Increased Glenoid Retroversion Is Associated With Increased Rotator Cuff Strength in the Shoulder

Concordance of Preoperative 3D Templating in Stemless Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in preoperative 3D templating software allow surgeons to plan implant size and position for stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Whether these preoperative plans accurately reflect intraoperative decisions is yet unknown, and the purpose of this study was to evaluate concordance between planned and actual implant sizes in a series of patients undergoing stemless TSA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of consecutive, anatomic, stemless TSA cases performed by two surgeons between September 2019 and February 2021 was examined. Preoperative templated plans were collected using 3D planning software, and the sizes of planned glenoid, humeral head, and nucleus "stem" implants and other procedural data were recorded, along with sociodemographic information. These predicted parameters were compared with the implant sizes, and the concordance of these templated plans was quantified by direct comparison and bootstrapped simulations.

RESULTS

Fifty cases met inclusion criteria, among which perfect concordance across all three implants was observed in 11 cases (22%). The glenoid implant had the highest concordance (80%) relative to the humeral head and nucleus implants (38% and 60%, respectively), which was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Planned humeral head implants were more often oversized relative to their actual implanted size. However, 84% of the planned humeral heads were within 1 diameter size; in addition, 98% of the planned glenoid implants were within one size and all were within 10 mm of the implanted glenoid backside radius. All nucleus implants were within one size.

DISCUSSION

Final implant sizes demonstrated variable concordance relative to preoperative plans, with glenoid implants having the highest accuracy and humeral heads having the highest variability. Multiple factors contributed to the varying concordances for the different implants, suggesting possible areas of improvement in this technology. These results may have implications for logistics, intraoperative efficiency, and overall cost and underscore the potential value of this technology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Residual Effects of Glenohumeral Range of Motion, Strength, and Humeral Retroversion on Prior Overhead Athletes After Cessation of Sport

Background:

Research has shown that repetitive stress from playing an overhead (OH) sport can cause musculoskeletal and osseous adaptations to occur on the dominant side. Additionally, there are limited data about the residual effects of these adaptations after the cessation of sports participation.

Purpose:

To investigate the effects of prior participation in an OH sport versus not participating in an OH sport on glenohumeral range of motion (ROM), isometric strength, and humeral retroversion (HR).

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Forty-eight college-aged individuals participated. Participants were split into 2 groups: (1) individuals who previously participated in an OH sport (n = 20; age, 20.3 ± 1.1 years; height, 166.3 ± 15.27 cm; weight, 72.2 ± 13.5 kg) and (2) individuals who previously did not play an OH sport (n = 28; age, 20.6 ± 0.9 years; height, 168.8 ± 6.3 cm; weight, 68.1 ± 15.1 kg). After completing a health history questionnaire, the following were measured: side-to-side shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) ROM via an inclinometer, isometric shoulder strength via a handheld dynamometer, and HR using an ultrasound imaging machine. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine group differences, and a Wilcoxon t test was used to analyze side-to-side differences within each group.

Results:

The Mann-Whitney U test revealed a statistically significant group difference for dominant shoulder ER ROM (U = 162.00, P = .014). Specifically, the prior OH group had significantly more ER than the control group. Within the prior OH group, testing revealed that athletes had significantly more HR (Z =–2.782, P = .005), ER ROM (Z =–1.979, P = .048), and ER isometric strength (Z =–2.763, P = .006) on their dominant than nondominant shoulder and significantly less IR ROM (Z =–3.099, P = .002) on their dominant than nondominant shoulder.

Conclusion:

Prior OH sports participation may have residual osseous and musculoskeletal effects that remain after cessation of the sport.

The critical shoulder angle, the acromial index, the glenoid version angle and the acromial angulation are associated with rotator cuff tears

PURPOSE

To compare the critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromion index (AI), acromion angulation (AA) and glenoid version angle (GVA) between patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and patients with intact rotator cuffs.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2018, the CSA, AI, AA and GVA were measured in consecutively included patients aged > 40 years who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for full-thickness RCTs. A total of 437 patients with RCTs and a mean age of 51.2 years (± 5.8) were included, 35.7% of whom were male. In the control group, there were n = 433 patients (36.3% male) with an intact rotator cuff, and the mean age was 50.7 years (± 5.3).

RESULTS

The mean AI for the RCT group was 0.7 ± 0.1, which was significantly higher than the mean AI for the control group (0.6 ± 0.1, p < 0.001). The mean CSA for the RCT group was 33.6° ± 3.9°, which was significantly higher than the mean CSA for the control group (31.5° ± 4°, p < 0.001). The mean AA for the RCT group was 13.9° ± 9°, which was significantly higher than the mean AA for the control group (12.4 ± 8.6, p = 0.012). The mean GVA for the RCT group was - 3.5° ± 4.6° and significantly retroverted compared with the mean GVA for the control group (- 2.2° ± 4.6°, p < 0.001). The cutoff values determined by the ROC curve analyses were as follows: 0.6 for AI, 31.4° for CSA, 9.6° for AA and - 2.6° for GVA.

CONCLUSION

The CSA, AI, GVA and AA values measured by MRI were determined to be significantly related to full-thickness rotator cuff ruptures. The AI, CSA, AA and GVA may be considered risk factors for degenerative rotator cuff tears. Assessing the CSA, AI, GVA and AA can be helpful for diagnostic evaluation of patients with full-thickness RCTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.