A Novel Parent Questionnaire for the Detection of Seizures in Children of Spanish-Speaking Families

Digital measures in epilepsy in low-resourced environments

INTRODUCTION

Digital measures and digital health-care delivery have been rarely implemented in lower-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), contributing to worsening global disparities and inequities. Sustainable ways to implement and use digital approaches will help to improve time to access, management, and quality of life in persons with epilepsy, goals that remain unreachable in under-resourced communities. As under-resourced environments differ in human and economic resources, no one approach will be appropriate to all LMICs.

AREAS COVERED

Digital health and tools to monitor and measure digital endpoints and metrics of quality of life will need to be developed or adapted to the specific needs of under-resourced areas. Portable technologies may partially address the urban-rural divide. Careful delineation of stakeholders and their engagement and alignment in all efforts is critically important if these initiatives are to be successfully sustained. Privacy issues, neglected in many regions globally, must be purposefully addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

Epilepsy care in under-resourced environments has been limited by the lack of relevant technologies for diagnosis and treatment. Digital biomarkers, and investigative technological advances, may finally make it feasible to sustainably improve care delivery and ultimately quality of life including personalized epilepsy care.

Language is brain: Improving neurologic health equity for linguistically diverse populations

Neurologic clinical care requires that clinicians gather and synthesize complex information, including a thorough, precise history and a detailed physical examination that maximizes the patient's cooperation. Yet, for patients who do not speak the dominant language in the country or region where they live, effective communication with their clinician may not always occur. In this article, we discuss the impact of language on neurologic care, focusing on access to care and on the diagnosis and treatment of two common and potentially life-threatening conditions: stroke and epilepsy. We then review implications for clinical neurologic care as well as medical education and present evidence-based recommendations for improving neurologic health equity for linguistically diverse populations. Strategies should integrate professional medical interpreters (for oral communication) and translators (for written materials) into the neurologic team, account for families and caregivers in a culturally humble manner, and teach learners to apply clinical neurologic skills in both language-concordant and discordant situations.