Atypical antipsychotic use in treating adolescents and young adults with developmental disabilities

Olanzapine-Induced Withdrawal Oculogyric Crisis in an Adolescent With a Neurodevelopmental Disorder

This case report describes an adolescent female with a complex psychiatric history and Fragile X syndrome who developed an antipsychotic-withdrawal emergent oculogyric crisis (OGC) in approximately 12 hours following reduction in olanzapine dose from 20 mg total daily dose to 5 mg twice daily. The team concluded that the OGC was likely related to olanzapine withdrawal based on the following clinical factors: 1) prior treatment with olanzapine 20 mg for 4 to 5 days/week for several months, without such reaction; 2) proximity of the OGC to the olanzapine dose reduction (within 12 hours); and 3) lack of recurrence with olanzapine dose increase. Additionally, her neurodevelopmental disorder and age were identified as risk factors for an acute dystonic reaction. Published case reports describe withdrawal emergent dystonia, including OGC, following abrupt discontinuation of clozapine in adults. Given structural similarities of clozapine and olanzapine it can be postulated that this phenomenon is based in muscarinic receptor function—specifically, super-sensitized muscarinic receptors may react to excessive acetylcholine upon antipsychotic discontinuation, resulting in muscle motor end plate hyperactivity. Providers caring for pediatric patients with neurodevelopmental disorders should carefully consider risks for withdrawal emergent dystonia, obtain clear medication histories, and consider slow, conservative tapers when discontinuing antipsychotics.

Harms of Antipsychotics in Children and Young Adults: A Systematic Review Update

OBJECTIVE

To update and extend our previous systematic review on first- (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for treatment of psychiatric and behavioral conditions in children, adolescents, and young adults (aged ≤24 years). This article focuses on the evidence for harms.

METHOD

We searched (to April 2016) 8 databases, gray literature, trial registries, Food and Drug Administration reports, and reference lists. Two reviewers conducted study screening and selection independently, with consensus for selection. One reviewer extracted and another verified all data; 2 reviewers independently assessed risk of bias. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate and network meta-analysis across conditions for changes in body composition. Two reviewers reached consensus for ratings on the strength of evidence for prespecified outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 135 studies (95 trials and 40 observational) were included, and 126 reported on harms. FGAs caused slightly less weight gain and more extrapyramidal symptoms than SGAs. SGAs as a class caused adverse effects, including weight gain, high triglyceride levels, extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, and somnolence. They appeared to increase the risk for high cholesterol levels and type 2 diabetes. Many outcomes for individual drug comparisons were of low or insufficient strength of evidence. Olanzapine caused more short-term gains in weight and body mass index than several other SGAs. The dose of SGAs may not make a difference over the short term for some outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians need to weigh carefully the benefit-to-harm ratio when using antipsychotics, especially when treatment alternatives exist. More evidence is needed on the comparative harms between antipsychotics over the longer term.

Health-related quality of life in people with intellectual disability who use long-term antipsychotic drugs for challenging behaviour

BACKGROUND

Many people with intellectual disabilities use long-term antipsychotics for challenging behaviour and experience side-effects from these drugs, which may affect Health-related Quality of Life (HQoL).

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate HQoL in people with intellectual disabilities who use long-term antipsychotics and to investigate its associations with challenging behaviour and physical symptoms often associated with antipsychotics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used baseline data of two studies of long-term used antipsychotics. The RAND-36 and the emotional and physical wellbeing subscales of the Personal Outcome Scale (POS) were used to assess HQoL. Associations with challenging behaviour, measured with the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) and physical symptoms (extrapyramidal, autonomic, metabolic) with HQoL outcomes were analysed by univariate and multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

The mental subscales of the RAND-36 and emotional wellbeing of the POS were associated with the irritability and lethargy ABC-subscales. Physical wellbeing was negatively associated with parkinsonism urinary problems, dysphagia and temperature dysregulation possibly due to antipsychotics use.

CONCLUSION

Both mental and physical wellbeing are related to challenging behaviour and physical symptoms associated with antipsychotics. Therefore HQoL could be a helpful measure when balancing benefits and disadvantages of antipsychotics prescribed for challenging behaviour.

Adverse events and the relation with quality of life in adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour using psychotropic drugs

BACKGROUND

Psychotropic drugs are prescribed to approximately 30-40% of adults with intellectual disability (ID) and challenging behaviour, despite the limited evidence of effectiveness and the potential of adverse events.

AIMS

To assess the prevalence of adverse events in association with psychotropic drug use in adults with ID and challenging behaviour and to examine the relation of these adverse events with the person's quality of life.

METHOD

The presence of adverse events was measured with a questionnaire that had to be filled in by the physicians of the participants. Movement disorders were measured separately with a standardised protocol. The strength of the association between adverse events and Intellectual Disability Quality of Life-16 (IDQOL-16), and daily functioning was investigated using linear regression analyses, taking into account the severity of disease (CGI-S) as potential confounder.

RESULTS

Virtually all of 103 adults with ID and challenging behaviour had at least one adverse event (84.4%) and almost half had ≥3 adverse events (45.6%) across different subclasses. Using psychotropic drugs increased the prevalence of adverse events significantly. Respectively 13% of the patients without psychotropic drugs and 61% of the patients with ≥2 psychotropic drugs had ≥3 adverse events. Having adverse events had a significantly negative influence on the quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

A large majority of all patients had at least one adverse event associated with psychotropic drug use. More attention is needed for these adverse events and their negative influence on the quality of life of these patients, taking into account the lack of evidence of effectiveness of psychotropic drugs for challenging behaviour.

Clozapine for psychotic disorders in adults with intellectual disabilities

BACKGROUND

Psychosis is three times more common in people with an intellectual disability than in those without an intellectual disability. A low intelligence quotient (IQ) is a defining characteristic for intellectual disability and a risk factor for poor outcome in psychosis. Clozapine is recommended for treatment-resistant psychosis. The effect of psychotropic medication can be different in people with intellectual disability; for example, they may be more prone to side effects. People with an intellectual disability and psychosis form a special subgroup and we wanted to examine if there is randomised controlled trial (RCT) data in this population to support the use of clozapine.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of clozapine for treating adults with a dual diagnosis of intellectual disability and psychosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and eight other databases up to December 2014. We also searched two trials registers, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials, and contacted the manufacturers of clozapine.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that assessed the effects of clozapine, at any dose, for treating adults (aged 18 years and over) with a dual diagnosis of intellectual disability and psychotic disorder, compared with placebo or another antipsychotic medication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently screened all titles, abstracts and any relevant full-text reports against the inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 1224 titles and abstracts screened, we shortlisted 38 full-text articles, which we subsequently excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. These studies were not RCTs. Consequently, no studies are included in this Cochrane review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are currently no RCTs that assess the efficacy and side effects of clozapine in people with intellectual disabilities and psychoses. Given the use of clozapine in this vulnerable population, there is an urgent need for a RCT of clozapine in people with a dual diagnosis of intellectual disability and psychosis to fill the evidence gap.

Cognitive-adaptive disabilities

Cognitive-adaptive disabilities (CADs) are not frequently seen in the general pediatric setting. Yet, given the high rates of comorbidity in that population, they commonly demand a lot of time and effort on the part of clinicians. One aspect of comorbidity is the degree to which psychiatric disorders occur in children, adolescents, and young adults with CADs. This article reviews the epidemiology, associated psychopathology, and pharmacologic treatment of selected CADs.

Electroconvulsive therapy in a man with autism experiencing severe depression, catatonia, and self-injury

We report the successful use of electroconvulsive therapy in a 19-year-old man with autism and mild mental retardation who developed severe depression with repeated suicide attempts, multiple symptoms of catatonia, and life-threatening repetitive self-injurious behaviors. After 3 years of failed psychotropic and behavioral interventions in inpatient settings, the patient demonstrated excellent remission of symptoms with bilateral electroconvulsive therapy.

Practical guidelines for the use of new generation antipsychotic drugs (except clozapine) in adult individuals with intellectual disabilities

New generation antipsychotic (NGA) drugs introduced to the US market after clozapine (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) are frequently used in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, there is very limited research to fully establish evidence-based or personalized medicine approaches for their use in this population. These guidelines take a pragmatic approach to establishing frameworks for their use by utilizing the prescribing information and reviewing the available literature on other relevant neuropsychiatric disorders. In the absence of expert consensus guidance and well-controlled comparison trials, we present a set of guidelines to inform initiation, dosing and monitoring of use in adults. Further, in these guidelines we provide practical information on drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions, and a brief review of discontinuation syndromes, potential for abuse, use during pregnancy and cost considerations. We also provide drug utilization review forms for each NGA to facilitate implementation of these guidelines, these guidelines provide a practical and necessary resource for practitioners treating psychiatric disorders and challenging behaviors in adult individuals with ID.

Atypical antipsychotic medication improves aggression, but not self-injurious behaviour, in adults with intellectual disabilities

OBJECTIVE

Atypical antipsychotic medications have largely supplanted their typical counterparts, both for psychosis and for the treatment of aggression and/or self-injurious behaviour (SIB), in persons with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, with the exception of risperidone, little systematic research supports their use in such persons.

METHOD

A retrospective review of 31 adult residents of a state developmental centre, who were treated for aggression and/or SIB with atypical antipsychotics. Average monthly counts of aggression and SIB for 1 year of treatment with typical antipsychotics, were compared with monthly averages for the next 12 months of treatment with atypical antipsychotics.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of 31 subjects (87%) completed a full year of atypical antipsychotic treatment. Subjects ranged in age from 24 to 54 years (mean = 39); 18/31 (58%) had profound ID. Twelve of 26 (46%) had typical antipsychotics discontinued within the year of atypical treatment; another 7/26 (27%) had their typical antipsychotic dose decreased. Twenty-three of 31 trials involved risperidone; 7/31 olanzapine; 1/31 quetiapine. Subjects gained an average of 6.6 pounds during the year of atypical treatment, but no significant changes in glucose or cholesterol were found. Subjects with aggression alone (N = 14) had significant decreases in the number of aggressive acts per month during the year of atypical treatment (P = 0.03); those with both aggression and self-injury (N = 12), or those with self-injury alone (N = 5) had no significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that atypical antipsychotics can be successfully substituted for typical agents in individuals with ID and decrease the frequency of aggression over one year of treatment. The weight gain seen in our sample reinforces the necessity of regular monitoring of weight and metabolic changes in persons with ID treated with atypical antipsychotics.

Practitioner review: Psychopharmacology in children and adolescents with mental retardation

BACKGROUND

The use of psychotropic medication to treat children and adults with mental retardation (MR) has a long and extensive history. There are no identified medications to address specific cognitive deficits among persons with MR. Instead, psychotropic medications are used to treat specific behavioral symptoms and/or psychiatric syndromes. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the recent literature regarding the use of psychotropic medications in this population, focusing primarily on children and adolescents.

METHODS

The paper is divided into five general drug categories: psychostimulants, antipsychotics, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and other drugs. Each section offers an overview of the research supporting the use of that class of medications in children and adolescents with MR as well as cautions regarding potential side effects. Finally, specific clinical recommendations are offered.

RESULTS

The majority of studies in MR tend to be open trials, case reports, or controlled studies with small samples. The available data suggests that persons with MR respond to various psychotropic medications in ways similar to the typically developing population. However, rates of response tend to be poorer and the occurrence of side effects tends to be more frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of psychotropic medications in children and adolescents with MR requires even greater monitoring and the use of lower doses and slower dosage increases than in the general population.

Open-label, prospective trial of olanzapine in adolescents with subaverage intelligence and disruptive behavioral disorders

OBJECTIVE

Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, has been shown to be efficacious for treatment of psychotic and mood disorders in adults. This prospective, open-label study was conducted to examine the safety and usefulness of olanzapine in treating disruptive behavior disorders in adolescents with subaverage intelligence.

METHOD

Sixteen adolescents (ages 13-17 years) with borderline to moderate mental retardation and disruptive behavior were enrolled in an 8-week olanzapine trial (5-20 mg/day). Dependent measures included the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Conners Parent Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions, and two side effects scales.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvement (p <.002) was found on the Irritability and Hyperactivity subscales of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist and the Conners Parent Rating Scale Hyperactivity Index. No subjects developed extrapyramidal side effects. However, four were terminated prematurely from the trial because of either worsening of symptoms (requiring psychiatric inpatient hospitalization in two subjects) or side effects. The most common side effect for the sample was weight gain (averaging 12.7 lb), with 67% of subjects gaining > or =10 lb. Although there was also a statistically significant increase in prolactin levels, no subjects reported prolactin-related side effects (e.g., gynecomastia, galactorhea, amenorrhea).

CONCLUSION

Olanzapine may be useful in treating disruptive behavior in adolescents with subaverage intelligence. However, side effects, especially weight gain, are a significant issue. Future double-blind, placebo-controlled studies need to confirm these findings and assess long-term safety and outcome of olanzapine treatment.

Reviewing the use of antipsychotic drugs in people with intellectual disability

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotics are the most widely prescribed drugs in people with intellectual disability even if schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders do not affect more than 3% of such population. Many authors outline the lack of studies on the efficacy of antipsychotics on schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders in people with intellectual disability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The aim of the present study is to review all evidences resulting from international trials selected by Medline, and compare efficacy and side effects of different antipsychotics in people with both intellectual disability and psychotic disorders and/or behavioural disorders.

RESULTS

195 studies were identified; 117 concern traditional antipychotics while 78 new generation ones. If we consider the type of studies, it results that only the 12.8% of all production is represented by meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomised and not controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews would be the golden standard for therapeutical studies; unfortunately they are really few in this field. It is anyway significative that all the studies reported focus on the use of antipsychotics in people with intellectual disability presenting behavioural problems. To increase the validity of these studies it is recommendable to proceed only with well-designed studies, possibly double-blind versus placebo or other medications. There is need to define precise inclusion criteria, precise symptomatological or behavioural targets and adaptative ability assessment, using valid and reliable diagnostic instruments.

The Psychopharmacologic Treatment of Violent Youth

Aggressive violence has been described as the greatest problem and the most frequent reason for referrals in child and adolescent psychiatry. In this country we have only partially emerged from an epidemic of violence that was really an epidemic of youth violence. Thus it is hardly surprising that psychiatrists are being asked more and more frequently whether psychiatric medications might help to diminish the toll from this behavioral plague. Medications are useful and appropriate for only a small minority of the people who commit serious violence. Even when they are indicated, they can never be the sole treatment modality, but should be supplemented by psychological and social therapies. When the violence is a byproduct or symptom of an underlying mental illness, treating that illness is generally the most effective method of preventing future violence on a long-term basis. However, most violence is not committed by those who are mentally ill, and most of the mentally ill never commit a serious act of violence. That is why many attempts have been made to discover whether there are drugs that diminish the symptom, violence, even when there is no underlying mental illness for which drugs would normally be prescribed. In fact there are several, and their indications and use are reviewed here. Different principles govern the acute short-term emergency treatment of a violent crisis and the long-term treatment of those who are chronically and repetitively violent, and these differences are also summarized here.

The use of risperidone among individuals with mental retardation: clinically supported or not?

Since their introduction, antipsychotic medications have been used widely to treat conditions other than psychiatric disorders, especially among individuals with mental retardation. Researchers have shown that the prevalence rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions among this population are extremely high. Given the limited empirical data to support the use of psychotropic medications, specifically antipsychotics, among individuals with mental retardation, this trend is a cause for concern. This review was undertaken in an effort to summarize the available studies regarding the use of the atypical antipsychotic drug risperidone among individuals with mental retardation and provide a resource for clinicians, care givers, and parents. Based on the results of this review, the effectiveness of risperidone in targeting psychopathology and challenging behaviors for individuals with mental retardation is questionable at present.

Pharmacological management of challenging behavior of individuals with intellectual disability

In many Westernized countries, including Australia, concerns about the use of psychotropic drugs to manage the challenging behavior of individuals with intellectual disability have resulted in the development of legislative and procedural controls. Although these constraints may limit indiscriminate use, employing medication remains a common practice. This study examined information about 873 individuals (566 males, 307 females) who were the subjects of reports to the Intellectual Disability Review Panel in March 2000 concerning the use of chemical restraint. A high proportion of people with intellectual disability were reported to have received drugs for purposes of behavioral restraint. The range of drugs was extensive, although those from the antipsychotic class were the most frequently reported. Many individuals concurrently received more than one type of drug or more than one drug from the same drug class. More males than females and more older than younger individuals were administered medication. A relationship between gender and age was apparent, with younger males but older females dominating. The use of drugs to mange the behavior of people with intellectual disability may at times be warranted. However, it is important that the extent and type of drug use, as well as the characteristics of those who are medicated, be subject to ongoing scrutiny.

Olanzapine in the treatment of aggression and tics in children with Tourette's syndrome--a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of olanzapine on aggressive behaviour and tic severity in children with Tourette's Syndrome (TS).

METHOD

Ten (10) subjects (aged 7-13 years) with a primary diagnosis of TS and a history of aggressive behaviour were treated in a single-blind, 2-week placebo run-in, 8-week treatment phase trial. The starting dose of olanzapine was 1.25-2.5 mg/day and was titrated at biweekly intervals, as tolerated. The mean dosage at the end of the trial was 14.5 mg/day.

RESULTS

All 10 subjects completed the study. Olanzapine produced clinically and statistically significant reductions of aggression and tic severity from baseline to trial completion, as measured by the Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS). Weight gain during the treatment period was the most common adverse effect (range 2-20 lbs: group mean 12.0 lbs +/- 5.71). No other significant adverse effects were observed during the 10-week trial.

CONCLUSION

The results of this trial confirm clinical observations that olanzapine may be an effective treatment for aggression and tics in children with Tourette's syndrome. Olanzapine was generally well tolerated, although significant weight gain was observed throughout the trial.

Longitudinal prescribing patterns for psychoactive medications in community-based individuals with developmental disabilities: utilization of pharmacy records

BACKGROUND

Little is known about longitudinal prescribing practices for psychoactive medications for individuals with intellectual disabilities and developmental disabilities (IDDD) who are living in community settings.

METHODS

Computerized pharmacy records were accessed for 2344 community-based individuals with IDDD for whom a total of 3421 prescriptions were written during a 17-month period of study. Forty-two psychoactive medications were rank ordered in terms of prescription frequency.

RESULTS

Fifty-two per cent (52%) of all prescriptions written during the study period were for psychoactive medications. Anticonvulsant, antipsychotic and antidepressant medications were the most commonly filled prescriptions among psychoactive medications. Sixty per cent (62%) of the study population was given prescriptions for more than one psychoactive medication and 36% received three or more psychoactive medications. During the study period there was a statistically significant increase in prescriptions filled for olanzapine, risperidone, valproic acid, and clonazepam whereas prescriptions filled for thioridazine, haloperidol, and benzotropine showed a significant decline (P < 0.05-0.001). Distribution of psychoactive drug class by age showed that the majority of prescriptions were filled for individuals between 20 and 50 years with the exception of prescriptions for psychostimulants which peaked for individuals prior to 20 years.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Analysis of pharmacy billing records provides a method for assessing prescribing patterns of psychoactive medications in community-based individuals with IDDD. (2) Polypharmacy for psychoactive medications is prevalent in this setting. (3) The second-generation antipsychotic medications are prominently represented by an increasing number of filled prescriptions during the study period.

Risperidone and olanzapine in adults with intellectual disability: a clinical naturalistic study

Atypical antipsychotics are the first-line treatment for psychosis and are commonly used for behavioural problems in people with intellectual disabilities (ID), but a comprehensive evidence base for this approach is lacking. We studied prescription trends and the clinical effectiveness of risperidone and olanzapine in people with ID in a clinical, naturalistic setting. The results suggest that both drugs are well tolerated and effective in treating target symptoms across a range of diagnoses and ID. Both risperidone and olanzapine appear to reach full efficacy within 3 months, after which improvement reaches a plateau, as reflected in the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale. Compliance with both drugs is high. Olanzapine tended to be prescribed mostly for psychotic disorders, and showed good rates of response, whereas risperidone was prescribed mostly for people with behavioural disturbance associated with a psychiatric diagnosis. Furthermore, approximately one-quarter of the risperidone group were prescribed the medication for a behavioural disorder associated with a pervasive developmental disorder. Again, the medication was broadly effective in treatment. Both medications were also used to effectively treat affective disorders in a small percentage of patients. This study appears to indicate that both medications could be of significant clinical benefit for people with ID across a wide range of diagnoses and level of ID, although further controlled trials are required.

Beyond the disability: recognizing mental health issues among persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities

Current societal changes mean increased possibilities for individuals with I/DD to participate in work, family, and community life. However, as individuals with I/DD have at least the same prevalence of mental health disorders as the general population and possibly an increased susceptibility to some mental health disorders, their ability to participate in work, housing, and social opportunities is hampered. It is important to improve nursing education about the specific issues of mental health care of individuals with I/DD. An important area for nursing research and education are improved clinical and practice guidelines. Research on medications and other therapies in mental health care of individuals with I/DD is limited and has methodological limitations. Nursing education and training are holistic, and nursing has the potential of positive impact on practice, education, and research that will improve the mental health care of individuals with I/DD.