Computerized Working Memory Training for Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1): A Pilot Study

The wide world of technological telerehabilitation for pediatric neurologic and neurodevelopmental disorders - a systematic review

Introduction

The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for assessing and treating cognitive and motor disorders is promoting home-based telerehabilitation. This approach involves ongoing monitoring within a motivating context to help patients generalize their skills. It can also reduce healthcare costs and geographic barriers by minimizing hospitalization. This systematic review focuses on investigating key aspects of telerehabilitation protocols for children with neurodevelopmental or neurological disorders, including technology used, outcomes, caregiver involvement, and dosage, to guide clinical practice and future research.

Method

This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. The PICO framework was followed to define the search strategy for technology-based telerehabilitation interventions targeting the pediatric population (aged 0-18) with neurological or neurodevelopmental disorders. The search encompassed Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Independent reviewers were responsible for selecting relevant papers and extracting data, while data harmonization and analysis were conducted centrally.

Results

A heterogeneous and evolving situation emerged from our data. Our findings reported that most of the technologies adopted for telerehabilitation are commercial devices; however, research prototypes and clinical software were also employed with a high potential for personalization and treatment efficacy. The efficacy of these protocols on health or health-related domains was also explored by categorizing the outcome measures according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Most studies targeted motor and neuropsychological functions, while only a minority of papers explored language or multi-domain protocols. Finally, although caregivers were rarely the direct target of intervention, their role was diffusely highlighted as a critical element of the home-based rehabilitation setting.

Discussion

This systematic review offers insights into the integration of technological devices into telerehabilitation programs for pediatric neurologic and neurodevelopmental disorders. It highlights factors contributing to the effectiveness of these interventions and suggests the need for further development, particularly in creating dynamic and multi-domain rehabilitation protocols. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of promoting home-based and family-centered care, which could involve caregivers more actively in the treatment, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes for children with neurological or neurodevelopmental conditions.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO (CRD42020210663).

Longitudinal association between executive function and academic achievement in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas

OBJECTIVE

To examine how executive functioning (EF) relates to academic achievement longitudinally in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) and whether age at baseline moderates this relationship.

METHOD

Participants included 88 children with NF1 and PNs (ages 6-18 years old, M = 12.05, SD = 3.62, 50 males) enrolled in a natural history study. Neuropsychological assessments were administered three times over 6 years. EF (working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and attention) was assessed by performance-based (PB) and parent-reported (PR) measures. Multilevel growth modeling was used to examine how EF at baseline related to initial levels and changes in broad math, reading, and writing across time, controlling for demographic variables.

RESULTS

The relationship between EF and academic achievement varied across EF and academic domains. Cognitive flexibility (PB) uniquely explained more variances in initial math, reading, and writing scores; working memory (PB) uniquely explained more variances in initial levels of reading and writing. The associations between EF and academic achievement tended to remain consistent across age groups with one exception: Lower initial levels of inhibitory control (PR) were related to a greater decline in reading scores. This pattern was more evident among younger (versus older) children.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings emphasize the heterogeneous nature of academic development in NF1 and that EF skills could help explain the within-group variability in this population. Routine cognitive/academic monitoring via comprehensive assessments and early targeted treatments consisting of medication and/or systematic cognitive interventions are important to evaluate for improving academic performance in children with NF1 and PNs.

Understanding the Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) experience and the priorities of individuals with NF1 and their caregivers for cognitive and social-emotional research

BACKGROUND

Patient engagement is increasingly recognized as a valuable, essential aspect of Neurofibromatosis research given the unique experiences and morbidities associated with the diagnosis. Engaging patients and families can enhance the relevance, methodology, and feasibility of clinical trials.

METHODS

A REDCap survey ascertaining information on NF-related morbidities, priorities, and interests in cognitive and social-emotional research, and willingness to participate in research was dispensed to 4,565 individuals consented to the Children's Tumor Foundation (CTF) Registry with NF1. This included children and adults with NF1 and parents/caregivers of children with NF1.

RESULTS

525 individuals fully completed the survey: 295 parents/caregivers (M_{age child} = 10.12, range = 3-24), 194 adults with NF1 (M_age = 45.73, range = 19-81), and 36 children with NF1 (M_age = 12.61, range = 10-17). Less than 10% of respondents have participated in cognitive research, while 42.4-49.5% indicated having sought opportunities for cognitive research. Most (79.4-82.4%) respondents reported that cognitive research is very/extremely important, with learning/academics and emotional functioning were priorities. Willingness to participate in research aligned with areas of importance.

CONCLUSION

Analysis highlights that most survey respondents believe cognitive and social-emotional research is very important, but a relatively small number have participated. This finding may highlight poor dissemination of information of research opportunities to the broader NF community and limitations to access based on geography or other factors. Respondents indicate that learning/academic problems and emotional challenges to be research priorities. Continuing to engage patients and families with NF is expected to enhance the value and engagement in cognitive research.