A comparative study between continuous and interrupted sutures in open pyeloplasty

Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in pyeloplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pelvi-ureteric anastomosis is a critical step to ensure good outcome of pyeloplasty. Continuous suturing technique, especially for laparoscopic surgeries, may offer faster operative time while allowing water-tight anastomosis and remains an alternative to interrupted suturing technique. There has been mixed data on comparison of outcomes of continuous and interrupted suturing techniques. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the outcomes of pyeloplasty based on continuous and interrupted suturing techniques. Following protocol registration on PROSPERO (CRD42021269706), a systematic review was performed in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration. A literature search was performed in September 2021 across Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Records comparing pyeloplasty outcomes between continuous and interrupted suture techniques were included. Five studies were identified for inclusion (2 prospective, 3 retrospective). Three studies involved pediatric patients. Three studies exclusively assessed laparoscopic technique. Four outcomes were meta-analyzed: operative time, length of stay, complications, and pyeloplasty failure. Interrupted sutures had longer OR time (mean difference 33.14 min [95% CI 29.35-36.94], p < 0.0001) and length of stay (mean difference 1.08 days [95% CI 0.84-1.32], p < 0.0001). However, there were similar complication (OR 1.73 [95% CI 0.98-3.06], p = 0.06) and failure rates (OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.43-3.43], p = 0.71) between the two suture types. The overall risk of bias in the studies was high. While limited by the number of studies available, continuous sutures for pelvi-ureteric anastomosis appear to confer benefits of faster operative time and decreased length of stay without increasing complication rates or failures.