Ion-Exchange Resin Anticoagulation (I-ERA): A Novel Extracorporeal Technique for Regional Anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal treatments always require blood anticoagulation. We tested feasibility and efficacy of a novel technique for regional extracorporeal blood anticoagulation based on calcium removal by ion-exchange resins (i-ER), called ion-exchange resin anticoagulation (i-ERA).

METHODS

Eight swine were connected to a veno-venous extracorporeal circuit comprising a hemodiafilter and an i-ER. Blood flow was 150 mL/min. Hemodiafiltrate was generated at 975 mL/min and passed through the i-ER. A fraction of the calcium-free hemodiafiltrate was returned to the hemodiafilter (675 mL/min), while the remaining was recirculated prior the hemodiafilter (300 mL/min) to dilute blood entering the hemodiafilter. A calcium replacement solution was continuously infused. Two hours after i-ERA start, blood was sampled from inlet, before the hemodiafilter (prehemodiafilter blood) and from outlet of the extracorporeal circuit for ionized calcium (iCa) concentration and thromboelastography (TEG). Arterial blood was collected for blood gas analyses, electrolytes concentrations, and plasma free hemoglobin. Hemodynamics and ventilation were monitored.

RESULTS

i-ERA reduced iCa from 1.28 ± 0.05 mmol/L (inlet) to 0.47 ± 0.03 mmol/L (prehemodiafilter blood) and 0.25 ± 0.03 mmol/L (outlet). Prehemodiafilter blood and outlet samples showed no sign of clot formation (reaction time (R) >60 min; maximal amplitude (MA) = 0 (0-0) mm), while blood-inlet had normal coagulation (R = 8.5 (5.8-10.2) min; MA = 65.2 (63.2-68.7) mm). Arterial gas analyses and electrolytes concentrations, hemodynamics, and ventilation were unchanged. No hemolysis was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

In a swine model, i-ERA proved feasible and effective in reducing iCa and preventing clot formation with TEG analyses. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of i-ERA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V-therapeutic animal experiment.

Modular extracorporeal life support: effects of ultrafiltrate recirculation on the performance of an extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal device

The combination of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) and hemofiltration is a possible therapeutic strategy for patients needing both lung and renal support. We tested the effects of the recirculation of ultrafiltrate on membrane lung (ML) CO2 removal (VCO2ML). Three conscious, spontaneously breathing sheep were connected to a commercially produced ECCO2R device (Hemolung; Alung Technologies, Pittsburgh, PA) with a blood flow of 250 ml/min and a gas flow of 10 L/min. A hemofilter (NxStage, NxStage Medical, Lawrence, MA) was interposed in series after the ML. Ultrafiltrate flow was generated and recirculated before the ML. We tested four ultrafiltrate flows (0, 50, 100, and 150 ml/min) for 25 min each, eight times per animal, resulting in 24 randomized test repetitions. We recorded VCO2ML, hemodynamics and ventilatory variables, and natural lung CO2 transfer (VCO2NL) and collected arterial and circuitry blood samples. VCO2ML was unchanged by application of ultrafiltrate recirculation (40.5 ± 4.0, 39.7 ± 4.2, 39.8 ± 4.2, and 39.2 ± 4.1 ml/min, respectively, at ultrafiltrate flow of 0, 50, 100, and 150 ml/min). Minute ventilation, respiratory rate, VCO2NL, and arterial blood analyses were not affected by ultrafiltrate recirculation. In the tested configuration, ultrafiltrate recirculation did not affect VCO2ML. This modular technology may provide a suitable platform for coupling CO2 removal with various forms of blood purification.