years) were analyzed with focus on age, gender, trauma mechanism, diagnostics, treatment strategy and follow-up results. Additional epidemiological big data analysis from routine data was done.

Results

In total 24 cases with an average age of 14.4 years (23 boys, 1 girl) could be evaluated (7x ACJ dislocation type ≥ Rockwood III; 17x SCJ dislocation type Allman III, including 12 posterior). All ACJ dislocations were treated surgically. Postoperative immobilization lasted 3–6 weeks, after which a movement limit of 90 degrees was recommended until implant removal. Patients with SCJ dislocation were posterior dislocations in 75%, and 15 of 17 were treated surgically. One patient had a tendency toward sub-dislocation and another had a relapse. Conservatively treated injuries healed without complications. Compared to adults, SCJ injuries were equally rarely found in children (< 1% of clavicle-associated injuries), while pediatric ACJ dislocations were significantly less frequent (p<0.001).

Conclusions

In cases of SCJ dislocations, our cohort analysis confirmed both the heterogeneous spectrum of the treatment strategies in addition to the problems/complications based on previous literature. The indication for the operative or conservative approach and for the specific method is not standardized. In order to be able to create evidence-based standards, a prospective, multicenter-study with a sufficiently long follow-up time would be necessary due to the rarity of these injuries in children. The rarity was emphasized by our routine data analysis.

Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint dislocations indicate severe concomitant thoracic and upper extremity injuries in severely injured patients

Preliminary studies show that clavicle fractures (CF) are known as an indicator in the severely injured for overall injury severity that are associated with relevant concomitant injuries in the thorax and upper extremity. In this regard, little data is available for the rarer injuries of the sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints (SCJ and ACJ, respectively). Our study will answer whether clavicular joint injuries (CJI), by analogy, have a similar relevance for the severely injured. We performed an analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU (TR-DGU). The inclusion criterion was an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of at least 16. In the TR-DGU, the CJI were registered as one entity. The CJI group was compared with the CF and control groups (those without any clavicular injuries). Concomitant injuries were distinguished using the Abbreviated Injury Scale according to their severity. The inclusion criteria were met by n = 114,595 patients. In the case of CJI, n = 1228 patients (1.1%) were found to be less severely injured than the controls in terms of overall injury severity. Compared to the CF group (n = 12,030; 10.5%) with higher ISS than the controls, CJI cannot be assumed as an indicator for a more severe trauma; however, CF can. Concomitant injuries were more common for severe thoracic and moderate upper extremity injuries than other body parts for CJI. This finding confirms our hypothesis that CJI could be an indicator of further specific severe concomitant injuries. Despite the rather lower relevance of the CJI in the cohort of severely injured with regard to the overall injury severity, these injuries have their importance in relation to the indicator effect for thoracic concomitant injuries and concomitant injuries of the upper extremity. A limitation is the collective registration of SCJ and ACJ injuries as one entity in the TR-DGU. A distorted picture of the CJI in favor of ACJ injuries could arise from the significantly higher incidence of the ACJ dislocation compared to the SCJ. Therefore, these two injury entities should be recorded separately in the future, and prospective studies should be carried out in order to derive a standardized treatment strategy for the care of severely injured with the respective CJI.

Comparison between hook plate fixation with and without coracoclavicular ligament suture for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations

BACKGROUND

Hook plates are widely used for repair of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. However, it is unclear whether repair of torn coracoclavicular (CC) ligament is necessary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the hook plate fixation with direct CC ligament repair for acute ACJ dislocation in comparison with the hook plate fixation without direct CC ligament repair.

METHODS

The study included 120 patients with acute ACJ dislocations who underwent surgery. The patients were divided into 73 patient groups with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) hook plate fixation and direct CC ligament repair and 47 patient groups without direct CC ligament repair. For clinical assessments, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, constant score, and time for implant removal were recorded. The corcoclavicular distance (CCD) and the CCD ratio were used for the evaluation of reduction. Typical reported complications, such as secondary dislocation, implant failure or loosening, peri-implant fracture, acromion osteolysis, and postoperative ACJ arthrosis, were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. There was no difference in the timing of implant removal between the two groups. The last follow-up CCD was not statistically significant between group with direct CC ligament repair and without repair (9.1 ± 3.3 vs. 9.0 ± 2.8, respectively, p > 0.05). The last follow-up CCD ratio showed significant differences between the two groups (12.6 ± 25.5% vs. 26.3 ± 39.7, respectively, p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The hook plate fixation with direct CC ligament repair group was better for maintenance of reduction than that of the hook plate fixation without direct CC ligament repair group. Although, there were no differences of clinical outcomes and complications between two groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective Study.

Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Ligament Stabilization Using Coracoid Cortical Suspension in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury; Precision of Drill Tunnel

Acute acromioclavicular joint separation is a common injury of the shoulder. There are several methods for treating this condition; however, there is no gold standard established. Herein, we propose an arthroscopic method for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint separation using a simple cortical suspension device at the coracoid base via a transclavicular-transcoracoidal tunnel and tieing the suture at the clavicle. This method has the advantages of making a precision drilling tunnel using small implants and small stab incisions, with better cosmetic results and less implant irritation.

Arthroscopic Suture-Button Versus Hook-Plate Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries-A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

Purpose

To systematically review the comparative studies in the literature to compare joint stability, clinical outcomes, and complications of acromioclavicular joint fixation using a hook plate versus arthroscopic suture-button (SB) fixation.

Methods

A literature search was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to identify clinical studies comparing the hook plate and arthroscopic SB techniques for acromioclavicular joint injuries. Qualitative statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, and a P value of ≤.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Six clinical studies including 285 patients were included in the systematic review. In 3 of the studies, there was a significant difference in favor of SB for Constant score. Patients treated with the SB technique had a lower visual analog scale score at final follow-up in 2 of the 4 studies that measured this outcome. In addition, there were no significant difference in the rate of complications, revisions, or joint malreduction in any of the included studies.

Conclusions

The arthroscopic SB procedure resulted in lower postoperative pain scores, and improved postoperative functional outcomes, although this was not a clinically significant difference. In addition, there were no significant differences in the rate of complications, revisions, or joint malreduction.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review of Level I, II, and III studies.

Early clinical results of minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction can be maintained at a minimum of five years' follow-up

AIMS

There is a lack of long-term data for minimally invasive acromioclavicular (AC) joint repair. Furthermore, it is not clear if good early clinical results can be maintained over time. The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of minimally invasive AC joint reconstruction (MINAR) and compare it to corresponding short-term data.

METHODS

We assessed patients with a follow-up of at least five years after minimally invasive flip-button repair for high-grade AC joint dislocation. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the Constant score and a questionnaire. Ultrasound determined the coracoclavicular (CC) distance. Results of the current follow-up were compared to the short-term results of the same cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients (three females, 47 males) were successfully followed up for a minimum of five years. The mean follow-up was 7.7 years (63 months to 132 months). The overall Constant score was 94.4 points (54 to 100) versus 97.7 points (83 to 100) for the contralateral side showing a significant difference for the operated shoulder (p = 0.013) The mean difference in the CC distance between the operated and the contralateral shoulder was 3.7 mm (0.2 to 7.8; p = 0.010). In total, 16% (n = 8) of patients showed recurrent instability. All these cases were performed within the first 16 months after introduction of this technique. A total of 84% (n = 42) of the patients were able to return to their previous occupations and sport activities. Comparison of short-term and long-term results revealed no significant difference for the Constant Score (p = 0.348) and the CC distance (p = 0.974).

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcome of MINAR is good to excellent after long-term follow-up and no significant differences were found compared to short-term results. We therefore suggest this is a reliable technique for surgical treatment of high-grade AC joint dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):918-924.

Editorial Commentary: Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction. Double Up It Is?

More than 100 surgical techniques have been described for the reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligament complex. None of the techniques appears superior, but double-button fixation for acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations has become an attractive option. The clinical outcomes are good to excellent, and the return to physical activity and sport is above 90%. However, complications such as loss of reduction and tunnel widening have been described and can reach up to 80%. The load to failure of the native coracoclavicular complex is more than 600 N, and any surgical technique must surpass this figure. Single-button and loop techniques do not always sufficiently stabilize the acromioclavicular joint. Even double- and triple-button techniques may not restore vertical and horizontal stability of the acromioclavicular joint to its native normal state. Double-button technique restores both scapula and clavicular rotation closest to the native state, but still has lower stiffness and results in higher superior-inferior translation, which could cause ongoing vertical instability.

Suture Button Versus Hook Plate for Acute Unstable Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment is indicated for unstable acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. The hook plate (HP) technique is a commonly used treatment method, but the use of the suture button (SB) technique is increasing.

PURPOSE

To conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating patient outcomes between the SB and HP techniques for acute unstable AC joint dislocation.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A literature search of the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Cohort studies and case-control studies comparing the SB and HP procedures for acute unstable AC joint dislocation were included. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan (v 5.3.5).

RESULTS

Eight clinical studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified and included a total of 204 patients treated with the SB technique and 195 patients with the HP technique. Patients treated with the SB technique had a higher Constant score (mean difference [MD], 3.95; 95% CI, 1.20-6.70; P = .005) and a lower visual analog scale pain score (MD, -0.75; 95% CI, -1.12 to 0.37; P < .0001) when compared with the HP technique. No significant differences in operation time (MD, -0.38; 95% CI, -7.14 to 6.37; P = .91), coracoclavicular distance (MD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.35; P = .75), complications (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.22-1.54; P = .28), and loss of reduction (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% CI, 0.66-9.83; P = .17) were found between the SB and HP techniques. The subgroup analysis showed that the arthroscopic SB technique resulted in a higher Constant score (MD, 6.75; 95% CI, 4.21-9.29; P < .00001) as compared with the HP technique, but no differences were observed between the open SB and HP techniques (MD, 0.69; 95% CI, -0.82 to 2.20; P = .37).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that the SB technique resulted in better functional outcomes and a reduced visual analog scale pain score when compared with the HP technique. However, for operation time, coracoclavicular distance, complications, and loss of reduction, there were no statistically significant differences between the techniques. Compared with the open procedure, arthroscopic SB may be superior for better functional outcomes.

Coracoid clavicular tunnel angle is related with loss of reduction in a single-tunnel coracoclavicular fixation using a dog bone button in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

PURPOSE

Despite the high failure rates of techniques used to maintain the reduction of single-tunnel coracoclavicular (CC) fixation, analyses of the etiology of loss of reduction related to surgical techniques are limited. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the initial coracoclavicular tunnel angle was related to loss of reduction in the single-tunnel technique for AC joint dislocation. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic single-tunnel CC suture button fixation according to the initial coracoclavicular tunnel angle.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic single-tunnel CC suture button fixation for AC joint dislocation from 2014 to 2018 were enrolled. The tunneling-first technique was used in the first 11 patients, while the reduction-first technique was used in the remaining 22 consecutive patients. For clinical assessments, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Korean Shoulder Score (KSS) were recorded. For radiological evaluation, coracoclavicular distance ratio, coracoclavicular tunnel angle, coracoid, and clavicular tunnel widths were measured.

RESULTS

The ASES score did not differ significantly between the two groups (n.s.). However, the KSS was significantly better in the reduction-first group (p = 0.031). No significant intergroup differences were observed in the pre- and postoperative coracoclavicular distance ratio. However, at the last follow-up, loss of coracoclavicular distance ratio was significantly smaller in the reduction-first group (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, loss of the coracoclavicular distance ratio was positively correlated with the postoperative coracoclavicular tunnel angle (p < 0.001, Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = 0.602). The final follow-up clavicular tunnel width was also significantly smaller in the reduction-first group (p = 0.002). Finally, the last follow-up clavicular tunnel width was positively correlated with the postoperative coracoclavicular tunnel angle (p = 0.008, Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = 0.459).

CONCLUSION

The reduction-first technique showed better clinical and radiological outcomes than the tunneling-first technique in single-tunnel CC fixation for AC joint dislocation. A large postoperative coracoclavicular tunnel angle was associated with loss of reduction and clavicular tunnel widening. Therefore, obtaining a straight coracoclavicular tunnel angle is crucial for achieving better outcomes and minimizing loss of reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of clavicular hook plate with and without coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of clavicular hook plate fixation with and without coracoclavicular (CC) tape augmentation for the treatment of acute unstable AC dislocation.

Methods

We treated 47 patients (31 men and 16 women; mean age: 47 years (range, 21–81)) with unstable acute AC dislocations (Rockwood III–V) and divided them into two groups according to the treatment modality, with hook plate fixation (hook plate group) or hook plate plus CC tape augmentation (combined group). We assessed radiologic findings, such as subacromial osteolysis and AC osteoarthritis. We also evaluated the clinical outcomes using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, as well as the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score.

Results

We found that the combined group had less subacromial osteolysis upon radiography, although the CC distance was similar in both groups (119 ± 29.7% of contralateral side CC distance in hook plate group versus 119 ± 34.8% in the combined group, p = 0.77). Compared with the hook plate group, the combined group had a lower VAS score (4.5 ± 2.3 in hook plate group versus 2.3 ± 1.4 in the combined group, p < 0.001), better UCLA scores (19.9 ± 4.9 in hook plate group versus 27.2 ± 4.0 in the combined group, p < 0.001) as well as better ASES scores (51.9 ± 17.8 in hook plate group versus 73.8 ± 13.1 in the combined group, p < 0.001) at 3 and 6 months after surgery.

Conclusion

Hook plate fixation plus CC tape augmentation may prevent subacromial osteolysis and yield better short-term functional outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level III, Therapeutic Study.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Dislocation of the Acromioclavicular Joint

BACKGROUND

The acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is one of the more common sites of shoulder girdle injury, accounting for 4-12% of all such injuries, with an incidence of 3-4 cases per 100 000 persons per year in the general population. Current topics of debate include the proper standard diagnostic evaluation, the indications for surgery, and the best operative method.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search.

RESULTS

Mechanical trauma of the ACG can tear the ligamentous apparatus that holds the acromion, clavicle, and coracoid process together. Different interventions are indicated depending on the nature of the injury. In recent years, the horizontal component of the instability has received more attention, in addition to its vertical component. Persistent instability can lead to chronic, painful limitation of shoulder function, particularly with respect to working above the head. Surgical stabilization is therefore recommended for high-grade instability of Rockwood types IV and V. Modern reconstruction techniques enable selective vertical and horizontal treatment of the instability and have been found superior to traditional methods, particularly in young athletes. Arthroscopic techniques are advantageous because they are less invasive, do not require removal of implanted material, and afford the opportunity to diagnose any accompanying lesions definitively and to treat them if necessary. Surgery for acute injuries should be performed within three weeks of the trauma. For chronic injuries, additional tendon augmentation is now considered standard treatment.

CONCLUSION

High-grade ACJ instability is a complex and significant injury of the shoulder girdle that can cause persistent pain and functional impairment. The state of the evidence regarding its optimal treatment is weak. Large-scale, prospective, randomized comparative studies are needed in order to define a clear standard of treatment.

Different treatment strategies for acromioclavicular dislocation injuries: a nationwide survey on open/minimally invasive and arthroscopic concepts

Background

Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are one of the most common among sporting injuries of the upper extremity. Several studies investigated different treatment options comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment, and type of operative interventions. This study aims to evaluate treatment decisions regarding injuries of the AC joint and to compare different treatment strategies depending on the specific training of the treating physician.

Methods

We performed a nationwide survey by contacting different experienced physicians and sending them questionnaires. The questionnaire included 37 questions that assessed preferred treatment strategies in AC joint injuries. We addressed different surgical and nonsurgical options as well as level of experience and factors that might influence the decision on treatment strategy. The physicians were stratified according to their training into general surgeons (group trauma associated) and orthopedic surgeons (orthopedic associated). The AC joint lesions were categorized according to the widely used Rockwood classification.

Results

This study analyses 96 questionnaires. We included 46 (47.9%) colleagues in group trauma and 50 (52.1%) in group orthopedics. Most of the colleagues (98.9%) prefer non-operative treatment of type I and type II AC lesions. Similarly, 96.8% agree on surgical treatment of types IV, V, and VI lesions. The treatment of type III lesions is performed in 41.6% of cases non-operatively and in 58.4% of cases surgically. Trauma-associated colleagues are 3.4 times more likely to treat AC lesions with a hook plate compared to orthopedic-associated colleagues (p = 0.05). In decreasing order, the most commonly used non-surgical technique is sling immobilization (63.7%), and the most commonly performed surgical treatment is the hook plate (41.1%) in treating type III injuries.

Conclusion

This study shows a distinct difference in treatment of AC joint injuries depending on the training of the physician. Further, the need for high-quality studies arises to define the optimal treatment of type III lesions.