1
|
Castellani M, Felaco P, Pandolfp F, Salini V, De Amicis D, Vecchiet J, Tetè S, Ciampoli C, Conti F, Cerulli G, Caraffa A, Antinolfi P, Cuccurullo C, Perrella A, Theoharides T, De Lutiis M, Kempuraj D, Shaik Y. Inflammatory Compounds: Neuropeptide Substance Pand Cytokines. EUR J INFLAMM 2017. [DOI: 10.1177/1721727x0900700202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory diseases represent one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality throughout the world and they affect the functions of several tissues. The pathophysiology of these diseases involves release of many pro-inflammatory mediators such as cytokines/chemokines, histamine, C3a, C5a (complement components), bradykinin, leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, LTE4), PAF, and substance P, in addition to anti-inflammatory molecules. Recently, it has been demonstrated that neuroimmune interactions are important in the initiation and progress of inflammatory processes. Substance P is an 11-amino acid neuropeptide that is released from nerve endings in many tissues. It acts via membrane-bound NK1 receptors (NK1R). Inflammatory and neuropeptides such as substance P stimulate the release of chemokines, in particular IL-8, a potent neutrophil chemoattractant. Expression of IL-8 is regulated mainly by the transcription factors NF-kappaB, activating protein-1. Substance P plays an important role in immunological and inflammatory states, and it is a mediator of tissue injury, asthma, arthritis, allergy and autoimmune diseases. In this article, our studies revisited the interrelationship between these two powerful inflammatory compounds: substance P and cytokines. These observations suggest that these inflammatory molecules may represent a potential therapeutic target to treat several inflammatory states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M.L. Castellani
- Immunology Division, Medical School, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - P. Felaco
- Division of Nephrology, University of Chieti, Italy
| | - F. Pandolfp
- Immunology Division, Medical School, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - V. Salini
- Department of Human Dynamic, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - D. De Amicis
- Department of Human Dynamic, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - J. Vecchiet
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Medical School, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - S. Tetè
- Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - C. Ciampoli
- Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - F. Conti
- Gynecology Division, University of Chieti, Italy
| | - G. Cerulli
- Orthopeadic Division, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - A. Caraffa
- Orthopeadic Division, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - P. Antinolfi
- Orthopeadic Division, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - C. Cuccurullo
- Division of Medical Pathology, University of Chieti, Italy
| | - A. Perrella
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - T.C. Theoharides
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Biochemistry and Internal Medicine Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M.A. De Lutiis
- Department of Biology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - D. Kempuraj
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Biochemistry and Internal Medicine Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Y.B. Shaik
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campo P, Rondón C, Gould HJ, Barrionuevo E, Gevaert P, Blanca M. Local IgE in non-allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2016; 45:872-881. [PMID: 25495772 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is characterized by the presence of a nasal Th2 inflammatory response with local production of specific IgE antibodies and a positive response to a nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) without evidence of systemic atopy. The prevalence has been shown to be up to 25% in subjects affected with rhinitis with persistence, comorbidity and evolution similar to allergic rhinitis. LAR is a consistent entity that does not evolve to allergic rhinitis with systemic atopy over time although patients have significant impairment in quality of life and increase in the severity of nasal symptoms over time. Lower airways can be also involved. The diagnosis of LAR is based mostly on demonstration of positive response to NAPT and/or local synthesis of specific IgE. Allergens involved include seasonal or perennial such as house dusts mites, pollens, animal epithelia, moulds (alternaria) and others. Basophils from peripheral blood may be activated by the involved allergens suggesting the spill over of locally synthesized specific IgE to the circulation. LAR patients will benefit from the same treatment as allergic patients using antihistamines, inhaled corticosteroids and IgE antagonists. Studies on immunotherapy are ongoing and will determine its efficacy in LAR in terms of symptoms improvement and evolution of the natural course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Campo
- Allergy Unit, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, IBIMA, UMA, Malaga, Spain
| | - C Rondón
- Allergy Unit, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, IBIMA, UMA, Malaga, Spain
| | - H J Gould
- Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London, MRC-Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - E Barrionuevo
- Allergy Unit, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, IBIMA, UMA, Malaga, Spain
| | - P Gevaert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Blanca
- Allergy Unit, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, IBIMA, UMA, Malaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bernardini R, Catania P, Caffarelli C, Cardinale F, Franceschini F, Pelosi U, Peroni D. Perioperative Latex Allergy. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2011; 24:S55-60. [DOI: 10.1177/03946320110240s308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of latex allergy varies greatly depending on the population studied and the methods used to detect sensitization. Subjects considered to be at high risk for latex allergy are rubber industry workers, children with spina bifida and urological abnormalities, children undergoing multiple surgical procedures and with urinary catheterization, health care workers and people with food allergy (latex fruit syndrome). In this paper we report a review of latex proteins, the symptoms of latex allergy, diagnosis and management in subjects with latex allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Bernardini
- Pediatric Unit, “San Giuseppe” Hospital, Empoli, Florence, Italy
| | - P. Catania
- Pediatric Unit, “San Giuseppe” Hospital, Empoli, Florence, Italy
| | - C. Caffarelli
- Pediatric Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - F. Cardinale
- Department of Allergy and Pulmonology, Pediatric Hospital “Giovanni XXIII”, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - F. Franceschini
- Pediatric Unit, “Ospedali Riuniti”, University Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - U. Pelosi
- Children and Mother Care Department, Pediatrics Unit, “Santa Barbara” Hospital, Iglesias, Italy
| | - D.G. Peroni
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nucera E, Pollastrini E, Sabato V, Colagiovanni A, Aruanno A, Rizzi A, Buonomo A, Pecora V, Lombardo C, Astorri AL, Rossi G, Patriarca G, Schiavino D. Challenge tests in the diagnosis of latex allergy. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2010; 23:543-52. [PMID: 20646349 DOI: 10.1177/039463201002300216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and safety of challenge tests and their usefulness in the diagnosis of latex allergy. Forty adult subjects (F/M = 34/6, aged 18-66 yrs) with a history of adverse reactions after latex exposure and positive prick test and/or specific IgE to latex were enrolled. They were compared with 20 control subjects. They underwent provocative (cutaneous, mucous-oral, sublingual, conjunctival, nasal, bronchial, vaginal) tests. Symptoms and drug scores were recorded for each patient during challenges. All patients reacted to at least one of the following: cutaneous, nasal and conjunctival tests. No systemic reactions requiring epinephrine occurred. Of the challenges, the vaginal test resulted as the safest, but it had low sensitivity and many limits related to the procedure. According to our data, bronchial and nasal tests had the highest sensitivity (76% and 82% respectively), and were more precise than other tests in determining latex exposure and symptoms, but the bronchial test also presented the highest rate of risk. Mucous and cutaneous tests resulted as the most reliable. For all the tests, specificity and positive predictive value were 100%. All control subjects resulted negative to all challenges. There were no statistically significant changes in skin and serologic tests between the first and second visits. Correlations between MIS and skin tests and between MIS and serum tests were not found. Challenges can be considered safe diagnostic procedures. Tests that most faithfully reproduce natural exposure, on the basis of a patient's history, are preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Nucera
- Allergy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|