Fexofenadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria: a clinical and immunohistochemical evaluation

Twenty-five years: The fexofenadine clinical experience

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and urticaria affect a sizable portion of the population worldwide, resulting in reduced quality-of-life and productivity and increased healthcare costs. Fexofenadine (FEX) is a non-sedating second-generation H1 antihistamine with pronounced efficacy and a very good safety profile, used for the treatment of allergic diseases. In addition to its antihistaminic properties, FEX also has anti-inflammatory effects. FEX has a wide therapeutic window and is not associated with any sedative effects, even at higher than recommended doses. There is a need for an integrated management system for AR and urticaria which includes safe and effective treatment options. An ideal anti-allergic formulation should provide fast relief of symptoms and long-lasting effect without drowsiness. Data from randomized clinical trials show that FEX meets these criteria and is an effective treatment option with a favourable safety profile, improving the quality of life of patients suffering from AR and urticaria.

SELE Downregulation Suppresses Mast Cell Accumulation to Protect against Inflammatory Response in Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria

BACKGROUND

Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) represents a common skin disorder often characterized by mast cell activation and secretion of histamine and other proinflammatory factors. E-selectin (SELE) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of common inflammatory cutaneous disorders, while the role of SELE in CIU is yet to be fully understood. Thus, we aimed to investigate the mechanism by which SELE influences CIU in connection with the involvement of mast cells.

METHODS

SELE expression was measured in blood samples obtained from CIU patients and normal individuals. A CIU mouse model was subsequently established by intradermally injecting a normal saline solution with ovalbumin IgE antiserum into the mice. Loss- and gain-of-function investigations were conducted on the mouse models. The number of degranulated mast cells and the amount of histamine release in vitro were determined. The levels of SELE, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, homologous restriction factor (HRF), and interleukin (IL)-6 levels were determined.

RESULTS

The CIU clinical samples exhibited upregulated SELE, while the CIU mice showed increased mast cell degranulation and an increased rate of histamine directional release, as well as an elevated expression of SELE, TNF-α, HRF, and IL-6. SELE silencing was found to decrease the number of degranulated mast cells and reduce the rate of histamine directional release, along with suppressed TNF-α, HRF, and IL-6 expression, in the serum of CIU mice. Ketotifen was observed to rescue the increased expression of TNF-α, HRF, and IL-6 caused by SELE overexpression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential of SELE downregulation to repress inflammatory factor secretion caused by the accumulation of mast cells, which ultimately inhibits the development of CIU.

Synthesis of anti-allergic drugs

Histamine is formed by the decarboxylation of histidine catalyzed by enzymes. It is an endogenous biologically active substance involved in multiple complex physiological processes as an important chemical transmitter. Histamine receptors have four subtypes, H₁, H₂, H₃ and H₄, all of which are G protein coupling receptors (GPCRs) with different physiological functions. Histamine plays an important role in the pathophysiological mechanism of allergic diseases, and the antagonistic effect of histamine has become an important way to study anti-allergic drugs, wherein the anti-allergic drugs used in clinical practice are mainly H₁ receptor antagonists. Currently, there are many varieties of H₁ receptor antagonists in clinical applications, which can be divided into ethylenediamine antagonists, amino ether antagonists, propylamine antagonists, tricyclic antagonists, piperazine antagonists and piperidine antagonists depending on their chemical structures. This article mainly reviews the research progress of allergic reactions with histamine H₁ receptor antagonists and expounds the important aspects of the design and synthesis of various new compounds.

Histamine is formed by the decarboxylation of histidine catalyzed by enzymes. It is an endogenous biologically active substance involved in multiple complex physiological processes as an important chemical transmitter.

Response of ADA and Its Isoenzymes in Mice Infected by Trichinella Spiralis and Treated with Mimosine

Infections caused by the nematode Trichinella spiralis (T. spiralis) are chatacterized by an inflammatory response in the host. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate markers for monitoring mice infected with T. spiralis and treated with or without mimosine. The markers that have been used were total and differential white blood cell counts, subpopulations of lymphocytes, serum tADA and its isoenzymes ADA1 and ADA2 activity. The study included 3 groups of BALB/c mice. Group A consisted of 16 healthy mice, Group B of 16 mice infected with T. spiralis and treated with saline, and Group C of 16 mice infected with T. spiralis and treated with mimosine. The measurements were made once per week for the first six weeks continuously following the infection. According to our results, leukocytosis, lymphocytosis and increased percentages of adhesion molecules and CD4 lymphocytes were present in groups B and C one week post-infection. Total ADA activity as well as ADA1 and ADA2 was higher in groups B and C versus group A from the first week post-infection. The levels of tADA activity, ADA1 and ADA2 were higher in group B compared to those of group C and the difference was statisticaly sigificant (p<0.05) during the 4th week post-infection. The majority of tADA activity, essential for an efficient immune response, was derived from ADA1 which may have been produced by infected tissues. The elevated activities of tADA and ADA1 may be sensitive markers for infection of T. spiralis and for monitoring the course of the infection.

Association of Cyclosporine and 311 nM UVB in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Forms of Psoriasis: A New Strategic Approach

Psoriasis is a T-lymphocyte mediated autoimmune disease. The response to therapies targeting T-lymphocytes suggest that the latter is a key cell in the pathogenesis of the disease. Cyclosporine (CsA) inhibits the proliferation and the IL-2 dependent expansion of T-lymphocytes. Ultraviolet radiation is an effective treatment for psoriasis. Several studies have demonstrated a significant improvement of the therapeutic response when narrow-band radiation is issued by TL-01 fluorescent lamp compared to broadband UVB issued by other fluorescent sources. The effects of UVB on the immune system appear to be limited to the cell-mediated compartment of the immune response. In order to reduce the cumulative dose of UVB and limit the toxicity of drugs in the therapy of psoriasis, phototherapy with UVB has been used as treatment in association with other standard therapies. The purpose of the study is to evaluate, in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis a combined therapy with Cyclosporine A and 311 nm UVB phototherapy.

H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterised by the development of crops of red, itchy, raised weals or hives with no identifiable external cause.Objectives To assess the effects of H1-antihistamines for CSU.Search methods We searched the following databases up to June 2014: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE(from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974) and PsycINFO (from 1806). We searched five trials registers and checked articles for references to relevant randomised controlled trials.Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials of H1-antihistamines for CSU. Interventions included single therapy or a combination of H1-antihistamines compared with no treatment (placebo) or another active pharmacological compound at any dose.Data collection and analysis We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.Our primary outcome measures were proportion of participants with complete suppression of urticaria: 'good or excellent' response,50% or greater improvement in quality of life measures, and adverse events.We present risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals(CIs). Main results We identified 73 studies (9759 participants); 34 studies provided data for 23 comparisons. The duration of the intervention was up to two weeks (short-term) or longer than two weeks and up to three months (intermediate-term).Cetirizine 10mg once daily in the short term and in the intermediate term led to complete suppression of urticaria by more participants than was seen with placebo (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.51 to 4.91). For this same outcome, comparison of desloratadine versus placebo in the intermediate term (5 mg) (RR 37.00, 95% CI 2.31 to 593.70) and in the short term (20 mg) (RR 15.97, 95% CI 1.04 to 245.04)favoured desloratadine, but no differences were seen between 5 mg and 10 mg for short-term treatment.Levocetirizine 20 mg per day (short-term) was more effective for complete suppression of urticaria compared with placebo (RR 20.87,95% CI 1.37 to 317.60), and at 5 mg was effective in the intermediate term (RR 52.88, 95% CI 3.31 to 843.81) but not in the shortterm, nor was 10 mg effective in the short term.Rupatadine at 10 mg and 20 mg in the intermediate term achieved a 'good or excellent response' compared with placebo (RR 1.35,95% CI 1.03 to 1.77).Loratadine (10 mg) versus placebo (RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.79) and loratadine (10 mg) versus cetirizine (10 mg) (RR 1.05, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.43) over short-term and intermediate-term treatment showed no significant difference for 'good or excellent response' or for complete suppression of urticaria, respectively.Loratadine (10 mg) versus desloratadine (5 mg) (intermediate-term) showed no statistically significant difference for complete suppression of urticaria (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06) or for 'good or excellent response' (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.71). For loratadine(10 mg) versus mizolastine (10 mg) (intermediate-term), no statistically significant difference was seen for complete suppression of urticaria (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.16) or for 'good or excellent response' (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.42).Loratadine (10mg) versus emedastine (2mg) (intermediate-term) showed no statistically significant difference for complete suppression(RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.39) or for 'good or excellent response' (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.24); the quality of the evidence was moderate for this comparison.No difference in short-term treatment was noted between loratadine (10mg) and hydroxyzine (25mg) in terms of complete suppression(RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.10).When desloratadine (5 to 20 mg) was compared with levocetirizine (5 to 20 mg), levocetirizine appeared to be the more effective (P value < 0.02).In a comparison of fexofenadine versus cetirizine, more participants in the cetirizine group showed complete suppression of urticaria(P value < 0.001).Adverse events leading to withdrawals were not significantly different in the following comparisons: cetirizine versus placebo at 10 mg and 20 mg (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.68 to 13.22); desloratadine 5 mg versus placebo (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.42 to 5.10); loratadine 10 mg versus mizolastine 10 mg (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.60); loratadine 10mg versus emedastine 2mg (RR 1.09, 95%CI 0.07 to 17.14);cetirizine 10 mg versus hydroxyzine 25 mg (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.45); and hydroxyzine 25 mg versus placebo (RR 3.64, 95%CI 0.77 to 17.23), all intermediate term.No difference was seen between loratadine 10 mg versus mizolastine 10 mg in the proportion of participants with at least 50%improvement in quality of life (RR 3.21, 95% CI 0.32 to 32.33).Authors' conclusions Although the results of our review indicate that at standard doses of treatment, several antihistamines are effective when compared with placebo, all results were gathered from a few studies or, in some cases, from single-study estimates. The quality of the evidence was affected by the small number of studies in each comparison and the small sample size for many of the outcomes, prompting us to downgrade the quality of evidence for imprecision (unless stated for each comparison, the quality of the evidence was low).No single H1-antihistamine stands out as most effective. Cetirizine at 10 mg once daily in the short term and in the intermediate term was found to be effective in completely suppressing urticaria. Evidence is limited for desloratadine given at 5 mg once daily in the intermediate term and at 20 mg in the short term. Levocetirizine at 5 mg in the intermediate but not short term was effective for complete suppression. Levocetirizine 20 mg was effective in the short term, but 10 mg was not. No difference in rates of withdrawal due to adverse events was noted between active and placebo groups. Evidence for improvement in quality of life was insufficient.

Effects of fexofenadine hydrochloride in a guinea pig model of antigen-induced rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa, induced by histamine, leukotrienes, and other substances released from mast cells. Fexofenadine hydrochloride, the active metabolite of terfenadine, is a novel, nonsedating antiallergic drug having H1 receptor antagonistic activity. Fexofenadine is effective for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, its mechanism of action in attenuating nasal congestion has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, we first examined the effects of fexofenadine on a guinea pig model of antigen-induced rhinitis. We also evaluated the effects of mepyramine, zafirlukast and ramatroban in this model; these drugs are an H1 receptor antagonist, a selective leukotriene antagonist and a selective thromboxane antagonist, respectively. Rhinitis was induced by ovalbumin (OVA) instillation into the nasal cavity of animals that had been sensitized by two earlier OVA injections (s.c. and i.p.). The nasal airway resistance was measured for 45 min after the challenge. Fexofenadine hydrochloride (20 mg/kg) and terfenadine (20 mg/kg) administered orally 70 min prior to the challenge significantly inhibited (fexofenadine, p < 0.001, terfenadine, p < 0.05) the increase in nasal airway resistance. Ramatroban (30 mg/kg) administered orally 60 min prior to the challenge also significantly inhibited (p < 0.05) the increase in nasal airway resistance. In contrast, mepyramine (3 mg/kg i.v.) and zafirlukast (3 mg/kg p.o.) failed to reduce the increase in nasal airway resistance. These results suggest that thromboxane may be involved in the increase in the nasal airway resistance in this model. Accordingly, fexofenadine may reduce the increase in nasal airway resistance by inhibiting the release of chemical mediators, including thromboxane, that are involved in the increase in nasal airway resistance in this model.

Second-Generation Antihistamines

Antihistamines are useful medications for the treatment of a variety of allergic disorders. Second-generation antihistamines avidly and selectively bind to peripheral histamine H1 receptors and, consequently, provide gratifying relief of histamine-mediated symptoms in a majority of atopic patients. This tight receptor specificity additionally leads to few effects on other neuronal or hormonal systems, with the result that adverse effects associated with these medications, with the exception of noticeable sedation in about 10% of cetirizine-treated patients, resemble those of placebo overall. Similarly, serious adverse drug reactions and interactions are uncommon with these medicines. Therapeutic interchange to one of the available second-generation antihistamines is a reasonable approach to limiting an institutional formulary, and adoption of such a policy has proven capable of creating substantial cost savings. Differences in overall efficacy and safety between available second-generation antihistamines, when administered in equivalent dosages, are not large. However, among the antihistamines presently available, fexofenadine may offer the best overall balance of effectiveness and safety, and this agent is an appropriate selection for initial or switch therapy for most patients with mild or moderate allergic symptoms. Cetirizine is the most potent antihistamine available and has been subjected to more clinical study than any other. This agent is appropriate for patients proven unresponsive to other antihistamines and for those with the most severe symptoms who might benefit from antihistamine treatment of the highest potency that can be dose-titrated up to maximal intensity.