Outcomes More Than 2 Years After Meniscal Repair for Longitudinal Tears of the Lateral Meniscus Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Effect of inside-out meniscal repair on meniscal dimension in meniscal tear patients

Background

It remains controversial whether meniscal repair causes meniscal extrusion. This study aimed to investigate the effect of inside-out meniscal repair on meniscal dimensions in patients with meniscal tear of the mid-body-posterior horn.

Methods

This retrospective study included 75 patients who underwent meniscal repair followed by MRI within 2 weeks after surgery between 2020 and 2022. Patients with a discoid lateral meniscus, pull-out repair, concomitant osteotomy, all-inside repair only, and revision surgery were excluded. Thirty-three meniscal tear treated using an inside-out arthroscopic repair technique were included in the lateral meniscus (LM, n = 19) and medial meniscus (MM, n = 14) tear groups. Thirty-six participants with intact meniscus were included as controls. Meniscal extrusion and posterior shift were measured on coronal and sagittal MRI pre-operatively and within 2 weeks postoperatively.

Results

Preoperative coronal extrusion was significantly greater in the LM tear group than in the control group (P = 0.001). Coronal extrusion and posterior shift were significantly smaller postoperatively than preoperatively in the LM tear group (P < 0.001 and, P = 0.008, respectively). Pre- and postoperative coronal extrusion in the MM tear group were not significantly different (P = 0.291). Postoperative coronal extrusion in both LM and MM tear groups were not significantly correlated with the number of sutures required for repair (LM: P = 0.765, R = -0.076, MM: P = 0.1, R = 0.497).

Conclusions

The torn meniscus of the mid-body - posterior horn before surgery was extruded and shifted posteriorly in both LM and MM tears, and repair using an inside-out arthroscopic technique was effective in reducing meniscal extrusion and posteriors shift in the LM tear immediately after surgery.

Meniscal resection increases the risk of residual knee laxity even in patients undergoing anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with eight strands of hamstring autografts

PURPOSE

To compare the midterm clinical outcomes of different meniscal surgeries in patients undergoing anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-ACLR) with eight strands of hamstring (HT8) autografts and explore the potential predictive risk factors for residual knee laxity.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2017, a total of 410 patients who underwent anatomic trans-tibial DB-ACLR with HT8 autografts (169 patients without meniscal surgery, 105 patients with meniscal repair, and 136 patients with meniscal resection) were included in this study. The equivalent graft diameter was introduced to make the total graft size of DB-ACLR comparable with that of single-bundle ACLR and calculated as the square root of the quadratic sum of the diameter for each bundle. Residual laxity was defined as excessive anterior tibial translation or residual pivot shift at any follow-up visit, while graft rupture was confirmed by second-look arthroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 8.3 ± 2.2 years. The mean equivalent graft diameter was 9.9 ± 0.7 mm. Graft rupture was confirmed in 16 (3.9%) patients, while residual laxity was detected in 72 (17.6%) patients (34 [25.0%] in the meniscal resection group vs. 22 [13.0%] in the no meniscal surgery group, p = 0.021). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, high-grade preoperative knee laxity (odds ratio OR 2.04, p = 0.020), equivalent graft diameter < 9 mm (OR 3.31 compared with 9-10 mm, p = 0.012; OR 3.28 compared with ≥ 10 mm, p = 0.019), and meniscal resection (OR 1.94 compared with no meniscal surgery, p = 0.045) were associated with residual laxity.

CONCLUSION

During a midterm follow-up, meniscal resection increased the risk of residual knee laxity even in patients undergoing anatomic DB-ACLR with HT8 autografts. Increasing the hamstring graft diameter and preserving the menisci are important strategies for ACLR to restore knee stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Transtibial Pullout Repair of Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tear with Tissue Loss: A Case with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Medial Meniscus Tear

Lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tear (LMPRT) is mainly caused by trauma, especially trauma associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Although a transtibial pullout repair or a side-to-side repair is commonly performed for LMPRT, to the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical report of LMPRT with tissue loss using the pullout technique. Thus, the purpose of this report was to describe a clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic outcome after pullout repair for a case of LMPRT with a large defect with a chronic ACL tear and complex medial meniscus (MM) tears. A 31-year-old man complained of knee pain and restricted range of motion after twisting his knee when he stepped on an iron pipe. The patient had a football-related injury to his right knee 14 years before presentation, and since then, the patient's knee has given out more than 10 times but was left unassessed. Magnetic resonance imaging showed LMPRT with tissue loss, ACL tears, and complex MM tears. Transtibial pullout repair of the LMPRT with ACL reconstruction and MM repairs were performed. Following the pullout repair of the LMPRT, an approximately 6 mm gap remained between the LM posterior root and root insertion. However, magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy at 1 year postoperatively revealed meniscal healing, gap filling with some regeneration tissue, of the LM posterior root. Furthermore, the lateral meniscus extrusion in the coronal plane improved from 3.1 mm (preoperative) to 1.6 mm (1 year postoperatively). Transtibial pullout repair with the remaining gap could be a viable treatment option for LMPRT with tissue loss, combined with ACL reconstruction.

Shared ACL Bone Tunnel Technique for Repair of Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tears Combined With ACL Reconstruction

Background

Independent transtibial pullout repair is a common surgical technique for repairing lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs). The shared anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) bone tunnel technique is an alternative technique for LMPRT repair combined with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to avoid the establishment of additional bone tunnels.

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes of the shared ACL bone tunnel versus the independent transtibial pullout techniques for LMPRT repair combined with ACLR.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Between March 2014 and February 2018, a total of 48 patients were diagnosed with ACL injury with concomitant LMPRT; 22 patients underwent independent transtibial pullout repair (group T), and 26 patients underwent the shared ACL bone tunnel technique (group S). At a follow-up of >2 years, we compared knee functional recovery using the Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores and the pivot-shift test. Lateral meniscal extrusion, and cartilage degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were also compared. The healing status of the lateral meniscus posterior root was compared using second-look arthroscopy and MRI.

Results

The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in group S compared with group T (98.3 ± 11.1 vs 127.9 ± 17.5 min; P = .001). At final follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in knee functional scores, pivot shift, or grade of cartilage degeneration. Lateral meniscal extrusion was decreased in group S compared with group T (2.41 ± 0.61 vs 1.59 ± 1.35 mm; P = .014). Second-look arthroscopy revealed stable healing in 16 of 18 patients (88.9%) in group S and 10 of 15 patients (66.7%) in group T (P = .38).

Conclusion

Both the shared ACL bone tunnel and the independent transtibial pullout techniques led to satisfactory clinical outcomes. The shared ACL bone tunnel technique is the simpler of the 2 procedures for combined LMPRT repair with ACLR.

Clinical significance and management of meniscal extrusion in different knee pathologies: a comprehensive review of the literature and treatment algorithm

The menisci are crescent-shaped, fibrocartilaginous structures that play a crucial role in the load transition and distribution of the contact forces along the tibiofemoral articulation. Meniscal extrusion (ME) is a radiological finding, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, for which there has been growing interest in recent years. ME, in the coronary plane, is defined as the maximum distance of the most distal end of the meniscus from the border of the tibial plateau, where the tibial eminences are the most prominent, without taking into account the osteophytes. Although there is still controversy in the literature in respect of the optimal cutoff value, a threshold of 3 mm is considered significant. ME has no specific clinical finding or sign and it is encountered in many knee pathologies. It is associated with either rapidly progressive knee osteoarthritis or early onset of knee osteoarthritis and increased morbidity. In this review, we delineate the clinical significance of ME in various knee pathologies, as well as when, why and how it should be managed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to elaborate on these topics.

The lateral meniscal extrusion after repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years

BACKGROUND

A meniscal repair is often performed on radial/flap or longitudinal tears of the lateral meniscus (LM) combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, it is unknown if meniscal extrusion changes over time after repair. This study evaluated whether meniscal extrusion of the LM is maintained after repair or progresses with time using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Among 574 patients who underwent primary anatomic ACLR, 123 patients followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. Forty patients with concomitant radial/flap tears of the LM (group R), 43 with longitudinal LM tears (group L), and 40 with intact LM (group C, matched-control group) were included. Clinical findings (pain, range of motion, swelling, and anterior laxity), lateral joint space on radiograph, and meniscal extrusion on MRI were assessed. Lateral/posterior meniscal extrusions were examined preoperatively, within 3 weeks after surgery, and at the final follow-up, and the absolute values and relative values (the preoperative values as baseline) were assessed respectively.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the clinical and roentgenographic findings among the groups. No difference was observed in the relative values within 3 weeks after surgery among three groups, although the absolute values were larger in the repaired groups than in group C. At the final follow-up, however, the lateral extrusion in group L had progressed significantly, compared with that in group C (P = 0.033), while no significant difference was detected in the lateral extrusion between groups R and C (P = 0.177). The posterior extrusion in groups R and L had progressed significantly compared with that in group C (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LM extrusion could not be improved even immediately after meniscal repair, and it progressed laterally and posteriorly for more than 2 years after surgery.

Kinematic Analysis of Lateral Meniscal Oblique Radial Tears in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees: Untreated Versus Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy

BACKGROUND

Lateral meniscal oblique radial tears (LMORTs) affect joint and meniscal stability in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees.

PURPOSE

To determine the clinically relevant kinematics associated with the most common posterior horn LMORT lesion types, types 3 (LMORT3) and 4 (LMORT4), untreated versus arthroscopic repair versus partial meniscectomy in combination with ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

STUDY

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Sixteen cadaveric knees underwent robotic testing for anterior drawer and pivot-shift simulations at multiple knee flexion angles in ACL-intact and ACL-deficient states, followed by sequential testing of arthroscopic ACLR, LMORT3 lesion, LMORT3 repair, and partial meniscectomy (n = 8). The same testing sequence was performed for LMORT4 lesions (n = 8).

RESULTS

ACLR restored kinematics in ACL-deficient knees to intact levels for all metrics tested. For anterior drawer, ACLR + LMORT3 tear and partial meniscectomy resulted in significantly greater anterior translation compared with ACL-intact at all angles (P < .05) and compared with ACLR at 60° and 90° (P < .014). For pivot shift, compared with ACL-intact knees, ACLR + LMORT3 tear resulted in significantly more anterior translation at 15° (P = .041); and for ACLR + partial meniscectomy, at both 0° and 15° (P < .03). ACLR + LMORT4 tear and partial meniscectomy resulted in significantly greater anterior translation for anterior drawer (P < .04) and pivot-shift testing (P < .05) compared with intact and ACLR knees at all angles tested. ACLR + LMORT3 repair and ACLR + LMORT4 repair restored kinematics to ACLR and intact levels at all angles tested. ACLR + LMORT3 tear (P < .008) and both LMORT4 tear and partial meniscectomy (P < .05) resulted in increased meniscal extrusion compared with intact and ACLR statuses at all tested angles for anterior drawer and pivot shift, while repairs restored meniscal stability to ACLR and intact levels.

CONCLUSION

Untreated LMORT tears increased anterior translation, pivot shift, and meniscal extrusion after ACLR, while partial meniscectomy further exacerbated these detrimental effects in this cadaveric model. In contrast, arthroscopic side-to-side repair of LMORT lesions effectively restored measured knee kinematics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

LMORT lesions are common with ACL tears and adversely affect joint stability and meniscal extrusion. This study highlights the importance of repair of LMORT 3 and 4 lesions at the time of ACLR.

Editorial Commentary: All-Inside Double-Vertical Cross-Suture is an Effective Technique for Knee Meniscus Radial Tear Repair, but There is No Gold-Standard Evaluation Tool for Evaluating Healing and Function of the Repaired Meniscus

Treatment of radial tears of the lateral meniscus is challenging. Previous studies after repairing radial tears showed low healing rates. Various suture techniques are now being developed, and biomechanical and clinical studies using these new techniques are underway. Amid development, the all-inside double vertical cross-suture technique seemed to be effective. However, limited evaluations after meniscal repair might not fully reveal whether the repaired meniscus can maintain its function. Because the best single method that can completely evaluate meniscal healing and its function after repair is still lacking, we should introduce various assessments and consider them in a comprehensive way.