Dynamic Stabilization of Syndesmosis Injuries Reduces Complications and Reoperations as Compared With Screw Fixation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Outcome of flexible fixation for acute isolated syndesmotic injuries

BACKGROUND

Management of syndesmotic injuries with screw fixation has potential disadvantages, which may lead to the loss of some of the ankle functions. The use of the suture-button system instead can overcome these disadvantages.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective study, 32 patients with acute isolated syndesmotic injuries were treated with a suture-button device. Follow-up was for a minimum of 2 years, regarding the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, patient satisfaction at 3, 12, and 24 months, and radiological assessment.

RESULT

A significant improvement regarding pain (VAS during rest 5.6 and during walking 6.1 preoperative improved to 0.1 and 0.2 postoperatively, respectively. (P values were < 0.0001 for both pain during rest and walking) and AOFAS score (improved significantly from 44 ± 7.5 pre- to 99 ± 8.7 points postoperatively (P value was 0.0034). The improved VAS and AOFAS scores of the repaired ankles gradually reached the values of the contralateral uninjured ankle (evaluated at 3,12, and 24 months, postoperatively). Radiographs and CT of both ankles - repaired and healthy ankles - were similar at the 3 months follow-up. Early full weight-bearing and early return to work and sport characterized all patients. There was no need for hardware removal.

CONCLUSION

Suture-button treatment for acute isolated ankle syndesmotic injuries leads to favorable clinical and radiological outcomes. Postoperative radiographs and CT denoted maintained ankle stability. Patients can do early full weight-bearing and early return to work and sport.

Acute Ankle Diastasis Injuries Treated with Dynamic, Static Fixation or Anatomic Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Comparison Studies

BACKGROUND

Acute ankle diastasis injuries are complex and debilitating. These injuries occur when the syndesmotic complex becomes compromised. Treatments of acute syndesmotic injuries include static fixation with screws, dynamic fixation with an elastic device, or anatomic repair of the damaged ligament. However, there is disagreement over which method is most effective. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the 3 treatment methods for acute syndesmotic injuries.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on Embase and PubMed. Studies that compared at least 2 groups with relevant American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), reoperation rate, and complication (implant failure, implant irritation, and infection) data were analyzed. Statistical analysis for this study was performed using Review Manager 5.4, with a standard p-value of ≤0.05 for statistical significance.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies including a total of 1,059 patients (452 dynamic, 529 static, and 78 anatomic) were included for analysis. Dynamic fixation had significantly higher mean AOFAS scores at 3 months postoperation by 5.12 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-9.96, p = 0.04) as well as at 1 year postoperation by 4.64 points (95% CI, 1.74-7.55, p = 0.002) than static fixation. Anatomic repair had significantly higher AOFAS scores at 6 months postoperation by 3.20 points (95% CI, 1.06-5.34, p = 0.003) and 1 year postoperation by 1.86 points (95% CI, 0.59-3.14, p = 0.004) than static fixation. Dynamic fixation had significantly higher AOFAS scores at 6 months postoperation by 2.81 points (95% CI, 0.76-4.86, p = 0.007), 12 months postoperation by 3.17 points (95% CI, 0.76-5.58, p = 0.01), and at 2 years postoperation by 5.56 points (95% CI, 3.80-7.32, p < 0.001) than anatomic repair. Dynamic fixation also had a lower VAS score average (favorable), only significant at 12 months postoperation, than static fixation by 0.7 points (95% CI -0.99 to -0.40, p < 0.001). Anatomic repair did not have significant difference in VAS scores compared with static fixation. Anatomic repair had significantly lower VAS scores at 12 months postoperation by 0.32 points (95% CI -0.59 to -0.05, p = 0.02) than dynamic fixation. Dynamic fixation had significantly less implant failures (odds ratio [OR], 0.13, 95% CI, 0.05-0.32, p < 0.001) than static fixation. Anatomic repair was not significantly different from static fixation in the complication metrics. Dynamic fixation and anatomic repair were not significantly different in the complication metrics either. Dynamic fixation had a significantly lower reoperation rate than static fixation (OR, 0.23, 95% CI, 0.09-0.54, p < 0.001). Anatomic repair did not have a significantly different reoperation rate compared with static fixation. However, dynamic fixation had a significantly lower reoperation rate than anatomic repair (OR, 4.65, 95% CI, 1.10-19.76, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Dynamic fixation seems to demonstrate superior early clinical outcomes. However, these advantages become negligible in the long term when compared with alternative options. Dynamic fixation is associated with a lower risk for complications, specifically seen with the decrease in implant failures. This method also presents a significantly lower reoperation rate compared with the other treatment approaches. Apart from showing improved early clinical outcomes in comparison with static fixation, anatomic repair did not have significant distinctions in other metrics, including complications or reoperation rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of Distal Tibiofibular Destabilization and Syndesmosis Compression on the Flexibility Kinematics of the Ankle Bones: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model

Background

Overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis during open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fracture may affect multidirectional flexibility of the ankle bones.

Methods

Ten cadaveric lower limbs (78.3±13.0 years, 4 female, 6 male) underwent biomechanical testing in sagittal, coronal, and axial rotation with degrees of motion quantified. The intact force (100%) was the force needed to compress the syndesmosis just beyond the intact position, and overcompression was defined as 150% of the intact force. After intact testing, the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), interosseus membrane (IOM), and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) were sectioned and testing was repeated. The IOM and AITFL were reconstructed in sequence and tested at 100% and 150% compression.

Results

Overcompression of the syndesmosis did not significantly reduce ROM of the ankle bones for any loading modality (P > .05). IOM+AITFL reconstruction restored distal tibiofibular axial rotation to the intact condition. Axial rotation motion was significantly lower with AITFL fixation compared with IOM fixation alone (P < .05). The proximal tibiofibular syndesmosis demonstrated significantly higher motion in axial rotation with all distal reconstruction conditions.

Conclusion

As assessed by direct visualization, overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis did not reduce ROM of the ankle bones. Distal tibiofibular axial rotation was significantly lower with IOM+AITFL fixation compared with IOM augmentation alone. Distal tibiofibular axial rotation did not differ significantly from the intact condition after combined IOM+AITFL fixation. Dynamic fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis resulted in increased axial rotation at the proximal tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Clinical Relevance

These biomechanical data suggest that inadvertent overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis when fixing ankle fractures does not restrict subsequent ankle bone ROM. The AITFL is an important stabilizer of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in external rotation.

Level of Evidence

controlled laboratory study.

A Lateral Extra-articular Procedure Reduces the Failure Rate of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Without Increasing Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lateral extra-articular procedures are becoming increasingly popular in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, especially in patients with persistent rotatory instability and in a high-risk population. However, few studies have investigated the outcomes of the lateral extra-articular procedure as an associated procedure in an ACL revision (R-ACLR) setting and its benefit with respect to isolated intra-articular reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

Lateral extra-articular procedures reduce the failure rate of revision ACL reconstruction (R-ACLR).

PURPOSE

To compare subjective outcomes, knee stability, and failure and complication rates between patients who underwent ACL revision with and without an associated lateral extra-articular procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and OVID databases was performed on September 2022 in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Eligible studies were trials directly comparing patients who had isolated ACL revision with patients who had ACL revision associated with lateral extra-articular procedures at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A meta-analysis was performed, and bias and the quality of the evidence were rated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included: a total of 334 patients were treated with isolated revision (isolated (R-ACLR)) and 342 treated with combined revision and a lateral extra-articular procedure (combined (R-ACLR)). For the failure rate, the meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased relative risk reduction of 54% (P = .004) in patients with combined (R-ACLR) with respect to isolated R-ACL, whereas no difference in complication rate was observed. The combined (R-ACLR) group demonstrated a decreased risk ratio of 50% (P = .002) for having a positive pivot-shift test result and a relative risk reduction of 68% (P = .003) for having a grade 2-3 pivot shift when compared with the isolated (R-ACLR) group. Finally, no significant differences were observed among the lateral extra-articular procedures.

CONCLUSION

The addition of a lateral extra-articular procedure to revision ACL significantly reduced the failure rate and postoperative pivot shift without increasing the complication rate. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction and a lateral extra-articular procedure with iliotibial band were effective in improving the outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction. Further high-level studies could help to clarify which subgroup of patients could particularly benefit from an anterolateral procedure in the context of ACL revision.

Chronic syndesmotic instability - Current evidence on management

This review article discusses the current evidence on the management of chronic syndesmotic instability. Conservative treatment has a limited role, and surgical intervention is most commonly reported as the mainstay of treatment, however the literature consists of small case series and descriptions of operative techniques, and thus the evidence base for any treatment is weak. Surgical options include arthroscopic debridement alone, static fixation with cortical screws, dynamic fixation with suture-button devices, and ligamentous repair or augmentation.

Center-Center Surgical Technique With Dynamic Syndesmosis Fixation: A Cadaveric Pilot Study

The objective of this cadaveric biomechanical study was to evaluate if the center-center surgical technique is a reliable and repeatable method of achieving proper syndesmotic reduction when using dynamic syndesmotic fixation. Nine fresh frozen above-knee cadaveric lower extremities were used. Computerized tomography (CT) scans were first obtained for each intact specimen as the baseline for comparison. A simulated complete syndesmotic disruption was created by transection of all deltoid and syndesmotic ligaments. Instability of the ankle was confirmed with stress imaging using fluoroscopy. Each unstable specimen was repaired using the center-center surgical technique with dynamic syndesmosis fixation. A series of measurements from the axial CT images of intact and repaired specimens were used to determine the anatomic distal tibiofibular relationships for comparison of changes from intact to postfixation. All radiographic measurements were performed by 4 independent foot and ankle surgeons. The level of inter-rater reliability for all the measurements was found to be "moderate" to "excellent" agreement (ICC value: 0.865-0.983, 95% confidence interval: 0.634-0.996). There was no statistical difference found between rotational alignment of native and postfixation (a/b: p = .843; b-a: p = .125; θ: p = .062). There was a statistical difference detected for lateral alignment at the center of fibularis incisura between native and postfixation (average: -0.6 ± 0.8 mm, range: -2.3 to 1.2 mm, p < .001). There was no statistical difference found for the anteroposterior translation alignment between native and postfixation (d/e: p = .251; f: p = .377). This study demonstrated the use of the center-center surgical technique as a viable and repeatable method for achieving anatomical reduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis when used with dynamic fixation modalities.

Maisonneuve fracture treated with suture-button system stabilization combined with plate and arthroscopic assistance (SBPAA): Clinical and radiological evaluation in short-medium period

The aim of this study was to estimate the time needed for patients with Maisonneuve fractures to return to routine activities, after treatment with a suture-button system stabilization combined with plate and arthroscopic assistance (SBPAA).

Methods

The study included 13 patients treated at our surgical department from January 2018 to June2022. Specific radiographical follow-up and periodic checks were performed in a short -to-medium term period, to evaluate syndesmosis evolution and tibiofibular overlap with medial clear space (MCS).

Results

Progressive recovery and improvement were observed during follow-up from both radiographic and clinical perspective. Data showed that patients were able to return to full weight-bearing walking around the ninth week and to sport activities in 7.5 months. Long-term complications associated with residual joint stiffness, complex regional pain syndrome, or wound complications were observed in three patients.

Conclusions

Intraoperative arthroscopy represent a valid diagnostic tool to better recognize and evaluate osteochondral lesions in case of syndesmosys. The study demonstrates the importance of intraoperative arthroscopy for recognizing and treating associated osteochondral lesions with proper syndesmosis evaluation. Plate associated to double TightRope represent valid solution to functionally fix and reduce fractures. Additionally, it imitates the normal syndesmosis's anatomy and provides elasticity and robustness, guaranteeing a rapid return to sporting activity. Data and casuistry support these findings.

Early versus late weight-bearing in operatively treated ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Over the past 30 years, several studies have compared early weight-bearing versus late weight-bearing following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures; however, no review strictly including patients with ankle fractures and complete syndesmotic disruption has been performed.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to compare early versus late weight-bearing following surgery for ankle fracture with syndesmotic injury regarding clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was applied to the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed databases from their inception to the 17th of January 2022. The articles were screened independently by two blinded reviewers. Data were extracted by one author, then cross-checked and approved by the other.

RESULTS

No comparative studies were found; therefore, studies describing either early or late weight-bearing were included. It was thus not possible to perform a meta-analysis. 11 studies and 751 patients were included. An early partial weight-bearing protocol was used in three studies (253 patients) and late in eight studies (498 patients). Functional outcomes suggested that there were no clear differences between early partial weight-bearing and late weight-bearing. The reoperation rate was 9-31% in the early group and 0-11% in the late. Similar results were seen for loss of syndesmotic reduction, malreduction, infection, and fixation failure.

CONCLUSION

Pros and cons were reported for early partial weight-bearing and late weight-bearing, but the evidence was very limited as our results were based on noncomparative studies. In the future, high-quality comparative studies focusing on functional outcomes within 6 months postoperatively are needed.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

1.

Arthroscopically assisted internal fixation for treatment of acute ankle fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) allows for the assessment of joint congruity following anatomic reduction, identification of occult intra-articular lesions, and treatment of traumatic intra-articular pathologies. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide evidence on whether ARIF is an alternative treatment protocol for ankle fractures.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched independently by two investigators from the inception dates to October 9, 2022, for comparative studies. The risk-of-bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for Randomized Controlled Trials and the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) were used for assessing the methodological quality. Outcomes were evaluated in terms of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, post-operative complications, arthroscopic findings, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and operation time. Cochrane Review Manager Software 5.4 was used to perform the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 trials involving 755 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that ARIF for ankle fractures was superior regarding functional outcomes and VAS scores when compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). No significant difference was noted in the post-operative complication rate and the operation time between the ARIF and ORIF groups. A high incidence of chondral or osteochondral lesions (OCLs), ligamentous injuries, and loose bodies with ankle fractures was found by ankle arthroscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

ARIF for ankle fractures might be beneficial to offer superior functional outcomes and VAS score than ORIF. Orthopedic surgeons should take a high incidence of OCLs and ligamentous injuries into consideration for the treatment of acute ankle fractures. We believe that with the increase in surgical experience, the occurrence of post-operative complications and the extension of operation time will no longer be a potential concern for surgeons.

Salvage of Chronic Syndesmosis Instability: A Retrospective Review With Mid-Term Follow-Up

Malreduced syndesmotic injuries lead to poor outcomes. No consensus exists regarding preferred surgical treatment. This study aims to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing distal tibiofibular arthrodesis or stabilization. Retrospective review identified patients undergoing distal tibiofibular arthrodesis or stabilization between 2003 and 2019. Surgical factors, revision surgeries, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score ankle-hindfoot scores were collected. Radiographs were independently evaluated by 4 surgeons. Seventy patients were included. Mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score scores (n = 33) improved from 48 ± 16 preoperatively to 85 ± 14 (p < .001) at a median follow-up of 31.1 months. Mean Kellgren scores (n = 47) increased from 2.1 ± 1 to 2.5 ± 1 (p < .001) and the mean medial clear space decreased from 3.2 mm ± 0.8 mm to 2.8 mm ± 0.8 mm (p <.001) with no differences between the arthrodesis and stabilization groups. Zero patients progressed to arthroplasty or fusion. Patients demonstrated significant functional improvement after distal tibiofibular arthrodesis and stabilization. Progression of arthritis, while statistically significant, was not clinically significant.

Comparison of Suture Button and Syndesmotic Screw for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

The syndesmotic screw (SS) and suture button (SB) fixation methods are both widely used for the reduction of ankle syndesmotic injury, with varying outcomes.

Purpose

To review recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the outcomes between SS and SB fixation for ankle syndesmotic injury.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant RCTs published between 1966 and 2021 according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing SS and SB fixation for ankle syndesmotic injury. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Primary outcomes included complications, malreduction, and unplanned reoperation, and secondary outcomes were the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS), and EuroQol-5 Domain (EQ-5D) score. The mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Random- or fixed-effects model was applied according to heterogeneity.

Results

Of 389 studies, 8 RCTs involving 512 patients were included. Overall, 257 patients received SS fixation and 255 patients received SB fixation. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in malreduction (RR, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.07) or EQ-5D (MD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03). However, the SB group showed significant advantages over the SS group in complications (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.66), unplanned reoperation (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.89), AOFAS score (MD, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.77 to 4.31), and OMAS (MD, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.54 to 7.48). The risk of bias of the included studies was acceptable.

Conclusion

The results showed that there were no significant differences between the SS and SB groups in malreduction and EQ-5D scores. However, the SB group had significantly better local irritation rates, unplanned reoperation rates, AOFAS scores, and OMASs.

Acute Syndesmosis Injuries

Ankle syndesmosis injuries include isolated ligamentous rupture, as well as fractures with ligamentous injury. These injuries can significantly affect athletes in all sports, and lead to prolonged recovery and return to sport. Adequate evaluation and diagnosis of these injuries are imperative for treatment and return to play. Many can be treated nonoperatively, but operative treatment is indicated in fractures with syndesmosis disruption and ligamentous injuries with instability. Anatomic reduction and fixation of these injuries will allow functional rehab and return to sport.

Elite Athletes Successfully Return to the Preinjury Level of Sport Following Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively review and report the outcomes of ankle syndesmotic injury management in elite athletes.

DATA SOURCES

Three databases were searched for articles reporting the rate of return to sport following treatment of ankle syndesmotic injuries in elite athletes (collegiate or professional level). Ten articles and 440 athletes were included. Articles reporting the rate of return to sport following high ankle sprain injury in elite athletes. Data collected included demographics, type of treatment received, and return to sport (RTS) information. A random effects model was used.

MAIN RESULTS

The estimated overall rate of RTS was 99% (95% CI, 95.5-99.9). The mean time to RTS was 38 ± 18 (range, 14-137) days. Of the 440 athletes, 269 (269/440%, 61%) were treated nonoperatively (nonoperative group); the rate of RTS was 99.6%, and the athletes returned at a mean time of 29 ± 14 (range, 13-45) days. A total of 171 athletes (171 of 440%, 39%) underwent surgical treatment (operative group). All (171 of 171%, 100%) athletes returned at a mean time of 50.3 ± 13 (range, 41-137) days. Almost all athletes who underwent surgery had suture button fixation (164 of 171 athletes, 96%), and the mean time to RTS was 7 weeks with 9.1% complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Elite athletes with ankle syndesmosis injury return to sport at an extremely high rates, following operative or nonoperative treatment. Return to the preinjury level of competition should be expected at 4 weeks and 7 weeks in high-level athletes who undergo nonoperative and operative management, respectively. Suture button fixation was used by the majority of studies reporting surgical management of ankle syndesmosis injuries in athletes.

Biomechanics comparison between endobutton fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for syndesmotic injury ankle fracture; a finite element analysis and cadaveric validation study

Introduction

Various syndesmotic fixation methods in ankle injury are recommended; however, a lack of biomechanical information persists regarding the stiffness of the fixation methods. The current study thus aimed to assess biomechanical cadaveric validation and perform a finite element analysis of syndesmotic fixation comparing endobutton vs. screw after syndesmotic injury with an ankle fracture.

Method

Five pairs of ankles of fresh cadavers were used for the validity test for Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (AITFL), Posterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (PITFL), and Interosseous ligament biomechanics properties. Four finite element models (FEM) were created: an intact model, a fracture model with/without syndesmotic injury, an endobutton fixation model, and a syndesmotic screw fixation model. Each FEM was tested vis-à-vis external rotation force, anteroposterior translation force, and compression force until model failure. The primary outcomes were stiffness and force until failure.

Result

The respective anteroposterior translation force for the stiffness of the intact model, the screw fixation model, and the endobutton fixation was 8.14, 9.15, and 8.17 N/mm. The respective external rotation force for the stiffness of intact, screw fixation, and endobutton model was 0.927,0.949, and 0.940 Nm/degree. The respective stress under compression force in the intact, screw fixation, and endobutton model was 39.94,25.59, and 37.30 MPa.

Conclusion

Both screw and endobutton fixation models provided more translation, compression, and rotation stability than normal syndesmosis, but the screw model provided greater translation and compression force stability than the endobutton model. There was no difference in rotational stability between the two models. We thus recommend the same rehabilitation protocol for both fixation methods; however, vigorous translation and compression should be avoided when using endobutton fixation.

Comparison of flexible fixation and screw fixation for isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries: A protocol for a meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

The frequency of isolated Lisfranc ligament (ILL) injuries has been increasing recently with the increase in low-energy trauma resulting from sports injuries. For ILL injuries, the optimal method of fixation still remains controversial. The traditional fixation method is achieved by trans-articular screws, but recently, dorsal bridge plates and suture button (SB) fixation have become alternatives. Some biomechanical studies have showed that SB fixation can provide adequate strength compared to trans-articular screws. Therefore, a meta-analysis is imperative to provide evidence on whether flexible fixation is comparable to screw fixation for treatment of ILL injuries.

METHODS

We will conduct a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science databases and for comparative studies. We will apply the risk-of-bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for Randomized Controlled Trials to assess the methodological quality. Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of comparative studies. Statistical analysis will be conducted using RevMan 5.4 software (Cochrane Collaboration, London, England).

RESULTS

This systematic review will evaluate the functional outcomes and radiographic results of flexible fixation for treatment of ILL injuries.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion of this study will provide evidence for judging whether flexible fixation is superior to screw fixation for treatment of ILL injuries.

A systematic review of ankle fracture-dislocations: Recent update and future prospects

Background

Ankle fracture-dislocations are one of the most severe types of ankle injuries. Compared to the simple ankle fractures, ankle fracture-dislocations are usually more severely traumatized and can cause worse functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to review the previous literatures to understand the anatomy, mechanisms, treatment, and functional outcomes associated with ankle fracture-dislocations.

Methods

The available literatures from January 1985 to December 2021 in three main medical databases were searched and analyzed. The detailed information was extracted for each article, such as researchers, age, gender, groups, type of study, type of center research, level of evidence, significant findings, study aim, cause of injury, time from injury to surgery, type of fracture, direction of dislocation, follow-up, postoperative complications and functional evaluation scores.

Results

A total of 15 studies (1,089 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Only one study was a prospective randomized trial. The top-ranked cause of injury was high-energy injury (21.3%). Moreover, the most frequent type of fracture in ankle dislocations was supination-external rotation (SER) ankle fracture (43.8%), while the most common directions of dislocation were lateral (50%) and posterior (38.9%).

Conclusions

Collectively, most ankle fracture-dislocations are caused by high-energy injuries and usually have poor functional outcomes. The mechanism of injury can be dissected by the ankle anatomy and Lauge-Hansen's classification. The treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations still requires more detailed and rational solutions due to the urgency of occurrence, the severity of injury, and the postoperative complications.

The Effect of Stabilization Procedures on Sports Discipline and Performance Level in Non-Elite Athletes after Acute Syndesmotic Injury: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Suture button devices for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries provide semirigid dynamic stabilization. The effect of stabilization procedures on sports discipline and performance level in non-elite athletes after acute syndesmotic injury has not been clarified in sports medicine research to date.

METHODS

A total of 47 of 56 eligible patients were analyzed and completed the 1-year follow-up. The average age was 35.5 years (range, 18-60 years). The screw fixation and knotless suture button groups comprised 26 and 21 patients, respectively. Nine patients were lost to follow-up. Patients underwent clinical and radiological evaluations preoperatively and twice during the 1-year postoperative follow-up. Function was measured using the FADI sports scale, the FAAM sports module, and a visual analogue scale for pain and function in sports. Questionnaires were completed to assess preoperative and postoperative sports levels and to evaluate the sports discipline.

RESULTS

All scores increased during the follow-up, but no significant differences were found in the FADI score, the FAAM sports module score and or the VAS score for pain and function during sport (p ≤ 0.05). Using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, we found no significant correlation between the groups for age, injury mechanism, or body mass index. Differences were identified in sports discipline and performance level between the groups during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant differences could be demonstrated between the two stabilization methods in terms of return to previous sport level and return to the original sport discipline, so both procedures can be regarded as equivalent at present.

Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament Suture Tape Augmentation for Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries

BACKGROUND

The best operative construct and technique for treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries is highly debated. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) suture repair or suture tape (ST) augmentation provides any biomechanical advantage to the operative repair of an isolated syndesmotic injury.

METHODS

Twelve lower leg specimens underwent biomechanical testing in 6 states: (1) intact, (2) AITFL suture repair, (3) AITFL suture repair + transsyndesmotic suture button (SB), (4) AITFL suture repair + ST augmentation + SB, (5) AITFL suture repair + ST augmentation, and (6) complete syndesmotic injury. The ankle joint was subjected to 6 cycles of 5 Nm internal and external rotation torque under a constant axial load. The spatial relationship between the tibia, fibula, and talus was continuously recorded with a 5-camera motion capture system.

RESULTS

AITFL suture repair and AITFL suture repair + ST augmentation showed no statistically significant change in fibula kinematics compared to the intact state. Compared to native, AITFL suture repair + SB showed increased fibular external rotation (+2.32 degrees, P < .001), and decreased tibiofibular gap (overtightening) (-0.72 mm, P = .007). AITFL suture repair + ST augmentation + SB also showed increased fibular external rotation (+1.46 degrees, P = .013). Sagittal plane motion of the fibula was not significantly different between any states. None of the repairs restored intact state talus rotation; however, the repairs that used ST augmentation reduced the talus external rotation laxity compared to the complete syndesmotic injury.

CONCLUSION

AITFL suture repair and AITFL ST augmentation best restored the rotational kinematics and stability of the fibula and ankle joint in an isolated syndesmotic injury model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

AITFL suture repair with or without ST augmentation may be a good operative addition or alternative to SB fixation for isolated syndesmotic disruptions.

Postoperative Ankle Imaging, 2022

Postoperative ankle imaging requires knowledge of the underlying surgical techniques, the usefulness of various imaging modalities, as well as an appreciation for the desired clinical outcomes. Surgical procedures discussed in this article are tibiotalar fracture fixation, tibiotalar, subtalar, and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, total ankle arthroplasty, talar osteochondral lesion repair and grafting, lateral ligamentous repair and reconstruction, and peroneal and Achilles tendon repair and reconstruction. Imaging can play a vital role in determining if the expected outcome has been achieved and identifying complications, with particular emphasis placed on the use of radiographs, computed tomography (including weight-bearing), magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography.

Maisonneuve Fractures of the Ankle: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Maisonneuve fractures (MFs), originally described as subcapital (high) fibular fractures with additional injury to the anterior and interosseous tibiofibular ligaments, display a variable injury pattern, ranging from stable to highly unstable fractures.

»

The high incidence of associated fractures of the posterior malleolus, the medial malleolus, and the anterolateral distal tibia (the "anterior malleolus") as well as the variable position of the fibula in the fibular notch (FN) warrant preoperative examination via computed tomography (CT).

»

The main goal of treatment is anatomic reduction of the distal fibula into the FN, which requires prior reduction of displaced posterior malleolar fractures, if present, to restore the integrity of the FN.

»

Open reduction of the distal fibula into the FN and fixation with 2 transsyndesmotic screws or fixation with a screw(s) and suture-button implant, under direct vision, on the lateral aspect of the ankle joint and anterior tibiofibular alignment are preferred over closed reduction to avoid sagittal or rotational malpositioning, which is associated with an inferior outcome.

»

Intra- or postoperative 3D CT visualization is essential for assessment of the accuracy of the reduction of the distal fibula into the FN.

Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries

Background: Surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries is not trivial, and there are no generally accepted treatment guidelines. The most common controversies regarding surgical treatment are related to screw fixation versus dynamic fixation, the use of reduction clamps, open versus closed reduction, and the role of the posterior malleolus and of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL). Our aim was to draw important conclusions from the pertinent literature concerning surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries, to transform these conclusions into surgical principles supported by the literature, and finally to fuse these principles into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists of systematic reviews of relevant studies dealing with the surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries were searched independently by two reviewers using specific terms and limits. Surgical principles supported by the literature were fused into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Results: A total of 171 articles were included for further considerations. Among them, 47 articles concerned syndesmotic screw fixation and 41 flexible dynamic fixations of the syndesmosis. Twenty-five studies compared screw fixation with dynamic fixations, and seven out of these comparisons were randomized controlled trials. Nineteen articles addressed the posterior malleolus, 14 the role of the AITFL, and eight the use of reduction clamps. Anatomic reduction is crucial to prevent posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Therefore, flexible dynamic stabilization techniques should be preferred whenever possible. An unstable AITFL should be repaired and augmented, as it represents an important stabilizer of external rotation of the distal fibula. Conclusions: The current literature provides sufficient arguments for the development of an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm for unstable syndesmotic injuries.

Static versus dynamic fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses

PURPOSE

Multiple Level I meta-analyses were conducted comparing traditional static vs. more recently introduced dynamic strategies of fixation for injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (TFS). The aim of this review was to assess their robustness and methodological quality, providing support in the choice of a treatment strategy in case of TFS injury using the highest level of evidence.

METHODS

In this systematic review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, meta-analyses/systematic reviews comparing static and dynamic fixation methods after acute TFS injury were identified. The robustness of studies was evaluated using the fragility index (FI) for meta-analysis and the fragility quotient (FQ). The risk of bias was evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument. Finally, the Jadad was applied to select the study which provided the highest quality of evidence to develop recommendations for the fixation strategy of these lesions.

RESULTS

Out of 1.302 records, four Level I meta-analyses were included in this study. Analyzing the statistically significant dichotomous outcomes, the median FI was 3.5 (IQR, 2 to 5.5; range, 1 to 9), while the median FQ was 1.9% (IQR, 1 to 3.5; range 0.35 to 4.4). In total, 37% had an FI of 2 or less and 75% of outcomes had a FI of 4 or less. According to the AMSTAR score and Jadad algorithm, the largest meta-analysis was selected as the highest evidence provided so far.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analyses with statistically significant dichotomous outcomes comparing dynamic and static fixation for treating injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are fragile, with a change in less than four patients or less than 2% of the study population sufficient to reverse a significant outcome to nonsignificant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Suture Button Technique and Screw Fixation Technique in Patients With Acute Syndesmotic Diastasis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background:

Our aim was to compare the outcome between suture button (SB) stabilization and syndesmotic screw fixation (SF) in patients with acute syndesmotic diastasis.

Methods:

A systematic literature search up to June 30, 2021, was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of SB with SF techniques in patients with acute syndesmotic diastasis. We calculated mean differences for continuous outcomes, using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method, and odds ratio for dichotomous outcomes, using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results:

Eight RCTs involving 569 patients met the inclusion criteria, 1 RCT with level I evidence, and 7 RCTs with level II evidence. The meta-analysis showed that the SB technique had a higher AOFAS score <6 months and 12 months postoperatively (MD = 4.74, 95% CI 1.68-7.80, P = .01; and MD = 5.42, 95% CI 1.50-9.33, P = .02) and reduced the risk of implant irritation (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.89, P = .03), implant failure (OR = 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.23, P < .01), and reoperation (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.22-0.83, P = .01). The 2 approaches did not differ in further functional outcomes or postoperative complications.

Conclusion:

Because functional outcomes showed no relevant difference between both SB and SF, the advantage of SB appears to be in the lower risk for postoperative complications. The SB technique led to fewer cases of implant irritation, implant failure, and reoperation compared with SF.

Level of Evidence:

Level I, meta-analysis of RCTs.

Syndesmotic Stabilization: Syndesmotic Screw Versus Flexible Fixation: A Systematic Review

Syndesmotic injuries are common injuries that occur in isolation or associated with ankle fractures. The suture button device fixation (SBDF) has become increasingly attractive to orthopedic surgeons as an alternative to metallic screw fixation (MSF) for syndesmotic fixation. This review involved the highest-quality clinical biomechanical and cost analysis studies to provide a comprehensive review. A literature search in the electronic databases was conducted to identify clinical, biomechanical as well as cost analysis studies in which the MSF was compared to SBDF from 1990 to 2018. Only comparative clinical studies with a level of evidence I or II were included besides any comparative biomechanical or cost analysis study. The (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Eight clinical, 11 biomechanical, and 3 cost analysis studies were included. The clinical studies consisted of 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 cohort studies. The average American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score for the SBDF group was (92.4) compared to (86.6) for the MSF group at 1 year follow-up. SBDF group showed a lower rate of malreduction, implant removal, implant failure, and complications. The biomechanical studies showed better reduction accuracy in the SBDF group. The reduction maintenance was comparable in the coronal plane but not in the sagittal plane. The cost-effectiveness of the SBDF was highly dependent on the difference in implant removal rate. In conclusion, the SBDF showed comparable to better outcomes compared to the MSF. It may be a better option for syndesmotic fixation.

Ankle and syndesmosis instability: consensus and controversies

Ankle sprains are mainly benign lesions, but if not well addressed can evolve into permanent disability. A non-treated lateral, syndesmotic or medial ankle instability can evolve into ankle osteoarthritis. For this reason, diagnosis and treatment of these entities is of extreme importance.In general, acute instabilities undergo conservative treatment, while chronic instabilities are better addressed with surgical treatment. It is important to identify which acute instabilities are better treated with early surgical treatment.Syndesmosis injuries are frequently overlooked and represent a cause for persistent pain in ankle sprains. Unstable syndesmotic lesions are always managed by surgery.Non-treated deltoid ligament ruptures can evolve into a progressive valgus deformity of the hindfoot, due to its links with the spring ligament complex. This concept would give new importance to the diagnosis and treatment of acute medial ligament lesions.Multi-ligament lesions are usually unstable and are better treated with early surgery. A high suspicion rate is required, especially for combined syndesmotic and medial lesions or lateral and medial lesions.Ankle arthroscopy is a powerful tool for both diagnostic and treatment purposes. It is becoming mandatory in the management of ankle instabilities and multiple arthroscopic lateral/syndesmotic/medial repair techniques are emerging. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:420-431. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210017.

Comparison of Suture-Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw in the Treatment of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Meta-analysis

Traditionally screw fixation is an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of unstable syndesmosis injuries. However, it is still a controversy whether suture-button (SB) device can achieve better clinical outcomes and decrease the risk of complications compared with syndesmotic screw (SS). The present meta-analysis was conducted to figure out whether SB fixation was superior to traditionally screw fixation. Twelve clinical studies were identified, involving 320 patients in the SB group and 334 patients in the SS group. Among patients treated with SB, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was significantly higher at 3-month follow-up (p = .01) and 2-year follow-up (p = .02), and the Olerud-Molander Ankle (OMA) score at 1-year follow-up (p = .002). In addition, the SB group had significantly better results in the malreduction (p = .0008), implant failure (p < .01), implant removal (p < .01), and local irritation (p = .004). No statistical differences were found in the AOFAS at 6 months follow-up (p = .33) and 1-year follow-up (p = .33), OMA at 3 months follow-up (p = .09), 6 months follow-up (p = .14) and 2 years follow-up (p = .36), the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (p = .73), Euro Qol 5-dimension questionnaire (p = .33), dorsiflexion (DF; p = .91), plantarflexion (p = .23), medial clear space (p = .42), tibiofibular clear space (p = .60), tibiofibular overlap (p = .84), and other complications (p = .95). Based on this meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in postoperative radiological measurements, and no sufficient evidence was found to support the improved clinical outcomes compared with SS fixation group. However, SB technique could improve functional outcomes, reduce the rate of implant removal, implant failure, local irritation, and malreduction without increasing risk of other complications. Therefore, the SB technique should be recommended in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries.

Reconstruction of Chronic Injured Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis with Autogenous Tendon Graft: A Systematic Review

Background

Chronic injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are common in patients who fail to receive adequate diagnosis and timely treatment. Reconstruction of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with an autogenous tendon graft in these patients is effective, although relatively rarely reported.

Purpose

To investigate clinical outcomes of syndesmosis reconstruction with an autogenous tendon graft for chronic injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis by reviewing the current literature.

Methods

An English literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases to identify published studies up to October 2017. Preset inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to identify all eligible articles.

Results

Five studies (all with level IV evidence) that included a total of 51 patients who underwent reconstruction with an autogenous tendon graft were identified. It was reported that the symptoms were relieved postoperatively, including obviously improved functional outcomes and restoration of motions and exercise capacity. The mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale score of 16 patients was 53 preoperatively and 89 postoperatively. The visual analogue scale score of 14 patients decreased from 82.4 preoperatively to 12.6 postoperatively. A total of 5 (9.8%) complication cases were reported.

Conclusion

Reconstruction of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with an autogenous tendon for chronic syndesmosis injury showed a good therapeutic effect in terms of both subjective symptoms and objective evaluation scores. The interosseous ligament could be an appropriate reconstruction target in the treatment of chronic syndesmosis injury.

Optimizing Return to Play for Common and Controversial Foot and Ankle Sports Injuries

»

Surgical decision-making should consider factors to help optimize return to play for athletes with foot and ankle injuries, including injuries to the syndesmosis, the Achilles tendon, the fifth metatarsal, and the Lisfranc complex. Understanding influential factors on return to play may help orthopaedic surgeons counsel athletes and coaches on expectations for a timeline to return to play and performance metrics.

»

Outcomes after rigid and flexible fixation for syndesmotic injuries are generally favorable. Some data support an earlier return to sport and higher functional scores with flexible fixation, in addition to lower rates of reoperation and a decreased incidence of malreduction, particularly with deltoid repair, if indicated.

»

Minimally invasive techniques for Achilles tendon repair have been shown to have a decreased risk of wound complications. Athletes undergoing Achilles repair should expect to miss a full season of play to recover.

»

Athletes with fifth metatarsal fractures have better return-to-play outcomes with surgical management and can expect a high return-to-play rate within approximately 3 months of surgery.

»

Percutaneous treatment of Lisfranc injuries may expedite return to play relative to open procedures.

[Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury]

Objective

To review the research progress in the diagnosis and treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

Methods

The recent literature about distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury was reviewed and analyzed.

Results

Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury is commonly seen in ankle joint injury, the anatomical complexities make diagnosis and treatment difficult. Preoperative physical examination, radiologic evaluation, and intraoperative stress-testing are important for the diagnosis. Aggressive treatment is also recommended for these injuries to prevent long-term chronic instability. Internal fixation is the main treatment, including metal screw, degradable screw, elastic fixation, and hybrid techniques. Metal screw fixation is still the current mainstream, but elastic fixation represented by Suture-button is more in line with the physiological characteristics of ankle joint, and the rate of secondary operation is low while the clinical outcome is satisfactory. The application prospect of elastic fixation is worthy of expectation.

Conclusion

It's crucial for patient with ankle fracture to repair the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. How to diagnose the injury more accurately and simply, how to increase the success rate of reduction, and how to reduce the complications of surgery are still worthy for further exploration.

Anterior Syndesmotic Augmentation Technique Using Nonabsorbable Suture-Tape for Acute and Chronic Syndesmotic Instability

Syndesmotic instability is a source of significant pain and disability. Both subtle instability and gross diastasis, whether acute or chronic, require stabilization and may benefit from reconstruction with ligamentous augmentation. The use of nonabsorbable suture-tape has emerged as a promising operative strategy, allowing surgeons to anatomically reconstruct the syndesmosis, in particular the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament. The current work provides a detailed description of the technique and preliminary results of a patient cohort treated using nonabsorbable suture-tape for syndesmotic augmentation.Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.

Does the choice of syndesmotic screw versus suture button in ankle surgery has a silver lining? - a technical note

Purpose

Unstable ankle fractures with associated syndesmotic injury are of considerable morbidity in the professional athlete population. The use of dynamic suture button versus static syndesmotic screws fixation, rehabilitation protocols and timing to return to play are still areas of debate. We report the use of novel algorithm of sequential static and dynamic syndesmotic fixation in an elite football player with Weber C ankle fracture.

Methods

The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation for a weber C ankle fracture with associated syndesmotic and deltoid ligament injury. The osteosynthesis included lateral malleolus neutralizing plate, two syndesmotic screws and deltoid anchor repair. At 6 weeks post-operative both syndesmotic screws were removed and one suture button was implanted in the proximal screw hole. After the second operation the patient was allowed full weight bearing and range of motion in all direction with accelerated rehabilitation protocol.

Results

The technique provided satisfactory results. At 4 month the player participated in a 90 min official football match. The fracture healed uneventfully with no recurrent syndesmotic diastasis.

Conclusion

The presented technique of sequential dynamic and static fixation of associated syndesmotic injuries combined advantages of both syndesmotic screws and suture button implants. In an aim to allow earlier return to play in an elite football player. This opens the way for higher level of evidence clinical trials.

Sagittal instability with inversion is important to evaluate after syndesmosis injury and repair: a cadaveric robotic study

PURPOSE

Disruption of the syndesmosis, the anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), the posterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and the interosseous membrane (IOM), leads to residual symptoms after an ankle injury. The objective of this study was to quantify tibiofibular joint motion with isolated AITFL- and complete syndesmotic injury and with syndesmotic screw vs. suture button repair compared to the intact ankle.

METHODS

Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 60 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a six degree-of-freedom robotic testing system and three-dimensional tibiofibular motion was quantified using an optical tracking system. A 5 Nm inversion moment was applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion, and 10° dorsiflexion. Outcome measures included fibular medial-lateral translation, anterior-posterior translation, and external rotation in each ankle state: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected (isolated AITFL injury), 3) AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected (complete injury), 4) tricortical screw fixation, and 5) suture button repair.

RESULTS

Both isolated AITFL and complete injury caused significant increases in fibular posterior translation at 15° and 30° plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle (p < 0.05). Tricortical screw fixation restored the intact ankle tibiofibular kinematics in all planes. Suture button repair resulted in 3.7 mm, 3.8 mm, and 2.9 mm more posterior translation of the fibula compared to the intact ankle at 30° and 15° plantarflexion and 0° flexion, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ankle instability is similar after both isolated AITFL and complete syndesmosis injury and persists after suture button fixation in the sagittal plane in response an inversion stress. Sagittal instability with ankle inversion should be considered when treating patients with isolated AITFL syndesmosis injuries and after suture button fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Controlled laboratory study, Level V.