Current concepts in resuscitation

Prospective evaluation of plasma lactate parameters for prognosticating dogs with shock

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether admission venous plasma lactate concentration, serially calculated lactate variables, or the Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE_fast ) score could discriminate hospital survivors from non-survivors in dogs presenting to the emergency department with clinical signs of shock.

DESIGN

Prospective case series performed over a 24-month period.

SETTING

Large urban private teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Seventy-one dogs admitted to the ICU with initial peripheral venous plasma lactate concentration > 2.5 mmol/L and clinical and hemodynamic parameters consistent with shock.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, temperature, initial venous plasma lactate, and APPLE_fast score were recorded at admission. Lactate concentrations were serially recorded at predefined time points and used to calculate lactate variables, including lactime (time lactate > 2.5 mmol/L), lactate clearance ([lactate_initial - lactate_delayed ]/ lactate_initial × 100), and LAC_AREA (area under the lactate concentration versus time curve). Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Overall survival rate was 61%. Admission plasma lactate did not differ between groups (P = 0.28). Lactime was shorter in survivors vs non-survivors (P = 0.03). Lactate clearance at hours (h) 1, 4, 10, and 16 was greater in survivors vs non-survivors (P < 0.05). Final plasma lactate clearance differed between groups (P < 0.05). LAC_AREA at time intervals 1 to 4 hours, 4 to 10 hours, 10 to 16 hours, and 16 to 24 hours was larger in non-survivors vs survivors (P < 0.05). Total LAC_AREA did not differ between groups (P = 0.51). Admission APPLE_fast was not different between survivors and non-survivors (P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

While neither single APPLE_fast nor admission plasma lactate concentration could discriminate between hospital survivors and non-survivors, measures of lactate clearance can prognosticate survival in dogs with shock.

Utility of admission lactate concentration, lactate variables, and shock index in outcome assessment in dogs diagnosed with shock

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether admission venous plasma lactate concentration, calculated lactate variables, or shock index (SI) could discriminate hospital survivors from nonsurvivors in dogs admitted with shock.

DESIGN

Prospective investigation performed over a 19-month period.

SETTING

Large urban private teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Twenty-three dogs consecutively admitted to the ICU from January 2008 to July 2009 with initial peripheral venous plasma lactate concentration >2 mmol/L (18.0 mg/dL) and clinical and hemodynamic parameters consistent with shock.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and venous plasma lactate concentrations were serially recorded at predefined time points and used to calculate SI (SI = heart rate/systolic blood pressure) and lactate variables, including lactime (time lactate > 2.0 mmol/L), lactate clearance ([lactate_initial - lactate_delayed ]/lactate_initial × 100), and LAC_AREA (area under the lactate concentration versus time curve). Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Overall survival rate was 61%. Admission venous plasma lactate concentration did not differ between groups (P = 0.2). Lactime was shorter in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P = 0.02). Lactate clearance at 1, 10, 16, 24, and 36 hours, and final lactate clearance were greater in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P < 0.05). LAC_AREA at time intervals 0-1, 1-4, 4-10, 10-16, 16-24, 24-30, and 30-36 hours was larger in nonsurvivors versus survivors (P < 0.05). Total LAC_AREA did not differ between groups (P = 0.09). Admission SI and time to normalize SI (SI < 0.9) were not different between survivors and nonsurvivors (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

While admission venous plasma lactate concentration could not discriminate between hospital survivors and nonsurvivors, lactate variables showed clinical utility to predict outcome in dogs with shock. Further studies are needed to determine SI reference ranges and optimal SI cut-off values to improve its prognostic ability in sick dogs.

Strategies for the management of haemorrhage following pelvic fractures and associated trauma-induced coagulopathy

Exsanguination is the second most common cause of death in patients who suffer severe trauma. The management of haemodynamically unstable high-energy pelvic injuries remains controversial, as there are no universally accepted guidelines to direct surgeons on the ideal use of pelvic packing or early angio-embolisation. Additionally, the optimal resuscitation strategy, which prevents or halts the progression of the trauma-induced coagulopathy, remains unknown. Although early and aggressive use of blood products in these patients appears to improve survival, over-enthusiastic resuscitative measures may not be the safest strategy. This paper provides an overview of the classification of pelvic injuries and the current evidence on best-practice management of high-energy pelvic fractures, including resuscitation, transfusion of blood components, monitoring of coagulopathy, and procedural interventions including pre-peritoneal pelvic packing, external fixation and angiographic embolisation.

Assessment and treatment of the trauma patient in shock

High-volume crystalloid resuscitation is associated with increased length of stay, ICU and ventilator days, and organ failure and infection rates. Rapid evaluation of a hemodynamically unstable trauma patient is vital to diagnosis and treatment of the cause of shock. CT scanning should be used liberally in trauma patients to effect decreased mortality. Nonoperative management and catheter-based interventions are becoming the standard of care in appropriately selected patients with solid organ injuries.

Critical care considerations in the management of the trauma patient following initial resuscitation

Background

Care of the polytrauma patient does not end in the operating room or resuscitation bay. The patient presenting to the intensive care unit following initial resuscitation and damage control surgery may be far from stable with ongoing hemorrhage, resuscitation needs, and injuries still requiring definitive repair. The intensive care physician must understand the respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, and immunologic consequences of trauma resuscitation and massive transfusion in order to evaluate and adjust the ongoing resuscitative needs of the patient and address potential complications. In this review, we address ongoing resuscitation in the intensive care unit along with potential complications in the trauma patient after initial resuscitation. Complications such as abdominal compartment syndrome, transfusion related patterns of acute lung injury and metabolic consequences subsequent to post-trauma resuscitation are presented.

Methods

A non-systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to May 2012.

Results and conclusion

Polytrauma patients with severe shock from hemorrhage and massive tissue injury present major challenges for management and resuscitation in the intensive care setting. Many of the current recommendations for “damage control resuscitation” including the use of fixed ratios in the treatment of trauma induced coagulopathy remain controversial. A lack of large, randomized, controlled trials leaves most recommendations at the level of consensus, expert opinion. Ongoing trials and improvements in monitoring and resuscitation technologies will further influence how we manage these complex and challenging patients.

Are central venous lactate and arterial lactate interchangeable? A human retrospective study

BACKGROUND

In critically ill patients, arterial blood lactate concentration (Lact(a)) and Lact(a) clearance are used for the diagnosis of shock, for prognosis assessment, and to guide therapy. In recent years, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO(2)), a surrogate for mixed venous blood saturation, either measured by fiberoptic catheters or from central venous blood samples, was used in shock to estimate the global balance between oxygen delivery and consumption. When central venous blood is drawn for ScvO(2) measurement, it also could be used to measure central venous lactate concentration (Lact(cv)). In this study, we evaluated the utility of Lact(cv) and Lact(cv) clearance as predictors of Lact(a) and Lact(a) clearance, respectively, in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in an intensive care unit of a regional and teaching hospital. Using the electronic registry of our blood gas analyzer from March 2007 to December 2009, we identified patients with circulatory or respiratory failure who had pairs of Lact(cv) and Lact(a) obtained within a 30-minute interval. To assess the utility of Lact(cv) as a predictor of Lact(a) above 2 and 4 mmol/L, we calculated the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for these thresholds. We also calculated AUC of Lact(cv) clearance to detect a Lact(a) clearance <10% or >10%.

RESULTS

Six hundred seventy-three Lact(cv)/Lact(a) pairs in 188 patients were analyzed. AUC of Lact(cv) to predict a Lact(a) above 2 and 4 mmol/L was 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.97-0.99) and 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.96-0.99), respectively. Lact(cv) with the cutoff value of 2 mmol/L can predict a Lact(a) above 2 mmol/L with sensitivity >92% and specificity >90%. AUC for Lact(cv) clearance to detect a Lact(a) clearance <10% or >10% was 0.93 or 0.94, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lact(cv) and Lact(a) collected within a 30-minute range are interchangeable for clinical practice.