1
|
James L, Jacobs KE, Roodenburg J. Adoption of the Cattell–Horn–Carroll Model of Cognitive Abilities by Australian Psychologists. AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/ap.12110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lara James
- Faculty of Education, Monash University,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herbstrith JC. Book Review: WISC-V assessment and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives By Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., & Holdnack, J. A. (Eds.). JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT 2015. [DOI: 10.1177/0734282915615449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
3
|
Kaufman JC, Kaufman AS. It Can Be Very Tempting to Throw Out the Baby With the Bathwater: A Father-and-Son Commentary on “Does IQ Really Predict Job Performance?”. APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2015.1008922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
4
|
Abstract
This special issue focuses on two lead articles examining the factor structure of the fourth editions of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, 2003) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children (WISC-IV; Wechsler, 2008). These articles are followed by 9 commentaries and a final response by the authors of the lead articles. These diverse approaches critically assess the theoretical and practice implications of the structure of intelligence measured by the Wechsler scales.
Collapse
|
5
|
Weiss LG, Keith TZ, Zhu J, Chen H. Technical and Practical Issues in the Structure and Clinical Invariance of the Wechsler Scales. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT 2013. [DOI: 10.1177/0734282913478050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This discussion article addresses issues related to expansion of the Wechsler model from four to five factors; multiple broad CHC abilities measured by the Arithmetic subtest; advantages and disadvantages of including complex tasks requiring integration of multiple broad abilities when measuring intelligence; limitations of factor analysis, which constrain test developers to creating specific broad and narrow abilities as opposed to integrative tasks; implications from brain imaging research showing the critical role of neurological pathways that integrate brain regions; close relationship of the fluid reasoning factor to g, and the inadequacies of factor analytically driven statistical definitions of g in the development of improved models of intelligence. In this rejoinder to the commentaries in this special issue on structural models of the WAIS-IV and WISC-IV, the advantages and disadvantages of Schmid–Leiman’s transformation, which removes the effects of g on the broad abilities, and the use of nested or bifactor models in evaluating models of intelligence are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jianjun Zhu
- Pearson Clinical Assessment, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Hsinyi Chen
- National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|