Prevention of Acute Renal Failure - Fluid Repletion and Colloids

Diuretic responses to Ringer's solution and 20% albumin at different arterial pressures

Intravenous volume loading is a common treatment when hypovolemia is a potential cause of oliguria. We studied whether the effectiveness of Ringer's solution and 20% albumin in inducing diuresis differs depending on the mean arterial pressure (MAP). For this purpose, volume kinetic analysis was performed based on urine output and hemoglobin-derived plasma dilution obtained during and after 136 infusions of Ringer and 85 infusions of 20% albumin. Covariance analysis quantified the diuretic response at different arterial pressures. The results show that the diuretic response to a known plasma volume expansion was greater for Ringer's solution above a MAP of 70 mmHg, while 20% albumin was significantly more effective at lower pressures (p < 0.03). Simulations of the urinary output in response to infusion of a predefined fluid volume yielded superior efficacy for 20% albumin when the MAP was low, while Ringer's was similarly effective when the MAP averaged 100 mmHg. In conclusion, urine output in response to plasma volume expansion with 20% albumin was similar to, or even stronger, than that of Ringer's solution when the MAP was below 70 mmHg.

[The "Seville" Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion. Sociedades españolas de Anestesiología (SEDAR), Medicina Intensiva (SEMICYUC), Hematología y Hemoterapia (AEHH), Transfusión sanguínea (SETS) Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH)]

The Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion (AABT) has been drawn up by a panel of experts from 5 scientific societies. The Spanish Societies of Anesthesiology (SEDAR), Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), Hematology and Hemotherapy (AEHH), Blood Transfusion (SETS) and Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH) have sponsored and participated in this Consensus Document. Alternatives to blood transfusion have been divided into pharmacological and non-pharmacological, with 4 modules and 12 topics. The main objective variable was the reduction of allogenic blood transfusions and/or the number of transfused patients. The extent to which this objective was achieved by each AABT was evaluated using the Delphi method, which classifies the grade of recommendation from A (supported by controlled studies) to E (non-controlled studies and expert opinion). The experts concluded that most of the indications for AABT were based on middle or low grades of recommendation, "C", "D", or "E", thus indicating the need for further controlled studies.

Is perioperative low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch infusion a risk factor for delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients?

BACKGROUND

Crystalloid or colloid fluids may be utilized during kidney transplantation. Histopathological and clinical data indicate that hydroxyethyl starch (HES) may have nephrotoxic potential.

METHODS

This retrospective single-centre cohort study screened 192 and included 113 patients who underwent renal transplantation between 2003 and 2007 at University of Leipzig Medical Faculty, Germany. The primary outcome parameter was delayed graft function (DGF). Patients were divided into two groups. Patients in group CRYS (N = 73) received crystalloid solution (acetated Ringer's or normal saline) only. Patients in the group HES (N = 40) received a minimum of 500 mL 6% HES 130/0.4 and additional crystalloid solution by discretion of the transplant team.

RESULTS

Patients in both groups did not differ with respect to demographic data and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System scores, except for the donor age, which was significantly lower in the group HES. The rate of DGF was not found to be different in group CRYS (31.5%) when compared to group HES (32.5%) (P = 1.00, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, infusion of low molecular weight 6% HES 130/0.4 during and after renal transplantation was found to have no significant negative effect upon the rate of DGF.