Effect of Thermal Insulation on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Polytrauma Computed Tomography

Thermal insulation does not hamper assessment of injuries in trauma CT scans

PURPOSE

The use of thermal insulations reduces the risk of hypothermia, therefore decreases the risk of death in trauma victims. The aim of the study was to assess whether thermal insulations cause artifacts, which may hinder the diagnosis of injuries, and how the used thermo-systems alter the radiation dose in polytrauma computed tomography.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans were made using the road accident victim body wrapped consecutively with 7 different covers. 14 injury areas were listed and evaluated by 22 radiologists. The radiation dose was measured using a dosimeter placed on the victim in the abdominal area.

RESULTS

No significant artifacts in any of the tested covers were observed. The presence of few minor artifacts did not hinder the assessment of injuries. Certain materials increased (up to 19,1%) and some decreased (up to -30,3%) the absorbed radiation dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermal insulation systems tested in this study do not cause significant artifacts hindering assessment of injuries in CT scans. Concern for artifacts and increased radiation dose should not be a reason to remove patients' thermal insulation during performing trauma CT-scanning.

Related factors of perioperative low body temperature and incidence of postoperative shivering in patients undergoing complex percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the effect analysis of composite insulation nursing intervention

This study aimed to analyze the factors associated with intraoperative hypothermia and postoperative shivering rates in patients undergoing complex percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and investigate the effects of combined insulation nursing intervention. A total of 168 patients were included, with 103 patients in the control (Ctrl) group receiving routine care and 65 patients in the nursing (Nur) group receiving combined insulation nursing intervention measures. General information, surgical data, temperature, intraoperative hypothermia incidence, postoperative shivering, and complication rates were statistically analyzed between the two groups. Patient temperature, blood pressure, and blood gas indicators including pH value, bicarbonate, and lactate levels were recorded at admission (T0), before anesthesia (T1), 30 min after spinal-epidural combined anesthesia (T2), 60 min (T3), 90 min (T4), 120 min (T5), and postoperatively (T6). The results demonstrated that the average intraoperative temperature of patients in the Nur group was significantly higher than that of the Ctrl group (P < 0.001), and their incidence of hypothermia was significantly lower than that of the Ctrl group (P < 0.01). Additionally, the Nur group exhibited shorter recovery time (18.36 ± 3.58 min), extubation time (28.01 ± 3.12 min), and length of hospital stay (8.45 ± 2.14 days) compared to the Ctrl group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative shivering was 4.62 %, significantly lower than that of the Ctrl group (P < 0.001). Multifactorial analysis revealed that age ≥60 years, stone diameter ≥3.0 cm, irrigation volume ≥3000 mL, nursing intervention measures, and surgical duration were the main factors influencing the occurrence of intraoperative hypothermia. Age ≥60 years, nursing intervention measures, surgical duration, and intraoperative temperature<36 °C are identified as major risk factors for postoperative shivering. This indicates that specialized nursing care and combined insulation nursing intervention measures in patients undergoing complex percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to reducing the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia and postoperative shivering. It is recommended to promptly address the risk factors associated with hypothermia and shivering during and after surgery to mitigate the risk of perioperative complications.

Medical and surgical devices in the emergency and trauma patient: what the radiologist should know, and how they can add value

A variety of different external and internal medical devices are used in the acute setting to maintain life support and manage severely injured and unstable trauma or emergency patients. These devices are inserted into the acutely ill patient with the specific purpose of improving outcome, but misplacement can cause additional morbidity and mortality. Consequently, meaningful interpretation of the position of devices can affect acute management. Some devices such as nasopharyngeal, nasogastric and endotracheal tubes and chest and surgical drains are well known to most clinicians, however, little formal training exists for radiologists in composing their report on the imaging of these devices. The novice radiologist often relies on tips and phrases handed down in an aural tradition or resorts to phrases such as: "position as shown". Furthermore, radiologists with limited experience in trauma might not be familiar with the radiological appearance of other more specific devices. This review will focus on the most common medical devices used in acute trauma patients, indications, radiological appearance and their correct and suboptimal positioning.

Artifacts in fluoroscopy and changes in radiation dose caused by heating blankets and insulating covers during simulated endovascular treatment

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess whether insulating covers and warming systems cause artifacts in fluoroscopy, and whether they alter the radiation dose.

METHODS

Eight insulating and warming systems were wrapped around the phantom in order to obtain images in fluoroscopy, and to measure the absorbed and scattered radiation dose. A dosimeter, endovascular catheters, and stents were placed into a phantom. The other dosimeter was placed outside of a C-arm table, at the operator's and anesthesiologist's locations.

RESULTS

Most of the insulating covers did not cause artifacts in the fluoroscopy and led to a significant decrease in both the absorbed and scattered radiation dose. The highest decrease in the absorbed dose was observed with metalized foil (- 2.09%; p = 0.001) and in the scattered dose with Helios cover (- 55%; p < 0.001). Only one heating system (Ready Heat combined with Hypothermia Prevention and Management Kit cover) caused significant artifacts and increased radiation up to 99% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Thermal insulation may be maintained during X-ray-guided emergency endovascular procedures in trauma victims. Self-heating blankets should be replaced with another warming system.