1
|
Elmi N, McEvoy D, McInnes MDF, Alabousi M, Hecht EM, Luk L, Asghar S, Jajodia A, de Carvalho TL, Warnica WJ, Zha N, Ullah S, van der Pol CB. Percentage of Pancreatic Cysts on MRI With a Pancreatic Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 60:1063-1075. [PMID: 38053468 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are frequent on MRI and are thought to be associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) necessitating long-term surveillance based on older studies suffering from selection bias. PURPOSE To establish the percentage of patients with PCLs on MRI with a present or future PDAC. STUDY TYPE Systematic review, meta-analysis. POPULATION Adults with PCLs on MRI and a present or future diagnosis of PDAC were eligible. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were searched to April 2022 (PROSPERO:CRD42022320502). Studies limited to PCLs not requiring surveillance, <100 patients, or those with a history/genetic risk of PDAC were excluded. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE ≥1.5 T with ≥1 T2-weighted sequence. ASSESSMENT Two investigators extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by a third. QUADAS-2 assessed bias. PDAC was diagnosed using a composite reference standard. STATISTICAL TESTS A meta-analysis of proportions was performed at the patient-level with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS Eight studies with 1289 patients contributed to the percentage of patients with a present diagnosis of PDAC, and 10 studies with 3422 patients to the percentage with a future diagnosis. Of patients with PCLs on MRI, 14.8% (95% CI 2.4-34.9) had a PDAC at initial MRI, which decreased to 6.0% (2.2-11.3) for studies at low risk of bias. For patients without PDAC on initial MRI, 2.0% (1.1-3.2) developed PDAC during surveillance, similar for low risk of bias studies at 1.9% (0.7-3.6), with no clear trend of increased PDAC for longer surveillance durations. For patients without worrisome features or high-risk stigmata, 0.9% (0.1-2.2) developed PDAC during surveillance. Of 10, eight studies had a median surveillance ≥3 years (range 3-157 months). Sources of bias included retrospectively limiting PCLs to those with histopathology and inconsistent surveillance protocols. DATA CONCLUSION A low percentage of patients with PCLs on MRI develop PDAC while on surveillance. The first MRI revealing a PCL should be scrutinized for PDAC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nika Elmi
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David McEvoy
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew D F McInnes
- Department of Radiology and Epidemiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital-Civic Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mostafa Alabousi
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth M Hecht
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lyndon Luk
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sunna Asghar
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ankush Jajodia
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tiago Lins de Carvalho
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William J Warnica
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nanxi Zha
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sadaf Ullah
- Library Services, Unity Health Toronto St. Michael's Hospital, East Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian B van der Pol
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gardner TB, Park WG, Allen PJ. Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cysts. Gastroenterology 2024; 167:454-468. [PMID: 38442782 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
As pancreatic cyst incidence rises, likely due to the ubiquitous increase in cross-sectional imaging, their management presents multiple challenges for both the practitioner and patient. It is critical that all pancreatic cysts are appropriately characterized, as treatment decisions depend on an accurate diagnosis. Diagnostic modalities such as cytology, biopsy, and cyst fluid biomarkers allow for definitive diagnosis of virtually all lesions. Some cysts, such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasms, have malignant potential and must be surveyed. Other cysts, such as serous cystadenomas and pancreatic fluid collections, do not have malignant potential. Surveillance strategies vary widely depending on cyst type and size and while multiple medical societies advocate surveillance, their published surveillance guidelines are heterogenous. Cysts with high-risk stigmata or worrisome features are usually resected, depending on the patient's surgical fitness. In patients unfit for resection, newer endoscopic ablative techniques are advocated. Controversial aspects regarding cyst management include whether surveillance can be stopped, how surveillance should be performed, and the extensive financial burden cyst management places on the health care system. Further study into the natural history of cystic lesions, including definitive determination of the rate of malignant transformation for each cyst type, is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy B Gardner
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
| | - Walter G Park
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Peter J Allen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Di Primio G, Boyd GJ, Fung CI, Hurrell C, Brahm GL, Bird JR, Co SJ, Kirkpatrick IDC. Recommendations for the Management of Incidental Musculoskeletal Findings on MRI and CT. Can Assoc Radiol J 2023; 74:514-525. [PMID: 36710521 DOI: 10.1177/08465371231152151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Incidental Findings Working Group consists of both academic subspeciality and general radiologists tasked with either adapting American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines to meet the needs of Canadian radiologists or authoring new guidelines where appropriate. In this case, entirely new guidelines to deal with incidental musculoskeletal findings that may be encountered on thoracoabdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were drafted, focussing on which findings should prompt recommendations for further workup. These recommendations discuss how to deal with incidental marrow changes, focal bone lesions, abnormalities of the pubic symphysis and sacroiliac joints, fatty soft tissue masses, manifestations of renal osteodystrophy and finally discuss opportunistic osteoporosis evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Di Primio
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital (Halton Health Care), Oakville, ON, Canada
| | - Gordon J Boyd
- Department of Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Christopher I Fung
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Casey Hurrell
- Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Gary L Brahm
- Department of Medical Imaging, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffery R Bird
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Steven J Co
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Iain D C Kirkpatrick
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alwahbi O, Ghumman Z, van der Pol CB, Patlas M, Gopee-Ramanan P. Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Review of the Current State of Diagnosis and Surveillance. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022:8465371221130524. [PMID: 36220377 DOI: 10.1177/08465371221130524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are both common and often incidental. These encompass a range of pathologies with varying degrees of concern for malignancy. Although establishing a diagnosis is helpful for determining malignant potential, many PCLs are either too small to characterize or demonstrate nonspecific morphologic features. The most salient modalities involved in diagnosis and surveillance are magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector computerized tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound. Fine needle aspiration has a role in conjunction with molecular markers as a diagnostic tool, particularly for identifying malignant lesions. Although several major consensus guidelines exist internationally, there remains uncertainty in establishing the strength of the association between all PCLs and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and in showing a benefit from extended periods of imaging surveillance. No consensus exists between the major guidelines, particularly regarding surveillance duration, frequency, or endpoints. This review paper discusses PCL subtypes, diagnosis, and compares the major consensus guidelines with considerations for local adaptability along with questions regarding current and future priorities for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Alwahbi
- Department of Radiology, 62703McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (HSC - 3N26), Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Zonia Ghumman
- Department of Radiology, 62703McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (HSC - 3N26), Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Christian B van der Pol
- Department of Radiology, 62703McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (HSC - 3N26), Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Patlas
- Department of Radiology, 62703McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (HSC - 3N26), Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Prasaanthan Gopee-Ramanan
- Department of Radiology, 62703McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (HSC - 3N26), Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alwahbi O, Larocque N, Kulkarni A, Gopee-Ramanan PP, Ghumman Z, Sarkar R, Kagoma Y, Alabousi A, Tsai S, Wat J, McInnes M, van der Pol CB. Pancreatic Cystic Lesions on MRI: What Is The Likelihood of a Present or Future Diagnosis of Pancreatic Carcinoma? J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 57:1567-1575. [PMID: 36151888 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are followed for years due to older and likely biased works demonstrating a strong association with pancreatic carcinoma; more recent data are needed clarifying this relationship. PURPOSE To determine the association between PCLs on MRI and a synchronous or future diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. STUDY TYPE Single-center retrospective cohort. POPULATION A total of 192 patients (111 female, 58%) with median age 66 years (range 26-87 years) with PCLs on abdominal MRI from 2011 to 2016. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES 1.5 T and 3 T, including T2 WI, T1 WI, diffusion weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1 WI. ASSESSMENT Each PCL was reviewed independently by 2 of 10 fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists. Fukuoka guideline worrisome features and high-risk stigmata were evaluated. Follow-up imaging and clinical notes were reviewed within a system that captures pancreatic carcinoma for the region, for a median follow-up of 67 months (interquartile range: 43-88 months). STATISTICAL TESTS Pancreatic carcinoma prevalence and incidence rate for future carcinoma with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Fisher exact test, logistic regression with odds ratios (OR) and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to assess PCL morphologic features with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test used to assess for normality. P < 0.05 defined statistical significance. RESULTS The prevalence of pancreatic carcinoma on initial MRI showing a PCL was 2.4% (95% CI: 0.9%, 5.2%). Thickened/enhancing cyst wall was associated with pancreatic carcinoma, OR 52 (95% CI: 4.5, 1203). Of 189 patients with a PCL but without pancreatic carcinoma at the time of initial MRI, one developed high-grade dysplasia and none developed invasive carcinoma for an incidence rate of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.02, 5.43) and 0 (95% CI: 0, 3.59) cases per 1000 person-years, respectively. DATA CONCLUSION A low percentage of patients with a PCL on MRI had a pancreatic carcinoma at the time of initial evaluation and none developed carcinoma over a median 67 months of follow-up. EVIDENCE LEVEL 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Alwahbi
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha Larocque
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ameya Kulkarni
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Prasaanthan Prasa Gopee-Ramanan
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zonia Ghumman
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahul Sarkar
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yoan Kagoma
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abdullah Alabousi
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott Tsai
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Josephine Wat
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew McInnes
- Department of Radiology and Epidemiology, University of Ottawa, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian B van der Pol
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patlas MN. Incidental Pancreatic Findings: When to Follow Up? Can Assoc Radiol J 2021; 73:283-284. [PMID: 34313450 DOI: 10.1177/08465371211031189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael N Patlas
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|