Knee extension and its relationship to the slope of the intercondylar roof. Implications for positioning the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

Clinico-Radiological Correlation Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency and Hyperextension of the Knee Joint: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primarily restricts anterior sliding of the tibia over the fixed femur, thereby also postulating to prevent hyperextension of the knee joint. The main objective of our study was to identify the role of the ACL in the prevention of knee hyperextension and to quantify the amount of hyperextension caused by an ACL tear, apart from its well-established role in the prevention of anterior tibial translation on the fixed femur.

METHODS

 This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Eighty patients with unilateral ACL tears were assessed clinico-radiologically in the preoperative period to quantify the knee hyperextension, which was then compared with the uninjured contralateral knee of the same patient. Posterior tibial slope and notch width index were also assessed to rule out bias in our study.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients in our study was 27.3 years. Out of 80 patients, 70 were male and 10 were female. The Pearson coefficient for clinically and radiologically assessed hyperextension was 0.919 (p-value 0.001) and 0.910 (p-value 0.001), respectively. Posterior tibial slope and notch width index assessment showed Pearson coefficients of -0.018 (p-value 0.887) and -0.068 (p-value 0.547), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Anterior cruciate ligament complete tear or deficiency produces knee hyperextension, which varies from patient to patient. Though the amount of hyperextension produced is mild (less than five degrees in most patients), it can cause a significant amount of knee instability. Hence, correction of knee hyperextension is crucial while performing ACL reconstruction.

3D assessment of graft malposition after ACL reconstruction: Comparison of native and 11o'clock ligament orientations

BACKGROUND

Femoral tunnel malposition makes up the majority of technical failures for ACL reconstructive surgery. The goal of this study was to develop adolescent knee models that accurately predict anterior tibial translation when undergoing a Lachman and pivot shift test with the ACL in the 11o'clock femoral malposition (Level of Evidence: IV).

METHODS

FEBio was used to build 22 subject-specific tibiofemoral joint finite element representations. To simulate the two clinical tests, the models were subject to loading and boundary conditions established in the literature. Clinical, historical control data were used to validate the predicted anterior tibial translations.

RESULTS

A 95% confidence interval showed that with the ACL in the 11o'clock malposition, the simulated Lachman and pivot shift tests produced anterior tibial translations that were not statistically different from the in vivo data. The 11o'clock finite element knee models resulted in greater anterior displacement than those with the native (approximately 10o'clock) ACL position. The difference in anterior tibial translation between the native and 11o'clock ACL orientations was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Clinically, by understanding the impact that ACL orientation has in anterior tibial displacement biomechanics, surgical interventions can be improved to prevent technical errors from occurring. The integration of this methodology into surgical practice not only allows for anatomical visualization prior to surgery, but also creates the opportunity to optimize graft placement, thus improving post-surgical outcomes.

Comparison of side-cutting maneuvers versus low impact baseball swing on knee ligament loading in adolescent populations

BACKGROUND

High impact sports are associated with an increased incidence rate for knee ligament injuries, specifically pertaining to the anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament. What is less clear is (i) the extent to which high impact activities preferentially load the anterior cruciate ligament versus the medial collateral ligament, and (ii) whether both ligaments experience similar stretch ratios during high loading scenarios. Therefore, the goal of this project was to assess how different loading conditions experienced through more at-risk sporting maneuvers influence the relative displacements of the anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament. The focus of the study was on adolescent patients - a group that has largely been overlooked when studying knee ligament biomechanics.

METHODS

Through kinetic knee data obtained through motion capture experimentation, two different loading conditions (high vs low impact) were applied to 22 specimen-specific adolescent finite element knee models to investigate the biomechanical impact various sporting maneuvers place on the knee ligaments.

FINDINGS

The high impact side cutting maneuver resulted in 102% and 47% increases in ligament displacement compared to the low impact baseball swing (p < 0.05) for both the anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament.

INTERPRETATION

Quantifying biomechanical risks that sporting activities place on adolescent subjects provides physicians with insight into knee ligament vulnerability. More specifically, knowing the risks that various sports place on ligaments helps guide the selection of sports for at-risk patients (especially those who have undergone knee ligament surgery).

ACL Size, but Not Signal Intensity, Is Influenced by Sex, Body Size, and Knee Anatomy

Background:

Little is known about sex-based differences in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tissue quality in vivo or the association of ACL size (ie, volume) and tissue quality (ie, normalized signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) with knee anatomy.

Hypothesis:

We hypothesized that (1) women have smaller ACLs and greater ACL normalized signal intensity compared with men, and (2) ACL size and normalized signal intensity are associated with age, activity levels, body mass index (BMI), bicondylar width, intercondylar notch width, and posterior slope of the lateral tibial plateau.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Knee MRI scans of 108 unique ACL-intact knees (19.7 ± 5.5 years, 62 women) were used to quantify the ACL signal intensity (normalized to cortical bone), ligament volume, mean cross-sectional area, and length. Independent t tests were used to compare the MRI-based ACL parameters between sexes. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to investigate the associations between normalized signal intensity and size with age, activity levels, BMI, bicondylar width, notch width, and posterior slope of the lateral tibial plateau.

Results:

Compared with men, women had significantly smaller mean ACL volume (men vs women: 2028 ± 472 vs 1591 ± 405 mm³), cross-sectional area (49.4 ± 9.6 vs 41.5 ± 8.6 mm²), and length (40.8 ± 2.8 vs 38.1 ± 3.1 mm) (P < .001 for all), even after adjusting for BMI and bicondylar width. There was no difference in MRI signal intensity between men and women (1.15 ± 0.24 vs 1.12 ± 0.24, respectively; P = .555). BMI, bicondylar width, and intercondylar notch width were independently associated with a larger ACL (R² > 0.16, P < .001). Younger age and steeper lateral tibial slope were independently associated with shorter ACL length (R² > 0.03, P < .04). The combination of BMI and bicondylar width was predictive of ACL volume and mean cross-sectional area (R² < 0.3). The combination of BMI, bicondylar width, and lateral tibial slope was predictive of ACL length (R² = 0.39). Neither quantified patient characteristics nor anatomic variables were associated with signal intensity.

Conclusion:

Men had larger ACLs compared with women even after adjusting for BMI and knee size (bicondylar width). No sex difference was observed in signal intensity, suggesting no difference in tissue quality. The association of the intercondylar notch width and lateral tibial slope with ACL size suggests that the influence of these anatomic features on ACL injury risk may be partially explained by their effect on ACL size.

Registration:

NCT02292004 and NCT02664545 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

The risk of graft impingement still exists in modern ACL surgery and correlates with degenerative MRI signal changes

PURPOSE

Anatomic tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction is crucial to restore knee function. The aims of this study were to (i) evaluate the accuracy of tunnel placement for primary state-of-the-art ACL reconstruction, and (ii) examine the correlation between incorrect tunnel placement, graft appearance, and notch impingement.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all patients underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with independent drilling of the femoral and tibial tunnels according to anatomical landmarks. The accuracy of tunnel placement and the rate of notch impingement were analysed with MRI. The study cohort was subdivided according to the morphology of the graft: intact, degeneration, and re-rupture. The objective outcome was evaluated with the IKDC objective score, and the subjective outcomes were evaluated with the IKDC subjective score, the Lysholm knee score, the KOOS, and the Tegner activity scale score.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven consecutive patients with a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 1.4 years were evaluated. There was no significant difference among the groups concerning the baseline characteristics. The re-rupture rate was 9.2%. The position of the femoral tunnel was correct in 92% of the patients, and the position of the tibial tunnel was correct in 93% of the patients. In the intact group, impingement was not found in any of the cases, whereas the rate of impingement in the degeneration (65%) and re-rupture (80%) groups was significantly higher than that in the intact group (p < 0.001). The risk of impingement was more likely with femoral (71% vs. 13%, p < 0.001) or tibial (100% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) malpositioning. The objective IKDC score was A in 52 patients (60%), B in 26 patients (30%), and C in 9 patients (10%). The average subjective IKDC score, Lysholm score, and KOOS were comparable in the intact and degeneration groups but significantly lower in the patient group with newly diagnosed re-ruptures (p = 0.05). The Tegner activity scale score was comparable in all three groups.

CONCLUSION

Even though the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement in modern single-bundle ACL reconstruction is greater, the risk of malpositioning and graft impingement remains. In our patient cohort, there was a clear correlation between ACL graft impingement, degenerative changes in MRI, and incorrect tunnel positioning. The surgeon must focus on accurate tunnel placement specific to individual patient anatomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Stenotic Intercondylar Notch as a Risk Factor for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study

Identifying risk factors is crucial for developing strategies that minimize reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study aims to determine whether certain features of intercondylar notch geometry are associated with failure of physeal-sparing ACLRs in skeletally immature athletes.

Increased Posterior Tibial Slope Is Associated With Greater Risk of Graft Roof Impingement After Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) has been reported to be associated with irreducible anterior tibial subluxation in extension after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), which raises concerns about the greater risk of graft roof impingement (GRI) although the tibial tunnel is positioned anatomically.

HYPOTHESIS

Increased PTS would be associated with greater risk of GRI after anatomic ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2017, a total of 418 consecutive patients were diagnosed as having noncontact ACL injuries and underwent primary anatomic ACLR. Among them, 26 patients had ≥1 of the following features during the second-look arthroscopy: fractured/guillotined bundles at the tibial insertion or cyclops lesion. These patients were confirmed to have GRI and were allocated to the study group. They were also matched 1:2 to 52 control participants without GRI. PTS was measured on true lateral whole-leg radiographs. Intra-articular ACL graft signal intensity was evaluated on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans (mean, 32.8 months; range, 26-38 months) and divided into 3 grades (I, good; II, moderate; III, poor) based on degree of GRI. Moreover, anterior subluxation of the lateral compartment (ASLC) and medial compartment (ASMC) in extension relative to the femoral condyles were measured on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans and compared between the groups. In addition, predictors of GRI were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis and included body mass index, PTS, pivot-shift test, KT-1000 side-to-side difference, and concomitant meniscal tears.

RESULTS

PTS in the study group was significantly higher than that in control group (mean ± SD, 13.8°± 1.5° vs 9.5°± 1.8°; P < .05). In the study group (n = 26), patients with grade III (poor) graft signal intensity (n = 9) showed significantly higher PTS than those with grade II (moderate; n = 17) (16.4°± 1.7° vs 12.4°± 1.3°; P < .05). Moreover, the mean postoperative ASLC and ASMC in extension were significantly larger in the study group than the control group (ASLC, 4.1 ± 1.3 vs 0.8 ± 0.4 mm; ASMC, 4.3 ± 1.5 vs 0.9 ± 0.3 mm; P < .05). Furthermore, the abnormal degree of PTS (≥12°) was determined to be an independent risk factor associated with GRI after anatomic ACLR (odds ratio, 9.0 [95% CI, 3.7-30.2]; P < .001), whereas body mass index, grade of pivot-shift test, KT-1000 side-to-side difference, and concomitant meniscal tears were not.

CONCLUSION

Increased PTS (≥12°) was associated with greater risk of GRI after anatomic ACLR. This may provide additional information for counseling patients with greater risk of GRI.

Radiographic assessment of the tibiofemoral relationship in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees

Background

The intercondylar roof line is one of the indicators used during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to see the relation to the position of the tibial tunnel. The tibial tunnel can be made posteriorly in the anteriorly subluxated tibia. During ACL reconstruction, the tibiofemoral relationship of the opposite or normal knee should be considered. The purpose of this study was to examine the radiographic tibiofemoral relationship of the sagittal plane in a standing position in ACL deficient knees.

Methods

In this study, 64 patients were evaluated for inclusion. Lateral radiographs of the injured and uninjured knee were obtained preoperatively in a standing position. The knee was fully extended with the opposite foot on a step, asking the patients to bear weight fully on one leg. The tibiofemoral relationship was evaluated in the radiographs.

Results

The mean value of anterior tibial subluxation was 1.2 mm in the injured side and -1.6 mm in the uninjured side. The tibia was located in a significantly anterior position in the injured knee (p < 0.0001). The mean distance of the space for the ACL was 9.7 mm in the injured side and 10.7 mm in the uninjured side (p < 0.01). Roof-plateau angle averaged 63.6° in the injured side and 67.4° in the uninjured side (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The tibiofemoral relationship of the ACL deficient knee was different from that of normal knee in the standing position. The relationship of the normal knee should be considered during ACL reconstruction and the risk of secondary lesions in the ACL deficient knee in activities of daily life should be considered.

Predictors of Healing Ligament Size and Magnetic Resonance Signal Intensity at 6 Months After Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

BACKGROUND

Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) augmented with a tissue engineered scaffold to facilitate ligament healing is a technique under development for patients with ACL injuries. The size (the amount of tissue) and signal intensity (the quality of tissue) of the healing ligament as visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been shown to be related to its strength in large animal models.

HYPOTHESIS

Both modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors could influence the size and signal intensity of the repaired ligament in patients at 6 months after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

62 patients (mean age, 19.4 years; range, 14-35 years) underwent MRI of the knee 6 months after ACL repair augmented with an extracellular matrix scaffold. The signal intensity (normalized to cortical bone) and average cross-sectional area of the healing ligament were measured from the MRI stack obtained by use of a gradient echo sequence. Associations between these 2 measures and patient characteristics, which included demographic, clinical, and anatomic features, were determined by use of multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

A larger cross-sectional area of the repaired ligament at 6 months was associated with male sex, older age, and the performance of a larger notchplasty ( P < .05 for all associations). A lower signal intensity at 6 months, indicating greater similarity to normal ligament, was associated with a smaller tibial slope and greater side-to-side difference in quadriceps strength 3 months after surgery. Other factors, including preoperative body mass index, mechanism of injury, tibial stump length, and Marx activity score, were not significantly associated with either MRI parameter at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Modifiable factors, including surgical notchplasty and slower recovery of quadriceps strength at 3 months, were associated with a larger cross-sectional area and improved signal intensity of the healing ACL after bridge-enhanced ACL repair in this preliminary study. Further studies to determine the optimal size of the notchplasty and the most effective postoperative rehabilitation strategy after ACL repair augmented by a scaffold are justified.

REGISTRATION

NCT02664545 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Y-reconstruction could be better for ACL reconstruction in knee hyperextension versus double-bundle double-tunnel technique: a retrospective comparative study of 56 patients

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of double-bundle (DB) single-tibial tunnel technique and double-tunnel technique for ACL reconstruction in patients with knee hyperextension.

METHODS

Defined as having constitutional hyperextension of greater than 10°, 56 patients with knee hyperextension who underwent ACL reconstruction were included in this study. To exclude concomitant lesions, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all knees. 24 patients (Group A) were treated with the anatomic DB/single-tibial tunnel ACL reconstruction and 32 patients (Group B) were treated with DB/double-tibial tunnel ACL reconstruction, all the included patients had knee hyperextension. Clinical results were evaluated by the extension angle, ROM, IKDC 2000 subjective score, rotational stability, pivot-shift test and anterior-posterior translation test before the operation and at the end of follow-up. MRI scan of the knee positioned in full extension was performed after 6 months post-operation. Location of tibial tunnels and graft signal intensity were assessed according to the MRI.

RESULTS

Postoperative extension deficit was detected in Group B, ROM of the injured knee in Group A was from extension angle 8.91 ± 3.16° to flexion angle 115.58 ± 10.53°. ROM of the injured knee in Group B was from extension angle - 2.13 ± 5.88° to flexion angle 119.25 ± 12.63°. Flexion angles of two groups did not show any significant difference (p = 0.24), while extension angles were quite different (p < 0.0001). Group A was slightly higher than Group B in IKDC subjective scores, but without significant difference (Group A 45.1 ± 6.5, Group B 42.4 ± 4.8, p = 0.09). There was no significant difference between two groups in pivot-shift test. Post-operational MRI showed more anterior located tibial tunnel and higher graft signal intensity in Group B when compared with Group A. One patient in the Group B had ligament retear, and required revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

DB/single-tibial tunnel technique restored the knee stability and overcame the shortcomings (such as knee extension deficit and graft impingement) of DB/double tibial tunnel, which might be more suitable for ACL reconstruction in knees with hyperextension.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II to III.

Contralateral knee hyperextension is associated with increased anterior tibial translation and fewer meniscal injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of hyperextension of the contralateral healthy knee on anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the presence of associated injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee.

METHODS

A local patient data register containing the surgical and clinical data of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction was analyzed. Patients were divided into groups according to the degree of hyperextension of the contralateral knee: normal (Group A ≤ 0°), mild (Group B 1°-5°), moderate (Group C 6°-10°), and severe (Group D > 10°). The ATT was measured in both knees preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively using the KT-1000 arthrometer. The presence of associated meniscal and cartilage injuries was noted. Using multivariate analysis, Groups B, C, and D were compared with Group A, using this group as a reference.

RESULTS

A total of 10,957 patients were available in the register and 8502 (Group A n = 4335, Group B n = 3331, Group C n = 771, Group D n = 65) were included in the final analysis. Groups B (10.3 mm; 95% CI 0.06-0.042, p < 0.0001) and C (10.6 mm; 95% CI 0.23-0.89, p = 0.006) showed significantly greater preoperative ATT in the injured knee compared with the control group (10.1 mm). Moreover, at the 6-month follow-up, greater ATT was observed for Groups B (8.5 mm; 95% CI 0.13-0.45, p < 0.0001), C (8.5 mm; 95% CI 0.02-0.60, p = 0.035), and D (9.1 mm; 95% CI - 0.08-1.77, p = 0.082) compared with Group A (8.2 mm). Meniscal injuries were less frequent in patients with contralateral hyperextension [Group B 903 (27.1%) p < 0.0001, Group C 208 (27.0%) p = 0.0003, and Group D 12 (18.5%), 0.012] compared with the control group [Group A 1479 (34.1%)].

CONCLUSION

Contralateral knee hyperextension is associated with greater pre- and postoperative ATT in the ACL-injured knee. In patients with contralateral knee hyperextension, concomitant injuries to the menisci are less frequent. Surgeons should consider grafts with superior properties regarding postoperative anteroposterior laxity to patients with contralateral knee hyperextension.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, Level IV.

Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position

PURPOSE

During anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, authors have suggested inserting the femoral tunnel at the biomechanically relevant direct fibres, but this higher position can cause more impingement. Therefore, we aimed to assess ACL graft impingement at the femoral notch for ACL reconstruction at both the direct and indirect tunnel positions.

METHODS

A virtual model was created for twelve cadaveric knees with computed tomography scanning in which a virtual graft was placed at direct and indirect tunnel positions of the anteromedial bundle (AM), posterolateral bundle (PL) or centre of the both bundles (C). In these six tunnel positions, the volume (mm³) and mid-point location of impingement (°) were measured at different flexion angles.

RESULTS

Generally, more impingement was seen with the indirect position compared with the direct position although this was only significant at 90° of flexion for the AM position (97 ± 28 vs. 76 ± 20 mm³, respectively; p = 0.046). The direct tunnel position impinged higher at the notch, whereas the indirect position impinged more towards the lateral wall, but this was only significant at 90° of flexion for the AM (24 ± 5° vs. 34 ± 4°, respectively; p < 0.001) and C position (34 ± 5° vs. 42 ± 5°, respectively; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

In this cadaveric study, the direct tunnel position did not cause more impingement than the indirect tunnel position. Based on these results, graft impingement is not a limitation to reconstruct the femoral tunnel at the insertion of the biomechanically more relevant direct fibres.

Increased revision rate with posterior tibial tunnel placement after using the 70-degree tibial guide in ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To map knee morphology radiographically in a population with a torn ACL and to investigate whether anatomic factors could be related to outcomes after ACL reconstruction at mid- to long-term follow-up. Further, we wanted to assess tibial tunnel placement after using the 70-degree "anti-impingement" tibial tunnel guide and investigate any relation between tunnel placement and revision surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction involving the 70-degree tibial guide from 2003 to 2008 were included. Two independent investigators analysed pre- and post-operative radiographs. Demographic data and information on revision surgery were collected from an internal database. Anatomic factors and post-operative tibial tunnel placements were investigated as predictors of revision.

RESULTS

Three-hundred and seventy-seven patients were included in the study. A large anatomic variation with significant differences between men and women was seen. None of the anatomic factors could be related to a significant increase in revision rate. Patients with a posterior tibial tunnel placement, defined as 50 % or more posterior on the Amis and Jakob line, did, however, have a higher risk of revision surgery compared to patients with an anterior tunnel placement (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Use of the 70-degree tibial guide did result in a high incidence (47 %) of posterior tibial tunnel placements associated with an increased rate of revision surgery. The current study was, however, not able to identify any anatomic variation that could be related to a higher risk of revision surgery. Avoiding graft impingement from the femoral roof in anterior tibial tunnel placements is important, but the insight that overly posterior tunnel placement can lead to inferior outcome should also be kept in mind when performing ACL surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Technical variables of ACL surgical reconstruction: effect on post-operative static laxity and clinical implication

PURPOSE

The hypothesis was that an alteration of different surgical variables of ACL reconstruction would produce significant changes in post-operative static laxity of knee joint.

METHODS

Joint laxity was acquired by a surgical navigation system for 17 patients just after graft fixation during single-bundle reconstruction with extra-articular lateral tenodesis. The analysed laxity parameters were: internal/external rotation at 30° (IE30) and 90° (IE90) of flexion, varus/valgus rotation at 0° (VV0) and 30° (VV30) of flexion and anterior/posterior displacement at 30° (AP30) and 90° (AP90) of flexion. As surgical variables, the angles between the tibial tunnel and the three planes were defined as well as the lengths of the tunnel and the relationship between native footprints and tunnels. The same analysis was performed for the femoral side. All surgical variables were combined in a multivariate analysis to assess for predictive factors between them and post-operative laxities values. To quantify the performance of each multivariate model, the correlation ratio (η ²) and the corresponding P value (*P < 0.050) have been evaluated.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis underlined statistically significant models for the estimation of: AP30 (η ² = 0.987; P = 0.014), IE30 (η ² = 0.995; P = 0.005), IE90 (η ² = 0.568; P = 0.010), VV0 (η ² = 0.932; P = 0.003). The parameters that greatly affected the identified models were the orientation of the tibial tunnel with respect to the three anatomical planes. The estimation of AP30, IE30 and IE90 got lower value as the orientation of the tibial tunnel with respect to transverse plane decreases. Considering the orientation to sagittal ([Formula: see text]) and coronal ([Formula: see text]) plane, we found that their reduction provoked a decrease in the estimation of AP30, IE30 and IE90 (except [Formula: see text] that did not appear in the estimation of AP30). The estimation of VV0 got an increase of [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] which led to a laxity reduction.

CONCLUSION

The main finding of the present in vivo study was the possibility to determine significant effects on post-operative static laxity level of different surgical variables of ACL reconstruction. In particular, the present study defined the conditions that minimize the different aspects of post-operative laxity at time-zero after surgery.

The influence of graft placement on clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

the aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of graft tunnel position on both clinical outcome and instrumental knee stability in patients submitted to arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft.

METHODS

thirty patients (24 men and 6 women) who underwent ACL reconstruction performed using an autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft were studied at a mean follow-up of 18 months. Clinical outcome was assessed on the basis of the Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form and the Short Form-36. Clinical outcomes were correlated with both femoral and tibial tunnel placement measured on standard anteroposterior and lateral knee radiographs, in accordance with established guidelines.

RESULTS

tibial tunnel position on the lateral view correlated significantly with both the IKDC subjective form (r = -0.72; p<0.05) and the Lysholm score (r=-0.73; p<0.05). Tibial tunnel position on the lateral view also correlated with stability measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer at 30N of force (r=0.57; p<0.05). No correlation was found between α angle and anteroposterior (AP) laxity measured by KT-1000 arthrometer. No significant correlation was found between femoral tunnel position (on either view) and Lysholm score, IKDC score and Tegner activity level. Similarly, no correlation was found between AP laxity measured by KT-1000 arthrometer and femoral tunnel position.

CONCLUSIONS

these results suggest that the more anterior the placement of the tibial tunnel, the better the clinical outcome will be. On the basis of literature data and our findings, we discuss the hypothesis that there exists a "correct area" for tunnel placement, making it possible to obtain the best results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Association of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Width With Anterior Knee Laxity

CONTEXT

Greater anterior knee laxity (AKL) has been identified as an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk factor. The structural factors that contribute to greater AKL are not fully understood but may include the ACL and bone geometry.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship of ACL width and femoral notch angle to AKL.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Controlled laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Twenty recreationally active females (age = 21.2 ± 3.1 years, height = 1.66.1 ± 7.3 cm, mass = 66.5 ± 12.0 kg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Anterior cruciate ligament width and femoral notch angle were obtained with magnetic resonance imaging of the knee and AKL was assessed. Anterior cruciate ligament width was measured as the width of a line that transected the ACL and was drawn perpendicular to the Blumensaat line. Femoral notch angle was formed by the intersection of the line parallel to the posterior cortex of the femur and the Blumensaat line. Anterior knee laxity was the anterior displacement of the tibia relative to the femur (mm) at 130 N of an applied force. Ten participants' magnetic resonance imaging data were assessed on 2 occasions to establish intratester reliability and precision. Using stepwise backward linear regression, we examined the extent to which ACL width, femoral notch angle, and weight were associated with AKL.

RESULTS

Strong measurement consistency and precision (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,1] ± SEM) were established for ACL width (0.98 ± 0.3 mm) and femoral notch angle (0.97° ± 1.1°). The regression demonstrated that ACL width (5.9 ± 1.4 mm) was negatively associated with AKL (7.2 ± 2.0 mm; R(2) = 0.22, P = .04). Femoral notch angle and weight were not retained in the final model.

CONCLUSIONS

A narrower ACL was associated with greater AKL. This finding may inform the development of ACL injury-prevention programs that include components designed to increase ACL size or strength (or both). Future authors should establish which other factors contribute to greater AKL in order to best inform injury-prevention efforts.

Predictive mathematical modeling of knee static laxity after ACL reconstruction: in vivo analysis

Previous studies did not take into consideration such large variety of surgery variables which describe the performed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the interaction among them in the definition of postoperative outcome. Seventeen patients who underwent navigated Single Bundle plus Lateral Plasty ACL reconstruction were enrolled in the study. Static laxity was evaluated as the value of anterior/posterior displacement at 30° and at 90° of flexion, internal/external rotation at 30° and 90° of knee flexion, varus/valgus test at 0° and 30° of flexion. The evaluated surgical variables were analyzed through a multivariate analysis defining the following models: AP30estimate, AP90estimate, IE30estimate, IE90estimate, VV0estimate, VV30estimate. Surgical variables has been defined as the angles between the tibial tunnel and the three planes, the lengths of the tunnel and the relationship between native footprints and tunnels. An analogous characterization was performed for the femoral side. Performance and significance of the defined models have been quantified by the correlation ratio (η(2)) and the corresponding p-value (*p < 0.050). The analyzed models resulted to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) for prediction of postoperative static laxity values. The only exception was the AP90estimate model. The η(2) ranged from 0.568 (IE90estimate) to 0.995 (IE30estimate). The orientation of the tibial tunnel resulted to be the most important surgical variable for the performed laxity estimation. Mathematical models for postoperative knee laxity is a useful tool to evaluate the effects of different surgical variables on the postoperative outcome.

An Evaluation of the Association Between Radiographic Intercondylar Notch Narrowing and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Men: The Notch Angle Is a Better Parameter Than Notch Width

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries with the intercondylar notch angle and notch width in male patients. The secondary purpose was to evaluate the association of these injuries with other novel morphologic parameters.

METHODS

Male patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction between 2010 and 2013 for injury through noncontact mechanisms with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging were compared with an age-matched control group of male patients (patients who underwent knee operations other than ACL reconstruction) regarding the following magnetic resonance imaging-assessed parameters: intercondylar notch angle, width, and depth; condylar width; medial/lateral condylar widths; medial/lateral posterior tibial plateau slopes; anterior sagittal tibial slope (corresponding to the level of the tibial ACL footprint); coronal tibial slope; and angle between the Blumensaat line and anterior tibial slope.

RESULTS

In both the coronal and axial planes, patients with ACL injury had a significantly lower intercondylar notch angle (P < .001 and P = .008, respectively) than the control group, but there were no significant between-group differences for intercondylar notch width (P = .9 and P = .97, respectively). In the sagittal plane, patients with ACL injury had significantly higher medial (P < .001) and lateral (P = .02) posterior tibial slopes, a significantly lower anterior tibial slope (P = .01), and a significantly higher angle between the Blumensaat line and anterior tibial slope (P = .02) than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Narrowing of the intercondylar notch may be associated with ACL injury in male patients. However, the intercondylar notch angle may be a better parameter to evaluate notch narrowing and its potential association with ACL injuries compared with the notch width. The association between the angle formed by the Blumensaat line and anterior tibial slope and ACL injuries in male patients needs more investigation. This study further suggests that increased posterior tibial slope may be associated with ACL injury in male patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

The role of computer assisted navigation in revision surgery for failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee: A continuous series of 52 cases

INTRODUCTION

The causes of failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction mainly involve incorrect tunnel positioning. There is no intraoperative tool allowing the surgeon to test graft biomechanics and to confirm that the new graft is in an optimal position.

HYPOTHESIS

Control is improved with computer assisted navigation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, revision ACL reconstruction was performed with a new autologous graft in a continuous series of 52 failed ACL reconstructions. A computer assisted navigation system was used intraoperatively in all knees. Evaluation with this system confirmed the position of old and new tunnels as well as intraoperative laxity.

RESULTS

Evaluation of tunnel position based on traditional radiological criteria found in the literature significantly underestimated graft biomechanics: 69% of the cases presented with unfavorable graft ansiometry (mean: 13 ± 2.2mm) while the correct position of the tibial tunnel was identified in 64% of cases on radiography and the femoral tunnel in 48%. All new grafts were optimally positioned by the computer assisted navigation system with a mean isometery of 3.2 (± 0.7) mm. Comparative pre- and postoperative evaluation of laxity showed a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.001): preoperative and postoperative Lachman test: 10.5 ± 2 mm and 3 ± 0.5, respectively; global rotational laxity: 24 ± 5° and 37 ± 7° respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of a computer assisted navigation system allows optimal positioning of the graft as well as a predictive assessment of laxity.

Clinical Outcomes After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Extreme Knee Hyperextension and Normal to Mild Knee Hyperextension

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in extreme knee hyperextension versus normal to mild knee hyperextension.

METHODS

For 100 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACLR using semitendinosus tendon, we evaluated the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior tibial translation (measured on stress radiographs) and rotational stability (assessed by the pivot-shift test) 2 years after surgery. Loss of extension (LOE) was evaluated on lateral radiographs of both knees in full extension, and graft integrity was assessed during second-look arthroscopy 1 to 2 years after surgery. In accordance with the Beighton and Honan criteria, patients with an extension angle less than or equal to 10° in the contralateral uninjured knee composed the group with 10° or less hyperextension (N group), and those with an extension angle of greater than 10° composed the group with more than 10° hyperextension (H group). Postoperative results were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

Mean extension angles in the N and H groups were 5.8° ± 2.9° and 14.7° ± 3.0°, respectively. The mean SSD in anterior translation was 2.2 ± 2.9 mm for the N group and 2.8 ± 2.9 mm for the H group, with no significant difference. The positive ratios on the pivot-shift test were not significantly different between the groups. Mean LOE in the N and H groups was -0.7° ± 3.7° and 1.3° ± 3.3°, respectively, with a significant difference (P = .007). During second-look arthroscopy, 6 of 58 knees in the N group and 13 of 42 knees in the H group had superficial graft laceration of the anteromedial bundle graft, with a significant difference (P = .01) seen between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic double-bundle ACLR for extreme knee hyperextension may attain the same postoperative anterior and rotational stability as seen in knees with normal to mild hyperextension. However, it increased superficial graft laceration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Notchplasty in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the setting of passive anterior tibial subluxation

PURPOSE

In an effort to minimize graft impingement among various ACL deficient states, we sought to quantitatively determine requirements for bone resection during notchplasty with respect to both volumetric amount and location.

METHODS

A validated method was used to evaluate Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans. We measured the ATT of the medial and lateral compartments in the following four states: intact ACL (27 patients), acute ACL disruption; <2 months post-injury (76 patients), chronic ACL disruption; 12 months post-injury (42 patients) and failed ACL reconstruction (75 patients). Subsequently, 11 cadaveric knees underwent Computed Tomography (CT) scanning. Specialized software allowed virtual anterior translation of the tibia according to the average ATT measured on MRI. Impingement volume was analyzed by performing virtual ACLRs onto the various associated CT scans. Location was analyzed by overlaying an on-screen protractor. The center of the notch was defined as 0°.

RESULTS

Average impingement volume changed significantly in the various groups compared to the intact ACL group (acute 577 ± 200 mm(3), chronic 615 ± 199 mm(3), failed ACLR 678 ± 210 mm(3), p=0.0001). The location of the required notchplasty of the distal femoral wall border did not change significantly. The proximal femoral border moved significantly towards the center of the notch (acute 8.6° ± 4.8°, chronic 7.8° ± 4.2° (p=0.013), failed ACLR 5.1° ± 5.9° (p=0.002)).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that attention should be paid peri-operatively to the required volume and location of notchplasty among the various ACL deficient states to minimize graft impingement.

Effect of Notchplasty in Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The effects of notchplasty on the clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remain unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Anatomic ACL reconstruction with notchplasty would result in less risk of loss of extension and would provide adequate space for better graft healing, leading to better knee stability compared with anatomic ACL reconstruction without notchplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 137 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included. Seventy-three patients without notchplasty were classified as the control group, and 64 patients with 2-mm notchplasty were classified as the notchplasty group. The following evaluation methods were used: loss of extension, patient's subjective feeling of limited extension and pain at passive full extension, muscle strength, manual laxity tests, KT-1000 arthrometer measurement, patellofemoral joint findings, Tegner score, Lysholm score, subjective scores, and time to return to sports. Tearing of the reconstructed ACL and additional synovectomy were recorded. Both tibial and femoral tunnel positions were measured using 2-view radiographs: a Rosenberg and a lateral view.

RESULTS

Loss of extension was larger in the notchplasty group compared with controls (at 6 months: 0.8° vs 1.4°, P = .012; at 2 years: 0.4° vs 0.9°, P = .0053). The number of patients with a feeling of limited extension was also larger in the notchplasty group (at 6 months: 13 patients graded 1+ [somewhat limited] and 2 patients graded 2+ [very limited] vs 18 graded 1+ and 6 graded 2+, P = .015; at 2 years: 2 graded 1+ and 0 graded 2+ vs 4 graded 1+ and 5 graded 2+, P = .011). Six patients in the notchplasty group required additional synovectomy because of the prolonged loss of extension, whereas no patient in the control group required additional synovectomy. There were no differences between groups regarding muscle strength, patellofemoral findings, Lysholm score, Tegner score, subjective scores, or time to return to sports. The KT-1000 arthrometer measurement was better in the notchplasty group (1.2 vs 0.4 mm, P = .0017). However, 6 patients in the notchplasty group showed an overconstrained knee (KT-1000 measurement ≤-2 mm), compared with only 1 patient in the control group. There were no differences between groups in the other manual laxity tests or the tunnel positions.

CONCLUSION

In anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction, anterior stability was improved and there were no harmful effects on patellofemoral joint findings by 2-mm notchplasty; however, notchplasty likely caused overconstrained knee, leading to a need for additional synovectomy in some patients. In contrast, anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction without notchplasty did not increase the incidence of loss of extension or of graft failure.

Effect of a too posterior placement of the tibial tunnel on the outcome 10-12 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the 70-degree tibial guide

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between the radiographically assessed placement of the tibial tunnel and the long-term clinical and subjective outcome in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patients.

METHODS

Patients were examined clinically, with subjective score systems and with standardised radiographs 10-12 years postoperatively. Only patients reconstructed with the aid of the 70-degree tibial drill guide were included. A posterior placement of the tibial tunnel was defined as >50% along the Amis and Jakob line (AJL). A high tunnel inclination was defined as >75° in the coronal plane. The possible linear relationships between clinical findings, subjective scores and tibial tunnel placement were investigated.

RESULTS

Eighty-six percentage of the 96 patients were available for examination. Mean tibial tunnel inclination was 71.1° (SD 4.2). No difference was found in subjective scores and knee stability between high (14%) and low (86%) inclination groups. Mean placement of the tibial tunnel along the AJL was 46% (SD 5). Patients with a posterior tibial tunnel placement (24%) had a higher incidence of rotational instability (P = 0.02). Patients with rotational instability (grade 2 pivot shift) had significant lower Lysholm score than those with grade 0 and 1 rotational instability (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a tibial drill guide that relates to the femoral roof leads to a posterior tibial tunnel placement (>50% of the tibial AP-diameter) in 24% of the patients. These patients have a significant higher proportion of rotational instability and worse subjective outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Comparison of Achilles and tibialis anterior tendon allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using Achilles tendon allografts and tibialis anterior (TA) tendon allografts with respect to objective knee testing measures, second-look arthroscopy and femoral tunnel enlargement.

METHODS

A total of 131 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2000 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Achilles tendon allografts were used in 81 patients (group I). These patients were compared with 50 patients in whom TA tendon allografts were used (group II). The two groups were assessed using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm and Tegner activity scores, as well as KT-2000 testing. Second-look arthroscopic findings were evaluated. Cross-sectional area (CSA) perpendicular to the long axis of the femoral tunnel was also calculated digitally using magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to IKDC, Lysholm or Tegner activity scores or the results of laxity testing with arthrometry. Synovial coverage of more than 50 % was found in 71.1 % cases in group I and 75 % cases in group II. Mean CSA enlargement of 15 % (group I) and 38 % (group II) was detected (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical results associated with Achilles and TA tendons were not significantly different. The laxity evaluation and second-look arthroscopy demonstrated no significant differences between group I and group II. However, Achilles tendon-bone plugs for femoral tunnel fixation reduced femoral tunnel enlargement compared to the TA allograft. Achilles tendon allografts for ACL reconstruction could be a reasonable option in selected patients.

Three-dimensional characterization of the femoral footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to define an anatomic standard for the femoral footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) based on 3-dimensional (3D) surface reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) scans of cadaveric knees.

METHODS

The femoral insertion of the PCL was identified and marked with drill holes in 7 cadaveric knees. CT scans were performed on each specimen, and 3D computer models were generated. The distance from the condyle edges to the margins of the footprint were referenced to the total condylar size parallel and perpendicular to the femoral axis and intercondylar notch.

RESULTS

The mean ratio of the anteroposterior width of the medial femoral condyle referenced parallel to the intercondylar notch measured 0.08 ± 0.02 for the anterior border, 0.60 ± 0.08 for the posterior border, 0.16 ± 0.05 for the proximal border, and 0.44 ± 0.06 for the distal border. The mean ratio of the superior-inferior height of the medial femoral condyle with respect to the apex of the intercondylar notch corrected and referenced perpendicular to the intercondylar notch measured 0.14 ± 0.04 for the anterior border, 0.44 ± 0.07 for the posterior border, 0.03 ± 0.02 for the proximal border, and 0.56 ± 0.07 for the distal border.

CONCLUSIONS

This cadaveric study provides an anatomic reference for mathematical analysis of the femoral PCL footprint using CT-based 3D topographic modeling. The average PCL center point is located 25% down from the roof of the notch and 38% from anterior to posterior from the anterior condyle with regard to total medial femoral condyle length.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides a standard of measurement for future studies that use advanced imaging to evaluate the accuracy of PCL reconstruction.

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction restricts knee extension in knees with hyperextension

PURPOSE

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction has been demonstrated to be at least as effective as single-bundle reconstruction in terms of restoring knee rotational and translational stability. Until now, the influence on knees with hyperextension has not been evaluated. It was the purpose of this study to evaluate whether double-bundle ACL reconstruction restricts extension in hyperextendable knees.

METHODS

Hamstring tendon reconstructions of 10 human cadaveric knees with the ability of hyperextension (age: 48 ± 14 years) were performed as single bundle (SB) on one side and double bundle (DB) on the other side. A surgical navigation system (BrainLab, Germany) was used to assess the kinematics of each knee at the intact and reconstructed state. A difference with regard to the anterior-to-posterior translation (AP) and rotational stability at 30° of knee flexion, 90° of flexion and the hyperextension capability of each specimen was analysed.

RESULTS

The difference in AP translation before and after the reconstruction was not significantly different in 30° and 90° of flexion (n.s). Both single- and double-bundle reconstructions restored the preoperative kinematics at 30° and 90° of knee flexion (n.s). The knee extension was 4° ± 1.8° with the intact ACL and 4° ± 1.7° after reconstruction in the SB group (n.s). The knee extension was 5° of hyperextension ± 1.1° with the intact ACL and 0° ± 0.4° after reconstruction in the DB group; the limitation of the extension was significantly larger in this group (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Both single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques are capable of restoring knee anteroposterior and rotational stability. Double-bundle reconstructions significantly reduce knee extension in knees with hyperextension capability. Care must be taken when using double-bundle techniques in patients with knee hyperextension as this procedure may limit the knee extension after double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Radiographic findings in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from the Mars cohort

The Multicenter ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) Revision Study (MARS) group was developed to investigate revision ACL reconstruction outcomes. An important part of this is obtaining and reviewing radiographic studies. The goal for this radiographic analysis is to establish radiographic findings for a large revision ACL cohort to allow comparison with future studies. The study was designed as a cohort study. Various established radiographic parameters were measured by three readers. These included sagittal and coronal femoral and tibial tunnel position, joint space narrowing, and leg alignment. Inter- and intraobserver comparisons were performed. Femoral sagittal position demonstrated 42% were more than 40% anterior to the posterior cortex. On the sagittal tibia tunnel position, 49% demonstrated some impingement on full-extension lateral radiographs. Limb alignment averaged 43% medial to the medial edge of the tibial plateau. On the Rosenberg view (45-degree flexion view), the minimum joint space in the medial compartment averaged 106% of the opposite knee, but it ranged down to a minimum of 4.6%. Lateral compartment narrowing at its minimum on the Rosenberg view averaged 91.2% of the opposite knee, but it ranged down to a minimum of 0.0%. On the coronal view, verticality as measured by the angle from the center of the tibial tunnel aperture to the center of the femoral tunnel aperture measured 15.8 degree ± 6.9% from vertical. This study represents the radiographic findings in the largest revision ACL reconstruction series ever assembled. Findings were generally consistent with those previously demonstrated in the literature.

Variability in ACL tunnel placement: observational clinical study of surgeon ACL tunnel variability

BACKGROUND

Multicenter and multisurgeon cohort studies on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are becoming more common. Minimal information exists on intersurgeon and intrasurgeon variability in ACL tunnel placement. Purpose/

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to analyze intersurgeon and intrasurgeon variability in ACL tunnel placement in a series of The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACL reconstruction patients and in a clinical cohort of ACL reconstruction patients. The hypothesis was that there would be minimal variability between surgeons in ACL tunnel placement.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients who underwent ACL reconstruction by 8 surgeons had postoperative imaging with computed tomography, and ACL tunnel location and angulation were analyzed using 3-dimensional surface processing and measurement. Intersurgeon and intrasurgeon variability in ACL tunnel placement was analyzed.

RESULTS

For intersurgeon variability, the range in mean ACL femoral tunnel depth between surgeons was 22%. For femoral tunnel height, there was a 19% range. Tibial tunnel location from anterior to posterior on the plateau had a 16% range in mean results. There was only a small range of 4% for mean tibial tunnel location from the medial to lateral dimension. For intrasurgeon variability, femoral tunnel depth demonstrated the largest ranges, and tibial tunnel location from medial to lateral on the plateau demonstrated the least variability. Overall, surgeons were relatively consistent within their own cases. Using applied measurement criteria, 85% of femoral tunnels and 90% of tibial tunnels fell within applied literature-based guidelines. Ninety-one percent of the axes of the femoral tunnels fell within the boundaries of the femoral footprint.

CONCLUSION

The data demonstrate that surgeons performing ACL reconstructions are relatively consistent between each other. There is, however, variability of average tunnel placement up to 22% of mean condylar depth, likely reflecting the difference in individual surgeons' preferred tunnel locations. Individual surgeons are relatively consistent in their cases of ACL tunnels.

The importance of tibial tunnel placement in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to measure the anterior edge of the tibial tunnel after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on lateral radiographs and to determine whether the difference in tibial tunnel placement affects postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

For 60 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon, we evaluated the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation on stress radiographs, as well as rotational stability by the pivot-shift test, 2 years after surgery. Loss of extension (LOE) was evaluated on lateral radiographs of both knees in full extension, and graft integrity was assessed during second-look arthroscopy 1 to 2 years after surgery. On true lateral radiographs, we measured the anterior placement percentage of the tibial tunnel using the method described by Amis and Jakob. The cutoff value was set at 25% of the mean value of the anterior edge of the ACL that Amis and Jakob reported, and patients were divided into 2 groups (27 in the anterior group and 33 in the posterior group). Postoperative clinical results were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The mean anterior placement percentage was 26.0% ± 4.1%. The postoperative mean side-to-side difference was 1.4 ± 2.7 mm for the anterior group and 3.0 ± 2.7 mm for the posterior group, a significant difference (P < .05). The positive ratio of the pivot-shift test was not significantly different between groups (P > .05). Mean LOE in the anterior and posterior groups was 0.9° ± 3.0° and -0.8° ± 4.0°, respectively; the difference was not significant (P > .05). Five of 27 knees in the anterior group and 5 of 33 knees in the posterior group had superficial graft laceration or elongation, which was not significantly different (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior placement of the tibial tunnel in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction leads to better anterior knee stability than posterior placement does. Anterior tibial tunnel placement inside the footprint did not increase the incidence of LOE and graft failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft impingement is one of the most troubling complications in ACL reconstruction. In the previous strategy of isometric "non-anatomical" ACL reconstruction, posterior tibial tunnel placement and notchplasty were recommended to avoid graft impingement. Recently, the strategy of ACL reconstruction is shifting towards "anatomical" reconstruction. In anatomical ACL reconstruction, the potential risk of graft impingement is higher than in non-anatomical reconstruction because the tibial tunnel is placed at a more anterior portion on the tibia. However, there have been few studies reporting on graft impingement in anatomical ACL reconstruction. This study will provide a review of graft impingement status in both non-anatomical and the more recent anatomical ACL reconstruction techniques. In conclusion, with the accurate creation of bone tunnels within ACL native footprint, the graft impingement might not happen in anatomical ACL reconstruction. For the clinical relevance, to prevent graft impingement, surgeons should pay attention of creating correct anatomical tunnels when they perform ACL reconstruction. Level of evidence IV.

Relationship of the intercondylar roof and the tibial footprint of the ACL: implications for ACL reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Debate exists on the proper relation of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint with the intercondylar notch in anatomic ACL reconstructions. Patient-specific graft placement based on the inclination of the intercondylar roof has been proposed. The relationship between the intercondylar roof and native ACL footprint on the tibia has not previously been quantified.

HYPOTHESIS

No statistical relationship exists between the intercondylar roof angle and the location of the native footprint of the ACL on the tibia.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Knees from 138 patients with both lateral radiographs and MRI, without a history of ligamentous injury or fracture, were reviewed to measure the intercondylar roof angle of the femur. Roof angles were measured on lateral radiographs. The MRI data of the same knees were analyzed to measure the position of the central tibial footprint of the ACL (cACL). The roof angle and tibial footprint were evaluated to determine if statistical relationships existed.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean ± SD age of 40 ± 16 years. Average roof angle was 34.7° ± 5.2° (range, 23°-48°; 95% CI, 33.9°-35.5°), and it differed by sex but not by side (right/left). The cACL was 44.1% ± 3.4% (range, 36.1%-51.9%; 95% CI, 43.2%-45.0%) of the anteroposterior length of the tibia. There was only a weak correlation between the intercondylar roof angle and the cACL (R = 0.106). No significant differences arose between subpopulations of sex or side.

CONCLUSION

The tibial footprint of the ACL is located in a position on the tibia that is consistent and does not vary according to intercondylar roof angle. The cACL is consistently located between 43.2% and 45.0% of the anteroposterior length of the tibia. Intercondylar roof-based guidance may not predictably place a tibial tunnel in the native ACL footprint. Use of a generic ACL footprint to place a tibial tunnel during ACL reconstruction may be reliable in up to 95% of patients.

How isometric are the anatomic femoral tunnel and the anterior tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the isometry of an anatomic femoral tunnel and anterior tibial tunnel positions.

METHODS

Tibial tunnels were made at 2 different locations in 10 cadaveric knees: the conventional tunnel and a more anterior position. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scanning was then performed at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. After removal of the anterior cruciate ligament from its femoral attachment, the 2 different femoral tunnels were marked at (1) the vertical femoral tunnel point and (2) the anatomic femoral tunnel point. After scans were repeated for coordinate transformation, the change in length between the tunnels was calculated with imaging software (OsiriX, version 3.2; Apple, Cupertino, CA) and the center of rotation for the femoral tunnels was calculated with a least squares fitting algorithm.

RESULTS

The conventional tibial tunnel-vertical femoral tunnel combination showed the least excursion as knee flexion angle changed. The vertical femoral tunnel combination groups showed a trend toward increasing length as the knee flexion angle increased. In contrast, the anatomic femoral tunnel combination groups displayed a trend toward decreased length with increasing knee flexion. At less than 30° of flexion, the tibial anterior-anatomic femoral tunnel showed the least excursion.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomic femoral tunnel was nonisometric, and the differences in isometry for each tunnel type were explained primarily by differences in relations between the centers of rotation of tunnels and tunnel position. When a femoral anatomic tunnel is chosen for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the anterior tibial tunnel offers greater isometric benefits than the conventional tibial tunnel, especially in near full extension.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The distance between anatomic femoral and tibial tunnels is greatest in full extension and decreases with flexion. This would result in graft laxity. The surgeon should give consideration to a more anterior tibial tunnel position, which shows less excursion in early flexion.

Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a potentially devastating event that affects a predominantly young and active population. This review article provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential causes of failure, including graft failure, loss of motion, extensor mechanism dysfunction, osteoarthritis, and infection. The etiology of graft failure is discussed in detail with a particular emphasis on failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Analysis of anatomic positioning in computer-assisted and conventional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction should be anatomic while achieving favorable anisometric behavior to avoid impingement with the femoral notch. Computerization enables these biomechanical conditions to be optimally fulfilled; but what of anatomic positioning? The present study compared the positioning of tibial and femoral tunnels, drilled using either a conventional ACL guide or a navigation system, using the anatomic foot-print areas of the native ACL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cadaver study used computerized recording to compare tibial and femoral ACL attachment areas to the positioning of tunnels created either conventionally or under computer-guided navigation.

RESULTS

Computer guidance enabled the tibial and femoral tunnels to be systematically positioned within the anatomic area and, as regards the tibial area, within the anterior third near to the medial tibial spine, without femoral notch impingement. Anisometry was in all cases favorable, at a mean 3.3 ± 0.7 mm; using a conventional guide, anisometry was favorable in only 50% of cases, at a mean 5.4 ± 1.2 mm.

CONCLUSION

Computer-guided navigation ensured implant positioning within the so-called anatomometric area of the native ACL attachment, avoiding impingement with the femoral notch.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

[Biodegradable screw versus a press-fit bone plug fixation for ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study]

BACKGROUND

Press-fit fixation of a tendon graft has been advocated in order to achieve tendon to bone healing.

HYPOTHESIS

Fixation of a tendon graft with a porous bone scaffold limits bone tunnel enlargement compared with a biodegradable interference screw fixation.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2006, 20 patients (17 men, 3 women) were enrolled in this study for primary reconstruction of the ACL. Patients were randomized to either obtain graft fixation in the tibial tunnel by means of an interference screw (I) or a press-fit fixation with a porous bone cylinder (P). Three months after surgery, a CT scan of the knee was performed and tunnel enlargement was analysed in the coronal and sagittal planes for the proximal, middle and distal thirds of the tunnel. After 6 months, 1 and 2 years, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner and Lysholm scores of both groups were compared.

RESULTS

The bone tunnel enlargement was 106.9±10.9% for group P and 121.9±9.0% for group I (P<0.02) in the AP plane and 102.8±15.2% vs 121.5±10.1% in the coronal plane (P<0.01). IKDC, Tegner, and Lysholm scores improved in both groups from pre- to postoperative assessment without significant differences between the two groups. There was a trend to higher knee stability in group P after 3 months (0.6±1.4 mm vs 1.81±.5 mm, P=0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Both interference screw and a press-fit fixation lead to a high number of good or very good outcomes after ACL reconstruction. Tibial press-fit fixation decreases the amount of proximal bone tunnel enlargement. Press-fit fixation decreases the amount of proximal bone tunnel enlargement and improves bone to tendon contact.

Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision

The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to analyze the causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and the influence of meniscectomies after revision. This study was conducted over a 12-year period, from 1994 to 2005 with ten French orthopaedic centers participating. Assessment included the objective International Knee Documenting Committee (IKDC) 2000 scoring system evaluation. Two hundred and ninety-three patients were available for statistics. Untreated laxity, femoral and tibial tunnel malposition, impingement, failure of fixation were assessed, new traumatism and infection were recorded. Meniscus surgery was evaluated before, during or after primary ACL reconstruction, and then during or after revision ACL surgery. The main cause for failure of ACL reconstruction was femoral tunnel malposition in 36% of the cases. Forty-four percent of the patients with an anterior femoral tunnel as a cause for failure of the primary surgery were IKDC A after revision versus 24% if the cause of failure was not the femoral tunnel (P = 0.05). A 70% meniscectomy rate was found in revision ACL reconstruction. Comparison between patients with a total meniscectomy (n = 56) and patients with preserved menisci (n = 65) revealed a better functional result and knee stability in the non-meniscectomized group (P = 0.04). This study shows that the anterior femoral tunnel malposition is the main cause for failure in ACL reconstruction. This reason for failure should be considered as a predictive factor of good result of revision ACL reconstruction. Total meniscectomy jeopardizes functional result and knee stability at follow-up.

Development and in situ application of an adjustable aiming device to guide extra- to intraarticular tibial tunnel drilling for the insertion of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To develop and test an arthroscopic aiming device for extra- to intraarticular tibial tunnel drilling emerging at the center of the tibial insertion (CenterTib) of the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) in medium to large breed dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive experimental study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Fifty-two cadaveric hind limbs of dogs >or=20 kg BW.

METHODS

The mediolateral position and craniocaudal position (ccPos) of CenterTib in relation to the caudomedial meniscotibial ligament were measured on photographs of 46 dissected tibial plateaus. The proximal tibial depth (TibDepth) was determined on lateral radiographs and its correlation with ccPos was assessed using linear regression analysis. Extra- to intraarticular arthroscopic tibial tunnel drilling was performed in 6 independent cadaveric stifles. A C-guide with an adjustable craniocaudal offset was constructed and adjusted according to ccPos estimated based on TibDepth. The position of the resulting bone tunnels was compared with the position of the CenterTib.

RESULTS

Pearson's correlation between TibDepth and ccPos was strong (R=0.86; P<.001). ccPos (y) as a function of TibDepth (x) can be expressed as y=-4.8+0.3x. Arthroscopic tunnel drilling resulted in a median deviation of the drill tunnels around the CenterTib of 1 mm.

CONCLUSION

The regression equation and aiming device permit localization and targeting of CenterTib during extra- to intraarticular tibial bone tunnel drilling in vitro.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The proposed technique may reduce tibial tunnel misplacement when performing intraarticular CCL repair using a tibial bone tunnel.

Effect of tibial drill angles on bone tunnel aperture during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament has received greater attention as patient outcome assessment has become increasingly sophisticated. A goal during anatomic reconstruction should be the creation of a tibial tunnel aperture that is similar in size and orientation to the native anterior cruciate ligament insertion. Aperture morphology depends primarily on three factors: (1) drill-bit diameter, (2) the angle at which the tunnel intersects the tibial plateau (drill-guide angle), and (3) the tibial tunnel orientation in the transverse plane (transverse drill angle). We evaluated the influence of the aforementioned factors on tibial bone-tunnel aperture size and orientation.

METHODS

With use of various drill-bit diameters at different drill-guide angles, tunnel aperture areas were calculated on the basis of an elliptical shape. The change in tunnel aperture orientation within the transverse plane (along the tibial plateau surface) was quantified by calculating the change in anteroposterior and mediolateral lengths of the aperture.

RESULTS

Use of a 9-mm drill-bit at a 45 degrees drill-guide angle created a 90-mm(2) bone-tunnel aperture area. Decreasing the drill-guide angle from 65 degrees to 30 degrees resulted in an increase in area of 81%. An aperture oriented 45 degrees relative to the orientation of the native insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament in the transverse plane fell short of the anatomic anteroposterior distance by 2.3 mm and exceeded the mediolateral distance by 1.4 mm on the basis of a 9-mm drill-bit at a drill-guide angle of 45 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

During anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the drill-bit diameter, sagittal drill angle, and transverse drill angle can all affect tibial tunnel aperture size and orientation. An improperly sized and oriented tunnel aperture may increase the risk of damaging surrounding structures. An optimal combination of these parameters should be chosen during anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Biodegradable screw versus a press-fit bone plug fixation for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Press-fit fixation of a tendon graft has been advocated to achieve tendon-to-bone healing.

HYPOTHESIS

Fixation of hamstring tendon grafts with a porous bone scaffold limits bone tunnel enlargement compared with a biodegradable interference screw fixation.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods Between 2005 and 2006, 20 patients (17 men, 3 women) with a primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized to obtain graft fixation in the tibial tunnel either by means of an interference screw (I) or a press-fit fixation with a porous bone cylinder (P). At 3 months after surgery, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the knee was performed, and tunnel enlargement was analyzed in the coronal and sagittal planes for the proximal, middle, and distal thirds of the tunnel. After 6 months and 1 and 2 years, radiographs of the knee in the sagittal and coronal plane were analyzed for bone tunnel widening. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner, and Lysholm scores of both groups were compared after 1 and 2 years.

RESULTS

The bone tunnel enlargement determined by CT was 106.9% + or - 10.9% for group P and 121.9% + or - 9.0% for group I (P < .02) in the anteroposterior (AP) plane and 102.8% + or - 15.2% versus 121.5% + or - 10.1% in the coronal plane (P <.01). The IKDC, Tegner, and Lysholm scores improved in both groups from preoperatively to postoperatively without significant differences between the 2 groups. There was a trend to higher knee stability in group P after 3 months (0.6 + or - 1.4 mm vs 1.8 + or - 1.5 mm; P = .08).

CONCLUSION

Both interference screw and a press-fit fixation lead to a high number of good or very good outcomes after ACL reconstruction. Tibial press-fit fixation decreases the amount of proximal bone tunnel enlargement.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of the hamstring autograft femoral fixation using the EndoButton CL

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a prospective, continuous series of 105 ACL reconstructions using the STG tendons fixed to the femur by an EndoButton CL, with more than 4 years of follow-up.

HYPOTHESIS

The subjective and objective clinical results as well as the radiological results (tunnel enlargement) obtained by a cortical, extra-anatomic femoral fixation are at least equivalent to the results obtained with other types of femoral fixation systems.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and five patients aged with a mean 26 years (range, 12-56 years) were operated on for an anterior cruciate ligament rupture using the same technique and by the same operator: four-strand STG fixed to the tibia by a double fixation--BioRCI-HA screw and staple--and on the femur by an EndoButton CL (Smith and Nephew). The results were assessed at 6 months, 1 and 2 years and then at a mean follow-up of 51 months, both clinically (IKDC, Lysholm, KT-1000) and radiologically (Telos laximetry, tunnel position, and morphological analysis).

RESULTS

No complications related to the use of the EndoButton were observed. No additional interference screw was necessary. According to the IKDC laxity classification, 91.4% of the patients were classified in category A or B, nine knees (8.6%) were classified C or D. Four failures required revision with a patellar tendon graft. On the final IKDC score, 63 patients (60%) were classified grade A, 37 grade B (35.3%), four grade C (3.8%), and one grade D (0.9%). On the Telos laximetry, 62 patients (59%) had a differential laxity less than or equal to 2 mm. The mean value was 1.8 mm (range, 0-11). Tibial tunnel enlargement was constant; femoral tunnel enlargement was significant (>2 mm) in 27.6% of the knees. No femoral tunnel diameter modification corresponding to the EndoButton passage was observed.

DISCUSSION

The results of this series are comparable to the results of other series. Its reproducibility and the absence of iatrogenic complications for this femoral EndoButton CL fixation make it a top-choice technique, like the corticocancellous graft procedures, but without their disadvantages. No secondary elongation attributable to the EndoButton CL was observed. This femoral fixation procedure appeared necessary and sufficient to providing good mechanical stability for the graft in the femoral tunnel.

Independent drilling outperforms conventional transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Optimal tunnel placement is critical in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery, yet the method used to drill the tunnels may compromise their placement.

HYPOTHESIS

An independent drilling method versus a conventional transtibial drilling method will place tunnels in different locations and produce reconstructions with different kinematics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten pairs of knees had anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions produced by either a conventional transtibial drilling method or an independent drilling method. The location of the tunnels was recorded, and the knees were tested for laxity in the normal state, with the anterior cruciate ligament removed, and with the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed. A surgical navigation system guided the placement of the independently drilled tunnels and measured joint laxity in response to various combinations of anterior force and rotational torques.

RESULTS

The conventional transtibial drilling method used in this study placed tibial tunnels posterior and femoral tunnels superior relative to their footprints and resulted in more vertical grafts. In contrast, the independently drilled tibial and femoral tunnels were more anterior and central in their respective footprints, resulting in more horizontal grafts. The horizontal grafts of the independent drilling method were superior to the vertical grafts of this study's transtibial drilling method in restoring normal anterior and rotational knee laxity.

CONCLUSION

An independent drilling method can produce tunnels with superior function compared with tunnels produced by a conventional transtibial drilling method.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions will be improved if grafts are centered in their anatomical insertions by an independent drilling method versus grafts placed by a conventional transtibial drilling method.

Comparative study of knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without fluoroscopic assistance: a prospective study of 73 cases

INTRODUCTION

Correct placement of both tibial and femoral tunnels is one of the main factors for a favorable clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We used an original system of computer assisted surgery (CAS). The system, based on fluoroscopic guidance combined with special graphical software of image analyzing, showed to the surgeon, before drilling, the recommended placement of tibial and femoral tunnel centers. We compared the first anatomical and clinical results of this procedure to the usual one single incision technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective study on 73 patients; 37 patients were operated on with CAS and 36 without CAS, by the same senior surgeon. The mean age was 27 years for both groups. Every patient was reviewed at an average of 2.2 years (range 1-4.5) by an independent observer, using IKDC scoring system, KT-1000, and passive stress radiographs.

RESULTS

Time between ACL rupture and reconstruction averaged 30 months for both groups. CAS needed 9.3 min extra surgery time. Clinical evaluation was graded from A to C as per the IKDC scoring system: 67.6% A, 29.7% B, 2.7% C with CAS; and 60% A, 37.1% B, 2.9% C without CAS. IKDC subjective knee evaluation score averaged 89.7 with CAS and 89.5 without CAS. Pre operative KT-1000 maxi manual differential laxity averaged 7. At revision time, all the patients after CAS had a differential laxity less than 2 and 97.7% without CAS. Stress X-rays differential laxity averaged 2.4 mm with CAS and 3 mm without CAS. The area of dispersion of the tunnels' center was smaller on the femoral side using the CAS method. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups using IKDC score, KT-1000 and passive stress radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAS method provided a more accurate and reproducible tunnels placement without clinical significant effect.

Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement

Recent improvements in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been notable for strategies to improve ACL healing and to improve graft placements. The controversial choice of 1-bundle or 2-bundle grafts requires an advanced knowledge of native ACL insertional anatomy and an appreciation for the kinematic effects of graft placements. Understanding the limitations of surgical techniques to place tunnels is important. Once grafts are placed, new biologic strategies to promote intra-articular and intraosseous healing are evolving. Although these biologic engineering strategies are currently experimental, they are projected for clinical application in the near future.

Anatomical limitations of transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Recommended techniques for transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are based on strategies to prevent graft impingement and preserve tibial tunnel length. The limitations of this drilling technique may restrict the ability to centralize tunnels in the anterior cruciate ligament footprints.

HYPOTHESIS

A transtibial drilling starting point to centralize the tibial and femoral tunnels in their respective footprints can be identified, but it will result in a short tibial tunnel.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

The femoral and tibial attachments of the anterior cruciate ligament were characterized in 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. Knees were secured in 70 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion. A guide pin was drilled antegrade through the central femoral and proximal anterior cruciate ligament attachment sites through the central tibial anterior cruciate ligament attachment site to exit on the anterior tibia.

RESULTS

In 90 degrees of flexion using the central femoral and tibial attachment sites, the exit point of the pin on the anterior tibia was 14.1 mm from the tibial joint line and 20.9 mm anterior to the superficial medial collateral ligament. The length of the pin in the tibia was 30.6 mm. Extending the knee to 70 degrees or directing the pin through the proximal femoral anterior cruciate ligament attachment moved the starting point less than 4 mm from this point.

CONCLUSION

The transtibial technique can produce tunnels centered in the anterior cruciate ligament footprints, but a starting point close to the tibial joint line is required. This will result in a relatively short tibial tunnel.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

If tunnels centered in the anterior cruciate ligament attachment sites are desired with the transtibial drilling technique, then a short tibial tunnel is necessary. A short tibial tunnel may compromise graft fixation and graft incorporation, or it may result in a tunnel length-graft length mismatch. An alternative drilling strategy might be employed.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction due to knee instability

Introduction. The primary goal of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is to provide stability to the knee and regain full range of motion. Although great improvement has been achieved in surgical techniques and rehabilitation, some patients are not completely satisfied with the results of surgery and a revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is necessary. Material and Methods. Revision arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was carried out in eleven patients with bone-tendon-bone autografts. The surgery was performed in a standard manner and the graft was taken from the opposite knee. Eight men and three women were evaluated. The mean age of patients was 26 (17-34) years. Repeated instability of the knee was caused by injury in five patients, while six patients were unsatisfied with the position of the graft. Results. The follow up was 4,2 years (2-8) respectively. The mean Lysholm and Gillquist score after operation was 88 (65-90). Preoperative and postoperative tibial shift was 9mm (6-15) and 2mm (0-4), respectively. The preoperative pivot shift test was grade 2 and 3 in all patients. Postoperative pivot shift test was negative in seven patients, in three it was grade 1 and grade 2 in one patient. According to the IKDC scale, preoperative results were abnormal in three patients and in eight they were severely abnormal. Postoperative IKDC score was normal in five patients, in four nearly normal, and in one patient the score was still abnormal. Five patients continued to be active in sports activities, four patients decreased the level of sports activity and two stopped all sports activities. Conclusion. Success of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction requires detailed preoperative evaluation of the repeated instability of the knee. The treatment plan is then decided upon. The patients must be preoperatively informed about the real possibilities of revision surgery. Only a mutual collaboration between the patient, physiatrist and a surgeon is a key for successful treatment and return to previous level of sports activities.

Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Failed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction presents a difficult clinical challenge. Successful revision ACL reconstruction depends on identifying the causes of failure and correcting technical or diagnostic errors. Failed ACL reconstruction may be either traumatic or atraumatic. Atraumatic failures may be attributable to technical errors, diagnostic errors, or failure of graft incorporation. Published outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction have been worse than for primary ACL reconstruction. The preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction are reviewed.