Use of Cellular and Plasma Apheresis in the Critically Ill Patient: Part II: Clinical Indications and Applications

Indications and Outcomes of Patients Receiving Therapeutic Plasma Exchange under Critical Care Conditions: A Retrospective Eleven-Year Single-Center Study at a Tertiary Care Center

Background: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is frequently performed in critical care settings for heterogenous indications. However, specific intensive care unit (ICU) data regarding TPE indications, patient characteristics and technical details are sparse. Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study using data from January 2010 until August 2021 for patients treated with TPE in an ICU setting at the University Hospital Zurich. Data collected included patient characteristics and outcomes, ICU-specific parameters, as well as apheresis-specific technical parameters and complications. Results: We identified n = 105 patients receiving n = 408 TPEs for n = 24 indications during the study period. The most common was thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) (38%), transplant-associated complications (16.3%) and vasculitis (14%). One-third of indications (35.2%) could not be classified according to ASFA. Anaphylaxis was the most common TPE-related complication (6.7%), while bleeding complications were rare (1%). The median duration of ICU stay was 8 ± 14 days. Ventilator support, renal replacement therapy or vasopressors were required in 59 (56.2%), 26 (24.8%), and 35 (33.3%) patients, respectively, and 6 (5.7%) patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The overall hospital survival rate was 88.6%. Conclusion: Our study provides valuable real-world data on heterogenous TPE indications for patients in the ICU setting, potentially supporting decision-making.

Plasma Filtration Versus Centrifugation in Pediatric Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: Should the Diagnosis Define the Method?†

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is used for a variety of illnesses in critically ill pediatric patients. Although both centrifugation and filtration are known to be effective methods, to our knowledge, clinical results for TPE by these methods are not compared in pediatric patient populations. One hundred patients who had TPE for a variety of diagnoses were included in the study. In 55 patients plasma exchange was implemented by centrifugation and in 45, by filtration. These two groups were further divided into subgroups according to admittance diagnoses. The demographic information, admittance Pediatric Risk of Mortality scores, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) scores before beginning of therapy and PELOD at the end of therapy, durations of ventilatory support, pediatric intensive care unit and hospital stay, and outcomes were compared. Although the survival was significantly better in filtration group, it included more patients with neurologic diagnoses. Filtration group standard mortality rate was 0.6. In both groups, the PELOD scores after the termination of TPE were significantly decreased compared to that before beginning of TPE. Within thrombotic microangiopathy and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis subgroups, median PELOD scores before treatment were higher in centrifugation patients but survival was similar with both methods. Both methods of TPE are alike in decreasing PELOD scores. In the filtration group, survival benefit of TPE is evident. In thrombotic microangiopathy patients, despite higher PELOD scores in the centrifugation group, survival is similar for both methods. These findings should be retested in randomized studies and the underlying physiology awaits to be uncovered.

Comparison of plasma exchange performances between Spectra Optia and COBE Spectra apheresis systems in repeated procedures considering variability and using specific statistical models

Repeated therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) procedures using centrifugation techniques became a standard therapy in some diseases. As the new device Spectra Optia (SPO; Terumo BCT) was available, we studied its performances in repeated procedures in 20 patients in three apheresis units. First we analysed the performance results obtained by SPO. Second we compared the performances of the SPO device to a standard device, COBE Spectra (CSP; Terumo BCT) in the same patients using statistical method of mixed effects linear regression that considers variability between patients, centres and apheresis procedures. The performances analysed were classified according to plasma removal performances and their consequences on patients whose blood disturbances were assessed. Primary outcome was plasma removal efficiency (PRE) and PRE-anticoagulant corrected which was a more accurate parameter. Secondary outcomes corresponded to the volume of ACD-A consumed, platelets content in waste bag, procedure duration and status of coagulation system observed after TPE sessions. Before comparing the performances of both devices we compared the plasma volumes (PVs) processed in both techniques which showed that the PVs processed in SPO procedures were lower than in CSP procedures. In these conditions the statistical analysis revealed similar performances in both apheresis devices in PRE (p = ns) but better performances with SPO when considering higher PRE corrected by anticoagulant volume used (p < 0.05). Comparison of secondary outcomes showed no difference after SPO and CSP. After verifying that pre-apheresis patients' coagulation blood levels were identical before SPO and CSP, we showed identical haemostasis disturbances after SPO and CSP but lower platelet losses and higher fibrinogen post-apheresis blood levels after SPO (p < 0.05). No side effects or technical complications occurred during and after SPO and CSP. This study demonstrated that the Spectra Optia device is an alternative device to today's standard, the COBE Spectra device.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in an intensive care unit (ICU): a 10-year, single-center experience

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a blood purification method that effectively allows for the removal of waste substances by separating out plasma from other components of blood and the removed plasma is replaced with solutions such as albumin and/or plasma, or crystalloid/colloid solutions. Plasma exchange therapies are becoming increasingly essential, being used in daily practice in critical care settings for various indications, either as a first-line therapeutic intervention or as an adjunct to conventional therapies. This retrospective clinical study analyzes 10-year therapeutic plasma exchange activity experience in an 18-bed ICU at a tertiary care university hospital with a large, critically-ill patient population. Medical records of 1188 plasma exchange procedures on 329 patients with different diagnoses admitted from January 2000 to July 2010 were evaluated. The aim of the study was to determine the TPE indications and outcomes of the patients who underwent TPE in the ICU with conventional therapy. The secondary endpoints were to determine the differences between different patient groups (septic vs. non-septic indications) in terms of adverse events and procedural differences.

Regional citrate anticoagulation--a safe and effective procedure in pediatric apheresis therapy

Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has been considered to be a standard component of pediatric apheresis therapy for more than a decade. However, data on dosing recommendations and evaluations of the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation are rarely found in published reports. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to present our single-center experience with RCA in pediatric apheresis therapy with the aim of developing an operating procedure. Five children aged 7-14 years underwent a total of 72 (range 3-44) therapeutic apheresis sessions with RCA in the form of immunoadsorption therapy (2 patients), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis (1 patient), and plasmapheresis (two patients). A 3% citrate solution was used. Citrate flow was started at 4.0% of the blood flow velocity and was adapted to match post-filter ionized calcium levels ≤ 0.30 mmol/l. Once the patient's ionized calcium fell to <1.05 mmol/l, an intravenous 10% calcium gluconate solution was administered. Twenty pediatric apheresis patients who received standard heparinization, matched for age, body surface area, processed plasma volume, and blood flow velocity, were enrolled in the study as a comparison group. No side effects were experienced in 72 apheresis session. The 3% citrate solution had to be reduced gradually during the apheresis session and was infused at a mean of 2.8-3.8% of the blood flow rate. Serum bicarbonate levels before and after the apheresis session with RCA [23.9 (range 18.9-30.1) vs. 26.3 (20.2-33.0) mmol/l, respectively] were significantly different (p=0.013). All patients required intravenous calcium substitution to maintain serum calcium levels within the physiological range. Due to the administration of the 3% citrate solution and calcium, all patients significantly gained weight during the procedure, with a median weight gain of 2.5% (p<0.001). The extra fluid load caused problems in patients with kidney failure. Our regimen with RCA is safe, feasible, and effective in pediatric therapeutic apheresis therapy. For RCA in apheresis, we recommend (1) a citrate (3%) flow of 3.3% of the blood flow, (2) prophylactic intravenous calcium substitution from the beginning, and (3) a more highly concentrated citrate solution in the case of oliguric patients.

Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and severe sepsis/ systemic inflammatory response syndrome/multiorgan dysfunction syndrome/macrophage activation syndrome share common intermediate phenotypes on a spectrum of inflammation

In an effort to attain earlier diagnoses in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), the International Histiocyte Society has now broadened their diagnostic criteria to no longer differentiate primary (HLH) and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (SHLH). Five of the following eight diagnostic criteria needed to be met: 1) fever, 2) cytopenia of two lines, 3) hypertriglyceridemia and/or hypofibrinogenemia, 4) hyperferritinemia (>500 microg/L), 5) hemophagocytosis, 6) elevated soluble interleukin-2 receptor (CD25), 7) decreased natural killer-cell activity, and 8) splenomegaly can also commonly be found in patients with sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Nevertheless, the therapeutic options for these are radically different. Chemotherapy and bone marrow transplant have been used for treatment of HLH/SHLH, whereas antibiotics and supportive treatment are used in severe sepsis/SIRS and MODS. MAS is treated with limited immune suppression. Outcomes are also different, SHLH has a mortality rate around 50%, whereas pediatric septic shock and MODS have a mortality of 10.3% and 18%, respectively, and severe sepsis in previously healthy children has a mortality rate of 2%. MAS has a mortality rate between 8% and 22%. Because SHLH and severe sepsis/SIRS/MODS/MAS share clinical and laboratory inflammatory phenotypes, we recommend extreme caution when considering applying HLH therapies to children with sepsis/SIRS/MODS/MAS. HLH therapies are clearly warranted for children with HLH; however, a quantitative functional estimate of cytotoxic lymphocyte function may be a more precise approach to define the overlap of these conditions, better identify these processes, and develop novel therapeutic protocols that may lead to improved treatments and outcomes.

Plasmapheresis reverses all side-effects of a cisplatin overdose--a case report and treatment recommendation

Background

Cisplatin is widely used as an antineoplastic agent since it is effective against a broad spectrum of different tumours. Nevertheless, it has several potential side effects affecting different organ systems and an overdose may lead to life-threatening complications and even death.

Case presentation

We report on a 46-year old woman with non-small cell lung cancer who accidentally received 225 mg/m² of cisplatin, which was threefold the dose as scheduled, within a 3-day period. Two days later, the patient presented with hearing loss, severe nausea and vomiting, acute renal failure as well as elevated liver enzymes. In addition, she developed a severe myelodepression. After plasmapheresis on two consecutive days and vigorous supportive treatment, the toxicity-related symptoms improved and the patient recovered without any sequelae.

Conclusion

To date, no general accepted guidelines for the treatment of cisplatin overdoses are available. Along with the experience from other published cases, our report shows that plasmapheresis is capable of lowering cisplatin plasma and serum levels efficiently. Therefore, plasma exchange performed as soon as possible can ameliorate all side effects of a cisplatin overdose and be a potential tool for clinicians for treatment. However, additional intensive supportive treatment-modalities are necessary to control all occurring side effects.

Therapeutic Apheresis-State of the Art in the Year 2005

Therapeutic apheresis is an extracorporeal blood purification method for the treatment of diseases in which pathological proteins or cells have to be eliminated. Selective plasma processing is more efficient in pathogen removal than unselective plasma exchange and does not require a substitution fluid like albumin. This overview presents the various selective devices for the treatment of plasma (plasmapheresis) and blood cells (leukocyte apheresis). Prospective randomized trials were performed for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (Rheopheresis), sudden hearing loss (heparin-induced lipoprotein precipitation [HELP]), rheumatoid arthritis (Prosorba), dilative cardiomyopathy (Ig-Therasorb, Immunosorba), acute-on-chronic liver failure (molecular adsorbent recirculating system [MARS]), and ulcerative colitis (Cellsorba). Prospective non-randomized controlled trials were carried out treating hypercholesterolemia (Liposorber) and crossmatch-positive recipients before kidney transplantation (Immunosorba). Uncontrolled studies were done for ABO-incompatibility in living donor kidney transplantation (KT) (Glycosorb), acute humoral rejection after KT (Immunosorba) and acute liver failure (Prometheus). According to the 2002 International Apheresis Registry covering 11428 sessions in 811 patients, 79% of the patients showed an improvement of their condition by apheresis and only a few sessions were fraught with adverse effects (AE). The major AE were blood access difficulties (3.1%) and hypotension (1.6%). In summary, therapeutic apheresis is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of diseases refractory to drug therapy.