rAAV-Mediated Human FGF-2 Gene Therapy Enhances Osteochondral Repair in a Clinically Relevant Large Animal Model Over Time In Vivo

Role of signaling pathways in age-related orthopedic diseases: focus on the fibroblast growth factor family

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling encompasses a multitude of functions, including regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, morphogenesis, and patterning. FGFs and their receptors (FGFR) are crucial for adult tissue repair processes. Aberrant FGF signal transduction is associated with various pathological conditions such as cartilage damage, bone loss, muscle reduction, and other core pathological changes observed in orthopedic degenerative diseases like osteoarthritis (OA), intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD), osteoporosis (OP), and sarcopenia. In OA and IVDD pathologies specifically, FGF1, FGF2, FGF8, FGF9, FGF18, FGF21, and FGF23 regulate the synthesis, catabolism, and ossification of cartilage tissue. Additionally, the dysregulation of FGFR expression (FGFR1 and FGFR3) promotes the pathological process of cartilage degradation. In OP and sarcopenia, endocrine-derived FGFs (FGF19, FGF21, and FGF23) modulate bone mineral synthesis and decomposition as well as muscle tissues. FGF2 and other FGFs also exert regulatory roles. A growing body of research has focused on understanding the implications of FGF signaling in orthopedic degeneration. Moreover, an increasing number of potential targets within the FGF signaling have been identified, such as FGF9, FGF18, and FGF23. However, it should be noted that most of these discoveries are still in the experimental stage, and further studies are needed before clinical application can be considered. Presently, this review aims to document the association between the FGF signaling pathway and the development and progression of orthopedic diseases. Besides, current therapeutic strategies targeting the FGF signaling pathway to prevent and treat orthopedic degeneration will be evaluated.

Emerging technology has a brilliant future: the CRISPR-Cas system for senescence, inflammation, and cartilage repair in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA), known as one of the most common types of aseptic inflammation of the musculoskeletal system, is characterized by chronic pain and whole-joint lesions. With cellular and molecular changes including senescence, inflammatory alterations, and subsequent cartilage defects, OA eventually leads to a series of adverse outcomes such as pain and disability. CRISPR-Cas-related technology has been proposed and explored as a gene therapy, offering potential gene-editing tools that are in the spotlight. Considering the genetic and multigene regulatory mechanisms of OA, we systematically review current studies on CRISPR-Cas technology for improving OA in terms of senescence, inflammation, and cartilage damage and summarize various strategies for delivering CRISPR products, hoping to provide a new perspective for the treatment of OA by taking advantage of CRISPR technology.

Osteoarthritis versus psoriasis arthritis: Physiopathology, cellular signaling, and therapeutic strategies

Osteoarthritis and psoriasis arthritis are two degenerative forms of arthritis that share similar yet also different manifestations at the histological, cellular, and clinical levels. Rheumatologists have marked them as two entirely distinct arthropathies. Given recent discoveries in disease initiation and progression, potential mechanisms, cellular signaling pathways, and ongoing clinical therapeutics, there are now more opportunities for discovering osteoarthritis drugs. This review summarized the osteoarthritis and psoriasis arthritis signaling pathways, crosstalk between BMP, WNT, TGF-β, VEGF, TLR, and FGF signaling pathways, biomarkers, and anatomical pathologies. Through bench research, we demonstrated that regenerative medicine is a promising alternative for treating osteoarthritis by highlighting significant scientific discoveries on entheses, multiple signaling blockers, and novel molecules such as immunoglobulin new antigen receptors targeted for potential drug evaluation. Furthermore, we offered valuable therapeutic approaches with a multidisciplinary strategy to treat patients with osteoarthritis or psoriasis arthritis in the coming future in the clinic.

The evolving landscape of gene therapy strategies for the treatment of osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

Significant advances have been made in our understanding of osteoarthritis (OA) pathogenesis; however, no disease-modifying therapies have been identified. This review will summarize the gene therapy landscape, its initial successes for OA, and possible challenges using recent studies and examples of gene therapies in clinical trials.

DESIGN

This narrative review has three major sections: 1) vector systems for OA gene therapy, 2) current and emerging targets for OA gene therapy, and 3) considerations and future directions.

RESULTS

Gene therapy is the strategy by which nucleic acids are delivered to treat and reverse disease progression. Specificity and prolonged expression of these nucleic acids are achieved by manipulating promoters, genes, and vector systems. Certain vector systems also allow for the development of combinatorial nucleic acid strategies that can be delivered in a single intraarticular injection - an approach likely required to treat the complexity of OA pathogenesis. Several viral and non-viral vector-based gene therapies are in clinical trials for OA, and many more are being evaluated in the preclinical arena.

CONCLUSIONS

In a post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, the future of gene therapy for OA is certainly promising; however, the majority of preclinical validation continues to focus heavily on post-traumatic models and changes in only cartilage and subchondral bone. To ensure successful translation, new candidates in the preclinical arena should be examined against all joint tissues as well as pain using diverse models of injury-, obesity-, and age-induced disease. Lastly, consideration must be given to strategies for repeat administration and the cost of treatment owing to the chronic nature of OA.

Locally Directed Recombinant Adeno- Associated Virus-Mediated IGF-1 Gene Therapy Enhances Osteochondral Repair and Counteracts Early Osteoarthritis In Vivo

BACKGROUND

Restoration of osteochondral defects is critical, because osteoarthritis (OA) can arise.

HYPOTHESIS

Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) via recombinant adeno-associated viral (rAAV) vectors (rAAV-IGF-1) would improve osteochondral repair and reduce parameters of early perifocal OA in sheep after 6 months in vivo.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Osteochondral defects were created in the femoral trochlea of adult sheep and treated with rAAV-IGF-1 or rAAV-lacZ (control) (24 defects in 6 knees per group). After 6 months in vivo, osteochondral repair and perifocal OA were assessed by well-established macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical scoring systems as well as biochemical and micro-computed tomography evaluations.

RESULTS

Application of rAAV-IGF-1 led to prolonged (6 months) IGF-1 overexpression without adverse effects, maintaining a significantly superior overall cartilage repair, together with significantly improved defect filling, extracellular matrix staining, cellular morphology, and surface architecture compared with rAAV-lacZ. Expression of type II collagen significantly increased and that of type I collagen significantly decreased. Subchondral bone repair and tidemark formation were significantly improved, and subchondral bone plate thickness and subarticular spongiosa mineral density returned to normal. The OA parameters of perifocal structure, cell cloning, and matrix staining were significantly better preserved upon rAAV-IGF-1 compared with rAAV-lacZ. Novel mechanistic associations between parameters of osteochondral repair and OA were identified.

CONCLUSION

Local rAAV-mediated IGF-1 overexpression enhanced osteochondral repair and ameliorated parameters of perifocal early OA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

IGF-1 gene therapy may be beneficial in repair of focal osteochondral defects and prevention of perifocal OA.

Current therapies for osteoarthritis and prospects of CRISPR-based genome, epigenome, and RNA editing in osteoarthritis treatment

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common degenerative joint diseases worldwide, causing pain, disability, and decreased quality of life. The balance between regeneration and inflammation-induced degradation results in multiple etiologies and complex pathogenesis of OA. Currently, there is a lack of effective therapeutic strategies for OA treatment. With the development of CRISPR-based genome, epigenome, and RNA editing tools, OA treatment has been improved by targeting genetic risk factors, activating chondrogenic elements, and modulating inflammatory regulators. Supported by cell therapy and in vivo delivery vectors, genome, epigenome, and RNA editing tools may provide a promising approach for personalized OA therapy. This review summarizes CRISPR-based genome, epigenome, and RNA editing tools that can be applied to the treatment of OA and provides insights into the development of CRISPR-based therapeutics for OA treatment. Moreover, in-depth evaluations of the efficacy and safety of these tools in human OA treatment are needed.

Recent development in multizonal scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration

Osteochondral (OC) repair is an extremely challenging topic due to the complex biphasic structure and poor intrinsic regenerative capability of natural osteochondral tissue. In contrast to the current surgical approaches which yield only short-term relief of symptoms, tissue engineering strategy has been shown more promising outcomes in treating OC defects since its emergence in the 1990s. In particular, the use of multizonal scaffolds (MZSs) that mimic the gradient transitions, from cartilage surface to the subchondral bone with either continuous or discontinuous compositions, structures, and properties of natural OC tissue, has been gaining momentum in recent years. Scrutinizing the latest developments in the field, this review offers a comprehensive summary of recent advances, current hurdles, and future perspectives of OC repair, particularly the use of MZSs including bilayered, trilayered, multilayered, and gradient scaffolds, by bringing together onerous demands of architecture designs, material selections, manufacturing techniques as well as the choices of growth factors and cells, each of which possesses its unique challenges and opportunities.

New treatment for osteoarthr: pbad014itis: Gene therapy

Osteoarthritis is a complex degenerative disease that affects the entire joint tissue. Currently, non-surgical treatments for osteoarthritis focus on relieving pain. While end-stage osteoarthritis can be treated with arthroplasty, the health and financial costs associated with surgery have forced the search for alternative non-surgical treatments to delay the progression of osteoarthritis and promote cartilage repair. Unlike traditional treatment, the gene therapy approach allows for long-lasting expression of therapeutic proteins at specific sites. In this review, we summarize the history of gene therapy in osteoarthritis, outlining the common expression vectors (non-viral, viral), the genes delivered (transcription factors, growth factors, inflammation-associated cytokines, non-coding RNAs) and the mode of gene delivery (direct delivery, indirect delivery). We highlight the application and development prospects of the gene editing technology CRISPR/Cas9 in osteoarthritis. Finally, we identify the current problems and possible solutions in the clinical translation of gene therapy for osteoarthritis.

Intra-articular injection of rAAV-hFGF-2 ameliorates monosodium iodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis in rats via inhibiting TLR-4 signaling and activating TIMP-1

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic debilitating degenerative disorder leading to structural, and functional anomaly of the joint. The present study tests the hypothesis that overexpression of the basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) via direct rAAV-mediated gene transfer suppresses monosodium iodoacetate (MIA)-induced knee OA in rats relative to control (reporter rAAV-lacZ vector) gene transfer by intra-articular injection. Rats were treated with 20 μl rAAV-hFGF-2 on weekly basis; on days 7, 14, and 21 after single intra-articular injection of MIA (3 mg/50 μl saline). FGF-2 reduced knee joint swelling and improved motor performance and muscle coordination as evidenced by increased distance travelled, mean speed, rearing frequency in open field test (OFT) as well as fall-off latency in rotarod test together with reduced immobility time in OFT. Moreover, FGF-2 attenuated MIA-related radiological and histological alterations. Indeed, FGF-2 decreased knee joint inflammatory biomarker as demonstrated by reduced mRNA expression of toll like receptor (TLR)-4 and its downstream mediators such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) and high motility group box (HMGB) 1. In parallel, FGF-2 attenuated knee joint degradation biomarkers as reflected by the downregulation of ADAMTS-5 mRNA expression and matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP-13) content together with the up-regulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 mRNA expression. These findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for FGF-2 against MIA-induced knee OA in rats via inhibition of TLR4 signaling and activating TIMP-1, resulting in down-regulation of ADAMTS-5 and MMP-13.

Gene Delivery to Chondrocytes

Delivering genes to chondrocytes offers new possibilities both clinically, for treating conditions that affect cartilage, and in the laboratory, for studying the biology of chondrocytes. Advances in gene therapy have created a number of different viral and non-viral vectors for this purpose. These vectors may be deployed in an ex vivo fashion, where chondrocytes are genetically modified outside the body, or by in vivo delivery where the vector is introduced directly into the body; in the case of articular and meniscal cartilage in vivo delivery is typically by intra-articular injection. Ex vivo delivery is favored in strategies for enhancing cartilage repair as these can be piggy-backed on existing cell-based technologies, such as autologous chondrocyte implantation, or used in conjunction with marrow-stimulating techniques such as microfracture. In vivo delivery to articular chondrocytes has proved more difficult, because the dense, anionic, extra-cellular matrix of cartilage limits access to the chondrocytes embedded within it. As Grodzinsky and colleagues have shown, the matrix imposes strict limits on the size and charge of particles able to diffuse through the entire depth of articular cartilage. Empirical observations suggest that the larger viral vectors, such as adenovirus (~100 nm), are unable to transduce chondrocytes in situ following intra-articular injection. However, adeno-associated virus (AAV; ~25 nm) is able to do so in horse joints. AAV is presently in clinical trials for arthritis gene therapy, and it will be interesting to see whether human chondrocytes are also transduced throughout the depth of cartilage by AAV following a single intra-articular injection. Viral vectors have been used to deliver genes to the intervertebral disk but there has been little research on gene transfer to chondrocytes in other cartilaginous tissues such as nasal, auricular or tracheal cartilage.

Recent advances in gene therapy for bone tissue engineering

Autografting, a major treatment for bone fractures, has potential risks related to the required surgery and disease transmission. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are the most common osteogenic factors used for bone-healing applications. However, BMP delivery can have shortcomings such as a short half-life and the high cost of manufacturing the recombinant proteins. Gene delivery methods have demonstrated promising alternative strategies for producing BMPs or other osteogenic factors using engineered cells. These approaches can also enable temporal overexpression and local production of the therapeutic genes in the target tissues. This review addresses recent progress on engineered viral, non-viral, and RNA-mediated gene delivery systems that are being used for bone repair and regeneration. Advances in clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 genome engineering for bone tissue regeneration also is discussed.

Effects of rAAV-mediated overexpression of bone morphogenetic protein 3 (BMP-3) on the chondrogenic fate of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells

Implantation of genetically modified chondrogenically competent human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) is an attractive strategy to improve cartilage repair. The goal of this study was to examine the potential benefits of transferring a sequence coding for the bone morphogenetic protein 3 (BMP-3) that modulates bone and cartilage formation, using recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors on the chondroreparative activities of hMSCs. Undifferentiated and chondrogenically induced primary human MSCs were treated with an rAAV-hBMP-3 construct to evaluate its effects on the proliferative, metabolic, and chondrogenic activities of the cells compared with control (reporter rAAV-lacZ vector) condition. Effective BMP-3 expression was noted both in undifferentiated and chondrogenically differentiated cells in the presence of rAAV-hBMP-3 relative to rAAV-lacZ, stimulating cell proliferation and extracellular matrix (proteoglycans, type-II collagen) deposition together with higher levels of chondrogenic SOX9 expression. rAAV-hBMP-3 also advantageously decreased terminal differentiation, hypertrophy, and osteogenesis (type-I/-X collagen and alkaline phosphatase expression), with reduced levels of osteoblast-related RUNX-2 transcription factor and β-catenin (osteodifferentiation mediator) and enhanced PTHrP expression (inhibitor of hypertrophic maturation, calcification, and bone formation). This study shows the advantage of modifying hMSCs with rAAV-hBMP-3 to trigger adapted chondroreparative activities as a source of improved cells for transplantation protocols in cartilage defects.

Anti-fibrotic effects of pharmacologic FGF-2: a review of recent literature

Fibrosis is a process of pathological tissue repair that replaces damaged, formerly functional tissue with a non-functional, collagen-rich scar. Complications of fibrotic pathologies, which can arise in numerous organs and from numerous conditions, result in nearly half of deaths in the developed world. Despite this, therapies that target fibrosis at its mechanistic roots are still notably lacking. The ubiquity of the occurrence of fibrosis in myriad organs emphasizes the fact that there are shared mechanisms underlying fibrotic conditions, which may serve as common therapeutic targets for multiple fibrotic diseases of varied organs. Thus, study of the basic science of fibrosis and of anti-fibrotic modalities is critical to therapeutic development and may have potential to translate across organs and disease states. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) is a broadly studied member of the fibroblast growth factors, a family of multipotent cytokines implicated in diverse cellular and tissue processes, which has previously been recognized for its anti-fibrotic potential. However, the mechanisms underlying this potential are not fully understood, nor is the potential for its use to ameliorate fibrosis in diverse pathologies and tissues. Presented here is a review of recent literature that sheds further light on these questions, with the hopes of inspiring further research into the mechanisms underlying the anti-fibrotic activities of FGF-2, as well as the disease conditions for which pharmacologic FGF-2 might be a useful option in the future.

Roles of the fibroblast growth factor signal transduction system in tissue injury repair

Following injury, tissue autonomously initiates a complex repair process, resulting in either partial recovery or regeneration of tissue architecture and function in most organisms. Both the repair and regeneration processes are highly coordinated by a hierarchy of interplay among signal transduction pathways initiated by different growth factors, cytokines and other signaling molecules under normal conditions. However, under chronic traumatic or pathological conditions, the reparative or regenerative process of most tissues in different organs can lose control to different extents, leading to random, incomplete or even flawed cell and tissue reconstitution and thus often partial restoration of the original structure and function, accompanied by the development of fibrosis, scarring or even pathogenesis that could cause organ failure and death of the organism. Ample evidence suggests that the various combinatorial fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and receptor signal transduction systems play prominent roles in injury repair and the remodeling of adult tissues in addition to embryonic development and regulation of metabolic homeostasis. In this review, we attempt to provide a brief update on our current understanding of the roles, the underlying mechanisms and clinical application of FGFs in tissue injury repair.

The Role of Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) Signaling in Tissue Repair and Regeneration

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are a large family of secretory molecules that act through tyrosine kinase receptors known as FGF receptors. They play crucial roles in a wide variety of cellular functions, including cell proliferation, survival, metabolism, morphogenesis, and differentiation, as well as in tissue repair and regeneration. The signaling pathways regulated by FGFs include RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)–protein kinase B (AKT), phospholipase C gamma (PLCγ), and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT). To date, 22 FGFs have been discovered, involved in different functions in the body. Several FGFs directly or indirectly interfere with repair during tissue regeneration, in addition to their critical functions in the maintenance of pluripotency and dedifferentiation of stem cells. In this review, we summarize the roles of FGFs in diverse cellular processes and shed light on the importance of FGF signaling in mechanisms of tissue repair and regeneration.

Robustness of Digital PCR and Real-Time PCR in Transgene Detection for Gene-Doping Control

Gene doping is banned in human sports, horseracing, and equestrian sports. One possible form of gene doping is to administer exogenous genes, called transgenes. Several transgene detection methods based on quantitative PCR have been developed. In this study, we investigated the robustness of digital PCR and real-time PCR in transgene detection using primers and probes that matched (P-true) or incompletely matched (P-false) the template DNA. Fluorescence intensity was significantly reduced when substituted probes were used compared to that using the matched probe in both digital and real-time PCR assays. Digital PCR yielded a similar copy number regardless of the probe (P-true: 1230.7, P-false: 1229.7), whereas real-time PCR revealed a decrease in sensitivity based on C_q values (P-true: 23.5, P-false: 29.7). When substituted primers were used, the detected copy number decreased in the digital PCR assay, and the C_q value in real-time PCR was much higher. Interestingly, digital PCR copy numbers improved by performing PCR at a low annealing temperature, even if a substituted probe was used. Thus, when primer and probe sequences did not completely match the template transgene, digital PCR was relatively robust, but real-time PCR was less sensitive. Although PCR specificity may be reduced, PCR sensitivity can be improved by lowering the annealing temperature. If the target sequence is substituted to escape doping detection, it may be desirable to set the annealing temperature lower and use a more robust method, such as digital PCR, to increase the detection of positive cases, which will also result in fewer false-negative results.