Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Survival Among Critically Ill Patients With Cirrhosis

The causes of death in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis following liver transplantation stratified using pre-liver transplant BMI

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Determining the effects of pre-liver transplant (LT) BMI independent of underlying ascites on the post-LT outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is needed to clarify the paradoxical and protective effects of obesity on post-LT endpoints. In order to accomplish this, we used graded severities of ascites to stratify the NASH-LT population and to perform an ascites-specific strata analysis with differing pre-LT BMI levels.

METHODS

2005-2019 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) database was queried to select patients with NASH, who were categorized into specific sets of ascites severity: no ascites (n = 1188), mild ascites (n = 4463), and moderate ascites (n = 3525). Then, BMI classification (underweight: < 18.5, normal: 18.5-25, overweight: 25-30, obese: ≥ 30 kg/m2) was used to stratify each ascites-specific group and to compare to the post-LT mortality endpoints. Those under 18 years old and those who received living/multi-organ transplants were excluded.

RESULTS

Among each ascites category, there were the following numbers of normal, underweight, overweight, and obese BMI patients respectively; no ascites: 161, 4, 359, 664; mild ascites: 643, 28, 1311, 2481; and moderate ascites: 529, 25, 1030, 1941. The obese BMI cohort was at a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to recipients with normal BMI with mild ascites (aHR: 0.79, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.65-0.94, p-value = 0.010; case-incidence 47.10 vs 56.81 deaths per 1000 person-years) and moderate ascites (aHR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, p-value = 0.009; case-incidence 53.71 vs 66.17 deaths per 1000 person-years). In addition, the overweight BMI cohort with mild ascites demonstrated a lower hazard of all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.97, p-value = 0.03; case-incidence 49.09 vs 56.81 deaths per 1000 person-years). There was no difference in graft failure for the three BMI groups (underweight, overweight, and obese) in comparison to normal BMI. Furthermore, the overweight BMI group with mild ascites cohort demonstrated a lower hazard of death due to general infectious causes (aHR: 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.83, p = 0.006; case-incidence 6.12 vs 11.91 deaths per 1000 person-years) and sepsis (aHR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.86, p = 0.01; case-incidence 4.31 vs 8.50 deaths per 1000 person-years).

CONCLUSION

The paradoxical effects of obesity in reducing the risks of all-cause death appears to be in part modulated by ascites. The current study emphasizes the need to evaluate BMI with concomitant ascites severity pre-LT to accurately prognosticate post-LT outcomes when evaluating NASH patients with advanced liver disease.

MDCT-findings in patients with non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI): influence of vasoconstrictor agents

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of vasoconstrictor agents (VCAs) on signs of vasoconstriction and bowel ischemia on MDCT detected in patients with non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI).

METHODS

This 8-year single-center retrospective study consecutively included all patients with histopathologically proven NOMI who underwent MDCT ≤ 48 h prior to surgical bowel resection. Two blinded radiologists jointly reviewed each examination for signs of bowel ischemia, abdominal organ infarct, mesenteric vessel size and regularity, and ancillary vascular findings. VCA administration (length and dosage), clinical and biochemical data, risk factors, and outcomes were retrieved from patients' medical records. Subgroup comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included (59 males, mean age 65 years); 40 (44.4%) had received VCAs before MDCT. Overall mortality was 32% (n = 29), with no significant difference between the two groups. In patients treated with VCAs, the calibre of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was smaller (p = 0.032), and vasoconstriction of its branches tended to be more important (p = 0.096) than in patients not treated with VCAs. The presence and extent of bowel ischemia did not significantly correlate with VCA administration, but abdominal organ infarcts tended to be more frequent (p = 0.005) and involved more organs (p = 0.088). The VCA group had lower mean arterial pressure (p = 0.006) and lower hemoglobin levels (p < 0.001). Several biomarkers of organ failure and inflammation, differed significantly with VCA use, proving worse clinical condition.

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT demonstrates more severe SMA vasoconstriction and tends to show increased abdominal organ infarcts after VCA administration in NOMI patients compared to NOMI patients not treated with VCAs.

KEY POINTS

• In critically ill patients with NOMI, MDCT demonstrates VCA support via increased vasoconstriction of the main SMA and its branches. • VCA administration in NOMI patients tends to contribute to the development of organ infarcts, as shown on MDCT. • An important degree of vasoconstriction in NOMI patients may indicate insufficient resuscitation and, thus, help clinicians in further patient management.