Whole Blood Selective LDL-Apheresis: A Comparison of Two Different Adsorbers

Different inflammatory responses induced by three LDL-lowering apheresis columns

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is well-established in selected patients with uncontrolled LDL levels. As such treatment affects biomarkers important in atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes, we systematically compared the inflammatory response induced by three LDL apheresis columns. Three patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia participated in a cross-over study with six consecutive treatments with three different LDL apheresis columns: DL-75 (whole blood adsorption), LA-15 (plasma adsorption), and EC-50W (plasma filtration). Biochemical parameters and inflammatory biomarkers, including complement activation products and 27 cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors were measured before and after treatment. Complement was activated through the alternative pathway. The final end product sC5b-9 increased significantly (P < 0.01) and equally with all devices, whereas the anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a were lower by use of the adsorption columns. Hs-CRP was reduced by 77% (DL-75), 72% (LA-15), and 43% (EC-50W). The cytokines were consistently either increased (IL-1ra, IP-10, MCP-1), decreased (IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, RANTES, PDGF, VEGF), or hardly changed (including IL-6, IL8, MIP-1alphabeta) during treatment. The changes were in general less pronounced with the adsorption columns. All columns reduced LDL significantly and to the same extent. In conclusion, three LDL-apheresis devices with equal cholesterol-lowering effect differed significantly with respect to the inflammatory response.

LDL-apheresis: indications and clinical experience in a tertiary cardiac centre

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of liposorber D low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis system in high-risk cardiac patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 466 treatments undertaken in eight patients with coronary heart disease. Five patients had severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), one had severe hypertriglyceridaemia and two were cardiac transplant recipients with FH intolerant to statins. Acute reductions during single sessions and preprocedural long-term changes in lipoprotein subfractions, laboratory safety parameters, adverse events and clinical outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

In 352 treatments performed in seven patients, acute reductions averaged 52.8% (standard deviation: 8.61%) for total cholesterol (TC), 61.8% (10.13%) for LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), 21.1% (9.66%) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), 71.1% (median) for lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and 44.5% (14.42%) for triglycerides (p < 0.05). Long-term reductions of TC, LDL-C, Lp(a) and triglycerides by 18.1%, 21.7%, 9.4% (median) and 19.8%, respectively, were achieved. HDL-C was increased by 7.5%. Results from the patient with severe hypertriglyceridaemia were analysed separately because of markedly elevated TC and triglycerides. Technical and clinical complications were mild and showed an incidence of 16.65% and 12.45% respectively. The most common clinical event was transient hypotension (5.8%), whereas vascular access difficulties (11.3%) represented a common technical problem. All patients demonstrated clinical improvement. However, two patients treated via a central line developed septicaemia, resulting in endocarditis in one of them.

CONCLUSION

Liposorber D is a simple, safe and effective modality in reducing atherogenic lipoproteins in dyslipidaemic high-risk cardiac patients. The treatment via an arteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access in this type of patient.