A scoping literature review of factors influencing cancer patients' self-perceived burden

PURPOSE

A cancer diagnosis disrupts the peaceful lives and plans of patients and even their caregivers, and patients can easily feel burdened when they are being cared for by others. However, the influencing factors of self-perceived burden (SPB) have not been summarized, and related research is still in its infancy. This review explores factors related to the SPB of cancer patients and identifies future research directions.

METHOD

A systematic search, including trolling through six electronic databases, was conducted to identity articles published in English and Chinese from January 2003 to April 2022, using key terms related to cancer patients' burden on others; a manual search was also performed on the articles' reference lists.

RESULTS

Thirty-three articles were identified. The content was described into three groups: patient-related factors, caregiver-related factors, and family-related (financial) factors. Despite the heterogeneity, patients' physical/disease factors, psychological factors, social factors, caregiver type, quality of care provided, caregiver physical and psychological status, and financial factors were all correlated with SPB.

CONCLUSIONS

This literature review shows that SPB imposes a huge burden on cancer patients, and that SPB in cancer patients is influenced by patient-related factors, caregiver-related factors, and family factors. These influencing factors directly or indirectly affect SPB. In addition, SPB is complex and studies related to its factors deserve a further detailed analysis based on the actual situation of the patients in order to make the results more accurate and relevant.

Coping Strategies for Self-perceived Burden Among Advanced Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Self-perceived burden (SPB) causes stress and negatively impacts the quality of life and mental health of patients. It is important to identify effective coping methods to reduce SPB when supporting advanced cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively elucidate advanced cancer patients' strategies for coping with SPB.

METHODS

Eleven participants with advanced cancer were recruited from 2 palliative care units. The data were collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed by content analysis.

RESULTS

One of the coping strategies that advanced cancer patients used to reduce their SPB was "making individual efforts to deal with their own circumstances." This category included subcategories: "making proactive action," "expressing their gratitude verbally," "suppressing their feelings," "searching for positive meanings," and "avoiding thinking about the burden on their families." Another coping strategy used was "exploring the solutions with their family," which consisted of one subcategory and indicated an open dialogue between patients and their families to reach acceptable and mutual decisions about patient care.

CONCLUSION

Nurses should not only support patients' efforts to tackle the situation by themselves, but also help the family as a whole to tackle problems together. By facilitating meaningful dialogue between family members, patients' feelings of SPB can be alleviated.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses should facilitate dialogue between patients and their family members in order to help them discover solutions to reduce their SPB and to find positive meanings in the caregiving-receiving situation.

20th Anniversary Update of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework Part 1: A Systematic Review of the Decisional Needs of People Making Health or Social Decisions

Background. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) has been used for 20 years to assess and address people’s decisional needs. The evidence regarding ODSF decisional needs has not been synthesized. Objectives. To synthesize evidence from ODSF-based decisional needs studies, identify new decisional needs, and validate current ODSF decisional needs. Methods. A mixed-studies systematic review. Nine electronic databases were searched. Inclusion criteria: studies of people’s decisional needs when making health or social decisions for themselves, a child, or a mentally incapable person, as reported by themselves, families, or practitioners. Two independent authors screened eligibility, extracted data, and quality appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were analyzed using narrative synthesis. Results. Of 4532 citations, 45 studies from 7 countries were eligible. People’s needs for 101 unique decisions (85 health, 16 social) were reported by 2857 patient decision makers ( n = 36 studies), 92 parent decision makers ( n = 6), 81 family members ( n = 5), and 523 practitioners ( n = 21). Current ODSF decisional needs were reported in 2 to 40 studies. For 6 decisional needs, there were 11 new (manifestations): 1) information (overload, inadequacy regarding others’ experiences with options), 2) difficult decisional roles (practitioner, family involvement, or deliberations), 3) unrealistic expectations (difficulty believing outcome probabilities apply to them), 4) personal needs (religion/spirituality), 5) difficult decision timing (unpredictable), and 6) unreceptive decisional stage (difficulty accepting condition/need for treatment, powerful emotions limiting information processing, lacking motivation to consider delayed/unpredictable decisions). Limitations. Possible publication bias (only peer-reviewed journals included). Possible missed needs (non-ODSF studies, patient decision aid development studies, 3 ODSF needs added in 2006). Conclusion. We validated current decisional needs, identified 11 new manifestations of 6 decisional needs, and recommended ODSF revisions.

Decision-Making about the Place of Death for Cancer Patients: A Concept Analysis

Objective:

The objective of the study was to conduct a concept analysis of “decision-making about the place of death for cancer patients” to develop a theoretical definition of the concept and identify its attributes, antecedents, and outcomes.

Methods:

The Rodgers' evolutionary model of concept analysis was used. A literature search for papers published from 2000 to 2017 was conducted using the keywords: “cancer,” “place,” “death,” and “decision-making” for the search of the electronic databases.

Results:

Thirty articles were selected for this analysis. As a result, five attributes, six antecedents, and five consequences were extracted. [options to choose as a place of death], [wishes of the patients themselves], [consideration of the burden on the family], [open discussions with other persons concerned], and [best choice according to circumstances] are considered to be the characteristics in the decision-making about the place of death for cancer patients.

Conclusions:

This concept is defined as “The best choice according to circumstances of the cancer patients among different options for a place of death, resulting from a careful evaluation of the wishes of these patients and the burden on the family, as well as through open discussions with other persons concerned.” Nurses need to assist patients discuss deaths with important others, such as family members, in making decisions about the place of death. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the details of the categories and relationships shown in the attributes in this study, investigating the actual conditions of the patients and their families.

Do published patient decision aids for end-of-life care address patients' decision-making needs? A systematic review and critical appraisal

BACKGROUND

Many decisions are made by patients in their last months of life, creating complex decision-making needs for these individuals. Identifying whether currently existing patient decision aids address the full range of these patient decision-making needs will better inform end-of-life decision support in clinical practice.

AIMS AND DESIGN

This systematic review aimed to (a) identify the range of patients' decision-making needs and (b) assess the extent to which patient decision aids address these needs.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL electronic literature databases were searched (January 1990-January 2017), supplemented by hand-searching strategies. Eligible literature reported patient decision-making needs throughout end-of-life decision-making or were evaluations of patient decision aids. Identified decision aid content was mapped onto and assessed against all patient decision-making needs that were deemed 'addressable'.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies described patient needs, and seven end-of-life patient decision aids were identified. Patient needs were categorised, resulting in 48 'addressable' needs. Mapping needs to patient decision aid content showed that 17 patient needs were insufficiently addressed by current patient decision aids. The most substantial gaps included inconsistent acknowledgement, elicitation and documentation of how patient needs varied individually for the level of information provided, the extent patients wanted to participate in decision-making, and the extent they wanted their families and associated healthcare professionals to participate.

CONCLUSION

Patient decision-making needs are broad and varied. Currently developed patient decision aids are insufficiently addressing patient decision-making needs. Improving future end-of-life patient decision aid content through five key suggestions could improve patient-focused decision-making support at the end of life.

Self-Perceived Burden to Others: Patient and Family Caregiver Correlates

Aims

To provide further evidence about the prevalence and correlates of the sense of “self-perceived burden” (SPB) to others, and to examine its association with caregiver reports of burden.

Methods

The participants were 65 patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. Patients completed measures of SPB and family members completed a caregiver burden scale.

Results

SPB was experienced at minimal to mild levels by 35% of patients, and at moderate to extreme levels by another 28%. It was correlated with some physical symptoms, but more frequently with psychological symptoms. The family members of patients who reported that SPB was a significant problem had higher scores on the caregiver burden scale than family members of other patients (p=0.048), although the overall correlation was modest.

Conclusions

SPB is a common and distressing concern for many patients receiving palliative care and is associated with a number of other distressing concerns.

Associations between Japanese People's Concern about Family Caregiver Burden and Preference for End-Of-Life Care Location

Through a cross-sectional nationwide survey, this study identified the associations between Japanese people's choice of end-of-life care location and their sense of being a burden or a source of concern to their family members. A total of 1,042 people responded to the survey (a response rate of 55 percent). Of these, 44 percent said they would prefer to receive end-of-life care at home, 15 percent in hospital, 19 percent in a palliative care unit, 10 percent in a public nursing home, and 2 percent in a private nursing home. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that those who thought it most important to relieve caregiver burden on family members tended to prefer a palliative care unit or a public nursing home to their own homes; those who were most concerned about the effect their death would have on their family members tended to prefer a hospital or a palliative care unit to their own homes. These findings may assist in the development of a more effective end-of-life care system in Japan and in other countries.

Skills Training to Support Patients considering place of End-Of-Life Care: A Randomized Control Trial

The effect of a program to train clinicians to support patients making decisions about place of end-of-life care was evaluated. In all, 88 oncology and/or palliative care nursing and allied health providers from three Ontario health networks were randomly assigned to an education or control condition. Quality of decision support provided to standardized patients was measured before and after training, as were participants’ perceptions about the acceptability of the training program and their intentions to engage in patient decision support. Compared to controls, intervention group members improved the quality of decision support provided and were more likely to address a wider range of decision-making needs. Intervention group members scored higher on a knowledge test of decision support than controls and rated the components as acceptable. Improvements in the quality of decision support can be made by providing training and practical tools such as a patient decision aid.

Theories of Health Care Decision Making at the End of Life: A Meta-Ethnography

The aim of this meta-ethnography is to appraise the types and uses of theories relative to end-of-life decision making and to develop a conceptual framework to describe end-of-life decision making among patients with advanced cancers, heart failure, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and their caregivers or providers. We used PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases to extract English-language articles published between January 2002 and April 2015. Forty-three articles were included. The most common theories included decision-making models ( n = 14) followed by family-centered ( n = 11) and behavioral change models ( n = 7). A conceptual framework was developed using themes including context of decision making, communication and negotiation of decision making, characteristics of decision makers, goals of decision making, options and alternatives, and outcomes. Future research should enhance and apply these theories to guide research to develop patient-centered decision-making programs that facilitate informed and shared decision making at the end of life among patients with advanced illness and their caregivers.

Specific Words and Experience Matter to Surrogates When Making End of Life Decisions

This grant funded preliminary study investigated the relationship between end-of-life terminologies and decisional conflict in surrogate decision makers using a convenience sample of 234 adults aged 50 and older. Participants were randomized into two groups; each received a survey packet that varied only in the use of the words "Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)" and "Allow Natural Death (AND)." The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) was administered and demographic data were collected. No difference was found in the total DCS scores based on the AND and DNR versions. However, AND respondents perceived their decision as a good decision and were eight times more likely to sign the document than DNR participants. Experienced decision-makers evolved as a discrete group. They had lower mean total DCS scores and lower mean subscores, indicating that prior experience is an important aspect of end-of-life decision-making. Experienced AND participants were more likely to perceive their decision as good and were more likely to be sure of their decision, indicating that they respond more favorably to the words Allow Natural Death. Respondents to the DNR version were likely to not sign or postpone signing. Those who frequently attended religious services were twice as likely as those who rarely attend religious services of implementing their decision; whether the decision is to sign or not to sign the AND or DNR. Finally, participants were more likely to withdraw from the study when the term DNR was used. Recommendations for future research are presented.

Shared decision-making at the end of life: A focus group study exploring the perceptions and experiences of multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals working in the home setting

BACKGROUND

Globally recommended in healthcare policy, Shared Decision-Making is also central to international policy promoting community palliative care. Yet realities of implementation by multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals who provide end-of-life care in the home are unclear.

AIM

To explore multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences of Shared Decision-Making at end of life in the home.

DESIGN

Qualitative design using focus groups, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 43 participants, from multi-disciplinary community-based services in one region of the United Kingdom, were recruited.

RESULTS

While the rhetoric of Shared Decision-Making was recognised, its implementation was impacted by several interconnecting factors, including (1) conceptual confusion regarding Shared Decision-Making, (2) uncertainty in the process and (3) organisational factors which impeded Shared Decision-Making.

CONCLUSION

Multiple interacting factors influence implementation of Shared Decision-Making by professionals working in complex community settings at the end of life. Moving from rhetoric to reality requires future work exploring the realities of Shared Decision-Making practice at individual, process and systems levels.

Factors associated with self-perceived burden to the primary caregiver in older patients with hematologic malignancies: an exploratory study

OBJECTIVE

Although cancer patients frequently experience self-perceived burden to others, this perception has not been enough studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of self-perceived burden to the primary caregiver (SPB-PC) and associated factors in an older patient population with hematologic malignancies at the time of chemotherapy initiation.

METHODS

In total, 166 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies aged ≥65 years were recruited at the time of chemotherapy initiation. Patients' SPB-PC was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Characteristics potentially associated with SPB-PC, including sociodemographic and medical characteristics, physical functioning status (Karnofsky performance score, activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental ADL), symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea, quality of life), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)), perceived cognitive function (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive (FACT-Cog) Scale), and patients'/primary caregivers' personal relationship characteristics (family tie, support), were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five percent of patients reported moderate to severe SPB-PC (VAS ≥ 50 mm). Patients' SPB-PC was associated with lower Karnofsky performance (β = -0.135, p = 0.058) and ADL (β = -0.148, p = 0.037) scores, and higher HADS (β = 0.283, p < 0.001) and FACT-Cog perceived cognitive impairments subscale (β = 0.211, p = 0.004) scores. The proportion of explained variance was 23.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care professionals should be aware that about one third of older cancer patients experience moderate to severe SPB-PC at the time of chemotherapy initiation. They should adapt their support of patients who report such a feeling. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Patterns in place of cancer death in the State of Qatar: a population-based study

Background

International studies show that most people prefer to die at home; however, hospitals remain the most common place of death (PoD). This study aims to investigate the patterns in PoD and the associated factors, which are crucial for end-of-life cancer care enhancement.

Method

This retrospective, population-based study analyzed all registered cancer deaths in Qatar between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2012 (n = 1,224). The main outcome measures were patient characteristics: age, gender, nationality, cancer diagnosis, year of death, and PoD. Time trends for age-standardized proportions of death in individual PoDs were evaluated using chi-square analysis. Odds ratio (OR) were determined for variables associated with the most preferred (acute palliative care unit [APCU] and hematology/oncology ward) versus least preferred (ICU and general medicine ward) PoDs in Qatar, stratified by nationality.

Results

The hematology/oncology ward was the most common PoD (32.4%; 95% CI 26.7–35.3%) followed by ICU (31.4%; 95% CI 28.7–34.3%), APCU (26.9%; 95% CI 24.3–29.6%), and general medicine ward (9.2%; 95% CI 7.6–11.1%). APCU trended upward (+0.057/year; p<0.001), while the hematology/oncology ward trended downward (−0.055/year; p<0.001). No statistically significant changes occurred in the other PoDs; home deaths remained low (0.4%; 95% Cl 0.38–0.42). Qataris who died from liver cancer (OR 0.23) and aged 65 or older (OR 0.64) were less likely to die in the APCU or hematology/oncology ward (p<0.05). Non-Qataris who died from pancreatic cancer (OR 3.12) and female (OR 2.05) were more likely to die in the APCU or hematology/oncology ward (p<0.05). Both Qataris and non-Qataris who died from hematologic malignancy (OR 0.18 and 0.41, respectively) were more likely to die in the ICU or general medicine ward (p<0.05).

Conclusion

A high percentage of cancer deaths in Qatar occur in hospital. As home was the preferred PoD for most people, effective home care and hospice programs are needed to improve end-of-life cancer care.

Where to die? That is the question: A study of cancer patients in Israel

OBJECTIVE

Most patients prefer to die at home, but barely 30% do so. This study examines the variables contributing to dying at home.

METHODS

The participants were 326 cancer patients, of both genders, with a mean age of 63.25 years, who died from 2000 to 2008 and were treated by the palliative care unit of the Barzilai Hospital. Some 65.7% died at home and 33.4% in a hospital. The data were extracted from patient files. The examined variables were demographic (e.g., age, gender, marital status, ethnic background, number of years in Israel until death), medical (e.g., age at diagnosis, diagnosis, nature of last treatment, patient received nursing care, patient given the care of a social worker, patient had care of a psychologist, family received care of a social worker, patient had a special caregiver), and sociological (e.g., having insurance, having worked in Israel, living alone or with family, living with one's children, living in self-owned or rented house, family members working).

RESULTS

The findings indicate that the chances of dying at home are higher if the patient is non-Ashkenazi, the family got social worker care, the patient lived in a self-owned house, the patient lived with his family, the family members worked, and the patient's stay in Israel since immigration was longer. Logistic regression showed that all the predictors together yielded a significant model accounting for 10.9-12.3% of the variance.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The findings suggest that dying at home requires maintaining continued care for the patient and family in a community context.

Shared decision-making in palliative care: a systematic mixed studies review using narrative synthesis

The aim of this study is to synthesize knowledge about the process of shared decision-making (SDM) in palliative care. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Web of Science were searched with core concepts: shared decisions, patient participation in decision-making, and palliative care. Titles and abstracts were screened according to inclusion criteria (original research, adult patients, Western contexts, decision-making, palliative treatment or setting), yielding 37 articles for analysis. A narrative synthesis was created using the methods of thematic analysis, conceptual mapping, and critical reflection on the synthesis process. Results demonstrate that while a majority of patients want to participate in treatment decisions to some extent, most do not achieve their preferred levels of involvement because decisions are delayed and alternative treatment options are seldom discussed. The literature regarding the process of SDM itself remains scarce in palliative care. Further research is needed in order to better understand the longitudinal, interactive, and interdisciplinary process of decision-making in palliative care.

Constructing understandings of end-of-life care in Europe: a qualitative study involving cognitive interviewing with implications for cross-national surveys

BACKGROUND

Although national findings regarding people's end-of-life care (EoLC) preferences and priorities are available within Europe, a lack of research coordination between countries has meant that cross-national understandings of EoLC remain unknown.

PURPOSE

To (1) identify English and German understandings of EoLC within the context of an EoLC survey, and (2) to synthesise these understandings to aid interpretation of results from a cross-national survey.

METHODS

An inductive and interpretive two-phased sequential design involving (1) qualitative analysis of cognitive interview data from 15 English and 15 German respondents to develop country-related categories, and (2) qualitative synthesis to identify a conceptually coherent understanding of EoLC.

RESULTS

Open and axial coding resulted in six English and six German categories. Commonalities included (a) the importance of social and relational dimensions, (b) dynamic decision making comprising uncertainty, (c) a valuing of life's quality and quantity, and (d) expectations for holistic care involving autonomy, choice, and timely information from trusted professionals. Differences involved attention to practical matters, and thoughts about prolongation of life, preferred place of death, and the role of media and context. Synthesis resulted in four concepts with underlying coherence: expectations of a high standard of EoLC involving autonomy, choice, and context; evolving decision making amid anticipated change; thoughts about living and existing; and worldviews shaping EoLC preferences in real and hypothetical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Individual and country-related diversity must be remembered when quantifying EoLC understandings. Inductive-interpretive analysis of cognitive interview data aids interpretation of survey findings. Cross-national research coordination and qualitative synthesis assists EoLC in Europe.

The rapidly changing location of death in Canada, 1994-2004

This 2008 study assessed location-of-death changes in Canada during 1994-2004, after previous research had identified a continuing increase to 1994 in hospital deaths. The most recent (1994-2004) complete population and individual-level Statistics Canada mortality data were analyzed, involving 1,806,318 decedents of all Canadian provinces and territories except Quebec. A substantial and continuing decline in hospitalized deaths was found (77.7%-60.6%). This decline was universal among decedents regardless of age, gender, marital status, whether they were born in Canada or not, across urban and rural provinces, and for all but two (infrequent) causes of death. This shift occurred in the absence of policy or purposive healthcare planning to shift death or dying out of hospital. In the developed world, recent changing patterns in the place of death, as well as the location and type of care provided near death appear to be occurring, making location-of-death trends an important topic of investigation. Canada is an important case study for highlighting the significance of location-of-death trends, and suggesting important underlying causal relationships and implications for end-of-life policies and practices.

Nurses' perceptions of factors influencing patient decision support for place of care at the end of life

Although patients have more choices about where to receive care as death approaches, they often need help with decision making. This study identified factors that influence nurses' provision of decision support. A total of 22 nurses, from 3 health networks, participated in semistructured interviews. Overall, nurses held favorable attitudes toward providing decision support for place of care at end of life. Overlap between other professionals' roles and nurses' clinical experience affected nurses' decision support behaviors. Although nurses considered decision support to be part of patient-centered care, they report a lack of skills, confidence, and tools to help them provide it. These findings confirm the need to develop practical postlicensure education strategies and ways to embed patient decision support tools into systems of care.

Decision-making needs of patients with depression: a descriptive study

The study's purpose was to explore the decision-making needs of patients considering treatment options for their depression. Semi-structured interviews were guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Of 94 participants, 67 were uncertain about their decision. Common decisions identified were whether or not to take medications, attend support groups, undergo electroconvulsive therapy, and location of care. Those feeling certain were more likely to have made a decision (RR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.78). However, 40 patients who had 'made a decision' in the recent past were uncertain about their decision. Compared with those who were certain, the uncertain group felt less informed (2.65 vs. 1.64; P < 0.001), less supported (2.63 vs. 1.88; P < 0.001) and less clear about how they valued the benefits and risks of options (2.57 vs. 1.69; P < 0.001). Other influential factors included concerns about confidentiality, distress from depression, embarrassment, panic attacks and lack of energy. Few patients wanted to defer decision making to their physician (n = 8) or family (n = 1). To support decision making, participants identified the need for: discussions with their psychiatrist, nurse or family doctor; access to printed information; and information provided by health professionals and health societies.

Facing uncertainty: the lived experience of palliative care

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative research study listens to the narratives of people experiencing the dying process who attended the Otago Community Hospice, Dunedin, New Zealand.

METHODS

Ten people, aged between 51 and 65, were approached; two declined and one died sooner than expected. All were women (although this was not part of the original design) and all had carcinoma. Data for the study was sought through qualitative research interviews, considering the development of each participant's illness in relation to her perception of her embodiment in the palliative care setting, and concluding with questions about what she wants the people who care for and about her to learn from her experience. Consistent with this phenomenological approach, the method of analysis was thematic and interpretive.

RESULTS

The main theme was the uncertainty that all participants felt throughout the diagnostic process and during treatment. Uncertainty, too, was a factor in how they managed their day, whether they would be able to sustain an outing or an activity or not and whether they would be pain free. None were afraid of dying but hoped that when they did die, they would do so comfortably. The relationship with their general practitioners varied. Where fatigue or the effects of medication were not an issue, they could think clearly, but their bodies were experienced as letting them down and limiting their activities. The ideal of "living until you die" was not able to be fulfilled. The increasing approach of social death as they withdrew from their employment and social responsibilities affected them.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Whether one has a "good death" or not is determined not only by the progression and management of the disease process by health professionals, but also by the way in which one is perceived, by self and others. There are no guidelines for the dying role; everybody dies differently and individually.

Self-perceived burden in cancer patients: validation of the Self-perceived Burden Scale

Although caregiver burden has been studied extensively, cancer patients' self-perceived burden on caregivers has been an understudied phenomenon. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to validate the Self-perceived Burden Scale, a 10-item self-report instrument designed to measure chronically ill patients' experience of burden. Participants were 106 cancer patients (site nonspecific) receiving active cancer treatments at a university cancer center. Factor analysis results indicated that a 9-item version of the scale consisted of a single factor and had good reliability (alpha = .938). Convergent validity was demonstrated with global quality of life (r = -0.546, P < .001), physical well-being (r = -0.547, P < .001), emotional well-being (r = -0.549, P < .001), functional well-being (r = -0.404, P < .001), financial satisfaction (r = -0.284, P = .001), and depression (r = 0.414, P <.001). Tests of divergent validity indicated that the Self-perceived Burden Scale was independent of age, number of people living in the household, disease site, cancer treatment, and sociofamilial well-being. Findings indicate that the Self-perceived Burden Scale may be a useful instrument to assess patients' perceptions of burden on their caregivers. Further studies of the role of patient burden in psychosocial well-being and global quality of life, including validation of the Self-perceived Burden Scale on a larger study sample, are warranted.

Feeling like a burden to others: a systematic review focusing on the end of life

Research into the burden of illness has focused predominantly on family caregivers, with little consideration of the other side of the caregiving relationship-care recipients' perspectives on having become a 'burden to others'. However, there is now a small but growing body of evidence to suggest that worry about creating burden to others is a common and troubling concern for people who are nearing the end of their lives. This concern is referred to as 'self-perceived burden'. The present study provides a systematic review of the literature, addressing self-perceived burden at the end of life. Using standard methods, literature was searched for relevant studies in palliative care and related fields. The review revealed that self-perceived burden is reported as a significant problem by 19- 65% of terminally ill patients. It is correlated with loss of dignity, suffering, and a 'bad death'. Self-perceived burden has also been identified as a relevant factor in death-hastening acts among patients with life-threatening illness, as well as in clinical decisions, such as the choice of place of care at the end of life, advance directives, and acceptance of treatment. Given the unique challenges faced by patients with advanced disease and their families, there is a need for further investigation into this under-researched area.

Feeling like a burden: Exploring the perspectives of patients at the end of life

The issue of caregiver burden within the context of end-of-life care has received considerable attention. Less focus has been directed at the corresponding issue of care recipients' perceptions of being a burden to others, referred to as "self-perceived burden". The purpose of this interpretative phenomenological study was to gain a better understanding of self-perceived burden from the patient's perspective. Fifteen patients (ten women, five men) from Ottawa, Canada, receiving palliative care for advanced cancer were interviewed. Participants' experiences of self-perceived burden were reflected in two major interrelated categories. "Concern for Others" included the physical, social, and emotional hardships participants believed they were creating for others, as well as concerns about the future and likely effect of their death on those around them. "Implications for Self" reflected feelings of responsibility for causing hardships to others, resulting in distress and a diminished sense of self. A third category, "Minimizing Burden", was also identified, which described coping strategies used by participants to alleviate the burden on others and to reduce the negative impact on themselves. These categories and themes are discussed from the perspective of social psychology theory pertaining to the maintenance of equity in relationships.

Factors predicting home death for terminally ill cancer patients receiving hospital-based home care: the Lyon comprehensive cancer center experience

This study aimed to determine factors favoring home death for cancer patients in a context of coordinated home care. A retrospective study was conducted among patients followed up by the home care coordinating unit of the cancer center of Lyon. The main endpoint was place of death. Univariate analysis included general characteristics (age, gender, rural or urban residence, disease), Karnofsky Index (KI), type of care at referral (chemotherapy, palliative care, or other supportive care), and coordinating medical oncologist (MCO) home visits. Significant factors were used in a logistic regression analysis. Of 250 patients, 90 (36%) had home death. Low KI and MCO home visit were correlated with home death (odds ratio, respectively, 2.1 and 3.1). These results indicate that health care support favors home death. A hospital-based home care unit is effective for bridging the gap between community and hospital. MCO home visits offer concrete support to health care professionals, patients, and relatives.

A Burden to Others: A Common Source of Distress for the Terminally Ill

Recent research into the desire for death among people with terminal illness has begun to recognize the importance of "feeling oneself a burden to others" as a factor in suicidal behaviour. In this study, 69 patients with advanced cancer underwent semi-structured interviews. The sense of self-perceived burden was found to be a common experience, reported by 39.1% of participants as a minimal or mild concern and by 38% as a moderate to extreme concern. The sense of burden showed a low correlation with physical symptoms (r = 0.02-0.24) and higher correlations with psychological problems (r = 0.35-0.39) and existential issues (r = 0.45-0.49). Comparisons of participants with high or low levels of self-perceived burden showed the importance of this factor for overall quality of life. In summary, self-perceived burden is an important but underestimated dimension of social cognition in the medically ill.

Decision support: helping patients and families to find a balance at the end of life

Terminally ill patients and their families face many decisions at the end of life that can sometimes be overwhelming. Nurses play a key role in providing decision support so that patients and their families can make timely decisions about their health care that reflect their individual needs and circumstances. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework can help nurses to assess patients' decision-making needs, provide tailored decision support and evaluate the effect of their interventions. The theoretical underpinnings of the model and its implications for palliative care clinical practice are discussed.