Dignity in Dying: A Preliminary Study of Patients in the Last Three Days of Life

The final three days of life of 50 consecutive patients on a busy integrated palliative care service is described, with regard to final cause of death, symptom control, drug prescription, retention of personal function, and other measures possibly relevant to dignity in dying. Good symptom relief was maintained without rapid or high escalation of doses of morphine or sedatives. Personal function was maintained in at least a moderate degree in the majority of patients. This study also illustrates some of the difficulties in describing and evaluating the concept of “dying with dignity”.

Opioid pain medication orders and administration in the last days of life

CONTEXT

Most patients with serious and life-limiting illness experience pain at some point in the illness trajectory.

OBJECTIVES

To describe baseline pain management practices for imminently dying patients in Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMCs) and examine factors associated with these processes, including presence of opioid orders at the time of death and medication administration in the last seven days, 48 hours, and 24 hours of life.

METHODS

Data on orders and administration of opioid pain medication at the end of life were abstracted from the medical records of veterans who died in six VAMC hospitals in 2005.

RESULTS

Of 1068 patient records, 686 (64.2%) had an active order for an opioid medication at the time of death. Of these, 69.8% of patients had received the medication at some time within the last seven days of life, 61.2% within the last 48 hours, and 47.0% within the last 24 hours. In multivariable models, presence of an order for opioid pain medication at the time of death and administration within the last 24 hours were both significantly associated with having a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order (P < 0.0001/0.0002), terminal condition (P < 0.0001/< 0.0001), family presence (P < 0.0001/0.0023), location of death (P = 0.003/0.0005), and having pain noted in the care plan (P = 0.0073/0.0007).

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate a need for improving availability of opioids for end-of-life care in the inpatient setting. Modifiable factors, such as family presence and goals-of-care discussions, suggest potential targets for intervention to improve recognition of the dying process and proactive planning for pain control.

The last 48 hours of life: a case study of symptom control for a patient taking a Buddhist approach to dying

Caring for a patient dying of cancer can, at times, be extremely difficult. Sarah was 39 years old when she died, survived by her husband and two children aged 6 and 4 years. During the weeks leading up to her death, Sarah held extensive discussions with family and the multidisciplinary team. Her goal was to live the remainder of her last few hours as comfortable as possible and to die a "peaceful death". Terminal care is an important phase of life, one in which individuals have the right to expect quality of care to ensure that their death occurs with dignity. Sarah practised Buddhism on a daily basis. Issues of spirituality, serenity and peacefulness in dying were very important to her to ensure a good rebirth.

Opioid use in last week of life and implications for end-of-life decision-making

This study was prompted by public and professional concern that the use of opioids for symptom control might shorten life. We retrospectively analysed the pattern of opioid use in the last week of life in 238 consecutive patients who died in a palliative care unit. Median doses of opioid were low (26.4 mg) in the last 24 h of life and patients who received opioid increases at the end of life did not show shorter survival than those who received no increases. The doctrine of double effect therefore need not be invoked to provide symptom control at the end of life.

Home palliative care for terminal cancer patients: a survey on the final week of life

As part of a large multicentre study on palliative care units in Italy, carried out between 1 January and 30 June 1995, we describe the place, circumstances and 'quality of death' of patients admitted to home palliative care. Data presented refer to 401 patients (67% of the 601 patients randomly selected for evaluation). Of these 401 patients 303 (76%) died at home. According to the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS) pain was fairly well controlled during the final week of life, while the control of other symptoms appeared to be less satisfactory. Invasive procedures were undertaken on 56% of patients, while in hospital the percentage increased to 75%. Twenty-five per cent of patients were totally pharmacologically sedated during the final 12 h of life. Neither the number of symptoms nor other factors were apparently associated with the decision to sedate the patient. The wide variations in the frequency of sedation among centres suggest that the choice to sedate the patient may reflect the provider's behaviour or services' policy rather than the patients' preference or needs. The definition of common criteria and guidelines for sedation of patients should be one of the topics for discussion among palliative care teams.