The Influence of Different Cultivation Conditions on the Metabolic Functionality of Encapsulated Primary Hepatocytes

Cell microencapsulation technologies for sustained drug delivery: Latest advances in efficacy and biosafety

The development of cell microencapsulation systems began several decades ago. However, today few systems have been tested in clinical trials. For this reason, in the last years, researchers have directed efforts towards trying to solve some of the key aspects that still limit efficacy and biosafety, the two major criteria that must be satisfied to reach the clinical practice. Regarding the efficacy, which is closely related to biocompatibility, substantial improvements have been made, such as the purification or chemical modification of the alginates that normally form the microspheres. Each of the components that make up the microcapsules has been carefully selected to avoid toxicities that can damage the encapsulated cells or generate an immune response leading to pericapsular fibrosis. As for the biosafety, researchers have developed biological circuits capable of actively responding to the needs of the patients to precisely and accurately release the demanded drug dose. Furthermore, the structure of the devices has been subject of study to adequately protect the encapsulated cells and prevent their spread in the body. The objective of this review is to describe the latest advances made by scientist to improve the efficacy and biosafety of cell microencapsulation systems for sustained drug delivery, also highlighting those points that still need to be optimized.

Advances in cell encapsulation technology and its application in drug delivery

INTRODUCTION

Cell encapsulation technology has improved enormously since it was proposed 50 years ago. The advantages offered over other alternative systems, such as the prevention of repetitive drug administration, have triggered the use of this technology in multiple therapeutic applications.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, improvements in cell encapsulation technology and strategies to overcome the drawbacks that prevent its use in the clinic have been summarized and discussed. Different studies and clinical trials that have been performed in several therapeutic applications have also been described.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors believe that the future translation of this technology from bench to bedside requires the optimization of diverse aspects: i) biosafety, controlling and monitoring cell viability; ii) biocompatibility, reducing pericapsular fibrotic growth and hypoxia suffered by the graft; iii) control over drug delivery; iv) and the final scale up. On the other hand, an area that deserves more attention is the cryopreservation of encapsulated cells as this will facilitate the arrival of these biosystems to the clinic.

Alginate microencapsulation technology for the percutaneous delivery of adipose-derived stem cells

BACKGROUND

Autologous fat is the ideal soft-tissue filler; however, its widespread application is limited because of variable clinical results and poor survival. Engineered fillers have the potential to maximize survival. Alginate is a hydrogel copolymer that can be engineered into spheres of <200 μm, thus facilitating mass transfer, allowing for subcutaneous injection, and protecting cells from shearing forces.

METHODS

Alginate powder was dissolved in saline, and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) were encapsulated (1 million cells/mL) in alginate using an electrostatic bead generator. To assess effects of injection on cell viability, microspheres containing ADSCs were separated into 2 groups: the control group was decanted into culture wells and the injection group was mixed with basal media and injected through a 21-gauge needle into culture wells. Microbeads were cultured for 3 weeks, and cell number and viability were measured weekly using electron and confocal microscopy. To assess effects of percutaneous injection in vivo, twenty-four male nude mice were randomly separated into 2 groups and injected with either empty microcapsules or ADSC-laden microcapsules. Mice were harvested at 1 and 3 months, and the implants were examined microscopically to assess bead and cell viability.

RESULTS

A flow rate of 5 mL/h and an electrostatic potential of 7 kV produced viable ADSC-laden microbeads of <200 μm. There were no differences in bead morphology and ADSC viability between microcapsules placed versus injected into tissue culture plates for up to 3 weeks. Microspheres implanted in a nude mouse model show durability up to 3 months with a host response around each individual sphere. ADSCs remained viable and showed signs of mitosis.

CONCLUSIONS

ADSCs can be readily cultured, encapsulated, and injected in alginate microspheres. Stem cells suspended in alginate microspheres survive in vivo and are seen to replicate in vitro.