1
|
Guité-Verret A, Boivin J, Hanna AMR, Downar J, Bush SH, Marcoux I, Guay D, Tapp D, Lapenskie J, Gagnon B. Continuous palliative sedation until death: a qualitative study of palliative care clinicians' experiences. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:104. [PMID: 38637812 PMCID: PMC11027280 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01426-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The practice of continuous palliative sedation until death is the subject of much medical and ethical debate, which is reflected in the inconsistency that persists in the literature regarding the definition and indications of palliative sedation. AIM This study aims to gain a better understanding of palliative care clinicians' experiences with continuous palliative sedation. DESIGN We conducted a qualitative study based on focus group discussions. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS We conducted six focus groups with a total of 28 palliative care clinicians (i.e., 15 nurses, 12 physicians, and 1 end-of-life doula) from diverse care settings across Canada, where assisted dying has recently been legalized. RESULTS An interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to consolidate the data into six key themes: responding to suffering; grappling with uncertainty; adapting care to ensure ongoing quality; grounding clinical practice in ethics; combining medical expertise, relational tact, and reflexivity; and offering an alternative to assisted death. CONCLUSIONS Interaction with the patient's family, uncertainty about the patient's prognosis, the concurrent practice of assisted dying, and the treatment of existential suffering influence the quality of sedation and indicate a lack of clear palliative care guidelines. Nevertheless, clinicians exhibit a reflective and adaptive capacity that can facilitate good practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Guité-Verret
- Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Réseau Québécois de Recherche en Soins Palliatifs et de fin de vie, Québec, Canada
| | - Jessica Boivin
- Réseau Québécois de Recherche en Soins Palliatifs et de fin de vie, Québec, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- CHU Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Canada
| | | | - James Downar
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Shirley H Bush
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Isabelle Marcoux
- Réseau Québécois de Recherche en Soins Palliatifs et de fin de vie, Québec, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Diane Guay
- Réseau Québécois de Recherche en Soins Palliatifs et de fin de vie, Québec, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Diane Tapp
- Réseau Québécois de Recherche en Soins Palliatifs et de fin de vie, Québec, Canada
- CHU Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Julie Lapenskie
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Bruno Gagnon
- Réseau Québécois de Recherche en Soins Palliatifs et de fin de vie, Québec, Canada.
- CHU Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Canada.
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nolen A, Selby D, Qureshi F, Mills A. Practices of and Perspectives on Palliative Sedation Among Palliative Care Physicians in Ontario, Canada: A Mixed-Methods Study. Palliat Med Rep 2024; 5:94-103. [PMID: 38415075 PMCID: PMC10898238 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Palliative sedation (PS) is a therapeutic intervention employed to manage severe and refractory symptoms in terminally ill patients at end of life. Inconsistencies in PS practice guidelines coupled with clinician ambiguity have resulted in confusion about how PS is best integrated into practice. Understanding the perspectives, experiences, and practices relating to this modality will provide insight into its clinical application and challenges within the palliative care landscape. Objective The aim is to explore the perspectives of palliative care physicians administering PS, including how practitioners define PS, factors influencing decision making about the use of PS, and possible reasons for changes in practice patterns over time. Methods A survey (n = 37) and semistructured interviews (n = 23) were conducted with palliative care physicians throughout Ontario. Codes were determined collaboratively and applied line-by-line by two independent investigators. Survey responses were analyzed alongside interview transcripts and noted to be concordant. Themes were generated through reflexive thematic analysis. Results Five key themes were identified: (1) lack of standardization, (2) differing definitions, (3) logistical challenges, (4) perceived "back-up" to Medical Assistance in Dying, and (5) tool of the most responsible physician. Conclusion There was significant variability in how participants defined PS and in frequency of use of PS. Physicians described greater ease implementing PS when practicing in palliative care units, with significant barriers faced by individuals providing home-based palliative care or working as consultants on inpatient units. Educational efforts are required about the intent and practice of PS, particularly among inpatient interprofessional teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Nolen
- Department of Family and Community Medicine and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Debbie Selby
- Division of Palliative Care and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fahad Qureshi
- Department of Family and Community Medicine and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anneliese Mills
- Department of Family and Community Medicine and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tomczyk M, Jaques C, Jox RJ. Palliative sedation: ethics in clinical practice guidelines - systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 13:e651-e663. [PMID: 37567756 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of our study was to determine whether, and to what degree, the ethical dimension was present in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on palliative sedation, and to identify the ethical issues with respect to the different forms of this practice. The purpose was purely to be descriptive; our aim was not to make any kind of normative judgements on these ethical issues or to develop our own ethical recommendations. METHODS We performed a systematic review of CPGs on the palliative sedation of adults, focusing our analysis on the ethical dimension of these texts and the ethical issues of this practice. The study protocol is registered on PROSPERO. RESULTS In total, 36 current CPGs from four continents (and 14 countries) were included in our analysis. Generally, ethics was rarely referred to or absent from the CPGs. Only six texts contained a specific section explicitly related to ethics. Ethical issues were named, conceptualised and presented in heterogeneous, often confusing ways. It was impossible to identify the ethical issues of each form of palliative sedation. Ethics expertise was not involved in the development of most of the CPGs and, if it was, this did not always correlate with the ethical dimension of the document. CONCLUSIONS Effective cooperation between palliative care clinicians and ethicists should be encouraged, in order to integrate in particular the crucial ethical issues of continuous deep sedation until death when developing or updating CPGs on palliative sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martyna Tomczyk
- Institute of Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cécile Jaques
- Medical Library, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ralf J Jox
- Institute of Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Palliative & Supportive Care Service, Chair in Geriatric Palliative Care, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ostgathe C, Bausewein C, Schildmann E, Bazata J, Handtke V, Heckel M, Klein C, Kremling A, Kurkowski S, Meesters S, Seifert A, Torres Cavazos JL, Ziegler K, Jäger C, Schildmann J. Expert-approved best practice recommendations on the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in specialist palliative care (SedPall). BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:126. [PMID: 37667303 PMCID: PMC10476406 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01243-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in end-of-life care is associated with clinical, ethical and legal challenges. In view of these and of the issue's great importance to patients undergoing intolerable suffering, we conducted a project titled SedPall ("From anxiolysis to deep continuous sedation - Development of recommendations for sedation in palliative care") with the purpose of developing best practice recommendations on the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in specialist palliative care and obtaining feedback and approval from experts in this area. DESIGN Our stepwise approach entailed drafting the recommendations, obtaining expert feedback, conducting a single-round Delphi study, and convening a consensus conference. As an interdisciplinary group, we created a set of best practice recommendations based on previously published guidance and empirical and normative analysis, and drawing on feedback from experts, including patient representatives and of public involvement participants. We set the required agreement rate for approval at the single-round Delphi and the consensus conference at ≥80%. RESULTS Ten experts commented on the recommendations' first draft. The Delphi panel comprised 50 experts and patient and public involvement participants, while 46 participants attended the consensus conference. In total, the participants in these stages of the process approved 66 recommendations, covering the topics "indications", "intent/purpose [of sedation]", "decision-making", "information and consent", "medication and type of sedation", "monitoring", "management of fluids and nutrition", "continuing other measures", "support for relatives", and "team support". The recommendations include suggestions on terminology and comments on legal issues. CONCLUSION Further research will be required for evaluating the feasibility of the recommendations' implementation and their effectiveness. The recommendations and the suggested terminology may serve as a resource for healthcare professionals in Germany on the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in specialist palliative care and may contribute to discussion on the topic at an international level. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS00015047 (German Clinical Trials Register).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Ostgathe
- Department of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 34, Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva Schildmann
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, Augsburg, 86156, Germany
| | - Jeremias Bazata
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Violet Handtke
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Heckel
- Department of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 34, Erlangen, 91052, Germany.
| | - Carsten Klein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 34, Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| | - Alexander Kremling
- Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Sandra Kurkowski
- Department of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 34, Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| | - Sophie Meesters
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Seifert
- Paderborn Centre for Educational Research and Teacher Education - PLAZ Professional School, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Jorge Luis Torres Cavazos
- Department of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 34, Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| | - Kerstin Ziegler
- Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Criminal Law and Medical Criminal Law, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schillerstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Jäger
- Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Criminal Law and Medical Criminal Law, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schillerstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|