Peritoneal leukocyte survival and respiratory burst responses in patients treated with a low glucose degradation and high pH peritoneal dialysis fluid

Short-Term Effects of a New Bicarbonate/Lactate-Buffered and Conventional Peritoneal Dialysis Fluid on Peritoneal and Systemic Inflammation in CAPD Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objectives

This study was designed to compare the local peritoneal and systemic inflammatory effects of a conventional lactate-based (Lac) peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution and a new biocompatible bicarbonate/lactate-based (Bic/ Lac) solution having low concentration of glucose degradation products.

Methods

26 stable, prevalent PD patients were enrolled in this prospective study. They sequentially underwent 3 months of therapy with the Lac solution and 3 months with the Bic/Lac solution in a randomized order. Flow cytometry was used to measure the expression of inflammatory molecules on peritoneal cells in overnight effluent collected at the end of each study period.

Results

21 patients successfully completed the study. Mean fluorescence intensity of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR and CD14 expression by macrophages were not different between Lac and Bic/Lac. The peritoneal appearance rate of cancer antigen 125 (kU/minute) was 68 ± 37 with Lac and 133 ± 66 with Bic/Lac ( p < 0.001), and of interleukin (IL)-6 (ng/minute), 0.28 ± 0.2 with Lac and 0.18 ± 0.16 with Bic/Lac ( p = 0.014). HLA-DR macrophage expression and IL-6 peritoneal appearance rates did not correlate. Serum concentrations with Lac and Bic/Lac were, for IL-6, 3.49 ± 2.28 and 3.72 ± 2.46 ng/L ( p = 0.17), and for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, 2.31 ± 2.98 and 2.71 ± 3.31 mg/L ( p = 0.32) respectively. The concentration of effluent macrophages (x106/L) with Lac was 1.6 ± 1.6 and with Bic/Lac 2.6 ± 3.3 ( p = 0.07).

Conclusions

We conclude that, although there was a significant reduction in peritoneal IL-6 in patients using Bic/ Lac solution, systemic levels of inflammatory markers did not differ between the two solutions and no changes were present in macrophage surface activation markers, suggesting perhaps a less important role of peritoneal macrophages in the intraperitoneal chronic inflammatory process. The number of effluent macrophages tended to be higher in patients using the Bic/Lac solution, possibly contributing to improved intraperitoneal defense.

How to Avoid Glucose Degradation Products in Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids

Objective

The formation of glucose degradation products (GDPs) during sterilization of peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) is one of the most important aspects of biocompatibility of glucose-containing PDFs. Producers of PDFs are thus trying to minimize the level of GDPs in their products. 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene (3,4-DGE) has been identified as the most bioreactive GDP in PDFs. It exists in a temperature-dependent equilibrium with a pool of 3-deoxyglucosone (3-DG) and is a precursor in the irreversible formation of 5-hydroxymethyl furaldehyde (5-HMF). The aim of the present study was to investigate how to minimize GDPs in PDFs and how different manufacturers have succeeded in doing so.

Design

Glucose solutions at different pHs and concentrations were heat sterilized and 3-DG, 3,4-DGE, 5-HMF, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde were analyzed. Conventional as well as biocompatible fluids from different manufacturers were analyzed in parallel for GDP concentrations.

Results

The concentrations of 3-DG and 3,4-DGE produced during heat sterilization decreased when pH was reduced to about 2. Concentration of 5-HMF decreased when pH was reduced to 2.6. After further decrease to a pH of 2.0, concentration of 5-HMF increased slightly, and below a pH of 2.0 it increased considerably, together with formaldehyde; 3-DG continued to drop and 3,4-DGE remained constant. Inhibition of cell growth was paralleled by 3,4-DGE concentration at pH 2.0 – 6.0. A high glucose concentration lowered concentrations of 3,4-DGE and 3-DG at pH 5.5 and of 5-HMF at pH 1. At pH 2.2 and 3.2, glucose concentration had a minor effect on the formation of GDPs. All conventional PDFs contained high levels of 3,4-DGE and 3-DG. Concentrations were considerably lower in the biocompatible fluids. However, the concentration of 5-HMF was slightly higher in all the biocompatible fluids.

Conclusion

The best way to avoid reactive GDPs is to have a pH between 2.0 and 2.6 during sterilization. If pHs outside this range are used, it becomes more important to have high glucose concentration during the sterilization process. There are large variations in GDPs, both within and between biocompatible and conventionally manufactured PDFs.

"Biocompatible" Neutral pH Low-GDP Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions: Much Ado About Nothing?

Adverse outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD), including PD related infections, the loss of residual kidney function (RKF), and longitudinal, deleterious changes in peritoneal membrane function continue to limit the long-term success of PD therapy. The observation that these deleterious changes occur upon exposure to conventional glucose-based PD solutions fuels the search for a more biocompatible PD solution. The development of a novel PD solution with a neutral pH, and lower in glucose degradation products (GDPs) compared to its conventional predecessors has been labeled a "biocompatible" solution. While considerable evidence in support of these novel solutions' biocompatibility has emerged from cell culture and animal studies, the clinical benefits as compared to conventional PD solutions are less clear. Neutral pH low GDP (NpHLGDP) PD solutions appear to be effective in reducing infusion pain, but their effects on other clinical endpoints including peritoneal membrane function, preservation of RKF, PD-related infections, and technique and patient survival are less clear. The literature is limited by studies characterized by relatively few patients, short follow-up time, heterogeneity with regards to the novel PD solution type under study, and the different patient populations under study. Nonetheless, the search for a more biocompatible PD solution continues with emerging data on promising non glucose-based solutions.

Low GDP Solution and Glucose-Sparing Strategies for Peritoneal Dialysis

Long-term exposure to a high glucose concentration in conventional peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution has a number of direct and indirect (via glucose degradation products [GDP]) detrimental effects on the peritoneal membrane, as well as systemic metabolism. Glucose- or GDP-sparing strategies often are hypothesized to confer clinical benefits to PD patients. Icodextrin (glucose polymer) solution improves peritoneal ultrafiltration and reduces the risk of fluid overload, but these beneficial effects are probably the result of better fluid removal rather than being glucose sparing. Although frequently used for glucose sparing, the role of amino acid-based solution in this regard has not been tested thoroughly. When glucose-free solutions are used in a combination regimen, published studies showed that glycemic control was improved significantly in diabetic PD patients, and there probably are beneficial effects on peritoneal function. However, the long-term effects of glucose-free solutions, used either alone or as a combination regimen, require further studies. On the other hand, neutral pH-low GDP fluids have been shown convincingly to preserve residual renal function and urine volume. The cost effectiveness of these solutions supports the regular use of neutral pH-low GDP solutions. Nevertheless, further studies are required to determine whether neutral pH-low GDP solutions exert beneficial effects on patient-level outcomes, such as peritonitis, technique survival, and patient survival.