Hypertonic saline and mannitol therapy in critical care neurology

The protective effects of methylene blue on astrocytic swelling after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injuries are mediated by Aquaporin-4 and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 activation

Methylene blue (MB) was found to exert neuroprotective effect on different brain diseases, such as ischemic stroke. This study assessed the MB effects on ischemia induced brain edema and its role in the inhibition of aquaporin 4 (AQP4) and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) expression. Rats were exposed 1 h transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO), and MB was injected intravenously following reperfusion (3 mg/kg). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining was performed 48 h after the onset of tMCAO to evaluate the brain infarction and edema. Brain tissues injuries as well as the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), AQP4 and mGluR5 expressions were detected. Oxygen and glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) was performed on primary astrocytes (ASTs) to induce cell swelling. MB was administered at the beginning of reoxygenation, and the perimeter of ASTs was measured by GFAP immunofluorescent staining. 3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) and fenobam were given at 24 h before OGD to examine their effects on MB functions on AST swelling and AQP4 expression. MB remarkably decreased the volumes of T2WI and ADC lesions, as well as the cerebral swelling. Consistently, MB treatment significantly decreased GFAP, mGluR5 and AQP4 expression at 48 h after stroke. In the cultivated primary ASTs, OGD/R and DHPG significantly increased ASTs volume as well as AQP4 expression, which was reversed by MB and fenobam treatment. The obtained results highlight that MB decreases the post-ischemic brain swelling by regulating the activation of AQP4 and mGluR5, suggesting potential applications of MB on clinical ischemic stroke treatment.

Hypertonic Saline vs. Mannitol in Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Children: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of two hyperosmolar agents (hypertonic saline vs. mannitol) used for the reduction of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in children.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted and GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) of evidence was applied. Relevant databases were searched till 31st May 2022. Primary outcome was mortality rate.

RESULTS

Of 720 citations retrieved, 4 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis (n = 365, male = 61%). Traumatic and non-traumatic cases of elevated ICP were included. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the two groups [relative risk (RR), 1.09; (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74 to 1.6)]. No significant difference was found for any of the secondary outcomes, except serum osmolality (being significantly higher in mannitol group). Adverse events like shock and dehydration were significantly higher in the mannitol group, and hypernatremia in the hypertonic saline group. The evidence generated for primary outcome was of "low certainty", and for secondary outcomes, it varied from "very-low to moderate certainty".

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference between hypertonic saline and mannitol used for the reduction of elevated ICP in children. The evidence generated for primary outcome (mortality rate) was of "low certainty", and for secondary outcomes, it varied from "very-low to moderate certainty". More data from high-quality RCTs are needed to guide any recommendation.

Initial Diagnosis and Management of Acutely Elevated Intracranial Pressure

Acutely elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) may have devastating effects on patient mortality and neurologic outcomes, yet its initial detection remains difficult because of the variety of manifestations that it can cause disease states it is associated with. Several treatment guidelines exist for specific disease processes such as trauma or ischemic stroke, but their recommendations may not apply to other causes. In the acute setting, management decisions must often be made before the underlying cause is known. In this review, we present an organized, evidence-based approach to the recognition and management of patients with suspected or confirmed elevated ICP in the first minutes to hours of resuscitation. We explore the utility of invasive and noninvasive methods of diagnosis, including history, physical examination, imaging, and ICP monitors. We synthesize various guidelines and expert recommendations and identify core management principles including noninvasive maneuvers, neuroprotective intubation and ventilation strategies, and pharmacologic therapies such as ketamine, lidocaine, corticosteroids, and the hyperosmolar agents mannitol and hypertonic saline. Although an in-depth discussion of the definitive management of each etiology is beyond the scope of this review, our goal is to provide an empirical approach to these time-sensitive, critical presentations in their initial stages.

Hypertonic saline for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes mortality and long-term disability among young adults and imposes a notable cost on the healthcare system. In addition to the first physical hit, secondary injury, which is associated with increased intracranial pressure (ICP), is defined as biochemical, cellular, and physiological changes after the physical injury. Mannitol and Hypertonic saline (HTS) are the treatment bases for elevated ICP in TBI. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of HTS in the management of patients with TBI.

METHODS

This study was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methods and PRISMA statement. A systematic search was performed through six databases in February 2022, to find studies that evaluated the effects of HTS, on increased ICP. Meta-analysis was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA).

RESULTS

Out of 1321 results, 8 studies were included in the systematic review, and 3 of them were included in the quantitative synthesis. The results of the meta-analysis reached a 35.9% (95% CI 15.0-56.9) reduction in ICP in TBI patients receiving HTS, with no significant risk of publication bias (t-value = 0.38, df = 2, p-value = 0.73). The most common source of bias in our included studies was the transparency of blinding methods for both patients and outcome assessors.

CONCLUSION

HTS can significantly reduce the ICP, which may prevent secondary injury. Also, based on the available evidence, HTS has relatively similar efficacy to Mannitol, which is considered the gold standard therapy for TBI, in boosting patients' neurological condition and reducing mortality rates.

Equiosmolar hypertonic saline and mannitol for brain relaxation in patients undergoing supratentorial tumor surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:

Hypertonic saline (HS) and mannitol are hyperosmolar agents that are usually used to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) and provide a satisfactory brain relaxation. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of HS and mannitol on brain relaxation intraoperatively in patient undergoing craniotomies for supra-tentorial brain tumors.

Methods:

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. We included randomized control trials that compared equiosmolar HS and mannitol in supratentorial tumors craniotomies and reported at least one of the following outcomes: degree of brain relaxation, ICP, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, perioperative fluid input, urine output, Na+ levels, and K+ levels. We searched Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase using MESH terms and keywords. The bibliographic references of included studies and trial registries were also searched.

Results:

Seven articles were included. The degree brain of relaxation was comparable across the two groups with slight tendency toward HS (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.99–1.29; P = 0.08). Mannitol was associated with significantly higher urine output (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −1.33, 95% CI −1.56–−1.10; P < 0.001). Na⁺ levels were higher in HS group (SMD = 1.47, 95% CI 0.86–2.09; P < 0.001). Mannitol was associated with non-significant decrease in CVP and increase fluid input (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI 0.00–0.85 and SMD = −0.18, 95% CI −0.37–0.02, respectively).

Conclusion:

Both HS and mannitol are associated with satisfactory brain relaxation with a non-statistically significant tendency for HS to achieve better relaxation scores with mannitol resulting in higher urine output while HS with higher Na⁺ levels.

Waste Clearance in the Brain

Waste clearance (WC) is an essential process for brain homeostasis, which is required for the proper and healthy functioning of all cerebrovascular and parenchymal brain cells. This review features our current understanding of brain WC, both within and external to the brain parenchyma. We describe the interplay of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), interstitial fluid (ISF), and perivascular spaces within the brain parenchyma for brain WC directly into the blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We also discuss the relevant role of the CSF and its exit routes in mediating WC. Recent discoveries of the glymphatic system and meningeal lymphatic vessels, and their relevance to brain WC are highlighted. Controversies related to brain WC research and potential future directions are presented.

Monitoring Serum Creatinine, Blood Urea Nitrogen in Patients Brain Injury with Mannitol Therapy

Increased intracranial pressure is a further effect of brain injury due to structural damage and osmotic and water imbalances (Edema). Mannitol works in the proximal tubules and mannitol in the absorption of tubular cells by the mechanism of pinocytosis. The fluid transfer will draw fluid into the intracellular, so that the cell will be switched and broke. This phenomenon is referred to as the phenomenon of "Nephrosis Osmotic", in which mannitol administration may occur as a result of accumulation of drugs in the kidneys due to prolonged exposure to mannitol in the kidney and given dosage. The effects of osmotic diuresis occurring plus the dose and duration of mannitol administration are reported to cause renal function disorders (Scr and BUN). The aim of this study was to analyze changes in serum creatinine and BUN in patients with brain injury from before receiving mannitol therapy and during mannitol treatment. From the results of the study the number of patients who met the inclusion criteria, 32 patients. Serum creatinine, the initial average of 0.85 ± 0.17 mg / dl and the last day of the mean SCr 0.74 ± 0.30 mg / dl. While the mean BUN (Blood Urea Nitrogen) was 11.27 ± 2.75 mg / dl and the mean last day was 17.08 mg / dl ± 8.59 mg / dl. From Serum Creatinine and BUN data it can be concluded that there is no significant change.

Designing electrode configuration of electroosmosis based edema treatment as a complement to hyperosmotic therapy

BACKGROUND

Hyperosmotic therapy is a mainstay treatment for cerebral edema. Although often effective, its disadvantages include mainly acting on the normal brain region with limited effectiveness in eliminating excess fluid in the edema region. This study investigates how to configure our previously proposed novel electroosmosis based edema treatment as a complement to hyperosmotic therapy.

METHODS

Three electrode configurations are designed to drive the excess fluid out of the edema region, including 2-electrode, 3-electrode, and 5-electrode designs. The focality and directionality of the induced electroosmotic flow (EOF) are then investigated using the same patient-specific head model with localized edema.

RESULTS

The 5-electrode design shows improved EOF focality with reduced effect on the normal brain region than the other two designs. Importantly, this design also achieves better directionality driving excess edema tissue fluid to a larger region of surrounding normal brain where hyperosmotic therapy functions better. Thus, the 5-electrode design is suggested to treat edema more efficiently via a synergic effect: the excess fluid is first driven out from the edema to surrounding normal brain via EOF, where it can then be treated with hyperosmotic therapy. Meanwhile, the 5-electrode design drives 2.22 mL excess fluid from the edema region in an hour comparable to the other designs, indicating a similar efficiency of EOF.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that the promise of our previously proposed novel electroosmosis based edema treatment can be designed to achieve better focality and directionality towards a complement to hyperosmotic therapy.

Randomized Clinical Trial of 20% Mannitol Versus 3% Hypertonic Saline in Children With Raised Intracranial Pressure Due to Acute CNS Infections

OBJECTIVES

Mannitol is a commonly used osmotherapy agent in raised intracranial pressure. However, the side effects of mannitol are significant. In traumatic brain injury (adult and pediatric), hypertonic saline (3%) shows varied results in comparison with 20% mannitol. We compared the effect of 3% hypertonic saline versus 20% mannitol (using common dosing strategies) on raised intracranial pressure in pediatric acute CNS infections.

DESIGN

Open-label randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

PICU of a quaternary care academic institute.

PATIENTS

Children 1-12 years old, with raised intracranial pressure and modified-Glasgow Coma Scale scores less than or equal to 8, were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to 20%-mannitol (n = 28), 0.5 gram/kg/dose versus 3%-hypertonic saline (n = 29), 10 mL/kg loading followed by 0.5-1 mL/kg/hr infusion. An intraparenchymal catheter was used to monitor the intracranial pressure. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieved target average intracranial pressure less than 20 mm Hg during 72 hours. Secondary outcomes were interventions, morbidity, and mortality.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The proportion of patients with target average intracranial pressure (< 20 mm Hg) was higher in hypertonic saline-group as compared to mannitol-group (79.3% vs 53.6%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.63; 95% CI: 1.23-5.61). Mean (± SE) reduction of intracranial pressure (-14.3 ± 1.7 vs -5.4 ± 1.7 mm Hg; p ≤ 0.001) and elevation of cerebral perfusion pressure (15.4 ± 2.4 vs 6 ± 2.4 mm Hg; p = 0.007) from baseline were significant in hypertonic saline-group. Mean (± SE) intracranial pressure over 72 hours was lower (14 ± 2 vs 22 ± 2 mm Hg; p = 0.009), and cerebral perfusion pressure was higher (65 ± 2.2 vs 58 ± 2.2; p = 0.032) in hypertonic saline-group. Hypertonic saline-group had higher modified-Glasgow Coma Scale score at 72 hours (median, interquartile range 10; 7-11 vs 7; 3-9; p = 0.003), lower mortality (20.7% vs 35.7%; p = 0.21), shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (5 vs 15 d; p = 0.002), and PICU stay (11 vs 19 d; p = 0.016) and less severe neurodisability at discharge (31% vs 61%; p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric acute CNS infections, 3%-hypertonic saline was associated with a greater reduction of intracranial pressure as compared to 20% mannitol.

Drug development in targeting ion channels for brain edema

Cerebral edema is a pathological hallmark of various central nervous system (CNS) insults, including traumatic brain injury (TBI) and excitotoxic injury such as stroke. Due to the rigidity of the skull, edema-induced increase of intracranial fluid significantly complicates severe CNS injuries by raising intracranial pressure and compromising perfusion. Mortality due to cerebral edema is high. With mortality rates up to 80% in severe cases of stroke, it is the leading cause of death within the first week. Similarly, cerebral edema is devastating for patients of TBI, accounting for up to 50% mortality. Currently, the available treatments for cerebral edema include hypothermia, osmotherapy, and surgery. However, these treatments only address the symptoms and often elicit adverse side effects, potentially in part due to non-specificity. There is an urgent need to identify effective pharmacological treatments for cerebral edema. Currently, ion channels represent the third-largest target class for drug development, but their roles in cerebral edema remain ill-defined. The present review aims to provide an overview of the proposed roles of ion channels and transporters (including aquaporins, SUR1-TRPM4, chloride channels, glucose transporters, and proton-sensitive channels) in mediating cerebral edema in acute ischemic stroke and TBI. We also focus on the pharmacological inhibitors for each target and potential therapeutic strategies that may be further pursued for the treatment of cerebral edema.

Dialysis Disequilibrium Syndrome and Cerebellar Herniation with Successful Reversal Using Mannitol

Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome (DDS) is a morbid but rare complication of dialysis. Feared sequalae of this diagnosis are brain herniation and death. This report presents a patient who was diagnosed with DDS with subsequent tonsillar herniation shown on imaging with complete resolution of clinical signs and symptoms, as well as imaging findings of herniation after prompt initiation of intravenous mannitol. This is the first known case of reversal and survival of DDS-induced tonsillar herniation using mannitol.

Sedation Patterns and Hyperosmolar Therapy in Emergency Departments were Associated with Blood Pressure Variability and Outcomes in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background

Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is associated with high mortality. Little information exists to guide initial resuscitation in the emergency department (ED) setting. However, blood pressure variability (BPV) and mechanical ventilation (MV) are known risk factors for poor outcome in sICH.

Objectives

The objective was to examine the associations between BPV and MV in ED (EDMV) and between two ED interventions - post-MV sedation and hyperosmolar therapy for elevated intracranial pressure - and BPV in the ED and in-hospital mortality.

Methods

We retrospectively studied adults with sICH and external ventricular drainage who were transferred to a quaternary academic medical center from other hospitals between January 2011 and September 2015. We used multivariable linear and logistic regressions to measure associations between clinical factors, BPV, and outcomes.

Results

We analyzed ED records from 259 patients. There were 143 (55%) EDMV patients who had more severe clinical factors and significantly higher values of all BPV indices than NoEDMV patients. Two clinical factors and none of the severity scores (i.e., Hunt and Hess, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Grades, ICH score) correlated with BPV. Hyperosmolarity therapy without fluid resuscitation positively correlated with all BPV indices, whereas propofol infusion plus a narcotic negatively correlated with one of them. Two BPV indices, i.e., successive variation of blood pressure (BP_SV) and absolute difference in blood pressure between ED triage and departure (BP_{Depart - Triage}), were significantly associated with increased mortality rate.

Conclusion

Patients receiving MV had significantly higher BPV, perhaps related to disease severity. Good ED sedation, hyperosmolar therapy, and fluid resuscitation were associated with less BPV and lower likelihood of death.

Hyperosmolar Therapy in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of hospital visits for children. Hyperosmolar therapy is often used to treat severe traumatic brain injury. Hypertonic saline is used predominantly, yet there remains disagreement about whether hypertonic saline or mannitol is more effective.

DATA SOURCES

Literature search was conducted using Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase. Systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

Retrospective and prospective studies assessing use of hyperosmolar therapy in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent authors performed article review. Two-thousand two-hundred thirty unique articles were initially evaluated, 11 were included in the final analysis, with a total of 358 patients. Study quality was assessed using Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Jadad score.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of the 11 studies, all evaluated hypertonic saline and four evaluated both hypertonic saline and mannitol. Nine reported that hypertonic saline lowered intracranial pressure and two reported that mannitol lowered intracranial pressure. The studies varied significantly in dose, concentration, and administrations schedule for both hypertonic saline and mannitol. Five studies were prospective, but only one directly compared mannitol to hypertonic saline. The prospective comparison study found no difference in physiologic outcomes. Clinical outcomes were reported using different measures across studies. For hypertonic saline-treated patients, mechanical ventilation was required for 6.9-9 days, decompressive craniectomy was required for 6.25-29.3% of patients, ICU length of stay was 8.0-10.6 days, in-hospital mortality was 10-48%, and 6-month mortality was 7-17%. In mannitol-treated patients, ICU length of stay was 9.5 days, in-hospital mortality was 56%, and 6-month mortality was 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

Both hypertonic saline and mannitol appear to lower intracranial pressure and improve clinical outcomes in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, but the evidence is extremely fractured both in the method of treatment and in the evaluation of outcomes. Given the paucity of high-quality data, it is difficult to definitively conclude which agent is better or what treatment protocol to follow.

In vitro effects of lactated Ringer's solution, hypertonic saline, hydroxyethyl starch, hypertonic saline/hydroxyethyl starch, and mannitol on thromboelastographic variables of canine whole blood

OBJECTIVE

To assess the in vitro effects of crystalloid and colloid IV fluids on the thromboelastographic (TEG) variables of canine whole blood.

DESIGN

In vitro experimental study.

SETTING

Veterinary teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Twenty-two healthy dogs.

INTERVENTION

Citrated whole blood samples collected from healthy dogs were diluted with 3.4% hypertonic saline (HTS 3.4), 7% hypertonic saline (HTS 7), and 20% mannitol at 8% and 16% dilutions; hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (HES 130/0.4) at 16% dilution; lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) at 16%, 33%, and 66% dilutions; and HTS 7-HES 130/0.4 at 25% and 50% dilutions. Kaolin-activated TEG analysis was concurrently performed on diluted and control (undiluted) samples.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Dilution of canine whole blood with LRS compared to control reduced α angle and MA at both 33% (P = 0.009 and P = 0.011, respectively) and 66% dilution (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), and prolonged K time at 66% dilution (P = 0.003). At 16% dilution, HTS 3.4, prolonged R time (P = 0.007), while mannitol, a fluid iso osmolar to HTS 3.4, prolonged K time (P = 0.006), reduced α angle (P < 0.001), MA (P = 0.046), and LY60 (P = 0.015). At 8% dilution, HTS 7, a fluid of high osmolarity and tonicity, prolonged R time (P = 0.009) and reduced MA (P = 0.015), while all measured TEG variables were altered at the 16% dilution (P < 0.01 for all variables). HES 130/0.4 reduced α angle (P = 0.031) and MA (P = 0.001) and increased LY60 (P < 0.001) at 16% dilution. Comparing different fluid types, HES 130/0.4 and HTS 3.4 had no to minor, mannitol intermediate, and HTS 7 profound effects on TEG variables (P < 0.05) when compared to LRS at the same dilution.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro dilution of canine whole blood with commonly used IV fluids leads to thromboelastographic changes consistent with hypocoagulability in a dose dependent manner for all fluid types tested. Viscoelastic changes are also influenced by fluid characteristics, specifically tonicity and osmolarity.

Factors associated with cerebral edema in children under 5 years of age admitted in an intensive care unit and their outcome

Objective:

We aimed to evaluate risk factors and outcome of cerebral edema in children with diarrhea.

Methods:

In this retrospective chart analysis, data of all diarrheal children under 5 years of age having convulsion and admitted in intensive care unit were retrieved from an electronic medical record system of Dhaka Hospital of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, from 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2016. Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics was made between children with (cases = 22) and without cerebral edema (controls = 66).

Results:

Cases more often had a fatal outcome than controls (36% vs 8%, p = 0.003). In logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders, the cases were independently associated with respiratory distress (odds ratio = 5.5, confidence interval = 1.55–19.62, p = 0.008), severe sepsis (odds ratio = 4.6, confidence interval = 1.24–16.77, p = 0.022), and severe malnutrition (odds ratio = 0.16, confidence interval = 0.04–0.74, p = 0.019). A rapid drop (>0.5 mmol/L per hour) in serum sodium did not have any impact on developing cerebral edema (p = 0.090).

Conclusion:

Identification of simple clinical predictors may help in the early treatment of cerebral edema that may further help in reducing deaths in such children especially in resource-poor settings. However, further research with prospective design is needed to consolidate our observation.

The Use of Mannitol and Hypertonic Saline Therapies in Patients with Elevated Intracranial Pressure: A Review of the Evidence

Patients with increased intracranial pressure generally require pharmacologic therapies and often more definitive treatments, such as surgical intervention. The overall goal of these interventions is to maintain or re-establish adequate cerebral blood flow and prevent herniation. Regardless of the cause of increased intracranial pressure, osmotherapy is considered the mainstay of medical therapy, and should be administered as soon as possible. This article reviews the history of hyperosmolar and hypertonic therapies, the Monro-Kellie hypothesis, and types of cerebral edema. Pharmacologic properties, clinical applications, complications, recommended monitoring during therapy, and risks versus benefits are also discussed.

Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of 5% Sodium Chloride Compared With 23.4% Sodium Chloride for Osmotic Therapy

Background: Bolus doses of 23.4% sodium chloride (NaCl) are commonly used for the treatment of intracranial hypertension; however, delays in administration may occur in patients without central intravenous access. At our institution, equiosmolar bolus doses of 5% NaCl have emerged as potential alternatives to 23.4% NaCl because they may be safely administered through peripheral lines. Objectives: We sought to assess the efficacy in reducing intracranial pressure (ICP), time to administration, and safety of 5% NaCl as compared with 23.4% NaCl for the treatment of intracranial hypertension. Methods: Patients admitted from July 2012 to June 2014 who received boluses of 5% NaCl or 23.4% NaCl for a sustained ICP >20 mm Hg were included. Data collected included measurements of ICP, time to administration, and adverse events. Results: A total of 44 patients were identified; 11 received 5% NaCl, and 33 received 23.4% NaCl. The median percentage reductions in ICP at 30, 60, and 120 minutes in patients who received 5% versus 23.4% NaCl were 34% versus 26% ( P = 0.850), 48% versus 40% ( P = 0.700), and 46% versus 30% ( P = 0.064), respectively. The median time to administration was shorter in the 5% NaCl group (7 vs 11 minutes, P = 0.364). Both groups had a 27% rate of adverse events and no infusion site reactions. Conclusions: These data suggest that 5% NaCl may be as effective as 23.4% NaCl at lowering ICP if given at equiosmolar doses, has a shorter time to administration, and has no difference in the prevalence of adverse events.

Anesthesia for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a wide spectrum of disease and disease severity. Because the primary brain injury occurs before the patient enters the health care system, medical interventions seek principally to prevent secondary injury. Anesthesia teams that provide care for patients with TBI both in and out of the operating room should be aware of the specific therapies and needs of this unique and complex patient population.

In vivo leukocyte-mediated brain microcirculatory inflammation: a comparison of osmotherapies and progesterone in severe traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Mannitol, hypertonic saline, and progesterone may blunt leukocyte recruitment after traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesized that progesterone reduces pericontusional recruitment of leukocytes to a greater extent than either osmotherapy a day after TBI.

METHODS

CD1 mice underwent controlled cortical impact and were treated with osmotherapy (mannitol and hypertonic saline) or progesterone. Thirty-two hours after TBI, live pial microscopy was used to evaluate leukocyte-endothelial interactions and immunohistochemistry was used for the detection of pericontusional tissue polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Neurologic recovery was assessed before sacrifice.

RESULTS

Mannitol resulted in the lowest in vivo leukocyte recruitment compared with progesterone (795 ± 282 vs 1,636 ± 434 LEU/100 μm/minutes, P < .05). Mannitol also displayed lower tissue accumulation of leukocytes as compared with progesterone (5.7 ± 1.7 vs 15.2 ± .1 LEU/mm(2), P = .03). However, progesterone resulted in better neurologic recovery than either osmotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Leukocyte recruitment to injured brain is lowest with mannitol administration. How different agents alter progression of secondary brain injury will require further evaluation in humans.

Post-traumatic multimodal brain monitoring: response to hypertonic saline

Emerging evidence suggests that hypertonic saline (HTS) is efficient in decreasing intracranial pressure (ICP). However there is no consensus about its interaction with brain hemodynamics and oxygenation. In this study, we investigated brain response to HTS bolus with multimodal monitoring after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We included 18 consecutive TBI patients during 10 days after neurocritical care unit admission. Continuous brain monitoring applied included ICP, tissue oxygenation (PtO2) and cerebral blood flow (CBF). Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), cerebrovascular resistance (CVR), and reactivity indices related to pressure (PRx) and flow (CBFx) were calculated. ICM+software was used to collect and analyze monitoring data. Eleven of 18 (61%) patients developed 99 episodes of intracranial hypertension (IHT) greater than 20 mm Hg that were managed with 20% HTS bolus. Analysis over time was performed with linear mixed-effects regression modelling. After HTS bolus, ICP and CPP improved over time (p<0.001) following a quadratic model. From baseline to 120 min, ICP had a mean decrease of 6.2 mm Hg and CPP a mean increase of 3.1 mmHg. Mean increase in CBF was 7.8 mL/min/100 g (p<0.001) and mean decrease in CVR reached 0.4 mm Hg*min*100 g/mL (p=0.01). Both changes preceded pressures improvement. PtO2 exhibited a marginal increase and no significant models for time behaviour could be fitted. PRx and CBFx were best described by a linear decreasing model showing autoregulation recover after HTS (p=0.01 and p=0.04 respectively). During evaluation, CO2 remained constant and sodium level did not exhibit significant variation. In conclusion, management of IHT with 20% HTS significantly improves cerebral hemodynamics and cerebrovascular reactivity with recovery of CBF appearing before rise in CPP and decrease in ICP. In spite of cerebral hemodynamic improvement, no significant changes in brain oxygenation were identified.

Management of raised intracranial pressure and hyperosmolar therapy

The management of raised intracranial pressure is undergoing rapid change. The choice of medical treatments to reduce intracranial pressure varies between institutions and regions of the world. The mainstay of therapy, however, continues to be the infusion of a hyperosmolar solution to achieve an osmotic gradient to force the exit of water from the brain. This review introduces the basic concepts of raised intracranial pressure, summarises several recent studies that have challenged dogma in the field, and provides practical advice on hyperosmolar treatment, based on personal experience and a critical reading of the literature.

Central Nervous System Infections

Central nervous system (CNS) infections—i.e., infections involving the brain (cerebrum and cerebellum), spinal cord, optic nerves, and their covering membranes—are medical emergencies that are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, or long-term sequelae that may have catastrophic implications for the quality of life of affected individuals. Acute CNS infections that warrant neurointensive care (ICU) admission fall broadly into three categories—meningitis, encephalitis, and abscesses—and generally result from blood-borne spread of the respective microorganisms. Other causes of CNS infections include head trauma resulting in fractures at the base of the skull or the cribriform plate that can lead to an opening between the CNS and the sinuses, mastoid, the middle ear, or the nasopharynx. Extrinsic contamination of the CNS can occur intraoperatively during neurosurgical procedures. Also, implanted medical devices or adjunct hardware (e.g., shunts, ventriculostomies, or external drainage tubes) and congenital malformations (e.g., spina bifida or sinus tracts) can become colonized and serve as sources or foci of infection. Viruses, such as rabies, herpes simplex virus, or polioviruses, can spread to the CNS via intraneural pathways resulting in encephalitis. If infection occurs at sites (e.g., middle ear or mastoid) contiguous with the CNS, infection may spread directly into the CNS causing brain abscesses; alternatively, the organism may reach the CNS indirectly via venous drainage or the sheaths of cranial and spinal nerves. Abscesses also may become localized in the subdural or epidural spaces. Meningitis results if bacteria spread directly from an abscess to the subarachnoid space. CNS abscesses may be a result of pyogenic meningitis or from septic emboli associated with endocarditis, lung abscess, or other serious purulent infections. Breaches of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) can result in CNS infections. Causes of such breaches include damage (e.g., microhemorrhage or necrosis of surrounding tissue) to the BBB; mechanical obstruction of microvessels by parasitized red blood cells, leukocytes, or platelets; overproduction of cytokines that degrade tight junction proteins; or microbe-specific interactions with the BBB that facilitate transcellular passage of the microorganism. The microorganisms that cause CNS infections include a wide range of bacteria, mycobacteria, yeasts, fungi, viruses, spirochaetes (e.g., neurosyphilis), and parasites (e.g., cerebral malaria and strongyloidiasis). The clinical picture of the various infections can be nonspecific or characterized by distinct, recognizable clinical syndromes. At some juncture, individuals with severe acute CNS infections require critical care management that warrants neuro-ICU admission. The implications for CNS infections are serious and complex and include the increased human and material resources necessary to manage very sick patients, the difficulties in triaging patients with vague or mild symptoms, and ascertaining the precise cause and degree of CNS involvement at the time of admission to the neuro-ICU. This chapter addresses a wide range of severe CNS infections that are better managed in the neuro-ICU. Topics covered include the medical epidemiology of the respective CNS infection; discussions of the relevant neuroanatomy and blood supply (essential for understanding the pathogenesis of CNS infections) and pathophysiology; symptoms and signs; diagnostic procedures, including essential neuroimaging studies; therapeutic options, including empirical therapy where indicated; and the perennial issue of the utility and effectiveness of steroid therapy for certain CNS infections. Finally, therapeutic options and alternatives are discussed, including the choices of antimicrobial agents best able to cross the BBB, supportive therapy, and prognosis.

Hypertonic saline in elevated intracranial pressure: past, present, and future

Hypertonic Saline (HS) has been a proven and effective therapy and a safe alternative to mannitol in patients with increase intracranial pressure (ICP). We hereby present a case of 25-year-old women with intracranial bleed secondary to right parietal arteriovenous malformation. Patient underwent surgery for evacuation of hematoma and resection of arteriovenous malformation. Post- operative course was complicated by recurrent episodes of elevated ICP. She received total of 17 doses of 23.4% HS and 30 doses of mannitol with good outcome. Despite reluctance from some clinicians to use HS, hypertonic saline seems to be a safe and effective therapy.

Anesthetic management of a patient with hemophilia A with spontaneous acute subdural hematoma

Intracranial hemorrhage in patients with hemophilia is associated with high mortality and sequelae. We report the case of 50-year-old man with Hemophilia A, who presented with spontaneous acute subdural hematoma and underwent craniotomy for clot evacuation. The patient received Factor VIII infusions perioperatively along with other measures to decrease blood loss. The patient presented with signs of high intracranial tension and received 3% saline intraoperatively and postoperatively to prevent brain edema. Recommendations for perioperative preparation and management of hemophilia, especially in the setting of emergency major surgery are reviewed.

Hypertonic saline, not mannitol, should be considered gold-standard medical therapy for intracranial hypertension

Hyperosmolar therapy is the principal medical management strategy for elevated intracranial pressure. Mannitol has been the primary hyperosmolar agent for nearly a century and remains the de facto gold standard for medical management of intracranial hypertension. Over the past 25 years, however, hypertonic saline (HTS) has become a progressively more common alternative to mannitol, and several recent studies have suggested its relative superiority. These findings have prompted calls for large-scale comparator trials of mannitol and HTS, but such trials would only be necessary if the designation of mannitol as the gold standard is appropriate and if current evidence suggests its therapeutic equipoise with HTS. Mounting evidence supporting HTS suggests that neither of these conditions is necessarily true and, instead, mandates reassessment of the actual gold-standard agent for hyperosmolar therapy. In the present article I make the case that current evidence supports HTS, not mannitol, as the better choice for gold-standard therapy for medical management of intracranial hypertension. This is accomplished first by examining the evidence on which the apparent designation of mannitol as the presumed gold-standard is based, then by reviewing the recent comparative efficacy data for HTS versus mannitol, and finanally by discussing additional clinical considerations for appropriate designation of a gold-standard agent for hyperosmolar therapy. This assessment has important implications both for patient care and for clinical trial design.