Predictive Factors for Lateral Hinge Fracture in Medial Closing Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy

Setting hinge position distal to the proximal margin of the distal lateral femur reduces the maximum principal strains of the hinge area and risk of hinge fractures

Purpose

The optimal hinge position to prevent hinge fractures in medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) based on the biomechanical background has not yet been well examined. This study aimed to examine the appropriate hinge position in MCWDFO using finite element (FE) analysis to prevent hinge fractures.

Methods

Computer-aided design (CAD) models were created using composite replicate femurs. FE models of the MCWDFO with a 5° wedge were created with three different hinge positions: (A) 5 mm proximal to the proximal margin of the lateral epicondylar region, (B) proximal margin level and (C) 5 mm distal to the proximal margin level. The maximum and minimum principal strains in the cortical bone were calculated for each model. To validate the FE analysis, biomechanical tests were performed using composite replicate femurs with the same hinge position models as those in the FE analysis.

Results

In the FE analysis, the maximum principal strains were in the order of Models A > B > C. The highest value of maximum principal strain was observed in the area proximal to the hinge. In the biomechanical test, hinge fractures occurred in the area proximal to the hinge in Models A and B, whereas the gap closed completely without hinge fractures in Model C. Fractures occurred in an area similar to where the highest maximal principal strain was observed in the FE analysis.

Conclusion

Distal to the proximal margin of the lateral epicondylar region is an appropriate hinge position in MCWDFO to prevent hinge fractures.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

Impact of support instruments in medial closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy: a finite element analysis

INTRODUCTION

Medial closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) is a valuable treatment approach for lateral knee osteoarthritis with femoral valgus deformity. Improved results have been reported with the upgrade of surgical techniques and locking plates. However, the risk of nonunion and loss of correction increases in cases of lateral hinge fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical impact of hinge fractures and support instruments in MCWDFO using finite element analysis (FEA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five femur models were developed using Mechanical Finder 11.0 FEA software. We simulated the following models: only a medial locking plate (MLP) (group A); an MLP with a lateral support screw (group B); and an MLP with a lateral support plate (group C). The equivalent stress around the hinge was evaluated and the percentage of the plastic deformation zone was calculated for the hinge area in the no-hinge fracture model. The equivalent stress of the MLP and the degree of displacement were calculated using the hinge fracture model.

RESULTS

The percentages of the plastic deformation zone in groups A, B, and C were 18.0 ± 11.7%, 3.3 ± 2.4%, and 2.3 ± 2.8%, respectively. The percentages tended to be lower in groups B and C than in group A. In the hinge fracture model, the mean equivalent stress of the MLP in group C was significantly less than that in group A. In terms of the mean degree of displacement, group A showed more than 1 mm of displacement, which was significantly larger than that of the other groups.

CONCLUSION

The support instruments provided stability to the hinge site and reduced the equivalent stress of the main plate in the MCWDFO with hinge fractures. No significant difference was observed between the two instruments in terms of stability.