Outcome Rating Scales for Pediatric Head Injury

Physical Functioning After Admission to the PICU: A Scoping Review

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Objectives:

To conduct a scoping review to 1) describe findings and determinants of physical functioning in children during and/or after PICU stay, 2) identify which domains of physical functioning are measured, 3) and synthesize the clinical and research knowledge gaps.

Data Sources:

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.

Study Selection:

Two investigators independently screened and included studies against predetermined criteria.

Data Extraction:

One investigator extracted data with review by a second investigator. A narrative analyses approach was used.

Data Synthesis:

A total of 2,610 articles were identified, leaving 68 studies for inclusion. Post-PICU/hospital discharge scores show that PICU survivors report difficulties in physical functioning during and years after PICU stay. Although sustained improvements in the long-term have been reported, most of the reported levels were lower compared with the reference and baseline values. Decreased physical functioning was associated with longer hospital stay and presence of comorbidities. A diversity of instruments was used in which mobility and self-care were mostly addressed.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results show that children perceive moderate to severe difficulties in physical functioning during and years after PICU stay. Longitudinal assessments during and after PICU stay should be incorporated, especially for children with a higher risk for poor functional outcomes. There is need for consensus on the most suitable methods to assess physical functioning in children admitted to the PICU.

Children's longing for everydayness: life following traumatic brain injury in the USA

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

Little is known about life after traumatic brain injury (TBI) from the child's perspective.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This descriptive phenomenological investigation explored themes of children's experiences following moderate-to-severe TBI.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

INCLUSION CRITERIA

(1) 6-18 years of age at injury; (2) moderate-to-severe TBI; (3) ≤3 years since injury; and (4) English speaking and could participate in an interview. Children participated (n = 39) in two interviews at least 1 year apart. A preliminary model was developed and shared for participants' input.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Six themes emerged: (1) it is like waking up in a bad dream; (2) I thought going home would get me back to my old life, but it did not; (3) everything is such hard work; (4) you feel like you will never be like the person you were before; (5) it is not all bad; and (6) some people get it, but many people do not.

CONCLUSIONS

Social support was important to how children adjusted to changes or losses. Most children did adjust to functional changes by second interviews. Children had a more difficult time adjusting to how others defined them and limited their possibilities for a meaningful life.

Evaluating paediatric brain injury services in NSW

BACKGROUND

Rehabilitation professionals strive to provide high-quality evidence-based services for children. Developing systems to measure and monitor the benefits of our services, and health outcomes for children is complex and challenging. The Community Outcome Project aims to introduce systematic outcome measurement across the network of paediatric community-based brain injury services within the New South Wales Brain Injury Rehabilitation Program (BIRP) to support clinical practice and service evaluation.

METHODS

A literature review informed the development of the evaluative framework and identified available paediatric outcome measures which may be appropriate. Extensive consultation with clinicians supported project planning and identified clinical priorities that the outcome measures needed to capture. Outcome measures were shortlisted by matching them to identified clinical priorities, and then trialled in clinical practice. Qualitative feedback regarding clinical utility and feasibility was obtained from clinical staff. The process has utilized change management strategies to ensure the success of the project and keep staff engaged.

RESULTS

The process identified the three main clinical priorities for outcome measurement - family functioning, school performance and participation. Three outcome measures were chosen for the pilot project that is currently underway. They are Family Burden of Injury Interview, Academic Competence and Evaluation Scales and Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation. Plans for analyses of outcome data within the paediatric BIRP services are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive preparation is required to optimize staff engagement in a project that systematically introduces outcome measures that are useful to clinicians, clients and service providers. Managing the change required is a key focus of the project. Benefits and costs to clinicians and services will be discussed.

Disparities in the delivery of pediatric trauma care

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. During the last few decades, trauma systems have evolved to improve the care of the injured with an ultimate goal of saving lives. As a result, pediatric trauma centers (PTC) have been established to optimize outcomes for injured children. We sought to determine whether injured children treated at PTC or adult trauma centers (ATC) with added qualifications to treat injured children receive better trauma care than those treated at other hospitals or trauma centers.

METHODS

We reviewed more than 60 published studies on pediatric trauma outcomes. The studies included registry analysis: single and multihospital experience; abdominal, head and neck, and thoracic trauma; as well as functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The data show that most injured children are not treated at PTC due to the geographically limited distribution of such specialized care, lack of pediatric surgeons, and other specialists. These limitations create persistent disparities in outcomes for injured children depending on where they are treated. Some of the larger database analyses suggest lower mortality rate, better outcome for nonoperative treatment of blunt abdominal injuries, and improved overall functional outcome for those children treated at PTC. However, others fail to demonstrate differences for children treated at ATC or ATC with added qualifications.

CONCLUSION

Although this analysis does not provide a definitive answer to the question as to which type of trauma center provides better care for injured pediatric patients, it identifies current gaps and disparities in the care of injured children that can be remedied through education and training.

[Long-term consequences of pediatric trauma requiring intensive care]

INTRODUCTION

Trauma is a major cause of pediatric morbidity. The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term effects of severe trauma in children and their families.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed an observational, cross sectional study of 209 children admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit due to trauma between 1999 and 2003. Family members and/or children were interviewed at least 2 years after the event. Functional situation was assessed by means of the Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) scale and neurological status by means of the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) scale. Subjective perception of quality of life was also evaluated.

RESULTS

At assessment, patient age was 13+/-4 years. The causes of trauma were traffic accidents (42.6%), falls (30.1%), bicycle accidents (15.3%) and other causes (12%). The trauma affected the brain and cranium in 78.9%, skeleton in 20.2%, abdomen in 16.3% and other body regions in 15.3% of the patients. At assessment, 1.5 % of the patients were in a persistent vegetative state, 0.5% had severe disability, and 1% had moderate disability. A total of 9.5% had some type of persistent psychological disorder and 3.8 % needed some kind of help to perform daily activities. The median (range) score for self-estimated quality of life by the family was 3 (0-6) for the group of children with moderate or severe disability, while 12.9% of parents reported serious alterations of family dynamics related to the trauma event.

CONCLUSIONS

Most children who survive after severe trauma achieve a good functional situation in the long term. Although the number of children with severe sequelae is small, these children have serious difficulties in achieving normal social adaptation and their quality of life is clearly impaired.

The role of functional neuroimaging in pediatric brain injury

The aim of this article is to review empirical studies published in the last 10 years that used various functional neuroimaging techniques to assess pediatric patients with brain injury. Overall, these studies have demonstrated the ability of functional neuroimaging to offer unique information concerning the diagnosis, clinical outcome, and recovery mechanisms after pediatric brain injury. Future research using functional neuroimaging is recommended to better understand the functional reorganization and neurodevelopmental consequences resulting from brain injury. Such research might allow clinicians to design tailored early-intervention and rehabilitation programs to maximize the recovery process for pediatric patients. Limitations and advantages associated with the use of functional neuroimaging in pediatric populations are discussed.