Hyperacute Hemodynamic Effects of BiPAP Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Emergency Department

The Impact of BiLevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) Application Timing on Emergency Room Length of Stay in Patients With Pulmonary Edema: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

 Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is a form of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) that is used to help and facilitate breathing. Our objective is to evaluate the impact of BiPAP application time on the length of emergency room (ER) stay in pulmonary edema patients.

METHOD

This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients who presented to the ER at King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC) from June 2019 to June 2021. The eligibility criteria for BiPAP application were congestive heart failure (CHF) and type 1 and type 2 respiratory failure, The data were collected from the Track Care system. We defined early BiPAP as BiPAP application time within one hour from admission, and late BiPAP more than one hour and we calculated the percentage of discharge within four hours in each group.

RESULT

 Out of 147 fulfilling study eligibility, 64% had CHF, 23% had type 2 respiratory failure and 13% had type 1 respiratory failure. For patients discharged within four hours, 85% were in the early BiPAP and 15% were in the late BiPAP groups (p = 0.001 as compared to the late discharge group). Discharge within four hours was observed with the following percentages in the study subgroups: CHF early BiPAP (84%), late BiPAP (16%) (p = 0.004), type 1 respiratory failure early BiPAP (79%), late BiPAP (21%) (p = 0.71) and type 2 respiratory failure early BiPAP (94%), late BiPAP (6%) (p = 0.89).

CONCLUSION

 Our results show that there is a significant outcome in early BiPAP application in decreasing the length of ER stay only in patients with pulmonary edema.

Non-Invasive Ventilation as a Therapy Option for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Acute Cardiopulmonary Oedema in Emergency Medical Services

In this observational prospective multicenter study conducted between October 2016 and October 2018, we tested the hypothesis that the use of prehospital non-invasive ventilation (phNIV) to treat patients with acute respiratory insufficiency (ARI) caused by severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and acute cardiopulmonary oedema (ACPE) is effective, time-efficient and safe. The data were collected at four different physician response units and three admitting hospitals in a German EMS system. Patients with respiratory failure due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute cardiopulmonary oedema were enrolled. A total of 545 patients were eligible for the final analysis. Patients were treated with oxygen supplementation, non-invasive ventilation or invasive mechanical ventilation. The primary outcomes were defined as changes in the clinical parameters and the in-hospital course. The secondary outcomes included time efficiency, peri-interventional complications, treatment failure rate, and side-effects. Oxygenation under phNIV improved equally to endotracheal intubation (ETI), and more effectively in comparison to standard oxygen therapy (SOT) (paO2 SOT vs. non-invasive ventilation (NIV) vs. ETI: 82 mmHg vs. 125 mmHg vs. 135 mmHg, p-value SOT vs. NIV < 0.0001). In a matched subgroup analysis phNIV was accompanied by a reduced time of mechanical ventilation (phNIV: 1.8 d vs. ETI: 4.2 d) and a shortened length of stay at the intensive care unit (3.4 d vs. 5.8 d). The data support the hypothesis that the treatment of severe AECOPD/ACPE-induced ARI using prehospital NIV is effective, time efficient and safe. Compared to ETI, a matched comparison supports the hypothesis that prehospital implementation of NIV may provide benefits for an in-hospital course.

Utilization and outcomes of early respiratory support in 6.5 million acute heart failure hospitalizations

AIMS

The incidence and outcomes of a requirement for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization are not clearly established. Thus, we aimed to characterize the incidence and trends in use of IMV and NIV in AHF and to estimate the magnitude of hazard for mortality associated with requiring IMV and NIV in AHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify AHF hospitalizations between 2008 and 2014. The exposure variable of interest was IMV or NIV use within 24 h of hospital admission compared to no respiratory support. We analysed the association between ventilation strategies and in-hospital mortality using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for demographics and comorbidities. We included 6 534 675 hospitalizations for AHF. Of these, 271 589 (4.16%) included NIV and 51 459 (0.79%) included IMV within the first 24 h of hospitalization and rates of NIV and IMV use increased over time. In-hospital mortality for AHF hospitalizations including NIV was 5.0% and 27% for IMV compared with 2.1% for neither (P < 0.001 for both). In an adjusted model, requirement for NIV was associated with over two-fold higher risk for in-hospital mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.01-2.19; P < 0.001] and requirement for IMV was associated with over three-fold higher risk for in-hospital mortality (HR 3.39, 95% CI 3.14-3.66; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Respiratory support is used in many AHF hospitalizations, and AHF patients who require respiratory support are at high risk for in-hospital mortality. Our work should inform prospective intervention trials and quality improvement ventures in this high-risk population.

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilator deteriorates the outcome of pneumomediastinum in anti-MDA5 antibody-positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis

BACKGROUND

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody (Ab)-positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) with pneumomediastinum (PNM) is a life-threatening condition. We aim to determine the prognostic factors affecting survival of patients with anti-MDA5 Ab-positive CADM complicated with PNM.

METHODS

We retrospectively established a cohort of patients with anti-MDA5 Ab-positive CADM complicated with PNM from April 2013 to July 2019. Demographic data and clinical characteristics from medical records were analyzed and variables were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. We performed univariate and multivariate survival analyses by Cox regression. Survival curves were depicted by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 133 patients with anti-MDA5 Ab-positive CADM, 20 were diagnosed with PNM. The cumulative estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 85% at 1 week, 55% at 1 month, and 40% at 1 year. Univariate analysis indicated several factors associated with survival. Worse liver function (AST, p = 0.043; LDH, p = 0.002; TBIL, p = 0.038), higher CRP level (p = 0.044), higher HRCT score (p = 0.022), and using noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) (p < 0.01) were associated with poor prognosis. In a multivariate Cox regression model, AST level and using NPPV were indicated to be independent predictors of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

In this research, we found that the incidence rate of PNM in anti-MDA5 Ab-positive CADM was 15.5%, obviously higher than in classical DM. The application of noninvasive positive pressure ventilator (NPPV) and higher AST level were independent risk factors for survival.Key Points• Anti-MDA5 Ab-positive CADM complicated with PNM is a life-threatening condition with an incidence rate of 15.5%.• The application of NPPV and worse liver function were independent risk factors for survival of anti-MDA5 Ab-positive CADM patients complicated with PNM.