Practical learnings from an epidemiology study on TDI-related occupational asthma: Part I-Cumulative exposure is not a good indicator of risk

Development of a new SPE UPLC-MS/MS method for extraction and quantitation of toluene diamine on gloves following toluene diisocyanate exposure

RATIONALE

Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) is a highly reactive isocyanate commonly used as a mixture of 2,4- and 2,6- isomers in the production of flexible foams. Exposure to TDI occurs primarily through vapour inhalation in workplaces where TDI is produced or used, but dermal exposure is also possible during some tasks. To ensure workplace safety, accurate monitoring of TDI and toluene diamine (TDA) levels is required. Methods of quantifying field effectiveness of gloves in preventing dermal exposure have not been established. Therefore, there is a need to develop a new practical method for assessing glove effectiveness for TDI/TDA.

METHOD

A new offline SPE UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of TDA isomers from TDI-exposed gloves was developed. Gloves were dipped in a solution of 1% acetic acid leading to a full conversion to TDA. TDA-free amine compounds were derivatized with acetic anhydride to increase chromatographic retention and signal intensity.

RESULTS

2,4-Diaminotoluene-α, α, α-d3 (2,4-d₃ -TDA) was selected as a surrogate standard to minimise the variability in sample preparation and instrumental sensitivity. The choice of UPLC-MS/MS operated in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode allowed to reach much lower limits of detection (LOD). The LOD of the method was 6.86 and 2.83 ng/mL (0.03 and 0.01 μg) for 2,6-TDA and 2,4-TDA, respectively. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 22.85 and 9.42 ng/mL (0.11 and 0.05 μg) for 2,6-TDA and 2,4-TDA, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A new UPLC-MS/MS analytical method has been developed to determine field effectiveness of gloves for preventing dermal exposure to TDI/TDA. The new technique overcomes some limitations for measuring putative dermal exposure to isocyanates and may be useful in exposure monitoring and future research on isocyanate health risks.

Toluene diisocyanate occupational exposure data in the polyurethane industry (2005-2020): A descriptive summary from an industrial hygiene perspective

This article provides an overview of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) workplace air concentration data. Data were collected between 2005-2020 in workplaces across the United States, Canada, and the European Union by a number of different organizations, primarily using the sampling procedures published in OSHA Methods 42 and 5002. The data were then collated and organized by the International Isocyanate Institute. Air samples were collected from several market segments, with a large portion of the data (87%) from the flexible foam industry. The air samples (2534 in total) were categorized into "area" or "personal," and the personal samples were subcategorized into "task," "short term," and "long term." Most of the air sample concentrations (87%) were less than 5 ppb. However, the presence of airborne TDI greater than 5 ppb indicated the importance of respiratory protection in some situations; therefore, respirator use patterns were studied and summarized. Additionally, this article provides a summary of air sample concentrations at different flexible foam manufacturing job roles. The information on air sampling concentrations and respiratory protection during TDI applications collected in this paper could be useful for product stewardship and industrial hygiene purposes in the industries studied.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate and toluene diisocyanate: Many similarities and few differences

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI) are high production volume chemicals used for the manufacture of polyurethanes. For both substances, the most relevant adverse health effects after overexposure in the workplace are isocyanate-induced asthma, lung function decrement and, to a much lesser extent, skin effects. Over the last two decades many articles have addressed the reactivity of MDI and TDI in biological media and the associated biochemistry, which increased the understanding of their biochemical and physiological behavior. In this review, these new insights with respect to similarities and differences concerning the adsorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of these two diisocyanates and the implications on their toxicities are summarized. Both TDI and MDI show very similar behavior in reactivity to biological macromolecules, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Evidence suggests that the isocyanate (NCO) group is scavenged at the portal-of-entry and is not systemically available in unbound reactive form. This explains the lack of other than portal-of-entry toxicity observed in repeated-dose inhalation tests.

Practical learnings from an epidemiology study on TDI-related occupational asthma: Part II-Exposure without respiratory protection to TWA-8 values indicative of peak events is a good indicator of risk

The anonymized data of an epidemiology study on the incidence of toluene diisocyanate (TDI)-related occupational asthma in three US-based TDI production facilities have been reanalyzed to identify where to best focus exposure reduction efforts in industrial practice in order to reduce the risk of sensitization to TDI. In Part I, it was demonstrated that cumulative exposure is not a good indicator of the risk of developing TDI-related occupational asthma. In this Part II, an alternative model was developed based on net exposure parameters (i.e. samples taken when no respiratory protection was used). A statistically significant relationship was determined between asthma incidence and the frequency of exposure to TDI levels indicative of peak events that are expressed as time-weighted average-8 (TWA-8) values greater than 3 ppb during which no respiratory protection was used. This relationship suggests a threshold to induction of TDI-related asthma. The findings also highlight the importance of a comprehensive program for controlling workplace atmosphere in the plant by technical measures (e.g. selection of equipment, cleaning procedures) and controlling exposure by organizational measures and situational awareness (e.g. training, use of in-the-field direct reading indicators) during high potential exposure scenarios (e.g. line breaking, spills) to encourage or enforce the appropriate use of respiratory protection.