1
|
Chen Z, Chen X, Li D, Jian J, Yao C, Wei X, Hou J. Comparison of treatments for preventing lower urinary tract symptoms after BCG immunotherapy of bladder tumors : a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Urol 2025; 25:19. [PMID: 39875945 PMCID: PMC11776312 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01675-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy is the standard adjuvant treatment for high-risk, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, BCG immunotherapy is commonly accompanied by significant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including symptoms such as urinary urgency, frequency, dysuria and pelvic pain. These symptoms can undermine treatment adherence and clinical outcomes. In this study, the treatments for preventing LUTS after BCG instillations were compared through a systemic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS Eligible studies were obtained from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. We also searched the references of the included studies. Our protocol followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. We performed NMA using Review Manager 5.3 and STATA MP 18.0. RESULT The analysis included 6 studies with 556 participants. The results of the NMA revealed that celecoxib and prulifloxacin effectivelty reduce the incidence of LUTS including frequency, urgency and dysuria. Phenazopyridine showed the best performance in improving pelvic pain. CONCLUSION The NMA indicated that medications such as celecoxib, prulifloxacin and phenazopyridine are effective in reducing the incidence of LUTS after BCG immunotherapy of bladder tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihao Chen
- Department of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Chen
- Department of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Dingchao Li
- Department of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingang Jian
- Department of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Chang Yao
- Department of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuedong Wei
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China.
| | - Jianquan Hou
- Department of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wong CHM, Ko ICH, Leung DKW, Yuen SKK, Siu B, Yuan Y, Birtle A, Capoun O, Compérat E, Domínguez-Escrig JL, Liedberg F, Mariappan P, Moschini M, Pradere B, Rai BP, van Rhijn BWG, Seisen T, Shariat SF, Soria F, Soukup V, Xylinas EN, Masson-Lecomte A, Gontero P, Leung S, Teoh JYC. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Clinical Impact of Prophylactic Quinolones with Adjuvant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Instillation for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2025:S2588-9311(24)00296-7. [PMID: 39880747 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Revised: 12/13/2024] [Accepted: 12/21/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) reduces disease recurrence and progression in intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). BCG-associated adverse events during instillations are common, leading to treatment cessation. Prophylactic use of quinolones in conjunction with BCG instillations is one approach for reducing BCG-associated adverse events. Our aim was to delineate the clinical impact of quinolone prophylaxis (QP) in patients receiving adjuvant BCG instillations for NMIBC. METHODS In October 2024, a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials was performed. Prospective and retrospective studies reporting comparative outcomes for patients with and without QP during BCG instillations were included. Outcomes were reported in a binary fashion. Random-effects meta-analysis using the weighted mean difference was conducted. Primary outcomes for pooled analyses included BCG-associated toxicities, the completion rate for BCG induction, the likelihood of antituberculosis treatment, and disease recurrence and progression at 12 mo. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The systematic review included five studies. Four randomised controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, and one nonrandomised study was also included in the narrative review. The studies involved 445 patients, of whom 194 received QP + BCG and 251 received BCG alone. QP use was associated with lower incidence of class ≥2 (40.8% vs 54.7%; relative risk [RR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.94; p = 0.006), and class ≥3 BCG-associated toxicities (25.3% vs 36.4%; RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.98; p = 0.04) and a higher completion rate for BCG induction (83.0% vs 70.6%; RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.34; p = 0.04). The 12-mo recurrence rates (14.7% vs 19.4%; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.46-1.27; p = 0.3) and progression rates (4.5% vs 6.4%; RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.09-8.25; p = 0.9) did not significantly differ for QP + BCG versus BCG alone. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The use of QP with adjuvant BCG for NMIBC mitigated debilitating BCG-associated toxicities and improved the completion rate for BCG induction therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Ho-Ming Wong
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ivan Ching-Ho Ko
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - David Ka-Wai Leung
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Steffi Kar-Kei Yuen
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Brian Siu
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Department of Medicine, London Health Science Centre, London, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University Health Science Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Alison Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - José L Domínguez-Escrig
- Jefe Clínico Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Institute of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Praha, Praha, Czechia
| | - Evanguelos N Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Hopital Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Steven Leung
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, Vienna.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rammant E, Fox L, Beyer K, Aaronson NK, Chaloner R, De Padova S, Liedberg F, Wintner LM, Decaestecker K, Fonteyne V, Perdek N, Wylie H, Catto JWF, Ripping TM, Holzner B, Van Leeuwen M, Van Hemelrijck M. The current use of the EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 and QLQ-BLM30 questionnaires for the assessment of health-related quality of life in bladder cancer patients: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2023:10.1007/s11136-022-03335-4. [PMID: 36648569 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03335-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Investigating the use of the EORTC bladder cancer (BC) modules by evaluating: (a) study contexts/designs; (b) languages/countries in which the modules were administered; (c) their acceptance by patients/investigators; and (d) their psychometric properties. METHODS A systematic review was performed with studies from 1998 until 20/10/2021 in five databases. Articles/conference abstracts using the EORTC-QLQBLM30 (muscle invasive BC) and the EORTC-QLQNMIBC24 (previously referred to as QLQ-BLS24; non-muscle invasive BC) were included. Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts/full-texts and performed data extraction. RESULTS A total of 76 eligible studies were identified. Most studies included the BLM30 (n = 53), were in a urological surgery context (n = 41) and were cross-sectional (n = 35) or prospective (n = 30) in design. The BC modules were administered in 14 languages across 19 countries. Missing data were low-moderate for all non-sex related questions (< 1% to 15%). Sex-related questions had higher rates of missing data (ranging from 6.9% to 84%). Most investigators did not use all scales of the questionnaires. One validation study for the original BLS24 led to the development of the NMIBC24, which adopted a new scale structure for which good structural validity was confirmed (n = 3). Good reliability and validity was shown for the NMIBC24 module, except for malaise and bloating/flatulence scales. Psychometric evidence for BLM30 is lacking. CONCLUSION These results provide insight into how the EORTC BC quality of life modules could be further improved. Current work is ongoing to update the modules and to determine if the two modules can be combined into a single questionnaire that works well in both the NMIBC and MIBC settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Rammant
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. .,Translational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - L Fox
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - K Beyer
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Chaloner
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S De Padova
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST), Dino Amadori", 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - F Liedberg
- Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - L M Wintner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - N Perdek
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - H Wylie
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - T M Ripping
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Assessment of content validity for patient-reported outcome measures used in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26:1061-1076. [PMID: 29392479 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4058-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment and endoscopic examinations that are frequent and can be life-long. To ensure the comprehensive assessment of the benefits and harms of treatments for NMIBC, the impact on important and relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) should be determined. We systematically reviewed the NMIBC PRO literature to determine the suitability of available PRO measures (PROMs) for use in evaluating patient outcomes in NMIBC research. METHODS We searched six electronic databases, reference lists, and key authors. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and quality criteria and extracted findings. PROM domains, item content, and content coverage and relevance were determined for identified PROMs. Content validity was assessed against an empirically derived NMIBC-specific conceptual framework that includes 11 PRO domains and 19 sub-domains. RESULTS Seventeen studies assessed PROs related to NMIBC and treatment impact. From these studies, 11 PROMs were identified, including three generic, three cancer-specific, and five symptom-specific. None of the PROMs cover all PRO domains important in NMIBC as assessed against our conceptual framework. The EORTC QLQ-C30 plus the NMIBC24 module was best aligned to the conceptual model, but failed to represent six outcomes important to NMIBC patients. CONCLUSIONS Currently, some outcomes important in NMIBC are inadequately covered by generic and cancer-specific measures despite similar conceptual models. This review identified gaps in the literature regarding assessment of symptoms and other PROs considered important by NMIBC patients. Careful consideration of PROM item content is required when selecting outcome measures for use in future NMIBC clinical trials to ensure that appropriate measures are used to assess outcomes that matter to patients.
Collapse
|