Treatment effects in prostate cancer following traditional and emerging therapies

Reprint of: morphologic spectrum of treatment-related changes in prostate tissue and prostate cancer: an updated review

A wide range of treatment options are available to patients with prostate cancer. Some treatments are standard (currently used) while some are emerging therapies. Androgen deprivation therapy is typically reserved for localized or metastatic prostate cancer not amenable to surgery. Radiation therapy may be offered to individuals for local therapy with curative intent in low- or intermediate-risk disease that may have a high probability of progression on active surveillance or where surgery is not suitable. Focal therapy/ablation treatment is an alternative approach for those who prefer to avoid radical prostatectomy for localized disease of low- or intermediate-risk or as salvage therapy after failed radiation therapy. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy remain under investigation and are currently used for androgen-independent disease or hormone-refractory prostate cancer; however, a better understanding of therapeutic efficacy is needed. Histopathologic changes observed in benign and malignant prostate tissue induced by hormonal therapies and radiation therapy are well described, whereas treatment-related effects secondary to novel therapies continue to be documented although their clinical significance is not absolutely clear. An informed and accurate evaluation of post-treatment prostate specimens requires pathologists with diagnostic acumen and knowledge relating to the histopathologic spectrum associated with each treatment option. In situations when clinical history is lacking, but morphologic features are suggestive of prior treatment, pathologists are encouraged to consult clinical colleagues regarding prior treatment history including details of when treatment was initiated and duration of therapy. This review aims to provide a concise update of current and emerging therapies for prostate cancer, histologic alterations and recommendations on Gleason grading.

Morphologic spectrum of treatment-related changes in prostate tissue and prostate cancer: An Updated Review

A wide range of treatment options is available to patients with prostate cancer. Some treatments are standard (currently used) while some are emerging therapies. Androgen deprivation therapy is typically reserved for localized or metastatic prostate cancer not amenable to surgery. Radiation therapy may be offered to individuals for local therapy with curative intent in low- or intermediate-risk disease that may have a high probability of progression on active surveillance or where surgery is not suitable. Focal therapy/ablation treatment is an alternative approach for those who prefer to avoid radical prostatectomy for localized disease of low- or intermediate-risk or as salvage therapy following failed radiation therapy. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy remain under investigation and are currently used for androgen-independent disease or hormone-refractory prostate cancer; however a better understand therapeutic efficacy is needed. Histopathologic changes observed in benign and malignant prostate tissue induced by hormonal therapies and radiation therapy is well described, while treatment-related effects secondary to novel therapies continue to be documented although their clinical significance is not absolutely clear. An informed and accurate evaluation of post-treatment prostate specimens requires pathologists with diagnostic acumen and knowledge relating to the histopathologic spectrum associated with each treatment option. In situations when clinical history is lacking, but morphologic features are suggestive of prior treatment, pathologists are encouraged to consult clinical colleagues regarding prior treatment history including details of when treatment was initiated and duration of therapy. This review aims to provide a concise update of current and emerging therapies for prostate cancer, histologic alterations and recommendations on Gleason grading.

Methionine Restriction and Cancer Biology

The essential amino acid, methionine, is important for cancer cell growth and metabolism. A growing body of evidence indicates that methionine restriction inhibits cancer cell growth and may enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. This review summarizes the efficacy and mechanism of action of methionine restriction on hallmarks of cancer in vitro and in vivo. The review highlights the role of glutathione formation, polyamine synthesis, and methyl group donation as mediators of the effects of methionine restriction on cancer biology. The translational potential of the use of methionine restriction as a personalized nutritional approach for the treatment of patients with cancer is also discussed.

Treatment effects in prostate cancer

Nonsurgical treatments for prostate cancer include androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), radiation therapy (RT), ablative therapies, chemotherapy, and newly emerging immunotherapies. These approaches can be used alone or in combination depending on the clinical scenario. ADT is typically reserved for high-risk locally or systemically advanced disease that is not amenable to curative surgery. Radiation therapy can be used instead of surgery as primary therapy with curative intent for low-intermediate-risk disease as well as for control of locally advanced disease not suitable for surgery. Ablative therapies can be used as primary therapy for low-intermediate-risk disease or as salvage therapy for clinically localized disease where RT has failed. Chemotherapy and immune-based therapies are currently used for androgen-independent disease, although the indications for these approaches may well change as new data from clinical trials accrue. Pathologists should be able to recognize tissue changes associated with these treatments to provide information that will optimize patient management. This is particularly true in situations where clinical history of recent or remote nonsurgical treatment is not provided with the specimen. In the absence of this information, pathologists encountering the features described herein are encouraged to review patient records or communicate directly with clinical colleagues to determine how a given patient was treated and when.