Attitudes of nurses towards the use of physical restraints in geriatric care: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies

OBJECTIVES

To examine nurses' attitudes towards the use of physical restraints in geriatric care.

DESIGN

Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies.

DATA SOURCES

The following databases were searched: Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Psyndex, PsychInfo, Social SciSearch, SciSearch, Forum Qualitative Social Research (1/1990 to 8/2013). We performed backward and forward citation tracking to all of the included studies.

REVIEW METHODS

We included in the present review all qualitative and quantitative studies in English and German that investigated nurses' attitudes towards the use of physical restraints in geriatric care. Two independent reviewers selected the studies for inclusion and assessed the study quality. We performed a thematic synthesis for the qualitative studies and a content analysis of the questionnaires' items as well as a narrative synthesis for the quantitative surveys.

RESULTS

We included 31 publications in the review: 20 quantitative surveys, 10 qualitative and 1 mixed-method study. In the qualitative studies, nurses' attitudes towards the use of physical restraints in geriatric care were predominately characterised by negative feelings towards the use of restraints; however, the nurses also described a perceived need for using restraints in clinical practice. This discrepancy led to moral conflicts, and nurses described several strategies for coping with these conflicts when restraints were used. When nurses were in doubt regarding the use of restraints, they decided predominantly in favour of using restraints. The results of the quantitative surveys were inconsistent regarding nurses' feelings towards the use of restraints in geriatric care. Prevention of falls was identified as a primary reason for using restraints. However, the items of the questionnaires focussed primarily on the reasons for the use of restraints rather than on the attitudes of nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of evidence regarding the benefits of restraints and the evidence on the adverse effects, nurses often decided in favour of using restraints when in doubt and they used strategies to cope with negative feelings when they used restraints. A clear policy change in geriatric care institutions towards restraint-free care seems to be warranted to change clinical practice. The results of this review should also be considered in the development of interventions aimed at reducing the use of restraints.

Attitudes of relatives of nursing home residents toward physical restraints

PURPOSE

Attitudes of nursing home staff, residents, and their relatives determine the decision-making process about the use of physical restraints. Knowledge of staffs' attitudes toward physical restraints is sparse; even less is known about relatives' attitudes. Therefore, we surveyed relatives' attitudes and opinions toward physical restraints and compared the results to a survey of nursing home staff.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey comparing 177 nursing home residents' relatives from 13 German facilities in 2008 to 258 nursing home nurses from 25 German facilities in 2007.

METHODS

The German version of the Maastricht Attitude Questionnaire was administered. Part I contains 22 items with three subscales (reasons, consequences, and appropriateness of restraints); Part II contains 16 items evaluating restrictiveness and discomfort of restraint measures, respectively. Descriptive and explorative inferential statistics were used for data analyses.

FINDINGS

Response rate in both samples was above 90%. Mean age was 62 years (SD 12.60; range 24-93) in relatives and 44 years (SD 11.40; range 19-65) in nurses; 72% and 82% were female, respectively. Relatives assess physical restraints a little more positively compared to nurses, with an average of 3.40 (SD 0.60) versus 3.07 (SD 0.48) on a 5-point scale (5=strongly positive attitude). Relatives assess physical restraints as slightly less restrictive, with 2.11 (SD 0.33), and as less discomforting, with 2.10 (SD 0.38) points, compared to nursing staff, who assess the restraints' restrictiveness with 2.19 (SD 0.29) points and its discomfort with 2.17 (SD 0.32) on a 3-point scale (3=very restrictive/discomforting). Both groups consider wrist and ankle belts as most restrictive and uncomfortable, while sensor mats, infrared systems, and unilateral bedrails were rated as the lowest for restrictiveness and discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Attitudes of nursing home residents' relatives toward physical restraints are rather positive and generally comparable with nursing home staffs' attitudes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Interventions aimed to reduce physical restraints need to include education of both staff and relatives of nursing home residents.

Programme d'intervention visant à réduire l'utilisation des contentions physiques dans des unités de soins de longue durée — mise en oeuvre et effets sur le personnel soignant

This study aimed at (a) developing a restraint reduction program, (b) describing its implementation in long-term care units, and (c) examining its effects on care staff's perceptions of and knowledge about the use of restraints. The program was composed of three parts: consciousness-raising meetings, staff education, and clinical follow-up. The study was a randomized, controlled clinical trial with eight intervention care units (five nursing homes) and 11 controls (five additional nursing homes). Care staff was surveyed at two time intervals over a 7-month period (pre- and post-test intervention; intervention care units: N = 171 [T0] and N = 158 [T1]; controls: N = 181 [T0] and N = 166 [T1]). The implementation of the program was successful and results showed significant changes in care staff perceptions of and knowledge about the use of restraints.

Individualized care: perceptions of certified nurse's aides

Despite substantial attention devoted to the development of individualized care in nursing homes during recent years, empirical research assessing progress is limited. Further, few studies have explored the experiences of certified nurse's aides (CNAs) in this regard. This survey examines the perceptions and experiences of CNAs in providing individualized care. CNAs (n = 254) were asked to describe a number of current practices and obstacles to implementing individualized care in nursing homes. The majority of respondents reported experiencing: flexibility to change daily schedules; supervisor assistance with challenging residents; active participation in care planning; freedom to test new approaches to care; and supervisors who are open to CNA suggestions. Several barriers to individualized care were also described, including: inadequate staffing; poor team communication; staff attitudes; and a lack of knowledge and training in alternative approaches. These findings provide important insights into the supports and obstacles to implementing individualized care in nursing homes from the perspective of CNAs.

Developing individualized care in nursing homes: integrating the views of nurses and certified nurse aides

Despite recent attention devoted to the development of individualized care in nursing homes, empirical research assessing changes in practice is quite limited, and very few studies have explored specifically the experiences and perceptions of certified nurse aides (CNAs). This study reports findings from a comparative analysis conducted on a data set including quantitative and qualitative data from CNAs (N = 289) and nurses in Connecticut (N = 245). Measures of obstacles to individualized care and needs for future supports were explored. A number of significant differences in perceptions of obstacles to providing individualized care were found. The nurses were significantly more likely to identify the following impediments to change: cost (p < .0001), concepts not integrated into work (p < .0001), lack of administrative support (p < .10), and staff attitudes (p < .10). The CNAs were significantly more likely to report inadequate staffing (p < .001), lack of interdisciplinary teams (p < .001), and resident and family attitudes (p < .01) as problematic. These findings suggest substantial discordance among nurses and CNAs on a number of important issues surrounding individualized care. Such disparate perceptions pose challenges to nursing homes committed to the implementation of individualized care alternatives. Successful approaches must consider the various vantage points of caregivers and administrators.