HPV E6/E7 mRNA test for the detection of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+): a systematic review

Background

Genital infection with certain types of Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major cause of cervical cancer globally. For early detection of premalignant dysplasia, evidences are coming out on the usefulness of HPV E6/E7 mRNA test as a potential tool compared with cytology and HPV DNA testing. Taking into account shortage of compiled data on this field, the aim of this systematic review was to describe the latest diagnostic performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing to detect high grade cervical lesions (CIN2+) where by histology was taken as a gold standard.

Methods

Articles published in English were systematically searched using key words from PubMed/Medline and SCOPUS. In addition, Google Scholar and the Google database were searched manually for grey literature. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted the data. We performed a descriptive presentation of the performance of E6/E7 mRNA test (in terms of sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) for the detection of CIN2 + .

Results

Out of 231 applicable citations, we have included 29 articles that included a total of 23,576 study participants (age range, 15–84 years) who had different cervical pathologies. Among the participants who had cervical histology, the proportion of CIN2+ was between 10.6 and 90.6%. Using histology as a gold standard, 11 studies evaluated the PreTect HPV Proofer, 7 studies evaluated the APTIMA HPV assay (Gen-Probe) and 6 studies evaluated the Quantivirus® HPV assay. The diagnostic performance of these three most common mRNA testing tools to detect CIN2+ was; 1) PreTect Proofer; median sensitivity 83%, specificity 73%, PPV 70 and NPV 88.9%. 2) APTIMA assay; median sensitivity 91.4%, specificity 46.2%, PPV 34.3% and NPV 96.3%. 3) Quantivirus®: median sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 54.6%, PPV 54.3% and NPV was at 89.3%. Further, the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AU-ROC) curve varied between 63.8 and 90.9%.

Conclusions

The reported diagnostic accuracy implies that HPV mRNA based tests possess diagnostic relevance to detect CIN2+ and could potentially be considered in areas where there is no histology facility. Further studies including its cost should be considered.

Prospective evaluation of E6/E7 mRNA detection by the NucliSENS Easy Q HPV assay in a stepwise protocol

The objective of the study was to evaluate prospectively the added value of E6/E7 mRNA detection in a stepwise protocol. A total of 1,422 samples were collected over a period of 17 months. The samples were referred for human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping if they showed cytological evidence of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, low- or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. If one or more of HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, or 45 were present, mRNA was analyzed by the NucliSENS EasyQ HPV assay. The genotypical distribution of high-risk HPV was very heterogeneous; HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 represented 20.2%, 3.4%, 10.8%, 3.4%, and 3.8% of HPV-positive samples, respectively. Follow-up data were available for 35 patients. Although over the half (51.4%) of follow-up samples showing HPV DNA/mRNA consensus evolved to cervical intraepithelial neoplastic lesions, 25.7% showed no progression to neoplasia despite mRNA positivity. However, the major concern was the group (14.3%) that showed progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia despite mRNA negativity: all but one of these cases had a high-risk HPV genotype other than the five included in the NucliSENS EasyQ HPV assay. Markedly, 66.7% of the discordant samples between colposcopy and histology that underestimated the degree of cervical dysplasia were found in this group. Close monitoring of high-risk HPV DNA-positive/mRNA-negative cases remains necessary, which leads to questions about the added value of the evaluated protocol.

Implementing specificity of HPV-DNA primary screening in a successful organised cervical cancer prevention programme

OBJECTIVE

This two-arm longitudinal study was performed within a regional organized cervical-cancer-prevention program in which HPV-DNA test is used in primary screening. The aim was to analyze the diagnostic performances of p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual-test and E6/E7-mRNA test in identifying CIN2+ lesion among HPV-DNA positive (HPV-DNAve) women triaged for LSIL-or-worse liquid based cytology (LBC).

METHODS

Thirty-six thousand thirty-one women participated to HPV-DNA screening program pilot study. Three thousand six hundred forty-one resulted HPV-DNAve; among these, 43% were LSIL-or-worse (LSIL+). HPV-DNAve/LSIL+ patients were submitted to colposcopy and histological assessment of any visible lesions. Dual-test was performed on 794 residual LBC specimens. In 405 cases, dual-test result was related to histology, considering CIN2+ as endpoint. mRNA test has been carried out retrospectively, on a subset of 173 residual LBC specimens.

RESULTS

Agreement between dual-test and histological diagnosis was 59%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of cytology-plus-dual-test approach were 62.3%, 76.8%, 63.1% and 84.2%, respectively. Dual-test improved specificity, PPV and NPV of cytological triage Agreement between mRNA testing and histology was 65%. Cytology-plus mRNA testing showing sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV reaching 32.1%, 94.9%, 75% and 50%, respectively; implemented specificity and PPV of cytology alone in triaging DNA-ve/LSIL+ patients (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We provided promising data indicating the important role that p16(INK4)/Ki-67 dual-test, and mostly E6/E7 mRNA test, might have in triaging HPV-DNAve. These approaches would exclude the occurrence of cervical cancer and would avoid overtreatment, at the same time. Further longitudinal analysis has to be considered.