Biocompatibility of a polymer-coated membrane possessing a hydrophilic blood-contacting layer: Adsorption-related assessment

Comparison of complement consumption and platelet accumulation between membrane oxygenators coated with a polymer or heparin

INTRODUCTION

The membrane oxygenator in extracorporeal circulation circuits is coated with acrylate-copolymer (ACP) or immobilized heparin (IHP) to enhance hemocompatibility. To evaluate the relative features of both coatings, we compared blood components circulated in the circuits with ACP-and IHP-coated membranes in vitro using whole human blood.

METHODS

Whole human blood was heparinized and circulated in two experimental circuits with an ACP-coated reservoir, tubes, and an ACP- or IHP-coated membrane. Platelet (PLT) counts and the amount of total protein (TP), complement component 3 (C3), and complement component 4 (C4) were measured at 0, 8, 16, 24, and 32 h in each experiment (n = 5).

RESULTS

The PLT count at 0-h circulation was lower in the IHP-coated than in the ACP-coated circuits (p = 0.034); however, no significant difference was observed at other time points. Reduction in TP at 8-h and 16-h circulation and in C3 at 32-h circulation was lesser in the ACP-coated than in the IHP-coated circuits (p = 0.004, 0.034, and 0.027, respectively); reduction in TP and C3 at other time points and C4 at each time point was not significantly different. There were significant interactions between coating type and circulation duration in the PLT, TP, and C3 transitions (p = 0.008, 0.020, and 0.043, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ACP-coated membranes can prevent the initial drop in PLT count and C3 consumption over 32 h, whereas IHP-coated membranes could not prevent this drop in extracorporeal circulation. Therefore, ACP-coated membranes are suitable for short- and long-term extracorporeal life support.

Activity of anticoagulant proteins on the polymer-coated and heparin-coated membranes in an extracorporeal circulation circuit

INTRODUCTION

We performed in vitro experiments using whole human blood without anticoagulants to clarify the activity of anticoagulant proteins on membranes coated with acrylate-copolymer (ACP) with a hydrophilic blood-contacting layer compared to those coated by immobilizing heparin (IHP) in extracorporeal circulation.

METHODS

Whole human blood from healthy volunteers was recirculated in two types of experimental circuits with an ACP-coated reservoir and tubes and an ACP-coated or IHP-coated membrane. To compare the fluctuation of anticoagulant proteins, the circuit pressure at the inlet and outlet of the membrane was measured every 5 min; antithrombin antigen (ATQ), antithrombin activity, protein-C quantitation (PCQ), protein-C activity, protein-S free antigen (PSQ), and protein-S activity were measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min in each experiment (n = 5).

RESULTS

The time taken to achieve high circuit pressure (> 300 mmHg) at the inlet of the membrane was significantly shorter in the ACP-coated membrane circuit (28 ± 2.7 min) than in the IHP-coated membrane circuit (54 ± 24 min); however, the ATQ, PCQ, and PSQ at 180 min of recirculation were significantly higher in the former than in the latter (all p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

ACP-coated membranes can prevent the consumption of anticoagulant proteins but cannot delay circuit thrombogenicity compared to IHP-coated membranes. Considering patient care during the post-extracorporeal circulation period, the use of ACP coating, which can preserve anticoagulant protein, is better in extracorporeal circulation circuits.

Desialylation of platelet surface glycans enhances platelet adhesion to adsorbent polymers for lipoprotein apheresis

Background:

Lipoprotein apheresis is an important therapeutic option in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, progressive atherosclerosis, or when depletion of lipoprotein(a) is indicated. It is generally regarded as safe, but drops in platelet counts as well as sporadic episodes of thrombocytopenia have been reported. We assessed the influence of platelet desialylation, which may be induced by endogenous or pathogen-derived neuraminidases, on platelet adhesion to polyacrylate-based adsorbents for whole blood lipoprotein apheresis.

Methods:

Medical grade platelet concentrates were incubated with neuraminidase in vitro and were circulated over adsorbent columns downscaled from clinical application.

Results:

Cleavage of terminal sialic residues resulted in platelet activation with significantly elevated expression of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and in enhanced platelet adhesion to the adsorbent, accompanied by a pronounced drop in platelet counts in the column flow-through.

Conclusion:

Alterations in endogenous neuraminidase activity or exogenous (pathogen-derived) neuraminidase may trigger enhanced platelet adhesion in whole blood lipoprotein apheresis.