The Femoral Footprint Position of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Might Be a Predisposing Factor to a Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Race and Gender Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Footprint Location and Orientation: A 3D-MRI Study

OBJECTIVE

The femoral tunnel position is crucial to anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but the ideal femoral footprint position are mostly based on small-sized cadaveric studies and elderly patients with a single ethnic background. This study aimed to identify potential race- or gender-specific differences in the ACL femoral footprint location and ACL orientation, determine the correlation between the ACL orientation and the femoral footprint location.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 90 Caucasian participants and 90 matched Chinese subjects were used for reconstruction of three-dimensional (3D) femur and tibial models. ACL footprints were sketched by several experienced orthopedic surgeons on the MRI photographs. The anatomical coordinate system was applied to reflect the ACL footprint location and orientation of scanned samples. The femoral ACL footprint locations were represented by their distance from the origin in the anteroposterior (A/P) and distal-proximal (D/P) directions. The orientation of the ACL was described with the sagittal, coronal and transverse deviation angles. The ACL orientation and femoral footprint position were compared by the two-sided t-test. Multiple regression analysis was used to study the correlation between the orientation and femoral footprint position.

RESULTS

The average femur footprint A/P position was -6.6 ± 1.6 mm in the Chinese group and -5.1 ± 2.3 mm in the Caucasian group, (p < 0.001). The average femur footprint D/P position was -2.8 ± 2.4 mm in Chinese and - 3.9 ± 2.0 mm in Caucasians, (p = 0.001). The Chinese group had a mean difference of a 1.5 mm (6.1%) more posterior and 1.1 mm (5.3%) more proximal in the position from the flexion-extension axis (FEA). And the males have a sagittal plane elevation about 4-5° higher than females in both racial groups. Furthermore, for every 1% (0.40 mm) increase in A/P and D/P values, the sagittal angle decreased by about 0.12° and 0.24°, respectively; the coronal angle decreased by about 0.10° and 0.30°, respectively. For every 1% (0.40 mm) increase in D/P value, the transverse angle increased by about 0.14°.

CONCLUSION

The significant race- and gender-specific differences in the femoral footprint and orientation of the ACL should be taken in consideration during anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, the quantitative relationship between the ACL orientation and the footprint location might provide some reference for surgeons to develop a surgical strategy in ACL single-bundle reconstruction and revision.

Comparison of instantaneous knee kinematics during walking and running

BACKGROUND

Accurate measurements of in-vivo knee joint kinematics are essential to elucidate healthy knee motion and the changes that accompany injury and repair. Although numerous experimental measurements have been reported, the accurate non-invasive analysis of in-vivo knee kinematics remains a challenge in biomechanics.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The study objective was to investigate in-vivo knee kinematics before, at, and after contact during walking and running using a combined high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique.

METHODS

Three-dimensional (3D) knee models of ten participants were created using MR images. Knee kinematics during walking and running were determined using high-speed DFIS. The 3D knee models were then related to fluoroscopic images to obtain in-vivo six-degrees-of-freedom knee kinematics.

RESULTS

Before contact knee flexion, external femoral rotation, and proximal-distal distance were 11.9°, 3.4°, and 1.0 mm greater during running compared to walking, respectively. Similar differences were observed at initial contact (9.9°, 7.9°, and 0.9 mm, respectively) and after contact (6.4°, 2.2°, and 0.8 mm, respectively). Posterior femoral translation at initial contact was also increased during running compared to walking.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrated accurate instantaneous in-vivo knee kinematic characteristics that may further the understanding of the intrinsic biomechanics of the knee during gait.

Influence of the Anteromedial Portal and Transtibial Drilling Technique on Femoral Tunnel Lengths in ACL Reconstruction: Results Using an MRI-Based Model

Background:

In anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, graft placement through the anteromedial (AM) portal technique requires more horizontal drilling of the femoral tunnel as compared with the transtibial (TT) technique, which may lead to a shorter femoral tunnel and affect graft-to-bone healing. The effect of coronal and sagittal femoral tunnel obliquity angle on femoral tunnel length has not been investigated.

Purpose:

To compare the length of the femoral tunnels created with the TT technique versus the AM portal technique at different coronal and sagittal obliquity angles using the native femoral ACL center as the starting point of the femoral tunnel. The authors also assessed sex-based differences in tunnel lengths.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

Magnetic resonance imaging scans of 95 knees with an ACL rupture (55 men, 40 women; mean age, 26 years [range, 16-45 years]) were used to create 3-dimensional models of the femur. The femoral tunnel was simulated on each model using the TT and AM portal techniques; for the latter, several coronal and sagittal obliquity angles were simulated (coronal, 30°, 45°, and 60°; sagittal, 45° and 60°), representing the 10:00, 10:30, and 11:00 clockface positions for the right knee. The length of the femoral tunnel was compared between the techniques and between male and female patients.

Results:

The mean ± SD femoral tunnel length with the TT technique was 40.0 ± 6.8 mm. A significantly shorter tunnel was created with the AM portal technique at 30° coronal/45° sagittal (35.5 ± 3.8 mm), whereas a longer tunnel was created at 60° coronal/60° sagittal (53.3 ± 5.3 mm; P < .05 for both). The femoral tunnel created with the AM portal technique at 45° coronal/45° sagittal (40.7 ± 4.8 mm) created a similar tunnel length as the TT technique. For all techniques, the femoral tunnel was significantly shorter in female patients than male patients.

Conclusion:

The coronal and sagittal obliquity angles of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction can significantly affect its length. The femoral tunnel created with the AM portal technique at 45° coronal/45° sagittal was similar to that created with the TT technique.

Clinical Relevance:

Surgeons should be aware of the femoral tunnel shortening with lower coronal obliquity angles, especially in female patients.

High variability in anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint: Implications for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to (1) investigate the variability of the femoral ACL center in ACL-ruptured patients, (2) identify whether the currently available over-the-top femoral ACL guides could allow for anatomical reconstruction of the native ACL footprint.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Magnetic resonance images of 95 knees with an ACL rupture were used to create three-dimensional models of the femur. The femoral ACL footprint area was outlined on each model, and the location of the femoral ACL center was reported using an anatomical coordinate system. The distance of the femoral ACL center from the over-the-top position was measured.

RESULTS

The femoral ACL center demonstrated a high intersubject variability ranging from 1.8 mm (9%) to 12.3 mm (60%) posterior and from 7.7 mm (37%) distal to 4.8 mm (23%) proximal using the posterior condyle circle reference. The average distance of the femoral ACL center from the over-the-top position was 1.9 ± 1.5 mm posterior and 13.8 ± 2.7 mm distal, respectively. The contemporary over-the-top femoral ACL aimers could restore the femoral ACL center in only 6.5% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The femoral ACL center demonstrated a high variation on its location, which resulted in a high intersubject variability from the over-the-top position. The contemporary over-the-top femoral tunnel guides do not provide sufficient offset to allow for an anatomical ACL reconstruction. Anteromedial-portal specific femoral ACL guides with a femoral offset ranging from 10 to 18 mm in the proximal/distal direction are required to restore the native ACL footprint.

Anterior cruciate ligament bundle insertions vary between ACL-rupture and non-injured knees

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to investigate the three-dimensional topographic anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) bundle attachment in both ACL-rupture and ACL-intact patients who suffered a noncontact knee injury and identify potential differences.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images of 90 ACL-rupture knees and 90 matched ACL-intact knees, who suffered a noncontact knee injury, were used to create 3D ACL insertion models.

RESULTS

In the ACL-rupture knees, the femoral origin of the anteromedial (AM) bundle was 24.5 ± 9.0% posterior and 45.5 ± 10.5% proximal to the flexion-extension axis (FEA), whereas the posterolateral (PL) bundle origin was 35.5 ± 12.5% posterior and 22.4 ± 10.3% distal to the FEA. In ACL-rupture knees, the tibial insertion of the AM-bundle was 34.3 ± 4.6% of the tibial plateau depth and 50.7 ± 3.5% of the tibial plateau width, whereas the PL-bundle insertion was 47.5 ± 4.1% of the tibial plateau depth and 56.9 ± 3.4% of the tibial plateau width. In ACL-intact knees, the origin of the AM-bundle was 17.5 ± 9.1% posterior (p < 0.01) and 42.3 ± 10.5% proximal (n.s.) to the FEA, whereas the PL-bundle origin was 32.1 ± 11.1% posterior (n.s.) and 16.3 ± 9.4% distal (p < 0.01) to the FEA. In ACL-intact knees, the insertion of the AM-bundle was 34.4 ± 6.6% of the tibial plateau depth (n.s.) and 48.1 ± 4.6% of the tibial plateau width (n.s.), whereas the PL-bundle insertion was 42.7 ± 5.4% of the tibial plateau depth (p < 0.01) and 57.1 ± 4.8% of the tibial plateau width (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The current study revealed variations in the three-dimensional topographic anatomy of the native ACL between ACL-rupture and ACL-intact knees, which might help surgeons who perform anatomical double-bundle reconstruction surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Anterior root of lateral meniscus and medial tibial spine are reliable intraoperative landmarks for the tibial footprint of anterior cruciate ligament

PURPOSE

The aims of the present study were (1) to investigate the tibial footprint location of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in both ACL-ruptured and ACL-intact patients, (2) to identify the relationship of the tibial footprint to the anterior root of the lateral meniscus (ARLM) and medial tibial spine (MTS), and (3) to evaluate the reliability of the ARLM and MTS for identifying the center of the tibial ACL footprint.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images of 90 knees with ACL rupture and 90 matched-controlled knees were used to create three-dimensional models of the tibia. The tibial ACL footprint was outlined on each model, and its location was measured using an anatomical coordinate system.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the location of the tibial footprint was found between ACL-ruptured and ACL-intact knees. The tibial ACL footprint was located in very close proximity to the ARLM, especially in the M/L direction. The safe zone of tibial tunnel reaming for avoiding damage to the ARLM was 2.6 mm lateral to the center of the native tibial footprint. Both the ARLM and MTS were reliable intraoperative landmarks for identifying the tibial footprint.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the safe zone of tibial tunnel reaming for avoiding injury to the ARLM. Both the ARLM and MTS might be reliable landmarks for identifying the center of the tibial ACL footprint and may facilitate tibial tunnel placement during anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction, especially in cases of revision where the tibial ACL stump is not available.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

3T MRI-based anatomy of the anterolateral knee ligament in patients with and without an ACL-rupture: Implications for anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is often accompanied by an injury to the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee. Detailed knowledge of the ALL attachments in ACL-ruptured patients is essential for an anatomical ALL reconstruction to avoid knee over-constraint and successfully treat the residual rotational instability. The aim of the present study was to investigate the three-dimensional (3D), topographic anatomy of the ALL attachment in both ACL-ruptured and ACL-intact patients using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3T MRI).

METHODS

In the present, retrospective case-control study, the magnetic resonance images of 90 knees with an ACL-rupture and 90 matched-controlled subjects, who suffered a non-contact knee injury without an ACL-rupture, were used to create 3D models of the knee. The femoral and tibial ALL footprints were outlined on each model, and their position was measured using an anatomical coordinate system.

RESULTS

The femoral origin of the ALL was located 4.9 ± 2.8 mm posterior and 3.8 ± 2.4 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle in a non-isometric location in control subjects. In ACL-ruptured patients, it was located in a more posterior and distal, at 6.0 ± 1.9 mm posterior and 2.4 ± 1.7 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle (p < 0.01), also in a non-isometric location. No difference was found in the tibial ALL insertion between groups.

CONCLUSION

The femoral ALL origin was significantly different in ACL-ruptured patients compared to ACL-intact patients. The recommended femoral tunnel position for the anatomical ALL reconstruction, does not represent the femoral ALL origin in the ACL-ruptured knee.