Nonextruded Grafts Result in Better Cartilage Quality After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: Quantitative 3-T MRI T2 Mapping

Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Shows a Long-Term Chondroprotective Effect on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging T2 Mapping at 7-Year Minimum Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term chondroprotective effect of lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 mapping.

METHODS

In patients who underwent isolated lateral MAT, quantitative MRI T2 mapping was conducted preoperatively and postoperatively with at minimum follow-up of 7 years to assess the articular cartilage status. On the sagittal section image bisecting the lateral femoral condyle, the weight-bearing portions of the femoral and tibial articular cartilage were divided into 3 segments each-6 segments in total-based on the meniscal coverage area. The regions-of-interest analyses were performed on the 6 segments to measure the mean T2 value. Then the whole layer was divided into deep and superficial layers for further zonal analysis. The longitudinal change in T2 values was statistically analyzed using paired t-tests. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Lysholm score.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were included in the study, with the MRI follow-up period of a minimum of 7 years (mean: 8.9 ± 1.3 years; range: 7.0-11.2 years). The mean T2 value of the whole layer showed significant improvement in all segments of the femoral cartilage and the posterior segment of tibial cartilage. In the zonal analysis, the mean T2 value of the tibial cartilage showed significant improvement in the superficial layer of the mid to posterior portion, while the deep layer remained stable. In contrast, the mean T2 value of the femoral cartilage showed significant improvement in the superficial and deep layers in all segments. The mean Lysholm score significantly improved from 62.6 ± 12.8 to 90.9 ± 10.5 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that MAT appears to have a long-term chondroprotective effect on the articular cartilage as judged by quantitative T2 mapping.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅳ, case series.

Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Results in Both Pain Relief and Chondroprotection

Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) effectively alleviates symptoms of the meniscus deficiency. Thus, MAT is a widely accepted and recommended treatment for individuals with unicompartmental pain due to meniscus deficiency. Long-term follow-up studies have indicated that MAT yields favorable clinical outcomes, demonstrating high survivorship and low rates of serious complications. In addition, the ability of MAT to function akin to the native meniscus and shield the knee cartilage from osteoarthritis has been a subject of ongoing investigation, and recent direct magnetic resonance imaging evidence shows long-term chondroprotection following MAT. Cartilage lesions worsen during the meniscus deficiency period. Consequently, delaying MAT until patients become more symptomatic may lead to poor outcomes and low graft survivorship due to concomitant cartilage lesions. These findings prompt a reevaluation of the purpose and timing of MAT decisions for meniscectomy patients, suggesting a more proactive approach to recommending MAT, particularly for patients at high risk of postmeniscectomy syndrome and osteoarthritis progression.

Single-incision bone bridge lateral meniscus allograft transplantation: preserving neurovascular safety with promising results for posterior horn distortion and graft maturation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the graft maturation and safety of single-incision bone bridge lateral meniscus allograft transplantation (LMAT).

METHODS

This study involved 35 patients who underwent LMAT between 2019 and 2020. All patients completed at least 2 years of follow-up (median 34 months; range 24-43) and underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the trajectory safety of the leading suture passer and all-inside suture instrument (Fast-Fix). Graft status was evaluated according to the Stoller classification.

RESULTS

Based on preoperative MRI measurements, the expected trajectory of the leading suture passer did not transect the common peroneal nerve (CPN), with the closest distance between the expected trajectory and CPN being 1.4 mm and the average distance being 6.8 ± 3.2 mm. The average distance from the lateral meniscal posterior horn (LMPH) to the popliteal neurovascular bundle (PNVB) was 7.4 ± 2.6 mm and the nearest was 4.8 mm. The expected trajectory of the all-inside suturing instrument did not transect the PNVB when the distance was at least 12 mm, from the most lateral margin of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Grade 3 signal intensity in the posterior third of the allograft on MRI was observed in 6 of 35 (17.1%) patients. Amongst the grade 3 signal intensities in the posterior one-third of the allografts, 3 of the 35 (8.5%) LMATs had a distorted contour.

CONCLUSION

The single-incision bone bridge LMAT technique introduced in this study is a convenient approach that preserves neurovascular safety and provides good results for the distortion of the posterior horn of the allograft and graft maturation. The safety zone for the penetrating devices during the procedure extended from 12 mm laterally to the most lateral margin of the PCL to the medial margin of the popliteal hiatus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Effect of Injury to the Lateral Meniscotibial Ligament and Meniscofibular Ligament on Meniscal Extrusion: Biomechanical Evaluation of the Capsulodesis and Centralization Techniques in a Porcine Knee Model

Background

Previous biomechanical studies of the meniscotibial ligament have determined that it contributes to meniscal stability. An injury to it can cause the meniscus to extrude, and reconstruction of that ligament significantly reduces extrusion.

Purpose

To assess the biomechanical effects of sectioning the lateral meniscotibial ligament (LMTL) and the meniscofibular ligament (MFL) with respect to the radial mobility of the lateral meniscus and to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the capsulodesis and centralization techniques.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

The lateral meniscus of 22 porcine knees was evaluated. They were mounted on a testing apparatus to apply muscle and ground-reaction forces. The meniscus was evaluated at 30° and 60° of knee flexion using 2 markers placed on the posterior cruciate ligament and the lateral meniscus after applying an axial compression of 200 N to the knee joint. Measurements were recorded under 5 conditions: intact lateral meniscus, injury of the LMTL, subsequent injury of the MFL, the use of the open capsulodesis technique, and the reconstruction of the LMTL and the MFL with the centralization technique.

Results

The distance between the 2 markers was significantly greater in the extrusion group (combined lesion of the LMTL and MFL) than in the intact or reconstruction groups (capsulodesis and centralization techniques; P < .001 in all cases). In the cases of load application, no significant differences were observed between the control group (intact meniscus) and the groups on which the reconstruction techniques were performed. There were also no differences when comparing the results obtained between both reconstruction techniques. In all settings, the distance between the 2 markers increased with the increase in the knee flexion angle.

Conclusion

In a porcine model, the LMTL and the MFL participated as restrictors of the radial mobility of the lateral meniscus during loading. Their injury caused a significant increase in lateral meniscal extrusion, and the centralization and the capsulodesis procedures were able to reduce extrusion.

Clinical Relevance

This study demonstrates the capacity of the LMTL and the MFL to restrict the radial mobility of the lateral meniscus during loading and how it is affected when they are injured.

The Principles of Knee Joint Preservation: Operative Treatment Strategies

➤ Joint alignment, meniscal status, and ligament stability are codependent factors involved in knee joint preservation, and any injury or imbalance can impact the knee articular cartilage status and can result in adverse clinical outcomes.➤ Cartilage preservation procedures in the knee will not result in optimal outcomes if there is joint malalignment, meniscal deficiency, or ligamentous instability.➤ Lower-extremity varus or valgus malalignment is a risk factor for the failure of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It represents an indication for a high tibial osteotomy or distal femoral osteotomy in the setting of failed ACL reconstruction, and may even be considered in patients who have an initial ACL injury and severe malalignment.➤ An elevated posterior tibial slope increases the risk of failure of ACL reconstruction, whereas a decreased posterior tibial slope increases the risk of failure of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.