The Beneficial Effect of an Intra-articular Injection of Losartan on Microfracture-Mediated Cartilage Repair Is Dose Dependent

HWJMSC-EVs promote cartilage regeneration and repair via the ITGB1/TGF-β/Smad2/3 axis mediated by microfractures

The current first-line treatment for repairing cartilage defects in clinical practice is the creation of microfractures (MF) to stimulate the release of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); however, this method has many limitations. Recent studies have found that MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) play an important role in tissue regeneration. This study aimed to verify whether MSC-EVs promote cartilage damage repair mediated by MFs and to explore the repair mechanisms. In vitro experiments showed that human umbilical cord Wharton's jelly MSC-EVs (hWJMSC-EVs) promoted the vitality of chondrocytes and the proliferation and differentiation ability of bone marrow-derived MSCs. This was mainly because hWJMSC-EVs carry integrin beta-1 (ITGB1), and cartilage and bone marrow-derived MSCs overexpress ITGB1 after absorbing EVs, thereby activating the transforming growth factor-β/Smad2/3 axis. In a rabbit knee joint model of osteochondral defect repair, the injection of different concentrations of hWJMSC-EVs into the joint cavity showed that a concentration of 50 µg/ml significantly improved the formation of transparent cartilage after MF surgery. Extraction of regenerated cartilage revealed that the changes in ITGB1, transforming growth factor-β, and Smad2/3 were directly proportional to the repair of regenerated cartilage. In summary, this study showed that hWJMSC-EVs promoted cartilage repair after MF surgery.

The association between losartan potassium prescription and postoperative outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: A TriNetX analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure performed to alleviate pain and improve functional outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis who have failed conservative treatments. Arthrofibrosis has been extensively studied due to its negative impact on TKA outcomes. Losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), has the potential to improve TKA outcomes by inhibiting TGF-β and decreasing fibrosis. This study aims to analyze a large-scale, real-world healthcare database to investigate the association between losartan potassium prescription and postoperative outcomes such as readmissions, ED visits, and the need for MUA or revision TKA.

HYPOTHESIS

Based on previous literature and the nature of ARBs, it is expected that the addition of losartan will aid in better outcomes for patients following a primary TKA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, the TriNetX Research Network (TriNetX) database was queried as of June 21, 2023. All patients who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prior to June 21, 2022 were included. Patients were then divided into two cohorts by whether they had an active losartan potassium prescription within the year prior to their surgery to within 90days postoperatively. Patients were then propensity-matched to eliminate differences in demographics and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Losartan TKA patients were 1.18 [OR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90), p<0.001] times less likely to be readmitted within 90days and were 1.15 (OR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96); p=0.009) times less likely to undergo a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) within the 1-year postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of emergency department (ED) visits at 90days postoperatively or revision TKAs at 1year postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, patients with an active losartan prescription prior to TKA had a significantly lower likelihood of readmission within 90days and a lower likelihood of undergoing MUA within the 1-year postoperative period compared to patients not taking losartan. This presents an opportunity for further clinical investigation to explore the value of losartan in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; an observational cohort study.

Intra-articular injection of ascorbic acid enhances microfracture-mediated cartilage repair

Previous studies have confirmed that ascorbic acid (AA) can promote cartilage repair and improve cartilage differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. However, the use of microfracture (MFX) combined with AA to repair cartilage damage has not been studied. This study established a rabbit animal model and treated cartilage injury with different concentrations of AA combined with MFX. Macroscopic observations, histological analysis, immunohistochemical analysis and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of TGF-β, AKT/Nrf2, and VEGF mRNA expression were performed. The results showed that intra-articular injection of AA had a positive effect on cartilage repair mediated by microfractures. Moreover, 10 mg/ml AA was the most effective at promoting cartilage repair mediated by microfractures. Intra-articular injection of AA promoted the synthesis of type II collagen and the formation of glycosaminoglycans by downregulating the mRNA expression of TGF-β and VEGF. In summary, this study confirmed that AA could promote cartilage repair after MFX surgery.

Comparison of the ability of exosomes and ectosomes derived from adipose-derived stromal cells to promote cartilage regeneration in a rat osteochondral defect model

BACKGROUND

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) offer promising prospects for stimulating cartilage regeneration. The different formation mechanisms suggest that exosomes and ectosomes possess different biological functions. However, little attention has been paid to the differential effects of EV subsets on cartilage regeneration.

METHODS

Our study compared the effects of the two EVs isolated from adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) on chondrocytes and bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) in vitro. Additionally, we loaded the two EVs into type I collagen hydrogels to optimize their application for the treatment of osteochondral defects in vivo.

RESULTS

In vitro experiments demonstrate that ASC-derived exosomes (ASC-Exos) significantly promoted the proliferation and migration of both cells more effectively than ASC-derived ectosomes (ASC-Ectos). Furthermore, ASC-Exos facilitated a stronger differentiation of BMSCs into chondrogenic cells than ASC-Ectos, but both inhibited chondrocyte apoptosis to a similar extent. In the osteochondral defect model of rats, ASC-Exos promoted cartilage regeneration in situ better than ASC-Ectos. At 8 weeks, the hydrogel containing exosomes group (Gel + Exo group) had higher macroscopic and histological scores, a higher value of trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV), a lower value of trabecular thickness (Tb.Sp), and a better remodeling of extracellular matrix than the hydrogel containing ectosomes group (Gel + Ecto group). At 4 and 8 weeks, the expression of CD206 and Arginase-1 in the Gel + Exo group was significantly higher than that in the Gel + Ecto group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that administering ASC-Exos may be a more effective EV strategy for cartilage regeneration than the administration of ASC-Ectos.

Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on need for operative intervention for idiopathic adhesive capsulitis

Background

The exact pathogenesis of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis (IAC) is not fully understood, but an inflammatory profibrotic cascade, largely mediated by transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF- β1) has been implicated. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) both decrease the activity of TGF-β1. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of ACE-Is or ARBs use on the need for operative intervention in IAC.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients from a single institutional database with IAC, divided into two cohorts, with and without ACE-I and/or ARB use as the primary exposure and a minimum 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of operative intervention including manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and arthroscopic capsular release (ACR). Additional multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations between ACE-I/ARB use and likelihood of undergoing an operative procedure.

Results

A total of 17,645 patients met inclusion criteria, with 5424 patients in the ACE-I/ARB cohort and 12,221 in the non-ACE-I/ARB cohort. Overall, 422 (2.4%) patients underwent surgical treatment, 378 (2.1%) ACR, and 74 (0.4%) MUA. There was no significant difference between cohorts in the frequency of surgical procedures or time to procedure since diagnosis. There were no significant differences between individual ACE-Is or ARBs, although Losartan was found to have a trend of decreased rate of intervention (31.7% vs. 36.8%, P = .209) when compared to patients not on losartan that did not reach statistical significance. Patient factors predictive of undergoing MUA/ACR were diabetes (P = .013), obesity (P < .001), and male sex (P < .001). Increasing patient age reduces the likelihood of undergoing operative intervention, with patients aged 50-70 years (P = .022) and age >70 years (P < .001) demonstrating reduced odds as compared to patients aged <30 years.

Conclusion

Patients with IAC have an overall low (2.4%) rate of requiring surgical intervention. While the antifibrotic mechanism of ACE inhibitors and ARBs did not significantly affect the rate of requiring surgical intervention, male gender, obesity, younger age, and diabetes, all increased the risk for operative intervention. Losartan, specifically, may have a disease modifying effect on IAC that should be investigated with larger controlled trials.

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Have No Significant Relationship With Postoperative Arthrofibrosis After Shoulder Arthroscopy

Purpose

To determine the effect of perioperative angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) on postoperative arthrofibrosis, as defined by requiring manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) or new diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis (AC) following arthroscopic shoulder procedures.

Methods

Patients were retrospectively identified using Current Procedural Terminology surgical billing codes to identify patients who underwent any shoulder arthroscopic procedure at a single urban academic institution from 2012 to 2020 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were excluded if <30 years old at time of surgery, as these patients rarely use ARB and ACEi medications, or if they had pre-existing AC. Demographics, active medication prescriptions at the time of surgery, and medical comorbidities were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the effect of ARB/ACEi on subsequent MUA or AC by 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years.

Results

In total, 5,559 patients were included in the final analysis. A majority of the cohort (53.4%) underwent arthroscopic surgery between the ages of 50 to 69 years. Most patients were male (61.8%) and without obesity (67.3%). In total, 18.9% and 15.0% were taking an ARB or ACEi medication perioperatively, respectively. Within 2 years' postoperatively, 51 patients (0.9%) underwent subsequent ipsilateral MUA, and 174 patients (3.1%) developed AC. Patients taking ARBs had a 17.5% rate of postoperative arthrofibrosis within 2-years compared with 19.1% in those not on ARBs, although this difference was not significant (P = .58). Likewise, no significant difference was found between those taking ACEi versus not (15.0% vs 15.0%, P = .99). Individual generic ARB/ACEi subgroup analysis did not demonstrate any significant associations with rate of postoperative arthrofibrosis (P > .05).

Conclusions

ARBs or ACEi did not significantly affect the rate of postoperative arthrofibrosis following shoulder arthroscopy, however female sex, diabetes mellitus, and Black/African American race were associated with an increased rate of necessitating MUA or developing AC within 2 years postoperatively.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Pharmacological Therapies for Connective Tissue Fibrosis in Orthopaedics

Fibrosis is a common and debilitating pathological process that affects many organ systems and contributes to connective tissue disorders in orthopaedics. Tendons heal after acute and chronic injury through a process of fibrovascular scar tissue formation, and soft tissue joint capsules can be affected after traumatic joint injury, leading to arthrofibrosis. Although the precise underlying mechanisms are still being elucidated, fibrosis is thought to be a consequence of dysregulated immune and cytokine signaling that leads to myofibroblast activation and proliferation and subsequent excessive collagen deposition. Current treatments for connective tissue fibrosis include physical therapy and surgery, but there are no therapies that directly target the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. Many pharmacological agents have been used to successfully target fibrosis in other tissues and organ systems and thus are a promising treatment option to fill this gap. However, limited evidence is available to guide the use of these agents in musculoskeletal connective tissues. This article provides an overview of pharmacological therapies that have potential to treat connective tissue fibrosis in patients with musculoskeletal conditions, along with the current supporting evidence and future uses of each therapy.

The effects of losartan or angiotensin II receptor antagonists on cartilage: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to analyze the latest evidence on the effects of losartan or Ang II receptor antagonists on cartilage repair, with a focus on their clinical relevance.

DESIGN

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to November 12th 2021 to evaluate the effects of losartan or Ang II receptor antagonists on cartilage repair in in vitro studies and in vivo animal studies. Study design, sample characteristics, treatment type, duration, and outcomes were analyzed. The risk of bias and the quality of the eligible studies were assessed using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias assessment tool and Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies (CAMARADES).

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were included in this systematic review. Of the 12 eligible studies, two studies were in vitro human studies, three studies were in vitro animal studies, one study was an in vitro human and animal study, and six studies were in vivo animal studies. The risk bias and quality assessments were predominantly classified as moderate. Since meta-analysis was difficult due to differences in treatment type, dosage, route of administration, and method of outcome assessment among the eligible studies, qualitative evaluation was conducted for each study.

CONCLUSIONS

Both in vitro and in vivo studies provide evidence to demonstrate beneficial effects of Ang II receptor antagonists on osteoarthritis and cartilage defect models across animal species.

Sustained-release losartan from peptide nanofibers promotes chondrogenesis

Introduction: The central pathologic feature of osteoarthritis (OA) is the progressive loss of articular cartilage, which has a limited regenerative capacity. The TGF-β1 inhibitor, losartan, can improve cartilage repair by promoting hyaline rather that fibrous cartilage tissue regeneration. However, there are concerns about side effects associated with oral administration and short retention within the joint following intra-articular injections. To facilitate local and sustained intra-articular losartan delivery we have designed an injectable peptide amphiphile (PA) nanofiber that binds losartan. The aims of this study are to characterize the release kinetics of losartan from two different PA nanofiber compositions followed by testing pro-regenerative bioactivity on chondrocytes. Methods: We tested the impact of electrostatic interactions on nanostructure morphology and release kinetics of the negatively charged losartan molecule from either a positively or negatively charged PA nanofiber. Subsequently, cytotoxicity and bioactivity were evaluated in vitro in both normal and an IL-1β-induced OA chondrocyte model using ATDC5. Results: Both nanofiber systems promoted cell proliferation but that the positively-charged nanofibers also significantly increased glycosaminoglycans production. Furthermore, gene expression analysis suggested that losartan-encapsulated nanofibers had significant anti-inflammatory, anti-degenerative, and cartilage regenerative effects by significantly blocking TGF-β1 in this in vitro system. Discussion: The results of this study demonstrated that positively charged losartan sustained-release nanofibers may be a novel and useful treatment for cartilage regeneration and OA by blocking TGF-β1.

Microenvironmentally optimized 3D-printed TGFβ-functionalized scaffolds facilitate endogenous cartilage regeneration in sheep

Clinically, microfracture is the most commonly applied surgical technique for cartilage defects. However, an increasing number of studies have shown that the clinical improvement remains questionable, and the reason remains unclear. Notably, recent discoveries revealed that signals from regenerated niches play a critical role in determining mesenchymal stem cell fate specification and differentiation. We speculate that a microenvironmentally optimized scaffold that directs mesenchymal stem cell fate will be a good therapeutic strategy for cartilage repair. Therefore, we first explored the deficiency of microfractures in cartilage repair. The microfracture not only induced inflammatory cell aggregation in blood clots but also consisted of loose granulation tissue with increased levels of proteins related to fibrogenesis. We then fabricated a functional cartilage scaffold using two strong bioactive cues, transforming growth factor-β3 and decellularized cartilage extracellular matrix, to modulate the cell fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Additionally, poly(ε-caprolactone) was also coprinted with extracellular matrix-based bioinks to provide early mechanical support. The in vitro studies showed that microenvironmentally optimized scaffolds exert powerful effects on modulating the mesenchymal stem cell fate, such as promoting cell migration, proliferation and chondrogenesis. Importantly, this strategy achieved superior regeneration in sheep via scaffolds with biomechanics (restored well-organized collagen orientation) and antiapoptotic properties (cell death-related genes were also downregulated). In summary, this study provides evidence that microenvironmentally optimized scaffolds improve cartilage regeneration in situ by regulating the microenvironment and support further translation in human cartilage repair. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Although microfracture (MF)-based treatment for chondral defects has been commonly used, critical gaps exist in understanding the biochemistry of MF-induced repaired tissue. More importantly, the clinically unsatisfactory effects of MF treatment have prompted researchers to focus on tissue engineering scaffolds that may have sufficient therapeutic efficacy. In this manuscript, a 3D printing ink containing cartilage tissue-specific extracellular matrix (ECM), methacrylate gelatin (GelMA), and transforming growth factor-β3 (TGF-β3)-embedded polylactic-coglycolic acid (PLGA) microspheres was coprinted with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) to fabricate tissue engineering scaffolds for chondral defect repair. The sustained release of TGF-β3 from scaffolds successfully directed endogenous stem/progenitor cell migration and differentiation. This microenvironmentally optimized scaffold produced improved tissue repair outcomes in the sheep animal model, explicitly guiding more organized neotissue formation and therefore recapitulating the anisotropic structure of native articular cartilage. We hypothesized that the cell-free scaffolds might improve the clinical applicability and become a new therapeutic option for chondral defect repair.

Effects of oral losartan administration on homeostasis of articular cartilage and bone in a rabbit model

Background and aims

Previous work has shown that oral losartan can enhance microfracture-mediated cartilage repair in a rabbit osteochondral defect injury model. In this study, we aimed to determine whether oral losartan would have a detrimental effect on articular cartilage and bone homeostasis in the uninjured sides.

Methods

New Zealand rabbits were divided into 4 groups including normal uninjured (Normal), contralateral uninjured side of osteochondral defect (Defect), osteochondral defect plus microfracture (Microfracture) and osteochondral defect plus microfracture and losartan oral administration (10 mg/kg/day) (Losartan). Rabbits underwent different surgeries and treatment and were sacrificed at 12 weeks. Both side of the normal group and uninjured side of treatment groups tibias were harvested for Micro-CT and histological analysis for cartilage and bone including H&E staining, Herovici's staining (bone and cartilage) Alcian blue and Safranin O staining (cartilage) as well as immunohistochemistry of losartan related signaling pathways molecules for both cartilage and bone.

Results

Our results showed losartan oral treatment at 10 mg/kg/day slightly increase Alcian blue positive matrix as well as decrease collagen type 3 in articular cartilage while having no significant effect on articular cartilage structure, cellularity, and other matrix. Losartan treatment also did not affect angiotensin receptor type 1 (AGTR1), angiotensin receptor type 2 (AGTR2) and phosphorylated transforming factor β1 activated kinase 1 (pTAK1) expression level and pattern in the articular cartilage. Furthermore, losartan treatment did not affect microarchitecture of normal cancellous bone and cortical bone of tibias compared to normal and other groups. Losartan treatment slightly increased osteocalcin positive osteoblasts on the surface of cancellous bone and did not affect bone matrix collagen type 1 content and did not change AGTR1, AGTR2 and pTAK1 signal molecule expression.

Conclusion

Oral losartan used as a microfracture augmentation therapeutic does not have significant effect on uninjured articular cartilage and bone based on our preclinical rabbit model. These results provided further evidence that the current regimen of using losartan as a microfracture augmentation therapeutic is safe with respect to bone and cartilage homeostasis and support clinical trials for its application in human cartilage repair.

Pleiotropic Effects of Simvastatin and Losartan in Preclinical Models of Post-Traumatic Elbow Contracture

Elbow trauma can lead to post-traumatic joint contracture (PTJC), which is characterized by loss of motion associated with capsule/ligament fibrosis and cartilage damage. Unfortunately, current therapies are often unsuccessful or cause complications. This study aimed to determine the effects of prophylactically administered simvastatin (SV) and losartan (LS) in two preclinical models of elbow PTJC: an in vivo elbow-specific rat injury model and an in vitro collagen gel contraction assay. The in vivo elbow rat (n = 3-10/group) injury model evaluated the effects of orally administered SV and LS at two dosing strategies [i.e., low dose/high frequency/short duration (D1) vs. high dose/low frequency/long duration (D2)] on post-mortem elbow range of motion (via biomechanical testing) as well as capsule fibrosis and cartilage damage (via histopathology). The in vitro gel contraction assay coupled with live/dead staining (n = 3-19/group) evaluated the effects of SV and LS at various concentrations (i.e., 1, 10, 100 µM) and durations (i.e., continuous, short, or delayed) on the contractibility and viability of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts [i.e., NIH3T3 fibroblasts with endogenous transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGFβ1)]. In vivo, no drug strategy prevented elbow contracture biomechanically. Histologically, only SV-D2 modestly reduced capsule fibrosis but maintained elevated cellularity and tissue hypertrophy, and both SV strategies lessened cartilage damage. SV modest benefits were localized to the anterior region, not the posterior, of the joint. Neither LS strategy had meaningful benefits in capsule nor cartilage. In vitro, irrespective of the presence of TGFβ1, SV (≥10 μM) prevented gel contraction partly by decreasing cell viability (100 μM). In contrast, LS did not prevent gel contraction or affect cell viability. This study demonstrates that SV, but not LS, might be suitable prophylactic drug therapy in two preclinical models of elbow PTJC. Results provide initial insight to guide future preclinical studies aimed at preventing or mitigating elbow PTJC.

Capsulolabral Adhesions After Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Strategies During Rehabilitation and Return to Sport to Reduce the Risk of Revision

This article will review various strategies such as passive range of motion modalities, active range of motion movements, and pharmacological interventions for the prevention of adhesion formation after hip arthroscopy. Capsulolabral adhesions are a common cause of revision hip arthroscopy for which treatment methods are still evolving. Efforts to prevent and limit their formation postoperatively, including adjuncts such as losartan, as well as the use of consistent passive and active, multiplanar movements, both therapist and continuous passive motion machine assisted, should be considered.