Addressing the functional needs of left ventricular assist device candidates: Development and feasibility of an occupational therapy pre-operative evaluation

BACKGROUND

Everyday living with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is complex, particularly for people with physical or cognitive impairments or limited social supports. There is a need for standardized pre-operative functional evaluations.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to describe a pre-operative occupational therapy (OT) evaluation for LVAD candidates, assess its feasibility in routine care, and characterize functional needs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of pre-operative OT consultations for LVAD candidates over four years (n = 209). Occupational profile, vision, and sensation were operationalized from documentation narratives. Daily functioning was measured with Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, grip strength with dynamometer, cognition with Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Allen Cognitive Level Screen-5, and LVAD self-management with a performance-based ordinal scale.

RESULTS

89.5 % of consultations were completed, averaging 61.2 min (n = 187): 79.1 % (148/187) inpatient and 20.9 % (39/187) outpatient. Patients completed 87.7 % (164/187) to 100.0 % (187/187) of evaluation components. 21.9 % (41/187) of candidates lived alone. 6.4 % (12/187) and 7.0 % (13/185) had visual and sensory dysfunction. 57.4 % were independent with daily activities (104/181). 17.7 % (32/181) had impaired grip strength. 69.3 % (124/179) had impaired cognition, 29.7 % (51/172) with impaired functional cognition for everyday activities. 88.4 % (145/164) required physical or cueing assistance while practicing LVAD batteries management. OTs interpreted that 20.9 % (39/187) would likely require 24/7 post-operative support with LVAD self-care.

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative OT evaluations were feasible and emphasized complex functional needs. Assessing LVAD self-care abilities may inform candidacy and facilitate early interventions to optimize functioning. OT should be consulted within interprofessional teams for all LVAD candidates.

A new opportunity for patient selection and optimization: Systematic review of cognitive frailty in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation

The prognostic implication of cognitive frailty assessment in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate assessment strategies and their significance for patients undergoing LVAD implantation. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception until September 2022 and a review of meeting proceedings were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies that investigated the prognostic value of cognitive frailty or any related cognition-based assessment in patients undergoing LVAD implantation were included. Study characteristics, patient demographics, and type of cognitive assessment were extracted. Primary outcomes included length of stay, readmissions, and all-cause mortality. Of 664 records retrieved, 12 (4 prospective, 8 retrospective) involving 16 737 subjects (mean age, 56.9 years; 78.3% men) met inclusion criteria; 67% of studies used the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to assess cognitive frailty. Outcomes reported were highly variable, with 42% reporting readmission, 33% reporting LOS, and 83% reporting mortality data; only two studies provided data on all three. Cognitive frailty was associated with prolonged length of stay in 75% of studies reporting this outcome. Only 40% and 60% of studies that reported readmissions and mortality outcomes, respectively, suggested a predictive association. Pre-LVAD cognitive frailty is likely associated with worse outcomes postimplant. However, the heterogenous reporting of outcomes data and lack of consistent definitions in the literature limit its prognostic value. Additional research on markers for cognitive frailty and improved standards of reporting may allow for future analyses and enhance preoperative risk assessment and patient care. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 204-210.

Impairments identified by comprehensive geriatric assessment in potential candidates for left ventricular assist device and heart transplantation

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of frailty and other impairments in potential left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplantation (HTx) candidates by performing a preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and reviewing the treatment recommendations resulting from the CGA.

Methods and results

This cross-sectional study included 73 patients aged ≥40 years who received a CGA as part of the patient selection procedure for LVAD and HTx. In every patient, a conclusion comprising frailty and other impairments was formulated based on the medical, mental, functional, and social domains and recommendations were made. The mean age was 58 years (range 40-71) and 70 % were male. In 97 % of patients, at least one impairment was identified by the CGA. The most common impairments were polypharmacy, high morbidity burden, reduced renal function, osteopenia, depression, poor quality of life, reduced functionality, (risk of) malnutrition, reduced grip strength and high caregiver burden. A small proportion of the potential LVAD and HTx candidates were frail (7 % according to Fried's frailty criteria, 6 % according to the Edmonton Frail Scale) and 39 % were pre-frail. The domains for which most impairments were found and the domains for which most treatment recommendations were given matched well, with the functional domain as the frontrunner.

Conclusion

This study showed that most of the potential candidates for LVAD or HTx have impairments on at least one domain of the CGA. Impairments and associated risks can contribute to the decision making process for candidacy for LVAD and HTx.

Multidisciplinary Care in Heart Failure Services

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of American 2022 guidelines for heart failure (HF) recommend a multidisciplinary team approach for patients with HF. The multidisciplinary HF team-based approach decreases the hospitalization rate for HF and health care costs and improves adherence to self-care and the use of guideline-directed medical therapy. This article proposes the optimal multidisciplinary team structure and each team member's delineated role to achieve institutional goals and metrics for HF care. The proposed HF-specific multidisciplinary team comprises cardiologists, surgeons, advanced practice providers, clinical pharmacists, specialty nurses, dieticians, physical therapists, psychologists, social workers, immunologists, and palliative care clinicians. A standardized multidisciplinary HF team-based approach should be incorporated to optimize the structure, minimize the redundancy of clinical responsibilities among team members, and improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in their HF care.

Neurologic Complications in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use has revolutionised the care of patients with advanced heart failure, allowing more patients to survive until heart transplantation and providing improved quality for patients unable to undergo transplantation. Despite these benefits, improvements in device technology, and better clinical care and experience, LVADs are associated with neurologic complications. This review provides information on the incidence, risk factors, and management of neurologic complications among LVAD patients. Although scant guidelines exist for the evaluation and management of neurologic complications in LVAD patients, a high index of suspicion can prompt early detection of neurologic complications which may improve overall neurologic outcomes. A better understanding of the implications of continuous circulatory flow on systemic and cerebral vasculature is necessary to reduce the common occurrence of neurologic complications in this population.

Cognition predicts days-alive-out-of-hospital after LVAD implantation

OBJECTIVE

Cognition influences hospitalization rates for a variety of patient groups but this association has not been examined in heart failure (HF) patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We used cognition to predict days-alive-out-of-hospital (DAOH) in patients after LVAD surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 59 HF patients with cognitive assessment prior to LVAD. Cognitive tests of attention, memory, language, and visual motor speed were averaged into one score. DAOH was converted to a percentage based on total days from LVAD surgery to either heart transplant or 900 days post-LVAD. Variables significantly associated with DAOH in univariate analyses were included in a linear regression model to predict DAOH.

RESULTS

A linear regression model including LVAD type (continuous or pulsatile flow) and cognition significantly predicted DAOH (F(2,54) = 6.44, p = 0.003, R² = .19). Inspection of each variable revealed that cognition was a significant predictor in the model (β = .11, SE = .04, p = 0.007) but LVAD type was not (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive performance assessed prior to LVAD implantation predicted how much time patients spent out of the hospital following surgery. Further studies are warranted to identify the impact of pre-LVAD cognition on post-LVAD hospitalization.