Zonisamide in pediatric epilepsy: review of the Japanese experience

What are the considerations when initiating treatment for epilepsy in children?

INTRODUCTION

There is a very wide spectrum of epilepsies and developmental and epileptic encephalopathies that affect children, from self-limited forms, not necessarily requiring treatment, to severe drug-resistant ones.

AREAS COVERED

In this perspective, the authors discuss the main factors to consider before drug prescription in children, considering the most recent clinical research, including age, seizure type, epilepsy syndrome, etiology, efficacy and safety profile, comorbidities, gender, available formulations, costs and drug coverage, and regulatory issues. The literature search was conducted through a PubMed search on antiseizure medications for patients aged 0-18, with respect to each of the aforementioned factors, and by checking the reference lists of relevant papers.

EXPERT OPINION

The most expanding field of research and innovation for clinical practice is precision medicine, which addresses the holistic treatment of genetic epilepsies and developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. It achieves this by addressing their detrimental effects on synapses, neurotransmission, and cellular signaling pathways with the double aim to treat seizures and to rescue neurodevelopmental trajectories, but also the issue of adverse events and drug resistance through pharmacogenomics.

Effectiveness of zonisamide in childhood refractory epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Zonisamide (ZNS) is a new generation antiepileptic drug (AED) used in refractory epilepsy. This study assessed the effectiveness and reliability of ZNS in childhood refractory epilepsy.

METHOD

Sixty-eight epilepsy patients who were followed up in the paediatric neurology clinic, between 2013 and 2019, and in whom add-on therapy ZNS had been added as their seizures had continued despite multiple drugs being used, were included in this retrospective study. Their demographic findings, seizure aetiology, pre-treatment and post-treatment electroencephalography findings, treatment responses and any side effects of the drugs given were assessed in these patients.

RESULTS

There were 46 (67.6%) patients in the refractory generalized epilepsy (RGE) group using multiple AEDs and 22 (32.35%) patients in the refractory focal epilepsy (RFE) group. Of these patients, 12 (17.65%) were being followed up for idiopathic epilepsy and 8 (11.76%) were being followed up for epilepsy of unknown aetiology. Twenty-two (32.36%) patients were followed up for structural abnormality, 8 patients (11.77%) were followed up for genetic disease, 4 patients (5.88%) were followed up for infectious sequel, 14 patients (20.59%) were followed up for metabolic reasons. In the RGE group, a more than 50% reduction was found in the seizures of 26 (56.5%) patients, while the seizures of 7 (15.2%) patients were found to have terminated completely. In the RFE group, a more than 50% reduction was found in the seizures of 19 (86.4%) patients, while the seizures of 2 (9.1%) patients were found to have terminated completely. The termination or a more than 50% reduction in seizures in 4 of the 6 patients followed up for a diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) was significant.

CONCLUSION

ZNS is an effective and reliable option as an add-on therapy in paediatric refractory epilepsy, especially in focal epilepsy. It can also be considered for treatment in TSC patients.

Zonisamide Therapy for Patients With Paroxysmal Kinesigenic Dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

We evaluated zonisamide therapy in patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD).

METHODS

We analyzed zonisamide therapy in 17 patients with PKD at Saitama Children's Medical Center between November 1994 and April 2020. We collected information regarding family history, previous history, age at onset, age at zonisamide commencement, dyskinesia characteristics, brain magnetic resonance imaging, interictal electroencephalography, treatment lag, zonisamide efficacy, zonisamide dose, serum zonisamide concentration, and adverse effects. We evaluated PKD frequency at six months after zonisamide therapy commencement.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age at zonisamide therapy commencement was 12.8 (9.4 to 16.3) years. Zonisamide therapy was effective in 13 of 14 (92.9%) patients: complete remission for more than three months after zonisamide therapy (n = 7), decreased dyskinesia frequency by more than 90% (n = 4), dyskinesia frequency by 75% to 90% (n = 2), and no change of dyskinesia frequency (n = 1). The initial and maintenance zonisamide doses were 2.0 (1.4 to 3.8) and 2.0 (1.5 to 5.9) mg/kg/day, respectively. The median duration between zonisamide therapy commencement and dyskinesia decrease or cessation was 4 (1 to 60) days: 10 of 14 (71.4%) patients responded to zonisamide within one week after zonisamide therapy commencement. Regarding adverse effects, two patients experienced somnolence and one developed reduced perspiration.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that zonisamide monotherapy is effective for patients with PKD as a first-line treatment. We can evaluate the efficacy of zonisamide therapy within one week. Because zonisamide lacks the enzyme-inducing effects of carbamazepine and phenytoin, it may be useful for PKD treatment.

Pharmacotherapy for Focal Seizures in Children and Adolescents

Focal-onset seizures are among the most common forms of seizures in children and adolescents and can be caused by a wide diversity of acquired or genetic etiologies. Despite the increasing array of antiseizure drugs available, treatment of focal-onset seizures in this population remains problematic, with as many as one-third of children having seizures refractory to medications. This review discusses contemporary concepts in focal seizure classification and pathophysiology and describes the antiseizure medications most commonly chosen for this age group. As antiseizure drug efficacy is comparable in children and adults, here we focus on pharmacokinetic aspects, drug-drug interactions, and side effect profiles. Finally, we provide some suggestions for choosing the optimal medication for the appropriate patient.

Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interaction of Antiepileptic Drugs in Children and Adolescents

Selecting the most appropriate antiepileptic drug (AED) or combination of drugs for each patient and identifying the most suitable therapeutic regimen for their needs is increasingly challenging, especially among pediatric populations. In fact, the pharmacokinetics of several drugs vary widely in children with epilepsy because of age-related factors, which can influence the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of the pharmacological agent. In addition, individual factors, such as seizure type, associated comorbidities, individual pharmacokinetics, and potential drug interactions, may contribute to large fluctuations in serum drug concentrations and, therefore, clinical response. Therapeutic drug concentration monitoring (TDM) is an essential tool to deal with this complexity, enabling the definition of individual therapeutic concentrations and adaptive control of dosing to minimize drug interactions and prevent loss of efficacy or toxicity. Moreover, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling integrated with dashboard systems have recently been tested in antiepileptic therapy, although more clinical trials are required to support their use in clinical practice. We review the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and safety/tolerability profiles of the main AEDs currently used in children and adolescents, paying particular regard to issues of relevance when treating this patient population. Indications for TDM are provided for each AED as useful support to the clinical management of pediatric patients with epilepsy by optimizing pharmacological therapy.

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects of anti-epileptic drugs in adolescents and children with epilepsy

PURPOSE

The objective of the study was to compare the psychiatric and behavioral side effect (PBSE) profiles of both older and newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in children and adolescent patients with epilepsy.

METHOD

We used logistic regression analysis to test the correlation between 83 non-AED/patient related potential predictor variables and the rate of PBSE. We then compared for each AED the rate of PBSEs and the rate of PBSEs that led to intolerability (IPBSE) while controlling for non-AED predictors of PBSEs.

RESULTS

922 patients (≤18 years old) were included in our study. PBSEs and IPBSEs occurred in 13.8% and 11.2% of patients, respectively. Overall, a history of psychiatric condition, absence seizures, intractable epilepsy, and frontal lobe epilepsy were significantly associated with increased PBSE rates. Levetiracetam (LEV) had the greatest PBSE rate (16.2%). This was significantly higher compared to other AEDs. LEV was also significantly associated with a high rate of IPBSEs (13.4%) and dose-decrease rates due to IPBSE (6.7%). Zonisamide (ZNS) was associated with significantly higher cessation rate due to IPBSE (9.1%) compared to other AEDs.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a history of psychiatric condition, absence seizures, intractable epilepsy, or frontal lobe epilepsy are more likely to develop PBSE. PBSEs appear to occur more frequently in adolescent and children patients taking LEV compared to other AEDs. LEV-attributed PBSEs are more likely to be associated with intolerability and subsequent decrease in dose. The rate of ZNS-attributed IPBSEs is more likely to be associated with complete cessation of AED.

Recent advances in the pharmacotherapy of infantile spasms

Adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), oral corticosteroids and vigabatrin are now first-line treatments for infantile spasms in the US and Europe. There is now increased knowledge regarding the role of ACTH, corticosteroids and vigabatrin (e.g. efficacy, doses, side effects, treatment in specific aetiological subtypes of infantile spasms), and other antiepileptic drugs (i.e. topiramate, valproate, zonisamide, sulthiame, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, pyridoxine, ganaxolone), as well as adjunctive flunarizine and novel drugs not yet in clinical use for infantile spasms (i.e. pulse rapamycin and melanocortin receptor agonists). The existence of a latent period, weeks to months following a precipitating brain insult, raises the possibility of preventive interventions. Recent experimental data emerging from animal models of infantile spasms have provided optimism that new and innovative treatments can be developed, and knowledge that drug treatment can affect long-term cognitive outcome is increasing. The aim of this article is to review recent developments in the pharmacotherapy of infantile spasms and to highlight the practical implications of the latest research.

Zonisamide: newer antiepileptic agent with multiple mechanisms of action

Zonisamide (Zonegran, Eisai, Inc.) is a broad spectrum antiepileptic drug indicated for use as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial seizures. Zonisamide has multiple mechanisms of action, which may explain widespread reports of its utility in focal epilepsy and generalized epilepsy, and for nonseizure disorders such as headache and neuropathic pain. Zonisamide has been available in Japan since 1989 and became available in the USA in 2002. The rights to this drug in North America and Europe were recently acquired by Eisai Co. A review of the chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, potential mechanisms of action, efficacy in seizure and nonseizure disorders, and tolerability was therefore thought to be timely.

Treatment of infantile spasms

BACKGROUND

Infantile spasms (West's Syndrome) is a syndrome that includes a peculiar type of epileptic seizure-the spasms-and an electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormality often called hypsarrhythmia. Psychomotor retardation is frequently found at follow-up. Approximately two-thirds of affected infants will have a detectable underlying neurological abnormality, but still little is known about the pathophysiological basis for infantile spasms, and treatment remains problematic.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of single pharmaceutical therapies used to treat infantile spasms in terms of control of the spasms, resolution of the EEG, relapse rates, psychomotor development, subsequent epilepsy, side effects, and mortality.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify published data, we searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register (October 2012), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 9), MEDLINE (1946 to September Week 4, 2012), EMBASE (1980 to March 2003), and the reference lists of all retrieved articles.To identify unpublished data, we searched the ISRCTN Register (www.controlled-trials.com), corresponded with colleagues and drug companies, and made requests at international conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the administration of drug therapy to patients with infantile spasms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection from all relevant publications was independently undertaken by three review authors (before 2010) or by two review authors using a standard proforma. Analysis included assessment of study quality and a search for sources of heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 16 small RCTs (fewer than 100 patients enrolled) and 2 larger RCTs (more than 100 patients enrolled). These 18 studies looked at a total of 916 patients treated with a total of 12 different pharmaceutical agents. Overall methodology of the studies was poor, in part because of ethical dilemmas such as giving placebo injections to children. Two studies showed that placebo was not as good as active treatment in resolving the spasms. The strongest evidence suggested that hormonal treatment (prednisolone or tetracosactide depot) leads to resolution of spasms faster and in more infants than does vigabatrin. Responses without subsequent relapse may be no different. The same study suggests that hormonal treatments might improve the long-term developmental outcome compared with vigabatrin in infants not found to have an underlying cause for their infantile spasms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date, few well-designed RCTs have considered the treatment of infantile spasms, and the numbers of patients enrolled have been small. In the majority, methodology has been poor, hence it is not clear which treatment is optimal in the treatment of this epilepsy syndrome. Hormonal treatment resolves spasms in more infants than vigabatrin, but this may or may not translate into better long-term outcomes. If prednisolone or vigabatrin is used, high dosage is recommended. Vigabatrin may be the treatment of choice in tuberous sclerosis. Resolution of the EEG features may be important, but this has not been proven. Further research using large studies with robust methodology is required.

Role of oxidative stress in epileptic seizures

Oxidative stress resulting from excessive free-radical release is likely implicated in the initiation and progression of epilepsy. Therefore, antioxidant therapies aimed at reducing oxidative stress have received considerable attention in epilepsy treatment. However, much evidence suggests that oxidative stress does not always have the same pattern in all seizures models. Thus, this review provides an overview aimed at achieving a better understanding of this issue. We summarize work regarding seizure models (i.e., genetic rat models, kainic acid, pilocarpine, pentylenetetrazol, and trimethyltin), oxidative stress as an etiologic factor in epileptic seizures (i.e., impairment of antioxidant systems, mitochondrial dysfunction, involvement of redox-active metals, arachidonic acid pathway activation, and aging), and antioxidant strategies for seizure treatment. Combined, this review highlights pharmacological mechanisms associated with oxidative stress in epileptic seizures and the potential for neuroprotection in epilepsy that targets oxidative stress and is supported by effective antioxidant treatment.

Management of seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is an epilepsy syndrome that begins in childhood (between 1 and 8 years of age), worsens during latency and persists frequently into adulthood, is refractory to antiepileptic medications, and results in cognitive decline and behavioral problems in affected individuals. Seizure types consist primarily of axial tonic, atonic, and atypical absence; nocturnal tonic seizures are the most common seizure pattern in this population, but often are not one of the initial seizure patterns. Some patients also have myoclonic seizures; this seizure pattern is less frequent than the three preceding types. Although there are some cases that are cryptogenic, most are symptomatic, arising during prenatal and perinatal periods from intrauterine infections, and vascular insults to the brain. Examples of causes of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome include migrational abnormalities of the brain, late effects of CNS infections, certain genetic disorders such as tuberous sclerosis, and inherited metabolic disorders. The difficulty early in the course of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is distinguishing this diagnosis from severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (Dravet syndrome) or from myoclonic-astatic epilepsy (Doose syndrome), as the seizure patterns in these three syndromes may overlap at the onset. EEG is a helpful diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, usually demonstrating high voltage, bifrontal 1.5-2.5 Hz spike and wave complexes interictally, and attenuation with paroxysmal fast activity (10-13 Hz) during the ictal phase. Treatment options for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome have been less than optimal. In recent years, several drugs have been tested and approved for the treatment of this syndrome; these include felbamate, lamotrigine, topiramate, and rufinamide. The long-term outcome does not appear to be any better with the newer antiepileptic drugs than when using earlier prescribed antiepileptic drugs or polytherapy. Treatment options other than antiepileptic drugs include a ketogenic diet, vagus nerve stimulation, and corpus callosotomy. Long-term outcome of these patients relative to seizure control and cognition is poor. Most develop moderate intellectual disability within a few years of onset of the syndrome. Many develop behavioral problems with inattention, hyperactivity, and aggression.

Infantile spasms: little seizures, BIG consequences

Infantile spasms is one of the "catastrophic childhood epilepsies" because of the difficulty in controlling seizures and the association with mental retardation. However, early recognition, a careful diagnostic evaluation, and proper treatment may allow some children to attain seizure control and to achieve a normal, or at least much improved, level of development. Thus, there is the opportunity to have an important impact in the lives of these unfortunate children and their families.

The safety and tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs in children and adolescents

The newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) provide more therapeutic options and overall improved safety and tolerability for patients. To provide the best care, physicians must be familiar with the latest tolerability and safety data. This is particularly true in children, given there are relatively fewer studies examining the effects of AEDs in children compared with adults. Since we now have significant paediatric literature on each of these agents, we provide a comprehensive and current literature review of the newer AEDs, focusing on safety and tolerability data in children and adolescents. Because the safety profiles in children differ from those in adults, familiarity with this literature is important for child neurologists and other paediatric caregivers. We have organized the data by organ system for each AED for easier reference.

Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive therapy with zonisamide in childhood intractable epilepsy

PURPOSE

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of zonisamide (ZNS) adjunctive therapy in children with intractable epilepsy to existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

A clinical retrospective study was performed from 2003 to 2005 at two tertiary epilepsy centers. We reviewed the data from 163 children (107 boys and 56 girls) who experienced more than four seizures per month, whose seizures were intractable to an initial 2 or more AEDs, and could be followed up for at least 6months after ZNS adjunctive therapy initiation. Efficacy was estimated by seizure reduction rate according to seizure types including infantile spasms, and adverse events were also measured.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (48.5%) out of 163 patients experienced a reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50%, and 25 patients (15.3%) became seizure-free. The rate of seizure reduction greater than 50% in children with partial seizures was 40.5% (17/42) and in children with generalized seizures was 51.2% (62/121). Of 36 patients who manifested mainly myoclonic seizures, 20 patients (55.6%) showed a seizure reduction of more than 50% and 9 patients (25.0%) were seizure-free. Mean maintenance dosage of drug was 8.2mg/kg/day (range 5.0-16.0mg/kg/day). Adverse events were documented in 15 children (9.2%), including somnolence (8 patients), fatigue, and anorexia, but all were transient and successfully managed. One patient discontinued ZNS therapy due to acute pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION

ZNS adjunctive therapy is an effective and safe treatment in various childhood intractable epilepsy.

Open-label, long-term safety study of zonisamide administered to children and adolescents with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Zonisamide is licensed in the EU and USA for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults but there are few data about its use in children.

AIMS

To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of zonisamide in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Zonisamide-naïve patients (n=109, aged 3-15 years, weight >or=12.5 kg) with a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy (>or=4 seizures/month, receiving 1-2 antiepileptic drugs [AEDs] daily) received zonisamide once or twice daily in an open-label trial. The starting dose was 1mg/kg/day, increased by 2 mg/kg/day every 1-2 weeks at the investigator's discretion to an initial maximum of 12 mg/kg/day. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) was the primary safety measure. Efficacy was measured via the reductions in seizure frequency and via investigator- and carer-rated global assessment ratings.

RESULTS

The mean dose received was 8.5 mg/kg/day. Of the 109 children, 52 (48%) completed 15 months' treatment. Treatment-related AEs, mostly mild-to-moderate in severity, were reported by 58 patients. Seven patients discontinued due to treatment-related AEs. Serious AEs (pancreatitis, decreased sweating, and vertigo) were reported by three patients. A significant (p=0.033) median reduction in 'all seizure' frequency of 2.60 seizures per week was observed. Additionally, a significant (p=0.029) median reduction of 1.80 seizures/week in 'complex partial' seizures was reported. Improvements in investigator- and carer-rated global assessments were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Zonisamide treatment was generally well tolerated and was associated with significant reductions in seizure frequency in this pediatric population with a variety of both partial and generalized medically refractory epilepsy syndromes.

Treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: overview and recent findings

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a rare, age-related syndrome, characterized by multiple seizure types, a specific electro-encephalographic pattern, and mental regression. However, published data on the etiology, evolution, and therapeutic approach of LGS are contradictory, partly because the precise definition of LGS used in the literature varies. In the most recent classification, LGS belongs to the epileptic encephalopathies and is highly refractory to all antiepileptic drugs. Numerous treatments, medical and non-medical, have been proposed and results mostly from open studies or case series have been published. Sometimes, patients with LGS are included in a more global group of patients with refractory epilepsy. Only 6 randomized double-blind controlled trials of medical treatments, which included patients with LGS, have been published. Overall, treatment is rarely effective and the final prognosis remains poor in spite of new therapeutic strategies. Co-morbidities need specific treatment. This paper summarizes the definition, diagnosis and therapeutic approach to LGS, including not only recognized antiepileptic drugs, but also "off label" medications, immune therapy, diet, surgery and some perspectives for the future.

Use of second-generation antiepileptic drugs in the pediatric population

Epilepsy is common in the pediatric population. Nine second-generation antiepileptic drugs have been approved in the US for use in epilepsy over the past 15 years: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, zonisamide, and pregabalin. Their use in pediatric patients is fairly widespread, despite most of these agents not having US FDA indications for use. Felbamate and gabapentin were the first two second-generation antiepileptic drugs to be approved in the US. Felbamate use has been limited because of the occurrence of hepatotoxicity and aplastic anemia. Although gabapentin is a fairly well tolerated antiepileptic drug, its use has also been limited as a result of inconsistent efficacy and concern about seizure exacerbation. Lamotrigine and topiramate are broad-spectrum antiepileptic drugs with efficacy in a wide variety of seizure types. Both agents have some tolerability concerns: rash with lamotrigine and neuropsychiatric events with topiramate. There are very little data on tiagabine use in children, but this agent appears to be effective and to have a good tolerability profile. Levetiracetam is a second-generation antiepileptic agent that is available intravenously. Considering its good efficacy, fast onset of action, and low incidence of serious adverse effects, its use in the acute setting could potentially increase. Oxcarbazepine and zonisamide have been relatively well studied in pediatric seizure patients, including use as monotherapy. Both agents have demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability for patients as young as 1 month old. Vigabatrin and rufinamide are currently not available in the US, but have been shown to have some success in other countries. Pregabalin is the newest antiepileptic agent, but lacks pediatric data currently.

Treatment of infantile spasms

BACKGROUND

Infantile spasms (West's Syndrome) is a syndrome which includes a peculiar type of epileptic seizure, the spasms, and an electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormality often called hypsarrhythmia. Psychomotor retardation is frequently found at follow up. Approximately two thirds of affected infants will have a detectable underlying neurological abnormality, but still little is known about the pathophysiological basis for infantile spasms and treatment remains problematic.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of single pharmaceutical therapies used to treat infantile spasms in terms of control of the spasms, resolution of the EEG, relapse rates, psychomotor development, subsequent epilepsy, side effects, and mortality.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Published data: Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of all retrieved articles.Unpublished data: ISRCTN Register (www.controlled-trials.com), correspondence with colleagues and drug companies, and requests at international conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of the administration of drug therapy to patients with infantile spasms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection from all relevant publications was independently undertaken by three review authors using a standard proforma. Analysis included assessment of study quality and looking for sources of heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 12 small RCTs (less than 60 patients enrolled) and two larger RCT (more than 100 patients enrolled). These 14 studies looked at a total of 681 patients treated with a total of nine different pharmaceutical agents. Overall methodology of the studies was poor, partly because of ethical dilemmas such as giving placebo injections to children. Two studies showed that placebo was not as good as active treatment in resolving the spasms. The strongest evidence suggested that hormonal treatment leads to resolution of spasms faster and in more infants than does vigabatrin. Responses without subsequent relapse may be no different. The same study suggests that hormonal treatments (prednisolone or tetracosactide) might improve the long-term developmental outcome compared with vigabatrin in infants not found to have an underlying cause for their infantile spasms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date, there have been few well-designed RCTs that considered the treatment of infantile spasms, and the numbers of patients enrolled have been small. Overall methodology has been poor, hence it is not clear which treatment is optimal in the treatment of this epilepsy syndrome. Hormonal treatment resolves spasms in more infants than vigabatrin but this may or may not translate into a better long-term outcome. If prednisone or vigabatrin are used then high dosage is recommended. Vigabatrin may be the treatment of choice in tuberous sclerosis. Resolution of the EEG features may be important but this has not been proven. Further research using large studies with robust methodology is still required.

New antiepileptic drugs in pediatric epilepsy

New antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), introduced since 1993, provide more diverse options in the treatment of epilepsy. Despite the equivalent efficacy and better tolerability of these drugs, more than 25% of patients remain refractory to treatment. Moreover, the issues for pediatric patients are different from those for adults, and have not been addressed in the development and application of the new AEDs. Recently published evidence-based treatment guidelines have helped physicians to choose the most reasonable AED, although they cannot fully endorse new AEDs because of the lack of well-designed, randomized controlled trials. We review the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, adverse reactions, efficacy, and tolerability of eight new AEDs (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide), focusing on currently available treatment guidelines and expert opinions regarding pediatric epilepsy.

Zonisamide: review of pharmacology, clinical efficacy, tolerability, and safety

BACKGROUND

Zonisamide (ZNS), a sulphonamide derivative, is a new-generation anticonvulsant with multiple potential mechanisms that contribute to its antiepileptic efficacy and may also explain its as yet incompletely assessed utility for non-seizure disorders such as headaches, neuropathic pain, and weight loss.

OBJECTIVE

A review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, evidence for efficacy in different seizure types and non-seizure conditions, adverse effects, and tolerability of ZNS is presented.

METHODS

A review of all manuscripts published in the English literature on ZNS was performed in preparing this manuscript.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

ZNS has a broad label for use in Japan, while the regulatory bodies in the USA and Europe have approved it for use only as an adjunctive therapy for partial seizures in adults. It has favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, proven efficacy in seizure disorders, and is well tolerated in long-term use.

Clinical efficacy of zonisamide in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Korean multicentric experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of zonisamide (ZNS) as long-term adjunctive therapy in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS).

METHOD

We evaluated the seizure frequency, cognitive outcomes, and side effects of 62 LGS patients maintained on ZNS for at least 12 months in three tertiary centers.

RESULTS

Of the 62 LGS patients maintained on ZNS, 3 (4.8%) had 100% seizure control; 14 (22.6%) had >75% to <100% reduction in seizure frequency; 15 (24.2%) had >50% to <75% reduction in seizure frequency; 6 (9.7%) had >0% to <50% reduction in seizure frequency, and 24 (38.7%) had no seizure reduction. Seizure outcomes were not related to seizure types or etiologies. Adverse events included somnolence and anorexia, but all were transient and successfully managed by careful follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that adjunctive treatment with ZNS is safe and effective in pediatric LGS patients.

Long-term use of zonisamide in refractory childhood-onset epilepsy

This open label study examined the long-term efficacy and safety of zonisamide as adjunctive therapy in mentally retarded and multiple-handicapped patients with severe childhood-onset epilepsy. The study included 24 patients (mean age 12.5 years, range 2-40 years) which had different severe epilepsy syndromes (75% focal, 12.5% generalized, 12.5% refractory status epilepticus) refractory to at least 6 (median 10) anti-epileptic drugs. All patients were followed for at least 18 months after beginning of zonisamide treatment. Mean duration of zonisamide therapy was 55 weeks (range 5-168 weeks) and mean maintenance dosage was 7.7 mg/kg/day (range: 4-16 mg/kg/day). The patients received an average of 1.9 (range 1-3) concomitant antiepileptic drugs. The initial response rate defined as a > or =50% reduction of seizure frequency after 8 weeks was 58.3% (14 of 24 patients). Four of 14 initial responders developed loss of efficacy during long-term treatment. The retention rate after 18 months was 41.7% (10 of 24 patients). One patient (4.2%) became completely seizure-free after initiation of zonisamide treatment and remained seizure-free for the entire observation period of 18 months. Overall, zonisamide was well tolerated. Side effects were observed in 46% of patients and were mild to moderate. They mostly occurred during titration and subsided in maintenance dosing. Only in two patients (8.3%) zonisamide therapy was discontinued due to side effects (loss of appetite). No serious side effects were observed. These results are similar to the findings of Japanese studies suggesting that long-term use of adjunctive zonisamide therapy may be beneficial for treating mentally retarded, multiple handicapped patients with highly refractory childhood-onset epilepsy.

What is epilepsy? Clinical perspectives in the diagnosis and treatment

SUMMARY

The CINNR International Conference, "An Overview of Epilepsy Research: What, Where, When, and Why?," was designed to introduce epilepsy to the nonclinician interested in epilepsy research. This article discusses the clinical aspects of epilepsy, defines clinical terms associated with epilepsy and seizure disorders, and outlines the scope of the clinical problem and the issues that need clarification from a clinical perspective. Most importantly, it is hoped that this article will put a human face on this common disease.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive zonisamide therapy for refractory partial seizures

An approach to the selection of appropriate antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for inclusion in polytherapy is to take into account both the efficacy of a drug and also its mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic profile. The AED zonisamide is licensed in Europe and the USA for use as adjunctive therapy in adult patients with partial onset epilepsy. Four pivotal clinical studies in patients with refractory partial seizures demonstrated that zonisamide as an add-on was most effective at doses of >or=300 mg/day, with responder rates (>or=50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency) ranging from 28 to 47% for all seizures. In addition, zonisamide has a unique combination of multiple mechanisms of action that are potentially complementary with concomitant AEDs. Zonisamide has no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of other commonly used AEDs, however, co-administration with cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducers or inhibitors may change zonisamide's pharmacokinetic profile. Zonisamide is well tolerated with the majority of adverse events being mild-to-moderate and generally manageable. The tolerability of zonisamide has also been shown to improve with slower drug titration and duration of drug treatment. These characteristics suggest that zonisamide may be suitable as a key adjunct in rational polytherapy.

Antiepileptic drug treatment in children

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders of childhood, and antiepileptic drugs represent the main component of its treatment. The current emphasis in epilepsy treatment is to improve quality of life, not only by suppressing seizure, but also by minimizing the side effects of medications. The last 15 years have been characterized by significant advances in the development of new agents that have helped us to get closer to this goal. Knowledge of the essential properties, key indications and interactions of each antiepileptic drug will help to optimize efficacy and reduce adverse reactions. Age is also a determining factor of the epilepsy phenotype and its treatment. This review addresses the principles of pediatric epilepsy treatment, summarizes the profile of each of the commonly used antiepileptic drugs, and provides a treatment paradigm for particular seizures and epilepsy syndromes of childhood.

Zonisamide - a review of experience and use in partial seizures

Zonisamide is a modern antiepileptic drug (AED) that is distinguished from other AEDs by its unique structure and broad mechanistic profile. Preclinical studies have reported a range of potential mechanisms of action for zonisamide, such as blocking voltage-gated sodium channels, reduction of T-type calcium channel currents, and enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibition, which are indicative of its broad antiseizure effects. Zonisamide has a favorable linear pharmacokinetic profile, a long half-life, and a low incidence of protein-binding interactions with other AEDs. Hepatically metabolized through the cytochrome P450 pathway, zonisamide does not induce its own metabolism or liver enzymes. For more than 2 decades, zonisamide has been extensively used as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial and generalized seizures in pediatric and adult patients in Japan. Zonisamide was approved in the USA in 2000 as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures in adults. With over 2 million patient-years of exposure internationally, zonisamide has demonstrated safety and efficacy against a multitude of epilepsy and seizure types, including both partial and generalized seizures. This review focuses on the experience and use of zonisamide in partial seizures, as well as possible new uses for zonisamide.

Efficacy and safety of zonisamide monotherapy in a cohort of children with epilepsy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zonisamide monotherapy in a cohort of children and adolescents with various types of epilepsy. Retrospective review of charts of our institution from 2001 through 2004 identified 69 children (19 males and 50 females, mean age 13.2 years) with epilepsy on zonisamide monotherapy. Seizure count and side effect profile were maintained during therapy. Sixty-one percent had idiopathic generalized epilepsy, 4% symptomatic generalized epilepsy, and 35% partial-onset epilepsy. Zonisamide was the first-line and second-line monotherapy for 32% and 68% of patients, respectively. The mean duration of follow-up on treatment was 22 months (range 3-48 months). The overall efficacy of zonisamide was 75.4% (> or = 50% seizure frequency reduction: good responders). Sixty-seven percent of good responders became seizure-free. Seventy-nine percent of patients with partial epilepsy and 71% with generalized epilepsy were good responders, of whom 79% and 63% were free of seizure, respectively. Eighteen (26%) patients developed side effects: weight loss (9), cognitive impairment (3), sleepiness (3), dizziness (2), and decreased appetite (1). In seven patients (10%), zonisamide had to be discontinued: four due to side effects and three because of poor seizure control. Zonisamide was demonstrated to be effective as monotherapy in children with epilepsy.

Zonisamide in the management of epilepsy—Japanese experience

Zonisamide (Zonegran), a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) approved in Europe for the adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in adults, has undergone extensive evaluation in pre- and post-marketing double-blind and open-label studies in Japan (where zonisamide is used widely to treat partial and generalised seizures in adults and children). These data indicate that the clinical benefit of zonisamide extends across a range of seizure types and patient ages. In an analysis based on a mixture of controlled and open studies in adults and children with partial seizures, 51-57% responded to zonisamide treatment (achieving >or=50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency). Efficacy extends across a range of generalised seizures and 22-66% of adults and children experiencing tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, myoclonic or absence seizures responded to treatment. Even greater responder rates have been reported when zonisamide was used as monotherapy for partial seizures and generalised seizures in patients refractory to other AEDs or with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Zonisamide is also efficacious in paediatric epilepsy syndromes, including Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, West Syndrome and Ohtahara Syndrome. Across the spectrum of epilepsy syndromes studied, zonisamide is well-tolerated with a low incidence of adverse events, which are generally mild and CNS-related. These data indicate that zonisamide represents a valuable broad-spectrum option for the treatment of epilepsy.

Practical Management Issues for Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsies

The idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) are a group of epilepsies that are genetically determined, have no structural or anatomic cause, and usually begin early in life. Neurologic examination, intelligence, and imaging studies are normal, and EEG shows only epileptiform abnormalities (i.e., no abnormal slow activity or evidence for diffuse encephalopathy). In some IGE, the genetic substrate has been identified, whereas in most, it remains unknown. Depending on the age at onset and predominant seizure type, individual subtypes of IGE (syndromes) are defined. However, overall, there are more similarities than there are differences among the various subtypes, and the IGE are best viewed as a spectrum or continuum of conditions. In general, IGE respond to treatment, with 80-90% becoming fully controlled. However, not all antiepileptic drugs (AED) are equally effective in IGE. Some AED are ill advised because they either do not work or exacerbate seizure types other than generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures, that is, absence and myoclonic seizures. These include carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, gabapentin, and tiagabine. Their use is the main cause of "pseudo-intractability," and at least in the United States where PHT and CBZ are the most commonly used AEDs, patients with IGE are often on inadequate medications. For patients with clear IGE, the drug of choice is generally valproic acid because it effectively controls absence myoclonic seizures and GTC seizures. Second-line drugs (when first-line drugs fail or are not tolerated) may include benzodiazepines, but the use of second-line drugs is evolving rapidly. Some of the newer AEDs are considered broad spectrum, meaning that they work in IGE and focal epilepsies, although the evidence is largely preliminary at this point. These newer AEDs include lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, and zonisamide.

Zonisamide in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Painful diabetic neuropathy is a form of neuropathic pain frequently encountered as a complication of diabetes mellitus types I and II. Pharmacotherapy is one modality of treatment for this distressing and often disabling condition, but there is no medication available that consistently provides adequate pain relief with acceptable safety and tolerability. Tricyclic antidepressants, certain antiepileptic drugs, and opioids have been shown in randomized, controlled trials to be of benefit in painful diabetic neuropathy, although none has Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved labeling for this indication.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To analyze the safety and efficacy of zonisamide in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. This pilot study is the first randomized, controlled trial of zonisamide for the treatment of any neuropathic pain disorder.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-two patients 18-80 years of age with type I or type II diabetes mellitus and at least a 3-month history of painful diabetic neuropathy were screened in the study, and 25 were randomized to zonisamide (N = 13) or placebo (N = 12). The study drug was titrated over a 6-week period and continued at a fixed dosage for a 6-week maintenance period. The mean dosage of zonisamide for the maintenance phase was 540 mg/day.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients kept a daily log of their pain using both a 0-100 mm visual analog scale and a 0-10 Likert scale.

RESULT

Pain scores on both the visual analog scale and the Likert scale decreased more for the zonisamide group compared with the placebo group, regardless of whether the comparison was made for the intent-to-treat population, the population that entered the maintenance phase, or the completer population, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Tolerability of zonisamide was only fair in this study, which had a high number of dropouts from the zonisamide group.

CONCLUSION

A larger randomized, controlled trial is needed to establish the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide for painful diabetic neuropathy.

Zonisamide: a review of its use in the management of partial seizures in epilepsy

Zonisamide (Zonegran, Excegran) is a new-generation, broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) currently approved as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of medically refractory partial seizures in adults in the US and as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy in the control of partial and generalised seizures in adults and children in Japan and Korea. Either as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy, zonisamide effectively reduces the frequency of partial seizures, with or without secondary generalisation to tonic-clonic seizures, in adults and children with epilepsy. The drug is generally well tolerated and, additionally, has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile permitting once- or twice-daily administration. Direct head-to-head comparisons with other AEDs would be beneficial in fully defining the place of zonisamide in therapy. In the meantime, adjunctive therapy or monotherapy with zonisamide is a convenient, useful option for the management of partial seizures, including those refractory to other AEDs.

Use of zonisamide in pediatric patients

Zonisamide is a broad-spectrum antiepilepsy drug approved in the United States for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in adults with epilepsy. Studies in Japan have established zonisamide as effective and safe for use in children, but there is limited information from the United States concerning its use in pediatric patients. This chart-review study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and appropriate dosage of zonisamide for treating seizures in pediatric and adolescent patients. Charts of 50 pediatric patients (mean age 9.1 years, range 9 months to 20 years) who received zonisamide were evaluated for demographic characteristics, seizure types, dosage (mean = 15.8 mg/kg/day), response, concurrent medications, and adverse events. After treatment, 8 patients were seizure-free, and 11 others had > or =50% improvement in seizure control, including 11 of the 28 patients for whom treatment with six or more antiepileptic drugs was insufficient. Thirty-one patients experienced at least one adverse event while receiving zonisamide, and 14 discontinued as a result.

Broad-spectrum efficacy of zonisamide at 12 months in children with intractable epilepsy

In a retrospective study of 35 children (ages 8 months to 22 years; mean age 9 years) with intractable epilepsy, seizure frequency was determined before and after 12 months of zonisamide therapy. Charts were reviewed for seizure type (focal, generalized, or mixed), cognitive function (no special education versus special education), concomitant anticonvulsant medications, and the number of previous anticonvulsant drugs. Good to excellent seizure control (50-100% reduction) was attained in seven (54%) patients with generalized seizures, two (40%) patients with focal seizures, five (35%) patients with mixed seizures, and one (33%) patient with infantile spasms. In this group of children, the efficacy of zonisamide was comparable for focal, generalized, and mixed seizures. The efficacy of zonisamide was independent of cognitive status. Adverse effects were not associated with a higher mean dose. This could be attributable to different rates of metabolism or represent idiosyncratic responses to the medication. Our finding that those children taking the combination of zonisamide and levetiracetam had a significantly worse outcome than those on levetiracetam and a different drug warrants further study, both clinically and from the standpoint of mechanisms of action of zonisamide and levetiracetam and/or their pharmacodynamic interactions.

Clinical experience with zonisamide monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in children with epilepsy at a tertiary care referral center

We evaluated our clinical experience with zonisamide, a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug, in a group of children with predominantly medically refractory epilepsy. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients at our tertiary referral center following Institutional Review Board approval. Observers documented reports of seizure frequency, and seizure types were identified either clinically or by prior video-electroencephalography monitoring. We identified 68 patients (age range 1.9-18.1 years [median 6.9 years]; male to female ratio 1.3:1) treated with zonisamide for 0.7 to 28.9 months; at the last visit, 22% and 78% were on monotherapy and adjunctive therapy, respectively. The median duration of treatment and maintenance dose at the end of the follow-up were 11.2 months and 8.0 mg/kg/day, respectively. Seizure types included generalized (primary generalized tonic-clonic, myoclonic, tonic, atonic, absence) and partial (simple, complex, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures); 10 (15%) patients had both partial and generalized seizures. Sixteen (25.8%) patients were seizure free, although five of them were already in remission prior to starting zonisamide. Thirteen (21.0%) patients had a > 50% seizure reduction, 10 (16.1%) patients had a < 50% seizure reduction, 14 (22.6%) had no improvement in baseline seizures, and 9 (14.5%) reported having increased seizures. The latter were mostly associated with dosage alterations in concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Common side effects were central nervous system related, including behavioral or psychiatric (23.5%), cognitive dysfunction (12.0%), and sedation (10.3%). Eleven (16.2%) patients ultimately discontinued zonisamide, but only five were strictly due to side effects. Zonisamide is clinically effective against multiple seizure types in a significant proportion of children with epilepsy across a broad age range. Drug discontinuation as a result of side effects is uncommon.

Zonisamide monotherapy for epilepsy in children and young adults

Several of the newer antiepilepsy drugs have not been tested as monotherapy in controlled trials. Zonisamide is a broad-spectrum antiepilepsy drug indicated for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in adults. However, several small, open-label studies have indicated that it may be safe and effective as monotherapy. The present chart review study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of zonisamide monotherapy in a pediatric and young adult patient group. Patient records at the Blue Bird Circle Clinic for Pediatric Neurology were reviewed to identify patients receiving zonisamide monotherapy. Efficacy was assessed from seizure diaries and patients' subjective evaluations. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by analysis of adverse events and change in body weight. The study included 131 patients aged 1 to 21.8 years with a broad spectrum of seizure types and epilepsy syndromes. A total of 101 patients (77.1%) achieved a 50% or greater decrease in seizure frequency, including 39 patients who achieved seizure freedom. Zonisamide monotherapy was well tolerated, with three patients (2.3%) discontinuing for adverse events. These results support open-label studies from Japan reporting that zonisamide monotherapy is safe and effective in pediatric and young adult patients.

Zonisamide and associated oligohidrosis and hyperthermia

Zonisamide is an antiepileptic agent that is indicated as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures in adults. Oligohidrosis has been reported in a small number of patients receiving zonisamide and, in a proportion of these patients, hyperthermia has occurred. Most reports of hyperthermia have been in children, typically occurring during the summer months. However, the mechanism of zonisamide-associated oligohidrosis is not fully understood. Thirteen events of oligohidrosis, or hyperthermia, associated with zonisamide were reported in the US during the 3 years after zonisamide was approved, an estimated incidence of 1 case per 4590 patient-years. These events happened mostly in children. In Japan, all reported cases of zonisamide-associated oligohidrosis or hyperthermia have been in children, with an incidence of 1 case per 10,000 pediatric-years during the first 11 years of marketing. In each case, oligohidrosis was reversible upon discontinuation of zonisamide. Ensuring that children remain cool and well hydrated during hot weather can minimize the potential for hyperthermia resulting from oligohidrosis.

Effects of antiepileptic medications on psychiatric and behavioral comorbidities in children and adolescents with epilepsy

The three goals of this article are (1) to delineate the limitations in determining the actual incidence of antiepileptic drug (AED) psychiatric and behavioral side effects; (2) to summarize existing data on the direct effects of AEDs on psychiatric and behavioral comorbidities and examine the relationship between these direct effects and specific AED mechanisms of action; and (3) to recognize the indirect effects of AEDs on psychiatric and behavioral medications that can result in aggravation of these comorbidities through drug-drug interactions. All of these data are then combined and formatted into a practical algorithm useful in many clinical situations.

Behavioral and psychiatric adverse events associated with antiepileptic drugs commonly used in pediatric patients

Multiple factors-including the efficacy of the antiepileptic drug for the particular seizure type, availability of pediatrics-friendly formulations, the ease of dosing and titration, and tolerability issues, such as possible drug interactions and adverse events-affect the selection of the best antiepileptic drug for a child with epilepsy. Behavioral problems are common in children with epilepsy and can be aggravated or initiated by antiepileptic drug therapy. The types and frequencies of antiepileptic drug-associated behavioral events can influence a clinician's drug selection, drug management, and counseling of parents. Unfortunately, appreciating differences among antiepileptic drugs in behavioral adverse event profiles is problematic because, among other reasons, methodologies for reporting, collecting, and analyzing adverse events are not uniform across trials, and there is marked heterogeneity in study design among trials. This review summarizes incidence rates for behavioral and psychiatric adverse events taken from studies of children with epilepsy. These rates are reported for the 10 most commonly prescribed antiepileptic drugs (valproic acid, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, lamotrigine, phenytoin, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, zonisamide, and gabapentin), grouped according to their predominant mechanism of action. Despite the numerous methodologic inconsistencies, some similarities in adverse event profiles among antiepileptic drugs that share mechanisms of action are apparent. Moreover, the overwhelming body of data on the behavioral effects of phenobarbital should convince clinicians that, whenever possible, it should not be used as the initial-or even the second-monotherapy in children with epilepsy.

Management of epilepsy in mentally retarded children using the newer antiepileptic drugs, vagus nerve stimulation, and surgery

Clusters of seizures, prolonged seizures, and status epilepticus occur more frequently in children with multiple disabilities, and chronic seizures are more likely to be refractory to treatment. In many patients, the seizures appear to contribute to the mental retardation. Thus, if the lives of these children are to improve, seizure control is essential. However, medical treatment can interfere with cognition and cause behavioral disturbances, making life very difficult for the child and the child's family. With the introduction of 10 new antiepileptic drugs in the last decade, the treatment of epilepsy in multiply handicapped children has significantly advanced. These new antiepileptic drugs may improve seizure control, medication tolerance, or both. Although the ultimate therapeutic goal is to keep children seizure free and alert, compromises regarding medication choice and dosage are still necessary in many cases. Novel treatment options, such as the vagus nerve stimulator, may decrease seizure frequency without behavioral or cognitive side effects. In carefully selected children with specific epilepsy syndromes, epilepsy surgery can provide partial or complete relief from seizures.

Zonisamide monotherapy in a multi-group clinic

OBJECTIVE

Reports on zonisamide monotherapy are limited despite favourable preliminary data, and typically restricted to tertiary referral centres. The goal of this study is to report clinical experience with zonisamide monotherapy in a large, multi-group clinic setting.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of patients treated with zonisamide monotherapy in the Neurology Department of the Kelsey-Seybold Clinic (Houston, Texas) during an 18-month period. We analysed subgroups of patients who were naive to antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy (Group 1) and those who had previous exposure to AEDs (Group 2).

RESULTS

The study included 54 paediatric and adult patients with a variety of seizure types: 15 patients in Group 1 and 39 patients in Group 2. Mean maintenance zonisamide dosages in the two groups were similar (193 mg/day in Group 1 vs. 218 mg/day in Group 2). Thirty-eight patients (70.4%) continued zonisamide monotherapy, with 7 patients (13.0%) adding a second AED and 9 patients (16.7%) switching to a different drug. Of the 24 patients who became seizure free on zonisamide monotherapy, 11 were on the 100-mg initial dosage. Zonisamide monotherapy was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Zonisamide monotherapy is safe and effective for a variety of seizure types and may be appropriate as first-line therapy in some cases.