Comparative Clinical Outcomes After Intra-articular Injection With Adipose-Derived Cultured Stem Cells or Noncultured Stromal Vascular Fraction for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Response

Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Adipose-Derived Stromal Cell vs Stromal Vascular Fraction Injection for Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: 2-Year Results of Parallel Single-Arm Trials

BACKGROUND

There are currently no disease-modifying treatments available for knee osteoarthritis (OA), although cultured adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) have shown promise in experimental models. However, given the regulatory limits on the use of cultured cells in humans, previous trials have focused primarily on the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) intra-articular injection. Therefore, the therapeutic value of ASCs for knee OA remains unknown.

PURPOSE

To study ASC versus SVF intra-articular injection in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) knee OA grades 2 to 4 in parallel single-arm trials.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients were enrolled, with 42 (72 knees) receiving ASC intra-articular injection and 38 (69 knees) receiving SVF. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 5 (KOOS5) and pain visual analog scale (VAS). The percentages of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were also calculated. Per protocol, a subset of the ASC group received an ASC booster injection after 6 months. A repeated-measures analysis of variance compared results between treatment arms and by KL grade over time.

RESULTS

Patient-reported outcome measures improved substantially after both treatments (P < .05 at all time points), with the ASC group more likely to achieve the MCID (50% vs 24%; P = .01) and PASS (45% vs 24%; P = .04) for the pain VAS and the MCID (43% vs 16%; P = .02) for the KOOS5 at 12 months, although not at 24 months. Knees treated with ASC for KL grade 2/3 OA had significantly superior outcomes compared with those with KL grade 4 OA for the KOOS5 (P = .01) and pain VAS (P = .03), but no such difference was observed in knees treated with SVF. Three patients receiving ASCs (7%; all KL grade 3) sought additional nonoperative treatment by 24 months versus 9 patients receiving SVF (24%; all KL grade 3) (P = .06). ASC booster injections conferred no additional benefit. Notably, patients in the ASC cohort reported more injection-site pain and swelling after the booster injection than after the initial injection (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This represents the first head-to-head comparison of ASCs and SVF for the treatment of knee OA in humans. ASC and SVF injections both substantially improved knee pain and function at all follow-up time points, although ASC injections demonstrated significantly better improvements with regard to the MCID and PASS for the pain VAS and the MCID for the KOOS5 at 12 months. There appears to be no benefit to a booster ASC injection after initial treatment. Given less donor-site morbidity and equivalent superior outcomes at 2 years, the use of ASCs over SVF in the treatment of knee OA may be warranted.

Meta-Analysis of Adipose Tissue Derived Cell-Based Therapy for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disorder associated with cartilage loss and is a leading cause of disability around the world. In old age, the capacity of cartilage to regenerate is diminished. With an aging population, the burden of OA is set to rise. Currently, there is no definitive treatment for OA. However, cell-based therapies derived from adipose tissue are promising. A PRISMA systematic review was conducted employing four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science) to identify all clinical studies that utilized adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs) or stromal vascular fraction (SVF) for the treatment of knee OA. Eighteen studies were included, which met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were conducted on fourteen of these studies, which all documented WOMAC scores after the administration of AMSCs. Pooled analysis revealed that cell-based treatments definitively improve WOMAC scores, post treatment. These improvements increased with time. The studies in this meta-analysis have established the safety and efficacy of both AMSC therapy and SVF therapy for knee OA in old adults and show that they reduce pain and improve knee function in symptomatic knee OA suggesting that they may be effective therapies to improve mobility in an aging population.

Hyaluronic Acid Supplement as a Chondrogenic Adjuvant in Promoting the Therapeutic Efficacy of Stem Cell Therapy in Cartilage Healing

The main aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of direct intra-articular injection of bone-marrow-derived stem/stromal cells (BMSCs) and the adjuvant role of hyaluronic acid (HA) in facilitating rabbit articular cartilage repair. First, rabbit BMSCs were treated with a medium containing different concentrations of HA. Later, HA’s influence on BMSCs’ CD44 expression, cell viability, extracellular glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis, and chondrogenic gene expression was evaluated during seven-day cultivation. For the in vivo experiment, 24 rabbits were used for animal experiments and 6 rabbits were randomly allocated to each group. Briefly, chondral defects were created at the medial femoral condyle; group 1 was left untreated, group 2 was injected with HA, group 3 was transplanted with 3 × 10⁶ BMSCs, and group 4 was transplanted with 3 × 10⁶ BMSCs suspended in HA. Twelve weeks post-treatment, the repair outcome in each group was assessed and compared both macroscopically and microscopically. Results showed that HA treatment can promote cellular CD44 expression. However, the proliferation rate of BMSCs was downregulated when treated with 1 mg/mL (3.26 ± 0.03, p = 0.0002) and 2 mg/mL (2.61 ± 0.04, p = 0.0001) of HA compared to the control group (3.49 ± 0.05). In contrast, 2 mg/mL (2.86 ± 0.3) of HA treatment successfully promoted normalized GAG expression compared to the control group (1.88 ± 0.06) (p = 0.0009). The type II collagen gene expression of cultured BMSCs was significantly higher in BMSCs treated with 2 mg/mL of HA (p = 0.0077). In the in vivo experiment, chondral defects treated with combined BMSC and HA injection demonstrated better healing outcomes than BMSC or HA treatment alone in terms of gross grading and histological scores. In conclusion, this study helps delineate the role of HA as a chondrogenic adjuvant in augmenting the effectiveness of stem-cell-based injection therapy for in vivo cartilage repair. From a translational perspective, the combination of HA and BMSCs is a convenient, ready-to-use, and effective formulation that can improve the therapeutic efficacy of stem-cell-based therapies.